1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to armor used for preventing the penetration of structures by projectiles. More specifically, the invention relates to an improved armor including a fiber grid having composite tiles retained in the grid that together provide overall support to the structure being protected while also improving the armor performance of each individual composite tile.
2. Background of the Invention
Armor systems have been known to include thick metal as a skin of a structure being protected. For example, military vehicles have, for several years, included a thick metal plate on their exterior in order to reduce the likelihood of projectile penetration. Such thick metal armor systems while effective can also be extremely heavy and, as such, cause problems relating to vehicle speed, fuel consumption and vehicle assembly.
In some cases, these metal armor systems have been replaced with lighter weight armor systems made from composite materials having reinforced fibers made of, for example, Kevlar, S-2 glass, graphite, or high molecular weight polyethylene. Such armor systems have utilized these multiple layers of composite materials in order to achieve reduced overall weight, and provide sufficient structural properties, while preserving the ability of the armor to provide protection against penetration. For example, some known systems include the use of Kevlar in combination with two outer plates surrounding such Kevlar. Illustrative of such a composite armor system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,648.
Also, armor systems using ceramic plates in connection with a grid are well known in the art as capable of providing protection against penetrating high speed projectiles while providing a reduction in the overall weight of the armor system. The ceramic plates have been known to have convex surfaces. U.S. Pat. No. 6,826,996 discloses convex plates inserted into a honeycomb grid. Upon impact by a projectile into such ceramic plates, it has been known that managing the propagation of cracks from the impacted plate to an adjacent plate is critical.
The prior art grids are made of steel, fiber, or composite materials and are used in connection with holding ceramic plates inserted into openings formed by such grid structures. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,156 discloses a grid structure made of metal strips. The openings have been known to be either blind openings, opening only to one side of the grid, or, through holes, open to both sides of the grid. The openings of such grids have been shaped in many different forms including, for example, squares, triangles, and hexagons. The grid structure is usually designed with a material having an effective acoustic impedance lower than the ceramic plates in order to reduce the propagation of damaging stresses to adjacent ceramic plates.
In order to manage the propagation of such stresses, prior art armor systems have used auxiliary layers of laminate sheet material bonded to the front and the back of the grid structures. In some cases, only one laminate sheet has been bonded to either one of the front or the back of such grid structures. It has been known to make such laminate sheet material out of Kevlar. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,349,893 discloses a composite laminate sheet made of woven fiber in a resinous matrix. Such laminate sheet materials can be bonded to the grid structure with resins.
Illustrative of the prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 6,826,996 assigned to General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. and Mofet Etzion Agricultural Cooperative Association Ltd. The '996 patent discloses a honeycomb grid structure having openings for receiving convex composite plates and a pair of preform sheets secured to both sides of the grid structure. The '996 patent discloses the honeycomb grid as made of material selected from the group consisting of stainless steel, aluminum, aramid sheet, fiber, or fabric.
Testing of such known armor systems having grid structures with composite inserts surrounded by preform sheets has revealed that the propagation of cracks and debris, created during impact, weakens the adjacent composite plates. The propagation of such cracks results from poorly designed grid structures failing to eliminate both crack propagation, debris, and stress wave propagation.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a composite armor that will prevent the penetration of projectiles in a structure while also providing structural support to the same structure.
More specifically, an object of the invention is to provide a composite armor having a one-piece integrally formed composite cellular structure for retaining composite inserts, which in combination with resins and laminates, prevents projectiles from penetrating a structure.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a uniform one-piece composite cellular structure made of continuous fibers providing high tensile strength in order to radially confine composite inserts used in connection with such grid.
Further scope and applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, claims and drawings. However, it should be understood that the specific examples in the detailed description are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given here below, the appended claims, and the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring now to the drawings, an armor system is shown in general at 10 in
The armor system 10 further includes a pair of laminates 26 and 28 secured to the cellular structure 12 and the composite inserts 14. The laminates 26, 28 are secured with the use of a bonding material such as a resin which may also be used as a filler applied on the inserts 14 and, in some cases, around at least a portion of the perimeter portion 25.
Similar to
The cellular structure 12, as shown in
The present invention 10 is generally shown at 100 in
The present invention 10 is assembled according to the following steps. The cellular structure 12 is provided on a fixture used for holding the structure. The inserts 14 are inserted into the openings 20 of the structure 12 and a filler is applied to the inserts 14 including around at least a portion of the perimeter 25 of the inserts 14. At least one of the laminate sheets 26, 28 are applied over the structure 12 having the inserts 14 contained in the openings 20. A bonding resin is applied to the entire structure 12, having the inserts 14 in the openings 20 along with the filler and the laminate sheets, thereby created an assembly which is infused together. In the preferred embodiment, the infusing is achieved through the use of a known process referred to as Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM). Although the VARTM infusion process is preferred, it should be appreciated that other methods of infusion may also be used.
The foregoing discussion discloses and describes an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion, and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the true spirit and fair scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This invention was made with Government support under Agreement No. W911NF-04-2-0032 awarded by ARL. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3616115 | Klimmek | Oct 1971 | A |
3649426 | Gates | Mar 1972 | A |
3828699 | Bowen | Aug 1974 | A |
4061815 | Poole, Jr. | Dec 1977 | A |
4186648 | Clausen et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4198454 | Norton | Apr 1980 | A |
4251579 | Lee et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4292882 | Clausen | Oct 1981 | A |
4307140 | Davis | Dec 1981 | A |
4404889 | Miguel | Sep 1983 | A |
4934245 | Musante et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4953442 | Bartuski | Sep 1990 | A |
4969386 | Sandstrom et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4989493 | Blommer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5032466 | Cappa | Jul 1991 | A |
5045371 | Calkins | Sep 1991 | A |
5114772 | Vives et al. | May 1992 | A |
H1061 | Rozner et al. | Jun 1992 | H |
5221807 | Vives | Jun 1993 | A |
5349893 | Dunn | Sep 1994 | A |
H1434 | Cytron | May 1995 | H |
5456156 | Semple | Oct 1995 | A |
5471905 | Martin | Dec 1995 | A |
5686689 | Snedeker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5733643 | Green | Mar 1998 | A |
5918309 | Bachner, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
5996115 | Mazelsky | Dec 1999 | A |
6009789 | Lyons | Jan 2000 | A |
6253655 | Lyons et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6408733 | Perciballi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408734 | Cohen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6497966 | Cohen | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6532857 | Shih et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6601497 | Ghiorse et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6679157 | Chu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681679 | Vives et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698331 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6703104 | Neal | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6792843 | Mohr et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6826996 | Strait | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6860186 | Cohen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892623 | Benyami et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895851 | Adams et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6955112 | Adams et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7150217 | Kershaw | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20020088340 | Chu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094406 | Cohen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040020353 | Ravid et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050072294 | Cohen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070034074 | Ravid et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070180982 | Dagher et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214951 | Swinson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238379 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080119099 | Palley | May 2008 | A1 |