Patent Grant
8308834
The field of the invention relates generally to a composite nonwoven filter media, and more particularly, to a spunbond nonwoven filter media having a nanofiber based layer applied to at least one surface.
Some known filter media composite constructs incorporate a wet-laid paper making process to produce the substrate, and an electro-spun technology to deposit a lightweight nanofiber coating on one or both sides of the filter media substrate. Typically the media substrate has a basis weight of 100-120 grams per square meter (g/m2), and the nanofiber layer has a basis weight of 0.1 g/m2 or less.
It is known that the lightweight nanofiber layer is vulnerable to damage in high mechanical stress applications, especially because the nanofiber layer is formed from fibers with diameters less than 500 nanometer (nm), and more typically, 100 nm. It is known that there are “shedding” problems where the nanofibers are shed from the filter media because of relatively weak attraction bonds between the nanofibers and the base media for conventional electro-spun fibers that rely on polarity attraction forces. Also, known electro-spun nanofiber layers are two dimensional in structure or a single fiber layer in thickness, and when the nanofiber layer cracks or breaks, dust can readily penetrate the base media substrate After the nanofiber layer is damaged, dust is permitted to penetrate the base media and contribute to a rise in the operating pressure drop of the filter. Further, known media substrates also have mechanical stress limitations and are prone to deformation under high dust loading.
These known filter media composite constructs when used to filter inlet air of power generation gas turbines can permit fine dust particulates to penetrate the filter over the operating life of the filter. Typically, this known filter media type will have a new or clean operating electrically neutral efficiency providing for around 55% of capture of 0.4 μm particles, at a pressure drop typically greater than 7.0 mm H2O, and a Quality Factor less than 300, when tested in accordance with the ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test procedure at the known operating flow rate. It is known that as much as 15 to 20 pounds of dust can penetrate known filter media over a 24,000 hour operating life because of this low initial efficiency. Exposing the turbine blades to dust over an extended time can cause serious and catastrophic fouling and erosion of the turbine blades. The current procedure of cleaning the turbine blades requires taking the turbine off-line at periodic intervals to water wash the blades clean. Turbine down time is expensive because the turbine is not operating and therefore, power generation is curtailed. It would be desirable to provide a higher efficiency filter media than the known filter media at a similar or reduced pressure drop to reduce or eliminate turbine down time to clean the turbine blades and/or the replacement of damaged blades.
In one aspect, a composite filter media structure is provided. The composite filter media structure includes a base substrate that includes a nonwoven synthetic fabric formed from a plurality of fibers with a spunbond process. The base substrate has a minimum filtration efficiency of about 50%, measured in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test procedure A nanofiber layer is deposited on one side of the base substrate. The composite filter media structure has a minimum filtration efficiency of about 75%, measured in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test procedure.
In another aspect, a filter element is provided. The filter element includes a first end cap, a second end cap, and a composite filter media structure. The composite filter media structure includes a base substrate that includes a nonwoven synthetic fabric formed from a plurality of fibers with a spunbond process, the base substrate having a minimum filtration efficiency of about 50%, measured in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test procedure. A nanofiber layer is deposited on one side of the base substrate. The composite filter media structure has a minimum filtration efficiency of about 75%, measured in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test procedure.
A composite filter media for filter assemblies is described in detail below. In an exemplary embodiment, the composite filter media includes a media substrate of a synthetic nonwoven fabric that is formed from bicomponent fibers by a unique spunbond process. A nanofiber layer is deposited on at least one side of the media substrate. The composite media provides an initial filtration efficiency of about 75% or greater retained capture of 0.4 μm particles, when tested in accordance with the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 52.2-1999 test procedure, which is about a 20% increase in performance compared to known filter media. In addition, the composite media provides the 75% efficiency at a greater than 30% lower pressure drop than known filter media. The composite filter media is more durable than known filter media and provides for lower pressure drop build-up because of less deflection of the filter media from the forces exerted on the filter media during the filtering and reverse cleaning operations. The composite filter media may have a quality factor (Qf) of greater than about 450, and in another embodiment, greater than about 500. Also, the composite filter media may have a resistance (or pressure drop) of less than 4.0 mm water, measured in accordance with EN-1822 (1998), with the base media substrate having a resistance of less than about 2.5 mm water, measured in accordance with EN-1822 (1998). Further, the spunbond media substrate is more efficient than known filter media substrates at an equivalent or lower pressure drop. The bicomponent fibers used to form the media substrate are finer than fibers used to form known filter media. Further, the nanofiber membrane layer has a higher basis weight than known filter media which permits the filter media to clean down more effectively under reverse pulse cleaning than known filter media. The high basis weight of the nanofiber layer provides for a durable three dimensional surface filtration layer which has an extensive tortuous path that permits high efficiency and fine particle capture without substantially restricting air flow or increasing pressure drop.
By “quality factor (Qf)” is meant the parameter defined by the equation:
Qf=−25000·log(P/100)/Δp
Where “P”=particle penetration in % and “Δp”=pressure drop across the media in Pascals.
By “resistance” is meant the resistance (pressure drop) as measured using the test method described in EN 1822 (1998).
Referring to the drawings,
Media substrate 12 is a nonwoven fabric formed from synthetic bicomponent fibers using a spunbond process. The nonwoven fabric includes bicomponent fibers having a thermoplastic fiber component added to the nonwoven fabric during its production. Suitable bicomponent fibers are fibers having a core-sheath structure, an island structure or a side-by-side structure. Referring also to
Bicomponent fibers 30 have diameter of about 12 microns to about 18 microns which is finer than the known fibers used in traditional and common spunbond products. A unique aspect of base media substrate 12 is the bond pattern used to consolidate spunbond base media 12. The bond pattern is defined by the embossing pattern of the calender rolls. Traditional spunbond media used in filtration have a bond area (land area) of around 19 to 24 percent. The bond area provides for media durability and function while at the same time the bond points create areas of fused polymer that have zero air flow.
Referring also to
Any suitable synthetic bicomponent fiber 30 can be used to make the nonwoven fabric of media substrate 12. Suitable materials for core 32 and sheath 34 of bicomponent fiber 30 include, but are not limited to, polyester, polyamide, polyolefin, thermoplastic polyurethane, polyetherimide, polyphenyl ether, polyphenylene sulfide, polysulfone, aramid, and mixtures thereof. Suitable materials for the sheath of the bicomponent fiber include thermoplastic materials that have a lower melting point than the material of the core of the bi-component fiber, for example polyester, polyamide, polyolefin, thermoplastic polyurethane, polyetherimide, polyphenyl ether, polyphenylene sulfide, polysulfone, aramid, and mixtures thereof.
In the exemplary embodiment, nanofiber layer 20 is formed by an electro-blown spinning process that includes feeding a polymer solution into a spinning nozzle, applying a high voltage to the spinning nozzle, and discharging the polymer solution through the spinning nozzle while injecting compressed air into the lower end of the spinning nozzle. The applied high voltage ranges from about 1 kV to about 300 kV. The electro-blown spinning process of forming nanofibers and the unique apparatus used is described in detail in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/00677332. The electro-blown spinning process provides a durable three dimensional filtration layer of nanofibers that is thicker than known nanofiber filtration layers on known filter media. In the exemplary embodiment the basis weight of nanofiber layer 20 is about 0.6 g/m2 to about 20 g/m2, in another embodiment, about 2 g/m2 to about 20 g/m2, in another embodiment, about 5 g/m2 to about 10 g/m2, in another embodiment, about 1.5 g/m2 to about 2.5 g/m2. The nanofibers in nanofiber layer 20 have an average diameter of about 500 nm or less.
In alternate embodiments, nanofiber layer 20 may be formed by electrospinning, centrifugal spinning, or melt blowing. Classical electrospinning is a technique described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,127,706. A high voltage is applied to a polymer in solution to create nanofibers and nonwoven mats. However, total throughput in electrospinning processes is too low to be viable in forming heavier basis weight webs. Centrifugal spinning is a fiber forming process that includes supplying a spinning solution having at least one polymer dissolved in at least one solvent to a rotary sprayer having a rotating conical nozzle. The nozzle has a concave inner surface and a forward surface discharge edge. The spinning solution moves through the rotary sprayer along the concave inner surface so as to distribute the spinning solution toward the forward surface of the discharge edge of the nozzle. Separate fibrous streams are formed from the spinning solution while the solvent vaporizes to produce polymeric fibers in the presence or absence of an electrical field. A shaping fluid can flow around the nozzle to direct the spinning solution away from the rotary sprayer. The fibers are collected onto a collector to form a nanofiber web. In addition, melt blowing is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,425.
Media substrate 12 has a high air permeability compared to known filter media which permits improved mechanical adhesion of the nanofibers to media substrate 12. As nanofiber layer 20 is applied to first side 14 of media substrate 12, a vacuum may be applied from second side 16 of media substrate during the electro-blown spinning process to hold the nanofibers on the substrate. In combination with the drying temperatures used in the application of nanofiber layer 12, softening of sheath portion 34 of bicomponent fiber 30 occurs and nanofiber layer 20 is further densified and bonded to spunbond base media substrate 12. In combination with the high air permeability of media substrate 12, the effectiveness of the vacuum becomes more effective which provides for a strong mechanical bond of the nanofibers to the bicomponent fibers of media substrate 12.
Suitable polymers for forming nanofibers by the electro-blown spinning process are not restricted to thermoplastic polymers, and may include thermosetting polymers. Suitable polymers include, but are not limited to, polyimides, polyamides (nylon), polyaramides, polybenzimidazoles, polyetherimides, polyacrylonitriles, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polyanilines, polyethylene oxides, polyethylene naphthalates, polybutylene terephthalate, styrene butadiene rubber, polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylidene chloride, polyvinyl butylene, polyacetal, polyamide, polyester, polyolefins, cellulose ether and ester, polyalkylene sulfide, polyarylene oxide, polysulfone, modified polysulfone polymers, and mixtures thereof. Also, materials that fall within the generic classes of poly (vinylchloride), polymethylmethacrylate (and other acrylic resins), polystyrene, and copolymers thereof (including ABA type block copolymers), poly (vinylidene fluoride), poly (vinylidene chloride), polyvinylalcohol in various degrees of hydrolysis (87% to 99.5%) in crosslinked and non-crosslinked forms may be used and copolymer or derivative compounds thereof. One suitable class of polyamide condensation polymers are nylon materials, such as nylon-6, nylon-6, 6, nylon 6, 6-6, 10, and the like. The polymer solution is prepared by selecting a solvent that dissolves the selected polymers. The polymer solution can be mixed with additives, for example, plasticizers, ultraviolet ray stabilizers, crosslink agents, curing agents, reaction initiators, and the like. Although dissolving the polymers may not require any specific temperature ranges, heating may be needed for assisting the dissolution reaction.
It can be advantageous to add plasticizers to the various polymers described above, in order to reduce the Tg of the fiber polymer. Suitable plasticizers will depend upon the polymer, as well as upon the particular end use of the nanofiber layer. For example, nylon polymers can be plasticized with water or even residual solvent remaining from the electrospinning or electro-blown spinning process. Other plasticizers which can be useful in lowering polymer Tg include, but are not limited to, aliphatic glycols, aromatic sulphanomides, phthalate esters, including but not limited to, dibutyl phthalate, dihexl phthalate, dicyclohexyl phthalate, dioctyl phthalate, diisodecyl phthalate, diundecyl phthalate, didodecanyl phthalate, and diphenyl phthalate, and the like.
Flat sheets of base media substrate 12 test samples having various basis weights were compared to a comparative base media substrate in a flat sheet fractional efficiency test in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test method. Air containing KCl particles was directed through each test sample at a flow rate of about 10 ft/min.
Flat sheets of base media substrate 12, and base media substrate 12 including nanofiber layer 20 were compared to a comparative base media substrate with and without a nanofiber layer in a flat sheet fractional efficiency test in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test method. Air containing KCl particles was directed through each test sample at a flow rate of about 10 ft/min.
Flat sheets of base media substrate 12, and base media substrate 12 including nanofiber layer 20 were compared to a comparative base media substrate with and without a nanofiber layer in a flat sheet pressure drop test in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test method. Air containing KCl particles was directed through each test sample at a flow rate of about 10 ft/min.
The above described filter elements 50 formed from filter media 10 can be used for filtering an air stream in almost any application, for example, for filtering gas turbine inlet air. The unique construction of filter media 10 is more durable than known filter media and provides for relatively lower pressure drop build-up because of less deflection from the forces exerted on the filter media during the filtering and reverse cleaning operations. Filter elements 50 can produce an average efficiency greater than about 75% capture of the most penetrating particle size of aerosol or dust (about 0.3 to about 0.4 micron) as compared to an efficiency of about 50-55% of known filter elements. Also, nanofiber layer 20 has a higher basis weight than known filter media which permits filter media 10 to clean down more effectively under reverse pulse cleaning than known filter media. Further, the high basis weight of nanofiber layer 20 provides for a durable three dimensional surface filtration layer which has an extensive tortuous path that permits high efficiency and fine particle capture without restricting air flow or increasing pressure drop.
The example filter media of Examples 1-2 and Comparative Examples 3-7 illustrate a comparison of embodiments of filter media 10 with known filter media. Efficiency, resistance and quality factor were measured for each filter media of Examples 1-2 and Comparative Examples 3-7. Efficiency was measured in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-1999 test procedure, resistance was measured in accordance with EN-1822 (1998), and quality factor Qf was calculated as described above.
Example 1 is a spunbond polyester bicomponent fiber base media substrate, and Example 2 is the base media substrate of Example 1 plus a 2 g/m2 nanofiber layer formed by an electro-blown spinning process. Comparative Example 3 is a known drylaid polyester base media substrate, and Comparative Example 4 is the known dry-laid polyester base media substrate of Comparative Example 3 plus a 2 g/m2 nanofiber layer. Comparative Example 5 is a wet-laid synthetic paper plus a <0.5 g/m2 nanofiber layer. Comparative Example 6 is a wet-laid synthetic paper, and Comparative Example 7 is the wet-laid synthetic paper of Example 6 plus a 20 g/m2 meltblown fiber layer. The example results are shown in Table 1 below. When Example 2 is compared to composites in Comparative Examples 4, 5, and 7 efficiency is not sacrificed at the expense of reducing resistance which yields the associated high Quality Factor values.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/843,228, filed Aug. 22, 2007, which claims priority to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/893,008, filed Mar. 5, 2007.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4650506 | Barris et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 5364456 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5437910 | Raabe et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5667562 | Midkiff | Sep 1997 | A |
| 6110249 | Medcalf et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6165572 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6274521 | Barbier et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6315806 | Torobin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6368386 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6395048 | Yoder et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6485811 | Horiguchi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6656400 | Veeser et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6673136 | Gallingham et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6706086 | Emig et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6716274 | Gogins et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6740142 | Buettner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743273 | Chung et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746517 | Benson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6800117 | Barris et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6858057 | Healey | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6872311 | Koslow | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875256 | Gillingham et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6924028 | Chung et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6994742 | Barris et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7008465 | Graham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7090715 | Chung et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7235122 | Bryner et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 20040060268 | Chung et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131820 | Turner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255783 | Graham et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050067732 | Kim et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235619 | Heinz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060089072 | Baker et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137317 | Bryner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070084786 | Smithies | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20080113573 | Acosta et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134652 | Lim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080302072 | Hassmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080315465 | Smithies et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4137627 | Nov 1991 | DE |
| 1970111 | Sep 2008 | EP |
| 1117900 | Jun 1968 | GB |
| 1376888 | Dec 1974 | GB |
| 8209489 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 9911355 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 03080905 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2004018079 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2004069378 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2006071979 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2009085679 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080314010 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60893008 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11843228 | Aug 2007 | US |
| Child | 12184577 | US |
