Patent Grant
7811359
The field of the invention relates to composite membranes and more particularly, to membranes for separating carbon dioxide.
Fossil fuel based power plants emit carbon dioxide, which is a greenhouse gas. Exhaust gases include up to about 15 percent by volume carbon dioxide, which is required to be isolated from the other gaseous components to reduce the exhaust of greenhouse gases. Other gaseous components may include nitrogen, oxygen and water vapor.
A currently practiced method to capture carbon dioxide involves chemical absorption in an amine solution. When gaseous components are bubbled through an amine solution, the acidic carbon dioxide alone is absorbed by the alkaline amine solution. Later, the absorbed carbon dioxide is released by a thermal process. This process is environmentally unfriendly, costly and requires a large area.
Conventionally, polymeric membranes have been used in gas separation. Thin polymeric membranes lead to a high flux of gas at low pressures. However, the strength of polymeric membranes limits the usable gas pressures and thereby, the flux through the membranes. Also, polymeric membranes may not hold up to the harsh environment and high temperatures of exhaust gas from power plants.
EP Publication No. 0254556 discloses a semipermeable thin film membrane of siloxane oligomers or copolymers for acid gas separation from hydrocarbon gases. The membrane may be formed on a microporous polymer support. As a material, siloxane has the advantage of high permeability to gas molecules and a good selectivity. However, the mechanical properties of siloxane are too poor to impart structural stability.
What is needed is a highly stable membrane for separating carbon dioxide from mixed gases at high flux, at high temperatures and in a harsh environment.
In one embodiment, a membrane for separating carbon dioxide from a mixture of gases comprising carbon dioxide, wherein the membrane comprises expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polysiloxane.
In another embodiment, a method for separating carbon dioxide from a gas mixture comprising carbon dioxide, wherein the method comprises feeding the gas mixture through a membrane comprising expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polysiloxane.
The various embodiments provide a highly stable membrane for separating carbon dioxide from mixed gases at high flux in harsh environments and high temperatures, such as exhaust gases from power plants. The membrane has high strength, good selectivity and high tear strength.
The singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The endpoints of all ranges reciting the same characteristic are independently combinable and inclusive of the recited endpoint. All references are incorporated herein by reference.
The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., includes the tolerance ranges associated with measurement of the particular quantity).
“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, or that the subsequently identified material may or may not be present, and that the description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs or where the material is present, and instances where the event or circumstance does not occur or the material is not present.
In one embodiment, a membrane for separating carbon dioxide from a mixture of gases comprising carbon dioxide, wherein the membrane comprises expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polysiloxane.
The mixture of gases may be exhaust gases from coal fired power plants. In one embodiment, the mixture of gases may comprise carbon dioxide and nitrogen. In another embodiment, the mixture of gases may comprise carbon dioxide and oxygen. In another embodiment, the mixture of gases may comprise carbon dioxide, nitrogen and oxygen. In one embodiment, the mixture of gases comprises from about 3 to about 15 percent by volume carbon dioxide, from about 70 to about 90 percent by volume nitrogen and from about 1 to about 15 percent by volume oxygen. The mixture may also contain other gases, such as water vapor, argon or sulfur dioxide.
Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is an expanded form of polytetrafluoroethylene that is substantially more porous and stronger than polytetrafluoroethylene. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is prepared by stretching polytetrafluoroethylene in one or more directions between 35° C. and 327° C. at a rate exceeding about 10 percent per second. Methods for making expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566, which is incorporated herein by reference. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes may be obtained commercially.
The polysiloxane may be any type of polysiloxane. In one embodiment, the polysiloxane is a polyorganosiloxane. In another embodiment, the polyorganosiloxane is crosslinked. The polyorganosiloxane is reacted with a crosslinker and catalyst.
The polyorganosiloxane may be linear or branched. In one embodiment, the polyorganosiloxane has the formula:
MDqTsM
R2 is an alkoxy, aryloxy or araalkoxy containing from 1 to 60 carbon atoms, including 1 to 30 carbon atoms; R3, R4 and R5 are each independently alkyl, aryl or aralkyl containing from one to sixty carbon atoms, including one to 30 carbon atoms and one to 10 carbon atoms; q and s are each independently integers from 0 to 300 and a is an integer from 1-3. In another embodiment q and s are each independently integers from 0 to 50 and in another embodiment, q and s are each independently integers from 0 to 20.
In one embodiment, the polyorganosiloxane has a viscosity in the range of from about 10 centistokes to about 1,000,000 centistokes. The viscosity of the polyorganosiloxane includes ranges having an upper limit of about 1,000,000 centistokes, about 500,000 centistokes, about 100,000 centistokes, about 10,000 centistokes, about 1000 centistokes, about 500 centistokes, about 250 centistokes and about 120 centistokes. The viscosity of the polyorganosiloxane includes ranges having a lower limit of about 10 centistokes, about 50 centistokes, about 90 centistokes, about 250 centistokes, about 500 centistokes, about 1000 centistokes, about 10,000 centistokes and about 100,000 centistokes. The lower limit amounts and the upper limit amounts are independently combinable to create ranges usable in the practice of the present invention. The viscosity is measured by Brookfield DV-II or HAAKE RheoStress 600 at 25° C.
In one embodiment, the polysiloxane is a linear or branched hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane.
The crosslinker may be any type of crosslinker suitable for crosslinking siloxanes including N-propyl silicate, tetraethylorthosilicate, tetrafutylorthosilicate, tri-functional silanes, such as trialkyl silanes and tetra-functional silanes, such as tetraalkyl silanes. The alkyl groups may be methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl and decyl. In one embodiment, the crosslinker is N-propyl silicate. The cross-linkers are added in quantities ranging from about 0.2 to about 5.0 equivalents of polysiloxane.
The catalyst may be any type of curing catalyst, including dibutyltin oxide and dibutyl tin oxide and dialkyl metal salts of carboxylic acid, such as dibutyl tin dilaurate and dibutyl tin diadipate. In one embodiment, the catalyst is a dibutyl tin oxide. The catalysts are added in quantities ranging from 0.2 to 5.0 equivalents of polysiloxane.
The crosslinker, polysiloxane and catalyst may be reacted in any conventional manner. The order of reactants is not essential and the reactants may be added in any order. The crosslinker and catalyst are used in equimolar amounts.
The polysiloxane may be crosslinked at any temperature suitable for curing polysiloxanes. In one embodiment, the polysiloxane may be cured from about room temperature to about 70° C. In another embodiment, the polysiloxane is cured at room temperature.
The membrane may be a composite structure comprising more than one layer. In one embodiment, the membrane comprises three layers. In one embodiment, the membrane comprises an active layer and two support layers. In another embodiment, the membrane comprises an active layer sandwiched between two support layers.
The support layer provides support to the membrane structure and is permeable to gases. The thickness of the support layers should be thick enough to support the membrane and thin enough to allow a high flux of gas through the membrane. In one embodiment, each support layer is in a range of from about 10 microns to about 50 microns. In another embodiment, each support layer is in a range from about 20 microns to about 40 microns. In another embodiment, each support layer is about 25 microns.
The active layer is more permeable to carbon dioxide than to nitrogen or oxygen and separates the carbon dioxide from the mixed gases. The thickness of the active layer should be thick enough to provide suitable selectivity for the membrane and thin enough to allow a high flux of gas through the membrane. In one embodiment, the active layer is in a range of from about 10 microns to about 600 microns. In another embodiment, the active layer is in a range from about 100 microns to about 500 microns. In another embodiment, the active layer is about 500 microns.
In one embodiment, each support layer comprises expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and the active layer comprises polysiloxane. In another embodiment, the membrane comprises an active layer comprising polysiloxane sandwiched between two layers comprising expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
The layers of the composite membrane are applied in any conventional manner. In one embodiment, the layers are applied by spraying, brushing, rolling, pouring, immersing, coating or by assembling preformed layers. In one embodiment, the composite membrane is prepared by applying a support layer to each side of an active layer. In another embodiment, an active layer is applied to a support layer by pouring the active layer material onto the support layer. In another embodiment, a polyorganosiloxane active layer is applied to an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene support layer by pouring the polyorganosiloxane on an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and applying a second expanded polytetrafluoroethylene support layer to the active polysiloxane layer and curing or crosslinking the polyorganosiloxane to the support layers. The crosslinked polyorganosiloxane layer has strong adhesion to each support expanded polytetrafluoroethylene layer providing a strong and highly stable membrane for harsh environments.
An exemplary embodiment is shown in
In another embodiment, a method for separating carbon dioxide from mixed gases comprising at least carbon dioxide, wherein the method comprises feeding the gas mixture through a membrane comprising expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polysiloxane.
The active layer may further comprise a porous ceramic to enhance the selectivity of the polysiloxane by modulating the pore diameter of the active layer. The ceramic comprises any type of ceramic. In one embodiment, the ceramic comprises zeolite, Al2O3, Y2O3, MgO, SiO2, Si3N4 or ZrO2. In another embodiment, the ceramic comprises zirconia or zeolites.
Zeolites are porous materials with pore diameters ranging from about 0.1 nm to 5.0 nm. The diameters can further be adjusted by incorporating metal ions inside the pores as exchangeable cations. In another embodiment, the zeolites are zeolite-A, ZSM-5 and zeolite Beta with exchanged metal ions, where the metal ions are alkali and alkaline earth metal ions, including sodium, potassium, lithium and rubidium.
The ceramic may be combined with the polysiloxane by mixing the ceramic with the polysiloxane to form a slurry that can be formed into an active layer. In one embodiment, the ceramic is mixed with the polysiloxane at a concentration of from about 10 to less than 65 percent by volume. In another embodiment, the ceramic is mixed with the polysiloxane in a range of from about 10 to about 60 percent by weight based on the weight of the polysiloxane.
In one embodiment, the pores of the membrane are suitable to achieve a separation factor of carbon dioxide to nitrogen from about 10 to about 100. In another embodiment, the separation factor is greater than 10. In one embodiment, the average pore size in the active layer is about 0.1 to about 1.0 nm. In another embodiment, the average pore size is from about 0.1 to about 2 nm.
Assembled membrane structures may be fitted in the exhaust from power plants or in the exhaust of gas or coal fired turbines.
In order that those skilled in the art will be better able to practice the present disclosure, the following examples are given by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
A composite membrane was prepared by using two extended polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes from BHA Technologies and hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) obtained from Gelest® having a viscosity of about 90-120 cSt. The PDMS was crosslinked with an equimolar mixture of N-propyl silicate and dibutyl tin oxide. PDMS was mixed with the N-propyl silicate and the dibutyl tin oxide in polymer cups and mixed by hand.
Two heavy glass slabs were used as support for the e-PTFE membranes. One e-PTFE membrane was wrapped snug on a glass slab. Four spacers of 0.5 mm thickness were placed on the wrapped e-PTFE membrane to control the thickness of the PDMS layer. The PDMS crosslinking mixture was poured on to the wrapped e-PTFE membrane at a thickness of 500 microns The other glass slab with the wrapped membrane was placed on top of the spacer after the PDMS slurry was poured onto the lower glass slab. The upper glass slab was lifted off a few minutes later. The membrane was left to cure at room temperature for 8 hours.
The cured membrane was cut into circular disks of having a diameter of 7 cm for permeability measurements. Permeability properties were determined using a constant pressure/variable volume apparatus shown in
From the rate of gas flow, the permeability of individual gases is calculated to be 6200 Barrers for CO2 and 600 Barrers for N2. The permeability measured for CO2 and N2 shows a selectivity of greater than 10 for carbon dioxide over nitrogen. Oxygen has a similar permeability as nitrogen and thus, the membrane shows a selectivity of greater than 10 for carbon dioxide over nitrogen and for carbon dioxide over oxygen.
Mechanical properties of this membrane were measured and are shown in Table 2 and are compared with an ePTFE membrane and a PDMS membrane. PDMS by itself, does not have enough mechanical strength to measure mechanical properties.
The Example 1 composite membrane has more mechanical and hydrostatic strength showed hydrostatic strength, increased tensile strength and modulus, is not permeable to air and has a reduced MD tensile elongation.
A composite membrane was prepared by using two extended polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes from BHA Technologies and hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) obtained from Gelest® having a viscosity of about 500,000 cSt. The PDMS was crosslinked with an equimolar mixture of N-propyl silicate and dibutyl-tin-oxide. PDMS was mixed with the N-propyl silicate and the dibutyl tin oxide in polymer cups and mixed by hand.
Two heavy glass slabs were used as support for the e-PTFE membranes. One e-PTFE membrane was wrapped snug on a glass slab. Four spacers of 0.5 mm thickness were placed on the wrapped e-PTFE membrane to control the thickness of the PDMS layer. The crosslinking mixture PDMS was poured on to the wrapped e-PTFE membrane at a thickness of the 500 microns. The other glass slab with the wrapped membrane was placed on top of the spacer after the PDMS slurry was poured onto the lower glass slab. The upper glass slab was lifted off a few minutes later. The membrane was left to cure at room temperature for 8 hours.
The cured membrane was cut into circular disks of having a diameter of 7 cm for permeability measurements. Permeability properties were determined using a constant pressure/variable volume apparatus shown in
From the rate of gas flow, the permeability of individual gases is calculated to be 2368 Barrers for CO2 and 226 Barrers for N2. The permeability measured for CO2 and N2 shows a selectivity of 10 for carbon dioxide over nitrogen.
A composite membrane was prepared by using two extended polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes from BHA Technologies and hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) obtained from Gelest® having a viscosity of about 90-120 cSt. The PDMS was crosslinked with an equimolar mixture of N-propyl silicate and dibutyl-tin-oxide. PDMS was mixed with the N-propyl silicate and the dibutyl tin oxide in polymer cups and mixed by hand. This is mixed with 11.8 g of beta-Zeolite. A uniform slurry mixture was formed using a planetary mixer.
Two heavy glass slabs were used as support for the e-PTFE membranes. One e-PTFE membrane was wrapped snug on a glass slab. Four spacers of 0.5 mm thickness were placed on the wrapped e-PTFE membrane to control the thickness of the slurry mixture layer. The slurry mixture was poured onto the wrapped e-PTFE membrane at a thickness of 500 microns. The other glass slab with the wrapped membrane was placed on top of the spacer after the slurry mixture was poured onto the lower glass slab. The upper glass slab was lifted off a few minutes later. The membrane was left to cure at room temperature for 8 hours.
The cured membrane was cut into circular disks having a diameter of 7 cm for permeability measurements. Permeability properties were determined using a constant pressure/variable volume apparatus as shown in
From the rate of gas flow, the permeability of individual gases is calculated to be 1850 Barrers for CO2 and 156 Barrers for N2. The permeability measured for CO2 and N2 shows a selectivity of greater than 10 for carbon dioxide over nitrogen. The addition of the zeolite improves the thermal stability while maintaining a good selectivity and good permeability.
While typical embodiments have been set forth for the purpose of illustration, the foregoing descriptions should not be deemed to be a limitation on the scope herein. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations and alternatives may occur to one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4187390 | Gore | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4533369 | Okita | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4551156 | Li et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4581043 | van der Scheer | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4631075 | Yamabe et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4664669 | Ohyabu et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4764560 | Mitchell | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4781733 | Babcock et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4781907 | McNeill | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4933082 | Yamada | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4945125 | Dillon et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5042992 | Blinka et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5049167 | Castro et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5061301 | Kim et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5104425 | Rao et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5181940 | Bikson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5242636 | Sluma et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5259950 | Shiro et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5332424 | Rao et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336298 | Quinn et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5356461 | Sluma et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5443728 | Macheras et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5464798 | Jia et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5595658 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5641332 | Faber et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5753009 | Sirkar et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5753011 | Sircar et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5850833 | Kotliar | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5943859 | Kawamura | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6017474 | Teo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6140263 | Anstett et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6152991 | Ackley | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6197091 | Ji et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221131 | Behling et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6235377 | Dillon et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6306491 | Kram et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315968 | Quinn et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6425936 | Sammons et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6454836 | Koelmel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6478857 | Czabala | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6508860 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6620472 | Shepard et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626980 | Hasse et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6663805 | Ekiner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6681648 | Dye et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6716275 | Reed et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 7255792 | Livington | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 20020045041 | Dillon et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062737 | Guiver et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20030084786 | Chau et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168407 | Kusakabe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040033370 | Chau et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040077075 | Jensen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149127 | Lyons et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040173094 | Nakayama et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182242 | Mitani et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213985 | Lee et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050026134 | Miller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087491 | Hennige et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103193 | Lyons et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050139066 | Miller et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050202307 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284294 | Lou et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060016332 | Ma et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034757 | Yan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144239 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0107636 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0175668 | Mar 1986 | EP |
| 0337499 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0144054 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0447971 | Sep 1991 | EP |
| 0480039 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0526857 | Feb 1993 | EP |
| 0343284 | Mar 1993 | EP |
| 0617996 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0254556 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0446471 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0506701 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0674939 | Oct 1995 | EP |
| 0597300 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 0674938 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0908219 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 1144099 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 1442783 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1575114 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 2138702 | Oct 1984 | GB |
| 2397303 | Jul 2004 | GB |
| 2397821 | Aug 2004 | GB |
| 07254128 | Oct 1966 | JP |
| 58008514 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 58223411 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| 59000301 | Jan 1984 | JP |
| 59066308 | Apr 1984 | JP |
| 60129119 | Jul 1985 | JP |
| 60139316 | Jul 1985 | JP |
| 62136224 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 62136225 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 63049220 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| 63141625 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| 63182017 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 63264101 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 63264122 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 63270525 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 63291809 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 63296821 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 63296822 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 01030620 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| 01155929 | Jun 1989 | JP |
| 01242123 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 01245036 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 02009430 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 02139023 | May 1990 | JP |
| 02218423 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 02222718 | Sep 1990 | JP |
| 03038225 | Feb 1991 | JP |
| 03042020 | Feb 1991 | JP |
| 03193124 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| 03262523 | Nov 1991 | JP |
| 03284320 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 06246143 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 08071385 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| 09094448 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 9-202615 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| 09313903 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 10036113 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 10036114 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 01-288315 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2005305371 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 9429002 | Dec 1994 | WO |
| 9508360 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| 9637176 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| 9943416 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 9945035 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 9945036 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0197957 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 0238258 | May 2002 | WO |
| 03093406 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2004016729 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2005063362 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005113121 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006037022 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080173179 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
