The present invention relates generally to an apparatus and method for reducing the cost and complexity of the fuselage barrel section of an aircraft and more particularly to an apparatus and method for integrating a cost effective and compliant structure that absorbs energy during bird strike impact.
Aircraft structures often provide complex and costly challenges to both design and manufacturing. The underlying structures must not only meet strength requirements, but must also survive constant weight reduction requirements and manufacturing cost and time restraints. As such, a reanalysis and creative investigation into existing structures bears the possible reward of considerable benefits during implementation.
Such is the case with the fuselage section of the aircraft. Specifically the forward section commonly referred to as section 41. This fuselage section includes complex geometry and structure by way of the inclusion of both the nose section as well as the cockpit windows and similar features. Additionally, this portion of the aircraft comes under close scrutiny for its ability to have bird strike resistance. As such, section 41 barrel sections are often over designed which may lead to excess weight and more commonly excess cost.
Present fuselage sections are commonly are centered around designs that are stout and heavy. Often the outer skin and other structural supports are formed from aluminum which when overloaded may result in costly damage or repair. Bird strike incidents, even on designs that are not overloaded, may leave large dents in the aluminum structure that eventually require costly repairs. When overloaded, however, portions of the aluminum structure may rupture requiring extremely expensive repair or replacement. The aluminum skin also requires complex manufacturing and assembly as the skin is commonly backed by very heavy and complex beam structures. Structures such as stringers are required for support and add both considerable cost in addition to weight to the aircraft. The complex curvatures of the skins, especially in the nose region, often require manufacturing using expensive computer controlled machines. The quantity and complexity of manufacturing and assembling these aluminum structures often make section 41 the most expensive barrel section in the entire aircraft body.
What is needed is a design and method for manufacturing this complex section of the fuselage that allowed for simplification of manufacturing while simultaneously allowing for a compliant approach to bird strike resistance. Additionally, it would be highly desirable to have such a design and method that provided opportunities to reduce section weight in addition to manufacturing costs.
In accordance with the present invention an aircraft stringerless fuselage structure is provided comprising an impact compliant outer skin having a plurality of resin impregnated skin fibers forming an outer skin surface, an inner stringerless skin surface, and a skin thickness. A plurality of stiffeners is included, each comprising a plurality of resin impregnated stiffener fibers integrated into the inner stringerless skin structure. The plurality of resin-impregnated skin fibers are not aligned with the plurality of resin impregnated stiffener fibers.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent when viewed in light of the detailed description and preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the attached drawings and claims.
Referring now to
The present invention accomplishes both weight savings and bird strike protection through a unique combination of the use of a uniquely bird strike compliant outer skin 16 (impact resistant) that allows a redirection of bird path without damage in combination with the integration therein of a plurality of stiffener members 18, preferably circumferentially orientated, that provide sufficient structural support of the skin 16 without debonding during bird strike and without diminishing the skin compliance. It should be understood that in addition to pure circumferential orientation, perpendicular to the axis, variations of angled circumferential orientation, including intersecting stiffeners angled relative to the axis, are contemplated. The present invention contemplates the use of an impact resistant outer skin 16 that is tailored to be compliant and absorb or redirect the impact of bird strikes. The present invention accomplishes this through the use of a skin 16 formed from a plurality of resin impregnated skin fibers 20 forming a skin 16 having an outer skin surface 22, an inner stringerless skins surface 24, and a skin thickness 26. It is contemplated that the plurality of impregnated skin fibers 20 is intended to include both pre-preg tape or dry fibers with infused resin.
A key characteristic, however, is that the skin thickness 26 is contemplated to be variable to accommodate the strength requirements of differing bird impact zones or structural zones (such as the cockpit windows 14) of the barrel section 10. It is contemplated that skin thickness 26 be variable between the range of 0.08 inches and 0.25 inches to provide the proper strength to weight ration. It is contemplated that the skin 16 be formed using high strain fibers such as Spectra® fibers, Vectran™ fibers, low modulus graphite (GR), or even fiberglass. These fibers are chosen to provide a compliant structure that instead of crushing or rupturing during impact, instead deforms and deflect the bird trajectory. Additional contemplated feature include the use of hybrid laminates wherein two or more fiber types are utilized in order to achieve the desired strength/compliance characteristics. One specific embodiment contemplates that the skin 16 be formed using an intermediate modulus (22-25 MSI) toughened carbon pre-preg tape. It is further contemplated that the use of 0/45/90 degree laminate mixture at 20/80/0 percentage ratios provides the preferably structural characteristics for the skin 16. The present invention contemplates the use of non-traditional fiber angles in laminates to achieve the desired strength/conformity properties.
By designing an impact conforming (resistant) outer skin 16 with unique construction and properties, the present invention paves the way for elimination of the need for stringers in the barrel section 10. This saves weight in addition to manufacturing costs. The present invention, instead, relies on the use of low profile and low modulus stiffener members 18 such as the hat frame assembly 28 illustrated in
In one embodiment of the hat frame assembly 28, the hat frame includes a first frame foot 32 and a second frame foot 34. A first angled sidewall 36 and second angled sidewall 38 proceed out of their respective feet and extend toward a hat top portion 40 joining the sidewalls 36,38. This hat frame thereby defines a hat frame interior 42 which is located between the hat top 40 and the outer skin 16 when the feet 32, 34 are bonded to the inner stringerless skin surface 34. Although a variety of hat frames are contemplated, one embodiment contemplates a frame wall thickness 44 of approximately 0.05 inches. This, in combination with the low profile helps provide the low modulus characteristics suitable for impact protection and stringerless support.
The hat frame assembly 28 can further include one or more cap elements 46 integrated into the hat top portion 40 of the hat frame assembly 28. As is illustrated, one embodiment contemplates the use of a pair of vertically stacked cap elements. The cap elements 46 are preferably low density caps such as fiberglass caps or preferably S-2 glass plies. In one embodiment it is contemplated that the cap comprise a cap width 48 between the range of 0.08 inches and 0.15 inches. It is desirable that the cap elements 46 be comprised of 0 degree laminates interleaved with the resin impregnated stiffener fibers 30 (see
The present invention, in addition to providing a vastly improved structure and approach to bird strike damage reduction, also provides a vastly improved methodology of manufacturing and assembling the aircraft fuselage section. Prior approaches required the use of aluminum skin with complex multi-curved shapes and corresponding beam stringers with matching curves. The present invention, however, yields a far more cost effective and efficient method of manufacturing and assembly. The present invention contemplates the use of a fuselage lay-up tool 52 incorporating a plurality of multi-curved shapes 54 along its length. The lay-up tool 52 includes a plurality of stiffener grooves 56 on its upper tool surface 58. The stiffener grooves 56 are configured to allow the low modulus stiffener fibers 30 to be laid up directly onto the grooves 56 and thereby form a hat frame assembly 28 or other stiffener member 18. The stiffener grooves 56 further allow the stiffener members 18 to be located precisely in relation to both each other and the overall fuselage section 10. The skin fibers 20 may then be laid-up over the low modulus stiffener fibers 30 to complete the integrated skin/frame assembly and then the whole assembly may be cured as a single entity. This contemplates co-curing where the stiffener fibers 30 are laid in green, the skin fibers 20 are applied on top, and the whole assembly is simultaneously cured. This further contemplates co-bonding wherein the stiffener fibers 30 are cured prior to the application of the skin fibers 20. This allows the fuselage to be created as a single entity with double curved or multi-curved characteristics. Thereby complex skin shapes are accommodated in addition to the bonding of complex frames concurrently. This has the potential for generating both savings as well as performance improvements to fuselage design and production.
While the invention has been described in connection with one or more embodiments, it is to be understood that the specific mechanisms and techniques which have been described are merely illustrative of the principles of the invention, numerous modifications may be made to the methods and apparatus described without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1932430 | Weyerbacher | Oct 1933 | A |
2420292 | Baer et al. | May 1947 | A |
2762419 | Prewitt | Sep 1956 | A |
3490983 | Lee | Jan 1970 | A |
3768760 | Jensen | Oct 1973 | A |
3995080 | Cogburn et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4051290 | Jutte et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4086378 | Kam et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4331723 | Hamm | May 1982 | A |
4636422 | Harris et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4909655 | Anderson | Mar 1990 | A |
4966802 | Hertzberg | Oct 1990 | A |
5106568 | Honka | Apr 1992 | A |
5139405 | Krone et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5165627 | Amano et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5170967 | Hamamoto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5223067 | Hamamoto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5242523 | Willden et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5622733 | Asher | Apr 1997 | A |
5641366 | Hohman | Jun 1997 | A |
5707576 | Asher | Jan 1998 | A |
6007894 | Barnes et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6105902 | Pettit | Aug 2000 | A |
6132542 | Cutler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155450 | Vasiliev et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6458309 | Allen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6510961 | Head et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511570 | Matsui | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6612217 | Shockey et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641893 | Suresh et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6692681 | Lunde | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702911 | Toi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719865 | Kasahara et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6951162 | Shockey et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7052572 | Miura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059034 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074474 | Toi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7100871 | Assler et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7195203 | Livingstone et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7226559 | Maxwell et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249943 | Benson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7377752 | Mohamed | May 2008 | B2 |
20010035118 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020069962 | Maxwell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020192467 | Secrist et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040070108 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050211843 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060208135 | Liguore et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290028 | Pleite et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1134069 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2004011169 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Feder Aviation Regulation Part 25, Mar. 31, 1998, http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory—and—Guidance—Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/7385FBFAE1021F328525667200503E10?OpenDocument&Highlight=bird, Sec. 25.571. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070095982 A1 | May 2007 | US |