COMPOSITE POWDER AND COSMETIC CONTAINING SAME

Abstract
Use of a composite powder characterized in that a plate-like powder is adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent, and a cosmetic characterized by containing the composite powder provides a composite powder having texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement similar to those of plastic microbeads, and a cosmetic blended with the composite powder.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a composite powder to serve as an alternative for plastic microbeads and a cosmetic containing the same.


BACKGROUND ART

Conventionally, plastic microbeads have been widely used in various formulations for the purpose of improving texture, imparting light diffusing properties, and imparting an SPF enhancing effect. Plastic microbeads are a powder, a film, or a fiber of a solid synthetic polymer (plastic) of 5 mm or less.


However, in recent years, the impact of plastic microbeads on the marine environment has been regarded as a problem, and a cosmetic in which the blending amount of plastic microbeads is reduced or plastic microbeads are not blended has been demanded.


As a cosmetic in which plastic microbeads are not blended, for example, a solid powder cosmetic characterized in that a cosmetic base material prepared by mixing a powder containing spherical nonporous silica with an oil agent is mixed with a solvent to form a slurry, and the slurry is filled in a container, and then, the solvent is removed is known (PTL 1) .


However, this cosmetic has a problem that the texture is poor and the effect as a cosmetic is low as compared with cosmetics using plastic microbeads.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature

PTL 1: JP2020-93996A


SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem

In view of the above circumstances, an object of the invention is to provide a composite powder having texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement similar to those of plastic microbeads, and a cosmetic blended with the composite powder.


Solution to Problem

As a result of intensive studies to solve the above problem, the present inventors have found that a composite powder in which a plate-like powder is adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent has texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement similar to those of plastic microbeads, and thus completed the invention.


That is, the invention is directed to a composite powder characterized in that a plate-like powder is adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent.


Further, the invention is directed to a cosmetic characterized by containing the composite powder.


Still further, the invention is directed to a method for producing a composite powder characterized by including the following steps (a) and (b):

    • (a) a step of mixing and heating an oil agent, a spherical powder, and a dispersion medium, thereby obtaining the spherical powder coated with the oil agent; and
    • (b) a step of stirring the spherical powder coated with the oil agent and a plate-like powder, thereby obtaining a composite powder in which the plate-like powder is adhered to the spherical powder coated with the oil agent.


Advantageous Effects of Invention

The composite powder of the invention has texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement similar to those of plastic microbeads.


Therefore, a cosmetic containing the composite powder of the invention is equivalent to a conventional cosmetic blended with plastic microbeads, but has a low environmental impact because there is no need to incorporate plastic microbeads, and thus is superior to the conventional one.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an electron micrograph of a composite powder obtained in Example 1 (4,000 times).



FIG. 2 is an electron micrograph of a composite powder obtained in Example 5 (3,000 times).



FIG. 3 is an evaluation sheet used for texture evaluation.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The composite powder of the invention is a powder in which a plate-like powder is adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent. Here, the phrase “is adhered” means that a state in which a plate-like powder is in contact with a surface of a spherical powder coated with an oil agent is observed with a scanning electron microscope. Further, the adhesion of a plate-like powder to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent may be partially or entirely.


The oil agent is not particularly limited as long as the spherical powder can be coated therewith, but for example, a semi-solid oil agent or a solid oil agent having no fluidity at ordinary temperature (15 to 25° C.) is preferred. Examples of the semi-solid oil agent include hydrocarbon-based semi-solid oil agents, ester-based semi-solid oil agents, ether-based semi-solid oil agents, and silicone-based semi-solid oil agents, and for example, hydrocarbon-based semi-solid oil agents such as petrolatum, ester-based semi-solid oil agents such as dipentaerythrityl hexa (hydroxystearate/stearate/rosinate), dipentaerythrityl (hydroxystearate/stearate/rosinate), dipentaerythrityl hexahydroxystearate, dipentaerythrityl tetra (hydroxystearate/isostearate), dipentaerythrityl (hydroxystearate/isostearate), (caprylic/capric/myristic/stearic) triglyceride, bis-diglyceryl polyacyladipate-2, hydrogenated castor oil stearate, hydrogenated castor oil isostearate, hydrogenated castor oil hydroxystearate, hydrogenated palm oil, hydrogenated coconut oil, cholesteryl hydroxystearate, phytosteryl oleate, phytosteryl macadamia nut oil fatty acid, phytosteryl sunflower seed oil fatty acid, phytosteryl isostearate, (phytosteryl/isosteryl/cetyl/stearyl/behenyl) dimer dilinolate, dimer dilinoleyl bis(behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl) dimer dilinoleate, sucrose pentahydroxystearate, and di(octyldodecyl/phytosteryl/behenyl) lauroyl glutamate, ether-based semi-solid oil agents such as hydroxyalkyl dimer silinoleyl ether, and silicone-based semi-solid oil agents such as dimethicone crosspolymer and (dimethicone/vinyl dimethicone) crosspolymer.


In addition, as the solid oil agent, for example, a hydrocarbon-based solid oil agent, an ester-based solid oil agent, a higher alcohol-based solid oil agent, a silicone-based solid oil agent, or the like can be used. Examples thereof include hydrocarbon-based solid oil agents such as paraffin wax, ceresin wax, microcrystalline wax, polyethylene wax, ethylene/propylene copolymer, montan wax, and Fischer-Tropsch wax, ester-based solid oil agents such as hydrogenated jojoba oil, beeswax, carnauba wax, candelilla wax, rice wax, (eicosene/vinylpyrrolidone) copolymer, α-olefin/vinylpyrrolidone copolymer, and glyceryl tribehenate, higher alcohol-based solid oil agents such as stearyl alcohol, cetanol, lauryl alcohol, and behenyl alcohol, and silicone-based solid oil agents such as trimethylsiloxysilicate, polysilsesquioxane, (acrylates/dimethicone) copolymer, (acrylates/behenyl acrylate/dimethicone methacrylate) copolymer, (acrylates/stearyl acrylate/dimethicone methacrylate) copolymer, C30-45 alkyl methicone, stearyl dimethicone, stearoxytrimethylsilane, and C30-45 alkyldimethylsilyl polypropylsilsesquioxane.


Among these oil agents, ester-based semi-solid oil agents and ester-based solid oil agents are preferred, and ester-based semi-solid oil agents are more preferred. Further, these oil agents can be used alone or by combining two or more types thereof.


Since the composite powder of the invention is an alternative technique for plastic microbeads, the spherical powder is not particularly limited as long as it is not a plastic. Examples thereof include silica, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, zirconium oxide, cerium oxide, calcium carbonate, barium sulfate, cellulose, and silk, and one in which the surface thereof is coated or encapsulated with titanium oxide, iron oxide, or the like may also be used, or it may be surface-treated with an oil agent, a silicone, an amino acid, or the like. Among these, silica, calcium carbonate, and barium sulfate are preferred, and silica is more preferred. These spherical powders can be used alone or by combining two or more types thereof. The size of the spherical powder is also not particularly limited, but the average particle diameter is 1 to 20 μm, preferably 3 to 10 μm. The average particle diameter is a value measured by electron microscopy or particle size distribution measurement with a laser diffraction/scattering method.


Since the composite powder of the invention is an alternative technique for plastic microbeads, the plate-like powder is not particularly limited as long as it is not a plastic. Examples thereof include titanium oxide, zirconium oxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, barium sulfate, calcium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, iron oxide, carbon black, chromium oxide, chromium hydroxide, prussian blue, ultramarine, red iron oxide, talc, mica, kaolin, sericite, muscovite, synthetic mica, phlogopite, lepidolite, biotite, lithia mica, silica, aluminum silicate, magnesium silicate, magnesium aluminum silicate, calcium silicate, barium silicate, strontium silicate, a tungstate metal salt, hydroxyapatite, vermiculite, Higilite, bentonite, montmorillonite, hectorite, zeolite, a ceramic powder, dicalcium phosphate, alumina, aluminum hydroxide, boron nitride, bismuth oxychloride, titanium oxide-coated mica, titanium oxide-tin oxide-coated synthetic phlogopite, zinc oxide-coated mica, barium sulfate-coated mica, a titanium oxide-coated glass powder, a glass powder, an aluminum powder, silk, cellulose, crystalline cellulose, starch, and lauroyl lysine, and these may be surface-treated with an oil agent, a silicone, an amino acid, or the like. Among these, talc, mica, synthetic mica, and boron nitride are preferred, and synthetic mica and boron nitride are more preferred. These plate-like powders can be used alone or by combining two or more types thereof.


The size of the plate-like powder is also not particularly limited, but the average particle diameter is 50 μm or less, preferably 1 to 20 μm. The aspect ratio of the plate-like powder is also not particularly limited, but is 2 to 200, preferably 10 to 200. The average particle diameter is a value measured by electron microscopy or particle size distribution measurement with a laser diffraction/scattering method. Further, the aspect ratio is a value obtained by dividing the major axis of the plate-like powder by the thickness, and is generally obtained from electron microscopy of the powder. For example, it can be calculated using the average value of 10 to 20 samples of electron micrographs.


The mass ratio of the spherical powder, the plate-like powder, and the oil agent in the composite powder of the invention is not particularly limited, but is, for example, 99.8/0.1/0.1 to 1/1/1, preferably 98/1/1 to 75/20/5.


The composite powder of the invention has texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement similar to those of plastic microbeads. Specifically, these are texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement of a powder of nylon, polyacrylate, polyethylene, polystyrene, polyurethane, organopolysiloxane, or the like.


In addition, the composite powder of the invention has a first principal component score of −4.5 or less, preferably −5.5 or less and a second principal component score of 7.5 or less, preferably 6.0 or less, each of which is obtained by a principal component analysis of results of a sensory evaluation test of texture described in Examples. The principal component analysis refers to an analytical method for extracting two explanatory components with the highest correlation among factors for each texture evaluation and the first principal component score refers to a numerical value obtained by substituting an individual texture evaluation value for a first principal component obtained by the principal component analysis, and the second principal component score refers to a value obtained by substituting an individual texture evaluation value for a second principal component obtained by the principal component analysis.


The composite powder of the invention can be produced, for example, by including the following steps (a) and (b), preferably in the order of steps (a) and (b), but a production method other than the following steps may be used as long as the composite powder of the invention can be produced:

    • (a) a step of mixing and heating an oil agent, a spherical powder, and a dispersion medium, thereby obtaining the spherical powder coated with the oil agent; and
    • (b) a step of stirring the spherical powder coated with the oil agent and a plate-like powder, thereby obtaining a composite powder in which the plate-like powder is adhered to the spherical powder coated with the oil agent.


In the step (a), first, an oil agent, a spherical powder, and a dispersion medium are placed in a container and mixed with a disper mixer, a planetary mixer, a Henschel mixer, or the like. This produces a slurry.


The dispersion medium is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include alcohols such as isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and ethanol, water, n-hexane, and isoparaffin. Among these dispersion media, alcohols are preferred, and isopropyl alcohol is more preferred. The amount of the dispersion medium is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, the same amount as that of the spherical powder.


After mixing, the resultant is heated. When heating, it is preferred to perform mixing using a disper mixer, a planetary mixer, a Henschel mixer, or the like. Although the heating temperature and time are not particularly limited, a temperature and a time suitable for evaporating the dispersion medium from the slurry are preferred, and are for example, 80° C. and 20 minutes or so when the dispersion medium is isopropyl alcohol. This coats the spherical powder with the oil agent.


In the step (b), the method of stirring the spherical powder coated with the oil agent and the plate-like powder is not particularly limited as long as the plate-like powder can be physically adhered to the spherical powder coated with the oil agent, and for example, a method capable of applying a physical force simultaneously with stirring such as a mortar, a jet mill, a ball mill, a bead mill, a pin mill, or a hammer mill is preferred. The stirring time is not particularly limited, but is 5 to 60 minutes, preferably 30 to 60 minutes.


After performing the steps (a) and (b), drying under reduced pressure, pulverization, classification, etc. may be further performed.


The composite powder of the invention can be used to replace plastic microbeads in a conventional cosmetic in which plastic microbeads are used. There is no need to incorporate plastic microbeads in the cosmetic containing the composite powder of the invention, and a cosmetic containing no plastic microbeads is formed, and therefore, the cosmetic has a low environmental impact. However, it goes without saying that the composite powder of the invention can be used in a cosmetic in combination with plastic microbeads.


Preferred examples of the cosmetic of the invention include makeup cosmetics such as a powder foundation, a liquid foundation, a blush, an eye shadow, and a lipstick that make use of the improvement of the texture, the light diffusing properties, and the like of the composite powder, and sunscreen cosmetics such as a sun care product and a base that make use of SPF enhancement.


Examples

Hereinafter, the invention will be described in detail with reference to Examples, but the invention is by no means limited to these Examples.


Examples 1 to 18 and Comparative Examples 1 to 15
Preparation of Composite Powder
(1) Examples 1 to 18

In accordance with the formulations shown in Table 1, composite powders of Examples 1 to 18 were prepared by the following production method.


A) A spherical powder (component (A)) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA: dispersion medium) of the same mass as that of the spherical powder are uniformly mixed.


B) An oil agent (component (C)) is added to A and uniformly mixed.


C) B was heated and mixed at 80° C. or higher, and IPA (dispersion medium) was volatilized until the slurry was converted into a powder form.


D) C was dried under reduced pressure, thereby obtaining the spherical powder coated with the oil agent.


E) The spherical powder coated with the oil agent and a plate-like powder (component (B)) are physically adhered to each other by grinding in a mortar for 30 minutes.


(2) Comparative Examples 1 to 3

In accordance with the formulations shown in Table 1, powders of Comparative Examples 1 to 4 were prepared by the following production method.


A) A spherical powder (component (A)) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA: dispersion medium) of the same mass as that of the spherical powder are uniformly mixed.


B) An oil agent (component (C)) is added to A and uniformly mixed.


C) B was heated and mixed at 80° C. or higher, and IPA (dispersion medium) was volatilized until the slurry was converted into a powder form.


D) C was dried under reduced pressure, thereby obtaining the spherical powder coated with the oil agent.


E) The spherical powder coated with the oil agent and a plate-like powder (component (B)) are physically adhered to each other by grinding in a mortar for 30 minutes.


(3) Comparative Examples 4 to 6

In accordance with the formulations shown in Table 1, powders of Comparative Examples 4 to 6 were prepared by the following production method.


A) A spherical powder (component (A)) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA: dispersion medium) of the same mass as that of the spherical powder are uniformly mixed.


B) An oil agent (component (C)) is added to A and uniformly mixed.


C) B was heated and mixed at 80° C. or higher, and IPA (dispersion medium) was volatilized until the slurry was converted into a powder form.


D) C was dried under reduced pressure, thereby obtaining the spherical powder coated with the oil agent.


(4) Comparative Example 14

In accordance with the formulation shown in Table 1, a powder of Comparative Example 14 was prepared by the following production method.


A) A spherical powder and a plate-like powder are uniformly mixed.


B) An oil agent is heated to 70° C. or higher and added to A.


C) B is mixed for 30 seconds with a mixer.


(5) Comparative Example 15

In accordance with the formulation shown in Table 1, a powder of Comparative Example 15 was prepared by the following production method.


A) A spherical powder and a plate-like powder are uniformly mixed.


B) B is mixed for 30 seconds with a mixer.


In Comparative Examples 7 to 13, a spherical powder (corresponding to plastic microbeads in Comparative Examples 7 to 10) was used as it was.




















TABLE 1











Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Example



Component

1
2
3
4
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
5







(A)
Iron oxide/titanium oxide-coated silica*1
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2




(average particle diameter: 6 μm)




Silica (average particle diameter: 5 μm)




Silica (average particle diameter: 4 μm)




Silicone-treated silica*2




(average particle diameter: 5 μm)




(HDI/trimethylolhexyllactone) crosspolymer




(average particle diameter: 15 μm)




Nylon-12 (average particle diameter: 12 μm)




Polymethyl methacrylate




(average particle diameter: 8 μm)




(Vinyl dimethicone/methicone silsesquioxane)




crosspolymer (average particle diameter: 5 μm)



(B)
Synthetic fluorophlogopite
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0




(average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 20)




Synthetic fluorophlogopite







10.0




(average particle diameter: 40 μm, aspect ratio: 90)




Boron nitride




(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 10)




Talc




(average particle diameter: 2 μm, aspect ratio: 4)




Mica




(average particle diameter: 10 μm, aspect ratio: 70)




Sericite




(average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 15)




Lauroyl lysine




(average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 38)




Mica




(average particle diameter: 42 μm, aspect ratio: 80)




Mica (average particle diameter: 18 μm, aspect




ratio: 150)




Amino acid-treated talc*3




(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 18)




Silicone-treated talc*4




(average particle diameter: 9 μm, aspect ratio: 50)



(C)
Dimer dilinoleyl bis(behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl)
1.8






1.8




dimer dilinoleate*5 (melting point: 40° C.)




Candelilla wax (melting point: 71° C.)

1.8




Dipentaerythrityl


1.8




hexa(hydroxystearate/stearate/rosinate)




(melting point: 37° C.)




Petrolatum (melting point: 50 to 60° C.)



1.8




Diisostearyl malate




1.8




Squalane





1.8




Cetyl ethylhexanoate






1.8




Total

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0



Total (A)

88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2



Total (B)

10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0



Total (C)

1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8



Evaluation
First principal component score (smooth-rough)
−7.29
−5.32
−5.56
−5.65
−4.14
−4.11
−4.20
−5.03




Second principal component score (wet-dry)
6.00
6.31
5.82
5.32
5.53
5.93
6.45
5.95

























Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example



Component

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14







(A)
Iron oxide/titanium oxide-coated silica*1
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2

88.2




(average particle diameter: 6 μm)




Silica (average particle diameter: 5 μm)




Silica (average particle diameter: 4 μm)







86.4




Silicone-treated silica*2




(average particle diameter: 5 μm)




(HDI/trimethylolhexyllactone) crosspolymer




(average particle diameter: 15 μm)




Nylon-12 (average particle diameter: 12 μm)




Polymethyl methacrylate




(average particle diameter: 8 μm)




(Vinyl dimethicone/methicone silsesquioxane)




crosspolymer (average particle diameter: 5 μm)



(B)
Synthetic fluorophlogopite




(average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 20)




Synthetic fluorophlogopite




(average particle diameter: 40 μm, aspect ratio: 90)




Boron nitride
10.0




(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 10)




Talc

10.0




(average particle diameter: 2 μm, aspect ratio: 4)




Mica


10.0




(average particle diameter: 10 μm, aspect ratio: 70)




Sericite



10.0




(average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 15)




Lauroyl lysine




10.0




(average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 38)




Mica





10.0




(average particle diameter: 42 μm, aspect ratio: 80)




Mica (average particle diameter: 18 μm, aspect






10.0




ratio: 150)




Amino acid-treated talc*3







10.0




(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 18)




Silicone-treated talc*4








10.0




(average particle diameter: 9 μm, aspect ratio: 50)



(C)
Dimer dilinoleyl bis(behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl)
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
3.6
1.8




dimer dilinoleate*5 (melting point: 40° C.)




Candelilla wax (melting point: 71° C.)




Dipentaerythrityl




hexa(hydroxystearate/stearate/rosinate)




(melting point: 37° C.)




Petrolatum (melting point: 50 to 60° C.)




Diisostearyl malate




Squalane




Cetyl ethylhexanoate












Total

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0



Total (A)

88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
88.2
86.4
88.2



Total (B)

10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0



Total (C)

1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
3.6
1.8



Evaluation
First principal component score (smooth-rough)
−5.77
−5.61
−6.61
−5.55
−4.84
−4.91
−5.87
−9.09
−9.42




Second principal component score (wet-dry)
5.69
5.48
6.48
6.05
4.73
6.39
5.99
5.16
5.40























Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative


Component

Example 4
15
16
17
18
Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example 8





(A)
Iron oxide/titanium oxide-coated silica*1
98.0



(average particle diameter: 6 μm)



Silica (average particle diameter: 5 μm)


88.2
73.4


98.0



Silica (average particle diameter: 4 μm)

86.4



96.0



Silicone-treated silica*2




87.3



(average particle diameter: 5 μm)



(HDI/trimethylolhexyllactone) crosspolymer







100.0



(average particle diameter: 15 μm)



Nylon-12 (average particle diameter: 12 μm)








100.0



Polymethyl methacrylate



(average particle diameter: 8 μm)



(Vinyl dimethicone/methicone silsesquioxane)



crosspolymer (average particle diameter: 5 μm)


(B)
Synthetic fluorophlogopite (average particle

10.0
10.0
8.3



diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 20)



Synthetic fluorophlogopite (average particle



diameter: 40 μm, aspect ratio: 90)



Boron nitride




10.0



(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 10)



Talc



(average particle diameter: 2 μm, aspect ratio: 4)



Mica (average particle diameter: 10 μm, aspect



ratio: 70)



Sericite (average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect



ratio: 15)



Lauroyl lysine (average particle diameter: 12 μm,



aspect ratio: 38)



Mica (average particle diameter: 42 μm, aspect



ratio: 80)



Mica (average particle diameter: 18 μm, aspect



ratio: 150)



Amino acid-treated talc*3



(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 18)



Silicone-treated talc*4



(average particle diameter: 9 μm, aspect ratio: 50)


(C)
Dimer dilinoleyl bis(behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl)
2.0
3.6
1.8
18.3
2.7
4.0
2.0



dimer dilinoleate*5 (melting point: 40° C.)



Candelilla wax (melting point: 71° C.)



Dipentaerythrityl



hexa(hydroxystearate/stearate/rosinate)



(melting point: 37° C.)



Petrolatum (melting point: 50 to 60° C.)



Diisostearyl malate



Squalane



Cetyl ethylhexanoate











Total

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0


Total(A)

98.0
86.4
88.2
73.4
87.3
96.0
98.0
100.0
100.0


Total(B)

0.0
10.0
10.0
8.3
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


Total(C)

2.0
3.6
1.8
18.3
2.7
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0


Evaluation
First principal component score (smooth-rough)
−1.68
−8.79
−5.56
−6.10
−8.99
−4.39
−4.86
−6.59
−7.41



Second principal component score (wet-dry)
6.70
5.40
7.32
5.93
5.89
6.93
8.50
6.07
5.97






















Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative



Component

Example 9
Example 10
Example 11
Example 12
Example 13
Example 14
Example 15







(A)
Iron oxide/titanium oxide-coated silica*1


100.0


88.2
90.0




(average particle diameter: 6 μm)




Silica (average particle diameter: 5 μm)



100.0




Silica (average particle diameter: 4 μm)




100.0




Silicone-treated silica*2




(average particle diameter: 5 μm)




(HDI/trimethylolhexyllactone) crosspolymer




(average particle diameter: 15 μm)




Nylon-12 (average particle diameter: 12 μm)




Polymethyl methacrylate
100.0




(average particle diameter: 8 μm)




(Vinyl dimethicone/methicone silsesquioxane)

100.0




crosspolymer (average particle diameter: 5 μm)



(B)
Synthetic fluorophlogopite (average particle





10.0
10.0




diameter: 12 μm, aspect ratio: 20)




Synthetic fluorophlogopite (average particle




diameter: 40 μm, aspect ratio: 90)




Boron nitride




(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 10)




Talc




(average particle diameter: 2 μm, aspect ratio: 4)




Mica (average particle diameter: 10 μm, aspect




ratio: 70)




Sericite (average particle diameter: 12 μm, aspect




ratio: 15)




Lauroyl lysine (average particle diameter: 12 μm,




aspect ratio: 38)




Mica (average particle diameter: 42 μm, aspect




ratio: 80)




Mica (average particle diameter: 18 μm, aspect




ratio: 150)




Amino acid-treated talc*3




(average particle diameter: 6 μm, aspect ratio: 18)




Silicone-treated talc*4




(average particle diameter: 9 μm, aspect ratio: 50)



(C)
Dimer dilinoleyl bis(behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl)





1.8




dimer dilinoleate*5 (melting point: 40° C.)




Candelilla wax (melting point: 71° C.)




Dipentaerythrityl




hexa(hydroxystearate/stearate/rosinate)




(melting point: 37° C.)




Petrolatum (melting point: 50 to 60° C.)




Diisostearyl malate




Squalane




Cetyl ethylhexanoate










Total

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0



Total(A)

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
88.2
90.0



Total(B)

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
10.0



Total(C)

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0



Evaluation
First principal component score (smooth-rough)
−7.86
−10.35
−2.40
−5.22
−7.63
−4.26
−0.38




Second principal component score (wet-dry)
6.33
5.38
6.95
7.58
7.79
6.56
7.11







*1RonaFlair Flawless (Merck Performance Materials)



*2SA-SB-300 (Miyoshi Kasei)



*3NAI-talc JA-13R (Miyoshi Kasei)



*4SA-talc JA-46R (Miyoshi Kasei)



*5Plandool-G (Nippon Fine Chemical)






Texture Evaluation

The texture evaluation of the composite powders of Examples 1 to 18 and the powders of Comparative Examples 1 to 15 obtained above was performed according to the following method using the evaluation sheet shown in FIG. 3 by a panel of 7 cosmetic specialists. This result is also shown in Table 1.


Evaluation Method

The powder prepared above was randomly touched in a blind manner and evaluated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7 using the SD method with respect to the following 10 items: “dry”, “coarse”, “slippery”, “silky”, “smooth”, “rough”, “slick”, “slimy”, “flaky”, and “moist”, and a principal component analysis was performed based on the average value of the evaluation scores given by 7 specialists.


The principal component analysis was performed using the average score of the evaluation results of each sample. The cumulative contribution ratios of the first principal component and the second principal component obtained were 86%, which indicates that the two components have a sufficient explanatory power. The powders corresponding to plastic microbeads (Comparative Examples 7 to 10) had a first principal component score of −4.5 or less and a second principal component score of 7.5 or less, and all the Examples of the invention fell within the ranges (that is, the texture was equivalent to that of plastic microbeads). On the other hand, in the case of the spherical powder only coated with the oil agent, the non-composite powder, or the simply mixed powder, the scores did not fall within the ranges.


The principal component analysis is a known method that is also used in JP6868468B, JP6667607B, JP6879276B, JP6617767B, and the like. Specifically, when the principal component analysis is performed according to the description in [0036] to [0048] in JP6868468B, the method is as follows.


First, a principal component u is represented by the following formula 1. Here, the principal component u becomes a small number of characteristic variables representing the characteristics of a data group from multivariate data (also referred to as synthetic variables).


[Math. 1]





u
i
=a
1
x
1,i
+a
2
x
2,i
+ . . . +a
n−1
x
n−1,i
+a
n
x
n,i   formula 1


Provided that n is the number of variables (the number of evaluation items in the present application), i is a natural number, x is the data of each variable (score of each evaluation item), a1, a2, . . . an−1, and an are the coefficients of the principal component.


The coefficients of the principal component a1, a2, . . . an−1, and an are obtained so that the variance of the principal component u is maximized. However, the coefficients of the principal component satisfy the relationship of the following formula 2.


[Math. 2]





a
1
2
+a
2
2
+ . . . +a
n−1
2
+a
n
2=1   formula 2


In order to obtain the coefficients of the principal component a1, a2, . . . an−1, and an, first, the variance/covariance matrix of the original data group is calculated, and the eigenvalue of the problem variance/covariance matrix is solved. Eigenvectors that are solutions of the eigenvalue problem correspond to the coefficients a1, a2, . . . an−1, and an. In addition, the obtained principal components are n sets (10 sets of the number of evaluation items in the present application), and are called a first principal component, a second principal component, and an nth principal component in descending order of the eigenvalue, and in the present application, the first principal component and the second principal component are used.


It is possible to ascertain the texture characteristics of the powder raw material by obtaining the principal component score using the eigenvector obtained from the principal component analysis by a known method as described above.


The first principal component score was calculated according to such a known method as follows: “first principal component score=“dry” scoreדdry” first principal component eigenvector+“flaky” scoreדflaky” first principal component eigenvector+“rough” scoreדrough” first principal component eigenvector+“coarse” scoreדcoarse” first principal component eigenvector+“slippery” scoreדslippery” first principal component eigenvector+“silky” scoreדsilky” first principal component eigenvector+“slick” scoreדslick” first principal component eigenvector+“smooth” scoreדsmooth” first principal component eigenvector+“slimy” scoreדslimy” first principal component eigenvector+“moist” scoreדmoist” first principal component eigenvector”.


Here, the first principal component score is the sum of the product of the eigenvector of each evaluation item obtained by the principal component analysis and the score of each evaluation item. Further, the second principal component score was calculated in the same manner as the first principal component score.


In the present application, the powder is evaluated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7 using the SD method with respect to the following 10 items: “dry”, “coarse”, “slippery”, “silky”, “smooth”, “rough”, “slick”, “slimy”, “flaky”, and “moist”, and the principal component analysis is performed based on the average value of the evaluation scores given by 7 specialists. In this principal component analysis, “First principal component score (smooth-rough)” and “Second principal component score (wet-dry)” are described in the evaluation columns in Tables 1-1 and 1-2, and this indicates that the first principal component is highly correlated with “smooth”, “slick”, “coarse”, and “rough” associated with the evaluation of smooth-rough of the powder, and the second principal component is highly correlated with “dry” and “moist” associated with the evaluation of wet-dry of the powder.


Exterior Photograph

An electron micrograph of the composite powder of Example 1 obtained above is shown in FIG. 1, and an electron micrograph of the composite powder of Example 6 is shown in FIG. 2. The composite powders were powders in which a plate-like powder is partially adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent.


The composite powders of the invention were all powders in which a plate-like powder is adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent.


Example 19 and Comparative Examples 16 to 18

Powder foundation


Powder foundations were prepared according to the following production method using the formulation shown in the following Table 2.


A) 1 to 14 are mixed with a mixer.


B) 15 to 18 are melted by heating and uniformly mixed.


C) B is added to A and mixed with a mixer.


D) C is pulverized, filled into a container, and then molded.
















TABLE 2









Example
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative



Raw material name

19
Example 16
Example 17
Example 18






















1
NAI-talc JA-46R
Amino acid-treated talc
42.5
42.5
42.5
42.5



(Miyoshi Kasei)


2
Powder base L
Zinc laurate
5
5
5
5



(NOF)


3
RonaFlair Boroneige SF-6
Boron nitride
15
15
15
15



(Merck Performance



Materials)


4
RonaFlair SynMica M
Synthetic fluorophlogopite
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5



(Merck Performance



Materials)


5
plate barium sulfate HM
Barium sulfate
10
10
10
10



(Sakai Chemical Industry)


6
SA-titanium CR-50
Silicone-treated titanium oxide
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2



(Miyoshi Kasei)


7
SA-yellow LL-100P
Silicone-treated yellow iron oxide
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6



(Miyoshi Kasei)


8
SA-red R-516PS
Silicone-treated red iron oxide
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8



(Miyoshi Kasei)


9
SA-black BL-100P
Silicone-treated black iron oxide
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4



(Miyoshi Kasei)


10

Composite powder of Example 1
6


11

Composite powder of Comparative

6




Example 4


12
RonaFlair Flawless
Iron oxide/titanium oxide-coated silica


6
5.29



(Merck Performance
(average particle diameter: 6 μm)



Materials)


13

Synthetic fluorophlogopite (average particle



0.6




diameter: 12 μm)


14
Plandool-G
Dimer dilinoleyl



0.11



(Nippon Fine Chemical)
bis(behenyl/isostearyl/phytosteryl) dimer




dilinoleate


15
DOWSIL SH 200 C Fluid
Dimethicone
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8



100 cSt



(Dow Toray)


16
FineNeo-IOTG
Triethylhexanoin
1
1
1
1



(Nippon Fine Chemical)


17
squalane
Squalane
2
2
2
2


18
Plandool-H
(Phytosteryl/isostearyl/cetyl/stearyl/behenyl)
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2



(Nippon Fine Chemical)
dimer dilinolate







Total

100
100
100
100



Spreadability upon application

A
D
C
C



Smoothness upon application

A
D
D
D



Moist texture upon application

A
C
D
D



Wrinkle blurring effect

A
C
C
C









Usability Evaluation

A panel of 5 cosmetic specialists was asked to use these powder foundations and evaluate spreadability upon application, smoothness upon application, a moist texture after application, and a wrinkle blurring effect to score 1 point in the case of being evaluated as poor and to score 5 points in the case of being evaluated as good. The average score of the panel was calculated and determined according to the determination criteria shown below. This result is also shown in Table 2.


Determination Criteria
















[Average Score]
[Determination]









4.5 or more:
A



3.5 or more and less than 4.5:
B



2 or more and less than 3.5:
C



Less than 2:
D










The obtained powder foundation had excellent spreadability, smoothness, and moist texture upon application, and had a good wrinkle blurring effect.


Example 20 and Comparative Example 19
Sun Care Product

Sun care products were prepared according to the following production method using the formulation shown in the following Table 3.


A) 1 to 4 are heated and uniformly mixed.


B) 5 to 8 are uniformly mixed with a homomixer (5000 rpm, 3 minutes) .


C) 9 to 12 are uniformly mixed.


D) B is added to A and uniformly mixed.


E) C is gradually added to D and emulsified with a homomixer (5000 rpm, 3 minutes)


F) 13 to 14 are added to E and uniformly mixed.












TABLE 3







Example
Comparative



20
Example 19




















1
Uvinul A Plus B
Diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate, ethylhexyl
3.00
3.00



(BASF)
methoxycinnamate


2
Tinosorb S
Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine
0.50
0.50



(BASF)


3
Uvinul MC 80 N
Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate
1.50
1.50



(BASF)


4
FineNeo-iPSE
Diisopropyl sebacate
20.00
20.00



(Nippon Fine Chemical)


5
PolyAquol OS2
Polyglyceryl-2 oleate, polyhydroxystearic acid,
3.00
3.00



(Innovacos)
polyglyceryl-2 stearate


6
BENTONE GEL ISD V
Disteardimonium hectorite, isododecane, propylene
6.00
6.00



(Elementis)
carbonate


7

Isododecane
22.20
22.20


8
DOWSIL VM-2270
Silica silylate
1.00
1.00



Aerogel Fine Particle



(Dow Toray)


9

Water
19.00
22.00


10

BG
5.00
5.00


11

Sodium chloride
0.30
0.30


12
PHENOXETOL
Phenoxyethanol
0.50
0.50



(Clariant Japan)


13

Composite powder of Example 1
3.00


14
DIF-OP-3W
Zinc oxide, hydrated silica, hydrogen dimethicone,
10.00
10.00



(Sakai Chemical Industry)
ethylhexyl palmitate, polyhydroxystearic acid


15
DIS-OP-10A
Titanium oxide, hydrated silica, aluminum hydroxide,
5.00
5.00



(Sakai Chemical Industry)
hydrogen dimethicone, ethylhexyl palmitate,




polyhydroxystearic acid





Total

100.00
100.00



Spreadability upon

A
C



application



Smoothness upon

A
D



application



SPF(In vitro)

95.3
81.8









Usability Evaluation

These sun care products were evaluated for spreadability upon application and smoothness upon application in the same manner as in the above Examples, and further, SPF was measured by the following method. These results are also shown in Table 3.


SPF Measurement Method

These sun care products were applied to an acrylic resin (PMMA) plate, dried, and then measured at five given sites in a sample on the PMMA plate using an SPF analyzer (Labsphere UV-2000S, manufactured by Labsphere, Inc.), and the average value was calculated.


The obtained sun care product had excellent spreadability and smoothness upon application, and had a good SPF enhancing effect.


Example 21
Liquid Foundation

A liquid foundation was prepared according to the following production method using the formulation shown in the following Table 4.


A) 1 to 5 are kneaded with a roll mill.


B) 6 to 11 are uniformly mixed.


C) 12 to 15 are uniformly mixed.


D) A and B are uniformly mixed.


E) C is gradually added to D and emulsified with a homomixer (5000 rpm, 3 minutes).












TABLE 4







Raw material name
Example 21



















1
SA-titanium CR-50
Silicone-treated titanium oxide
7.20



(Miyoshi Kasei)


2
SA-yellow LL-100P
Silicone-treated yellow iron oxide
1.60



(Miyoshi Kasei)


3
SA-red R-516PS
Silicone-treated red iron oxide
0.80



(Miyoshi Kasei)


4
SA-black BL-100P
Silicone-treated black iron oxide
0.40



(Miyoshi Kasei)


5
DOWSIL ES-5612 Formulation Aid
PEG-10 dimethicone
3.00



(Dow Toray)


6
DOWSIL 5200 Formulation Aid
Lauryl PEG/PPG-18/18 methicone
2.00



(Dow Toray)


7
BENTONE GEL VS-5 PC V HV
Disteardimonium hectorite,
8.00



(Elementis)
cyclopentasiloxane, propylene carbonate


8
DOWSIL SH 245 Fluid
Cyclopentasiloxane
29.00



(Dow Toray)


9
FineNeo-CIO
Cetyl ethylhexanoate
10.00



(Nippon Fine Chemical)


10
DOWSIL EP-9215 Cosmetic Powder
(Dimethicone/vinyl dimethicone)
1.00



(Dow Toray)
crosspolymer


11

Composite powder of Example 1
2.00


12

Water
29.00


13

BG
5.00


14

Sodium chloride
0.50


15
PHENOXETOL
Phenoxyethanol
0.50



(Clariant Japan)





Total

100.00









The obtained liquid foundation had excellent spreadability and smoothness upon application and had a good wrinkle blurring effect.


Example 22
Lipstick

A lipstick was prepared according to the following production method using the formulation shown in the following Table 5.


A) 1 to 12 are melted by heating to 90° C. or higher and uniformly mixed.


B) 13 to 17 are added to A and uniformly mixed and dispersed.


C) B is melted by heating to 90° C. or higher, poured into a mold, and cooled to 5° C.


D) The resultant is loaded into a stick-like container.











TABLE 5







Example 22



















1

Diisostearyl malate
21.80


2

Squalane
20.00


3
Plandool-H
(Phytosteryl/isostearyl/cetyl/stearyl/behenyl)
10.00



(Nippon Fine Chemical)
dimer dilinolate


4

Isotridecyl isononanoate
15.55


5

Hydrogenated polyisobutene
10.00


6
Fine Neo-MCT
Caprylic/capric triglyceride
5.00



(Nippon Fine Chemical)


7
Plandool-LG2
Di(phytosteryl/octyldodecyl)
5.00



(Nippon Fine Chemical)
lauroyl glutamate


8

Polyethylene
2.00


9

Microcrystalline wax
4.00


10

Paraffin
3.00


11
PHENOXETOL
Phenoxyethanol
0.10



(Clariant Japan)


12
Nipagin M
Methylparaben
0.10



(Clariant Japan)


13

Polymethyl methacrylate
1.00


14

Composite powder of Example 1
2.00


15

Red 201
0.20


16

Red 202
0.20


17

Yellow 4
0.05



Total

100.00









The obtained lipstick had excellent spreadability and smoothness upon application, and had a good wrinkle blurring effect.


Industrial Applicability

The composite powder of the invention has texture, light diffusing properties, and an effect such as SPF enhancement similar to those of plastic microbeads, and therefore can be used to replace plastic microbeads in a conventional cosmetic in which plastic microbeads are used.

Claims
  • 1. A composite powder characterized in that a plate-like powder is adhered to a spherical powder coated with an oil agent.
  • 2. The composite powder according to claim 1, wherein the spherical powder has an average particle diameter of 1 to 20 μm.
  • 3. The composite powder according to claim 1, wherein the plate-like powder has an average particle diameter of 50 μm or less and an aspect ratio of 2 to 200.
  • 4. The composite powder according to claim 1, wherein the oil agent is one type or two or more types selected from semi-solid oil agents and solid oil agents at ordinary temperature.
  • 5. The composite powder according to claim 1, wherein the oil agent is one type or two or more types selected from semi-solid oil agents and solid oil agents at ordinary temperature, the spherical powder has an average particle diameter of 1 to 20 μm, and the plate-like powder has an average particle diameter of 50 μm or less.
  • 6. The composite powder according claim 1, wherein a mass ratio of the spherical powder, the plate-like powder, and the oil agent is 99.8/0.1/0.1 to 1/1/1.
  • 7. A cosmetic characterized by comprising the composite powder according to claim 1.
  • 8. The cosmetic according to claim 7 which does not contain plastic microbeads.
  • 9. A method for producing a composite powder characterized by comprising the following steps: mixing and heating an oil agent, a spherical powder, and a dispersion medium, thereby obtaining the spherical powder coated with the oil agent; andstirring the spherical powder coated with the oil agent and a plate-like powder, thereby obtaining a composite powder in which the plate-like powder is adhered to the spherical powder coated with the oil agent.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2021-060853 Mar 2021 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2022/014232 3/25/2022 WO