The present invention relates to a composite profile, in particular a heat-insulating composite profile, for windows, doors, facades or skylights. The invention also relates to a method for producing such a composite profile.
Prior art profiles, such as the profile disclosed in DE 25 52 700 and shown in
The composite profile is produced by first orienting the metal profiles relative to each other so that the receiving grooves for the insulating profile face each other. The insulating profiles are then pushed or inserted into the receiving grooves and later aligned with each other in a mounting device and tensioned, with the tensioning forces applied to the outside surfaces. The composite is fixed by plastically forming projections on the insulating profile.
The projections can be formed in the mounting device by either moving the profile past the device or by guiding the device across the stationary profile for forming the projections.
The construction depth of the composite profile of this type is calculated by adding the construction depths of the sequentially arranged individual elements, first metal profile, insulating profile and second metal profile. Conventional profiles have therefore a construction depth with a manufacturing tolerance which is the sum of the manufacturing tolerances of the individual elements. Details of the tolerance budget of the profile of
The tolerances of the metal and plastic profiles cannot be reduced below certain minimum tolerances governed by manufacturing conditions—typically, relatively complex technical processes, such as extrusion molding of the metal profiles and extrusion of the plastic profiles (insulating profile), are selected—, which already causes a significant increase in the manufacturing cost of the profiles. Accordingly, relatively large variations results when the tolerances of the individual components are added which in practice can amount to a total tolerance g=±0.7 mm. The alignment tolerances mentioned above have also to be added; these are, however, typically rather small and may even approach zero.
The heat-insulating composite profiles for windows, doors and facades are assembled into frames or crossbar/post constructions, wherein the profiles are mitered or butt-joined. The large tolerances of the various assembled profiles cause different problems. For example, large tolerances can result in an irregular visual appearance. The tolerances can also produce sharp edges where the profiles intersect, which can cause injury during operation or cleaning. In addition to these effects, the tolerances also create technical problems when the profiles are joined or mechanically finished, for example, during sawing or milling for installing fittings and accessories, and lead to poor functionality of the completed elements (for example, leaks, binding, etc.).
It would therefore be desirable and advantageous to obviate prior art shortcomings and to reduce the total tolerance of the composite profile and to relax limitations in the tolerances of the individual profiles.
The invention is directed to a composite profile, in particular a heat-insulating composite profile for windows, doors, facades and skylights, wherein a gap is formed between the groove bottom of the at least one receiving groove for an insulating profile and the least one plastic and/or insulating profile.
According to one aspect of the invention, a composite profile includes at least one metal profile with an outer side and at least one receiving groove disposed opposite the outer side and having a groove bottom and projections oriented at an angle to the groove bottom, and at least one insulating profile having a base section received in the at least one receiving groove and a second opposing section, with a gap being formed between the groove bottom and the base section of the at least one insulating profile. The outer side of the at least one metal profile and the second section the at least one insulating profile or the other side of a second of the at least one metal profiles are spaced apart from each other by a predetermined distance, wherein the at least one metal profile is fixed in position relative to the insulating profile by a press fit between the projections and the at least one insulating profile.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method for producing a composite profile includes the steps of providing at least one metal profile having at least one receiving groove with a groove bottom and projections oriented at an angle to the groove bottom, and at least one insulating profile; inserting the at least one insulating profile into the receiving groove of the at least one metal profile; placing a resilient element between the at least one metal profile and the at least one insulating profile; aligning the at least one metal profile and the at least one insulating profile relative to each other in a mounting device so that opposing outer sides of the at least one metal profile and the at least one insulating profile are spaced apart from each other by a nominal distance, and urging the at least one metal profile against guide elements of the mounting device so as to press the projections against the at least one insulating profile and to thereby fix the position of the at least one metal profile relative to the at least one insulating profile.
In the process for producing the composite profile, the outer surfaces of the metal profile are hence maintained by the mounting device at the nominal distance G. The position assumed by the insulating profiles inside the receiving grooves is then fixed and frozen, for example simply by holding the projections in place by a press fit. In this way, the overall tolerance relative to the nominal distance G of the composite profile reaches a value which corresponds essentially to the tolerance of the mounting device, while the individual tolerances of the metal profiles and insulating profile need not be limited beyond the state of the art. Indeed, the tolerances can even be increased which simplifies the manufacturing process of the individual profiles and reduces the cost significantly.
Preferably, at least one spring elements and/or an elastically compressible element are arranged and/or formed between the at least one metal profile and the at least one insulating profile, with the element being formed preferably as a single piece with or separate from the at least one metal profile and the at least one insulating profile. According to one embodiment, the elastically compressible element can also be arranged in the at least one gap and can fill the gap either partially or completely. The dimensions of the spring element should be selected so that it urges the insulating profile and the metal profile apart so that the outer sides make contact with or abut the mounting device. Like the elastically compressible element, the spring element can also fill the gap either partially or completely.
The invention is suitable for any type of composite profile wherein at least one plastic profile and one metal profile—in particular made of light metal such as aluminum or an aluminum alloy, but also steel—can be joined to a composite profile.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent upon reading the following description of currently preferred exemplified embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
Throughout all the Figures, same or corresponding elements are generally indicated by same reference numerals.
It should be noted that the base sections 9 are formed with an offset relative to the principal plane of the insulating profiles between the two metal profiles 1, 2 and are approximately parallel to the principal plane, thereby forming a shoulder 3″ which is located essentially directly in the plane defined by the projection 7 of the receiving groove 4. Pressing forces in the direction of the plane of the insulating projections 3 are hence not directed away via the end face of the projections 7 and the insulating profile 3, but rather through their base sections 9.
The base sections 9 of the insulating sections thereby prevent the insulating projections 3 from coming out of the receiving grooves, with additional safety provided by a press fit of the insulating projection 3 in the receiving groove 4. The press fit is implemented by forming or pressing the outer projections 7 against the insulating projections when the insulating projections 3 are inserted in the receiving grooves 4. Alternatively (not shown), inner projections can be formed instead of the outer projections.
The insulating profile of
The projections 7 can be formed by a mounting device, whereby either the composite profile is moved through the device or the device is guided over the stationary profile for forming the projections 7.
The construction depth G is calculated as the sum of a sequentially arranged construction depths of the individual elements, first metal profile 1 (construction depth A), insulating profile 3 (construction depth C) and second metal profile 2 (construction depth B). It therefore holds
G=A+B+C.
In this conventional device, the construction depth G of the profile is determined in that the base front edges of the insulating profiles 3 contact the groove bottom 4′ of the receiving grooves 4. In this design, the practically unavoidable deviations of the individual profiles 1, 2, 3 from their nominal values together with the tolerance of the mounting device disadvantageously add up to a total tolerance, which can be written as:
g=a+b+c+vt,
wherein:
This results in a conventional construction depth G in which the individual tolerances a, b, c, vt are added.
The device tolerance vt of the mounting device is relatively small compared to the individual tolerances of the insulating profiles 1, 2, 3. The following approximation therefore holds:
g˜a+b+c.
The individual tolerances a, b, c are obtained by adding the maximum positive tolerances +a1, +b1, +c1 and the negative tolerances −a2, −b2, −c2. The same process applies to the total tolerance g.
The following relations hold for the maximum positive deviation +g1 and the maximum negative deviation −g2:
+g1=a1+b1+c1
−g2=−a2−b2−c2.
As mentioned before, the values of +g1 and −g2 can reach 0.7 mm.
Referring now to
The maximum gap width is reached when all individual components have the maximum negative tolerance, since the sum of the gap spacings s1+s2 of the gaps S1+S2 is the sum of all actually occurring positive and negative tolerances (sum of the clearance spaces).
In the event that the individual components are all located in the maximum positive tolerance region, the sum of the gap spacings s1+s2 of the gaps S1+S2 approaches zero. However, an additional (minimum) gap can be provided which can exist even if all positive tolerances have been exhausted.
As a result, a total construction depth is obtained which is independent of the individual tolerances and only influenced by the tolerances vt of the mounting device i.e., approaches zero when the mounting device tolerance is negligible.
It is a prerequisite for carrying out the method that the insulating profile 8, preferably the base section 9 of the insulating profile, is moveable in receiving groove 4 relative to the metal profiles 1, 2 in the direction of the construction depth G by a distance which corresponds to half the maximum negative tolerance −g2.
This means that the insulating profile base section 9 generally makes contact only with a surface 10, 20 and/or 11 which extends parallel to the X-plane of the undercut 7′. A corresponding gap 12 is provided in a region of the formfitting undercut of the insulating profile base 9.
The assembly process for the composite profile will now be described.
In the method for producing the composite profile, the mutually parallel outer surfaces 5 and 6 of the profiles 1 and 2 have to be held at a nominal distance G by a mounting device. A mounting device where the profiles are stationary can employ tensioning devices. The position assumed by the insulating profile 8 within the receiving grooves 4 is then permanently fixed in position by forming the projections 7 by a press fit. In this way, the total tolerance G of the composite profile reaches a value which is essentially equal to the tolerance of the mounting device.
If a composite profile passes through a stationary mounting device, then the surfaces 5 and 6 of the metal profile shells 1 and 2 have to be pressed against the guide rollers and/or guide surfaces of the mounting device for forming the projections 7. This can be, for example, easily accomplished by guide rollers which engage with projections disposed on the outside, or by an elastic spring element 13 (see
In the two aforedescribed methods, the insulating profiles 8 assume an arbitrary position in the receiving groove 4 which can result in two different gap distances s1, s2 on the same insulating profile 8.
Two resilient elements 14a, 14b can be used to equalize the gap distances s1, s2 of the opposing gaps S1, S2 in an intermediate position between the metal profiles 1, 2, wherein the resilient elements 14a, 14b are arranged between the metal profile 1 and the insulating profile 8 and between the metal profile 2 and the insulating profile 8, respectively, in the present embodiment essentially between the front face of the projection 7 and the shoulder 8″ of the insulating profile. The resilient elements 14 not only center the insulating profile relative to the two metal profiles 1, 2, but also urge the two metal profiles 1, 2 a part, so that these make contact with their outer surfaces or outer edges 5, 6 with the boundary of the mounting device. A separate spring element 13 or another means in the device for urging the two metal profiles apart is therefore no longer required. The resilient elements 14 on the insulating profile 8 therefore replace the function of a spring element 13 and/or special holding devices for the metal profiles 1 and 2 on the mounting device, which provides the particularly simple and advantageous solution of the invention.
When passing through the mounting device, the resilient elements 14 are compressed, thereby exerting a restoring force on the metal profiles 1, 2 which ensures contact between the metal profiles 1 and 2 and the mounting device itself.
The resilient element 14 is preferably made of plastic and is designed so as to provide elastic or shape resiliency. Accordingly, it has a harder consistency than the sealing elements 16 and 17. The sealing elements 16 and 17 can be mechanically connected to the resilient element 14 as a single piece by co-extrusion, gluing or in other ways. The sealing elements 16 and 17 have a softer consistency which is (preferably exclusively) suitable for sealing purposes.
For example, the resilient element 14 can be made of a rubber-like substance, such as APTK, silicone and the like with a Shore hardness of approximately 60, whereas the sealing elements 16 and 17 made in one piece have a smaller Shore hardness for the special purpose of sealing.
In the embodiment according to
The aforedescribed embodiments of
The insulating profiles are made of a poorly heat conducting plastic, in particular polyamide, PVC and like, wherein the resilient elements are inserted preferably in grooves or recesses on the insulating profile (or alternatively on the metal profile). The grooves can hold the resilient elements in formfitting or force engagement. The resilient elements can also be easily arranged as a single piece on the insulating rails by co-extrusion, gluing and the like. The form of the resilient elements 14, . . . is not limited to the illustrated embodiments.
The resilient elements can also be formed as a single piece with the insulating rail and (or of the same material—e.g., in form of resilient sections in a one-piece construction with the insulating profile), whereby the consistency of the resilient elements regarding their hardness and compressibility can be different.
The
The features described above also apply to profiles where the inner projections 7, 7b or 24 are formed (e.g., pressed, rolled) instead of the outer profile projections 7 and where the resilient elements 29, 30, 31 are arranged on the metal profiles 1, 2 either as one piece or separately (not shown).
The following should be noted with respect to the tolerances. Typically, so-called theoretical nominal dimensions are taken into account when measuring components, which are indicated in
The clearance space can have, for example, the nominal dimensions as an upper or lower limit; in this case, the entire clearance space has either negative or positive values.
The nominal dimensions can also represent a value within the clearance space, so that the nominal dimensions can be exceeded in the positive or negative direction.
In the present situation, in particular relating to
For these cases, new nominal dimensions C and/or A and B are obtained.
The width of the gap S does not have to be set to a minimum value of zero. A minimum gap width s(min) can be defined, to which in an extreme case the clearance spaces of the three individual components have to be added resulting in a total gap width s(max).
In summary, the invention improves in a simple manner the connection technique for the profiles through a suitable design and a corresponding fabrication method in which the tolerances of the individual components no longer affect (or at least only to a small degree) the total construction depth G of the profile, without significantly changing the outer appearance of the composite profile for a viewer. The nominal dimension of the entire composite profile can be modified by a simple design change in the connecting region between the plastic and metal profiles, without the need to change the nominal dimensions of the individual elements of the profile.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in connection with currently preferred embodiments shown and described in detail, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown since various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and practical application to thereby enable a person skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims and their equivalents:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 15 986 | Mar 2000 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of prior filed copending PCT International application no. PCT/EP01/03396, filed Mar. 26, 2001, which was not published in English and which designated the United States and on which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. §120, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application claims the priority of German Patent Application Serial No. 100 15 986.9, filed Mar. 31, 2000, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(a)–(d), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3393487 | Nolan | Jul 1968 | A |
3517472 | Toth | Jun 1970 | A |
3925953 | LaBorde | Dec 1975 | A |
4069631 | Nahr | Jan 1978 | A |
4158512 | Hasselbacher | Jun 1979 | A |
4164830 | Bierlich | Aug 1979 | A |
4333295 | Janke | Jun 1982 | A |
4461133 | Laroche | Jul 1984 | A |
4524112 | Willert | Jun 1985 | A |
4614062 | Sperr | Sep 1986 | A |
4642870 | Schulz | Feb 1987 | A |
4704839 | Kay | Nov 1987 | A |
5117601 | Habicht | Jun 1992 | A |
5469683 | McKenna et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
6035596 | Brunnhofer | Mar 2000 | A |
6202353 | Giacomelli | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6397551 | Lewcock et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6668500 | Lamberts | Dec 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
21 30 496 | Dec 1972 | DE |
G 75 07 260 | Jan 1976 | DE |
28 21 096 | Nov 1979 | DE |
25 52 700 | Jun 1980 | DE |
29 08 950 | Sep 1980 | DE |
26 60 436 | May 1981 | DE |
G 78 21 041 | May 1982 | DE |
33 19 262 | May 1984 | DE |
32 29 230 | Jun 1984 | DE |
32 45 078 | Jun 1984 | DE |
30 33 206 | Jul 1984 | DE |
33 42 700 | Jan 1985 | DE |
30 35 526 | Apr 1985 | DE |
34 40 710 | May 1986 | DE |
28 26 874 | Jul 1986 | DE |
35 14 538 | Aug 1986 | DE |
36 03 507 | Aug 1987 | DE |
33 30 391 | Jul 1990 | DE |
33 00 599 | Aug 1994 | DE |
196 43 681 | Apr 1998 | DE |
0 103 272 | Mar 1984 | EP |
2 058 893 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2 083 116 | Mar 1982 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030019184 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP01/03396 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10256385 | US |