Patent Application
20190168484
The application relates generally to panels and, more particularly, to a composite panel and a method of forming same.
Wood composites typically consist of one type of wood adhered to another type of wood to provide a structural and/or aesthetic product. Some conventional wood composites must have a certain minimum thickness to provide them with the requisite structural properties for their given application. This minimum thickness, however, makes them unsuitable for other applications which require a thinner wood composite. Furthermore, some wood composites do not sufficiently resist moisture on their own, and thus require relatively costly coatings, or relatively complicated moisture barriers, to make them suitable for a given application.
In one aspect, there is provide a composite panel, comprising: a sheet having layers, at least two of the layers being kraft paper, the layers being stacked on each other and adhered together with a resin, the sheet being corrugated with alternating peaks and valleys disposed sequentially along an axis of the sheet, each peak having a plateau and each valley having a base, each of the plateaus and the bases lying in a plane being substantially parallel to the axis of the one sheet.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of forming a structural composite panel, comprising: stacking layers and adhering the layers together to form a sheet, at least two of the layers being kraft paper; and corrugating the sheet along an axis to form alternating peaks and valleys disposed sequentially along the axis, each peak having a plateau and each valley having a base, each of the plateaus and the bases lying in a plane being substantially parallel to the axis of the sheet.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
Referring to
The layers 20 are adhered together with the resin 22. The resin 22 can be any suitable compound or adhesive that is capable of such functionality. For example, the resin 22 can be a thermoset resin 22. Some non-limiting examples of resins 22 that can be used include poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc), polymeric Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (pMDI), phenol formaldehyde (PF), and Melamine Urea Formaldehyde (MUF). Any number of applications of resin 22, having any suitable thickness, can be applied to one or both of the surfaces of the layers 20. When the resin 22 is applied, one or both of the temperature and a humidity level of the resin 22 can be controlled. The pressure at which the resin 22 is applied may also be controlled. Furthermore, the temperature and pressure at which the resin 22 is applied can be optimised depending on a number of factors, such as the type of resin 22 being used, and the thickness of the layers 20.
The corrugated sheet 11 is shaped to have alternating peaks 23 and valleys 24 disposed sequentially along an axis 25 of the sheet 11. The axis 25 of the sheet 11 is the axis 25 along which the sheet 11 is corrugated. Along the axis 25 of the sheet 11, each peak 23 is immediately adjacent to a valley 24, which is immediately adjacent to another peak 23. It will be appreciated that the designation of peaks 23 and valleys 24 can be inverted, such that the peaks 23 become valleys 24 and vice versa when the sheet 11 is inverted.
Each peak 23 has a plateau 23A and each valley 24 has a base 24A. The plateau 23A includes the highest surface of the peak 23, and the base 24A includes the lowest surface of the valley 24. The plateaus 23A and the bases 24A are the portions of the sheet 11 spaced furthest from each other in a direction transverse to the axis 25. The plateaus 23A and the bases 24A are planar bodies. In the depicted embodiment, they are substantially flat members which lie in a plane that is substantially parallel to the axis 25. The corrugated sheet 11 also has intermediate segments 26 which extend between and interconnect the adjacent peaks 23 and valleys 24. One end of each intermediate segment 26 has a first joint portion 26A connecting the intermediate segment 26 to the plateau 23A. The other, opposite end of each intermediate segment 26 has a second joint portion 26B connecting the intermediate segment 26 to the base 24A. The flat plateaus 23A and flat bases 24A, in conjunction with the intermediate segments 26, provide the corrugated sheet 11 with a trapezoidal shape. The trapezoidal corrugation of the sheet 11 may help to better resist compressive forces. The trapezoidal corrugation of the sheet 11 allows facilitates the stacking or nesting of one sheet 11 over the other, as shown in
Possible dimensions for the corrugation of the composite panel 10 are now discussed in reference to
Still referring to
The first joint portion 26A of the intermediate segments 26 is curved and has a first radius of curvature R1. The second joint portion 26B is also curved and has a second radius of curvature R2. The intermediate segments 26 are therefore joined to the plateaus 23A and the bases 24A along curved portions 26A,26B. In the depicted embodiment, the first radius of curvature R1 is different than the second radius of curvature R2. More particularly, the first radius of curvature R1 is about 5.7°, with a variation on either side of 0.1°. The second radius of curvature R2 is about 3.1°, with a variation on either side of 0.1°. An angle of corrugation a is defined between a plane P being perpendicular to the axis 25 and each intermediate segment 26. The angle of corrugation a in
Part of another embodiment of the panel 110 is shown in
The wood veneer 40 has wood fibers 42 or grains which have an orientation. The orientation of the wood fibers 42 may depend on the manner by which the layer of wood veneer 40 is made. For example, where the layer of wood veneer 40 is peeled from an elongated log, the wood fibers 42 will have an orientation being substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the log. It is observed that the wood veneer 40 provides a relatively stiff resistance to bending in the direction of the orientation of its wood fibers 42, while being relatively pliable in a direction that is transverse to the orientation of its wood fibers 42. It can thus be appreciated that the orientation of the wood fibers 42 can be selected to optimise bending and/or pliability along any desired direction. The wood veneer 40 can be provided so that the majority of its wood fibers 42 are substantially parallel to one another, and oriented in the same direction. For example, at least 70% of the wood fibers 42 of the wood veneer 40 can be oriented along one direction. This single direction can be parallel to the axis 25 of the sheet 111, or transverse thereto. In alternate embodiments, the layers 20 include more than one layer of wood veneer 40.
Each layer of wood veneer 40 has a first side 44 and a second side 46. The first and second sides 44,46 define exposed outer surfaces of the wood veneer 40 against which the resin 22 may be applied. While the first and second sides 44,46 define substantially continuous surfaces, the wood fibers 42 of the wood veneer 40 are not perfectly or uniformly distributed at the surfaces such that pores 48 may be formed at the surfaces. Stated differently, the pores 48 extend into the body of the wood veneer 40 from the surfaces defined by its first and second sides 44,46. The pores 48 collectively form a wood matrix 49 that extends at least partially into the body of the wood veneer 40 from each of its first and second sides 44,46. The resin 22 penetrates into the wood matrix 49 to seal the pores 48.
The resin 22 is applied to one, or both, of the first and second sides 44,46 of the wood veneer 40. The application of the resin 22 over the surfaces defined by the first and second sides 44,46 fills the pores 48 with the resin 22, which penetrates into the wood matrix 49. The resin 22 blocks the pores 48 and therefore seals them to prevent the ingress of moisture into the wood veneer 40.
Still referring to
In the configuration where the composite panel 10 is made up of two abutting wood veneers 40 covered on their exposed surfaces by liners, the resin 22 is applied to both the first and second sides 44,46 of the first wood veneer 40, the kraft paper 21 is applied over the resin-filled pores 48 of one of the first and second sides 44,46 of the first wood veneer 40, the second wood veneer 40 is applied over the resin-filled pores 48 of the other side 44,46 of the first wood veneer 40, the resin 22 is applied to the free side of the second wood veneer 40, and another layer of kraft paper 21 is applied over the resin 22 of the free side of the second wood veneer 40 to adhere the second kraft paper 21 to the free side of the second wood veneer 40. It is therefore possible to form many configurations of the composite panel 10 including, but not limited to, liner-resin-liner (i.e. kraft paper-resin-kraft paper), liner-resin-veneer-resin-liner, and liner-resin-veneer-resin-veneer-liner. In an alternate embodiment, the liner is a polymer film or sheet.
It can thus be appreciated that the resin 22 and its parameters of application can be optimised to encourage “polymerisation” with the wood veneer 40, a process similar to the chemical reaction by which monomer molecules react together to form polymer chains. Stated differently, the resin 22 becomes embedded at depth in the wood matrix 49 of the wood veneer 40 such that, when the resin 22 is cured, the resin 22 and wood veneer 40 are integral with one another. The resin 22 therefore both seals the pores 48 of the wood matrix 49, and serves as an adhesive to strongly bind the kraft paper 21 to the wood veneer 40.
In the depicted embodiment, in which the liner is a layer of kraft paper 21, the kraft paper 21 contributes to the strength of the composite panel 110. The kraft paper 21 has paper fibers 62, the majority of which are oriented along the same direction. In the depicted embodiment, the paper fibers 62 are oriented substantially transverse to the orientation of the wood fibers 42 (which are shown being oriented into the page). It can thus be appreciated that the kraft paper 21, once adhered to the wood veneer 40 via the resin 22, helps to reinforce the strength of the composite panel 110, particularly in the direction along which the paper fibers 62 are oriented. In such a configuration, the kraft paper 21 reinforces the composite wood material 30 in a direction that is transverse to the orientation of the wood fibers 42. This is desirable because the composite panel 10 is expected to have the least amount of mechanical resistance in the direction transverse to the wood fibers 42. The kraft paper 21 therefore allows the wood fibers 42 to be linked across the grain direction of the wood veneer 40. In embodiments where the kraft paper 21 has a relatively high tensile strength, it contributes to the overall strength of the composite panel 110.
The orientation of the paper fibers 62 of the layers of kraft paper 21 may also contribute to the overall strength of the composite panel 10 in
Examples of layers of kraft paper 21, and their thickness and weight, are now discussed. One possible material for the layers of kraft paper 21 includes Chipboard 20 pts. The thickness of a single layer of Chipboard 20 pts. is 0.51 mm or 0.02 in. An embodiment of the composite panel 10 having only two layers of Chipboard 20 pts. adhered together with the resin 22 provided a thickness of 0.97 mm or 0.04 in, and a weight of 99.1 g/ft2. Another possible material for the layers of kraft paper 21 includes Chipboard 30 pts. The thickness of a single layer of Chipboard 30 pts. is 0.75 mm or 0.03 in. An embodiment of the composite panel 10 having only two layers of Chipboard 30 pts. adhered together with the resin 22 provided a thickness of 1.59 mm or 0.06 in, and a weight of 137.1 g/ft2. An embodiment of the composite panel 110 having two layers of paper liner 21 adhered to a core layer of wood veneer 40, as shown in
Testing was performed on embodiments of the composite panel 10,110 of the present disclosure, and the results are now described in greater detail. Table 1 below presents the results of testing to determine the modulus of elasticity (MOE), the edgewise compression strength (ECT), and the flat crush test (FCT) for a composite panel 10 having only two layers of kraft paper 21, of either Chipboard 20 pts. or the thicker Chipboard 20 pts., adhered together with the resin 22.
Table 1 reveals that by increasing the thickness of each layer of kraft paper 21 by about 0.25 mm or 0.01 in., a relatively small amount, improvements in MOE, ECT, and FCT are obtained.
Table 2 below presents the results of testing to determine the MOE, the ECT, and the FCT for a composite panel 110 having two layers of kraft paper 21 adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40. In the middle column, the kraft paper 21 is 28 lb medium and the wood veneer is 0.8 mm thick BassWood. In the right column, the kraft paper 21 is Chipboard 30 pts. and the wood veneer is 0.8 mm thick BassWood. Thus the only difference between the two constructions of the composite panel 110 is the layer of kraft paper 21.
Table 2 reveals that by increasing the thickness of each layer of kraft paper 21 by a relatively small amount, improvements in MOE, ECT, and FCT are obtained. Indeed, the FCT, which is a measure of the resistance of the composite panel 110 to compression, and thus a measure of the structural strength of the composite panel 110, more than doubles.
Table 3 below presents the results of testing to determine the MOE, the ECT, and the FCT for another composite panel 110 having two layers of 28 lb medium kraft paper 21 adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40. In the middle column, the wood veneer is 0.6 mm thick BassWood. In the right column, the wood veneer is 0.7 mm thick Birch Wood. Thus the only difference between the two constructions of the composite panel 110 is the core layer of wood veneer 40.
Table 3 reveals that by increasing the thickness of the core layer of wood veneer 40 by a relatively small amount (i.e. 0.1 mm or 0.004 in.), improvements in MOE, ECT, and FCT are obtained.
Table 4 below illustrates the effect of adding a core layer of wood veneer 40 between two layers of kraft paper 21. Table 4 below presents the results of testing to determine the MOE, the ECT, and the FCT for i) a composite panel 10 having only two layers of kraft paper 21 of Chipboard 30 pts. (middle column), and ii) a composite panel 110 having two layers of kraft paper 21 of Chipboard 30 pts. adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40 of 0.8 mm thick BassWood (right column). Thus the only difference between the two constructions of the composite panel 10,110 is the core layer of wood veneer 40.
Table 4 reveals that by providing a core layer of wood veneer 40 between two layers of kraft paper 21, and thus increasing the thickness of the composite panel 10,110 by a relatively small amount, improvements in MOE, ECT, and FCT are obtained. Indeed, the FCT, which is a measure of the resistance of the composite panel 10,110 to compression, and thus a measure of the structural strength of the composite panel 110, almost doubles. The MOE increases about fivefold, and the ECT increases more than fourfold.
Table 5 below illustrates the effect of adding different layers of kraft paper 21 to the same core layer of wood veneer 40. Table 5 below presents the results of testing to determine the MOE, the ECT, and the FCT for i) a composite panel 110 having only two layers of kraft paper 21 of 28 lb medium (middle column) adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40 of 0.8 mm thick BassWood, and ii) a composite panel 110 having two layers of kraft paper 21 of Chipboard 30 pts. adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40 of 0.8 mm thick BassWood (right column). Thus the only difference between the two constructions of the composite panel 110 is the type of kraft paper 21.
Table 5 reveals that by increasing the thickness of each layer of kraft paper 21 adhered to the same core layer of wood veneer 40 by a relatively small amount, improvements in MOE, ECT, and FCT are obtained. Indeed, the FCT, which is a measure of the resistance of the composite panel 110 to compression, and thus a measure of the structural strength of the composite panel 110, more than doubles.
Table 6 below illustrates the effect of changing the core layer of wood veneer 40 between two identical layers of kraft paper 21. Table 6 below presents the results of testing to determine the MOE, the ECT, and the FCT for i) a composite panel 110 having two layers of kraft paper 21 of 28 lb medium (middle column) adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40 of 0.6 mm thick BassWood, and ii) a composite panel 110 having two layers of kraft paper 21 of 28 lb medium adhered to a central core layer of wood veneer 40 of 0.7 mm thick Birch Wood (right column). Thus the only difference between the two constructions of the composite panel 110 is the type of wood species used for the core layer of wood veneer 40.
Table 6 reveals that by changing the species of wood for the core layer of wood veneer 40 and by increasing the thickness of the core layer of wood veneer 40 by a relatively small amount, improvements in MOE, ECT, and FCT are obtained.
Referring to
Referring to
The method also includes curing the resin 22 to form the composite panel 10,110. The step of curing can take many forms and will be largely dependent on the resin 22 being used. For example, some resins 22 can be air-cured, while others are cured through the application of heat. Pressure can also be applied to the liner-resin-wood veneer construction during the curing process. Once cured, the resin 22 is irreversibly linked with the wood veneer 40 and/or its wood fibers 42, as well as with the kraft paper 21.
It can thus be appreciated that the present disclosure relates to a composite panel 10, in one embodiment, having its primary structural properties provided by layers of kraft paper 21. The composite panel 10 is therefore a corrugated paper product that provides structural strength with relatively thin layers of paper.
It can be further appreciated that the present disclosure relates to a composite panel 110, which in one embodiment, having its primary structural properties provided by a wood veneer 40 core in combination with kraft paper 21. The penetration of the resin 22 into the wood matrix 49 allows for the formation of an integrated, rigid, and reinforced composite panel 110.
The possibility of controlling the orientation of the wood fibers 42, and thus controlling the direction of flexion of the composite panel 110, allows the composite panel 110 to be provided as a flat object, or a rolled sheet.
Indeed, the ability to provide both the wood veneer 40 and the kraft paper 21 in sheet form allows the composite panel 10,110 to be formed from a continuous fabrication process in which a sheet of the wood veneer 40 is displaced with rollers, the resin 22 is applied, and a sheet of the kraft paper 21 is placed onto the resin 22 using rollers and pressed thereagainst. Such a fabrication process is rapid and cost-effective.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2017/050888 with a filing date of Jul. 25, 2017, designating the United States, now pending, and further claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/367,245 with a filing date of Jul. 27, 2016. The content of the aforementioned applications, including any intervening amendments thereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62367245 | Jul 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/CA2017/050888 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Child | 16259217 | US |
