This application is a national stage application, filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371, of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2020/059925, filed on Apr. 7, 2020, which claims the priority of German Patent Application, Serial No. 10 2019 205 940.6, filed Apr. 25, 2019, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
The invention relates to a component handling device for component handling in working or process machines, such as injection moulding machines, and to an injection moulding machine equipped therewith.
The problem of the prior art underlying the invention is to be explained in more detail using the example of an injection moulding machine. Currently common handling devices for component removal in injection moulding machines, such as are currently also used by the applicant, are generally based on 4-axis linear robots which have three translational axes and at least one, but also up to three rotational axes. Such a handling device, as is also known, for example, as a gantry robot for supplying machine tools with tools and workpieces from DE 41 27 446 A1, is shown in
The aforementioned type of handling device has various disadvantages. For example, the three translational axes T1T2T3 are generally designed as open guides with a so-called loss lubrication, which entails a high risk of contamination of the tool or the components manufactured therein. This is particularly true for the two axes of the handling device 1′ which are cyclically located directly above and/or in the tool and component depositing region. In order to achieve at least five degrees of freedom of these handling devices, two additional rotational axes R1R2 are required, which are arranged at the end of the kinematic chain consisting of the three linear axes T1T2T3, that is to say at the third translational axis T3. These two rotational axes R1R2 must therefore be moved along with each movement of the third translational axis T3 in the earth gravity field, which leads to a high energy input with a correspondingly unfavourable energy balance.
Furthermore, the arrangement of the rotational axis/axes on the third linear axis leads to an increased tendency to oscillation due to a pendulum effect, which may have to be counteracted by a payload reduction on the third translational axis.
If, in such a linear robot, the second translational axis T2 is designed as a rigid boom 7′ which can be moved on the first translational axis T1 and on which the third translational axis T3 moves vertically, there is a considerable risk of collision with this boom 7′ when the component is removed from the open injection moulding tool, in particular for components which are long in the vertical direction. Such a collision situation between the hatched elongated component BT and this boom 7′ is shown in
Furthermore, the limited cubic robot working space of this handling device 1′ remains unchanged by adding further rotational degrees of freedom, thus cannot be enlarged thereby, since only the orientation of the gripping tool is changed by these rotational degrees of freedom.
In another prior art, as given by the obvious prior use of the company Automations-und Qualitätssysteme AG, Bendererstrasse 33, 9494 Schaan, FL in the form of the handling device “AQS-P 120 rotary arm robot”, a kinematic chain is formed from a translational axis, a rotational axis rotatably arranged thereon, a second translational axis arranged thereon in an orthogonal direction to the first translational axis, and at least two further rotational axes on the second translational axis. In brief, this arrangement is thus to be indicated by T1R1T2R2R3.
Here, similar disadvantages arise as with the first-mentioned arrangement T1T2T3R1. The replacement of the second translational axis T2 there by the two parallel rotational axes Wand R2 in front of and behind the translational axis T2 has the effect that, due to the arrangement of the second rotational axis R2 on the vertical translational axis T2, comparatively high masses must again be moved, which has a detrimental effect on the vibration behaviour, energy balance and component load-bearing capacity of the arrangement. Furthermore, with this arrangement, a rotation of R2 alone only causes a change in the orientation of the gripping tool, but no change in the position in space.
Further handling devices, in particular for the use with a moulding machine, are shown in DE 10 2014 014 265 A1 or US 2012/0294961 A1. In these known devices, an axis arrangement with a translational, horizontal base axis T1, two rotational axes R1 vand R2 directed parallel thereto and a translational vertical axis T2 is used. In the first-mentioned document, the axis order is T1R1R2T2, and in the second-mentioned document, T1T2R1R2. Both designs have in common that the two rotational axes R1R2 are forcibly coupled about a horizontal axis for position and orientation adjustment of the object to be gripped, thus in this respect no real separate degrees of freedom are created by the two rotational axes. In addition, the handling space that can be covered by these handling devices is severely limited to the cantilever side of the boom that can be pivoted about the rotational axes.
Another known handling device, such as is known in principle from U.S. Pat. No. 5,802,201 A, for example, is based on a so-called SCARA robot, in which two successive, parallel rotational axes R1 and R2 are followed by a translational axis T1, which can be displaced parallel to these axes, and at least one further rotational axis R3 thereon. In this case, the translational axis T1 is centric to the third rotational axis R3, which necessitates the use of circular guides and ball bearing screws for the movement of these two axes, and these guide and drive elements are now well suited for axial loads, but react in a mechanically sensitive manner to radial loads and impacts, such as occur in particular during component handling in injection moulding tools. Furthermore, the mechanical stiffnesses, travelling distances and speeds that can be achieved or are required for the axis T1 are probably insufficient for the use in injection moulding machines.
As further prior art, reference should be made to CN 108 544 482 A1, in which a linear vertical axis of a SCARA robot is driven by a chain instead of the usual design with a ball bearing screw.
In the SCARA robot known from US 2017/0239810 A1, the first arm of the robot can be lengthened or shortened as desired by using connectors. This allows the arms of the SCARA robot to have different lengths.
The handling devices according to the two above-mentioned documents do not provide any starting points for improvement with regard to the problems described in connection with component handling in injection moulding machines.
The discussion of the state of the art should be concluded with a reference to the possibility of using complex 6-axis industrial robots for the component handling. These have a spherical working space and offer a wide range of payloads. However, in order to have comparable working spaces to a linear robot, these robots must be relatively large in terms of their range, which correspondingly makes it difficult to adapt these devices to small working machines (SGM). Furthermore, the operation requires a high level of training, so that the application is usually only justified for complex tasks.
Applications of such industrial robots—sometimes with fewer axes—are shown, for example, in WO 2018/235430A1 in the form of a polishing system for railway wagons. JP 04115885 A discloses a handling system for workpieces with a manipulation arm having three rotational axes R1R2R3 movable on a linear axis T1. Since this device does not have a linear vertical axis, the boom arms movably driven by the rotational axes would also have to be comparatively long for a sufficiently high handling space. This in turn leads to a higher design effort for the weights of the arms to be kept under control and, if necessary, losses in the load-bearing capacity of the handling device.
Finally, DE 39 07 331 A1 shows a palletizing robot in which two rotational axes R1R2 are suspended from a translational axis T1 in order to be able to easily reach a lifting table placed underneath the crossmember with the axis T1 for palletizing printed products. However, such a construction basically cannot be used for handling workpieces that are to be removed from an injection moulding machine, for example, since the space under the crossmember is occupied by the mould plates of the injection moulding machine.
Given the described problems of the prior art, it is an object of the invention to provide a component handling device for component handling in working or process machines, which is improved without practical additional mechanical effort with respect to a wide variety of properties, such as lower susceptibility to lubricant contamination, lower risk of collision during component removal, greater flexibility during component removal, higher payload and energy efficiency, larger working space and many more.
This object is achieved by a component handling device for component handling in working or process machines, in particular injection moulding machines. Accordingly, the object of the invention comprises in its basic concept
In the axis nomenclature introduced at the beginning, the arrangement according to the invention is to be indicated as T1R1R2T2. Here, the second translational axis T2 in the arrangement T1T2T3R1 described at the beginning is replaced by the two rotational axes R1R2, which are arranged in parallel succession at a distance above the first robot arm. Further, the arrangement of the second, vertical translational axis T2 in the arrangement T1R1R2T2 according to the invention is carried out by the second robot arm eccentrically to the rotational axis R2, whereby the translational axis can carry out a generally circular movement about the second rotational axis. Thus, an orientation change of the gripping tool combined with a position change is possible. This eliminates the need to use mechanically sensitive ball bearing screws as combined axial-rotational axes for an orientation change of the gripping tool, as is the case with the SCARA robots described at the beginning.
Since in the arrangement according to the invention the second rotational axis R2 guides only the second linear axis T2 over the handling space, the number of open lubrication points there is thus reduced by a ratio of 2 to 1 compared with the prior art, and thus the risk of contamination is considerably reduced.
Compared to the kinematic chains T1T2T3R1 and T1R1T2R2R3 discussed at the beginning, in the object of the invention, the arrangement of the rotational axis R2 in front of the translational axis T2 in the kinematic chain does not increase the tendency to oscillate due to the aforementioned pendulum effect and thus there is no payload reduction at the translational axis T2. This results in an improved energy balance.
Due to the eccentric link of the vertical linear axis T2 to the handling device according to the invention, there is no collision contour on the structure supporting the gripping tool so that, in particular in the case of long, vertical components, their handling cannot be disturbed.
A further advantage of the axis conception according to the invention is the extension of the working space thus obtained, which, for example, may extend in an oval shape around the entire linear axis T1 with respect to the kinematic chain T1T2T3R1, whereby the working space is extended laterally and also rearwardly without the basic dimensions of the robot structure having to increase.
From the foregoing, it becomes clear that a plurality of advantages over prior art handling robot concepts are achievable by the component handling device design according to the invention using the kinematic chain T1R1R2T2.
Preferred further embodiments of the component handling device according to the invention are indicated further on. For instance, the basic linear axis T1 runs sensibly horizontally, wherein in the application of the handling device for component removal from an injection moulding machine the basic linear axis T1 can be arranged in different arrangements relative to the working space of the injection moulding machine, such as, for example, transversely or parallel to the clamping direction of the injection moulding machine, on the operator or non-operator side of same and on the fixed tool clamping plate or in the region of the movable tool clamping plate. This ensures optimum adaptability of the handling space to the spatial conditions in a production hall and accessibility of the handling space between the open tool clamping plates and laterally thereof for depositing the components removed from the mould.
In a preferred further development of the object of the invention, the effective length of the first robot arm may be a multiple, in particular at least three times, preferably at least four times, particularly preferably at least five times, the effective length of the second robot aim. Due to this length, in conjunction with the displaceability of the first rotational axis along the first translational axis, a comparatively large area can be covered by the handling device.
In an advantageous manner, the vertical linear axis T2 linked to the second robot arm may further comprise a guide fixedly attached to the second robot arm, in which a vertical guide crossmember is displaceably mounted. This effectively prevents a risk of collision of a component held on the gripping tool with a structure of the handling device.
In order to achieve five degrees of freedom in the handling device according to the invention, in contrast to the kinematic chains T1T2T3R1 and T1R1T2R2R3 according to the prior art, it is sufficient to add a pivot rotational axis at the lower end of the vertical linear axis. Each time the latter moves in the earth gravity field, only this rotational axis has to be moved along with it, which in turn benefits an improved energy balance.
Finally, the invention relates to an injection moulding machine comprising an injection unit, a clamping unit having a fixed tool clamping plate and a movable tool clamping plate, and a handling device according to the invention discussed above.
Further features, details and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of an exemplary embodiment with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As becomes clear from
A vertical linear axis T2, to be discussed in greater detail with reference to
With the aid of the handling device 1 shown in
In
The vertical linear axis T2 is arranged at the free end of the second robot arm 12. As can be seen in particular from
As becomes clear from
In
In
Partial figure A corresponds to
In partial figure B, the entire arrangement is mirrored about the central axis of the injection moulding machine when the longitudinal guide 8 is arranged transversely to the clamping direction SR, so that the component is deposited on the operator side BS of the injection moulding machine. In this arrangement, the machine operator 21 indicated in the drawing is protected by appropriate measures, such as a grid enclosure or the like.
In the arrangement according to partial figure C, the longitudinal guide 8 is positioned parallel to the clamping direction SR of the injection moulding machine on the non-operator side BGS. As a result, spatial constraints in terms of width can be met.
In partial figures D and E, the longitudinal guide 8 of the handling device 1 is elevated transversely to the clamping direction SR in each case in the region of the open, movable clamping plate 3 above the latter in such a way that the handling space HR extends either to the non-operator side BGS (
For the sake of completeness, reference should also be made to
In summary, a large number of advantages can be mentioned for the handling device 1 shown, in particular when used on plastic injection moulding machines:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 205 940.6 | Apr 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/059925 | 4/7/2020 | WO | 00 |