1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a dunnage bar system that can be used as a swing bar or a dunnage bar. Besides the product, the invention also includes the method by which the product is made.
2. Background Art
The word “dunnage” is an old sailing term for material placed between cargo to prevent shifting and avoid damage to ships and cargo. Today, dunnage, often in the form of jacks, pipes and supports, etc. is used to support loads and prop tools and subassemblies up off the ground.
Dunnage bars may form part of a rack for transporting various parts and subassemblies, such as door panels, hoods, decklids, etc. (collectively “components” herein). Conventionally, such racks include a frame and a number of transverse bars supported on the frame. The racks can be deployed in the parts manufacturer's plant and then shipped to the assembly plant by air, truck or train. These racks can also be used to move components within the plants.
When a laden rack is shipped, it can be subjected to sudden stops and starts that subject the dunnage bar to severe impact. Accordingly, the bar must be strong enough to withstand the weight of the parts and the impact without permanent change to its shape. Ideally, the bar must withstand impact with minimum twisting or bending without affecting its performance and useful life.
Dunnage bars are generally made out of aluminum or steel. The cost of an aluminum bar exceeds that of a steel bar. Due to its recyclable properties, the aluminum bar is subject to theft. Steel bars are generally heavy and are susceptible to corrosion. Further, steel bars are generally not sufficiently flexible. When stressed beyond a yield point, they permanently deform.
Conventional dunnage bars are secured at their ends to a rack by nuts and bolts. One problem (whether made of metals or composites) that has occurred with prior composite bars is that over time cracks can occur that originate from areas of stress concentration, such as bolt holes.
Among the art identified in pre-filing search are the following U.S. Pat. Nos. Des. 324,506; 4,007,837; 4,093,251; 4,238,550; 4,650,381; 4,733,781; 4,826,384; 4,911,312; 4,919,277; 4,921,100; 5,326,204; 5,378,093; 5,418,038; 5,466,103; 5,484,643; 5,511,916; 5,582,495; 5,584,624; 5,603,419; 5,605,239; 5,876,164; 5,876,165; 6,146,068; 6,164,440; 6,394,721 B1; 6,497,542 B1; 6,568,891 B2; 6,572,313 B2; 6,648,142 B1; 6,648,572 B2; 6,679,378 B1; 6,685,405 B2; 6,746,189 B2; 6,786,687; B2.
One object of the present invention is to provide a dunnage bar system which is composed of one part, is rugged and durable in use and requires no additional coatings to resist corrosion.
Accordingly, the dunnage bar of the present invention is a one piece construction bar of a prescribed shape which requires no welding and no special finish for corrosion resistance.
It is another object of the invention to provide an improved dunnage bar of a composite material that replaces steel, while providing weight savings, cost savings, and ergonomic benefits.
Further, an object of the invention is to provide ways to attach the ends of the dunnage bar to the rack or to a swing arm in such a manner as to avoid creating an area of weakness. Conventionally, the dunnage bar sometimes requires counterweights when used as a swing bar to assist the operators in lifting it. Ergonomically superior due to its lower weight, the inventive composite bar eliminates the need for cumbersome, heavy and costly steel counterweights. The disclosed composite bar also eliminates operator injuries due to sharp rusted projections and sudden unplanned movement of the counterweights.
The bar has an internal structure(s) that is formed from blended materials which provide the strength necessary to meet or exceed the chemical and mechanical properties of steel. The composite bar disclosed has a glass matrix and blended resins to achieve strength at a lower cost and a lower weight.
As mentioned above, aluminum bars were often the target of theft. In contrast, the inventive composite dunnage bars tend not to be a pilferage target, given their low scrap value.
Conventionally, a groove in the dunnage bar may accommodate a separate reinforcing member. This is unnecessary in the current one piece rectangular construction because reinforcement is provided by the one piece unit alone.
Prior dunnage bars were subject to permanent impact damage in conventional use. In contrast, the disclosed composite bar is more resilient. It does not permanently deform under load conditions under which steel or aluminum bends and thus become unusable.
Thus, the dunnage bar system of the present invention includes a bar with a generally rectangular cross section. In one embodiment, the bar has four external faces that are joined by arcuate corners. The four faces include an impact-absorbing face that has two arms of a C-section; a basal face opposing the impact-absorbing face; and a pair of side faces that extend between the impact-absorbing and basal faces. Preferably, one or more channels extend at least partially along and within the bar. In one embodiment, each channel has a pair of opposing internal major walls and opposing internal minor walls. Each wall terminates in a corner having an internal radius.
In one aspect of the invention, a spacer member is inserted into each channel in the pair of channels at each end of a bar. The spacer members have apertures that align with bolt holes that are defined within the ends of the dunnage bar. After insertion of the spacer members, a bolt may be inserted through the bolt holes and spacer member. Thus, the ends of the dunnage bar are reinforced and protected against the adverse effects of over-torquing and bolt hole wear.
In another embodiment, a two-hole spacer member is provided for each channel in a dunnage bar that has two holes at each end.
In one variation of a process for making the composite bar system, the steps include:
a) preparing first resin bath and submerging roving;
b) introducing inner channel mats;
c) begin forming inner channel mats around mandrels;
d) continue forming inner channel mats around mandrels;
e) directing roving to center of bar;
f) finally forming inner channel mats around mandrels;
g) forming outer and “C” channel mats before submerging all roving and mats into a second resin bath;
h) continue forming outer and “C” channel mats;
i) shaping the final profile optionally by squeezing the final resin from the outer and “C” channel mats;
j) resumed forming of outer and “C” channel mats;
k) finally forming outer and “C” channel mats and optionally squeezing excess resin from pre-size shape;
l) introducing final form of profile of outer and “C” channel mats at front of die to provide early curing;
m) elevating product temperature and heating die up to curing temperature;
n) hardening the final bar profile; and
o) at least partially curing the bar in the heated die, cooling and severing.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent as the following description continues, especially when considered with the accompanying drawings.
FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b) are process flow diagrams that illustrate the main steps in manufacturing the disclosed product;
The disclosed dunnage bar system 10 (
Each face 40, 42, 44, 46 terminates in an internal corner having a radius. In
As illustrated in
Continuing with primary reference to
In
By experiment, an optimal ratio of r to R lies between 0.4 and 1.0. A determination of this range of optimal results followed impact (drop) test using 72 lb. weights; torsion (twist) testing using a torque between 20 and 80 ft/lb.; deflection measurements where the loads were recorded that produced a 3 inch deflection in a long dunnage bar and testing undertaken both at room temperatures and at temperatures of about −25 degrees Fahrenheit.
One testing procedure involved comparing the damage to a steel bar and a composite bar after impact. In that experiment, both bars were subjected to impacts from a 72 lb. projectile that was dropped from a height of about 1.4 meters. The bar measured 91.25 inches in length. It was observed that the composite bar had no permanent deflection, unlike the steel bar.
In torsion testing, a composite bar was twisted after being subjected to a torque of about 80 ft/lb. At one end of the bar, an 11° twist was observed. When the torque was removed, the bar reverted to its undeflected state. In contrast, when an 80 ft/lb torque was applied to a steel bar, an 88° deflection occurred. When the torque was removed, the bar had a permanent twist of about 12° in an undeflected state. In each case, the bars measured 100.5″ in length.
As noted earlier, the dunnage bar 1 (
As mentioned above, the open C-section 14 (
As depicted in
Optionally, the resin includes a UV additive to provide UV protection. This material does not rust and therefore does not require corrosion-resistant coating.
In one variation, the process (
Numerous process variables can effect the quality of the pultruded composites. Such variables include pull speed, die temperature, quality of fiber/resin wet-out, and fiber volume.
Due to its continuous nature, the pultrusion process can be used to prepare composites of any desired length. As noted earlier, the composites may have profiles with simplex or complex geometry. One feature of conventional pultrusion processes, however, is that the product should preferably have a constant-cross section along its length. Travel through the die results in all surfaces on a protruded composite being smooth and finished. To avoid superficial fragmentation and splintering, a protective coating vail can be applied on top of a transverse continuous glass surface which in one embodiment is wrapped around a random glass layer that in turn covers a longitudinal glass layer. That layer itself in one embodiment, may be applied around a random glass layer that in turn may cover a transverse continuous glass layer.
As illustrated in
In one variation of a process (FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b)) for making the composite bar system, the steps include:
a) preparing first resin bath and submerging roving;
b) introducing inner channel mats;
c) begin forming inner channel mats around mandrels;
d) continue forming inner channel mats around mandrels;
e) directing roving to center of bar;
f) finally forming inner channel mats around mandrels;
g) forming outer and “C” channel mats before submerging all roving and mats into a second resin bath;
h) continue forming outer and “C” channel mats;
i) shaping the final profile optionally by squeezing the final resin from the outer and “C” channel mats;
j) resumed forming of outer and “C” channel mats;
k) finally forming outer and “C” channel mats and optionally squeezing excess resin from pre-size shape;
l) introducing final form of profile of outer and “C” channel mats at front of die to provide early curing;
m) elevating product temperature and heating die, up to curing temperature;
n) hardening the final bar profile; and
o) at least partially curing the bar in the heated die, cooling and severing.
Turning now to
The spacer members 70, 70′ may be provided in a number of alternative embodiments. In one embodiment (
As indicated, in one embodiment, the spacer members may have end plates 70, 70′ that effectively serve as depth gauges so that the positioning of the spacer members within the channel can be predictably and accurately reproduced.
In another embodiment (
In other embodiments, the spacer members 74, 74′ may have side edges that can be positioned adjacent to the internal major faces of the channels. For guidance, if desired, a tongue and groove 84, 86 mechanism can be positioned so as to facilitate the insertion and placement of the spacer member 74, 74′. It can be appreciated that the tongue 84 can be provided in a major internal face of a channel. Correspondingly, the groove can be defined respectively in the spacer member. Indeed, the retainer 84 (
The disclosed dunnage bar system can be designed in order to provide a given deflection by varying certain dimensions (see
In one experiment, an initial reading of deflection was taken on a prototype part with a known wall thickness. The initial deflection reading was taken and other variables were proportioned to optimize deflection, dimensions and weight using the above formula. The moment of inertia can be calculated using the above formula.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of and priority from provisional patent application No. 60/693,682, which was filed on Jun. 24, 2005 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60693682 | Jun 2005 | US |