Composition for a novel grade for cutting tools

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10781141
  • Patent Number
    10,781,141
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 17, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 22, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
A hard metal composition of material comprised of, in weight percent, an alloy of from 6-15% of cobalt content; a molybdenum content of from 5-15% of the cobalt content and a chromium carbide content of from 0-15% of the cobalt content and the balance of tungsten carbide.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

A hard metal composition of material comprised of, in weight percent, an alloy having a content of from 6-15% of cobalt; a molybdenum content of from 5-15% of the cobalt content and a chromium carbide content of from 0-15% of the cobalt content and the balance of tungsten carbide.


SUMMARY

In an embodiment, a hard metal composition of material is comprised of, in weight percent, an alloy having a content of from 6-15% of cobalt; a molybdenum content of from 5-15% of the cobalt content and a chromium carbide content of from 0-15% of the cobalt content and the balance of tungsten carbide.


The hard metal composition has a hard phase composed of one or more carbides, nitrides or carbonitrides selected from the group of tungsten, titanium, chromium, vanadium, tantalum, niobium, molybdenum or an equivalent material, or a combination thereof, bonded by a binder phase.


The hard metal composition has a binder phase is selected from the group of cobalt, nickel, iron, molybdenum and combinations thereof.


In an embodiment, the hard metal composition has a chromium content of from 5% to 15% of the cobalt content.


In an embodiment, the molybdenum is 15% and the chromium carbide is 15% of the cobalt content.


In an embodiment, the material has an increased hardness and a limited decrease in toughness.


In an embodiment, the material has a toughness to hardness ratio increase of at least 5%.


In an embodiment, a cutting tool of a hard metal composition of material is comprised of, in weight percent, an alloy of from 6-15% of cobalt; a molybdenum content of from 5-15% of the cobalt content and a chromium carbide content of from 0-15% of the cobalt content and the balance of tungsten carbide.


In an embodiment, a method of producing a hard metal composition of material comprises the steps of providing an alloy having a content of from 6-15 wt % of cobalt; providing of from 5% to of 15% of the cobalt content of molybdenum; providing of from 0% to of 15% of the cobalt content of chromium carbide; providing the balance of tungsten carbide; milling the molybdenum, chromium carbide, tungsten carbide and cobalt into a powder mixture; and sintering the powder mixture under pressure.


The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the embodiments, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. It should be understood that the embodiments depicted are not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an electron microscope image of a 1.0 wt % Mo, 0.5 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material.



FIG. 2 is an electron microscope image of a 0.5 wt % Mo, 1.5 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material



FIG. 3 is an electron microscope image of a 1.5 wt % Mo, 1.5 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material.



FIG. 4 is an electron microscope image of a 0.5 wt % Mo, 0.5 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material.



FIG. 5 is an electron microscope image of a 1.5 wt % Mo, 1.0 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material.



FIG. 6 is an electron microscope image of a 1.5 wt % Mo, 0.5 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material.



FIG. 7 is an electron microscope image of a 1.0 wt % Mo, 1.5 wt % Cr3C2 in 10 wt % Co fine grained cemented carbide material.



FIG. 8 is a thermomechanical analysis (TMA) curve showing the shrinkage rate difference between samples having high Cr content.



FIG. 9 is a thermomechanical analysis (TMA) curve showing the shrinkage rate difference between samples having lower Cr content.



FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the relationship between hardness and toughness of the tests variants.



FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the relationship between hardness and toughness of the tests variants.



FIGS. 12(a) and 12(b) are plots representing the Mo additions versus responses in hardness and Shetty fracture toughness.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A hard composition of material, such as cemented carbide, is appropriate as a substrate for metal cutting applications as it offers a unique combination of strength, hardness and toughness. As referred to herein a hard metal composition refers to a composite material normally having a hard phase composed of one or more carbides, nitrides or carbonitrides of tungsten, titanium, chromium, vanadium, tantalum, niobium, molybdenum or an equivalent material, or a combination thereof, bonded by a binder or metallic phase typically cobalt, nickel, iron, molybdenum or combinations thereof in varying proportions. The hardness of cemented carbide depends upon the concentration and contiguity of the hard phase. For example, the higher the concentration of tungsten carbide the greater the hardness.


Cemented carbide grades can be classified according to the binder phase content and WC grain size. Different types of grades have been defined as fine, medium, medium course and coarse. As referred to herein, a fine grade can be defined as a material with a binder content of from 3% to 20% and a grain size of less than about 1 μm, with nano, ultrafine and submicron fine grades having grain sizes of less than 0.1 μm, from 0.1 to 0.5 μm and from 0.5 to 1 μm, respectively.


The hard composition of material can be manufactured as ready to press (RTP) powder for pressing and sintering into components. The material can have tungsten carbide (WC) as the hard phase and cobalt (Co) as the binder phase. Molybdenum has been found to have good solubility in the cobalt binder of cemented carbide. Molybdenum has also been used for many years in cermet materials to increase toughness. The stacking fault energy for molybdenum is low, as for cobalt, which could possibly increase its creep resistance at higher temperatures.


According to one aspect, molybdenum (Mo) and chromium carbide (Cr3C2) are added as inhibitors and for alloying of the binder phase. The grain growth inhibiting properties of molybdenum, although not as strong as chromium, can be added in significant amounts along with chromium to WC—Co alloys.


The present disclosure relates to fine grained cement carbide having tungsten carbide (WC) as the hard phase and cobalt (Co) as the binder phase, having from 6-15 wt % Co content, a Mo content of from 5-15% of the Co content and a Cr3C2 content of from 0-15% of the Co content.


An advantage of this composition is that grain growth of the WC is inhibited without reducing the strength of the binder and thereby reducing edge chipping at metal cutting operations.


Example 1

Experimentation was performed evaluating the properties of Mo content of from 0.5 to 1.5 wt % combined with a Cr3C2 content of from 0.5 to 1.5% in a fine grained cemented carbide containing 10 wt % Co. Some of the variants show promising fracture toughness to hardness ratio, although the values are within the spread of the measurement methods.


An aim of the experimentation was to examine how Mo, along with Cr, would affect the properties of fine grained cemented carbides. For this purpose, a screening test of different Mo and Cr contents in a submicron WC alloy composition containing 10 wt % Co was set up. Samples were randomized in order to minimize effect of subjective human errors.


The materials were made in 100 g lots by lab milling WC, Co, Mo, Cr3C2 and PEG in ethanol for 8 hours. The materials where sintered at 1410° C. by sinter/HIP at 50 bar. The samples were polished, etched and Hc, Corn, density, HV30 and K1c properties measured. Because of the sensitivity of K1c measurements, all samples were re-measured after extra polishing.


A full X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis of the Cr, Mo and Co content of all samples was made in order to confirm the actual composition and give a precise evaluation of the results. SEM photographs of some of the microstructures are shown in FIGS. 1-7. Metallographic results from test variants are shown in Table 1, where samples 1, 7 and 8 are all repeats of the same composition.


















TABLE 1









K1c
K1c






Sample no
Cr3C2
Mo
HV30
Anstis
Shetty
Hc
Com
Density
























1
1
1
1620
12.0
10.8
21.4
6.1
14.29



10
0.5
1.5
1660
12.5
10.8
22.7
6.3
14.25
FIG. 6


11
1.5
1
1640
11.7
10.3
22.5
6.3
14.22
FIG. 7


2
0.5
1
1570
13.1
10.8
20.1
7.5
14.35
FIG. 1


3
1.5
0.5
1661
11.7
10.4
20.9
6.6
14.21
FIG. 2


4
1.5
1.5
1710
10.4
9.8
26.0
5.3
14.22
FIG. 3


5
0.5
0.5
1580
13.3
11.0
20.7
7.0
14.34
FIG. 4


6
1
1.5
1670
12.0
10.6
23.5
6.0
14.23
FIG. 5


7
1
1
1660
12.0
10.5
22.7
6.1
14.31


8
1
1
1670
10.9
9.9
24.4
5.8
14.10


9
1
0.5
1631
11.6
10.2
21.3
6.7
14.32









In samples 3 and 10, a third phase precipitation was apparent in the microstructure. Carbon analysis of sintered samples 1, 2, 3, 10 and 11 showed that the carbon content in these samples was comparable to the recipes calculated, as shown in Table 2. For samples 3 and 10, it can be supposed that the precipitation was not caused by a lack of carbon.














TABLE 2







1
3
10
5






















Total carbon (%)
5.46
5.51
5.50
5.45



Recipe total carbon (%)
5.50
5.59
5.52
5.55










Referring to FIGS. 8 and 9, thermomechanical Analysis (TMA) curves show shrinkage rate difference between samples having high Cr content and low Cr content. As shown in FIG. 8, at a high Cr content (1-1.5 wt %) the displacement curve is very sharp and fast, with a maximum rate at approximately 1280° C. As shown in FIG. 9, for a low Cr content sample (0.5 wt %) the displacement curve has two separate peaks, one at approximately 1250° C. and one at approximately 1330° C., which suggests that the Mo content is affecting the shrinkage in a more pronounced way and that the melting is of a more sluggish nature.


The relationship between hardness and toughness of the tests variants is shown graphically in FIGS. 10 and 11. The K1c and HV30 of different compositions are shown with the Cr3C2 content labeled as the first value and the Mo content as the second value in the table. Three outlier points with elevated K1c values were observed for some of the compositions with higher Mo additions and having the same hardness.


The hardness to toughness ratio can be determined as follows:

=(K1cH−K1cL)/K1cL

where

    • K1cH is the average K1c of a sample having a higher Mo content
    • K1cL is the average K1c of a sample having a lower Mo content.















TABLE 3





Sample



K1c
K1c



no
Cr3C2
Mo
HV30
Anstis
Shetty
Avg K1c





















1
1
1
1620
12.0
10.8
11.4


2
0.5
1
1570
13.1
10.8
11.95


3
1.5
0.5
1661
11.7
10.4
11.05


4
1.5
1.5
1710
10.4
9.8
10.1


5
0.5
0.5
1580
13.3
11.0
12.15


6
1
1.5
1670
12.0
10.6
11.3


7
1
1
1660
12.0
10.5
11.25


8
1
1
1670
10.9
9.9
10.4


9
1
0.5
1631
11.6
10.2
10.9


10
0.5
1.5
1660
12.5
10.8
11.65


11
1.5
1
1640
11.7
10.3
11









Referring to Table 3, in samples 3 and 10 there is a 5.4% increase in toughness. With samples 6 and 8 the percentage differences rises to 8.7%. Accordingly, at least a 5% increase in toughness to hardness ratio is achieved.


A plot using MODDE® software (Umetrics, Umea, SE), representing the Mo additions versus responses in hardness and Shetty fracture toughness are shown in FIGS. 12(A) and 12(B). The result indicates that a large amount of Mo, i.e., up to 1.5 wt %, can be added without significant decrease in toughness. This can be seen as the iso-toughness lines are flat as the Mo content is increased.


The above shows that a relatively high amount of Mo can be dissolved into Co. The inhibition effect also seems small based on the Hc values achieved. It should be appreciated that comparison of the variants is subject to the slight differences in their binder volumes.


Example 2

Experimentation was performed with a variant containing of 1.5 wt % Mo and 0.5 wt % Cr3C2 (EFP006) having an eta-phase. FIG. 3 is an electron microscope image of this sample.


Table 4 shows examples from interrupted cutting in stainless steel with the material Mo+Cr+WC+Co alloy (named EFP006) and the reference without Mo addition (H10F reference (89.5% WC008, 0.5% Cr3C2, 10% Co)). The number of cuts until edge chipping occurred on uncoated samples.














TABLE 4







Edge No
HF
H10F reference
EFP006









1
  2 cuts
  5 cuts
  7 cuts



2
2
4
 6



3
4
2
10



Mean
2.7 cuts
3.7 cuts
7.7 cuts










Example 3

Experimentation was performed on variants with different cobalt contents. The Mo additions were scaled with the cobalt content in the range of 5-15% of the cobalt content.


The materials were made in 100 g lots by lab milling the powders and PEG in ethanol/water for 8 hours. Molybdenum was added in the form of Mo2C. The materials where sintered at 1410° C. by sinter/HIP at 50 bar, then the samples were polished and then HV30 and K1c properties measured. The recipes used and measurements of hardness and toughness are shown in table 5.



















TABLE 5







H6f-
H6F-
H6f-
H10F-
H10F-
H10F-
H15f-
H15F-
H15F-



lMo
baseline
hMo
lMo
baseline
hMo
lMo
baseline
hMo

























WC
93.4
93.7
92.8
89
89.5
88
83.5
84.25
82


(wt %)


Co
6
6
6
10
10
10
15
15
15


(wt %)


Mo
0.3
0
0.9
0.5
0
1.5
0.75
0
2.25


(wt %)


Cr3C2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.75
0.75
0.75


(wt %)


Mo/Co
0.05
0
0.15
0.05
0
0.15
0.05
0
0.15


HV30
1830
1790
1840
1580
1595
1660
1400
1380
1410


K1C
9.4
9.5
9.3
11.0
11.0
10.8
13.2
15.1
12.7


(shetty)









It can be seen that in all cases the additions of the Mo both at the 0.05 and 0.15 Mo/Co ratio has resulted in hardness, with a slight reduction in toughness, compared to the baseline. As a similar response in material properties has been observed as for the 10% binder examples similar changes in performance can be expected from these materials.


It is also known that Co can dissolve Mo during sintering, but after cooling retained Mo might lead to reduced binder ductility and lower fracture toughness. Therefore inclusion of Mo (and probably Cr also) in carbide grade compositions should be regarded essentially as adding to the hard phase rather than providing an extra constituent to the ductile binder. Co is the key provider of ductility to hard metals, grade toughness being determined by Co volume fraction in relation to all other ingredients.


It should be appreciated that a variety of combinations of Co and Mo within the disclosed ranges, as well as other ranges, is contemplated and that the application should not be limited to just those combinations disclosed.


The effect upon grade toughness of partially replacing Co with Mo (up to ˜2 vol %) in Co—Cr3C2-sub-micron WC hard metal has been studied. Results of these studies show that hardness increased moderately and K1c decreased slightly with increasing replacement of Co by Mo.


Average edge toughness, as represented by number of interrupted facing cuts on austenitic stainless steel tube, decreased with increasing replacement of Co by Mo. This agreed with K1c the trend. Spread in individual cutting life results was rather wide, implying that extrinsic factors could have had some influence.


Cobalt is the key provider of ductility in hard metal. Volume fractions of other ingredients, such as those grain growth inhibitors with high solubility in Co should not be regarded as equivalent to Co in providing ductility to the grade.


Although the present embodiment(s) has been described in relation to particular aspects thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred therefore, that the present embodiment(s) be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A hard metal composition of material, consisting of: cobalt in an amount of from 6-15 wt %;molybdenum in an amount of from 5-15% of the cobalt content;chromium carbide in an amount of from 5-15% of the cobalt content; anda balance of tungsten carbide.
  • 2. The hard metal composition according to claim 1, wherein the molybdenum content is 15% and the chromium carbide content is 15% of the cobalt content.
  • 3. The hard metal composition according to claim 1, wherein the material has a grain size of less than 1 μm.
  • 4. The hard metal composition according to claim 1, wherein the material has a hardness of 1570 HV30 to 1710 HV30 and a toughness of 9.8 K1c (Shetty) to 11.0 K1c (Shetty).
  • 5. A cutting tool comprising a hard metal composition of material, the material consisting of: cobalt in an amount of from 6-15 wt %;molybdenum in an amount of from 5-15% of the cobalt content;chromium carbide in an amount of from 5-15% of the cobalt content; anda balance of tungsten carbide.
RELATED APPLICATION DATA

This application is a § 371 National Stage Application of PCT International Application No. PCT/IB2014/002828 filed Dec. 17, 2014 claiming priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/916,878, filed Dec. 17, 2013.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2014/002828 12/17/2014 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2015/092528 6/25/2015 WO A
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
6293986 Rodiger Sep 2001 B1
6413293 Grearson Jul 2002 B1
7490502 Pauty Feb 2009 B2
20020114981 Andersson Aug 2002 A1
20050072269 Banerjee Apr 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
1116248 Feb 1996 CN
S6176646 Apr 1986 JP
H07216492 Aug 1995 JP
2003155538 May 2003 JP
200476049 Mar 2004 JP
9620057 Jul 1996 WO
2005033348 Apr 2005 WO
2012098102 Jul 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
“Glossary of Metallurgical and Metalworking Terms,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online, ASM International, 2002, pp. 1, 36 , 120, 257. (Year: 2002).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160318811 A1 Nov 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61916878 Dec 2013 US