The present invention relates to sound barriers, such as sound-absorbing walls.
In recent years, state highway commissions or transportation departments have promulgated noise level standards for highways passing through urban neighborhoods. As population densities in urban areas increase, it is a virtual certainty that residential neighborhoods will be adjacent a high speed throughway. Even in suburban areas, the desire for ready access to highways and interstates prompts residential development in close proximity to these roads.
Highway noise can greatly impact quality of life for the nearby residents. The federal Environmental Protection Agency has determined that noise levels above 66 decibels are unsafe for residential areas, while 72 dB is the limit for commercial environments. It has been suggested that high decibel levels along the highways may be linked to hearing loss, high blood pressure, irritability, ulcers, and heartburn, among other ailments. A standard pickup truck at 50 mph produces noise at 70 dB, while a medium truck is twice as loud at 80 dB. A motorcycle can reach 90 dB, which is four times louder than the pickup truck.
Highway noise is not only a function of the inherent noisiness of each vehicle. For instance, highway noise doubles when the traffic increases from 200 vehicles per hour to 2000 vehicles per hour, or when traffic speed increases from 30 mph to 65 mph. A single semi-trailer truck at 55 mph produces as much noise as ten cars at the same speed. It is not hard to see that highway noise in densely populated urban environments can quickly become unbearable.
Many approaches have been devised to address the problem of road noise. Some noise abatement systems involve designing the roads themselves to reduce vehicle noise. Lower highway speed limits within city limits can reduce noise. For new development, buffer zones are provided between the residential or commercial buildings and the highway. But for many older neighborhoods, traffic volume has steadily increased over the years as the traffic flow on the adjacent roads has increased. For these neighborhoods, sound barriers are the most viable solution.
Effective noise abatement systems can reduce sound levels 10-15 dB, cutting the loudness of the traffic in half. Where space permits, earth barriers are relative inexpensive and can be used to improve the ecological aesthetics of the neighborhood. This approach is common for new neighborhoods but not often available for existing residential areas. Walls, on the other hand, take up less space. Generally, such walls are limited to 25 feet in height for structural and aesthetic reasons. Noise walls may be built from wood, stucco, concrete, masonry, metal and similar materials.
Concrete sound barrier walls are frequently used because they require only minimal continuing upkeep and are very weather resistant. Moreover, the ability to produce pre-fabricated concrete panels can simplify construction, while also providing the ability to add aesthetic features to the panels.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and described in the following written specification. It is understood that no limitation to the scope of the invention is thereby intended. It is further understood that the present invention includes any alterations and modifications to the illustrated embodiments and includes further applications of the principles of the invention as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains.
According to one aspect of the invention, a composite sound barrier panel 10 includes a substrate 12 and a noise attenuation layer 20, as shown in
In a further aspect of the invention, the noise attenuation layer 20 is formed from a combination of concrete with a fiber composite filler. The fiber composite filler is preferably fiberglass, and most preferably waste fiberglass. The use of waste fiberglass recycles a hazardous waste material. In addition, the use of waste fiberglass significantly reduces the cost of the panel 10 since the cost of the waste material from a reclamation company is significantly lower than the cost of a pre-manufactured fiberglass panel.
In the preferred embodiment, the noise attenuation layer 20 is formed from 2½ parts fiber composite material, 1 part cement and ½ part water. The cement is preferably Lehigh Type 1 or equivalent. The fiber composite material, or fiberglass, is shredded so that it can be mixed with the cement and water. These constituents are thoroughly mixed and poured into a mold corresponding to the desired shape of the panel. The mold face may incorporate structural and/or design features as dictated by the design of the noise abatement system. It is contemplated in a most preferred embodiment that the noise attenuation layer 20 is not a load bearing component of the panel, so reinforcement elements are not essential. If desired, a thin layer of cement may be initially poured, followed immediately by the noise attenuation layer. This thin layer will hide any fiber composite that may reside at the surface of noise attenuation layer. Pouring the noise attenuation layer immediately after the initial concrete layer will allow the two layers to merge together.
Shortly after the noise attenuation layer has been poured, and well before the cement in that layer has set, the concrete substrate 12 may be poured. Pouring this substrate layer while the reduction layer is fresh will allow the materials to commingle and firmly bond together once the concrete has set. The pour for the substrate can proceed according to known concrete panel fabrication techniques, especially where reinforcement elements 14 or other structural/functional elements are to be incorporated into the substrate. The substrate may have a higher slump than the noise attenuation layer to maintain the integrity of the two parts of the panel 10.
The panels 10 have a height and length that is determined by the needs at the job site. The thickness of the substrate 12 will preferably range from 4-6 inches, with a most preferred thickness of 4½ inches. The thickness of the noise attenuation layer 20 can be sized according to the desired noise attenuation characteristics of the layer. This thickness will typically range from 2-5 inches.
In one specific example, a panel was fabricated with a 5¼ inch thick substrate and a 3 inch thick noise attenuation. The sound transmission loss curve for this specimen is shown in
Further testing of the specimen panel verified the weather resistance of the composite construction. These tests include surface burning, exposure to deicing chemicals and rapid freeze-thaw. Of course, the performance of any particular composite panel constructed according to the present invention will depend upon the quality of the concrete mixture. However, the specimen testing established that the composite construction of the panels 10 of the present invention are no more susceptible to environmental effects than a concrete road surface.
In accordance with the present invention, the concrete substrate 12 may be modified as desired for particular considerations, such as strength, cost, weather resistance, aesthetics and the like. Thus, additives may be combined with the cement used to form the concrete substrate, such as plasticizers, sealants and pigments. Some variation in the materials of the noise attenuation layer 20 may be acceptable, although significant modifications may compromise the sound transmission loss performance of the panel. It is therefore preferred that any materials added the noise attenuation layer have sufficient sound absorption qualities.
For instance, in one modified embodiment, wood chips are added to the fiberglass and cement. Preferably, the wood chips are ¼-1½ inches in length and no more than about ¼ inches thick. The wood chips are most preferably recycled from wood products that have been comminuted. In this embodiment, the wood chips are combined in the concrete mixture according to the following formula: 2 parts wood chips, 1 part fiberglass, 1 part cement and ½ part water. The concrete mixture is prepared according to known techniques to form the noise attenuation layer 20. Since the layer 20 is not intended for load bearing, the volume ratio of additives to cement can be much higher than other concrete additives, hence the ability to incorporate not only fiberglass but also woodchips in the concrete mixture. In this circumstance, the cement operates as a binder between the additives as well as between the noise abatement layer 20 and the load bearing concrete substrate 12.
One aspect of the panel 10 of the present invention is that it can be easily precast at a manufacturing facility remote from the installation site. A number of identical molds may be used to produce a quantity of uniform panels, or a single mold may be used to produce a length of panel that is cut to size. The precast panels may formed in fixed molds, by slip-forming, or by other known techniques for fabricating pre-cast concrete panels.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same should be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that only the preferred embodiments have been presented and that all changes, modifications and further applications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
For instance, in the preferred embodiment, the concrete substrate 12 is poured onto the noise abatement layer 20 so that the two layers commingle or physically bond. Alternatively, each segment of the composite panel may be separately formed and cured, and then chemically bonded with a suitable adhesive material, such as concrete adhesive, epoxy and mortar.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3625808 | Martin | Dec 1971 | A |
4325457 | Docherty et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4513040 | Lankard | Apr 1985 | A |
4607466 | Allred | Aug 1986 | A |
5678363 | Ogorchock et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6827179 | Drake et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20030097806 | Brown | May 2003 | A1 |
20060048997 | Foster et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060188740 | Kuan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070137139 | Tierney et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090050401 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |