This disclosure generally relates to composite structures, and deals more particularly with composite structural members having integrated stiffeners, and to methods for making such members.
It is sometimes necessary to reinforce composite structures, such as those used in aerospace industry in order to meet strength and/or stiffness requirements. These structures may be reinforced by adding stiffeners to the structure which may provide the structure with additional strength and rigidity. In the past, individual stiffeners have been attached to primary structural members using any of several secondary assembly processes, including but not limited to the use of discrete fasteners, bonding, co-bonding and co-curing. Each of these processes may have disadvantages, such as, without limitation, the additional time and labor to complete the assembly process and/or the need for relatively expensive capital equipment such as autoclaves used to co-cure parts. Additionally, in some cases, the stiffeners may comprise multiple parts which may add undesirable weight and/or part count to a vehicle and/or increase the time and labor required to complete the assembly process. In some applications where the stiffeners are integrated into the structural member, the ends of the stiffeners, referred to as “runouts”, may not blend or transition smoothly into the member, which may result in undesirable stress concentrations in the structural member. Existing runout designs have discontinuous fibers at trimmed edges that may only moderately reduce stress concentrations in the surrounding structure.
Accordingly, there is a need for a simple, cost effective method of making stiffened composite structures in which stiffeners are integrated into structural members to form a unitized structure. There is also a need for a stiffener design having runouts that blend smoothly into the structural member and reduce or eliminate stress concentrations at the ends of the stiffeners.
The disclosed embodiments provide a unitized composite structure having integrated stiffeners with smoothly transitioned runouts at their ends which reduce or substantially eliminate stress concentrations. The stiffeners are produced using fiber preforms that are shaped to blend the ends of the stiffeners into the surrounding structure. This smooth blending avoids abrupt terminations or discontinuous transitions between the stiffener and the surrounding structure, and may reduce or eliminate the need for trimming operations at the ends of the stiffeners. The reduction in trimming operations may reduce fabrication time, process steps and/or labor costs. The runout transitions the stiffener cross section from a tall narrow profile to a wide flat profile, while maintaining a constant perimeter and cross sectional area. A variety of stiffener architectures and physical characteristics may be realized using various preform fabrication processes. The runout design allows fabrication of stiffeners having complex geometries, resulting in greater design flexibility and process optimization.
According to one disclosed embodiment, a unitized composite structure comprises a composite member and at least one composite stiffener formed integral with the composite member for stiffening the member. At least one end of the stiffener includes a runout forming a substantially smooth transition into the composite member. The composite member includes a first resin infused fiber reinforcement, and the stiffener includes a second resin infused reinforcement, wherein the infused resin is substantially continuous and homogeneous throughout the first and second fiber reinforcements. The runout has a cross section that varies in shape but remains substantially constant in area along its length.
According to another embodiment, an integrally stiffened composite structure comprises a cured polymer resin matrix, a structural member portion including a first fiber reinforcement held in the matrix, and a stiffener portion for stiffening the structural member portion. The stiffener portion includes a second fiber reinforcement held in the matrix. The stiffener portion includes at least one end having a runout forming a substantially smooth transition into the structural member portion. The matrix is substantially continuous and homogeneous throughout the first and second portions.
According to a further embodiment, a method is provided of making a stiffened composite structure. The method comprises fabricating a first fiber preform, placing the first fiber preform in a mold recess having the geometry of the stiffener, placing a second fiber preform over the mold recess covering the first preform, co-infusing the first and second fiber preforms with a polymer resin, and curing the resin-infused preforms. Fabricating the first fiber preform includes braiding fibers into a flexible tubular shell, and filling the shell with continuous unidirectional fibers. Placing the first fiber preform in the mold recess includes conforming the tubular shell to the geometry of the recess.
Referring first to
Referring now to
The inner core 38 may be partially or completely filled with a structural or non-structural material, depending upon the application. In the case of the example shown in
As mentioned above, the stiffener 34 may have numerous variations in geometry and/or construction details.
Still another variation of the stiffener 34 is shown in
Still another example of the stiffener 34 is shown in
Another embodiment of the stiffener 34 is shown in
Another variation of the stiffener 34 is shown in
A further embodiment of the stiffener 34 shown in
From
Attention is now directed to
As shown at 62, dry, or substantially dry fiber stiffener preforms 65 are placed in the grooves 58 either manually, or using an automated placement equipment 60. Depending on the shape and construction of the stiffener preforms 65, portions of the stiffener preforms 65 may be tacked together with tackifiers or binders to assist in holding the preform 65 together and/or to maintain their shapes until they are infused with resin. Prior to being infused with resin and cured, the stiffener preforms 65 may be cord-like and continuous in length, allowing them to be stored in roll form, dispensed and cut to length as needed. Alternatively, the preforms 65 may be stiff and formed substantially to the required length, size and shape and stored flat, or any variation between continuous/flexible and discrete/stiff. When automated placement equipment 60 is used, the preforms 65 may be placed on the tool 56 at relatively high rates. Because the grooves 58 in the tool are pre-aligned, the location and orientation of the stiffeners 34 relative to the composite member 32 can be precisely controlled. In other words, the fixed position of the grooves 58 in the tool face 56a automatically indexes the preforms 65 relative to each other, and relative to the fiber reinforcement 65. The preforms 65 are substantially identical to the stiffeners 34 previously described except that they have not yet been infused with a resin and are therefore relatively flexible.
The grooves 58 may have a cross sectional profile (not shown) that substantially matches that of the preforms 65, so that when placed in the grooves 58, the preforms 65 substantially completely fill the grooves 58, resulting in a substantially smooth IML profile. Flexible preforms 65 readily conform to the cross sectional profile and curvature (if any) of the grooves 58. Discrete/stiff preforms may be pre-formed to at least substantially match the cross sectional profile and curvature (if any) of the grooves. The grooves 58 essentially recess the stiffener preforms 65 in the tool 56 relative to a fiber reinforcement 67 so that the top of the preforms 65 lie generally flush with the tool face 56a. Optionally, a film adhesive (not shown) may be placed in the grooves 58, overlying the stiffener preforms 65, in those applications where it is desired to adhesively bond the stiffener caps 35 to the composite member 32 along the butt joint 29, as shown in
Next, as shown at 64, the dry or substantially dry composite member fiber reinforcement 67 is placed on the tool face 56a, overlying and contacting the stiffener preforms 65 and the tool face 56a. The composite member fiber reinforcement 67 as well as the fiber preforms 65 may be tackified with a binder (not shown). The composite member fiber reinforcement 67 may comprise, for example and without limitation, a preform that may include multiple plies of woven or knitted fabric that are laid up ply-by-ply on the tool face 56a, or which are stacked and then placed as a single pre-assembled lay-up on the tool face 56a. In the illustrated example, the composite member fiber reinforcement 67 is substantially flat however, in other embodiments, it is possible that the composite member fiber reinforcement 67 may be a preform that is shaped before the composite member fiber reinforcement 67 is placed on the tool face 56a. At 66, a caul sheet 68 is placed over the composite member fiber member reinforcement 67. The caul sheet 68 aids in controlling the OML (outer mold line) surface finish and skin mark-off adjacent the stiffener 34. Then, at 70, preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67 are co-infused with a suitable thermoset resin using any of various well known resin infusion techniques, including, for example and without limitation, vacuum assisted resin infusion molding (VARIM). As will be discussed below, the preform 65 and fiber reinforcement 67 may be compacted and consolidated prior to resin infusion. The infused preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67 are then cured by the application of heat though any suitable means such as an oven 72.
Attention is now directed to
A rigid or semi-rigid caul sheet 68 is placed over the resin distribution media 86, following which a vacuum bag 88 is placed over the layup and is sealed to the tool 54 by means of a sealant tape 90 or by similar means. In other embodiments, a double vacuum bag technique may be used in which a second vacuum bag (not shown) is placed over the first vacuum bag 88 in order to protect the preform 65 from leaks in the first vacuum bag 88 during the resin infusion and curing processes. The use of the caul sheet 68 and resin distribution media 86 is illustrative of one typical arrangement for resin infusion, but may not be required when other resin infusion techniques are employed. A variety of other resin infusion techniques are possible. A supply reservoir of thermoset resin 92 is coupled by a resin inlet tube 94 to an inlet channel tube 96 within the vacuum bag 88. An outlet vacuum reservoir 102 is coupled by a resin outlet tube 100 to an outlet channel tube 98 inside the vacuum bag 88.
A vacuum within the bag 88 generated by the outlet vacuum reservoir 102 evacuates the bag 88 of air, creating a pressure less than atmospheric pressure within the bag 88 that draws resin from the supply reservoir 92 into the bag through the inlet channel tube 96. Prior to resin infusion, the bag 88 may be used to compact and consolidate the preform 65 and fiber reinforcement 67. Resin flows from the inlet channel tube 96 and exits the bag 88 through the outlet channel tube 98 where it is collected in the vacuum reservoir 102. As the resin travels from the inlet channel 96 to the outlet channel 98, preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67 are co-infused with a single shot of the resin while atmospheric pressure forces the bag 88 down onto the caul sheet 68. As mentioned earlier,
The caul sheet 68 applies substantially even pressure over its area to the infused preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67, causing the preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67 to be compacted and forced against each other during the resin infusion process. Heat may be applied to the infused preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67 both during and after the resin infusion process in order to encourage the resin flow, and then cure the resin to produce a unitized composite structure 30 in which the stiffeners 34 are essentially integrated into the composite member 32. The co-infusion of the preform 65 and composite member fiber reinforcement 67 with resin results in a substantially continuous and homogeneous resin matrix which holds and integrates the structural member and stiffener portions 32, 34 respectively.
Attention is now directed to
At 116, the stiffener preforms 65 are placed in the grooves 58 in the tool face 56a, following which at 118 the composite member fiber reinforcement 67 is placed on the tool face 56a, overlying and contacting the stiffener preforms 65, as previously described in connection with
Reference is now made to
Attention is now particularly directed to
Reference is now made to
Another embodiment for making the first fiber preform is shown at 177. At 179, a single braiding process is used to form the shell 36 around a group 138 of unidirectional fibers 39, and at 180 the first preform 136 is cut to suitable lengths. At 181 the flexible preform 136 is placed in the mold recess 58 and conformed to the geometry of the recess 58.
In a further embodiment for making the first fiber preform shown at 168, a first fiber ply 160 is placed on a mold 54 overlying a mold recess 158, as shown at 178. Next at 182, the first fiber ply 160 is formed into the mold recess 158 and conformed to the contours of the recess 158. At 183, the formed first ply 160 is filled with continuous reinforcement fibers 39, following which, at 184, a second fiber ply 165 is placed on the mold 54 overlying the fiber filled first ply 160.
Still another embodiment for making the first preform 142 is shown at 185. At 187, shell and core fibers are braided together and simultaneously formed into a semi-rigid preform 142 that is pre-shaped to substantially match the geometry of the mold recess 58. The pre-shaped and semi-rigid preform 142 is then placed into the mold recess 58 at 189.
After the first preform 136, 142 is made as described above, a second preform or fiber reinforcement 67 (
Embodiments of the disclosure may find use in a variety of potential applications, particularly in the transportation industry, including for example, aerospace, marine and automotive applications. Thus, referring now to
Each of the processes of method 192 may be performed or carried out by a system integrator, a third party, and/or an operator (e.g., a customer). For the purposes of this description, a system integrator may include without limitation any number of aircraft manufacturers and major-system subcontractors; a third party may include without limitation any number of vendors, subcontractors, and suppliers; and an operator may be an airline, leasing company, military entity, service organization, and so on.
As shown in
Systems and methods embodied herein may be employed during any one or more of the stages of the production and service method 192. For example, parts, structures and components corresponding to production process 200 may be fabricated or manufactured in a manner similar to parts, structures and components produced while the aircraft 194 is in service. Also the disclosed method embodiments may be utilized during the production stages 200 and 202, for example, by substantially expediting assembly of or reducing the cost of an aircraft 194. Similarly, one or more of apparatus embodiments, method embodiments, or a combination thereof may be utilized while the aircraft 194 is in service, for example and without limitation, to maintenance and service 208.
Although the embodiments of this disclosure have been described with respect to certain exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the specific embodiments are for purposes of illustration and not limitation, as other variations will occur to those of skill in the art.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/823,414 filed Jun. 25, 2010, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2709973 | Meyer | Jun 1955 | A |
3339333 | Kovalcik | Sep 1967 | A |
3775238 | Lyman | Nov 1973 | A |
3890749 | Gunther | Jun 1975 | A |
4357292 | Myers | Nov 1982 | A |
4606961 | Munsen et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4942013 | Palmer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5419965 | Hampson | May 1995 | A |
5567499 | Cundiff et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569508 | Cundiff | Oct 1996 | A |
5601852 | Seemann | Feb 1997 | A |
5771680 | Zahedi | Jun 1998 | A |
5851336 | Cundiff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6156146 | Cundiff | Dec 2000 | A |
6319447 | Cundiff et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6415496 | Dominguez Casado et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6561478 | Cundiff et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6586054 | Walsh | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589618 | Cundiff et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6627142 | Slaughter et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6811733 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840750 | Thrash et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6872340 | Cundiff et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896841 | Velicki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7074474 | Toi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080805 | Prichard et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7138028 | Burpo | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7334782 | Woods et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7413695 | Thrash et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419627 | Sheu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7510757 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7633040 | Glain et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682682 | Leon-Dufour et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8042315 | Ashton et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8042767 | Velicki et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043453 | Sawicki et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8091603 | Pham et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8182628 | Biornstad et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8267354 | Kallinen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8302909 | Cazeneuve et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8424806 | Outon Hernandez et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20030025231 | Slaughter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050003145 | Toi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050073076 | Woods et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050211846 | Leon-Dufour et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070108665 | Glain et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080246175 | Biornstad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090044914 | Pham et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090057487 | Velicki et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090200425 | Kallinen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100024958 | Sawicki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100170989 | Gray | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110315824 | Pook et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120052247 | Pook et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120119422 | Lockett et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120234978 | Hernando Navas et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2452808 | May 2012 | EP |
1001725 | May 1997 | NL |
2004011169 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006096647 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2011003844 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011162884 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action, dated Aug. 16, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/944,089, 26 pages. |
Byrd, L. W. and V. Birman (2005). “The estimate of the effect of z-pins on the strain release rate, fracture and fatigue in a composite co-cured z-pinned double cantilever beam.” Composite Structures 68(1): 53-63. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TWP-4C47G3S-1/2/35c4fbe50b301f6d99a3f7cOce08fcb2. |
Christopher T. Key, M. R. G. and C. H. Andrew (2003). “Progressive failure predictions for rib-stiffened panels based on multicontinuum technology.” Composite Structures 65(3-4): 357-366. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TWP-4B9D7Y5-3/2/2bbf1f5da96969f8280494eecd40aeff. |
John Higgins, P. E., P. Wegner, et al. (2004). “Design and testing of the Minotaur advanced grid-stiffened fairing.” Composite Structures 66(1-4): 339-349. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TWP-4DS7YDD-2/2/3b11916f1da3d12111c360b4475efd51. |
Mouritz, A. P. (2007). “Review of z-pinned composite laminates.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38(12): 2383-2397. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TWN-4PGPVXR-3/2/73e14a395d8e71e67fe887869b23b3f0. |
Sheppard, A. T., K. H. Leong, et al. (1998). “Rib separation in postbuckling stiffened shear panels.” Composite Structures 41(3-4): 339-352. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TWP-3VNH1XY-F/2/a1f194e9b1e7523d356256424942f8c8. |
Stickler, P. B. and M. Ramulu (2001). “Investigation of mechanical behavior of transverse stitched T-joints with PR520 resin in flexure and tension.” Composite Structures 52(3-4): 307-314. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TWP-42YDNJC-6/2/f8c0dde9fd5517d78de019418dc73fa1. |
Final Office Action, dated Dec. 21, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/823,414, 24 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 26, 2011, regarding Application No. PCT/US2011/036191 (WO2011162884), 3 pages. |
European Search Report, dated Feb. 16, 2012, regarding Application No. EP11187924 (EP2452808), 8 pages. |
International Search Report, dated May 3, 2012, regarding Application No. PCT/US2011/063658, 12 pages. |
Byrd et al., “The estimate of the effect of z-pins on the strain release rate, fracture, and fatigue in a composite co-cured z-pinned double cantilever beam,” Composites Structures, 2005, vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 53-63. (Abstract). |
Campbell, “Cure Tooling,” In: Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, 2004. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, pp. 128-129. |
Han et al., “Resin film infusion of stitched stiffened composite panels,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2003, vol. 34, pp. 227-236. |
Higgins et al., “Design and testing of the Minotaur advanced grid-stiffened fairing,” Composite Structures, 2004, vol. 66, No. 1-4, pp. 339-349. |
Key et al., “Progressive failure predictions for rib-stiffened panels based on multicontinuum technology,” Composite Structures, 2004, vol. 65, No. 3-4, pp. 357-366. (Abstract). |
Mourtiz, “Review of z-pinned composite laminates,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2007, vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 2383-2397. (Abstract). |
Sheppard et al., “Rib separation in postbuckling stiffened shear panels,” Composite Structures, 1998, vol. 41, No. 3-4, pp. 339-352. (Abstract). |
Stickler et al., “Investigation of mechanical behavior of transverse stitched T-joints with PR520 resin in flexure and tenstion,” Composite Structures, 2001, vol. 52, No. 3-4, pp. 307-314. (Abstract). |
Byrd et al., “The estimate of the effect of z-pins on the strain release rate, fracture, and fatigue in a composite co-cured z-pinned double cantilever beam,” Composites Structures, 2005, vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 53-63. |
Key et al., “Progressive failure predictions for rib-stiffened panels based on multicontinuum technology,” Composite Structures, 2004, vol. 65, No. 3-4, pp. 357-366. |
Mouritz, “Review of z-pinned composite laminates,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2007, vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 2383-2397. |
Sheppard et al., “Rib separation in postbuckling stiffened shear panels,” Composite Structures, 1998, vol. 41, No. 3-4, pp. 339-352. |
Stickler et al., “Investigation of mechanical behavior of transverse stitched T-joints with PR520 resin in flexure and tenstion,” Composite Structures, 2001, vol. 52, No. 3-4, pp. 307-314. |
Locket et al., “Method of Manufacturing Resin Infused Composite Parts Using a Perforated Caul Sheet”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,630, 33 pages. |
EP examination communication dated May 6, 2013 regarding application 11187924.3-1706, reference NAM/P119089EP00, applicant The Boeing Company, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jul. 30, 2013, regarding Application No. PCT/US2011/063658, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120052247 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12823414 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13012162 | US |