A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Be it known that we, Brian E. Higginbotham, a citzen of the United States, residing at 406 Westside Heights Dr., Tullahoma, Tenn.; and Terry Sutherland, a citizen of Canada residing in Ottawa, Canada, have invented a new and useful “Composite Wrap Bat.”
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the construction of baseball and softball bats, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to lighter and stronger bat constructions provided by the use of an external composite wrap on a portion of a metal bat frame.
2. Description of the Prior Art
One recent advancement in the design of high performance baseball and softball bats includes the use of an external metal shell formed about, an internal tubular bat frame as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,053,828, by Pitsenberger for “Softball Bat With Exterior Shell”, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the details of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The prior art has also included a number of other proposals for bat designs including internal and external sleeves, some of which have been constructed from composite materials.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,095 assigned to Easton, Inc., discloses a tubular metal bat having an internal fiber composite sleeve.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,022,282 issued to Kennedy et al., discloses a ball bat having an internal metal tube surrounded by an external composite tube along its entire length (see FIG. 3).
U.S. Pat. No. 5,722,908 discloses a composite bat with a metal barrel area.
Upon review of these prior art designs, it will be seen that none of them show or suggest the use of a composite external layer along only a portion of the bat for either the strengthening of the bat at a point of maximum bending moment, or for increasing the external durability of the bat to reduce denting and the like upon impact with a ball.
The present invention provides several alternative designs for a bat including a metal frame with an exterior fiber reinforced composite shell.
In one embodiment, the bat includes a metal frame having a fiber reinforced composite outer shell formed directly about the barrel portion of the bat. Preferably, the metal frame includes a handle portion, a transition portion and a barrel portion, with the metal frame having an annular step defined therein distally of the handle portion. The fiber reinforced composite outer shell is formed about the metal frame and has a proximal end located adjacent the annular step of the metal frame.
In a second embodiment of the invention, the barrel portion of the bat includes an outer metal shell formed about the barrel portion of the frame, with a fiber reinforced composite outer shell formed about the outer metal shell.
In still a third embodiment of the invention, a fiber reinforced composite outer shell is formed around only an intermediate portion of the metal frame spanning a point of maximum bending stress, so as to provide increased stiffness of the bat at the area of the point of maximum bending stress. The metal frame of the bat extends both proximally and distally from the intermediately located fiber reinforced composite outer shell.
Methods of manufacturing bats utilizing a composite wrapped exterior shell are also disclosed.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide improved baseball and softball bats having selected portions of a metal bat frame reinforced by an exterior fiber reinforced composite shell.
Another object of the present invention is the provision of bats having a lighter, yet stronger, construction than conventional bat designs.
Still another object of the present invention is the provision of a bat having a metal bat frame which is selectively reinforced at selected portions thereof by a fiber reinforced composite outer shell.
Still another object of the present invention is the provision of bats having improved durability and resistance to denting.
And another object of the present invention is the provision of bats having improved performance characteristics so that they will hit a ball further.
And another object of the present invention is the provision of improved methods for construction of bats having a metal frame with an exterior composite layer.
Other and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following disclosure when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now the drawings, and particularly to
The bat frame 11 can be generally described as having a proximal end 18 and a distal end 20.
As seen in
A fiber reinforced composite outer shell 24 is formed about the metal frame 11. The outer shell 24 has a proximal end 26 located adjacent the annular step 22 of the metal frame 11.
The fiber reinforced composite outer shell 24 terminates distally of the handle portion 12 so that the handle portion 12 is not covered by the outer shell 24.
As seen in
The distal end 20 of the bat 10 is preferably closed by a conventional end plug (not shown).
A knob 33 is attached, typically by welding, to the proximal end 18 of the bat frame 11.
In the embodiments of
The outer shell 24 is preferably formed of a bidirectional fiber reinforced sock placed about barrel portion 14. The details of construction of the sock 36 are further illustrated and described with reference to
Suitable material for the bidirectional fiber reinforced sock exterior layer 36 includes woven fiberglass or carbon fiber or like materials.
Suitable resin matrix material for impregnating the fiber layers includes two-part epoxy resin with various rubber materials added for greater impact resistance.
In this manner, a bat is provided which can have a much thinner metal barrel portion 14 than would a traditional bat, thus providing a lighter bat, which provides the necessary additional strength via the fiber reinforced composite exterior shell 24.
For example, a satisfactory bat like that illustrated in
With this construction wherein the barrel portion of the bat is surrounded by a fiber reinforced composite outer shell, the outer shell reduces denting of the barrel portion of the bat when used to strike a ball.
As seen in
As shown in
An alternative version of the fiber reinforced composite outer shell may also include an inner layer (not shown) of unidirectional fiber reinforced tape, such as a carbon fiber tape, which is wrapped around the barrel portion 14 of bat frame 11 prior to placement of the sock 36 about the layer of unidirectional wrapped tape. Any other conventional constructions of fiber reinforced composite materials may be utilized.
Turning now to
Thus, after formation of the outer metal shell 46 about the metal bat frame 11 in a manner like that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,053,828, the fiber reinforced composite outer shell 24 is formed upon the outer metal shell 46 in a manner like that just described with regard to the embodiment of
With the embodiment of
With the embodiment of
In one preferred example of a bat constructed as shown in
More generally, a bat constructed as shown in
It will be understood that for any given design of a bat, the bat frame will have a point along its length which is subjected to a maximum bending stress when the bat is used to strike a ball. For example, the bat shown in
The present invention also envisions the selective strengthening of a metal bat by the placement of a fiber reinforced composite outer shell 48 only around an intermediate portion 50 of the bat frame which spans the point x—x of maximum bending stress, so as to provide increased stiffness of the bat in the area of maximum bending stress.
With reference to
Again, such a construction can allow a given bat to be made of a thinner wall thickness metal material than would a traditional metal bat. One specific example of such a bat would have an aluminum bat frame 11 having a wall thickness in the area x—x of approximately 0.085 inches, reinforced by a fiber reinforced composite outer layer shell 48 having a wall thickness of 0.030 inches. More generally, such a bat can be described as an aluminum metal bat having a wall thickness at point x—x or in the intermediate portion 50 in the range of 0.050 to 0.100 inches, and having a composite outer shell 48 with a wall thickness in the range of 0.020 to 0.100 inches.
With this construction, the outer shell 48 is formed only about the intermediate portion 50 of the bat frame 11 so that the bat frame 11 extends both distally and proximally out of the outer shell 48. In this construction, the primary purpose of the fiber reinforced composite outer layer 48 is to strengthen the bat in its zone of maximum bending stress.
The selective use of strategically positioned fiber reinforced composite outer layers on a metal bat provide a number of advantages over bats constructed solely of metal. Using composite materials allows the designer more flexibility in the design of the bat. This design flexibility covers virtually all parameters that add value to a bat, including performance, durability and weight. More specifically, composite materials allow the bat to be designed for varying stiffness at desired locations, weight savings for either lighter weight or a variety of weight distributions, and strength increases for durability gains.
Thus, it is seen that the apparatus and methods of the present invention readily achieve the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those inherent therein. While certain preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described for purposes of the present disclosure, numerous changes in the arrangement and construction of parts and steps may be made by those skilled in the art, which changes are encompassed within the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/571,018 filed May 15, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,260 entitled “Composite Wrap Bat” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1121189 | Lincoln | Dec 1914 | A |
2944820 | Paullus | Jul 1960 | A |
3129003 | Mueller et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
3184236 | Zens | May 1965 | A |
3433481 | Tanguay | Mar 1969 | A |
3598410 | Costopoulos | Aug 1971 | A |
3972528 | McCracken et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3997161 | Lemke, Jr. | Dec 1976 | A |
4014542 | Tanikawa | Mar 1977 | A |
4023801 | Van Auken | May 1977 | A |
4025377 | Tanikawa | May 1977 | A |
4032143 | Mueller et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4082277 | Van Auken | Apr 1978 | A |
4084819 | Van Auken | Apr 1978 | A |
4086115 | Sweet, Jr. et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4092025 | Yanagioka | May 1978 | A |
4113248 | Yanagioka | Sep 1978 | A |
4131701 | Van Auken | Dec 1978 | A |
4135035 | Branen et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4173670 | Van Auken | Nov 1979 | A |
4241115 | Temin | Dec 1980 | A |
4324400 | Tse | Apr 1982 | A |
4351786 | Mueller | Sep 1982 | A |
4361325 | Jansen | Nov 1982 | A |
4373718 | Schmidt | Feb 1983 | A |
4399992 | Molitor | Aug 1983 | A |
4413822 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4436305 | Fernandez | Mar 1984 | A |
4498672 | Bulla | Feb 1985 | A |
4505479 | Souders | Mar 1985 | A |
4537398 | Salminen | Aug 1985 | A |
4541629 | Witkowski | Sep 1985 | A |
4546976 | Jones | Oct 1985 | A |
4569521 | Mueller | Feb 1986 | A |
4572508 | You | Feb 1986 | A |
4579343 | Mortvedt | Apr 1986 | A |
4614341 | Fernandez | Sep 1986 | A |
4684131 | Mortvedt | Aug 1987 | A |
4705273 | Ament et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720104 | DiSieno | Jan 1988 | A |
4732383 | Ferrari et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4746117 | Noble et al. | May 1988 | A |
4763900 | Carr | Aug 1988 | A |
4834370 | Noble et al. | May 1989 | A |
4848745 | Bohannan et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4923541 | Burger | May 1990 | A |
4928965 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 1990 | A |
4981737 | Rico | Jan 1991 | A |
5077106 | Dursch et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083780 | Walton et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5088735 | Shigetoh | Feb 1992 | A |
5093162 | Walton et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104123 | Okitsu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5114144 | Baum | May 1992 | A |
5131651 | You | Jul 1992 | A |
5165686 | Morgan | Nov 1992 | A |
5180163 | Lanctot et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5217221 | Baum | Jun 1993 | A |
5217223 | Feeney | Jun 1993 | A |
5219163 | Watson | Jun 1993 | A |
5301940 | Seki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5364095 | Easton et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380003 | Lanctot | Jan 1995 | A |
5395108 | Souders et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409214 | Cook | Apr 1995 | A |
5458330 | Baum | Oct 1995 | A |
5460369 | Baum | Oct 1995 | A |
5511777 | McNeely | Apr 1996 | A |
5533723 | Baum | Jul 1996 | A |
5593158 | Filice et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5620179 | MacKay, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624114 | Kelsey | Apr 1997 | A |
5624115 | Baum | Apr 1997 | A |
5676609 | Mollebaek | Oct 1997 | A |
5676610 | Bhatt et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5722908 | Feeney et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5759113 | Lai et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
D398680 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 1998 | S |
5800293 | MacKay, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820438 | Horton, III | Oct 1998 | A |
5833561 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6022282 | Kennedy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036610 | Lewark | Mar 2000 | A |
6042493 | Chauvin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053828 | Pitsenberger | Apr 2000 | A |
6139451 | Hillerich et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159116 | Pitsenberger | Dec 2000 | A |
6344007 | Feeney et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6440017 | Anderson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461260 | Higginbotham | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20010046910 | Sutherland | Nov 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
406091026 | Apr 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09571018 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10232845 | US |