The invention relates to planar solid oxide fuel cell stacks and, more particularly, to a planar-solid oxide fuel cell stack design which increases the footprint of the stack.
It is essential from a cost reduction standpoint to increase the footprint of the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack in the plane of the cell. One approach to achieve increased in-plane footprint is to manufacture and use SOFC cells that are bigger in length and/or width in the stack. Manufacturing ceramic SOFC cells of increased dimensions and maintaining them within acceptable tolerances is fundamentally difficult. At this time, several cell manufacturers produce 4″×4″ (10 cm×10 cm) cells within acceptable dimensional tolerances. Cell manufacturers are presently attempting to produce 8″×8″ (20 cm×20 cm) cells within acceptable tolerances. Acceptable tolerances are needed to prevent cell fracture during assembly and operation of the stack. Fundamentally, from a ceramics processing standpoint further increases in size are extremely difficult and probably not cost effective. In addition, the use of larger cells raises thermal management concerns during electrochemical operation since the temperature across the cell increases with increasing in-plane cell dimension. Prior art stack designs typically use bonded glass seals and/or non-compliant interconnects and, therefore, are not easily amenable to in-plane foot print scale-up.
It is clear that the need exists for a fuel cell stack structure which reliably provides for in-plane foot print scale up, and it is the primary object of the present invention to provide such a structure.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will appear herein below.
According to the invention, the foregoing objects and advantages have been readily attained.
According to the invention a fuel cell stack is provided which is formed of repeating cell units, wherein each cell unit comprises: a fuel cell having a trilayer structure of an anode electrode, an electrolyte, and a cathode electrode; an anode side frame; a cathode side frame; a bipolar plate having an anode side interconnect adjacent to the anode side frame and a cathode side interconnect adjacent to a cathode side frame of an adjacent cell unit; a cathode side seal between the fuel cell and the cathode side frame; and an anode side seal between the fuel cell and the anode side frame, wherein at least one of the anode side interconnect, anode side seal, cathode side interconnect, and cathode side seal are compliant, or pairs of anode side interconnect and anode side seal may be compliant and pairs of cathode side interconnect and cathode side seals may be compliant.
According to the present invention, the anode side frame has one or more openings into which are seated one or more fuel cells. Each of these openings includes a groove, or recessed landing, along the perimeter thereof. The anode side seal and fuel cell both seat in the recessed land of the anode frame opening, and the anode electrode of the fuel cell faces the anode seal. The cathode side frame and cathode side seal include one or more openings, these openings being coincident with the openings in the anode side frame.
Use of compliant seals and interconnects allows for a floating fuel cell which is more likely to resist stresses even at large in-plane foot prints, and also allows for avoidance of cell fracture from excessive compressive loads on the cell as well.
A detailed description of preferred embodiments of the present invention follows, with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
The invention relates to a fuel cell assembly and, more particularly, to a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack having improved compliant interconnects and/or seals.
While the 3D compliant stack (i.e., compliant in all three orthogonal axes) of the present invention can inherently tolerate larger cell dimensional variations and thereby allow the use of larger cells of lower dimensional quality than prior art systems, the 3D compliant stack also enables in-plane foot print scale-up in ways not achieved before. The main reason for increased in-plane foot print scale-up capability is that the stack is 3D compliant through at least one of, and preferably all of, compliant interconnects, compliant seals and resulting floating cells. As a result, dimensional variations that exist from one cell to another can be tolerated, because the compliant design limits local bending stresses to avoid fracture of the brittle ceramic cell. Floating, as used herein, means mechanically decoupled so that forces are not transferred from one component to another. For example, floating may be achieved by permitting relative motion between portions of the structure.
In addition, the seals are floating and do not bond to the mating surfaces. As a result, thermal gradients in the cell as well as thermal stresses during transient conditions are accommodated by relative movement, or sliding, in the seal area.
Compliant structures are described in greater detail in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/758,843, filed Jan. 16, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. Compliant seals are further described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/622,881, filed Jul. 18, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
This invention provides a stack design having the ability for increased in-plane footprint and thereby enables cost effective scale-up of SOFC stacks. As an added benefit, the stack design permits cooling channels to be built integral to the assembly thereby minimizing thermal gradients across the cell and enhancing stack structural robustness and electrochemical stability.
A fuel cell stack may be formed of repeating cell units, wherein each cell unit comprises: a fuel cell having a trilayer structure of an anode electrode, an electrolyte, and a cathode electrode; an anode side frame; a cathode side frame; a bipolar plate having an anode side interconnect adjacent to the anode side frame and a cathode side interconnect adjacent to a cathode side frame of an adjacent cell unit; a cathode side seal between the fuel cell and the cathode side frame; and an anode side seal between the fuel cell and the anode side frame, wherein at least one of the anode side interconnect, anode side seal, cathode side interconnect, and cathode side seal are compliant, or pairs of anode side interconnect and anode side seal may be compliant and pairs of cathode side interconnect and cathode side seals may be compliant.
According to the present invention, the anode slide frame has one or more openings into which are seated one or more fuel cells. Each of these openings includes a groove, or recessed landing, along the perimeter thereof. The anode side seal and fuel cell seat in the recessed land of the anode frame opening, and the anode electrode of the fuel cell faces the anode seal. The cathode side frame and cathode side seal include one or more openings, these openings being coincident with the openings in the anode side frame.
In the stack assembly process, thin layers of contact or bonding material may be used between the anode electrode of fuel cell 14 and the anode side interconnect so as to improve electron transfer and minimize the interface ohmic resistance. Similarly, thin layers of contact or boding material may be used between the fuel call electrode and cathode side interconnect.
While
The window-frame stack design shown in
The stack in-plane foot print and the fuel cells are illustrated in the figures and described in the example as of a substantially square, ‘2×2’ array, geometry. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the fuel cell arrangement in a window frame architecture can be a ‘M×N’ array, wherein ‘M’ fuel cells are disposed in one direction and ‘N’ fuel cells are disposed in a substantially orthogonal direction and all the space is filled.
In another embodiment, the stack may have an in-plane foot print geometry that is rectangular (as with a 4×2 cell arrangement). In another embodiment, the stack consists of rectangular cells arranged in an equal matrix (e.g. 4×4) or non-equal matrix (e.g. 4×2). In another embodiment, the stack may have a substantially circular or oval in-plane foot print and may use substantially circular or oval shaped cells. Although 4×4 and 4×2 matrices are used as examples, the in-plane foot print may be of any number of cells. Those skilled in the art will realize numerous alternate ways to arrange the cells and the in-plane footprint. These commonly known alternate methods are also covered by the invention.
The invention disclosed herein may serve to reduce stack cost, permit multiple cells to be assembled to increase stack in-plane foot print using a window frame type architecture, permit flow of cooling fluids to mitigate thermal gradients and manage thermals across the in-plane footprint. The planar SOFC stack design disclosed in this invention enables the fabrication of larger name plate capacity stacks and leads to the assembly of large capacity integrated energy systems such as cooling heat and power (CHP) products for commercial buildings and SOFC gas turbine hybrid systems of high efficiency for distributed generation of electric power.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the illustrations described and shown herein, which are deemed to be merely illustrative of the best modes of carrying out the invention, and which are susceptible of modification of form, size, arrangement of parts and details of operation. The invention rather is intended to encompass all such modifications that are within its spirit and scope as set forth in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/506,936, filed Sep. 29, 2003.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/032038 | 9/29/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/27/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/034277 | 4/14/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5238754 | Yasuo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5312700 | Ishida | May 1994 | A |
5460897 | Gibson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
6656625 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6794075 | Steele et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7045237 | Sridhar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7135248 | Finn et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144651 | Finn et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7255956 | McElroy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020025458 | Faville et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030096147 | Badding et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030162067 | McElroy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030170527 | Finn et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224237 | Vanderleeden et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224238 | Finn et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235746 | Haltiner, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040151968 | Warrier et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040200187 | Warrier et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 750 798 | Jan 1997 | EP |
H03149759 | Jun 1991 | JP |
2001068132 | Mar 2001 | JP |
9617394 | Jun 1996 | WO |
03071618 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action Dated Aug. 17, 2007, for Chinese Patent Application No. 2004800346362. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2006-528328 dated Feb. 17, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060210858 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60506936 | Sep 2003 | US |