Composite I-beam member

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8910455
  • Patent Number
    8,910,455
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 21, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 16, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Katcheves; Basil
    • Mintz; Rodney
    Agents
    • Law Office of Dorian Cartwright
Abstract
A composite steel I-beam member. The member includes confined top and bottom flanges, and a composite laminated web. The confined flange comprises a wooden core and a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core. The overall load carrying capacity of the composite I-beam is significantly increased through a list of composite actions occurring in the individual components and their connections. Most importantly, a two-way lateral interaction can be normal to the interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core and provide an amount of compressive support to the top flange surpassing the sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally, to construction material, and more specifically, to a composite I-beam member used for construction.


BACKGROUND

I-beams are shaped like the letter ā€œIā€ to maximize the moment of inertia, which in turn maximizes its resistance to bending and deflection when used as a beam or floor joist. It is well known that I-beams are the most efficient structural members when subjected to bending, and they are widely used in both light-framed and heavy-duty constructions.


In light-framed construction, support for structures is conventionally provided by members composed of a single material, predominantly either wood or metal. These single-material members are often vulnerable to failure due to characteristics of the material. For example, while wood is weak in tension and very vulnerable to fire and termites; a metal stud has inherent problems of pre-mature failure due to weak connection and local buckling. Conventional steel I-beams can be very heavy. Furthermore, use of certain materials can have a negative effect on the environment. For example, inefficient use of timber wastes trees, a valuable natural resource. Also, timber is often treated for use in exterior construction which can add pollutants to the environment. In another example, pressure treated wood produces a large volume of waste water with pollutants.


In heavy duty construction, composite techniques are often used to achieve higher structural performance. A composite structure combines different materials together to form a new structure. Since it fully utilizes the potential of individual materials, the advantages of composite structures have been well recognized in the engineering community during the past decades.


However, past applications, such as concrete-filled steel tubes and composite floor decks, mostly involve combining steel and concrete in various forms, and are primarily used in commercial buildings and infrastructures.


What is needed is to introduce composite techniques in light-framed construction to allow for lighter and stronger I-beam members.


SUMMARY

The above needs are met by an apparatus, system, method and method of manufacture for a composite I-beam member.


In one embodiment, a confined top flange comprises a wooden core and a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core and two inner side walls of an rectangular channel slotted along the longitudinal direction within the wooden core. The metal jacket is pre-stressed to confine the wooden core, providing a two-way lateral interaction. The two-way lateral interaction can be normal to the interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core and, when subjected to compression, provide an amount of support to the top flange surpassing the sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately.


A confined bottom flange comprising substantially a mirror image of the composite top flange. When subjected to tension, the metal jacket alone is capable of providing adequate tensile force to counteract the compressive force of the top flange.


In an embodiment, the composite laminated web comprises a wooden board sandwiched between two light-gauged metal covers. The wooden board provides lateral support to the metal sheet and prevents it from pre-mature lateral buckling, so that the metal sheet can develop the full tensile potential of the metal material, which is so-called one-way lateral interaction. The one-way interaction can also be normal to an interface between the outer metal sheets and the inner wooden board. When subjected to shear force, the shear capacity is mostly provided by the metal sheet, and the wooden board itself provides very little shear capacity if any at all.


A composite laminated web can have a top edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined bottom flange using metal connectors. The metal connectors can penetrate an entire width of the composite top and bottom flanges at, for example, the mid-height of inner side walls of the slotted channel. In one embodiment, a localized composite action at the connection between the laminated web and confined flange can increase the capacity of the dowel connection significantly. This composite action is similar to the two-way lateral interaction of the flange, but at a localized region around each metal connector. In this case, the confinement effect is originated from the pre-compression of the metal connector, not the metal jacket. For example, tightening of a nut to a pre-compression when the connector is a bolt.


Advantageously, the composite I-beam member is stronger than wood I-beams, and is also lighter than conventional steel I-beams.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples of the invention, the invention is not limited to the examples depicted in the figures.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating two different views of a composite I-beam member, according to an embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a first view of an exploded schematic diagram illustrating a composite I-beam member, according to an embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a second view of an exploded schematic diagram illustrating a composite I-beam member, according to an embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a method for producing a composite I-beam to provide support to a structure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An apparatus, system, method, and method of manufacture for a composite I-beam member, are described herein. The following detailed description is intended to provide example implementations to one of ordinary skill in the art, and is not intended to limit the invention to the explicit disclosure, as one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that variations can be substituted that are within the scope of the invention as described.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating two different views of a composite I-beam member 100, according to an embodiment. The member 100 comprises a wooden core 110 and a metal jacket 120 wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core. The wooden core 110 can be manufactured from an appropriate construction grade lumber, a solid natural wood, an engineered wood or pressed wood. Other materials can be substituted for the wooden core within the spirit of the current invention. The metal jacket 120 can be any type of sheet metal, such as a light-gauged cold-formed steel sheet, an aluminum sheet, a copper sheet, an alloy or any appropriate substitute material.


The member 100 can be a conventional I-beam configuration having a web, a top flange and a bottom flange, as is discussed below with respect to FIG. 2. The dimensions and ratio of the web to flanges can be modified for a particular use (e.g., floor beam versus post). The wooden core 110 can also be shaped as a square, a rectangle, a circle, or any appropriate shape. The member can serve as any type of supporting member, for interior or exterior construction, including a beam, post, or joist, used individually or as part of a combination of members.


The member 100 is configured as a confined top flange and a confined bottom flange coupled to either end of a composite laminated web. In one embodiment, the metal jacket 120A is wrapped around the top core 110A, in a pre-stressed manner, to provide a two-way lateral interaction. The interaction can be normal to an interface between the metal jacket 120A and the wooden core 110A. When the top core is subjected to compression, the two-way lateral interaction generates an amount of support to the top flange that surpasses a sum of an amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately. In other words, the two-way lateral interaction makes the composite top flange stronger than the individual components.


More specifically, the wooden core 110A fails at a certain pressure at which the wood dilates. As the wood dilates, splits within the wooden core 110 open up spaces that span the length or height by opening up spaces within. However, the metal jacket 120A resists the splitting action and maintains integrity in the wooden core 110A beyond the point of individual failure. As a result, the compressive strength and ductility of the top flange is increased.


Similarly, the metal jacket 120A fails at a certain pressure at which the metal buckles. As the metal buckles, rather than opening up spaces as does the wood, the metal folds over itself. In response, the wooden core 110A resists the buckling action and maintains integrity in the metal jacket 120A beyond the point of individual failure. Further, premature local buckling is prevented.



FIGS. 2 and 3 are first and second views of an exploded schematic diagram illustrating a composite I-beam member, according to an embodiment. The exploded view highlights individual components of the member 100. The member 100 includes a wooden top flange 110A, a wooden bottom flange 110B and a wooden web 110C. Further, the member 100 includes a metal top flange 120A, a metal bottom flange 120B, and metal web sheets 120C. Also, member includes bolts 120D that can be metal.


Metal jackets are wrapped around wooden cores. For example, the metal top flange 120A is wrapped around the wooden top flange 110A, and the other parts are similarly wrapped. In more detail, the metal top flange 120A wraps around surface portions of the wooden top flange 110A, and in some embodiments, along the inner side walls of a slotted channel spanning a length of the wooden top flange 110A. In some embodiments, the two opposing inner side walls of the slotted channel are wrapped while a third end side remains unwrapped. The metal top flange 120A is wrapped to generate a pre-stress for confinement of the wooden top flange 110A. The bottom flange 120B can be substantially a mirror image of the top flange 120A.


The wooden top and bottom flanges 110A and 110B are both slotted along the length to form a channel in the center of one surface. The width of the slotted channel is slightly wider than the thickness of the wooden web 110C, so as to accommodate the thickness of wooden web 110C plus the edges of four layers of light-gauged metal. When the bottom flange is subjected to tension, there is no meaningful composite action in some embodiments (i.e., no one-way or two-way lateral interaction). The metal jacket 120B alone is capable of providing tensile capacity, and that of the wooden core 110B becomes negligible.


In an embodiment, the composite laminated web comprises a wooden board sandwiched between two light-gauged metal covers. The wooden web 110C provides lateral support to the metal web sheet 120C and prevent it from pre-mature lateral buckling, so that the metal sheet can develop the full tensile potential of the metal material, which is so-called one-way lateral interaction. The one-way interaction can also be normal to an interface between the outer metal sheets and the inner wooden board. When subjected to shear force, the shear capacity is mostly provided by the metal sheet, and the wooden board itself provide very little shear capacity if any at all.


The composite laminated web only accounts for shear force support. In one embodiment, the wooden web 110C is sandwiched by the metal web sheets 120C, and provide a one-way lateral interaction. The interaction can be normal to an interface between the metal sheet 120C and the wooden web 110C. More specifically, the wooden web 110C provides lateral support to the metal sheet and prevent it from pre-mature lateral buckling, so that the metal sheet can develop the full tensile potential of the metal material. The shear capacity is mostly provided by the metal sheet, and the wooden web 110C primarily help to increase the shear capacity of the metal sheets, but the wooden web 110C itself provides very little shear capacity if any at all. In another embodiment, the composite action of the laminated web can increase the capacity of the dowel connection 120D significantly. The presence of wooden web 110C can prevent pre-mature tear-off failure of the metal sheets, and the confinement effect of metal sheets that sandwich the wooden web 110C can significantly increase local bearing capacity of wooden web 110C, so that a much higher shear force can be reliably transferred between the web and flange through the connectors 120D.


In one embodiment, localized composite action at the connection between the laminated web and confined flange can increase the connection capacity significantly. This composite action is similar to the two-way lateral interaction of the flange, but at a localized region around each metal connector. In this case, the confinement effect is originated from the pre-compression of the metal connector, not the metal jacket. For example, tightening of a nut to a pre-compression when the connector is a bolt.


Bolts 120D can be used not only to hold the wrapping, but also to connect the top and bottom flanges to the web. The bolts can comprise a steel through-bolt, a rivet, a screw, a nail, or any other appropriate connector. As shown, one configuration of bolts 120D run in substantially equal increments from one end of the web to the other along both edges. An individual bolt 120D penetrates an entire width of the flanges. More particularly, the bolt 120D penetrates the wooden top flange 110A and the wooden web 110C as well as six layers of metal jackets including: two metal jackets on the outer surfaces of the wooden top flange 110A (i.e., 120A), two metal jackets on the inner side walls of the slotted channel (i.e., 120A) and two metal jackets on outer surfaces of the web (i.e., 120C). The metal jackets 120, in some embodiments, include pre-drilled holes corresponding to pre-configured placement of bolts 120D.


The metal jackets 120C for the web can further include a pattern of pre-punched teeth. Any pattern variation of teeth are possible. As shown, the teeth are evenly spaced horizontally and vertically in a crisscross pattern. The teeth bind to the wood.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a method 400 for producing a composite I-beam to provide support to a structure.


At step 410, a confined top flange is provided. The confined top flange can comprise a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of a wooden core, and along the two inner side walls of a rectangular channel slotted along the wooden core. The metal jacket can be pre-stressed to confine the wooden core. The pre-stress generates a two-way lateral interactions that, in some embodiments, is normal to an interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core. The two-way later interaction allows the member to provide an amount of support surpassing a sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately.


At step 420, a confined bottom flange is provided. In an embodiment, the confined bottom flange is substantially a mirror image of the confined top flange.


At step 430, a laminated web is provided. The laminated web can have a top edge portion inserted into the slotted channel within the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into the slotted channel within the confined bottom flange. Then, the laminated web is locked to both top and bottom flanges using metal connectors. The connectors can penetrate an entire width of the top and bottom flanges in the middle-depth of the slotted channel along the length of the member.


In summary, the overall load carrying capacity of the composite I-beam is significantly increased through a list of composite actions occurring in the individual components and their connections. Specifically, (1) the compression capacity of the flanges is increased through the two-way lateral interaction; (2) the tension capacity of the flanges is increased because metal has very high tensile capacity by nature; (3) shear capacity of the web is increased through the one-way lateral interaction; and (4) the shear capacity of the connection is also increased through localized composite action similar to the two-way lateral interaction. The end result is a light weight composite I-beam that has very high strength and ductility.


The disclosure herein is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A composite I-beam member to provide support to a structure, comprising: a confined top flange comprising a wooden core and a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core and two opposing inner side walls of a rectangular channel slotted within the wooden core, wherein the metal jacket is pre-stressed to confine the wooden core, providing a two-way lateral interaction normal to an interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core and, when subjected to compression, providing an amount of support to the top flange surpassing the sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately;a confined bottom flange comprising substantially a mirror image of the confined top flange; anda composite laminated web, having a top edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined bottom flange using metal connectors that penetrate an entire width of the confined top and bottom flanges through the two inner side walls of the rectangular channel,wherein the composite laminated web comprises: a wooden web sandwiched between two pieces of light-gauged metal covers, the metal covers being bonded to the wooden web and being laterally supported by the wooden web which provides a one-way lateral interaction normal to an interface between the metal covers and the wooden web, and when subjected to shear forces, providing an amount of support to the structure surpassing the amount of support provided by the metal covers when being used without the wooden web, wherein the metal covers each comprise a plurality of teeth that bind a metal sheet to the wooden web,wherein the metal connectors penetrate the two inner side walls of the rectangular channel and six-layers of metal jackets including both metal jackets of outer side walls of a composite flange perimeter, both metal jackets of the inner side walls of the rectangular channel of the top or bottom flange, and both metal jackets of long sides of a perimeter portion of the composite laminated web engaged within the slotted rectangular channel of the top or bottom flange.
  • 2. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal connectors are selected from the group consisting of: steel through-bolt, rivet, screw, and nail.
  • 3. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal jacket and wooden cores of the confined top and bottom flanges comprise a plurality of pre-drilled holes corresponding to pre-configured placement of the metal connectors.
  • 4. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein a plurality of connectors span along a length of the confined top and bottom flanges.
  • 5. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the wooden core of the confined top and bottom flanges is selected from the group consisting of: a solid nature wood, and an engineered wood.
  • 6. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal jacket of the confined top and bottom flanges is selected from the group consisting of: a light-gauged cold-formed steel sheet, a stainless steel sheet, an aluminum sheet, a copper sheet, and an alloy sheet.
  • 7. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein a shape of a cross-section of the wooden core of the confined top and bottom flanges is one of selected from the group consisting of: a square, a rectangle, and a circle.
  • 8. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal jacket of the confined top and bottom flanges comprises a pattern of pre-punched teeth used to attach the metal jacket to the wooden core.
  • 9. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal jacket of the confined top and bottom flanges provide lateral confinement for the wooden core to increase compressive strength and ductility of the wooden core.
  • 10. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the wooden core of the confined top and bottom flanges provides lateral support for the metal jacket to prevent pre-mature local buckling failure of the metal jacket.
  • 11. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein additional amount of support is achieved through the interaction between the wooden core of the confined top and bottom flanges and metal jacket to enhance the compressive strength and ductility of the composite I-beam member to a level that is substantially higher than the sum of the wooden core and the metal jacket when used alone.
  • 12. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the wooden web of the composite laminated web is composed of at least one of: plywood board, oriented strand board (OSB board), and particle board made of waste-wood.
  • 13. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal cover of the composite laminated web is composed of at least one of: a light-gauged cold-formed steel sheet, a stainless steel sheet, an aluminum sheet, a copper sheet, and an alloy sheet.
  • 14. The composite I-beam member of claim 1, wherein the metal covers and wooden web of the composite laminated web comprise a plurality of pre-drilled holes corresponding to pre-configured placement of the metal connectors.
  • 15. A composite I-beam member to provide support to a structure, comprising: a confined top flange comprising a wooden core and a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core and two opposing inner side walls of a rectangular channel slotted within the wooden core, wherein the metal jacket is pre-stressed to confine the wooden core, providing a two-way lateral interaction normal to an interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core and, when subjected to compression, providing an amount of support to the top flange surpassing the sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately;a confined bottom flange comprising substantially a mirror image of the confined top flange, wherein the metal jacket of the confined top and bottom flanges comprises a pattern of pre-punched teeth used to attach the metal jacket to the wooden core; anda composite laminated web, having a top edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined bottom flange using metal connectors that penetrate an entire width of the confined top and bottom flanges through the two inner side walls of the rectangular channel,wherein the composite laminated web comprises: a wooden web sandwiched between two pieces of light-gauged metal covers, the metal covers being bonded to the wooden web and being laterally supported by the wooden web which provides a one-way lateral interaction normal to an interface between the metal covers and the wooden web, and when subjected to shear forces, providing an amount of support to the structure surpassing the amount of support provided by the metal covers when being used without the wooden web, wherein the metal covers each comprise a plurality of teeth that bind a metal sheet to the wooden web,wherein the metal connectors penetrate the two inner side walls of the rectangular channel and six-layers of metal jackets including both metal jackets of outer side walls of a composite flange perimeter, both metal jackets of the inner side walls of the rectangular channel of the top or bottom flange, and both metal jackets of long sides of a perimeter portion of the composite laminated web engaged within the slotted rectangular channel of the top or bottom flange.
  • 16. A method of providing support to a structure using a composite I-beam member, the method comprising the steps of: providing a confined top flange comprising a wooden core and a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core and two opposing inner side walls of a rectangular channel slotted within the wooden core, wherein the metal jacket is pre-stressed to confine the wooden core, providing a two-way lateral interaction normal to an interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core and, when subjected to compression, providing an amount of support to the top flange surpassing the sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately;providing a confined bottom flange comprising substantially a mirror image of the confined top flange; andproviding a composite laminated web, having a top edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined bottom flange using metal connectors that penetrate an entire width of the confined top and bottom flanges through the two inner side walls of the rectangular channel,wherein the composite laminated web comprises: a wooden web sandwiched between two pieces of light-gauged metal covers, the metal covers being bonded to the wooden web and being laterally supported by the wooden web which provides a one-way lateral interaction normal to an interface between the metal covers and the wooden web, and when subjected to shear forces, providing an amount of support to the structure surpassing the amount of support provided by the metal covers when being used without the wooden web, wherein the metal covers each comprise a plurality of teeth that bind a metal sheet to the wooden web,wherein the metal connectors penetrate the two inner side walls of the rectangular channel and six-layers of metal jackets including both metal jackets of outer side walls of a composite flange perimeter, both metal jackets of the inner side walls of the rectangular channel of the top or bottom flange, and both metal jackets of long sides of a perimeter portion of the composite laminated web engaged within the slotted rectangular channel of the top or bottom flange.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority as a continuation-in-part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/225,518, filed on Sep. 5, 2011, entitled COMPOSITE GUARDRAIL POSTS AND COMPOSITE FLOOR I-JOIST, by WeiHong Yang, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/804,601, entitled STEEL-WOOD COMPOSITE STRUCTURE WITH METAL JACKET WOOD STUDS AND RODS, by WeiHong Yang, the contents of each being hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (176)
Number Name Date Kind
96793 Gatling Nov 1869 A
1368594 Aatila Feb 1921 A
1453996 Riddle May 1923 A
1615815 Birdsey Jan 1927 A
2039398 Dye May 1936 A
2099470 Coddington Nov 1937 A
2125692 Ragsdale et al. Aug 1938 A
2126622 Davis Aug 1938 A
2167835 Greulich Aug 1939 A
2167836 Greulich Aug 1939 A
2187280 Olson Jan 1940 A
2200159 Davis May 1940 A
2387432 Du Laney Oct 1945 A
2918150 Blum Dec 1959 A
3294608 Peterson Dec 1966 A
3349537 Hopfeld Oct 1967 A
3385015 Hadley May 1968 A
3531901 Will, Jr. et al. Oct 1970 A
3531903 Swanson Oct 1970 A
3605360 Lindal Sep 1971 A
3728837 Kiefer, Jr. Apr 1973 A
3866884 Heil et al. Feb 1975 A
3913290 Billing et al. Oct 1975 A
4001993 Daniels Jan 1977 A
4047354 Sutherland Sep 1977 A
4098109 Cailloux Jul 1978 A
4281497 Luotenen et al. Aug 1981 A
4335555 Southerland et al. Jun 1982 A
4430373 Hammarberg Feb 1984 A
4446668 Christ-Janer May 1984 A
4501102 Knowles Feb 1985 A
4586550 Kitipornchai May 1986 A
4615163 Curtis et al. Oct 1986 A
4738071 Ezard Apr 1988 A
4974387 Dufour Dec 1990 A
5308675 Crane et al. May 1994 A
5323584 Scarlett Jun 1994 A
5497595 Kalinin Mar 1996 A
5503493 Kato et al. Apr 1996 A
5511355 Dingler Apr 1996 A
5533309 Rivin Jul 1996 A
5556565 Kirkwood et al. Sep 1996 A
5577353 Simpson Nov 1996 A
5580648 Castle et al. Dec 1996 A
5617685 Meier et al. Apr 1997 A
5617697 Erwin Apr 1997 A
5688426 Kirkwood et al. Nov 1997 A
5713169 Meier et al. Feb 1998 A
5809735 LeBlanc Sep 1998 A
5832691 Callahan et al. Nov 1998 A
5852908 Nankin Dec 1998 A
5875604 Rudd Mar 1999 A
5875605 Rudd Mar 1999 A
5899239 Coulis May 1999 A
5974760 Tingley Nov 1999 A
6050047 Covelli et al. Apr 2000 A
6061995 Menchetti et al. May 2000 A
6105321 KarisAllen et al. Aug 2000 A
6134859 Rudd Oct 2000 A
6167675 LeBlanc Jan 2001 B1
6173550 Tingley Jan 2001 B1
6250042 Rudd Jun 2001 B1
6260328 Fowler et al. Jul 2001 B1
6332301 Goldzak Dec 2001 B1
6343453 Wright Feb 2002 B1
6412247 Menchetti et al. Jul 2002 B1
6412248 Rudd Jul 2002 B1
6457292 Vrana Oct 2002 B1
6460310 Ford et al. Oct 2002 B1
6505454 Dingler Jan 2003 B2
6516583 Houghton Feb 2003 B1
6516584 Rudd Feb 2003 B1
6519911 Sawada Feb 2003 B1
6561736 Doleshal May 2003 B1
6594964 Charland Jul 2003 B2
6715257 Kent et al. Apr 2004 B2
6729607 Alberson et al. May 2004 B2
6735919 diGirolamo et al. May 2004 B1
6749709 Krishnawswamy et al. Jun 2004 B1
6886296 John et al. May 2005 B1
6895723 Knokey et al. May 2005 B2
6902150 Alberson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6938392 Fouad et al. Sep 2005 B2
6941718 diGirolamo et al. Sep 2005 B1
6986205 Vrana Jan 2006 B2
6993883 Belanger Feb 2006 B2
7168220 Owoc Jan 2007 B2
7213379 Carlson et al. May 2007 B2
7299596 Hildreth Nov 2007 B2
7310920 Hovey, Jr. Dec 2007 B2
7464512 Perina Dec 2008 B1
7543369 Burkett Jun 2009 B2
7818945 Gregg et al. Oct 2010 B2
7882679 Carlson et al. Feb 2011 B2
7930866 Carlson et al. Apr 2011 B2
8065848 Carlson et al. Nov 2011 B2
8161712 Mackenzie Apr 2012 B2
8166721 diGirolamo et al. May 2012 B1
8225580 Peneder Jul 2012 B2
8266856 Carlson et al. Sep 2012 B2
8322037 Carlson et al. Dec 2012 B2
8329272 Cesternino Dec 2012 B2
8387333 Brekke Mar 2013 B2
8438808 Carlson et al. May 2013 B2
8468774 Garry Jun 2013 B2
8511043 Fyfe Aug 2013 B2
8555601 Brunner Oct 2013 B2
8621797 Kim et al. Jan 2014 B2
8650820 Bocquet et al. Feb 2014 B2
20010048101 Bligh et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020024043 Albritton Feb 2002 A1
20020026762 Charland Mar 2002 A1
20020073641 Menchetti et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088967 Lewis et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020112428 Dingler Aug 2002 A1
20020144484 Vrana Oct 2002 A1
20020158241 Ochoa Oct 2002 A1
20020166306 Wilson Nov 2002 A1
20030194931 Crigler Oct 2003 A1
20040040253 Knokey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040226254 Charlwood Nov 2004 A1
20040226255 Holloway Nov 2004 A1
20050166530 Wilson Aug 2005 A1
20050252165 Hubbell et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050284078 Marsland Dec 2005 A1
20060000152 Davis Jan 2006 A1
20060032182 Carlson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060070339 Peneder Apr 2006 A1
20060070340 Fanucci et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060156682 McAndrew et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060191235 Peek et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070119108 Downard May 2007 A1
20070131918 James Jun 2007 A1
20070137137 Peek et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151198 Ou Jul 2007 A1
20070175126 Tonyan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070175583 Mosallam Aug 2007 A1
20070193199 Carlson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070193212 Carlson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070256389 Davis Nov 2007 A1
20080159807 Andrews Jul 2008 A1
20080178551 Porter Jul 2008 A1
20080236058 Antonie Oct 2008 A1
20080282633 Buckhold Nov 2008 A1
20080295453 Carlson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080302037 Brown et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013640 Caroussos Jan 2009 A1
20090075031 Carlson et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090293405 Andrews et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100018143 Woerner et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100047489 Cesternino Feb 2010 A1
20100139181 Cortina-Cordero et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100207087 James Aug 2010 A1
20110005145 Contasti Jan 2011 A1
20110056156 Tonyan et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110113725 Garry May 2011 A1
20110155315 Von Pinnon Jun 2011 A1
20110167759 Cesternino Jul 2011 A1
20110179647 Carlson et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110219726 Brunner Sep 2011 A1
20110250417 Hubbell et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252743 Yang Oct 2011 A1
20120011805 Yang Jan 2012 A1
20120141706 Bocquet et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120222382 Brekke Sep 2012 A1
20120298943 Yang Nov 2012 A1
20130025222 Mueller Jan 2013 A1
20130055677 Hayden et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130133278 Kim et al. May 2013 A1
20130239512 Yang Sep 2013 A1
20130340384 Hayden et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130340385 Hayden et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140083046 Yang Mar 2014 A1
20140096476 Kim et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140182234 Yang Jul 2014 A1
20140182235 Yang Jul 2014 A9
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
1840836 Oct 2006 CN
115769 Aug 1984 EP
284494 Sep 1988 EP
2963819 Feb 2012 FR
11200557 Jul 1999 JP
2003343037 Dec 2003 JP
2007146617 Jun 2007 JP
WO 2011115713 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Machine Translation of JP 2007-146617 A retrieval from the JPO on Aug. 20, 2013, 2 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130160398 A1 Jun 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12804601 Mar 2010 US
Child 13225518 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13225518 Sep 2011 US
Child 13772338 US