The present invention relates to baseball bats and more particularly to tubular baseball bats, constructed of a variety of materials, and more particularly to baseball bats designed to improve player performance as defined by greater hitting distance. The invention also provides a novel process for making a bat.
Baseball and softball bats, hereinafter referred to simply as “baseball bats”, are today typically made solely from aluminum alloys, or aluminum alloys in combination with composite materials (hybrid bats), or most recently solely from composite materials. Such bats are tubular (hollow inside) in construction in order to meet the weight requirements of the end user, and have a cylindrical handle portion for gripping, a cylindrical barrel portion for striking, and a tapered mid-section connecting the handle and barrel portions.
When aluminum alloys initially replaced wooden bats in most bat categories, the original aluminum bats were formed as a single member, that is, they were made in a unitary manner as a single-walled aluminum tube for the handle, taper, and barrel portions. Such bats are often called single-wall aluminum bats. More recently (in the mid 1990's), improvements in bat design largely concentrated on bat performance (such as increased hit distance). This has been accomplished primarily by designing the barrel portion of the bat with inner or internal, and outer or external, members; these members are often referred to individually as inserts, sleeves, bodies, shells or frames in the prior art. Such two member bats are often called double-wall bats. Each member is thinner than the single walls of the prior art bats.
The prior art double-wall bats generally refer to improved performance or hit distance as trampoline effect, slugging capacity, spring, compliance, lively, rebound, flexibility, etc. resulting from the double-wall two member construction allowing the barrel portion of the bat to deflect or flex more upon ball impact which propels the ball faster and further than single-wall bats. The main engineering principle, that is, bending theory, for such improved performance is not disclosed nor understood in the prior art. Thus, optimization of hitting performance is not achieved in the prior art.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,303,917 to Uke discloses a two member bat of thermoplastic and composite materials. Such bats made of one or more thermoplastic members have proven to have neither sufficient durability nor performance in actual play.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,095 to Easton discloses a two member bat consisting of an external metal tube and an internal composite sleeve bonded to the inside of the external metal tube making it in effect a single-wall bat. Since the two members cannot flex independently, this is not a high performance bat.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,463B1 to Chauvin discloses the method of tuning a unitary member all composite bat without separation barrier(s) making it a single-wall bat and thus not a high performance bat.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,415,398 to Eggiman discloses a two member metallic bat consisting of a frame and internal insert in a double-wall construction. Further U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,251,034B1 and 6,482,114B1 disclose variations to U.S. Pat. No. 5,415,398. U.S. Pat. No. 6,440,017B1 to Anderson also discloses a two member bat with an outer sleeve and inner shell.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,063,828 to Pitzenberger discloses a two member bat consisting on an internal body and an external shell in a double-wall construction. U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,760B1 to Higginbotham discloses the bat of U.S. Pat. No. 6,053,828 with a composite shell formed to an outer shell. As the composite is bonded to the outer shell this construction acts as a double-wall bat.
Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,836B1 to Mizuno discloses a two member bat with a lubricated coating between layers or a weak boundary layer formed on the surfaces of the inner member. Such a bat may or may not act like a double-wall bat.
U.S. Patent Pub. 2001/0094882 A1 by Clauzin discloses a two member bat consisting of an outer shell and an insert laminate partially bonded to the shell.
While the prior art two member double-wall bats have demonstrated improved performance as claimed, the opportunity for further performance improvement is significant. Also, they provide inconsistent performance improvement along the barrel portion of the bat, and from bat to bat, due to lack of precision resulting from assembling the two unjoined members which invariably results in gaps along the joint. Further, they are very costly due to the multiple manufacturing steps, and this has resulted in a many-fold increase in end user costs.
Therefore, what is needed are single member or unitary double-wall and multi-walled bats which have equal or higher performance than the prior art, which are more consistent in performance, and which are significantly less costly to manufacture.
Therefore, in view of the foregoing, a main object of the present invention is to provide a single member or unitary double-wall baseball bat with more consistent performance and having much lower costs to manufacture than the prior art two member double-wall bats. To achieve this, the bat of the present invention does not include any secondary members such as internal inserts or external sleeves. Such secondary members are costly to manufacture and costly to assemble. Further, upon assembly of such secondary members, the interface of the secondary member to the main bat frame is not precise due to the manufacturing tolerances involved. For example, in one area of the barrel, there may be an interference fit while at an adjoining area there exists a gap. Thus, performance of the bat will not be consistent along the barrel length. The double-wall bat embodiment of the present invention is effectively a single member bat of unitary construction, without any secondary members, the double-wall effect being achieved by a precise thin, separation barrier not bonded to, and located internally within the barrel wall thickness and, at least, along the majority of the barrel length,
Specifically, in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, in a double-wall baseball bat of unitary construction, comprising a cylindrical handle portion for gripping, a cylindrical tubular barrel portion for striking, and a tapered mid-section connecting said handle portion and said barrel portion, a major part of the barrel portion comprises a barrel wall formed by internal and external cylindrical layers of material separated by a separation barrier which is unbonded to at least one of said layers, the separation barrier being in intimate contact with said layers over all of its area.
In accordance with another aspect of this invention, a process for forming the main object baseball bat of unitary construction of the present invention having a barrel portion, a handle portion, and a tapered portion connecting the barrel and the handle portion, the singular process comprises:
wrapping an internal layer of fiber material around a cylindrical mandrel to form an inner layer of a barrel portion of said bat,
wrapping a separation barrier around said internal layer, said barrier being made of material which does not adhere to said internal layer,
wrapping an external layer of fiber material around said separation barrier, said material of the external layer being such as not to adhere to the separation barrier,
impregnating the fiber layers with resin, curing the resin, and withdrawing the mandrel,
the process including forming said handle portion and tapered portion integrally with one or more of said layers.
Further objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description, wherein preferred embodiments of the invention are clearly shown.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention is directed to providing single member tubular baseball bats with equivalent, or higher, and more consistent performance, consisting of a variety of materials constructed and manufactured in a singular or unitary construction (
The prior art bats are shown in
Though not indicated in
Most adult tubular baseball bats have maximum outside barrel portion diameters of either 2.625 or 2.75 inches. Depending on the taper portion geometry of the mid-section 8, the barrel length 1 as defined by constant maximum diameter ranges from a few inches to 12 inches. Barrel wall thickness ranges from 0.100 inches to 0.140 inches for aluminum bats and to 0.220 inches for all composite bats.
Most youth baseball bats and softball bats have maximum outside barrel portion diameters 2 of 2.25 inches. Depending on the taper portion geometry of section 8, the barrel length 1 ranges from a few inches to 16 inches. Barrel wall thickness ranges from 0.060 to 0.090 inches for aluminum bats and to 0.220 inches for all composite bats.
The single member bats of the present invention, shown in
A first embodiment of the present invention
A polymer composite is a non-homogenous material consisting of continuous fibers embedded in, and wetted by, a polymeric resin matrix whereby the properties of the material are superior to those of its constituent fibers and resin taken separately. Such polymer composites are anisotropic materials since they exhibit different responses to stresses applied in different directions depending on how the fibers are aligned within the matrix.
Other materials commonly used in bat constructions such as aluminum, wood and plastics, are not anisotropic and are thus limited in optimizing bat performance. However, with the composite materials which are preferred, properties of bats made in accordance with the present invention, such as strength, stiffness and durability, can be controlled by altering the fiber alignments along the bat.
Generally, the fiber materials used are selected from a group consisting of glass fibers, graphite or carbon, aramid, boron, nylon fibers, or hybrids of any of the foregoing all of which are commercially available. The resins used to impregnate, wet out, and encapsulate or imbed the fiber materials are generally selected from a group consisting of epoxy, polyester, vinyl ester, urethane, or a thermoplastic such as nylon, or mixtures thereof.
The first embodiment
As the first embodiment bat of
The separation barrier 10 of the present invention is typically on the order of 0.003 inches thick with a tolerance of + or −0.002 inches. It is nonstructural in that it does not, of itself, contribute significantly to the stiffness and strength of the barrel portion of the bat. It can be made of a polymeric or plastic material, or waxed paper. The separation baffler 10 is generally easy to conform to the barrel circumference and must not stick to the resin employed and not be wetted-out by the resin in order to provide the double-wall performance benefit.
Another embodiment,
Similarly, another embodiment of the present invention
In the embodiments described in the foregoing and further embodiments to be described, the scientific principle governing improved bat performance is bending theory. When a ball impacts a bat it has kinetic energy that must be absorbed by the bat in order to stop the ball. The bat stores this energy by flexing. After the ball is stopped, the bat returns the energy it stored by rebounding and sending the ball back towards where it came from. The more the bat barrel portion 9 deforms upon ball impact without failing (denting or breaking), the lower the energy loss in the ball, and the greater the energy return to the ball from the bat as the bat barrel portion 9 impacted returns to its original shape.
Bat performance and bat durability features are offsetting. That is, higher performance bats require thinner barrel portion wall thicknesses 6, which are those more prone to denting and breakage due to their thinner walls. Due to bending theory principles, double-wall bats deform more upon ball impact than single-wall bats while remaining relatively durable.
More specifically, in comparing a single wall with a double-wall bat, if both have equal overall thickness, bending theory dictates that the stiffness of a single-wall bat with thickness equal to the total double-wall thickness is four times that of the double-wall bat. This is because stiffness increases with thickness cubed. Each layer of the double-wall bat has half the thickness, and therefore, since there are two walls working together, the stiffness is 2×⅛=¼ or 25% of the single wall bat. This is why double-wall bats are higher performing, or longer hitting, bats than single-wall bats.
Similarly, if more than two walls, for example, three walls, not joined or bonded to each other are employed, bending theory results in a multi-walled bat whose stiffness is 11% of single-wall bat of the same thickness and 44% that of a double-wall bat of the same total thickness. Thus, multi-walled bats, or bats with more than two walls not joined or bonded together, are higher performing bats than double-wall bats of the prior art.
Thus, another preferred embodiment
Following extensive in-house development and testing, an external laboratory specializing in collision dynamics and a university with expertise in frequency analysis were employed to test numerous bats of the present invention. External testing began a number of years ago and continued through early 2003. Eighty-four different bats relating to the present invention were externally tested by shooting baseballs at the bats from a precise cannon or controlled speeds up to 160 mph and recording entrance and exit ball speed. Then coefficients of restitution (ratio of exit to entrance ball speeds) were calculated for each bat construction, which is a direct indicator of bat performance. Conclusive evidence of the superior performance of bats of the present invention was obtained. Further, optimal designs were achieved through the reiteration testing methodology employed. Further, the frequency analyses utilized furthered the development process as bat frequencies are directly related to thickness and stiffness.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5303917 | Uke | Apr 1994 | A |
5364095 | Easton et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5415398 | Eggiman | May 1995 | A |
6042493 | Chauvin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053828 | Pitsenberger | Apr 2000 | A |
6251034 | Eggiman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6398675 | Eggiman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425836 | Misono et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440017 | Anderson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461260 | Higginbotham | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482114 | Eggiman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497631 | Fritzke et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6612945 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6663517 | Buiatti et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6733404 | Fritzke et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
20020094892 | Chauvin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020198071 | Snow | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040209716 | Vacek et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040176197 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |