The present application is national phase of PCT/GB2008/050657 filed Aug. 4, 2008, and claims priority from British Application Number 0715303.4 filed Aug. 8, 2007, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a composite laminate structure, and a method for indicating impact damage in such a structure. In particular, although not exclusively, the structure may form part of an aircraft component.
Many aircraft components are made from composite laminate materials. For example, a stringer in an aircraft wing, stiffeners and spar structures, may all be in the form of composite laminate structures. While the structures may be strong when loaded in the way in which they have been designed to be loaded, they may be vulnerable to impact damage, which may result in delamination occurring. Delamination may result in the structure weakening and eventually failing. Particularly vulnerable are the edges of composite laminate structures (at which the layers of the composite laminate structure terminate) where an impact occurs, particularly if the impact is end-on (i.e. when the impact is in a direction perpendicular to the edge and parallel to the plane of the laminates that make up the structure).
If an impact has a significant component of force in the end-on direction the impact may be capable of damaging the bonding between the laminate's layers comprising the composite laminate structure and causing, or adding to the effect of, delamination. Such impacts may be as a result of workmen dropping tools whilst working on the structure, during maintenance for example when the end surfaces of the composite laminate structures are exposed in a way they are usually not. A further way in which the composite laminate structures may be damaged is as a result of wear over time, such wear for example resulting from workmen sitting, or standing, on the structure or contacting the structure directly or by means of tools, or other equipment. It is for example common for a workman to rest tools or toolboxes on the end surface of such structures while working on the aircraft. The edge of a composite laminate structure is typically exposed, at least during maintenance, to direct wear and direct impacts as described above. Similar impact threat exists during the manufacturing and assembly of the composite parts.
When designing an aircraft component, factors that affect the strength and other mechanical properties of composite laminate structures of the aircraft, such as those factors described above, are taken into account. Thus, factors such as those described above typically mean that the composite laminate structures need to be provided with extra strength, resulting in an increase in size and weight.
One known approach to strengthening the edge of a laminar composite is to apply an edge protector—for example as described in US2006/0234007. Another solution is to form the composite laminate with a roll-form edge—that is, an edge formed by a folded layer. However a problem with these conventional methods is that they may not provide sufficient visual evidence of an impact. Such visual evidence may be a requirement of the structure.
A first aspect of the invention provides a structure comprising a composite laminate having an edge; and an impact indicator which is carried by the edge and comprises a resin which fractures upon impact.
A second aspect of the invention provides a method of indicating impact damage in such a structure, the method comprising fracturing the impact indicator.
The fracture provides permanent visible evidence of impact damage, for instance by cracking or by one or more pieces breaking off from the impact indicator. As well as providing such visible evidence of impact damage, the impact indicator may also provide an element of impact protection by absorbing part of the impact energy.
Typically the impact indicator comprises a resin which is more brittle and less strong than the material forming the composite laminate. For instance the material forming the composite laminate may be reinforced, and the resin forming the impact indicator may be un-reinforced.
Typically the composite laminate comprises a thermosetting material such as an epoxy resin. The material forming the impact indicator may be formed from the same thermosetting resin, or from a resin which cures at a similar or lower temperature.
The impact indicator may be limited in length, or may comprises a strip which runs along at least the majority of the length of the edge.
In certain embodiments of the invention, a plurality of layers of the composite laminate terminate at the edge. Alternatively the edge may be a roll-form edge formed by a folded layer.
The impact indicator may be adhered to the edge by co-curing, co-bonding, or secondary bonding. In the case where the impact indicator is adhered to the edge by co-curing, the impact indicator may be formed integrally with the composite laminate (for instance by forming the composite laminate with a resin-rich edge).
In one example the impact indicator is applied to the edge by extruding resin from a nozzle, and then co-bonding the extruded material to the edge by curing it.
In another example the impact indicator is applied by providing a bead of thermosetting resin in a female mould; inserting the edge of the composite laminate into the female mould; and heating the bead and the composite laminate so that the composite laminate cures and the bead is co-cured to the edge.
In another example the composite laminate comprises a reinforcement phase and a matrix resin phase, and the impact indicator is formed by inserting the edge of the composite laminate into a female mould; providing a gap between the edge and the female mould; and heating the composite laminate so that the matrix resin phase flows into the gap and forms the impact indicator.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A stringer 1 shown in
The charge 5a is then deformed over the mould tool as shown in
The direction of the length of the stringer 1 is defined as 0 degrees, and the direction of the height of the stringer is defined as 90 degrees. The lay-up of the stringer is represented by a notation representing the percentage of the fibres in the stringer that are oriented in the directions 0 degrees/±45 degrees/90 degrees. A typical stringer lay-up is 60/30/10. Therefore, 60 percent of the fibres are oriented in the 0 degree direction, 30 percent in the ±45 degree directions and 10 percent in the 90 degree direction.
The stringer includes an exposed top edge 8 which is machined and sealed (after curing) by the process shown in
A shaped machine cutter 10 moves along the edge 8, removing material to form a groove 11 shown in
Note that these processes are performed inline so that the bead 13 is applied at the same time that the edge 8 is machined.
The resin is then cured to co-bond the bead to the edge 8, forming an impact indicator 9 shown in
Note that the machining step may be omitted so that the top edge of the stringer is flat as shown at 8a in
In the cases of
A roll-form stringer is shown in
In an alternative manufacturing process shown in
In a further alternative manufacturing process shown in
The impact indicators described above are formed from a material which fractures upon impact, resulting in one or more cracks and/or one or more pieces breaking off. EA9394 epoxy resin has been found to provide the necessary fracture properties, but other materials may be envisaged. For instance the resin may cure at room temperature so that the bead does not have to be heated in order to cure it.
Note that the impact indicators are formed from a resin which is more brittle and less strong than the material forming the composite laminate. For example un-reinforced EA9394 resin is more brittle and less strong than the carbon-fibre reinforced prepregs which form the composite laminate. Also, the impact indicators each have a curved convex outer surface, and a thickness which varies across the width of the edge. This has a number of benefits:
Although the invention has been described above with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that various changes or modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0715303 | Aug 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/050657 | 8/4/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/4/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/019511 | 2/12/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2712507 | Green | Jul 1955 | A |
3652225 | Coffin et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3700534 | Cook | Oct 1972 | A |
3738857 | Brockett et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3803485 | Crites et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3855044 | Riel | Dec 1974 | A |
3896758 | Di Battista | Jul 1975 | A |
3993828 | McCorsley, III | Nov 1976 | A |
4324682 | Weston et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4606961 | Munsen et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4780262 | VonVolkli | Oct 1988 | A |
4789594 | Stawski | Dec 1988 | A |
4855339 | Saito et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4917938 | Mohan | Apr 1990 | A |
4923203 | Trimble | May 1990 | A |
4935277 | Le Balc'h | Jun 1990 | A |
4958853 | Doty | Sep 1990 | A |
5037122 | Beckerer, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5242830 | Argy et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5316834 | Matsuda et al. | May 1994 | A |
5464902 | Recker | Nov 1995 | A |
5534289 | Bilder et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5806796 | Healey | Sep 1998 | A |
5905260 | Sage et al. | May 1999 | A |
6479124 | Porte et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524646 | Kocsis et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6609865 | Daigneault | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6666941 | Nakamura | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6710328 | Mastro et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6964723 | Lindsay et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7237751 | Anning | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7341777 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7546864 | Kaye | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7647809 | Cooney | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7652075 | Lang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7799842 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7866605 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7913538 | Brassier et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7942032 | Walker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7942368 | Lloyd | May 2011 | B2 |
7959753 | Nunez Delgado et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8059008 | Marincak | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092315 | Swartz et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8276846 | Lloyd | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8348621 | Lafont | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366045 | Goncalves De Oliveira | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8485102 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8689644 | Dubost | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8691383 | Georgeson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8722751 | Scherble | May 2014 | B2 |
9017511 | Cantrell | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20020000128 | Williams | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030075953 | Hirota et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050183818 | Zenkner et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050281999 | Hofmann et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060186260 | Magnuson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060226577 | Lin | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234007 | Durand et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070197383 | Koene et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080087768 | Lloyd | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080277596 | Oxley | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080308669 | Lloyd | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090041972 | Rodman | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090095164 | Celeste | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090304905 | Graham et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100264274 | Bradley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110008587 | Ruskin | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110115115 | Winter | May 2011 | A1 |
20110180959 | Donnelly et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130108828 | Cantrell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130164471 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140224043 | Tighe | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150181340 | Noda | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150252182 | Wang | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3723450 | Jan 1989 | DE |
19931981 | Dec 1999 | DE |
2107213 | Apr 1983 | GB |
2194062 | Feb 1988 | GB |
1112617 | May 1989 | JP |
2001-31781 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001031781 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2005082470 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006105290 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
GB Search Report for GB0715303.4 dated Dec. 19, 2007. |
ISR and Written Opinion for PCT/GB2008/050657 mailed Nov. 6, 2008. |
Decision for rejection issued in Chinese application No. 200880102444.9 dated Feb. 8, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action with English translation dated May 17, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110220006 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |