Patent Grant
9005695
The present invention relates to body implantable treatment devices, and more particularly to stents and other prostheses intended for fixation in body lumens.
Typically, a stent is delivered into position at a treatment site in a compressed state using a delivery device. After the stent is positioned at the treatment site, the delivery device is actuated to release the stent. Following release of the stent, self-expanding stents are allowed to self-expand within the body vessel or lumen.
For stents that will remain in place, movement and migration may be reduced by leaving portions of the stent uncovered (typically the extreme upper and lower portions of the stent) so tissue can grow in to the stent to anchor it. Other approaches to reducing stent migration may include increasing the outside surface roughness or adding hooks to the outside of the stent. Removal can be difficult if tissue has grown into the stent, and if the stent is removed forcefully, tissue damage can occur.
Stents are typically composed of stent filaments, and may be categorized as permanent, removable or bioabsorbable. Permanent stents are retained in place and incorporated into the vessel wall. Removable stents are removed from the body vessel when the stent is no longer needed. A bioabsorbable stent may be composed of, or include bioresorbable material that is broken down by the body and absorbed or passed from the body after some period of time when it is no longer needed.
Commonly used materials for stent filaments include Elgiloy® and Phynox® metal spring alloys. Other metallic materials that may be used for stents filaments are 316 stainless steel, MP35N alloy and superelastic Nitinol nickel-titanium. Another stent, available from Schneider (USA) Inc. of Minneapolis, Minn., has a radiopaque clad composite structure such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,630,840 to Mayer. Stents can also be made of a titanium alloy as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,201.
Bioabsorbable implantable endoprostheses such as stents, stent-grafts, grafts, filters, occlusive devices, and valves may be made of poly(alpha-hydroxy acid) such as poly-L-lactide (PLLA), poly-D-lactide (PDLA), polyglycolide (PGA), polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, polygluconate, polylactic acid-polyethylene oxide copolymers, modified cellulose, collagen, poly(hydroxybutyrate), polyanhydride, polyphosphoester, poly(aminoacides), or related coployrners materials, each of which have a characteristic degradation rate in the body. For example, PGA and polydioxanone are relatively fast-bioabsorbing materials (weeks to months) and PLA and polycaprolactone are a relatively slow-bioabsorbing material (months to years).
Stents as described are used in the treatment of various medical conditions. One such condition, carcinomas in the esophagus may lead to progressive dysphagia, i.e. difficulty in swallowing, and the inability to swallow liquids in the most severe cases. While surgical removal of the carcinoma is sometimes effective, the majority of patients have tumors that cannot be surgically removed. Repeated dilations of the esophagus provide only temporary relief.
Difficult or refractory cases of carcinomas often are treated by intubation using rigid plastic prostheses, or laser therapy with an Nd:YAG laser. These techniques, while often effective, have disadvantages. Rigid plastic prostheses are large, for example having a diameter of 10-12 mm and larger (25-29 mm) outer end flanges. Placement of rigid plastic stents is traumatic, and too frequently causes perforation of the esophageal wall. These prostheses further are subject to migration, obstruction with food or tumor ingrowth, and damage to surrounding cells.
Laser therapy is expensive, typically requiring several treatment sessions. Tumor recurrence is frequent, in the range of 30-40 percent. Submucosal tumors, and certain pulmonary and breast tumors causing dysphagia by esophageal compression, cannot be treated by laser therapy.
Patients with benign tumors may also be treated with repeated dilatations using a balloon catheter or a bougie tube. Another treatment approach is submucosal resection. However, violation of the lumen wall carries the risk of wound contamination, as well as possible fistula formation. Following any treatment that alters the lumen wall, the lumen wall remains very sensitive during the healing process. The healing lumen wall can be repeatedly irritated by stomach contents refluxing into the esophagus or a passing food bolus. In addition, surgery is determined based on the absence of certain factors which significantly increase the risk of surgical mortality, morbidity, and long term adverse events. Factors such as cardiac risk, multisystem failure, general debility, malnutrition and infection limit the patient's health and chances of tolerating the radical curative surgical procedure. Thus, esophageal resection with reanastomosis is most appropriate only for very large tumors, annular tumors, or those densely adherent to larger areas of the lumen wall. Tumors at the anastomotic site often reocclude the esophagus and require the same treatments. Pulmonary resections have similar complications.
The search for a more suitable prosthesis has led to experiments with Gianturco stents, also known as Z-stents. U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,882 (Gianturco) describes such a device employed as an endovascular stent. Such stents for the esophagus have been constructed of 0.018 inch stainless steel wire, and provided with a silicone cover to inhibit tumor ingrowth. It was found necessary, however, to provide a distal silicone bumper to prevent trauma to the esophageal lumen wall.
Self-expanding mesh stents also have been considered for use as esophageal prostheses. U.S. Pat. No. 4,655,771 (Wallsten) discloses a mesh stent as a flexible tubular braided structure formed of helically wound thread elements. Mesh stents are unlikely to lead to pressure necrosis of the esophageal wall. With its inherent pliability the mesh stent, as compared to a rigid plastic stent, is insertable with much less trauma to the patient. Further, the stent can mold itself to, and firmly fix itself against, the esophageal wall to resist migration.
Thus, both malignant and benign strictures of the esophagus and pulmonary tree may be treated using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS). SEMS allow patients to return to a more normal diet thereby enhancing their quality of life. Generally, benign strictures are treated with SEMS only as a last resort. However, a major complication in both malignant and benign cases is stent/lumen re-occlusion over time. That is, the stent is subject to tumor ingrowth because of the spaces between adjacent filaments. This is due, at least in part, to the need to combine sufficient radial force with some open stent mesh to allow tissue incorporation so as to anchor the stent in place. As tissue grows through the mesh (in-growth), and around the stent ends (overgrowth), the body lumen often becomes re-occluded over time. This makes separation of the stent or a stent cover from surrounding tissue difficult. Irritation and inflammation of tissue can result from an anchored stent or its cover being removed. Therefore, there is a need for a covered stent that can establish anchoring quickly, yet can be easily removed when required.
Stents may also be covered with various materials to encourage or inhibit tissue attachment to the stent. Covered stents are gaining favor for biliary applications because they more effectively inhibit tissue attachment, intrusion, and constriction of the tract than bare stents. For example, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) covered stents are desirable for removable stents because tissue attachment or in-growth is reduced in comparison to bare stent or a stent covered with textile (polyester) material. Laminated ePTFE may also be used to cover stents. U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,089 of Sahatjiian et al. describes a stent coated on its inner surfaces with hydrogel (i) to protect cells of the lumen which may have been damaged during deployment of the stent, (ii) to reduce flow disturbances, and (iii) for the delivery of therapeutic agents embodied in the gel.
As stents are covered with material to aid in their removal, stent migration from the treatment site increases. There remains a continuing need for covered stents which include characteristics to maintain the stent in position at the treatment site. For example, stents covered with ePTFE, such as Precedent, are easily removed after a given time period, such as six months, but may not provide sufficient fixation to prevent the risk of migration during the six month period. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0177904 describes a removable stent having a bioabsorbable or biodegradable polymeric outer coating that maintains a helical configuration of the stent for some period of time. Upon degradation or absorption of the coating, the stent is converted back into a soft, elongated shape. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0002399 describes another removable stent structure including an outer bioabsorbable/degradable coating providing rigidity for some period of time after which the stent reverts to a softened filament for removal. U.S. Pat. No. 5,961,547 describes a similar temporary stent structure.
An endoprosthesis comprising a stent, a cover fully covering said stent wherein said cover has variable porosity in the radial direction, and an adhesion layer connecting said stent to said cover. Another aspect of the invention is a method of implanting an endoprosthesis which includes providing a stent, providing a cover with variable porosity in the radial direction, connecting said stent to said cover with an adhesion layer to form a covered stent, and implanting said covered stent within a body lumen of a patient. Yet another aspect of the present invention is an apparatus comprising covering means with variable porosity in the radial direction, means for providing radial, outwardly directed force to said covering means, and means for connecting temporarily said covering means to said means for providing radial, outwardly directed force. Still another aspect of the present invention is the process for making a covered stent comprising the steps of mounting a stent on a mandrel, applying an adhesion layer onto the external surface of said stent while spinning said mandrel, and applying a stent cover of variable porosity onto said adhesion layer.
We first briefly described the drawings.
Referring to
This general composite structure provides several advantages. For example, a radiopaque (RO) substance is often added to a stent to assist in identifying the position of the stent within the body lumen. Without the inner covered SEMS, the bioabsorbable component of the stent would need to be loaded with a RO substance to enable fluoroscopic visualization upon deployment. Unfortunately, addition of RO substances to the polymer weakens the polymer thereby limiting the radial strength of the device, and leaving behind a potentially undesirable residual substance when the bioabsorbable element degrades. However, in various embodiments of the present invention, a composite stent may be configured to place the radiopacity into the inner element or a covering of the inner element. This may be done by making an element of the stent of a RO material, placing markers within the element or the covers, incorporating a RO core within an element or by similar methods.
Once the composite stent structure is in place, the bioabsorbable outer stent will, over time, become incorporated into the lumen wall which will keep the combined structure from migrating. The outer element of the present invention may also provide interference or friction to prevent migration prior to integration into the lumen wall. Other methods of preventing migration included within the present invention include hooks or anchors on either stent or cover, adhesives to attach to the vessel wall, designing the outer stents with bumps or ridges or a unique cross-section, suturing or fastening the stent in place in the body, flaring the ends, or having retainer rings of larger diameter included at the end of the stents and similar methods and devices.
Addressing the inner element, while any stent element may be used for the inner element, Nitinol SEMS are known to have sufficient radial force and apply a gradual pressure against the force of the stricture and lumen wall. The bioabsorbable/removable SEMS structure retains the gradual pressure advantage of SEMS that may be compromised with a bioabsorbable stent alone. To obtain a radial force like that of SEMS, a much thicker filament would otherwise be required. The present composite stent technology minimizes the formation of scar tissue and allows for the use of more flexible bioabsorbable structures with smaller diameter bioabsorbable filaments. An inner stent cover may be included to provide a barrier to incorporation of the inner stent which enables its eventual removal. According to one embodiment, a fully covered inner section may be removed immediately (within the first day), acutely (within 1-21 days), or chronically (greater than 21 days) following placement of the outer member. The bioabsorbable element or the inner element may be used to fully deploy the outer element, thus avoiding the use of a balloon or other mechanical dilator. In addition to assisting in positioning the outer element, a fully covered SEMS shields the healing lumen wall from recurrent injury associated with stomach acid reflux, food, fluids or other substances that travel through the lumen. This in turn may reduce the amount of scar tissue formed on the lumen wall. Further, tissue buildup is limited to the bioabsorbable filament thickness which defines the gap between the lumen wall and cover.
The combined structure of the composite stent enables removal of the inner element to leave behind only the temporary-absorbable element. The two may be attached by a nondegrading (“permanent”) or bioabsorbable means such as sutures, clips, staples, dissolvable gel, adhesive or mechanical interlock. Connectors incorporating easily removable means may also be used, such as interwoven filaments which may be pulled out, a crochet that may be unraveled or an inner element which may be “unscrewed” from an outer element. The connection may be made at the extremes of the stents (i.e. through the last row of loops or cells) or anywhere along the length of the structure. The two may be separated by mechanical means such as a snare, scissors, forceps, laser or a combination of these to sever the connecting component. Alternately, they can be separated through absorption if a bioabsorbable connector is used such as a dissolvable adhesive or a pH-reactive connector.
When certain material is chosen, the bioabsorbable backbone, typically the outer element, will become fully incorporated into the lumen wall within approximately four weeks. Typically, once the bioabsorbable stent elements are incorporated, scar tissue will be formed that surrounds and eventually replaces the stent to support the lumen. To accomplish this the bioabsorbable-polymer stent must be in intimate contact with the lumen wall to allow for incorporation. If the stent does not fully expand against the lumen wall or cannot resist the external load from the stricture during healing, the lumen will become occluded and dysphagia will return. The inner element such as the SEMS pushes and keeps the bioabsorbable backbone in contact with the lumen wall to promote healing without requiring the bioabsorbable structure to take the full load or gradually expand the lumen. Alternatively, the inner element may be balloon expandable. After the incorporation time period, once the site has fully healed, the fully covered inner SEMS may be removed.
The outer bioabsorbable element may be in a form other than a stent mesh. A graft, tube, stent or similar structure may be attached to the inner element to enhance the function of the combined structure. Likewise, the inner element may be in a form other than a stent mesh. In one embodiment, any expandable structure may be used to self-expand the combined structure. Examples may be, but are not limited to, a dilator, vena cava filters, venous valves, gastro esophageal valves, etc.
The inner element may be made bioabsorbable or degradable and the outer element may be made from a non-absorbable material in some embodiments. This may be desirable where, for example, a permanent implant provided by the outer element lacks the necessary integrity by itself to resist loading prior to incorporation and/or where a secondary procedure to remove the implant is not possible or desirable. In these embodiments, the outer element remains as a permanent implant after all or a portion of the inner element has been bioabsorbed or degraded. Such a bioabsorbable inner backbone may include elements that are non-absorbable and designed to continue to function after removal of the inner element and/or after the bioabsorbable element has degraded. Examples of this may be mechanisms such as valves for anti-reflux control of stomach contents back into the esophagus, mechanisms such as valves to control reflux of blood from the arterial to venous vessels in the circulatory system (i.e., arterial-venous fistulas in the arm or legs), and mechanisms such as valves for the venous system to address DVT. Similarly, use of the outer covering on the inner element will facilitate the same protection of the healing tissue with an alternate outer structure.
In some embodiments the composite stent structure may also be used as a means for agent delivery. The outer bioabsorbable element, the inner element or the filament material used for either may be impregnated or coated with an agent in a coating or gel form. This may include outer or inner elements with agents and means of deploying those agents. Such means include, but are not limited to: agent directly on the device, agent within coating of the device (coating being either eluting or responding to triggers such as pressure, sponge, or body heat), device with channels, reservoirs, pores or means to hold agents, the agent within degradable structures such as the device itself or the coating on the device, agents applied by other devices such as delivery catheters or balloons, devices with reservoirs wrapped around, agents within the attachment means, or agents released by deployment of either device such as by cracking open the sheath. Further, various coatings may be used to improve the radiopacity, alter the lubricity and/or the surface texture, or as means to form the cover in the internal SEMS element. All of these offer means to improve the function, imaging, therapeutic value, and/or manufacturability of the device. A preferred embodiment for agent delivery is a coated outer stent.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the form of the outer element may be modified to assist in the application of agents. These alternate forms of the outer element may be made to contact or penetrate the lumen wall. Accordingly the outer element may be made blunt or sharpened depending upon the desired intent. Additionally, the form of the outer element may assist in stabilizing the composite stent in place, or increase its therapeutic value by delivering a great quantity of agent.
Attachment of the inner and outer element may be accomplished using various means, structures and techniques. For example, the inner and outer elements may be attached during manufacturing or deployed separately and attached in-vivo. Various attachment means may also be used. For example, as will be further described, the two may be mechanically interlocked by mechanical means such as screwing together or alignment of a boss and slot.
The present invention provides several benefits. For example, plastic stents, whether bioabsorbable or of another non-bioabsorbable polymer, usually do not have the radial force of the expanding metal stents (SEMS) such as Ultraflex™ or Wallstent®. The present invention may be used to assist in fully expanding these stents to their intended final diameters once positioned at the site of the stricture.
Further, plastic stents, whether made of a bioabsorbable or non-bioabsorbable material are subject to creep under a sustained load. These stents are often loaded or compressed while preloaded on the delivery system (with or without elevated temperature and humidity associated with sterilization and/or handling). If the stent is held in a constrained configuration where the initial stent diameter is reduced significantly to allow placement into the body, the plastic will likely permanently deform or creep under the load. If a stent has taken a permanent set or deformity due to packaging and delivery, the size and shape of the stent upon placement into the body of the patient may be incorrect and result in creep after placement. The present invention may be used to eliminate or reduce this creep.
To address the condition where the material creeps due to the load applied during prolonged constrainment on the delivery system and/or due to the sustained and potentially increasing load from the tumor or stricture, the bioabsorbable stent can be affixed to a removable stent. According to one embodiment of the invention as shown in
SEMS used as inner element 505 may be left in place for a period of time to allow the polymeric outer stent element 503 to become incorporated into body lumen wall 501. The typical time range for incorporation of a stent into a vessel or lumen wall is one to three weeks, but may vary depending upon a number of parameters, including materials, geometry, tissue type and condition and force on the tissue.
SEMS inner element 505 may include covering 504 over the length upon which the polymeric stent outer element 503 is held. The covering formed over inner element 505 functions to block the tissue from incorporating into the removable SEMS and confine the ingrowth to the bioabsorbable outer element 503. With tissue incorporation around the polymeric stent (outer element 503) and not into the SEMS (inner element 505), the SEMS may be more easily removed with less tissue damage.
The SEMS may serve multiple purposes. Upon deployment, the SEMS carries the outer stent element with it through its self expansion and helps to deploy the outer stent element. This avoids the need for using a balloon catheter to deploy the outer stent element as shown in and described in
The SEMS may be removed after the outer stent element has been incorporated into the wall. This removal may be accomplished through use of retrieval loop 507. Once incorporation has occurred, the vessel will be less likely to reduce in size as scar tissue creates a scaffold limiting the lumen or vessel to the desired size.
The outer stent element may be held to the SEMS using a dissolvable gel that adheres the outer stent element to the covered SEMS, or by bioabsorbable or biodegradable sutures, clips, or staples, or by an adhesive that has a low break away strength. Additionally, biodegradable adhesives, bosses, and triggerable dissolution connections may be used to connect the inner and outer elements. Electrical, thermal, light energy, chemical activation and other triggering methods may be used.
In another embodiment of the present invention, either the inner stent element or the outer stent element may include radiopaque characteristics. Radiopacity may be provided in some embodiments by including radiopaque fillers. Radiopaque fillers include compounds such as barium that may be mixed integrally or coated on the stent materials. In some situations, fillers may not function optimally; they may compromise the physical characteristics and performance of a device or may be undesirably released into the body. Preferably, the radiopacity of the device is provided by virtue of innate material properties. In one such embodiment, the SEMS inner stent element may provide sufficient radiopacity to the otherwise radiolucent polymeric outer stent element. In further embodiments, radiopacity may be imparted to the composite stent device by addition of radiopaque filaments or structures within the radiolucent outer stent element. In some embodiments, one or more radiopaque markers are added to either of the stent elements. An alternative to fillers may include a tracer filament or stent within the bioabsorbable or polymeric stent. This is done by using a metallic wire or marker attached or incorporated into the stricture. This of course results in this material being incorporated into the lumen wall or endothelium.
A further advantage of the retrievable SEMS with a bioabsorbable element system includes the ability to deliver and localize therapeutic agents (agents) or other, e.g., radioactive seeds.
The bioabsorbable stent and/o SEMS cover may be impregnated, compounded or coated with an agent to enable a very localized delivery of agents to the lumen wall or vascular wall. The SEMS applies a radial force to keep the bioabsorbable stent element in contact with the surrounding lumen wall to allow agent or therapeutic agent uptake. The force may also be used to push the therapeutic agent into the surrounding lumen wall. Additionally, if configured as a retrievable stent, the SEMS may be removed when the therapeutic agent has been delivered or replaced with another stent element comprising a therapeutic agent to effect another cycle of administration. Further, the covered SEMS, if covered with a outer stent element that has been doped, impregnated, compounded, or coated with a therapeutic agent, would shield the outer element from bodily fluids that might otherwise displace the therapeutic agent. Thus, as shown in
Covering 504 on the SEMS of
In alternate embodiments, as shown in
The inner stent element may also be equipped with a bioabsorbable filament which gives a physician access, through the lumen wall, into tissue below the surface. This access may give the physician a conduit to the underlying tissue (or tumor) as the polymer breaks down. In one embodiment, as the polymer breaks down, it may be replaced with the therapeutic agent. In this embodiment, the positive force from the inner stent element would push the therapeutic agent to the intended site. A reservoir to hold the therapeutic agent may be formed of a bioabsorbable or pressure sensitive weeping-type membrane sack to allow the therapeutic agent to ooze out of the reservoir. In this and other configurations, a needle could serve to wick a therapeutic agent. Alternatively, the body of a needle may comprise a therapeutic agent which is delivered as the needle degrades.
In
Stent cover 1303 may have variable porosity in the radial direction in a preferred embodiment. For example, the outer wall of stent cover 1303 that contacts body lumen wall 1304 may have high porosity to promote tissue in-growth and adhesion of stent cover 1303 to body lumen wall 1304. In contrast, the inner wall of stent cover 1303 in this example may be of very low porosity or may even be a solid film to reduce cell or fluid transfer. Other porosity combinations may be used to design covered stents with desired adhesion and removal characteristics. Various materials may be used to form stent cover 1303, such as polyurethane, block copolymers, Dacrone, PTFE silicon, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), silicone rubber, ethylene propylene copolymer, styrene, ethylene, or butylene styrene block copolymer. While non-biodegradable materials may be used in a preferred embodiment, a stent cover 1303 may also be made of biodegradable materials. Stent cover 1303 may be formed of several layers of different materials such that a stent cover 1303 of variable porosity is formed. Stent cover 1303 materials may be shaped to form an interlocking mesh with specific pore size.
Adhesion layer 1305 may incorporate a number of materials and designs to keep stent cover 1303 and stent 1302 connected. Generally, adhesion layer 1305 may be made using a non-degradable or non-bioabsorbable material. Non-degradable or non-bioabsorbable materials may include metals, plastics, or other solids and may be in the form of fasteners such as clips or sutures. Non-degradable or non-bioabsorbable materials may be used in adhesion layer 1305 in combination with biodegradable or dissolvable materials. In a preferred embodiment, adhesion layer 1305 may be a biodegradable or dissolvable material. Biopolymers such as collagen, Alignate, Fibrin, PLA, PGA, PLA/GA copolymer, and PCL may be used. In some embodiments, the degradation of adhesion layer 1305 may be triggered at a selected time. Triggering may be accomplished by applying a triggering agent such as energy in such forms as heat, radiofrequency energy, laser radiation, x-ray and gamma ray radiation, or particle energy such as electron, neutron, or alpha particle radiation. The use of electricity or magnetic fields as triggering agents may be used to trigger adhesion layer 1305 degradation. Chemical triggering agents may also be used in some embodiments, where adhesion layer 1305 is treated with a compound that causes degradation of adhesion layer 1305. Treatment of adhesion layer 1305 with a triggering agent may occur after endoprosthesis 1301 is in place in a body lumen, or may occur before endoprosthesis 1301 is inserted in a body lumen. Alternatively, adhesion layer 1305 may be removed using mechanical force, or may be removed using any combination of the above mentioned separation means, for example, using heat and solvent, et cetera for removal. In addition combinations of the above mentioned separation means, or other known separation means may be used to separate the elements. Removal or degradation of adhesion layer 1305 results in the stent 1302 and stent cover 1303 remaining in place in the absence of external force. In a preferred embodiment, application of external force applied to stent 1302 will result in the stent cover 1303 remaining in place while the stent 1302 is removed from the body. For example, the stent 1302 may be made to stretch longitudinally, causing its diameter to become smaller and detaching from the stent cover 1303. In a preferred embodiment, stent cover 1303 may remain attached to the body lumen wall 1304 after the removal of stent 1302. In one example, an esophageal stent with cover may be placed in the esophagus. The stent is left in place until tissue ingrowth begins to anchor the cover, at which time it may be removed. In this example, an adhesion layer may be used to bind the stent with its cover, and the adhesion layer may be degradable. The stent and cover in this example reduce trauma to the patient and avoid irritation to the body lumen wall by eliminating any forceful separation of the device and any ingrown tissue. Adhesion layer 1305, stent cover 1303, or stent 1302 may also incorporate radiopaque materials to aid in locating an endoprosthesis 1301 within a body lumen 1304.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It will be evident from considerations of the foregoing that the devices of the present invention may be constructed using a number of methods and materials, in a wide variety of sizes and styles for the greater efficiency and convenience of a user.
While the foregoing has described what are considered to be preferred embodiments of the invention, it is understood that various modifications may be made therein and that the invention may be implemented in various forms and embodiments, and that it may be applied in numerous applications, only some of which have been described herein. It is intended by the following claims to claim all such modifications and variations which fall within the true scope of the invention.
It should further be noted and understood that all publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in this specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. All publications, patents and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication patent or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/962,567, filed Oct. 13, 2004 which is a continuation-in-part to “Composite Stent With Inner And Outer Stent Elements and Method Of Using The Same”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/720,176, by Peter Shank and F. Anthony Headley Jr., filed on Nov. 25, 2003.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3833002 | Palma | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4655771 | Wallstein | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4705516 | Barone et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4954126 | Wallsten | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5026377 | Burton et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5061275 | Wallstein et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5201757 | Hevn et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5464450 | Buscemi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474563 | Myler et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5534287 | Lukic | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5575818 | Pinchuk | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5630840 | Mayer | May 1997 | A |
| 5645559 | Hachtman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5718159 | Thompson | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5741333 | Frid | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5755774 | Pinchuk | May 1998 | A |
| 5797949 | Parodi | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5888201 | Stinson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891191 | Stinson | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902317 | Kleshinski et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5957974 | Thompson | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961547 | Razavi | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6042578 | Dinh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6156064 | Chouinard | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6190404 | Palmaz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6214040 | Jayaraman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221100 | Strecker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6228111 | Tomala et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254632 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261320 | Tam et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6290722 | Wang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6312457 | DiMatteo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6355058 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6379382 | Yang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383214 | Banas et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398802 | Yee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416548 | Chinn et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6436132 | Patel et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6451050 | Rudakov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6506437 | Harish et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6514283 | DiMatteo | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6656216 | Hossainy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6756007 | Pletzer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6770086 | Girton | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6827737 | Hill et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 7060087 | DiMatteo | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7736687 | Sims et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7955374 | Erickson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8197552 | Mandpe | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8435285 | Shank et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 20010039450 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020010508 | Chobotov et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058984 | Butaric et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103527 | Kocur et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165601 | Clerc | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030045924 | Datta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059463 | Lahtinen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074049 | Hoganson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114917 | Holloway et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040024448 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030377 | Dubson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050049693 | Walker | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20060195173 | DiMatteo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| E1, Lamination, 2013, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/lamination. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 08/640,253, filed Apr. 6, 1999, Stinson. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 08/993,985, filed Jan. 12, 2005, Burnside. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 08/946,906, filed Sep. 28, 1999, Thompson. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130243937 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10962567 | Oct 2004 | US |
| Child | 13887886 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10720176 | Nov 2003 | US |
| Child | 10962567 | US |
