Composite filter media utilizing bicomponent fibers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10058808
  • Patent Number
    10,058,808
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 14, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 28, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed is composite media that may be utilized in coalescing elements, coalescing cartridges, coalescing systems, and coalescing methods. The disclosed media typically is a composite or laminate material formed by bonding adjacent layers of media material comprising bicomponent fibers.
Description
BACKGROUND

The disclosed subject matter relates to composite filter media. In particular, the disclosed subject matter is related to composite filter media in laminate form prepared by bonding adjacent layers of media material comprising bicomponent fibers. The composite filter media is useful in industrial applications requiring long service life.


There is a demand for increasing the service interval for a filter without increasing the filter size, increasing the filter's pressure drop, or decreasing the filter's capabilities for removing contaminant, in particular, filter performance requirements for high pressure filtration applications, such as hydraulic and fuel filtration, are extremely demanding in terms of particulate removal, yet service intervals preferably are at least 250 hours, but ideally greater than 500 hours, 1,000 hours, or even longer. To meet these pressure drop and life requirements, specially engineered high performance filter media is needed. The demanding removal and service life requirements of some filter applications cannot be met with existing filter media and improved filter media is desirable. In particular, improved composite media and methods for forming composite media are desirable.


SUMMARY

Disclosed is composite media that may be utilized in coalescing elements, coalescing cartridges, and coalescing systems and methods. The composite media typically is formed by bonding at least three layers of media material from an upstream direction to a downstream direction, namely Layer A, optionally Layer B. Layer C, and Layer D. The layers typically have different characteristics and are designed to impart desirable properties to the coalescing media. Typically, one or more of the layers comprise bicomponent fibers. The bicomponent fibers typically comprise different polymeric materials having different physical or chemical characteristics such as melting temperature.


In some embodiments of the disclosed composite media, at least one of Layer A, Layer B, and Layer D comprise bicomponent polymeric fibers having a core and a sheath, and Layer C comprises polymeric nanofiber material. The polymeric material of the sheath of the bicomponent fibers may have a lower melting point than the polymeric material of the core. The polymeric material of the sheath of the bicomponent fibers also may have a lower melting point than the polymeric nanofiber material of Layer C. The composite media material then may be formed by bonding the polymeric nanofiber material of Layer C to the bicomponent fibers of at least one of Layer A, Layer B, and Layer D by a method that includes heating the sheath material of the bicomponent fibers and melting the sheath material of the bicomponent fibers to the polymeric nanofiber material of Layer C.


Exemplary characteristics for the layers utilized to prepare the composite media are disclosed in Table 1. In some embodiments, Layer A comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a nominal mean fiber diameter of greater than about 8, 9, or 10 μm; (b) a mean pore size of greater than about 10, 15, 20, or 25 μm; and (c) a permeability of greater than about 80 cfm. Optionally, Layer A comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a permeability of 80-325 cfm; (b) a basis weight of 20-60 gsm; and (c) a thickness of 0.1-0.5 mm.


Layer B is optional. However, in some embodiments, Layer B is not optional and Layer B comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a nominal mean fiber diameter of 1-5 μm; (b) a mean pore size of 5-15 μm; (c) a basis weight of 15-50 gsm; (d) and a permeability of 25-55 cfm. Optionally, Layer B comprises polymeric media material, having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a maximum pore size of ≤30 μm; and (b) a thickness of 0.1-0.5 mm.


In some embodiments, Layer C comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a nominal mean fiber diameter of 0.1-5, 0.1-3, or 0.1-1 μm; (b) a mean pore size of 0.1-15 or 0.2-10 μm; and (c) a permeability of 3-55 cfm. Layer C may include nanofibers having a nominal mean fiber diameter of less than 1 μm and may be otherwise referred to as a nanofiber layer. Optionally, Layer C comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a maximum pore size of ≤10 μm; (b) a basis weight of 8-50 gsm; (c) and a thickness of 0.1-0.5 mm.


In some embodiments, Layer D comprises polymeric material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a nominal mean fiber diameter of greater than about 8. 9, or 10 μm; (b) a mean pore size of greater than about 10, 15, 20, or 25 μm; and (c) a permeability of greater than about 40 cfm. Optionally, Layer D comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a permeability of 40-200 cfm; (b) a basis weight of 40-200 gsm; and (c) a thickness of 0.1-0.56 mm.


In some embodiments, the composite media has a permeability of less than about 40, 30, 20, 10, or 5 cfm. Preferably, the composite media formed from the multiple layers has a permeability of about 3-40 cfm.


The disclosed composite media may be further formed as pleated filter media. In some embodiments, the pleated filter media may be over-packed, for example, where the coalescing media has a pleat density D that exceeds 1/(2H) where H is the thickness of the coalescing media. Where the composite media is pleated, it may be further configured to resist collapsing of its pleats. In some embodiments, Layer D comprises media material that is textured and comprises grooves in a direction approximately perpendicular to the pleated media bend lines in order to resist collapsing of the composite media's pleats.


The disclosed composite media may be utilized in coalescing elements, for example, coalescing elements configured for coalescing a discontinuous liquid phase from a continuous liquid phase. In some embodiments, the coalescing elements are configured for method of coalescing water immersed in a liquid hydrocarbon (e.g., hydrocarbon fuel, biodiesel fuel, or lubricating, hydraulic, or transmission oil). The coalescing elements may be utilized in filter cartridges. Suitable coalescing elements and filter cartridges that may comprise the disclosed pleated coalescing media are disclosed in U.S. Published Application No. 2011/0168621, published on Jul. 14, 2011, and U.S. Published Application No. 2011/0168647, published on Jul. 14, 2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 provides a schematic of one embodiment of high performance composite media as contemplated herein.



FIG. 2 provides exemplary configurations for the bicomponent fibers utilized in the presently disclosed composite media.



FIG. 3 illustratively provides definitions for terms used herein for describing a pleated form of the presently disclosed composite media.



FIG. 4 provides a schematic illustration of a cross-section of one embodiment of pleated coalescing media as contemplated herein. (A) Normal pleat density, D<1/(2H); and (B) overpacked condition, D>1/(2H).



FIG. 5 provides a scanning electronic micrograph of a cross-section of one embodiment of high performance composite filter media as contemplated herein, showing the layers and a textured groove on the downstream face of Layer D.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein is composite media formed from multiple layers of media material. The media may be further described based on the following definitions.


Unless otherwise specified or indicated by context, the terms “a”, “an”, and “the” mean “one or more” or “at least one.” For example, “a layer” should be interpreted to mean “one or more layers.”


As used herein, “about”, “approximately,” “substantially,” and “significanitly” will be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art and will vary to some extent on the context in which they are used. If there are uses of the term which are not clear to persons of ordinary skill in the art given the context in which it is used, “about” and “approximately” will mean plus or minus ≤10% of the particular term and “substantially” and “significantly” will mean plus or minus >10% of the particular term.


As used herein, the terms “include” and “including” have the same meaning as the terms “comprise” and “comprising.”


The presently disclosed composite media typically is prepared from multiple layers of bonded fibrous filter media. The fibrous filter media typically comprises polymeric fibers (i.e., synthetic fibers). FIG. 1 shows one simplified schematic of the layers utilized to prepare a composite media as contemplated herein. The composite media may be prepared from at least 4 layers of media material as shown in FIG. 1 (Layers A, B, C, and D), but may include only 3 layers of media material as described below (Layers A, C, and D). Exemplary properties of each layer of media material are shown in Table 1. The layers that form the composite media may be bonded by processes that include thermal bonding (e.g., via ultrasonic bonding, hot calendering, belt calendering, through-air thermal bonding, and radiant-heat bonding), and/or chemical bonding (e.g., via the use of binders such as butadiene copolymers, acrylates, and vinyl copolymers).


In some embodiments, the disclosed media is a laminate filter media prepared by bonding a minimum of three (3) layers of media designed to provide longer service life than conventional composite or laminate filter media of equivalent contaminant removal characteristics without an increase in the size of the resultant filter element. The laminate filter media may include: (1) a coarse, open upstream layer with larger polymeric fiber designed to enable use of a pleated form of the composite media having over-packed pleat densities without significant degradation in removal nor service live; (2) optional one or more tighter polymeric layer(s) with finer fibers designed to serve as transition layer(s) in gradient filtration and to protect the filtration layer from damage by laminating; (3) a polymeric micro- or nano-fiber layer to provide high removal for fine particles at low pressure drop; and (4) a thin, coarse, open downstream layer with larger polymeric fibers designed to facilitate relatively unrestricted flow through the media under over-packed pleat densities without significant degradation in contaminant removal nor service life and to provide structural support for upstream layers.


In the presently disclosed filter media, Layers A, B and D may provide support and permit bonding of all the layers of the media into a composite such that further support (such as a screen, cellulose or other stiffer material) is not required. Layer C is sandwiched between Layers B and D, or between Layers A and D, if there is no layer B. The inclusion of optional Layer B as a transition layer with finer fibers than Layer A and coarser fibers than Layer C yields media with no significant loss in contaminate removal or change in maximum pore size. Preferably, the fiber diameter of Layer B may be intermediate between the fiber diameters of Layers A and C. Ideally, the fiber diameter of Layer B may be between 1.5 and 4 times the fiber diameter of Layer C and less than the fiber diameter of Layer A. If additional layers are incorporated between A and C, then a more gradual transition in fiber diameter from A to C is envisioned with each successive layer having a smaller fiber diameter than its preceding layer.


One or more of the layers of media material utilized to prepare the composite media typically comprises bicomponent fibers. As used herein, “bicomponent fibers” means fibers that are formed by extruding two different polymers from the same spinneret with both polymers being contained with the same filament. The term “conjugate fibers” may be used interchangeably with “bicomponent fibers.” The bicomponent fibers utilized to prepare the presently disclosed composite media may have any suitable configurations, including but not limited to, a core and sheath configuration and a side-by-side configuration. (See FIG. 2.)


Polymer materials that may be suitable for producing bicomponent fibers for use in the presently disclosed composite media may include, but are not limited to, polyesters (e.g. poly(ethylene terephthalate) (“PET”), poly(butylene terephthalate (“PBT”), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (“PTT”), poly(ethylene naphthalate) (“PEN”), poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate) (“PCT”), polylactic acid), polyamides (e.g., poly(hexamethylene adipamide) (“nylon 6,6”) and polycaprolactam (“nylon 6,6”), co-polyamides, polyethylenes (e.g., high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), polypropylenes, polystyrenes, polyurethanes, and polyoxymethylenes (i.e., acetal).


The bicomponent fibers may comprise two different polymeric materials having different melting temperatures. Wither regard to melting temperature (T), polymers typically have an “onset melting point” or “Tomp” and a “peak melting point” or “Tpmp,” as determined by differential scanning calorimetry. Polymers have complex melting temperatures, unlike water-ice, and a Tomp and a Tpmp for a given polymer may be broadly defined by a temperature range. In some embodiments, the different polymeric materials may have onset melting temperatures that differ by at least about 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50° C. In other embodiments, the different polymeric materials may have onset melting temperatures that differ by no more than about 60, 50, 40, 30, or 20° C. In further embodiments, the different polymeric materials may have onset melting temperatures that differ within a range of temperatures (e.g., 10-60, 10-50, 10-40, 10-30, 10-20, 20-60, 20-50, 20-40, 20-30, 30-60, 30-50, 30-40, 40-60, 40-50, or 50-60° C. The melting temperatures of some polymeric materials that are suitable for preparing the bicomponent fibers contemplated herein are shown in Table 2. In some embodiments, where the different polymers have temperatures ranges for their Tomp, the difference in Tomp for the two polymers may be calculated by taking the highest temperature value for the Tomp of one polymer and subtracting this temperature value from the lowest value for the Tomp of the other polymer. For example, the bicomponent fibers might be formed from PBT having a Tomp of 220-230° C. and from Nylon 6.6 having a Tomp of 245-255° C. In this case, the highest value for the Tomp of PCT is 230° C. and the lowest value for the Tomp of Nylon 6,6 is 245° C., so the temperature difference may be calculated as 245-230=15° C. This same calculation may be performed to determine the temperature difference between two Tpmp's for two different polymers, where the two different polymers have temperatures ranges for their Tpmp's.


In the disclosed composite media, Layers A, B, C, and/or D may comprise or consist of bicomponent polymer fibers, ideally produced by meltspinning to yield the appropriate fiber diameter as contemplated herein. The bicomponent polymeric fibers of Layers A, B, C, and/or D, facilitate bonding of the layers in order to form the composite media material. Bicomponent polymeric fibers have been described (see, e.g., WO2005059219A1), and typically comprise or consist of fibers, with a two or more components in cross-section, such as a core and sheath (or skin) in cross-section. In such a configuration, the core is composed of a different polymer than the polymer of the sheath. As utilized in Layers A. B, and/or D of the filter media contemplated herein, the outermost sheath polymer may have a lower melting point than the innermost core polymer and a lower melting point than the Layer C polymer. This configuration facilitates bonding (e.g., via ultrasonic bonding) of Layer A, B, and/or D to Layer C while maintaining the integrity of Layer C, and also enables the use of less energy in the bonding process, which in turn, may reduce damage to Layer C. This configuration also enables higher melting point polymers to be used for the core, imparting characteristics to Layers A, B, C and/or D, as a whole, different than would be otherwise achievable. Such characteristics may include, but not be limited to fiber diameter, stiffness, melting point, elasto-tensile strength, and the like.


Composite media formed by bonding Layer A, optional Layer B. Layer C, and Layer D functions to resist premature plugging. Layer B is optional, however it is contemplated that there could be one or more layers between Layers A and C conforming to the characteristics and design practices that are described herein.


The first upstream layer, Layer A, is more open and exhibits lower particle removal, than Layer B and succeeding layers upstream of Layer C. Each of these successive layers after Layer A exhibits higher particle removal than its preceding layer. This is done by decreasing the fiber diameter, porosity and/or pore size of each successive layer. Collectively, these layers are designed to provide progressively higher removal for particles of a given size and to remove progressively smaller particles than the preceding layers. In addition to increasing service life, Layers A and B secondarily protect the structure of the primary filtration Layer C during manufacturing and processing of the media. In some embodiments, Layer A may be meltspun or meltblown material. In some embodiments, Layer B and succeeding layers upstream of Layer C are preferably produced by meltblowing or meltspinning to produce fibers with appropriate fiber diameter, pore size, particle removal, and processing characteristics.


Layer C is primarily the filtration layer of the media and its properties may be configured for specific applications. Layer C comprises polymeric micro- or nano-fibers or a mixture of polymeric micro- and nano-fibers. Layer C typically has physical and particle removal properties appropriate for the particular application.


Layer D provides support and protection during processing for the upstream layers. In such conventional media, Layer D typically comprises or consists of relatively “open” media having sufficient strength to support the upstream layers of media under conditions of use. Layer D also facilitates processing of the upstream layers of media. In preparing the composite media, the integrity of the individual media layers should be retained during compositing (i.e., after combining of the various media layers into the final laminate, each layer of the laminate retains its individual characteristics).


The presently disclosed media may be configured as pleated coalescing media. (See FIGS. 3 and 4). The number of pleats per unit length in a direction normal to the flow and perpendicular to the pleats (i.e., perpendicular to the depth of the pleats and pleated media bend lines), is referred to as pleat density, D. Overpacking occurs when the pleat density is so high that the media from opposing faces of a pleat touch. FIG. 4 schematically illustrates pleated media in a normal and overpacked condition. The theoretical maximum pleat density for conventional filter media is limited by the thickness of the filter media, H, and is equal to 1/(2H). Overpacking refers to the condition in which the pleat density of a filter exceeds this theoretical maximum pleat density.


The presently disclosed composite media may be configured for use in a variety of coalescing or filtration applications such as pleated configurations for use in fuel/water separator and hydraulic filter applications. The presently disclosed composite media typically retains its contaminant removal characteristics, yet resists premature plugging, even in an pleated, over-packed state.


The present inventors have discovered that the relative concentration of fine particles smaller than about 5 μm is elevated in fuel and hydraulic filter applications. In some embodiments of the presently disclosed composite media for use in fuel and hydraulic filter applications, the composite media may be configured as pleated media for removing particles smaller than about 5 μm. Preferably, the media resists premature plugging by elevated concentrations of particles smaller than 5 μm and semisolids. Where pleated forms of the presently disclosed composite media are used in such applications, Layer C may be as thin as practical while retaining the desired particle removal characteristics. This enables the use of pleated forms of the media in an over-packed condition with high pleat densities to achieve the desired service life.


The presently disclosed media may be configured for use in filter element as pleated media in an over-packed condition (i.e., where D>1/(2H). Composite media suitable for use in over-packed filter elements may be obtained via a selected configuration of Layer D. In conventional laminate filter media, Layer D provides support and protection during processing for the upstream layers, in such conventional media, Layer D typically comprises or consists of relatively “open” media having sufficient strength to support the upstream layers of media under conditions of use. Layer D also facilitates processing of the upstream layers of media. As disclosed herein, Layer D, as shown in Table 1, provides the additional function of enabling the media to be used in an over-packed condition with minimal or no loss of effective filter media surface area, unlike conventional laminate media. As disclosed herein, Layer D is intended to compress at high pleat densities in a manner that minimizes the adverse effects on pressure drop and contaminate removal. As such, Layer D may serve as a “crumple zone,” such that the fluid flows parallel to the surface of pleat, instead of normal to the surface as in conventional media, with minimal increase in restriction in an over-packed condition.


In pleated configurations of the disclosed composite media, undesirable compression of Layer D at high pleat densities may be minimized via using a relatively large fiber diameter for the media of Layer D, texturing of the surface of Layer D, and minimizing the thickness of Layer D. For example, Layer D may comprise polymeric fibers with geometric mean diameter greater than 10 μm, and ideally greater than 40 μm, typically produced by meltspinning or meltblowing. Additionally, Layer D may have an uncompressed thickness of less than 0.56 mm, and generally greater than 0.1 mm. Media with Layer D meeting these requirements, even in compressed form, remains sufficiently open to permit fluid flow, thus exhibiting longer service life and more efficient utilization of the filter media surface area compared to media without such a layer. In an over-packed condition, existing filter media used to filter fluids enriched in particles smaller than about 5 μm exhibit heavy loading with contaminates near the pleat peaks but little to no visible loading near the peak valleys. In contrast, over-packed media with Layer D as described herein exhibits nearly uniform contaminant loading across the entire depth of the pleat.


Resistance to collapse for pleated forms of the composite media may be further increased by texturing the downstream surface of Layer D. This can be done by embossing or thermally processing the media to yield a three dimensional textured or grooved structure aligned in the machine direction of the media on the downstream side of Layer D. In a filter element utilizing such grooved media, the grooves of the media may be aligned in the machine direction of the media (i.e., in a direction approximately parallel to the depth of the pleats, or perpendicular to the pleated media bend lines), or the grooves may extend radially for cylindrical filter elements. Grooves or texture as shallow as about 0.1 mm may be utilized.


In some embodiments of the disclosed composite media for fuel, hydraulic, and other demanding industrial applications, maximum thickness of Layer D is less than about 0.56 mm and a Layer D has a grooved surface. FIG. 5 shows a micrograph of a cross-section of Layer D as described in Table 1 having a grooved surface. Depending on the specific characteristics of the composite media described in this application, increases in pleat density from 11.1 to 32.0% may be achieved along with corresponding increases in capacity and service life. These increases in capacity and service life may be achieved by using the media in an over-packed condition.


In specific embodiments, the composite media may be prepared from Layer D comprising or consisting of polymeric filter media with the following properties: (1) a fiber diameter greater than 10 μm, mean pore size greater than 20 μm, permeability greater than 40 cfm, and thickness less than 0.56 mm to enable significantly higher pleat density and correspondingly higher contaminant holding capacity and service life; (2) a capability of being over-packed, i.e., where the pleat density is in excess of the 1/(2H), without significant performance penalty; and (3) optionally, comprising or consisting of bicomponent fibers.


In some embodiments of the composite media, Layer A need not be as thick as Layer D. However, Layer A must still have high enough porosity and large enough fiber diameter, to allow flow to pass through the layer in a direction essentially parallel to the surface of Layer C with minimal restriction. If Layer A does not have high enough porosity and large enough fiber diameter, restriction may be excessive and over 50 percent of the media may not be fully utilized, as shown in FIG. 4. The physical characteristics described herein enable the use of over-packed media to increase the optimal pleat density. Thus, increased useful filter media surface area and service life can be achieved for demanding applications, like lube, hydraulic and fuel filtration where the contaminant size distribution is dominated by particles finer than about 5 μm.


In particular, the disclosed laminate media may include a Layer A comprising or consisting of polymeric filter media with the following properties: (1) a fiber diameter greater than 8 μm, mean pore size greater than 25 μm, permeability greater than 80 cfm, and thickness less than 0.50 mm to enable significantly higher pleat density and correspondingly higher contaminant holding capacity and service life; (2) a capability of being over-packed, i.e., where the pleat density is in excess of the 1/(2H), without significant performance penalty; and (3) optionally, comprising or consisting of bicomponent fibers. In particular, the disclosed laminate media may include a Layer A and/or a Layer D, as just described.


Exemplary configurations of layers for preparing the composite media disclosed herein are disclosed in U.S. Published Application No. 2011/0168621, published on Jul. 14, 2011, and U.S. Published Application No. 2011/0168647, published on Jul. 14, 2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. These applications disclose a multilayer media having one or more of the following characteristics: Layer A: nominal mean fiber diameter >10 μm; mean pore size >50 μm; maximum pore size >100 μm; permeability 225-325 cfm; thickness 0.3-0.5 mm; and basis weight 48±10 gsm. Layer B: nominal mean fiber diameter 1.0-5.0 μm; mean pore size 5.0-15.0 μm; maximum pore size 10.0-25.0 μm; permeability 35-55 cfm; thickness 0.1-0.3 mm; and basis weight 38±10 gsm. Layer C: nominal mean fiber diameter 0.1-0.8 μm; mean pore size 1.0-8.0 μm; maximum pore size 1.0-10.0 μm; permeability 3.0-20.0 cfm; thickness 0.1-0.3 mm; and basis weight >20 gsm. Layer D: nominal mean fiber diameter >40 μm; mean pore size 30-35 μm; maximum pore size 40-65 μm; permeability 50-75 cfm; thickness 0.45-0.65; and basis weight 198±20 gsm.


Composite filter media as disclosed herein was tested using PTI 0-5 μm test dust, which is a surrogate for the contaminants found in actual fuel applications, and using ISO Fine Test Dust, which is a coarser contaminant specified in SAE fuel filter test standards. With ISO Fine, the capacity of over-packed elements was reduced by large particles loading the upstream portion of pleats and the full media surface area was not fully utilized. With PTI 0-5 μm dust, full utilization of the surface area and higher capacity was obtained when the fiber diameter of the media in Layer A was greater than about 8 μm, but not when finer fibers were used for Layer A.


In the foregoing description, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that varying substitutions and modifications may be made to the invention disclosed herein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The invention illustratively described herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations which is not specifically disclosed herein. The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention that in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been illustrated by specific embodiments and optional features, modification and/or variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention.


Citations to a number of references are made herein. The cited references are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. In the event that there is an inconsistency between a definition of a term in the specification as compared to a definition of the term in a cited reference, the term should be interpreted based on the definition in the specification.











TABLE 1









Exemplary Media Layers and Properties of Laminate Media
















Nominal









Mean
Mean




Fiber
Pore
Maximum


Basis




Diameter
Size
Pore Size
Permeability
Thickness
Weight


Layer
Material
(μm)
(μm)
(μm)
(cfm)
(mm)
(gsm)





A
Polybutylene
 >8
>25
>30
80-325
0.1-0.5
20-60



terephthalate


B
Polybutylene
  1-5
5-15
10-25
25-55 
0.1-0.5
15-50



terephthalate


C
Polyamide
0.1-5
1-15
 1-25
3-55
0.1-0.5
 8-50


D
Polyethylene
>10
>20
>40
40-200
0.10-0.56
 40-180



terephthalate


















TABLE 2







Peak



Onset Melting Point
Melting point


Material
(Tomp), ° C.
(Tpmp), ° C.







PBT
220-230
223-230


PET (film grade)
240-250
250-260


PET (Meltblown grade)
200-220
210-230


PTT
215-235
225-235


PEN
255-265
265-275


PCT
275
285


PLA
140-150
150-160


co-polyamides (PA 4,14)
200-210
210-220


PA46
280
285


polycaprolactam
220-235
225-235


(Nylon 6)


poly(hexamethylene adipamide
245-255
255-265


(Nylon 6,6)


PA610
200-210
210-220


PA612
210-220
220-230


PA11
145
155


PA12
120-130
130-140


PPS (Polyphenylene sulfide)
275-280
285-290


PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene)
315-320
325-330


PVDF Polyvinylidene Fluoride)
160-165
170-175








Claims
  • 1. A composite media comprising: at least three layers of media material, the at least three layers of media material bonded together and include, from an upstream direction to a downstream direction, a Layer A, a Layer C, and a Layer D,wherein one or more layers adjacent to the Layer C consists of bicomponent polymeric fibers,wherein the Layer A comprises polymeric media material having a nominal mean fiber diameter of greater than about 10 μm; the Layer C comprises polymeric media material comprising nanofibers and having a mean pore size of 0.2-10 μm; and the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a nominal mean fiber diameter greater than about 10 μm and provides support for the preceding layers,wherein the composite media is configured as a pleated filter media,wherein the pleated filter media has a pleat density that exceeds 1/(2H), wherein H is a thickness of the composite media, andwherein the polymeric media material of Layer D is textured and comprises grooves in a direction perpendicular to bend lines in pleats of the Layer D.
  • 2. The composite media claim 1, wherein the bicomponent polymeric fibers comprise two different polymeric materials, wherein one of the two different polymeric materials has a different onset melting point than an onset melting point of another of the two different polymeric materials.
  • 3. The composite media of claim 2, wherein the onset melting points of the one of the two polymeric materials and the other of the two different polymeric materials differ by at least 10° C.
  • 4. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the bicomponent polymeric fibers comprise a core and sheath in cross-section, the core and sheath each comprise a polymeric material, wherein the polymeric material of the core is a different polymeric material than the polymeric material of the sheath, and wherein the polymeric material of the sheath has a melting temperature that is lower than a melting temperature of the polymeric material of the core.
  • 5. The composite media of claim 4, wherein the Layer A consists of the bicomponent polymeric fibers, and the melting temperature of the polymeric material of the sheath is lower than a melting temperature of the polymeric media material of the Layer C.
  • 6. The composite media of claim 4, further comprising a Layer B disposed between the Layer A and the Layer C, wherein the Layer B consists of the bicomponent polymeric fibers, and the melting temperature of the polymeric material of the sheath is lower than a melting temperature of the polymeric media material of the Layer C.
  • 7. The composite media of claim 4, wherein the Layer D consists of the bicomponent polymeric fibers, and the melting temperature of the polymeric material of the sheath is lower than a melting temperature of the polymeric material of the Layer C.
  • 8. The composite media of claim 4, wherein the Layer A and the Layer D consist of the bicomponent polymeric fibers, and the melting temperature of the polymeric material of the sheath is lower than a melting temperature of the polymeric material of the Layer C.
  • 9. The composite media of claim 4, further comprising a Layer B disposed between the Layer A and the Layer C, wherein the Layer A, the Layer B, and the Layer D consist of the bicomponent polymeric fibers, and the melting temperature of the polymeric material of the sheath is lower than a melting temperature of the polymeric material of Layer C.
  • 10. The composite media of claim 1, wherein one or more layers are bonded to one or more adjacent layers via ultrasonic bonding.
  • 11. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer A comprises polymeric media material having a mean pore size of greater than about 25μm.
  • 12. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer A comprises polymeric media material having a maximum pore size of greater than about 30 μm.
  • 13. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer A comprises polymeric media material having a permeability of 80-325 cfm.
  • 14. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer A comprises polymeric media material having a thickness of 0.1-0.5 mm.
  • 15. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer A comprises polymeric media material having a basis weight of 20-60 gsm.
  • 16. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer C comprises polymeric media material having a nominal mean fiber diameter of 0.1-5 μm.
  • 17. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer C comprises polymeric media material having a maximum pore size of 1-25 μm.
  • 18. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer C comprises polymeric media material having a permeability of about 3-55 cfm.
  • 19. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer C comprises polymeric media material having a thickness of 0.1-0.5 mm.
  • 20. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer C comprises polymeric media material having a basis weight of 8-50 gsm.
  • 21. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a nominal mean fiber diameter greater than 15 μm.
  • 22. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a mean pore size greater than 20 μm.
  • 23. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a maximum pore size greater than 40 μm.
  • 24. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a permeability of 40-200 cfm.
  • 25. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a thickness of 0.1-0.56 mm.
  • 26. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polymeric media material having a basis weight of 40-180 gsm.
  • 27. The composite media of claim 1, further comprising a Layer B disposed between the Layer A and the Layer C, wherein the Layer B comprises polymeric media material having one or more of the following characteristics: (a) a nominal mean fiber diameter of 1-5 μm; (b) a mean pore size of 5-15 μm; (c) a maximum pore size of 10-25 μm; (d) a permeability of 25-55 cfm; (e) a thickness of 0.1-0.5 mm; and (f) a basis weight of 15-50 gsm.
  • 28. The composite media of claim 1, further comprising a Layer B disposed between the Layer A and the Layer C, wherein at least one of the Layer A, the Layer B, the Layer C, and the Layer D comprises polymeric material selected from a group consisting of polyamide material, polybutylene terephthalate material, polyethylene terephthalate material, and polyester material.
  • 29. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the one or more layers adjacent to the Layer C consists of bicomponent polymeric fibers that have been meltspun or meltblown.
  • 30. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer C comprises polyamide material.
  • 31. The composite media of claim 1, further comprising a Layer B disposed between the Layer A and the Layer C, wherein at least one of the Layer A and the Layer B comprise polybutylene terephthalate material.
  • 32. The composite media of claim 1, wherein the Layer D comprises polyethylene terephthalate material.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/716,904, filed on Oct. 22, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (175)
Number Name Date Kind
3890123 Kuga Jun 1975 A
4210697 Adiletta Jul 1980 A
4229297 Nohmi et al. Oct 1980 A
4309475 Hoffman, Jr. Jan 1982 A
4460648 Kondo et al. Jul 1984 A
4547420 Krueger et al. Oct 1985 A
4552603 Harris, Jr. et al. Nov 1985 A
4615804 Wright Oct 1986 A
4663221 Makimura et al. May 1987 A
4707399 Rambosek Nov 1987 A
4729371 Krueger et al. Mar 1988 A
4732809 Harris, Jr. et al. Mar 1988 A
4795668 Krueger et al. Jan 1989 A
4824623 Rambosek Apr 1989 A
5019211 Sauer May 1991 A
5116524 Carduck et al. May 1992 A
5130195 Sampanis et al. Jul 1992 A
5167765 Nielsen et al. Dec 1992 A
5232647 Sampanis et al. Aug 1993 A
5284704 Kochesky et al. Feb 1994 A
5372885 Tabor et al. Dec 1994 A
5443724 Williamson et al. Aug 1995 A
5509430 Berger Apr 1996 A
5540992 Marcher et al. Jul 1996 A
5580459 Powers et al. Dec 1996 A
5607766 Berger Mar 1997 A
5620641 Berger Apr 1997 A
5633082 Berger May 1997 A
5669796 Harford Sep 1997 A
5702658 Pellegrin et al. Dec 1997 A
5723215 Hernandez et al. Mar 1998 A
5786059 Frank et al. Jul 1998 A
5885390 Alkire et al. Mar 1999 A
5885705 Kent et al. Mar 1999 A
5888651 Hoyt et al. Mar 1999 A
5888915 Denton et al. Mar 1999 A
5948528 Helms, Jr. et al. Sep 1999 A
5948529 Hastie Sep 1999 A
6004674 Kent et al. Dec 1999 A
6026819 Berger Feb 2000 A
6039903 Kent et al. Mar 2000 A
6074590 Gownder Jun 2000 A
6153138 Helms, Jr. et al. Nov 2000 A
6174601 Stanitis et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174603 Berger Jan 2001 B1
6207276 Spindler et al. Mar 2001 B1
6251224 Dong Jun 2001 B1
6312545 Nickel et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316103 Stanitis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6332994 Karageorgiou Dec 2001 B1
6395392 Gownder May 2002 B1
6461133 Lake et al. Oct 2002 B1
6474967 Haynes et al. Nov 2002 B1
6632313 Nickel et al. Oct 2003 B2
6641916 Chang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6648926 Immediato Nov 2003 B1
6656586 Hartzog et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673158 Ouellette et al. Jan 2004 B1
6692687 Chang et al. Feb 2004 B2
6773810 Sen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783854 Bond Aug 2004 B2
6811871 Sen et al. Nov 2004 B2
6846561 Gownder et al. Jan 2005 B1
6841245 Chang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860917 Henrichsen et al. Mar 2005 B2
6877197 Van Trump et al. Apr 2005 B1
6887343 Schukar et al. May 2005 B2
6946012 Miller et al. Sep 2005 B1
6953622 Tsai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6974628 Van Trump et al. Dec 2005 B2
7011885 Chang et al. Mar 2006 B2
7033530 Chang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7081423 Abed et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087301 Musgrave et al. Aug 2006 B2
7135228 Sen et al. Nov 2006 B2
7147815 Chang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7160091 Baumeister Jan 2007 B2
7195819 Hietpas et al. Mar 2007 B2
7235124 Liu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7250126 Haberkamp et al. Jul 2007 B2
7290668 Ward et al. Nov 2007 B2
7310933 Hietpas et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314558 Jaroszczyk et al. Jan 2008 B1
7354478 Yang et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357985 Kurian et al. Apr 2008 B2
7604859 Liu et al. Oct 2009 B2
7615173 Van Trump Nov 2009 B2
7648546 Haberkamp et al. Jan 2010 B2
7655070 Dallas Feb 2010 B1
7662323 Flood et al. Feb 2010 B1
7674425 Schwandt et al. Mar 2010 B2
7727627 Sen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7754123 Verdegan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7838449 Black et al. Nov 2010 B2
7910208 Flood et al. Mar 2011 B2
7981226 Pourdeyhimi et al. Jul 2011 B2
8002990 Schroeder et al. Aug 2011 B2
8003209 Flood et al. Aug 2011 B2
8007699 Bieser et al. Aug 2011 B2
8142584 Yang et al. Mar 2012 B2
8231752 Janikowski et al. Jul 2012 B2
8360251 Wieczorek et al. Jan 2013 B2
8389426 Dahringer et al. Mar 2013 B2
8420556 Pourdeyhimi et al. Apr 2013 B2
8517185 Wieczorek et al. Aug 2013 B2
8590712 Wieczorek et al. Nov 2013 B2
8678202 Wieczorek et al. Mar 2014 B2
9199185 Verdegan et al. Dec 2015 B2
20020025433 Chang et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020100541 Nickel et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020177379 Abed et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030039833 Sen et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055162 Sen et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030082377 Hartzog et al. May 2003 A1
20030091821 Bond May 2003 A1
20040084796 Chang et al. May 2004 A1
20040094459 Prater et al. May 2004 A1
20040126578 Tsai et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040137211 Ouellette et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040170831 Sen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191513 Chang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040222544 Chang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040247868 Van Trump Dec 2004 A1
20050031863 Gownder et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050061456 Sen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050093196 Chang et al. May 2005 A1
20050095427 Chang et al. May 2005 A1
20050123752 Van Tramp et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050175835 Musgrave et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186877 Yang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050189292 Ward et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196612 Flood et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050233018 Baumeister Oct 2005 A1
20060024496 Hietpas et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060070294 Spittle Apr 2006 A1
20060110598 Musgrave et al. May 2006 A9
20060207234 Ward et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060292355 Pourdeyhimi et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070004830 Flood et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020453 Sen et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031668 Hietpas et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070035057 Chang et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070039300 Kahlbaugh et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070062887 Schwandt et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065664 Kurian et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071974 Hietpas et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070173161 Allgeuer et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080053888 Ellis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080057309 Liu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080139068 Yang et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143009 Kurian et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160278 Cheng et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187751 Ward et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080202078 Healey Aug 2008 A1
20080311814 O'Sickey et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090025151 Marazzi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090050578 Israel et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090188870 Schroeder et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090227166 Goda Sep 2009 A1
20090258191 Peacock Oct 2009 A1
20090297809 Black et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100038815 Flood et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100047571 Bieser et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100206803 Ward Aug 2010 A1
20110028062 Chester et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110165470 Dahringer et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110168621 Wieczorek et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110168647 Wieczorek Jul 2011 A1
20110210081 Green et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244750 Bieser et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110250812 Pourdeyhimi et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120175298 Gupta et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120223008 Mbadinga-Mouanda Sep 2012 A1
20130023177 Claasen et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130134088 Dahringer et al. May 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
1890419 Jan 2007 CN
101098741 Jan 2008 CN
101282773 Oct 2008 CN
101687128 Mar 2010 CN
10 2008 026 485 Feb 2009 DE
1813498 May 1993 RU
2371235 Oct 2009 RU
1761201 Sep 1992 SU
2005059219 Jun 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Bicomponent Fiber, Feb. 19, 2003, one page, accessed online Jul. 29, 2015.
Davis, 1958, Factors Influencing the Air Permeability of Felt and Felt-Like Structures.
Hegde et al., Apr. 2004, Bicomponent Fibers.
International Search Report and Written Opinion based on PCT/US13/49896, dated Nov. 22, 2013, 11 pages.
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent No. 201180031592.8, dated Dec. 25, 2014.
Decision of Grant Patent for Invention issued in Russian Application No. 2013102593/05, dated Feb. 18, 2015.
Chinese Office Action issued for Chinese Patent Application No. 201380052593 point X, dated Dec. 23, 2015, 7 pages.
German Office Action and translation for German Patent Application No. 11 209 002 121.2, dated Jan. 28, 2016, 10 pages.
Office Action Issued for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510530266.1, and English language translation, dated Dec. 28, 2016, 15 pages.
First Office Action issued for Indian Patent Application No. 1513/KOLNP/2011, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 7 pages.
First Examination Report Issued for Indian Patent Application No. 4066/KOLNP/2011, dated Aug. 23, 2017, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140110354 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61716904 Oct 2012 US