Printers, copiers, and other image forming apparatuses can print on a variety of media. The input trays of such devices are designed to accommodate various types of media that may vary in size, thickness, weight, moisture content, beam strength, tendency to curl, surface properties, etc.
Image forming apparatuses typically include a media handling system that feeds multiple types of media through the image forming apparatus in a reliable manner. Media handling system failures may cause damaged sheets and machine shutdowns. Such failures may be caused by any number of factors. For example, inserting too much media into the image forming apparatus may disrupt the feeding process of the media handling system. Therefore, the amount of media that is fed into the machine should be controlled.
Conventional image forming apparatuses employ stationary media stack height limiters to prevent an operator from overloading the media tray, and therefore to control the amount of media inserted into the tray. By limiting the height of the media stack, stack height limiters help prevent mis-feeds, multi-feeds, or fail-to-feeds of media into the image forming apparatus. However, while conventional stack height limiters may prevent too much media from being inserted into the media tray, these limiters do not account for height variations in the media due to environmental changes, such as temperature and humidity, which may cause the media in the tray to expand. Even though the stack height was initially limited, swelling caused by these environmental changes may alter the height of the stack, causing the height to become too great to allow smooth handling of media.
When the media stack height increases beyond a desirable limit due to environmental change, stationary stack height limiters may cause a pinch point in the media at the position where the stack height limiter contacts the media. Pinch points lead to mis-feeds and fail-to-feeds of media which bind or jam the image forming apparatus. Problems with feeding the media into the image forming apparatus cause less than optimum machine performance and increase machine downtime. As a result, the increased likelihood of paper jams under certain environmental conditions is a great disadvantage of stationary media stack height limiters.
The present invention is a method and apparatus for limiting the height of media inserted into an image forming apparatus while also allowing for media expansion due to environmental conditions. An exemplary stack height limiting system according to the present invention comprises an elongated arm with a first end spaced from a second end, where the arm is movable between first and second positions. A limiter positioned relative to the arm defines the first position, wherein in the first position, the first end is oriented at a predefined insertion height to prevent the insertion of excess media. As a result, the first end of the elongated arm is spaced a fixed distance from the bottom surface of a media tray when the stack height limiting system is in the first position.
In an exemplary embodiment, the limiter comprises an extension that extends outwardly from the elongated arm and into an opening comprising first and second boundaries. The extension moves within the opening to enable the elongated arm to move between the first and second positions. When the extension contacts the first boundary, the device is in the first position. As a result, a first gap forms between the first end, also referred to herein as a striking surface, and the bottom surface of the media tray. When in the first position, the striking surface may have a substantially perpendicular orientation relative to the bottom surface of the media tray. As the extension moves within the opening, a second larger gap is formed between the striking end and the bottom surface of the media tray.
An exemplary method according to the present invention comprises inserting a first volume of media into the media tray of an image forming apparatus. While the media is inserted, a controller oriented in a first position prevents the insertion of additional media beyond a second volume that is greater than or equal to the first volume. When the media in the tray expands beyond the second volume, the controller moves to a second position.
Another exemplary method comprises positioning a controller having an elongated shape with first and second ends in a first position such that the distance between the first end and a bottom surface of a media tray defines a first gap. When media is inserted into the tray, the first end of the controller blocks media having a height greater than the first gap to prevent the insertion of media beyond the first gap. Once inserted, the media may expand beyond the first gap due to environmental conditions. In response, the controller moves to a second position based on the media expansion such that the distance between the bottom surface of the tray and the first end defines a second gap larger than the first gap.
The present invention is directed towards movable stack height limiters that account for height variations in media disposed in a media tray of an image forming apparatus. As used herein, an image forming apparatus or device may be any device that transfers an image onto media fed through the device. Such devices include, but are not limited to, printers, copiers, and facsimile machines.
Media sheets are fed into the media path 20 using one or more registration rollers 22 disposed along the media path 20 to align the media sheet and precisely control its further movement. A media transport belt 24 forms a section of the media path 20 for moving the media sheets past a plurality of image forming units (not shown) to form an image on the media sheet. As the media moves past the image forming units, an imaging device (not shown) forms an electrical charge on a photoconductive member within the image forming units as part of the image formation process, as is well understood in the art. The media sheet with loose toner is then moved through a fuser 32 that adheres the toner to the media sheet. Exit rollers 34 rotate in a forward direction to move the media sheet to an output tray 35, or rollers 34 rotate in a reverse direction to move the media sheet to a duplex path 36. The duplex path 36 directs the inverted media sheet back through the image formation process for forming an image on a second side of the media sheet. Examples of image forming devices having a similar structure include Model Nos. C750 and C752 both available from Lexmark International, Inc. of Lexington, Ky.
As shown in
In any event, extension 50 fits within an opening 52 disposed in the wall 54, while control end 46 operates as a pivot point that is pivotally secured to the wall 54. As shown in
The arm 42 of the stack height limiting system 40 is biased towards the limiting position. In one embodiment, the system 40 has an offset center of gravity, generally referred to herein with reference number 49, to bias the arm 42 towards the limiting position. Further, extension 50 rests against the bottom or limiting edge of opening 52 forming a gap between the bottom of the media tray 14 and the striking end 44. This gap is equal to the amount of media that can be inserted into the input tray 14, referred to as height H as illustrated in
As discussed above, media disposed in the tray 14 may expand and contract due to changes in environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, etc. The present invention prevents pinch points from forming between the media and the stack height limiter by enabling the arm 42 to adjust along with the changing height of the media in the media tray 14. In so doing, the present invention may also prevent pinch points between the media and pick mechanism 16, which may prevent pick defects. To that end, when the media height swells beyond the predetermined insertion height H, the media stack pushes upwardly on striking end 44, causing extension 50 to move within opening 52, while the arm 42 rotates about pivot end 46, as shown in
In the embodiments of
In addition, it will be appreciated that stack height limiting systems 40 having different shapes and/or limiters may be implemented according to the present invention. For example, extension 50 may be a rod having a cylindrical shape that extends from arm 42 into a curved opening, as shown in
Further, as shown in
In the embodiments of
The above describes a stack height limiting system 40 that includes an opening 52 and an extension 50 to define the boundaries of the limiting and expansion positions. However, the present invention is not limited to these types of stack height limiting systems 40. Spring loaded stack height limiting systems 40 may also be used, as illustrated in
For example, FIGS. 9 and 10A–10B illustrate a spring loaded stack height limiting system 40 having an elongated arm 42 with a striking end 44, a control end 46 opposite the striking end 44, and a blocking surface 48 relative to the bottom of the media tray 14. The stack height limiting system 40 also includes a spring 58 positioned between the control end 46 and an inner ceiling 55 associated with the image forming apparatus 10. The inner ceiling 55 may be part of the input tray 14, or may be within the cavity 18 of the image forming apparatus body 12.
As media is inserted into the media tray 14, blocking surface 48 blocks media exceeding the predetermined insertion height H from being inserted into media tray 14. To prevent unnecessary strain on spring 58 and/or to prevent the excess media from moving the elongated arm 42 in the direction of the media insertion, the illustrated stack height limiting system 40 may include a limiter 56 extending from either a sidewall of the media tray 14 or an interior sidewall of the media tray cavity 18. Further, when the height of the media disposed in the media tray 14 exceeds the predetermined insertion height H, the media pushes upwardly on the striking end 44, causing spring 58 to compress to accommodate the changing height of the media. In this embodiment, the maximum compression and the maximum expansion of spring 58 may define the boundaries of the limiting position (
Limiter 56 may further comprise a cutout in wall 54 as illustrated in
It will be appreciated that when the media tray 14 is inserted into image forming apparatus 10, the striking end 44 of arm 42 is spaced from the bottom of the media tray 14 by a gap defined by the predetermined insertion height. As media disposed in the media tray 14 expands beyond the predetermined insertion height, the arm 42 moves upwardly, which increases the gap between the bottom of the media tray 14 and the striking end 44. However, when the media height decreases to a height less than the predetermined insertion height, the arm 42 maintains the first gap spacing, and therefore, separates from the media stack.
The stack height limiting system 40 described herein moves as media disposed in the tray 14 expands to prevent pinch points between the media and the stack height limiting system 40. However, the present invention may also be implemented using a stack height limiting system 40 having an arm 42 that moves away from the limiting position and into a second position when the media tray 14 is inserted into the inner cavity 18. For example, the arm 42 may rotate away from the media responsive to the media tray being inserted into the input cavity. In this embodiment, the arm 42 in the second position is separated from the media, where the second position may be in an inner section of the main body 12 or in an unused portion of the media tray 14. In so doing, the arm 42 moves completely out of the way of the media and the media path while the tray resides in the inner cavity 18. In this embodiment, arm 42 stays in the second position as long as the media tray 14 resides in input cavity 18.
The above describes a movable stack height limiter for limiting the height of media inserted into an image forming apparatus 10 while also allowing for the inserted media to expand due to changing environmental conditions. While several different exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described herein, the present invention may be carried out in other specific ways than those set forth herein without departing from the scope and essential characteristics of the invention. While not explicitly shown, in the embodiments illustrated in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3955811 | Gibson | May 1976 | A |
4635919 | Habich et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4832329 | Rodi et al. | May 1989 | A |
5171007 | Kasprzak et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5205550 | Perino | Apr 1993 | A |
5207416 | Soler | May 1993 | A |
5273271 | Intemann | Dec 1993 | A |
5286018 | Rasmussen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5700003 | Sung | Dec 1997 | A |
5944307 | Yim | Aug 1999 | A |
5992843 | Lee | Nov 1999 | A |
6050565 | Fetherolf | Apr 2000 | A |
6135436 | Hur | Oct 2000 | A |
6206362 | Tan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217018 | Tay et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6409165 | Yamaoka et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6478294 | Hiratani | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6592119 | Goldbeck et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05116802 | May 1993 | JP |
05186093 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06100179 | Apr 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060043665 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |