The present invention relates generally, to construction material, and more specifically, to a composite I-beam member used for construction.
I-beams are shaped like the letter āIā to maximize the moment of inertia, which in turn maximizes its resistance to bending and deflection when used as a beam or floor joist. It is well known that I-beams are the most efficient structural members when subjected to bending, and they are widely used in both light-framed and heavy-duty constructions.
In light-framed construction, support for structures is conventionally provided by members composed of a single material, predominantly either wood or metal. These single-material members are often vulnerable to failure due to characteristics of the material. For example, while wood is weak in tension and very vulnerable to fire and termites; a metal stud has inherent problems of pre-mature failure due to weak connection and local buckling. Conventional steel I-beams can be very heavy. Furthermore, use of certain materials can have a negative effect on the environment. For example, inefficient use of timber wastes trees, a valuable natural resource. Also, timber is often treated for use in exterior construction which can add pollutants to the environment. In another example, pressure treated wood produces a large volume of waste water with pollutants.
In heavy duty construction, composite techniques are often used to achieve higher structural performance. A composite structure combines different materials together to form a new structure. Since it fully utilizes the potential of individual materials, the advantages of composite structures have been well recognized in the engineering community during the past decades.
However, past applications, such as concrete-filled steel tubes and composite floor decks, mostly involve combining steel and concrete in various forms, and are primarily used in commercial buildings and infrastructures.
What is needed is to introduce composite techniques in light-framed construction to allow for lighter and stronger I-beam members.
The above needs are met by an apparatus, system, method and method of manufacture for a composite I-beam member.
In one embodiment, a confined top flange comprises a wooden core and a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of the wooden core and two inner side walls of an rectangular channel slotted along the longitudinal direction within the wooden core. The metal jacket is pre-stressed to confine the wooden core, providing a two-way lateral interaction. The two-way lateral interaction can be normal to the interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core and, when subjected to compression, provide an amount of support to the top flange surpassing the sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately.
A confined bottom flange comprising substantially a mirror image of the composite top flange. When subjected to tension, the metal jacket alone is capable of providing adequate tensile force to counteract the compressive force of the top flange.
In an embodiment, the composite laminated web comprises a wooden board sandwiched between two light-gauged metal covers. The wooden board provides lateral support to the metal sheet and prevents it from pre-mature lateral buckling, so that the metal sheet can develop the full tensile potential of the metal material, which is so-called one-way lateral interaction. The one-way interaction can also be normal to an interface between the outer metal sheets and the inner wooden board. When subjected to shear force, the shear capacity is mostly provided by the metal sheet, and the wooden board itself provides very little shear capacity if any at all.
A composite laminated web can have a top edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into and locked with the confined bottom flange using metal connectors. The metal connectors can penetrate an entire width of the composite top and bottom flanges at, for example, the mid-height of inner side walls of the slotted channel. In one embodiment, a localized composite action at the connection between the laminated web and confined flange can increase the capacity of the dowel connection significantly. This composite action is similar to the two-way lateral interaction of the flange, but at a localized region around each metal connector. In this case, the confinement effect is originated from the pre-compression of the metal connector, not the metal jacket. For example, tightening of a nut to a pre-compression when the connector is a bolt.
Advantageously, the composite I-beam member is stronger than wood I-beams, and is also lighter than conventional steel I-beams.
In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples of the invention, the invention is not limited to the examples depicted in the figures.
An apparatus, system, method, and method of manufacture for a composite I-beam member, are described herein. The following detailed description is intended to provide example implementations to one of ordinary skill in the art, and is not intended to limit the invention to the explicit disclosure, as one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that variations can be substituted that are within the scope of the invention as described.
The member 100 can be a conventional I-beam configuration having a web, a top flange and a bottom flange, as is discussed below with respect to
The member 100 is configured as a confined top flange and a confined bottom flange coupled to either end of a composite laminated web. In one embodiment, the metal jacket 120A is wrapped around the top core 110A, in a pre-stressed manner, to provide a two-way lateral interaction. The interaction can be normal to an interface between the metal jacket 120A and the wooden core 110A. When the top core is subjected to compression, the two-way lateral interaction generates an amount of support to the top flange that surpasses a sum of an amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately. In other words, the two-way lateral interaction makes the composite top flange stronger than the individual components.
More specifically, the wooden core 110A fails at a certain pressure at which the wood dilates. As the wood dilates, splits within the wooden core 110 open up spaces that span the length or height by opening up spaces within. However, the metal jacket 120A resists the splitting action and maintains integrity in the wooden core 110A beyond the point of individual failure. As a result, the compressive strength and ductility of the top flange is increased.
Similarly, the metal jacket 120A fails at a certain pressure at which the metal buckles. As the metal buckles, rather than opening up spaces as does the wood, the metal folds over itself. In response, the wooden core 110A resists the buckling action and maintains integrity in the metal jacket 120A beyond the point of individual failure. Further, premature local buckling is prevented.
Metal jackets are wrapped around wooden cores. For example, the metal top flange 120A is wrapped around the wooden top flange 110A, and the other parts are similarly wrapped. In more detail, the metal top flange 120A wraps around surface portions of the wooden top flange 110A, and in some embodiments, along the inner side walls of a slotted channel spanning a length of the wooden top flange 110A. In some embodiments, the two opposing inner side walls of the slotted channel are wrapped while a third end side remains unwrapped. The metal top flange 120A is wrapped to generate a pre-stress for confinement of the wooden top flange 110A. The bottom flange 120B can be substantially a mirror image of the top flange 120A.
The wooden top and bottom flanges 110A and 110B are both slotted along the length to form a channel in the center of one surface. The width of the slotted channel is slightly wider than the thickness of the wooden web 110C, so as to accommodate the thickness of wooden web 110C plus the edges of four layers of light-gauged metal. When the bottom flange is subjected to tension, there is no meaningful composite action in some embodiments (i.e., no one-way or two-way lateral interaction). The metal jacket 120B alone is capable of providing tensile capacity, and that of the wooden core 110B becomes negligible.
In an embodiment, the composite laminated web comprises a wooden board sandwiched between two light-gauged metal covers. The wooden web 110C provides lateral support to the metal web sheet 120C and prevent it from pre-mature lateral buckling, so that the metal sheet can develop the full tensile potential of the metal material, which is so-called one-way lateral interaction. The one-way interaction can also be normal to an interface between the outer metal sheets and the inner wooden board. When subjected to shear force, the shear capacity is mostly provided by the metal sheet, and the wooden board itself provide very little shear capacity if any at all.
The composite laminated web only accounts for shear force support. In one embodiment, the wooden web 110C is sandwiched by the metal web sheets 120C, and provide a one-way lateral interaction. The interaction can be normal to an interface between the metal sheet 120C and the wooden web 110C. More specifically, the wooden web 110C provides lateral support to the metal sheet and prevent it from pre-mature lateral buckling, so that the metal sheet can develop the full tensile potential of the metal material. The shear capacity is mostly provided by the metal sheet, and the wooden web 110C primarily help to increase the shear capacity of the metal sheets, but the wooden web 110C itself provides very little shear capacity if any at all. In another embodiment, the composite action of the laminated web can increase the capacity of the dowel connection 120D significantly. The presence of wooden web 110C can prevent pre-mature tear-off failure of the metal sheets, and the confinement effect of metal sheets that sandwich the wooden web 110C can significantly increase local bearing capacity of wooden web 110C, so that a much higher shear force can be reliably transferred between the web and flange through the connectors 120D.
In one embodiment, localized composite action at the connection between the laminated web and confined flange can increase the connection capacity significantly. This composite action is similar to the two-way lateral interaction of the flange, but at a localized region around each metal connector. In this case, the confinement effect is originated from the pre-compression of the metal connector, not the metal jacket. For example, tightening of a nut to a pre-compression when the connector is a bolt.
Bolts 120D can be used not only to hold the wrapping, but also to connect the top and bottom flanges to the web. The bolts can comprise a steel through-bolt, a rivet, a screw, a nail, or any other appropriate connector. As shown, one configuration of bolts 120D run in substantially equal increments from one end of the web to the other along both edges. An individual bolt 120D penetrates an entire width of the flanges. More particularly, the bolt 120D penetrates the wooden top flange 110A and the wooden web 110C as well as six layers of metal jackets including: two metal jackets on the outer surfaces of the wooden top flange 110A (i.e., 120A), two metal jackets on the inner side walls of the slotted channel (i.e., 120A) and two metal jackets on outer surfaces of the web (i.e., 120C). The metal jackets 120, in some embodiments, include pre-drilled holes corresponding to pre-configured placement of bolts 120D.
The metal jackets 120C for the web can further include a pattern of pre-punched teeth. Any pattern variation of teeth are possible. As shown, the teeth are evenly spaced horizontally and vertically in a crisscross pattern. The teeth bind to the wood.
At step 410, a confined top flange is provided. The confined top flange can comprise a metal jacket wrapped around an outer perimeter of a wooden core, and along the two inner side walls of a rectangular channel slotted along the wooden core. The metal jacket can be pre-stressed to confine the wooden core. The pre-stress generates a two-way lateral interactions that, in some embodiments, is normal to an interface between the metal jacket and the wooden core. The two-way later interaction allows the member to provide an amount of support surpassing a sum of amount of support provided by the metal jacket and the wooden core when being used separately.
At step 420, a confined bottom flange is provided. In an embodiment, the confined bottom flange is substantially a mirror image of the confined top flange.
At step 430, a laminated web is provided. The laminated web can have a top edge portion inserted into the slotted channel within the confined top flange and a bottom edge portion inserted into the slotted channel within the confined bottom flange. Then, the laminated web is locked to both top and bottom flanges using metal connectors. The connectors can penetrate an entire width of the top and bottom flanges in the middle-depth of the slotted channel along the length of the member.
In summary, the overall load carrying capacity of the composite I-beam is significantly increased through a list of composite actions occurring in the individual components and their connections. Specifically, (1) the compression capacity of the flanges is increased through the two-way lateral interaction; (2) the tension capacity of the flanges is increased because metal has very high tensile capacity by nature; (3) shear capacity of the web is increased through the one-way lateral interaction; and (4) the shear capacity of the connection is also increased through localized composite action similar to the two-way lateral interaction. The end result is a light weight composite I-beam that has very high strength and ductility.
The disclosure herein is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority as a continuation-in-part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/225,518, filed on Sep. 5, 2011, entitled COMPOSITE GUARDRAIL POSTS AND COMPOSITE FLOOR I-JOIST, by WeiHong Yang, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/804,601, entitled STEEL-WOOD COMPOSITE STRUCTURE WITH METAL JACKET WOOD STUDS AND RODS, by WeiHong Yang, the contents of each being hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
96793 | Gatling | Nov 1869 | A |
1368594 | Aatila | Feb 1921 | A |
1453996 | Riddle | May 1923 | A |
1615815 | Birdsey | Jan 1927 | A |
2039398 | Dye | May 1936 | A |
2099470 | Coddington | Nov 1937 | A |
2125692 | Ragsdale et al. | Aug 1938 | A |
2126622 | Davis | Aug 1938 | A |
2167835 | Greulich | Aug 1939 | A |
2167836 | Greulich | Aug 1939 | A |
2187280 | Olson | Jan 1940 | A |
2200159 | Davis | May 1940 | A |
2387432 | Du Laney | Oct 1945 | A |
2918150 | Blum | Dec 1959 | A |
3294608 | Peterson | Dec 1966 | A |
3349537 | Hopfeld | Oct 1967 | A |
3385015 | Hadley | May 1968 | A |
3531901 | Will, Jr. et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3531903 | Swanson | Oct 1970 | A |
3605360 | Lindal | Sep 1971 | A |
3728837 | Kiefer, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
3866884 | Heil et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3913290 | Billing et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4001993 | Daniels | Jan 1977 | A |
4047354 | Sutherland | Sep 1977 | A |
4098109 | Cailloux | Jul 1978 | A |
4281497 | Luotenen et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4335555 | Southerland et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4430373 | Hammarberg | Feb 1984 | A |
4446668 | Christ-Janer | May 1984 | A |
4501102 | Knowles | Feb 1985 | A |
4586550 | Kitipornchai | May 1986 | A |
4615163 | Curtis et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4738071 | Ezard | Apr 1988 | A |
4974387 | Dufour | Dec 1990 | A |
5308675 | Crane et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323584 | Scarlett | Jun 1994 | A |
5497595 | Kalinin | Mar 1996 | A |
5503493 | Kato et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511355 | Dingler | Apr 1996 | A |
5533309 | Rivin | Jul 1996 | A |
5556565 | Kirkwood et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577353 | Simpson | Nov 1996 | A |
5580648 | Castle et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5617685 | Meier et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5617697 | Erwin | Apr 1997 | A |
5688426 | Kirkwood et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5713169 | Meier et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5809735 | LeBlanc | Sep 1998 | A |
5832691 | Callahan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852908 | Nankin | Dec 1998 | A |
5875604 | Rudd | Mar 1999 | A |
5875605 | Rudd | Mar 1999 | A |
5899239 | Coulis | May 1999 | A |
5974760 | Tingley | Nov 1999 | A |
6050047 | Covelli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061995 | Menchetti et al. | May 2000 | A |
6105321 | KarisAllen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134859 | Rudd | Oct 2000 | A |
6167675 | LeBlanc | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173550 | Tingley | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6250042 | Rudd | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260328 | Fowler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6332301 | Goldzak | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343453 | Wright | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6412247 | Menchetti et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6412248 | Rudd | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457292 | Vrana | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460310 | Ford et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505454 | Dingler | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516583 | Houghton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516584 | Rudd | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519911 | Sawada | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6561736 | Doleshal | May 2003 | B1 |
6594964 | Charland | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6715257 | Kent et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729607 | Alberson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735919 | diGirolamo et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6749709 | Krishnawswamy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6886296 | John et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895723 | Knokey et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902150 | Alberson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6938392 | Fouad et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6941718 | diGirolamo et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6986205 | Vrana | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993883 | Belanger | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7168220 | Owoc | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213379 | Carlson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7299596 | Hildreth | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310920 | Hovey, Jr. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7464512 | Perina | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7543369 | Burkett | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7818945 | Gregg et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7882679 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7930866 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8065848 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8161712 | Mackenzie | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166721 | diGirolamo et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8225580 | Peneder | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8266856 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8322037 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8329272 | Cesternino | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8387333 | Brekke | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8438808 | Carlson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8468774 | Garry | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8511043 | Fyfe | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8555601 | Brunner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8621797 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8650820 | Bocquet et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010048101 | Bligh et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020024043 | Albritton | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026762 | Charland | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073641 | Menchetti et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088967 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112428 | Dingler | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144484 | Vrana | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158241 | Ochoa | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166306 | Wilson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030194931 | Crigler | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040040253 | Knokey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040226254 | Charlwood | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226255 | Holloway | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050166530 | Wilson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050252165 | Hubbell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284078 | Marsland | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000152 | Davis | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032182 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070339 | Peneder | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060070340 | Fanucci et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060156682 | McAndrew et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060191235 | Peek et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070119108 | Downard | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131918 | James | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137137 | Peek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151198 | Ou | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175126 | Tonyan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070175583 | Mosallam | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193199 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193212 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070256389 | Davis | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080159807 | Andrews | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178551 | Porter | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080236058 | Antonie | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282633 | Buckhold | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295453 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080302037 | Brown et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013640 | Caroussos | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090075031 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090293405 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100018143 | Woerner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100047489 | Cesternino | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100139181 | Cortina-Cordero et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100207087 | James | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110005145 | Contasti | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110056156 | Tonyan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113725 | Garry | May 2011 | A1 |
20110155315 | Von Pinnon | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167759 | Cesternino | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179647 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110219726 | Brunner | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110250417 | Hubbell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252743 | Yang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120011805 | Yang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120141706 | Bocquet et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120222382 | Brekke | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120298943 | Yang | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130025222 | Mueller | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130055677 | Hayden et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130133278 | Kim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130239512 | Yang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130340384 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130340385 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140083046 | Yang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096476 | Kim et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140182234 | Yang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140182235 | Yang | Jul 2014 | A9 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1840836 | Oct 2006 | CN |
115769 | Aug 1984 | EP |
284494 | Sep 1988 | EP |
2963819 | Feb 2012 | FR |
11200557 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2003343037 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2007146617 | Jun 2007 | JP |
WO 2011115713 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of JP 2007-146617 A retrieval from the JPO on Aug. 20, 2013, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130160398 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12804601 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13225518 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13225518 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13772338 | US |