(1) Field of the Invention
The object of the present invention is an L-shaped fitting obtained after molding a composite material, as well as the method for the production thereof and the mold for implementing said method.
(2) Description of the Prior Art
Such a fitting 1 is aimed, as shown in
These fittings 1 are subjected to tensile and compression forces, and they must therefore meet strict specifications; however, because they are made out of composite material, these fittings are subjected, during their stress, to bending deformations, which generate a delamination of the fibers.
Such fittings are described in GB 2 444 645, one made out of metal and the other one made out of composite material. These two fittings essentially differ in that the one made out of composite material has walls provided with extra thicknesses aimed at reinforcing the structure, so as to try to cope with the drawbacks related to the selection of material.
The solution consisting in making the walls thicker permits to increase only slightly the strength of the structure, while exhibiting other drawbacks such as an increase in size and weight of the fitting.
The present invention is aimed at providing an L-shaped fitting obtained after molding of a composite material the new design of which permits not only to meet the above-mentioned specifications, but also to cope with the drawbacks of deterioration when it is stressed in traction or compression, and without exhibiting the drawbacks related to the addition of material.
The L-shaped fitting obtained after molding a composite material, according to the invention, comprises two portions forming between them an angle, having holes formed therein for permitting to make two parts integral through fixing means, and at right angles by means of side reinforcements, and it is essentially characterized in that at least one of said two portions has, on the inner side of the fitting, a concave curved profile, and in that the hole or holes, provided for in the portion or portions having on the inner side a concave curved profile, are each made according to an axis radial to the curvature.
According to an additional feature of the inventive L-shaped fitting, the area for connecting the two portions has, on the inner side, a concave curved profile.
According to another additional feature of the inventive L-shaped fitting, the side reinforcements have a concave bent profile on the inner side.
According to another additional feature of the inventive L-shaped fitting, at least one of the portions has a flat coupling outer face.
This feature namely permits to increase the compression strength, in particular, but not restrictively, when the direction of the compression force is substantially constant and perpendicular to the flat coupling face.
According to another additional feature of the inventive L-shaped fitting, the flat coupling outer face of one of the portions consists of the outer face of an element molded on said externally convex portion.
The wall of the fitting at the level of the area with curved profile permits to transmit the forces into the composite material, while avoiding inter-laminar shearing and traction.
It should be noted that the interfaces at the level of the hole or holes provided for in an area with a spherical or cylindrical profile, namely when the coupling faces are not flat, are made through spherical or cylindrical bearing elements, such as washers with an adapted shape.
The method for producing the inventive L-shaped fitting obtained after molding of a composite material consists in performing the following successive steps:
The mold permitting the implementation of the method for producing the inventive L-shaped fitting is essentially characterized in that it comprises a portion comprising a hollow cavity reproducing the outer shape of said L-shaped fitting, a second portion or core formed of the association of several elements, designed capable of sliding against each other through oblique surfaces, at least one of said elements forming a wedge so as to permit, during its insertion, to deform said core so that it has externally the inner shape of said L-shaped fitting.
The advantages and features of the inventive fitting will become clear from the following description, which refers to the attached drawing, which represents a non-restrictive embodiment of same.
In the attached drawing:
In
Though the portion 20 is flat, the portion 21 has, in turn, a curved profile, which creates two deformations 25 in the form of a spherical cap, which is concave on the inner side and convex on the outer side, and at the pole of each one of which is drilled a hole 23 with an axis radial to the deformations 25 permitting the passing-through of a fixing means, not shown, for example the screw of a bolt.
It should be noted that the selection of the location of the holes 23 depends on the use of the fitting 2 and especially on the directions of the forces it has to withstand, since the location of a hole 23 is characterized by an axis. In this case, for the fitting 2 shown, the selection of the poles is a particular case.
It should be noted in addition that it is advantageously possible for the axes of the holes 23 not to be parallel.
Furthermore, the side reinforcing portions 24 also have an internally concave and externally convex curved profile.
It should be noted that the area or transition area 26 for connecting the two portions 20 and 21 to each other has an internally concave and externally convex curved profile through which occurs the transmission of the forces from one portion onto the other one.
In order to measure the advantages of the fitting 2 with respect to a fitting 1 made out of composite material and presently used, they have been subjected to comparison tests, which will now be described.
It should be noted first of all that the fittings 1 and 2 used during these tests have been molded with fabrics from one and the same badge and using the same number of plies for the same thickness and with the same method, polymerized according to the same thermal cycle. While increasing successive pressures are applied during the tests, in order to visualize the state of the fitting at each level of pressure.
The first tests consist in examining the behavior of the fittings 1 and 2 during tensile forces.
In
It should be noted that the offset of the starting point of each curve corresponds to the taking up of the backlash of the traction machine after each release, and that the curves of the first five rises in pressure are not reproduced.
The first cracks, referred to as first damages, are audible during the 6th rise in pressure, starting from about 5400 N, without visual degradation of the fitting. From that pressure on, the fitting will <<crunch>> nearly continuously, which corresponds to the breaking of the fibers. For the following tractions, the cracking always restarts only from the preceding level of pressure. One observes on the various curves a change in slope, which corresponds to a decrease in rigidity, resulting from the breaking of the fibers. Starting from about 9000 N, the cracks intensify, however without showing visual breaking, delamination or irreversible deformation.
At about 10500 N, the fitting largely deforms, but this deformation is however reversible. At 11500 N, one observes the same deformation, however this time it is irreversible, while at 11600 N breaking occurs.
In
The first cracking occurs at about 15500 N, without showing any damage. Starting from this pressure, the fitting 2 behaves in the same way as the fitting 1, restarting of the cracking from the preceding level of pressure, and reduction of the rigidity.
The first visible defect appears at about 19900N, this is a delamination, which is visible only under pressure, and visually disappears when the force is released, then, at 18500N the fitting breaks.
In
On each fitting are applied increasing successive pressures, in order to visualize the state of the fitting at each level of pressure. The offset of the starting point of each curve corresponds to the taking up of the backlash of the traction machine after each release.
The first cracks appear at about 11400 N, they continue, without visible consequences, until 13500 N, then at 13700 N collapsing occurs.
In
The first cracks appear at about 12500 N, without showing any damage. Starting from this pressure, the cracks restart from the maximum pressure of the preceding test. No visible damage is observed until the fifth test, or at about 13800 N an important delamination occurs, the following test confirming that the fitting is destroyed.
The following table summarizes the results obtained:
One can thus observe that the fitting 2 according to the invention has much higher tensile strength characteristics than a fitting 1, but that the crushing strength characteristics are identical.
It should be noted that in the studied cases the fitting 2 has a smaller mass than the fitting 1, so that it can be considered that at the same weight, by making the wall thicker, the fitting 2 can exhibit an eventually proportional increase of its tensile strength characteristics, both the tensile and the compression strength.
When referring now to
The portion 21 maintains its concavity on the inner side, as well as the area 26 for connecting the two portions 20 and 21. By contrast, the compression surface is flat, which avoids the use of elements with a spherical or cylindrical bearing face, such as washers with an adapted shape, for creating the interface on the outer side.
From the production point of view, the heel 27 is molded at high pressure onto the portion 21 of the fitting 2, after the latter has been produced. Thus, the fitting 2 maintains the same architecture, the heel 27 forming an interface.
Such a fitting 2 provided with a heel 27 has been tested under the same conditions as the fittings 1 and 2 without a heel. The tensile tests provided the same results as those performed on a fitting 2 without a heel. The results of the crushing tests are given in the graphic of
The first cracks are perceived at about 33000 N at the fifth test, while breaking occurs at 35000 N. The following table summarizes the results obtained:
One can thus observe the superiority of the performances of fitting 2 with a heel 27 according to the invention, though it has, in this case, a smaller mass than the tested fitting 1.
When referring now to
The mold 3 includes, on the one hand, a portion 30 in which is provided for a hollow cavity 31 corresponding to the outer shape of the part to be molded and, on the other hand, a unit 32 of independent parts 33, movable with respect to each other, designed capable of sliding against each other through oblique surfaces 34, and which are assembled in a determined position permitting the unit 32 to reproduce the exact inner shape of the part to be molded, while some of these parts 33, which have a wedge shape, can, through the oblique surfaces, be pushed towards the interior of the unit 32, so as to permit a contraction of the unit 32.
It is obvious that during its use, the hollow cavity 31 is provided with a layer of pre-impregnated fibers in the form of fabrics or mats, then the unit 32, in contracted form, is inserted into the hollow cavity 31, finally the wedge-shaped elements 33 are pushed back towards the outside by means of a cam 35 so that the unit 32 adopts its expanded shape and thus presses the layer 5 of composite material.
It should be noted that this molding method and the mold permitting its implementation are not exclusively aimed at producing a fitting 2, but can perfectly be applied to the production of other objects.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 59056 | Dec 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2009/052599 | 12/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 6/23/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/072952 | 7/1/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
491091 | Drake | Feb 1893 | A |
1916435 | Ott et al. | Jul 1933 | A |
3981474 | Szilagyi | Sep 1976 | A |
4067168 | Thurner | Jan 1978 | A |
4273477 | Murphy | Jun 1981 | A |
4593870 | Cronkhite et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4709897 | Mooney | Dec 1987 | A |
4854533 | Sainato | Aug 1989 | A |
4998304 | Sauter et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5323917 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
7014383 | Schmid et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7226025 | Sato et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226027 | Feeley | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7523906 | Bennett | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8044988 | Peters et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8376275 | Bolukbasi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8540201 | Gadd et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020070322 | Zambelli et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030178326 | Belyakov et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178540 | Ledingham | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20060260259 | Morse | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070221803 | Jouett et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245677 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090173036 | Hand | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193750 | Klima | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100031601 | Lin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120247059 | Daudet et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 34 002 | Apr 1994 | DE |
2 717 735 | Sep 1995 | FR |
2 44 645 | Jun 2008 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110272536 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |