The present invention relates to a table, more particularly to a composite table top.
The table is one of the most ubiquitous furniture pieces. The prior art table top panel is traditionally made of wood. The use of wood has disadvantages: firstly, consumption of large amount of wood is not environmentally friendly; secondly, wood needs constant maintenance and thirdly, wood may not be used in some applications. Wood substitutes such as fiberboard or flake board may also share similar defects.
To meet the needs of a modern household, a table top panel needs to be tough, durable, lightweight and appealing. As consumers look for more environment friendly alternatives, there are more and more examples of table top panels made of synthetic materials.
Blow molding has been used for manufacture synthetic table top. Blow molding is a manufacturing process by which hollow plastic parts are formed. The blow molding process begins with melting down the plastic and forming the plastic into a parison or preform. The parison is a tube-like piece of plastic with a hole in one end through which compressed air can pass. For table top, a large molding blow molding machine may be needed. In order to provide the required strength, the table top also needs sufficient thickness, resulting in the material overuse and heavy weight.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved table top made of a synthetic material with better applicability, low maintenance cost and better mechanical properties.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a composite table top. The table top comprises a top plate having an outer and an inner surface; a bottom plate comprising a plurality of projections, each of the plurality of projections having a top defining a top surface; and a pair of reinforcement inserts disposed at two opposite edges of the bottom plate. A sum of the top surfaces of the plurality of projections is 30%-70% of the upper surface of the bottom plate.
Preferably, the top surface has a size of 1 to 15 cm2.
Preferably, the sum of the top surfaces of the projections is 40%-60% of the upper surface of the reinforcement plate.
Preferably, the top surface has a size of 3 to 9 cm2.
Preferably, the bottom plate is produced through a vacuum forming process.
Preferably, the top plate has a downward flange, wherein the bottom plate has an upward flange and overlaps with the downward flange.
Preferably, the reinforcement inserts are located besides the upward flange and the downward flange.
Preferably, the reinforcement insert has an L-shaped cross-section, and covers a periphery of the bottom plate and the downward flange of the top plate.
Preferably, the projections have a trapezoidal prism form.
Preferably, the projections have a cylindrical form.
Preferably, the projections have a conical form.
Preferably, the projections have a isosceles trapezoidal prism form.
Preferably, the composite table top further comprises a second pair of reinforcement inserts.
Preferably, the reinforcement inserts form a unitary frame.
Preferably, the downward flange of the top plate and the upward flange of the bottom plate form a cavity to receive the reinforcement inserts.
Preferably, the composite table top further comprises a longitudinal beam or a transversal beam.
Preferably, the top surface of the projections is glued to the inner surface of the top plate.
Preferably, the bottom plate has an upward flange on the outer peripheral edges, wherein the upward flange includes an upward sloped surface, and a substantially vertical surface extending from the upward sloped surface, wherein the reinforcement inserts have a corresponding upper support surface abutting the downward sloped surface, and a corresponding lower support surface supporting the upward sloped surface.
Preferably, the projections are spaced at an equal distance.
Preferably, bases of the projections are adjacent.
These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:
Projections 112 are arranged in a rectangular array, or a matrix, on the upper surface of the reinforcement plate 108. The projections 112 in
Referring to
The trapezoidal prism has four sidewalls 122, which taper towards the top surface 114 of the trapezoidal prism. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, each of the top surface 114 of the projections 112 has a size of 1 to 15 cm2.
It should be apparent to a person skilled in the art that not all projections 112 on the upper surface of the reinforcement plate 108 need to be bonded to the inner surface of the face plate 102. For example but not limited to, bonding of alternate top surfaces 114 of the projections 112 may be sufficient. Pipes with a square cross section may be used to form the reinforcement frame 106 that is between the face plate 102 and the reinforcement plate 108. Every projection 112 forms a concave pit in the lower surface of the reinforcement plate 108.
In this disclosure, the term “projection” is mostly used. However, it should be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the term “projection” is from the direction of the face plate 102, as indicated by the arrow 204 in
Referring to
Referring to
The top face plate 1002 may be formed by blow molding process or other suitable processes known to a person skilled in the art. The top face plate 1002 has an inner surface 1014 and an outer surface 1012. The top face plate 1002 may further have a downward flange 1010.
Referring to
Now referring to
The bottom plate 1004 comprises a plurality of projections 1016, when viewed from the direction as indicated by arrow 1020. When viewed from the opposite direction, the same formations could be considered as projections.
The projections 1016 may be aligned in rows, in columns or both. The projections 1016 may be offset. The term “offset” is used to describe an alignment of the projections 1016 when the projections 1016 are aligned in a direction but not in a perpendicular direction. The projections 1016 bottom plate 1004 may be formed by, for example but not limited to, the vacuum forming process. Other processes, for example, injection molding, may also be used.
Referring to
The sum of the surfaces the projection tops 1202 is a fraction of the total surface of the bottom plate 1004. Preferably, the sum of the surfaces of the tops 1202 is about 30%-70% of the total surface of the bottom plate 1004. In one embodiment, each of the tops 1202 of the projections 1016 has a size of 1 to 15 cm2. Preferably, the height of the projections 1016 is between 0.5 and 20 mm.
Referring to
Now referring to
Advantageously, the bottom plate of the present invention has a plurality of projections. The projections may be arranged in matrix or in rows which are offset. The tops of the projections abut the inner surface of the top face plate. The tops and the sidewalls of the projections can distribute the pressure coming from the top face plate, improving the top plate's ability to withstand the pressure stress. Therefore, the thickness of the top plate can be reduced.
Advantageously, the reinforcement inserts are embedded around the edges of the table top, for increasing the strength of the periphery of the table top. The reinforcement inserts may be made of metal, and may be used for connecting the table legs.
Advantageously, the reinforcement inserts may be unitary to form a frame, further increasing the strength of the table top.
Advantageously, the sum of the surfaces of the tops of the projections is about 30%-70% of the total surface of the bottom plate. The contact area of the top surfaces reinforces the strength of the table top.
Advantageously, the size of the tops of the projections is about 1 to 15 cm2. Therefore, the relative small size of the top surface allows an increase of the number of the projections, resulting in an increase of the sidewall surface and therefore the strength of the table top.
Advantageously, the shape of the projections may be cylindrical, or conical for better pressure resistance. The height of the projections may range from 0.5 to 20 mm to provide better manufacturability and pressure resistance.
Advantageously, the table top may further include a beam, either transversal or longitudinal, for increasing the strength of the table top.
Advantageously, the bottom plate may be manufactured through a vacuum forming process, to provide an efficient process. The product made by vacuum forming process has less shrinkage and better uniformity.
Advantageously, the top plate may be glued to the bottom plate to increase the stability of the table top.
Advantageously, the sloped surfaces on the peripheries of the top plate and the bottom plate provide better thickness uniformity of the top plate and the bottom plate, reduce the stress on the flanges, and prevent deformation of the table top.
The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described. Changes and modifications may be made to such embodiments without departing from the true scope of the invention. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/277,868, filed Feb. 15, 2019 and now pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/842,461, filed Dec. 14, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,206,497, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/667,525, filed Aug. 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,867,458, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/049,582, filed Oct. 9, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,808,081, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/192,849, filed on Jul. 28, 2011 and now abandoned. The above-listed applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1979309 | Beiger | Nov 1934 | A |
2739640 | Brinker et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
3439634 | Bender | Apr 1969 | A |
3676279 | Beaver | Jul 1972 | A |
5271338 | Bonham et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5303824 | Kohn | Apr 1994 | A |
5335605 | Drabczyk | Aug 1994 | A |
5357872 | Wilmore | Oct 1994 | A |
5497597 | Elzenbeck | Mar 1996 | A |
5606755 | Romein | Mar 1997 | A |
5694865 | Raab | Dec 1997 | A |
5732637 | Raab | Mar 1998 | A |
5752091 | Kai et al. | May 1998 | A |
5835661 | Tai et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868081 | Raab | Feb 1999 | A |
5947037 | Hornberger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6058853 | Pinch | May 2000 | A |
6058854 | Tarnay et al. | May 2000 | A |
6371034 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6666152 | Tsai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6752091 | Glover et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6817662 | Winter et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7140308 | Tsai | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7735915 | Nye et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
D668483 | Bennett | Oct 2012 | S |
8387544 | Lee | Mar 2013 | B1 |
9504314 | Leng et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9808081 | Leng | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9867458 | Leng | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10206497 | Leng | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20030183135 | Tsai | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200904 | Strong | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213414 | Strong | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213416 | Strong et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040187744 | Wang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050274306 | Strong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080092788 | Leng | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098936 | Strong | May 2008 | A1 |
20080264307 | Vannimwegen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265307 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090324872 | Leng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100043681 | Leng | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100112265 | Leng | May 2010 | A1 |
20110174197 | Seger | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110203493 | Ashby et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130025508 | Leng | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20190021484 | Leng | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2517302 | Oct 2002 | CN |
201299266 | Sep 2009 | CN |
103239011 | Aug 2013 | CN |
103284471 | Sep 2013 | CN |
205093820 | Mar 2016 | CN |
Entry |
---|
CNIPA, International Search Report for PCT/CN2016/098798. dated Oct. 28, 2016. 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200022490 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16277868 | Feb 2019 | US |
Child | 16534988 | US | |
Parent | 15842461 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16277868 | US | |
Parent | 15667525 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 15842461 | US | |
Parent | 14049582 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 15667525 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13192849 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14049582 | US |