Not applicable.
The present invention relates to compliant hinges, and in particular compliant hinges for deployable membrane-like structures and other applications.
A compliant hinge is a thin member that provides relative rotation between adjacent rigid members through bending. As shown in
Also referred to as flexural hinges or flexures, compliant hinges can be used for numerous tasks, including interconnecting rigid parts that require stowage for transport and deployment for service. Compliant hinges include many advantages over jointed (classical) hinges, including compactness, ease of fabrication, and substantially no friction losses, hysteresis, or need for lubrication.
Despite their advantages over jointed hinges, known compliant hinges can have large in-plane stiffness, making them undesirable for membrane-like structures. In addition, known compliant hinges are sometimes sufficiently thin to avoid strain levels that might lead to permanent deformations or fractures when folded to 180°.
An improved compliant hinge is provided. The compliant hinge generally includes a flexible intermediate portion having one or more enclosed contours along longitudinal axis of symmetry. The enclosed contours are resiliently deformable in response to an in-plane load, including tension and shear forces, and can interconnect rigid panels in tensioned precision structures and other applications.
In one embodiment, the intermediate portion includes a plurality of transverse segments and a plurality of longitudinal segments. The transverse and longitudinal segments define on or more rectangular enclosures in a minimum strain energy state. The rectangular enclosures are resiliently deformable when subject to in-plane loads. For example, a tensile load tends to spread the transverse segments apart from each other and tends to draw the longitudinal segments closer to each other. In addition, a bending load can fold the compliant hinge to 180° with a reduced folding radius due in part to rotation of the transverse segments while loaded in torsion.
In another embodiment, the intermediate portion includes laterally spaced apart serpentine elements. The serpentine elements include transverse and longitudinal segments that intersect at angled junctions. The serpentine elements are symmetrically disposed about a longitudinal axis, and deform axially and in shear to allow equilibrium without wrinkling. In addition, the serpentine elements can be folded without permanent deformation. A reduced folding radius is achieved through rotation of the transverse portions of the serpentine elements.
In these and other embodiments, the compliant hinge can be used for deployable membrane-like tensioned precision structures and other applications. For example, the compliant hinge can include a monolithic construction that compensates for errors in membrane-like tensioned precision structures. In-plane axial and shear compliance is realized through bending of transverse and longitudinal segments, and folding compliance is realized through bending of longitudinal segments about a middle transverse axis and by torsion of the transverse segments. The tensioned precision structure benefits from a greater shape determinacy, and an increased resistance to wrinkling. If structural errors are introduced in the fabrication or thermal warping of the tensioned precision structure, the compliant hinges can adjust and deform to a new minimum strain energy state without introducing significant out-of-plane stresses.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention, when viewed in accordance with the accompanying drawings and appended claims.
The invention as contemplated and disclosed herein includes a compliant hinge for deployable membrane-like structures and other applications. The compliant hinge includes an intermediate portion having an enclosed contour that is resiliently deformable in response to in-plane loads, including tension and shear forces. The flexible intermediate portion allows for rotation, bending, and extension, and can interconnect rigid panels in tensioned precision structures and other applications.
Referring now to
As noted above, the compliant hinge 18 includes an intermediate portion 24 defining one or more enclosed contours 28. As used herein, an “enclosed contour” is the structure that borders or defines an open area, also referred to herein as an interior region. The enclosed contour can include one or more segments and/or end tabs. The segments can be linear or curved. In the illustrated embodiment, the enclosed contour 28 includes multiple substantially linear segments that border a rectangular interior region. Referring again to
The intermediate portion 24 additionally includes one or more inner longitudinal segments 38. The inner longitudinal segments 38 are parallel to, and aligned with, the longitudinal axis of symmetry 34 of the compliant hinge 18. ln addition, the inner longitudinal segments 38 are nearer to the longitudinal axis of symmetry 34 than are the outer longitudinal segments 32. A first inner longitudinal segment 38 is coupled between the first end tab 20 and a first enclosed contour 28, a second inner longitudinal segment 38 is coupled between the first enclosed contour 28 and the second enclosed contour 28, and a third inner longitudinal segment 38 is coupled between the second enclosed contour 28 and the second end tab 22.
The compliant hinge 18 is a planar or two-dimensional monolithic element in the present embodiment, being formed of a resiliently elastic material. The compliant hinge 18 is optionally formed by molding, end-milling, laser cutting, or metal stamping. The compliant hinge 18 generally includes a uniform thickness, however the individual segments can each define a different width to achieve the desire stiffness. As explained in connection with
Referring now to
In-plane compliance of the tensioned precision structure 18 is achieved through bending of the segments 30, 32, 38, generally shown in
Folding the tensioned precision structure 18 about the middle transverse axis 36 to 180° is facilitated by twisting of the transverse segments 30, shown in
As noted above, the compliant hinge 18 of the present embodiment employs one or more closed contours 28 connected to each other and to the end tabs 20, 22 along a longitudinal axis of symmetry 34. The symmetrical construction ensures that no (or nearly no) lateral forces are generated when the hinge is subjected to a tensioning force. For membrane-like tensioned precision structures, the in-plane compliance in the direction of main force (extensional) can be accomplished through various solutions; however, symmetry, low shear stiffness, and 180° folding capabilities are attributes of the compliant hinge of the present invention.
A compliant hinge in accordance with another embodiment is illustrated in
A compliant hinge in accordance with another embodiment is illustrated in
A compliant hinge in accordance with another embodiment is illustrated in
The compliant hinges disclosed above exhibit in-plane compliance that are often required by tensioned precision structures as well as folding capability for stowage and deployment. As shown in
The compliant hinges offer increased potential for customization regarding the location, size, stiffness, and materials as required by specific membrane-like deployable structures. In addition, the compliant hinges can be engineered with known locations and stiffness properties. The shape determinacy of the tensioned structure using them can be significantly greater than a traditional membrane. The structural benefit provided by the relatively low in-plane shear compliance is the structure's resistance to wrinkling, where wrinkling includes the out-of-plane deflection of an otherwise two -dimensional structure, for example a membrane-like deployable structure. If a structural error is introduced, such as from fabrication, or thermal warping, the compliant hinges, as the only source of significant compliance in the structure, can adjust and deform to a new minimum strain energy stated without significant out of plane stresses.
The compliant hinge can therefore be used for deployable membrane-like tensioned precision structures or other applications as deemed appropriate. To reiterate, the compliant hinge can include a monolithic construction including transverse and longitudinal segments that are arranged in symmetric configurations such that in operation the segments will be subjected to bending and/or torsion to produce the compliance in different directions required to compensate for different errors in tensioned structures in general and membrane-like tensioned precision structures in particular. In some embodiments the compliant hinge includes a number of closed contours that are connected to each other with longitudinal segments, while in other embodiments the compliant hinge includes two elements resembling serpentine springs arranged in a symmetric configuration. In-plane axial and shear compliance is realized through bending of transverse and longitudinal segments, and folding compliance is realized through bending of longitudinal segments and by torsion of the transverse segments.
The above description is that of current embodiments of the invention. Various alterations and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents. Any reference to elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” or “said,” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular.
The conditions under which this invention was made are such as to entitle the Government of the United States under paragraph 1(a) of Executive Order 10096, as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force, to the entire right, title and interest therein, including foreign rights.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2292176 | Tate | Aug 1942 | A |
3032808 | Fleming | May 1962 | A |
3512419 | Stiles | May 1970 | A |
3925136 | Wakeman | Dec 1975 | A |
4559717 | Scire et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
3474488 | Kruzich | Oct 1989 | A |
4905972 | Scowen | Mar 1990 | A |
5083757 | Barsky | Jan 1992 | A |
5413239 | Rider, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5545210 | Hess | Aug 1996 | A |
5729867 | Carmichael | Mar 1998 | A |
6041477 | Rentsch | Mar 2000 | A |
6175989 | Carpenter | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6314691 | Takagi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334235 | Duperray et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6471719 | Voinov | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6772479 | Hinkley | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7009578 | Nolan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7082196 | Kauhaniemi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7270319 | Culpepper | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7354033 | Murphey | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7685676 | McClellan | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694465 | Pryor | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7806370 | Beidleman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8356774 | Banik et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8434196 | Murphey et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
9047055 | Song | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9157497 | Magleby | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9440302 | Gianchandani | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20050151015 | Cagle | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20100183456 | Toonder | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20130216740 | Russell-Clarke | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140196253 | Song et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150131222 | Kauhaniemi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154885 | Livermore-Clifford | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160145919 | Howell | May 2016 | A1 |
20160177605 | Howell | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160299532 | Gheorghiu | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 201 205 | Jun 2010 | EP |
03040780 | May 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Barllaro. Giuseppe et al , “Analysis, simulation and relative performances of two kinds of serpentine springs,” Journal of Micromechanics and Mtcroengineering, 15 (2005) 738-748. |
Jeon, Sungeun K. et al, “Structural determinancy and design implications for tensioned precision deployable structures,” AIAA paper #2013-1524, 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Apr. 8-11, 2013, Boston, Massachusetts. |
Reynolds, Whitney et al, “Advanced Folding Approaches for Deployable Spacecraft Payloads,” Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2013, Aug. 4-7, 2013, Portland, Oregon, USA. |