Composite masonry block

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6616382
  • Patent Number
    6,616,382
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 17, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 9, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
The present invention includes block molds and manufacturing processes as well as a composite masonry block comprising a block body having an irregular trapezoidal shape and comprising a front surface and a back surface, an upper surface and a lower surface, and first and second sidewalls. Both the first and second sidewalls have a first and second part, the sidewall first part extends from the block front surface towards the block back surface at an angle of no greater than ninety degrees in relationship to the block front surface, the sidewall second part surfaces adjoins and lies between the sidewall first parts and the block back surface. The block also has a flange extending from the block back surface past the height of the block. Also disclosed are landscaping structures such as a retaining wall comprising a plurality of the composite masonry blocks of the present invention.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to masonry blocks which may be used in the construction of landscaping elements. More specifically, the present invention relates to masonry block manufacturing processes and the resulting high strength masonry blocks which may be used to construct structures such as retaining walls of variable patterns.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Soil retention, protection of natural and artificial structures, and increased land use are only a few reasons which motivate the use of landscape structures. For example, soil is often preserved on a hillside by maintaining the foliage across that plane. Root systems from trees, shrubs, grass, and other naturally occurring plant life work to hold the soil in place against the forces of wind and water. However, when reliance on natural mechanisms is not possible or practical man often resorts to the use of artificial mechanisms such as retaining walls.




In constructing retaining walls many different materials may be used depending upon the given application. If a retaining wall is intended to be used to support the construction of an interstate roadway, steel or a concrete and steel retaining wall may be appropriate. However, if the retaining wall is intended to landscape and conserve soil around a residential or commercial structure a material may be used which compliments the architectural style of the structure such as wood timbers or concrete block.




Of all these materials concrete block has received wide and popular acceptance for use in the construction of retaining walls and the like. Blocks used for these purposes include those disclosed by Risi et al, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,490,075 and Des. 280,024 and Forsberg, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,802,320 and Des. 296,007 among others. Blocks have also been patterned and weighted so that they may be used to construct a wall which will stabilize the landscape by the shear weight of the blocks. These systems are often designed to “setback” at an angle to counter the pressure of the soil behind the wall. Setback is generally considered the distance which one course of a wall extends beyond the front of the next highest course of the same wall. Given blocks of the same proportion, setback may also be regarded as the distance which the back surface of a higher course of blocks extends backwards in relation to the back surface of the lower wall courses. In vertical structures such as retaining walls, stability is dependent upon the setback between courses and the weight of the blocks.




For example, Schmitt, U.S. Pat. No. 2,313,363 discloses a retaining wall block having a tongue or lip which secures the block in place and provides a certain amount of setback from one course to the next. The thickness of the Schmitt tongue or lip at the plane of the lower surface of the block determines the setback of the blocks. However, smaller blocks have to be made with smaller tongues or flanges in order to avoid compromising the structural integrity of the wall with excessive setback. Manufacturing smaller blocks having smaller tongues using conventional techniques results in a block tongue or lip having inadequate structural integrity. Concurrently, reducing the size of the tongue or flange with prior processes may weaken and compromise this element of the block, the course, or even the entire wall.




Previously, block molds were used which required that the block elements such as a flange be formed from block mix or fill which was forced through the cavity of the mold into certain patterned voids within the press stamp or mold. The patterned voids ultimately become the external features of the block body. These processes relied on the even flow of a highly viscous and abrasive fill throughout the mold, while also not allowing for under-filling of the mold, air pockets in the fill or the mold, or any other inaccuracies which often occur in block processing.




The result was often that a block was produced having a well compressed, strong block body having weak exterior features. Any features formed on the block were substantially weaker due to the lack of uniform pressure applied to all elements of the block during formation. In turn, weaker exterior features on the outside of the block such as an interlocking flange could compromise the entire utility of the block if they crumble or otherwise deteriorate due to improper formation.




The current design of pinless, mortarless masonry blocks generally also fails to resolve other problems such as the ability to construct walls which follow the natural contour of the landscape in a radial or serpentine pattern. Previous blocks also have failed to provide a system allowing the use of anchoring mechanisms which may be affixed to the blocks without complex pinning or strapping fixtures. Besides being complex, these pin systems often rely on only one strand or section of a support tether which, if broken, may completely compromise the structural integrity of the wall. Reliance on such complex fixtures often discourages the use of retaining wall systems by the every day homeowner. Commercial landscapers generally avoid complex retaining wall systems as the time and expense involved in constructing these systems is not supportable given the price at which landscaping services are sold.




As can be seen the present state of the art of forming masonry blocks as well as the design and use of these blocks to build structure has definite shortcomings.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention there is provided a composite masonry block comprising a block body having a front surface and a substantially parallel back surface, an upper surface and a lower surface, and first and second sidewall surfaces each comprising a first and second part. The sidewall first part extends from the block front surface towards the block back surface at an angle of no greater than ninety degrees in relationship to the block front surface. The sidewall second part adjoins and lies between the sidewall first part and the block back surface. The block of the present invention also comprises a flange extending from the block back surface past the height of the block.




In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there are provided landscaping structures such as retaining walls comprising a plurality of courses, each of the courses comprising a plurality of the composite masonry blocks of the present invention.




In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention there is provided a masonry block mold, the mold comprising two opposing sides and a front and back wall. The opposing sides adjoin each other through mutual connection with the mold front and back walls. The mold has a central cavity bordered by the mold opposing sides and the mold front and back wall. The mold opposing sides comprise stepped means for holding additional block mix in the mold cavity adjacent the front and back walls.




In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of using the composite masonry block mold of the present invention comprising filling the mold, subjecting the fill to pressure, and ejecting the formed masonry blocks from the mold.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the mortarless retaining wall block in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a top plan view of the mortarless retaining wall block shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a side elevational view of a mortarless retaining wall block shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the mortarless retaining wall block in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a top plan view of the mortarless retaining wall block depicted in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a side elevational view of the mortarless retaining wall block depicted in

FIGS. 4 and 5

.





FIG. 7

is a partially cut away perspective view of a retaining wall having a serpentine pattern constructed with one embodiment of the composite masonry block of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is a partially cut away perspective view of a retaining wall constructed with one embodiment of the composite masonry block of the present invention showing use of the block with anchoring matrices laid into the ground.





FIG. 9

is a cut away view of the wall shown in

FIG. 8

taken along lines


9





9


.





FIG. 10

is a schematic depiction of one embodiment of the method of the present invention.





FIG. 11

is a side elevational view of one embodiment of the masonry block mold in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 12

is a top plan view of the masonry block mold shown in

FIG. 11

in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 13

is an exploded perspective view of one embodiment of the masonry block mold of the present invention showing application of the supporting bars, core forms, and stamp plate.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Accordingly, the present invention provides a composite masonry block, structures resulting from this block, a masonry block mold for use in manufacturing the block of the present invention, and a method of using this mold. The present invention provides a mortarless interlocking masonry block having a high structural integrity which may be used to construct any number of structures having a variety of patterns. Moreover, the block of the present invention is made through a process and mold which facilitates and enhances the formation of a high strength block with an interlocking element which also has a high structural integrity and allows the fabrication of various landscaping structures of high strength.




Composite Masonry Block




Referring to the drawings wherein like numerals represent like parts throughout several views, a composite masonry block


15


is generally shown in

FIGS. 1-3

and


4


-


6


. The first aspect of the present invention is a composite masonry block having an irregular trapezoidal shaped block body


20


.




The block body generally comprises a front surface


22


and a back surface


24


which are substantially parallel to each other. The front


22


and back


24


surfaces are separated by a distance comprising the depth of the block. The block also has an upper surface


26


and a lower surface


28


separated by a distance comprising the height of the block


15


. The lower surface


28


generally has a smaller area proportion than the upper surface


26


, FIG.


3


.




The block also has a first


30


and second


31


sidewall separated by a distance comprising the width of the block,

FIGS. 2 and 5

. The sidewalls adjoin the block upper and lower surfaces. Both sidewalls comprise a first and second part. The sidewall first part extend from the block front surface towards the back surface at an angle of no greater than ninety degrees in relationship to the block front surface. The sidewall second part adjoins and lies between the first part and the block back surface.




The block also has a flange


40


spanning the width of the block back surface


24


and extending from the block back surface


24


past the height of the block,

FIGS. 3 and 6

. Generally, the flange comprises a setback surface


42


and a locking surface


44


. The setback surface


42


extends from the lower edge of the flange


40


in a plane parallel to the block upper


26


and lower


28


surfaces towards the block front surface


22


to adjoin the flange locking surface


44


. The locking surface extends from the plane of the block lower surface


28


and adjoins the setback surface


42


.




The first element of the composite masonry block of the present invention is the body of the block


20


,

FIGS. 1-3

. The block body


20


provides weight and physical structure to the system in which the block is used. Landscaping elements such as retaining walls often must be constructed of units which not only provide a structural impediment to resist the natural flow of soil, but must also provide the shear weight to withstand these forces. Moreover, the body of the block functions to provide the supporting surfaces which may be used to seat an aesthetically pleasing pattern such as that found on the front surface


22


of the block, FIG.


1


. Finally the body of the block of the present invention provides a substrate for holding elements which help form an interlocking matrix with other blocks when used in a structure such as a wall. In particular, the block carries a flange


40


which assists in the interlocking function of the block.




Generally, the block may take any number of shapes in accordance with the present invention. Distinctive of the present invention is the ability to use the block seen in

FIGS. 1-3

and


4


-


6


to construct either straight or serpentine walls. Accordingly, the block of the present invention preferably has an irregular trapezoidal shape having a parallel front


22


and back surfaces


24


, FIG.


2


. The necessarily irregular nature of the trapezoidal block of the present invention comes from the blocks two part sidewalls


30


,


31


, FIG.


2


.




As can be seen, the block body


20


generally has eight surfaces. The front surface


22


generally faces outward from the structure and may either have a plain or a roughened appearance to enhance the blocks aesthetic appeal. In fact, the block front surface


22


may be smooth, rough, planar or nonplanar, single faceted or multi-faceted.




The back surface


24


of the block generally lies parallel to the front surface


22


. The top surface


26


generally lies parallel to the bottom surface


28


. As can be seen,

FIG. 3

, the upper surface has a greater depth across the block than the lower surface


28


. Generally, the difference in depth between the upper surface


26


and the block lower surface


28


is attributable to the position of the flange


40


, extending in part from the lower surface of the block, FIG.


3


.




The block body sidewall surfaces


30


,


31


lie across the width of the block, FIG.


2


. The sidewalls of the block body of the present invention allow for the construction of straight structures or serpentine structures and more particularly outside radius turns. Accordingly, the block sidewalls are preferably of two-part construction. As can be seen in

FIG. 2

, the block sidewall first parts


34


,


38


extend on either side of the block from the block front surface at an angle, alpha, of approximately ninety degrees toward the block back surface, FIG.


2


.




Generally, at about one-fifth to about one-quarter of the depth of the block, the sidewall first part


38


joins the sidewall second part,

FIGS. 2 and 3

. The sidewall A second part


32


,


36


generally continue further towards the back surface


24


of the block body. Preferably, the sidewall second surfaces converge towards each other as these surfaces move towards the back surface of the block. The angle, beta, of the sidewall second preferably ranges in magnitude from about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees in relation to the block back surface, FIG.


2


. This provides structures having a more aesthetically preferable or pleasing appearance by avoiding a “stepped” appearance which results from the adjacent placement of blocks having an extreme sidewall angle.




The two-part sidewalls allow for the construction of aligned, straight walls given the sidewall first part which aligns with adjoining sidewall first parts of blocks in the same wall course, (see


34


,


38


, FIG.


8


). Optionally, the same embodiment of the block of the present invention allows the construction of aligned serpentine structure


45


, FIG.


7


.




Alternatively, the first part of the sidewall surfaces may have an angle, alpha, which is less than ninety degrees,

FIGS. 4-6

. This embodiment of the block of the present invention may more preferably be used in the construction of serpentine structures such as that shown in FIG.


7


. In this instance, the block sidewall first part provides a block with a more aesthetically refined, rounded or multi-faceted front surface


22


, FIG.


4


. The sidewall second part in this embodiment of the block of the present invention also converge along angle, beta, towards the rear surface of the block allowing the construction of a structure similar to that shown in FIG.


7


.




The block of the present invention also comprises a flange


40


,

FIGS. 3 and 6

. The flange


40


assists in providing an effective interlocking mechanism which stabilizes the structures made in accordance with the present invention. Moreover, the block mold and method of molding blocks of the present invention allow the formation of block elements, such as flange


40


, having high structural strength. The processing simultaneously affords the construction of interlocking elements having minimal size. The result of flanges having such minimal size is a structure having minimal setback and maximum stability given the weight and proportions of the blocks used.




The flange


40


may take any number of forms. Preferably, the flange


40


spans the width the blocks back surface


24


and extends from the block back surface beyond the height of the block. Generally, the flange


40


will extend beneath the lower surface of the block so that when stacked the flange


40


of each ascending block will hang over and lock onto the back surface of the block of the adjacent block in the next lowest course, FIG.


9


.




The flange


40


may comprise any number of surfaces to aid in seating and locking the block in place. Preferably, the flange has a setback surface


42


and a locking surface


44


. The setback surface generally adjoins and extends from the lower edge of the flange in a plane parallel to the block upper and lower surfaces. Adjoining the flange setback surface


42


and the block lower surface


28


is the flange locking surface


44


,

FIGS. 3 and 6

.




The width of the setback surface determines the amount that the blocks of each successive course will setback from blocks from the next lower course. Generally, each successive course of blocks should setback far enough to maintain the stability of the soil behind the wall. In turn, flange


40


generally should be large enough to provide a high strength interlocking element, while remaining small enough to retain the stability of the wall. To this end, the width W of the setback surface


42


,

FIGS. 3 and 6

, generally ranges in width from about 1 inch to about 2 inches across its base. This width range provides minimal setback while ensuring the provision of a strong flange.




In its most preferred mode, the block of the present invention is suitable for both commercial and residential use by landscapers as well as homeowners for use in building landscape structures. In this instance, the block generally weighs from about 50 lbs. to about 100 lbs. and more preferably 65 lbs. to 75 lbs. and has a height of about 3 inches to 12 inches, and more preferably 3 inches to 6 inches, a width of about 12 inches to about 18 inches, and more preferably 14 inches to 16 inches, and a length of about 6 inches to about 24 inches and more preferably 14 inches to about 16 inches. These measurements allow the maintenance of the appropriate weight to width ratio of the block, provide a block weighted to allow manual transport by one person, and ensures optimal efficiency in the use of machinery.




Block Structures




The composite masonry block


15


of the present invention may be used to build any number of landscape structures. Examples of the structures which may be constructed with the block of the present invention are seen in

FIGS. 7-9

. As can be seen in

FIG. 7

, the composite masonry block of the,present invention may be used to build a retaining wall


45


using individual courses


47


to construct to any desired height. The blocks may be stacked in an even pattern or an offset pattern depending on the intended application.




Generally, construction of a structure such as a retaining wall


45


may be undertaken by first defining a trench area beneath the plane of the ground


48


in which to deposit the first course


49


of blocks,

FIGS. 7 and 8

. Once defined, the trench is partially refilled and tamped or flattened. The first course


49


of blocks is then laid into the trench, FIG.


8


. The first course of blocks may often comprise blocks which are laid on their back in order to define a pattern or stop at the base of the wall. As can be seen in

FIGS. 7-9

, successive courses of blocks are then stacked on top of preceding courses while backfilling the wall with soil


48


′. As stability is dependent upon weight and minimal setback, the minimal setback provided by the blocks of the present invention assists in further stabilizing even lighter weight blocks. This minimal setback adds to the stability of smaller size blocks by slowing the horizontal movement backward of the wall through the addition of successive courses.




As can be seen in

FIGS. 7 and 8

the blocks of the present invention allow for the production of serpentine or straight walls. The blocks may be placed at an angle in relationship to one another so as to provide a serpentine pattern having convex and concave surfaces, FIG.


7


. Moreover, depending on which embodiment of the block of the present invention is used, various patterns, serpentine or straight, may be produced in any given structure.




One benefit of the blocks of the present invention is their two part sidewall. While the first part of the side wall has a right angle in relationship to the front surface of the block


22


, the second part of the block sidewalls converge or angle towards each other as the sidewall moves towards the back surface


24


of the block. The converging second part of the block sidewalls allows the blocks to be set in a range of angles relative to adjacent blocks of the same course, FIG.


7


.




Moreover, when a straight wall is desired,

FIG. 8

, the blocks of the present invention allow for the placement of the blocks flush against each other. As can be seen in

FIG. 8

, block sidewall first part surfaces


38


and


34


of two adjacent blocks are flush against one another. This allows for the construction of a wall having tighter block placement.




In contrast, if a more highly angled serpentine wall is desired the block depicted in

FIGS. 4-6

may be used. This block comprises sidewall first parts


34


,


38


which have an angle and which may be less than 90°. As can be seen, the sidewalls first part


34


,


38


effectively become the second and third faces along with the block front surface


22


, of a three faceted front of the block. The lack of a 90° sidewall first part shortens the effective length of the block depicted in

FIGS. 4-6

. Thus, in angling the blocks of

FIGS. 4-6

the length of the sidewalls first part


34


,


38


does not become a factor block placement. As a result blocks of the same relative size and weight may be used more efficiently given limited space.




As can be seen in

FIG. 8

, a supporting matrix


43


may be used to anchor the blocks in the earth fill


48


′ behind the wall. One advantage of the block of the present invention is that despite the absence of pins, the distortion created by the block flange


40


anchors the entire width of the matrix


43


when pressed between two adjacent blocks of different courses, as can be seen in FIG.


9


.




In this instance, a wall is constructed again by forming a trench in the earth. The first course


49


of the wall is seated in the trench and will be under the soil once the wall is backfilled. The blocks


15


are placed on a securing mat or matrix


43


which is secured within the bank


48


′ by deadheads


44


. The deadheads


44


serve as an additional stabilizing factor for the wall providing additional strength. The deadheads


44


may be staggered at given intervals over the length of each course and from course to course to provide an overall stability to the entire wall structure.




Block Molding the Blocks




An additional aspect of the present invention is the process for casting or forming the composite masonry blocks of this invention using a masonry block mold. Generally, the process for making this invention includes block molding the composite masonry block by filling a block mold with mix and casting the block by compressing the mix in the mold through the application of pressure to the exposed mix at the open upper end of the block mold. Formation of the block of the present invention is undertaken with a stepped mold to ensure that the pressure applied to the entire block


15


is uniform across the body


20


and flange


40


.




An outline of the process can be seen in the flow chart shown in FIG.


10


. Generally, the processes is initiated by mixing the concrete fill. Any variety of concrete mixtures may be used with this invention depending upon the strength, water absorption, density, and shrinkage among other factors desired for the given concrete block. One mixture which has been found to be preferable includes cementatious materials such as cement or fly ash, water, sand, and gravel or rock. However, other components including plasticizers, water proofing agents, cross-linking agents, dyes, colorants, pigments etc. may be added to the mix in concentrations up to 5 wt-% depending upon the physical characteristics which are desired in the resulting block.




Blocks may be designed around any number of different physical properties in accordance with ASTM Standards depending upon the ultimate application for the block. For example, the fill may comprise from 75 to 95% aggregate being sand and gravel in varying ratios depending upon the physical characteristics which the finished block is intended to exhibit. The fill generally also comprises some type of cementatious materials at a concentration ranging from 4% to 12%. Other constituents may then be added to the fill at various trace levels in order to provide blocks having the intended physical characteristics.




Generally, once determined, the fill constituents may be placed in any number of general mixers including those commonly used by those with skill in the art for mixing cement and concrete. To mix the fill, the aggregate, the sand and rock, is first dumped into the mixer followed by the cement. After one to two and one-half minutes, any plasticizers that will be used are added. Water is then introduced into the fill in pulses over a one to two minute period. The concentration of water in the mix may be monitored electrically by noting the resistance of the mix at various times during the process. While the amount of water may vary from one fill formulation to another fill formulation, it generally ranges from about 1% to about 6%.




Once the fill is mixed, the fill is then loaded into a hopper which transports the fill to the mold


50


within the block machine,

FIGS. 11 and 12

.




The mold


50


generally comprises at least four sides bordering a central cavity. As can be seen in

FIG. 12

, the mold generally has a front wall


58


, a back wall


56


, and a first


52


and second


54


opposing side. The opposing sides (


52


,


54


) are each generally stepped in area


53


having a depressed center length (


52


′,


54


′) and an elevated higher end adjacent the front and back walls, FIG.


11


. The central cavity


55


is bordered by these walls.




Core forms


62


may also be placed in the mold cavity


55


prior to loading the mold with block mix. Generally, the core forms


62


may be supported by bars


60


positioned across opposing first


52


and second


54


sidewalls and adjacent to the stepped regions


53


in each of these sidewalls.




Turning to the specific aspects of the mold, the mold functions to facilitate the formation of the blocks. Accordingly, the mold may comprise any material which will withstand the pressure to be applied to block fill by the head. Preferably, metals such as steel alloys having a Rockwell “C”-scale ranging from about 60-65 provide optimal wear resistance and the preferred rigidity. Generally, metals found useful in the manufacture of the mold of the present invention include high grade carbon steel 41-40 AISI (high nickel content, prehardened steel), carbon steel 40-50 (having added nickel) and the like. A preferred material includes carbon steel having a structural ASTM of A36.




The mold of the present invention may be made by any number of means known to those of skill in the art. Generally, the mold is produced by cutting the stock steel, patterning the cut steel, providing an initial weld to the patterned mold pieces and heat treating the mold. Heat treating generally may take place at temperatures ranging from 1000° F. to 1400° F. for 4 to 10 hours depending on the ability of the steel to withstand processing and not distort. After heat treating, final welds are then applied to the pieces of the mold.




Turning to the individual elements of the mold, the mold walls generally function according to their form by withstanding the pressure created by the press. Further, the walls measure the height and depth of the resulting blocks. Accordingly the mold walls must be made of a thickness which will accommodate the processing parameters of block formation given a specific mold composition. Preferably, the mold walls range in thickness from about 0.25 inch to about 2.0 inches, preferably from about 0.75 inch to 1.5 inches.




Additionally, the mold sidewalls function to ensure that uniform pressure is applied throughout the entire block during formation. Uniform pressure on all block elements is ensured by retaining additional block fill or mix adjacent the mold front


56


and back


58


wall in areas


55


A and


55


B, which will be the area in which the block flange


40


(

FIGS. 3 and 6

) is formed. By retaining mix in areas


55


A and


55


B, the same compression is applied to the mix which becomes the block body and to the mix which becomes the block flange. The application of uniform pressure to the block flange allows the construction of smaller blocks having smaller, stronger flanges. In turn, a smaller flange provides a block which results in a more vertical structure such as a wall having less setback from course to course and, as a result, greater stability over its height.




Generally, the mold sidewalls


52


,


54


may take any form which provides this function. Preferably, the mold sidewalls


52


,


54


are stepped


53


as can be seen in

FIGS. 11 and 12

. Turning to

FIG. 11

, mold sidewall


54


is stepped twice across its length in region


53


to create a depressed central length


54


′ in the sidewall


54


. In

FIG. 11

, the mold


50


is shown during the actual block formation step, with the head


72


compressed onto the block fill in the mold


50


.




The mold may preferably also comprise support bars


60


and core forms


62


. The support bars


60


hold the core forms


62


in place and act as a stop for block fill or mix which is retained in the elevated (or stepped) region of the mold


50


thereby preventing the fill from flowing back into the area bordered by the depressed central lengths


52


′ and


54


′ of sidewalls


52


and


54


. Here again, the support bars may take any shape, size material composition which provides these functions.




As can be seen more clearly in

FIG. 12

, support bar


60


is preferably long enough to span the width of mold


50


resting on opposing sidewalls


52


and


54


. Preferably the support bars


60


are high enough to restrict the flow of fill into the central area of the mold cavity


55


. Complementing this function, the support bars


60


are generally positioned in the depressed central areas


52


′ and


54


′ of the opposing sidewalls immediately adjacent stepped region


53


, FIG.


12


.




As can be seen in outline in

FIG. 11

, the core forms


62


are supported by bars


60


which span the width of the mold


50


resting on the opposing sidewalls


52


,


54


. The head


72


and head stamp


70


(also seen in outline (FIG.


11


)) are patterned to avoid contact with the core forms


62


and support bars


60


.




The core forms have a number of functions. The core forms


62


act to form voids in the resulting composite masonry block. In turn, the core forms lighten the blocks, reduce the amount of fill necessary to make a block and add a handle to the lower surface of the block which assists in transport and placement of the blocks. In concert with these functions the cores may take any number of forms. Preferably, the core forms are approximately three inches square and penetrate from about 60% to about 80% of the blocks height and most preferably about 70% to 80% of the block height. Also preferred, as can be seen in the exploded view provided in

FIG. 13

, the core forms


62


are affixed to the support bar


60


at insert regions


60


A. These insert regions


60


A assist in positioning the cores and during processing, reduce the build up of block mix or fill on the lower edge of the support bar


60


. In turn, maintaining a support bar


60


clean of mix build up maintains the planarity of the lower surface of blocks formed in accordance with the present invention.




In operation, the mold


50


is generally positioned in a block molding machine atop a removable or slidable substrate


80


, FIG.


13


. The support bars


60


and core forms


62


are then placed into the mold


50


. The mold


50


is then loaded with block mix or fill. As configured in

FIG. 12

, the mold


50


is set to form two blocks simultaneously in “siamese” pattern. As will be seen, once formed and cured, the blocks may be split along the edge created by flange


51


generally along axis A.




Prior to compression the upper surface of the mold


50


is scraped or raked with a feed box drawer (not shown) to remove excess fill. Scraping of the mold is preferably undertaken in a side-to-side direction in order to avoid contact with the side bars


60


. Also, removal of the excess fill from the mold by scraping from the side allows for the depressed central lengths


52


′ and


54


′ of the mold and does not disturb the fill at the stepped ends of the mold


50


.




The mold is then subjected to compression directly by head


70


(shown in outline complete in FIG.


11


and in perspective in FIG.


13


). Preferably the head


70


is patterned


74


to avoid the support bars


60


and core forms


62


. Also, as can be seen in

FIG. 13

, the head


70


preferably has an instep


75


which shape complements and results in, the formation of the block flange


40


. Instead of relying on the head to force block fill towards either end of the mold


50


into instep


75


to create a flange, the mold


50


maintains fill in the stepped regions at either end of the mold


50


. The fill in these regions comes into direct contact with instep


75


immediately upon lowering of the head


70


. As a result, the fill in this stepped area is subjected to the same pressure as the fill in other areas of the mold. This results in a flange


40


of the same structural strength as the other elements of the block


15


.




Once the mold has been filled, leveled by means such as a feed-box drawer, and agitated, a compression mechanism such as a head converges on the exposed surface of the fill. The head acts to compress the fill within the mold for a period of time sufficient to form a solid contiguous product. The head


70


, as known to those of skill in the art, is a unit which has a pattern which mirrors the blocks and core forms


62


and is complementary to that of the mold


50


. Generally, the compression time may be anywhere from ½ to 3 seconds and more preferably about 1.5 to about 2 seconds. The compression pressure applied by the head ranges from about 5000 to 8000 psi and preferably is about 7500 psi. Once a compression period is over, the head in combination with an underlying pallet


80


acts to strip the blocks


15


from the mold


50


. At this point in time, the blocks are formed. Any block machine known to those of skill in the art may be used. One machine which has been found useful in the formation of blocks in accordance with the present invention is a Besser V-3/12 block machine.




Prior to compression the mold may be vibrated. Generally, the fill is transported from the mixer to a hopper which then fills the mold


50


. The mold is then agitated for up to two or three seconds, the time necessary to ensure that the fill has uniformly spread throughout the mold. The blocks are then formed by the compressing action of the head.




Once the blocks are formed, they may be cured through any means known to those of skill in the art. Curing mechanisms such as simple air curing, autoclaving, steam curing or mist curing, are all useful methods of curing the block of the present invention. Air curing simply entails placing the blocks in an environment where they will be cured by the open air over time. Autoclaving entails placing the blocks in a pressurized chamber at an elevated temperature for a certain period of time. The pressure in the chamber is then increased by creating a steady mist in the chamber. After curing is complete the pressure is released from the chamber which in turn draws the moisture from the blocks.




Another means for curing blocks is by steam. The chamber temperature is slowly increased over two to three hours and then stabilized during the fourth hour. The steam is gradually shut down and the blocks are held at the eventual temperature, generally around 120-200° F. for two to three hours. The heat is then turned off and the blocks are allowed to cool. In all instances, the blocks are generally allowed to sit for twelve to twenty-four hours before being stacked or stored. Critical to curing operations is a slow increase in temperature. If the temperature is increased too quickly, the blocks may “case-harden.” Case-hardening occurs when the outer shell of the blocks hardens and cures while the inner region of the block remains uncured and moist. While any of these curing mechanisms will work, the preferred curing means is autoclaving.




Once cured, the blocks may be split if they have been cast “siamese” or in pairs. Splitting means which may be used in the method of the present invention include a manual chisel and hammer as well as machines known to those with skill in the art for such purposes. Splitting economizes the production of the blocks of the present invention by allowing the casting of more than one block at any given time. When cast in pairs, the blocks


15


,

FIG. 13

, may be cast to have an inset groove created by flange


51


on their side surfaces between the two blocks. This groove provides a natural weak point or fault which facilitates the splitting action along axis A′. The blocks may be split in a manner which provides a front surface


22


which is smooth or coarse, single-faceted or multi-faceted, as well as planar or curved. Preferably, splitting will be completed by an automatic hydraulic splitter. Once split, the blocks may be cubed and stored.




The above discussion, examples, and embodiments illustrate our current understanding of the invention. However, since many variations of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides wholly in the claims hereafter appended.



Claims
  • 1. A mortarless retaining wall block comprising:a generally planar upper surface which is substantially free of cores and recesses; a lower surface configured to engage the upper surface of an adjacent block of like construction to maintain a generally horizontal, parallel relationship between the upper surfaces of blocks in successive courses of blocks when the blocks are stacked together to form a wall; a front face; a rear face; a pair of side faces joining the front and rear faces and having rearwardly converging portions; and a flange extending below the lower surface of the block to provide a surface suitable for engaging the rear face of a block of like construction in the course below said block to thereby provide a pre-determined set-back to a retaining wall constructed from such blocks; wherein the block is free from cores extending through the block from side face to side face.
  • 2. The block of claim 1 wherein a portion of each of said side faces converges towards the other side face as the side faces extend toward said rear face.
  • 3. The block of claim 1 wherein said side faces have notches that extend from said upper surface to said lower surface.
  • 4. The block of claim 1 wherein the front face of the block is generally vertical.
  • 5. The block of claim 4 wherein the front face of the block is generally planar.
  • 6. The block of claim 4 wherein the front face is non-planar.
  • 7. The block of claim 6 wherein the front face of the block is faceted.
  • 8. The block of claim 7 wherein the front face comprises three facets.
  • 9. The block of claim 1 wherein a line drawn on the upper surface through the points where the rearwardly converging portions begin is substantially parallel to a line drawn through the points where the side faces join the rear face.
  • 10. The block of claim 1 wherein the rear face is generally vertical.
  • 11. The block of claim 1 wherein the depth of the block is the distance between the midpoint of the front face and the midpoint of the rear face, wherein the flange has a rear face which is substantially an extension of the rear face of the block, wherein the engaging surface of the flange intersects the lower surface of the block, wherein the depth of the flange is the distance between the front locking surface and the rear face of the flange, and wherein the ratio of the depth of the block to the depth of the flange is at least about 6:1.
  • 12. The block of claim 11 wherein the rear face of the block includes a substantially planar portion which is parallel to a line drawn through the points where the side faces join the rear face of the block.
  • 13. The block of claim 12 wherein the engaging surface of the flange intersects the lower surface of the block generally along a line that is generally parallel to the substantially planar portion of the rear face of the block.
  • 14. The block of claim 11 wherein each side face further includes a forwardly converging portion that intersects the front face at an angle of less than 90 degrees.
  • 15. The block of claim 12 wherein the rearwardly converging side face portions each intersect the rear face at an angle of less than 90 degrees.
  • 16. The block of claim 1 wherein each of said side faces comprises a first part and a second part, said side face first parts extending from said block front face towards said block rear face and intersecting the front face at an angle of ninety degrees or less, said side face second parts joining their respective side face first parts and said block rear face, each side face second part intersecting the rear face at an angle of less than ninety degrees.
  • 17. The block of claim 16 wherein each of said first parts of said side faces is substantially perpendicular to the front face.
  • 18. A The block of claim 1 wherein the front face has a roughened texture.
  • 19. The block of claim 1 wherein the lower surface has a smaller area for block to block contact than the area of the upper surface.
  • 20. The block of claim 1 wherein said upper surface is completely free of cores and recesses.
  • 21. A mortarless retaining wall block comprising:a) a block body that, i) in top plan view presents a top surface that is substantially free of cores and recesses, and that has a front edge, an opposed rear edge, and opposed first and second side edges, the side edges include portions that converge toward the rear edge and are oriented at oblique angles relative to the rear edge, ii) in side elevation view presents a side surface that is substantially free of cores and having a generally vertical front edge, an opposed, generally vertical rear edge, a generally horizontal top edge, and a generally horizontal bottom edge, wherein no portion of the block body is visible above the top edge or below the bottom edge, and that iii) has a decorative front surface; and b) a flange formed on the block body below the bottom edge of the side surface and in front of the rear edge of the side surface, that has a forward-facing locking surface.
  • 22. The block of claim 21 wherein there are no connector pin openings or other openings in the top surface, and the side surface has no recesses, connector pin openings or other openings.
  • 23. The block of claim 21 wherein the first and second side edges include notches.
  • 24. The block of claim 21 wherein no portion of the block body is visible beyond said front, rear and side edges.
  • 25. The block of claim 21, wherein the front surface is generally vertical.
  • 26. The block of claim 25, wherein the front surface is generally planar.
  • 27. The block of claim 25, wherein the front surface is non-planar.
  • 28. The block of claim 27, wherein the front surface is faceted.
  • 29. The block of claim 28, wherein the front surface comprises three facets.
  • 30. The block of claim 21, wherein a line drawn on the top surface through the points where the converging side edge portions begin is substantially parallel to a line drawn through the points where the side edges join the rear edge of said top surface.
  • 31. The block of claim 21, wherein said forward-facing locking surface is generally parallel to said vertical rear edge of said side surface.
  • 32. The block of claim 21, wherein each side edge of said top surface includes a forwardly converging portion that intersects the front edge of said top surface at an angle of less than 90 degrees.
  • 33. The block of claim 22, wherein the converging side edge portions each intersect the rear edge of said top surface at an angle of less than 90 degrees.
  • 34. A retaining wall comprising a plurality of courses of masonry blocks, each course comprising a plurality of masonry blocks, and the blocks of each said course after the first course of blocks being positioned on the blocks of a next lower course in succession, and each said masonry block comprising:(a) a generally horizontal upper surface; (b) a lower surface; (c) a front face that is generally vertical over a substantial portion of the front face and which is substantially perpendicular to the upper surface at the intersection of the front face and the upper surface; (d) a rear face; (e) a pair of generally vertical side faces joining the front and rear faces; (f) a flange extending below the lower surface of the block to provide a surface suitable for engaging the block with the rear face of an adjacent block in the next lower course to thereby provide a set-back of the course above with respect to the next lower course; and (g) wherein the block is wider at the front face than it is at the rear face; and wherein the wall further comprises a distortable supporting matrix having a portion thereof positioned between the upper surfaces of blocks in the next lower course and the lower surfaces of adjacent blocks in the course above, and having a portion thereof positioned in soil behind the retaining wall, whereby the matrix is distorted by the flanges of blocks in the course above.
  • 35. The retaining wall of claim 34, wherein at least some of the blocks include one or more cores extending vertically through the blocks generally parallel to said side faces.
  • 36. The retaining wall of claim 34 wherein at least some of the masonry blocks are free from cores extending through the blocks from side face to side face.
  • 37. The retaining wall of claim 35 wherein the vertically-extending cores open to the lower surfaces of the blocks, but do not open to the upper surfaces of the blocks.
  • 38. The retaining wall of claim 34 wherein the distortable supporting matrix is in the form of a grid.
  • 39. The retaining wall of claim 34 wherein the side faces each include a first portion that extends rearwardly from the front face and a second portion that extends rearwardly from the first portion, and wherein the first portions do not converge as they extend rearwardly, and wherein the second portions do converge as they extend rearwardly.
  • 40. The retaining wall of claim 36 wherein said side faces have notches that extend from said upper surface to said lower surface.
  • 41. A pre-split concrete unit adapted to be split in a splitting machine to yield at least two concrete blocks, said pre-split concrete unit comprising:a body comprising a pair of integral face-to-face concrete blocks, the body having a top surface, a bottom surface opposed to said top surface, opposed first and second end surfaces joining said top and bottom surfaces and being generally perpendicular to them, and opposed sides joining said top and bottom surfaces and joining said first and second end surfaces, said opposed sides being generally perpendicular to said top and bottom surfaces and said first and second end surfaces; said sides comprise portions that converge as they approach said first and second end surfaces, and each side includes a portion that interconnects said converging portions and that extends generally perpendicular to said end surfaces; and two flanges integrally formed on said body and extending above said top surface, one said flange formed adjacent the first end surface and the other flange formed adjacent the second end surface.
  • 42. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 40, wherein each said flange includes a rear surface that is substantially an extension of the respective said end surface.
  • 43. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 41, wherein each said flange includes a front locking surface that intersects the top surface generally along a line that is generally parallel to the respective said end surface.
  • 44. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 41, wherein said body is symmetrical on each side of an axis that bisects said body and that extends between said sides parallel to said end surfaces.
  • 45. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 44, wherein said blocks are substantially the same size.
  • 46. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 41, wherein the axis bisects said perpendicular portions of said sides.
  • 47. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 41, wherein each said side includes a pair of converging portions that converge towards the other side as the converging portions extend toward said end surfaces.
  • 48. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 41, wherein said perpendicular portions of said sides include notches that extend from said top surface to said bottom surface, and that are intersected by the axis.
  • 49. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 48, wherein said sides further include notches at the junctures between said perpendicular side portions and said converging side portions.
  • 50. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 40, wherein said top surface forms a portion of a bottom surface of a block and said bottom surface forms a portion of a top surface of the same block that results from splitting the pre-split unit.
  • 51. The pre-split concrete unit of claim 40, wherein said top surface is substantially parallel to said bottom surface.
  • 52. A concrete block formed from the pre-split concrete unit according to claim 41, comprising:opposed and generally parallel top and bottom surfaces; a rear face extending between the top and bottom surfaces and generally perpendicular thereto; a generally vertical and generally planar front face extending between the top and bottom surfaces; a pair of side faces joining the front and rear faces and joining the top and bottom surfaces, the side faces being generally perpendicular to the top and bottom surfaces and to the rear face, and the side faces having rearwardly converging portions and portions that extend between the front face and the rearwardly converging portions that are generally perpendicular to the rear face; and a flange extending below the bottom surface.
  • 53. A concrete block formed from the pre-split concrete unit according to claim 41, comprising:opposed and generally parallel top and bottom surfaces; a rear face extending between the top and bottom surfaces and generally perpendicular thereto; a generally vertical front face extending between the top and bottom surfaces, the front face comprising three facets; a pair of side faces joining the front and rear faces and joining the top and bottom surfaces, the side faces being generally perpendicular to the top and bottom surfaces and to the rear face, and the side faces having rearwardly converging portions that extend between the front face and the rear face; and a flange extending below the bottom surface.
Parent Case Info

This application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/665,231, filed Sep. 18, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,197, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/497,250, filed Feb. 3, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,183,168, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/160,916, filed Sep. 25, 1998, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,142,713, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/921,481, filed Sep. 2, 1997, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,827,015, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/675,572, filed Jul. 3, 1996 (now abandoned), which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/469,795, filed Jun. 6, 1995, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,124, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/157,830, filed Nov. 24, 1993 (now abandoned), which is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 07/651,322, filed Feb. 6, 1991, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,294,216, which is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 07/534,831, filed Jun. 7, 1990, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,062,610, which is a Continuation-in-Part application of Ser. No. 07/413,400, filed Sep. 27, 1989 (now abandoned), which is a Continuation-in-Part application of Ser. No. 07/413,050, filed Sep. 27, 1989 (now abandoned), which applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (200)
Number Name Date Kind
126547 Hickcox May 1872 A
228052 Frost May 1880 A
468838 Steiger Feb 1892 A
566924 Morrin Sep 1896 A
810748 Haller et al. Jan 1906 A
831077 Johnson Sep 1906 A
847476 Hodges Mar 1907 A
884354 Bertrand Apr 1908 A
916756 Grant Mar 1909 A
1002161 Lambert Aug 1911 A
1092621 Worner Apr 1914 A
1219127 Marshall Mar 1917 A
1222061 Bartells Apr 1917 A
1248070 Buente Nov 1917 A
1285458 Strunk Nov 1918 A
1287055 Lehman Dec 1918 A
1330884 McDermott Feb 1920 A
1414444 Straight May 1922 A
1419805 Bigler Jun 1922 A
1456498 Binns May 1923 A
1465608 McCoy Aug 1923 A
1472917 Laird Nov 1923 A
1557946 Smith Oct 1925 A
1695997 Evers et al. Dec 1928 A
1727363 Bone Sep 1929 A
1733790 Gilman Oct 1929 A
1751028 Casell et al. Mar 1930 A
1773579 Flath Aug 1930 A
1907053 Flath May 1933 A
1993291 Vermont Mar 1935 A
2011531 Tranchell Aug 1935 A
2034851 Wichmann Mar 1936 A
2094167 Evers Sep 1937 A
2113076 Bruce Apr 1938 A
2121450 Sentrop Jun 1938 A
2149957 Dawson Mar 1939 A
2197960 Alexander Apr 1940 A
2219606 Schoick Oct 1940 A
2235646 Schaffer Mar 1941 A
2313363 Schmitt Mar 1943 A
2371201 Wells Mar 1945 A
2570384 Russell Oct 1951 A
2593606 Price Apr 1952 A
2683916 Kelly Jul 1954 A
2881753 Entz Apr 1959 A
2882689 Huch et al. Apr 1959 A
2892340 Fort Jun 1959 A
2925080 Smith Feb 1960 A
2963828 Belliveau Dec 1960 A
3036407 Dixon May 1962 A
3185432 Hager, Jr. May 1965 A
3204316 Jackson Sep 1965 A
3274742 Paul, Jr. et al. Sep 1966 A
3378885 Dart Apr 1968 A
3386503 Corning et al. Jun 1968 A
3390502 Carroll Jul 1968 A
3392719 Clanton et al. Jul 1968 A
3430404 Muse Mar 1969 A
3488964 Kubo Jan 1970 A
3557505 Kaul Jan 1971 A
3631682 Hilfiker et al. Jan 1972 A
3659077 Olson Apr 1972 A
3667186 Kato Jun 1972 A
3754499 Heisman et al. Aug 1973 A
3783566 Nielson Jan 1974 A
3888060 Haener Jun 1975 A
D237704 Lane Nov 1975 S
3925994 Broms et al. Dec 1975 A
3932098 Huber et al. Jan 1976 A
3936987 Calvin Feb 1976 A
3936989 Hancock Feb 1976 A
3953979 Kurose May 1976 A
3981038 Vidal Sep 1976 A
3995434 Kato et al. Dec 1976 A
4001988 Riefler Jan 1977 A
4016693 Warren Apr 1977 A
4023767 Fontana May 1977 A
4051570 Hilfiker Oct 1977 A
4067166 Sheahan Jan 1978 A
4083190 Pey Apr 1978 A
4098040 Riefler Jul 1978 A
4098865 Repasky Jul 1978 A
4107894 Mullins Aug 1978 A
4110949 Cambiuzzi et al. Sep 1978 A
4114773 Sekiguchi Sep 1978 A
4124961 Habegger Nov 1978 A
4126979 Hancock Nov 1978 A
4132492 Jenkins Jan 1979 A
4145454 Dea et al. Mar 1979 A
4175888 Ijima Nov 1979 A
4186540 Mullins Feb 1980 A
4187069 Mullins Feb 1980 A
4190384 Neumann Feb 1980 A
4193718 Wahrendorf et al. Mar 1980 A
4207718 Schaaf et al. Jun 1980 A
4208850 Collier Jun 1980 A
4214655 Bernham et al. Jul 1980 A
4218206 Mullins Aug 1980 A
4228628 Schlomann Oct 1980 A
4229123 Heinzmann Oct 1980 A
4238105 West Dec 1980 A
4242299 Adams Dec 1980 A
4250863 Gagnon Feb 1981 A
4262463 Hapel Apr 1981 A
4288960 Auras Sep 1981 A
4312606 Sarikelle Jan 1982 A
4314431 Rabassa Feb 1982 A
4319440 Rassias et al. Mar 1982 A
4324505 Hammett Apr 1982 A
4335549 Dean, Jr. Jun 1982 A
4337605 Tudek Jul 1982 A
4372091 Brown et al. Feb 1983 A
4380409 O'Neill Apr 1983 A
4384810 Neumann May 1983 A
4426176 Terada Jan 1984 A
4426815 Brown Jan 1984 A
4449857 Davis May 1984 A
4454699 Strobl Jun 1984 A
4470728 Broadbent Sep 1984 A
4490075 Risi et al. Dec 1984 A
4496266 Ruckstuhl Jan 1985 A
4512685 Hegle Apr 1985 A
D279030 Risi et al. May 1985 S
4524551 Scheiwiller Jun 1985 A
D280024 Risi et al. Aug 1985 S
4565043 Mazzayese Jan 1986 A
4572699 Rinninger Feb 1986 A
D284109 Seal, Jr. Jun 1986 S
4616959 Hilfiker Oct 1986 A
4640071 Haener Feb 1987 A
4651485 Osborne Mar 1987 A
4658541 Haile Apr 1987 A
4659304 Day Apr 1987 A
4660342 Salisbury Apr 1987 A
4661023 Hilfiker Apr 1987 A
4671706 Giardini Jun 1987 A
4684294 O'Neill Aug 1987 A
4698949 Dietrich Oct 1987 A
4711606 Leling et al. Dec 1987 A
4721847 Leverenz Jan 1988 A
4726567 Greenberg Feb 1988 A
4728227 Wilson et al. Mar 1988 A
4738059 Dean, Jr. Apr 1988 A
D295788 Forsberg May 1988 S
D295790 Forsberg May 1988 S
D296007 Forsberg May 1988 S
D296365 Forsberg Jun 1988 S
D297464 Forsberg Aug 1988 S
D297574 Forsberg Sep 1988 S
D297767 Forsberg Sep 1988 S
4770218 Duerr Sep 1988 A
D298463 Forsberg Nov 1988 S
4784821 Leopold Nov 1988 A
D299067 Forsberg Dec 1988 S
D299069 Risi et al. Dec 1988 S
4802320 Forsberg Feb 1989 A
4802836 Whissell Feb 1989 A
D300253 Forsberg Mar 1989 S
D300254 Forsberg Mar 1989 S
4815897 Risi et al. Mar 1989 A
4824293 Brown et al. Apr 1989 A
D301064 Forsberg May 1989 S
4825619 Forsberg May 1989 A
4860505 Bender Aug 1989 A
4884921 Smith Dec 1989 A
4896472 Hunt Jan 1990 A
4896999 Ruckstuhl Jan 1990 A
4909010 Gravier Mar 1990 A
4909717 Pardo Mar 1990 A
4914876 Forsberg Apr 1990 A
4936712 Glickman Jun 1990 A
D311444 Forsberg Oct 1990 S
4964761 Rossi Oct 1990 A
4965979 Larrivee et al. Oct 1990 A
D316904 Forsberg May 1991 S
D317048 Forsberg May 1991 S
D317209 Forsberg May 1991 S
5017049 Sievert May 1991 A
5031376 Bender et al. Jul 1991 A
5044834 Janopaul, Jr. Sep 1991 A
5062610 Woolford et al. Nov 1991 A
5104594 Hillemeier et al. Apr 1992 A
5125815 Kargarzadeh et al. Jun 1992 A
5139721 Castonguay et al. Aug 1992 A
5158132 Guillemot Oct 1992 A
5161918 Hodel Nov 1992 A
5261806 Pleasant Nov 1993 A
5294216 Sievert Mar 1994 A
5589124 Wooldford et al. Dec 1996 A
D380560 Forsberg Jul 1997 S
5827015 Woolford et al. Oct 1998 A
5943827 Okerlund Aug 1999 A
5984589 Ciccarello Nov 1999 A
6079908 Anderson Jun 2000 A
6082057 Sievert Jul 2000 A
6142713 Woolford et al. Nov 2000 A
6168354 Martin et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178704 Sievert Jan 2001 B1
6183168 Woolford et al. Feb 2001 B1
6312197 Woolford et al. Nov 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (97)
Number Date Country
548462 Feb 1980 AU
6747781 Feb 1981 AU
2239783 Jun 1985 AU
5276586 Aug 1986 AU
8077587 Apr 1988 AU
1723183 Apr 1989 AU
338139 Dec 1933 CA
531354 Oct 1958 CA
941626 Feb 1974 CA
1040452 Oct 1978 CA
1065154 Oct 1979 CA
DES. 47747 Jan 1981 CA
DES. 50020 Jul 1982 CA
DES. 51160 Apr 1983 CA
DES. 51313 May 1983 CA
DES. 51794 Sep 1983 CA
1182295 Feb 1985 CA
1188116 Jun 1985 CA
1194703 Oct 1985 CA
1197391 Dec 1985 CA
1204296 May 1986 CA
DES. 62875 Apr 1989 CA
DES. 63365 May 1989 CA
DES. 63366 May 1989 CA
DES. 65896 Apr 1990 CA
DES. 66760 Aug 1990 CA
DES. 67904 Jan 1991 CA
2012286 Sep 1991 CA
205452 Sep 1939 CH
47747 Jan 1981 CH
657 172 Aug 1986 CH
663 437 Dec 1987 CH
669 001 Feb 1989 CH
22 59 654 Jun 1974 DE
18 11 932 Jun 1978 DE
27 55 833 Jul 1978 DE
27 19 107 Nov 1978 DE
657 172 Dec 1978 DE
28 41 001 Apr 1980 DE
34 01 629 Jul 1984 DE
90 15 196.8 Apr 1991 DE
0 039 372 Nov 1981 EP
0 130 921 Jan 1985 EP
0 170 113 Jul 1985 EP
0 215 991 Sep 1985 EP
0 322 668 Dec 1988 EP
0 362 110 Apr 1990 EP
392 474 Nov 1908 FR
1 360 872 Apr 1963 FR
2 228 900 May 1974 FR
2 243 304 Sep 1974 FR
2 343 871 May 1976 FR
2 409 351 Nov 1977 FR
2 422 780 Dec 1978 FR
2 463 237 Aug 1979 FR
2 465 032 Sep 1979 FR
2 476 179 Feb 1980 FR
12 561 684 Mar 1984 FR
0 215 991 Jan 1987 FR
1604-40091 Apr 1987 FR
2 622 227 Dec 1989 FR
0 362 110 Apr 1990 FR
336 Feb 1871 GB
107338 Dec 1916 GB
154397 Oct 1919 GB
536434 Dec 1940 GB
537153 Jun 1941 GB
1 385 207 Jan 1975 GB
1 386 088 Mar 1975 GB
1 477 139 Jun 1977 GB
2 091 775 Aug 1982 GB
2 127 872 Apr 1984 GB
2 213 095 Aug 1989 GB
0 490 534 Nov 1991 GB
456776 Apr 1950 IT
459942 Oct 1950 IT
709599 Jun 1966 IT
92167 Jul 1948 NZ
151299 Apr 1969 NZ
218330 Sep 1989 NZ
24781 May 1993 NZ
25131 Jun 1994 NZ
25132 Jun 1994 NZ
25133 Jun 1994 NZ
27313 Jun 1996 NZ
27314 Jun 1996 NZ
27315 Jun 1996 NZ
27316 Jun 1996 NZ
27317 Jun 1996 NZ
27318 Jun 1996 NZ
27346 Sep 1996 NZ
27675 Sep 1996 NZ
27676 Sep 1996 NZ
27677 Sep 1996 NZ
678160 Dec 1977 RU
1145106 May 1982 RU
1500005 Nov 1992 RU
Non-Patent Literature Citations (96)
Entry
Author Unknown, “Mortarless Perpend Keyed Jointed Block”, 2 pgs. (1978) and Stepped Retaining Wall Units with Rear Downset Leg Produced on Besser Machines.
Author Unknown, title unknown, 1 pg. (1989).
Author Unknown, “3 easy holdups”, Popular Science, (Jul. 1989).
Blaha B., “Retaining Wall System Keyed to Success”, 3 pgs. (date unknown).
Hubler, Jr., R., “Single-element retaining wall system is ideal for block producers”, pp. 30-33 (Sep. 1983).
Nanazashvily, I. K., Stroitelnyie materialyi iz drevesno-cementnoy6 kompozitsii.L, stoyizdat, Leningradskoe otdelenie, Fig. 11.2, pp. 334-335 (1990).
Nanazashvily, T.K., “Stroitelnye materialy is drevesho-cementhoy kampozitsii”, pp. 1-7, 334-335 (1990).
Pfeiffenberger, L., A Review of Paver Production On Besser Block Machines, pp. 35-37 (date unknown).
Pfeiffenberger, L., “Besser Technical Data for the Blockmaker”, 4 pgs. (Fall 1982).
Pfeiffenberger, L., “High Quality Pavers From a Besser V3-12 Block Machine”.
Turin, “Universal Concrete Masonry or Precast Garden Unit”, 2 pgs. (1972).
Advanced concrete technology Features New Design, 2 pgs. (Mar. 1989).
Anchor Autoclave Product Literature (1990).
“Articulated Revetment Units” (author and date unknown).
“Australian Concrete Technology”, p. 296 (author and date unknown).
Aztech Wall System Installation Guide, Block Systems, Inc. (1989).
“Beautify Your Landscape”, Block Systems, Inc. (Aug. 1990).
“Besser-Crib Wall” (date unknown).
Besser Company Accessories Catalog, pp. 15-16 (1984).
Besser Concrete Paving Stones, Section 5, pp. 1-24 (date unknown).
Besser Parts & Equipment Catalog, pp. 1-80 (date unknown).
Catalog sheet “The Allan Block Advantage” (date unknown).
“Color Crib Wall”, Brik Blok Industries (date unknown).
“Concrib”, Cavitex Concrete Masonry Ltd. (date unknown).
Columbia Machine Mold Descriptions (date uknown).
“Columbia Retaining Wall Block”, Columbia Machine, Inc. (date unknown).
“Cribwallining-techniques and design considerations”, N.Z. Portland Cement Assoc. (Apr. 1970).
Diamond Block Test Report to University of Wisconsin, Platteville (1990).
Diamond Wall System Installation Guide, 2 pgs. (1989).
“Diamond Wall Systems: The Cutting Edge”, Anchor Block Co. (date unkown).
Drawing, Mar. 22, 1989, “Garden Unit”.
Drawing, 890331, “Garden Unit”.
“Eskoo-kleine Kreuzwand”, SF Kooperation gmbh (date unkown).
“Erosion control system produced on a block machine”, D. Gehring (date unknown).
Excerpts from deposition testimony of Paul J. Forsberg.
Excerpts from deposition testimony of Robert McDonald.
“EZ Wall Systems” Product Literature, Rockwood Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. (date unknown).
“Florakron System”, Kronimus Betonsteinwerke (date unknown).
“Florida block and r/m plant relies on admixtures”, 1 pg. (date unknown).
“Garden Wall” Prodct Literature (1991).
“Handy-Stone Retaining Wall System” Product Literature (date unknown).
“Heinzmann Green Wall System”, gebr. Heinzmann (date unknown).
“Information for the Planting and Maintenance of Crib Wall Vegetation”, Humes, Ltd. (date unknown).
“Instructions Little Mighty 550”, Permacrib (date unknown).
“Ivany Block” Retaining Walls (date unknown).
“Jewell Concrete Products, Inc. Expands to New Markets”, Besser Block (Fall 1988).
“Johnson Block” Product Literature (date unknown).
“Keystone International Compac Unit” Product Literature (1992).
Keystone internal memorandum, Mar. 21, 1989, Dave Jenkyns to Dave Bear.
Keystone internal memorandum, Apr. 28, 1989, Dave Jenkyns to Dave Bear.
“Keystone Retaining Wall Systems” Product Literature (1992).
Kawano Cement Brochure (date unknown).
“Landscape Architecture”, p. 99 (Aug. 1989).
“Landscape Architecture”, p. 101 (Dec. 1989).
“Landscape Architecture”, p. 103 (Apr. 1993).
Letter, Mar. 21, 1989, David Bear to Tim Bakke.
Letter, Mar. 29, 1989, Cynthia A. Verdine to Paul Forsberg, with enclosed quote.
Letter, Mar. 29, 1989, Cynthia A. Verdine to Paul Forsberg.
Letter, Jul. 18, 1990, William R. Baach to Lonn Hanson of Minn Key.
“Lo-Crib”, Rocia (date unknown).
“Mini-Type Crib Walls”, Humes, Ltd. (date unknown).
“Minicrib Retaining Walls”, Humes, Ltd. (date unknown).
Minn Key Licensee Monthly Report for the period May 1, 1990 thorugh May 31, 1990.
Minn Key Licensee Monthly Report for the period of Jun. 1, 1990 through Jun. 30, 1990.
“Modular Concrete Block”, the Besser Co. (date uknown).
“New Mortarless Block Retaining Wall System”, Concrete Products (Mar. 1989).
Orco Block Co., “Split Face Block” Product Literature (date unknown).
“Paving Stone: New Look with Old World Charm”, the Besser Co. (date unknown).
“Pinned Cribbing”, Rocia (date unknown).
“Pisa II, Dura-Hold, Dura-Crib”, Risi Stone, Ltd. (date unknown).
“Pisa II” Interlocking Retaining Wall Supplies for Garden Landscaping (date unknown).
Profile Hex Masonry Units, 2 pgs. (date unkown).
Retaining Wall Block Pictures (date unknown).
“SF Kooperation”, SF-Vollverbundstein-Kooperation GmbH (date unknown).
“Slope and Road Paving Block”, Columbia Machine, Inc. (circa 1970-75).
“Soil Stabilisation and Erosion Control Systems”, Winstone (Jul. 1974).
Standard Load Bearing Wall Tire Literature (1924).
“Strabenbau heute”, (author and date unknown).
“Terrace Block,” Besser (Qld.), Ltd. (date unkown).
“The Allan Block Advantage” (date unknown).
“The easy, economical Crib System Wall . . . ”, Monier Masonry (date unknown).
“The Estate Wall by Unilock”, Unilock Chicago, Inc. (date unknown).
“TubaWall”, Tubag (date unknown).
“Uni-Multiwall”, F. von Langsdorff-Buverfahren GmbH (date unknown).
“Unibank Creative Embankment”, Rocia Masonry (May 1995).
U.S. Copyright Registration TX 2 807 652.
U.S. Copyright Registration TX 2 798 584.
Various Diamond Wall System 4 and 4.4 Concrete Masonry Units Tech Spec's, Anchor Block (1988, 1989).
“V-Blocks”, Humes, Ltd. (date unknown).
“Versa Lock” Product Literature (date uknown).
Weiser Concrete, Inc., Weiser Slope Blocks Advertisement (date unknown).
“Windsor Stone” Product Literature, Block Systems, Inc. (1991).
PISA II Interlocking Retaining Wall System, 2 pages.
Statutory Declaration of A1 Pfannenstein, Aug. 28, 1998.
Christie and Issacs, Australian Concrete Masonry Design and Construction (Mar. 1976), 6 pages.
Keystone brochure entitled “Beautiful Do-It-Yourself Results,” Library of Congress, Jun. 27, 1988, 2 pages.
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/665231 Sep 2000 US
Child 09/954616 US
Parent 09/497250 Feb 2000 US
Child 09/665231 US
Parent 09/160916 Sep 1998 US
Child 09/497250 US
Parent 08/921481 Sep 1997 US
Child 09/160916 US
Parent 08/675572 Jul 1996 US
Child 08/921481 US
Parent 08/469795 Jun 1995 US
Child 08/675572 US
Parent 08/157830 Nov 1993 US
Child 08/469795 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 07/413400 Sep 1989 US
Child 07/534831 US
Parent 07/413050 Sep 1989 US
Child 07/413400 US