Composition for detecting biofilms on viable tissues

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11135315
  • Patent Number
    11,135,315
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 7, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A staining composition for use in making biofilm detectable on viable tissue wherein the composition preferentially stains the biofilm and comprises a staining agent in a quantity effective to stain the biofilm and render it detectable.
Description

This invention relates to a composition which can be applied to viable tissues such as chronic wounds (e.g. leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers), acute wounds (e.g. cuts, abrasions, burns), skin and bone for the detection of microbial biofilms as an early warning indicator for tissue at risk of infection. More particularly the invention relates to a composition capable of making biofilms on viable tissues observable while at the same time avoiding wound and skin irritation and retardation of healing. A further embodiment of the invention relates to a kit for use in the detection of biofilms on viable tissues.


Viable tissues are often colonised by a variety of microorganisms, some of which may cause infection. It is becoming increasingly accepted that chronic and acute wound healing is impaired by the presence of microorganisms colonising the wound. Compelling evidence is emerging that these microorganisms may exist in wounds primarily in the form of biofilms. During colonisation, bacteria and other microorganisms such as yeasts and fungi, attach firmly to tissue and form biofilm via the secretion of an extracellular matrix of polymeric substances. This mode of growth imparts a degree of protection to microorganisms within the biofilm in the form of physical protection from topical and systemic antimicrobial agents due to the surrounding matrix. It is also thought that microorganisms within biofilms have altered phenotypes and genotypes compared to their free-swimming, planktonic counterparts. Biofilm microorganisms are known to be metabolically less active, and as such this may also provide a degree of resistance to traditional antimicrobial approaches such as antibiotics, which are known to work against metabolically-active bacteria. Furthermore, the presence of biofilms in wounds also impedes the host immune system in the inflammatory microbial clearance, and the granulation and re-epithelialisation phases, of the normal wound healing process.


Consequently, there is a need to develop methods or devices to rapidly detect the presence of biofilm in viable tissues before and after selected treatment protocols. This would help researchers to understand if microorganisms live in the biofilm state on skin and in wounds, and to allow them to follow maturation or clearance of such biofilm communities. A biofilm detection method or device would also allow researchers to develop effective anti-biofilm strategies and effective wound healing protocols of care, and in clinical practice, it would guide selection of appropriate wound dressings and aid the monitoring of the effectiveness of a treatment protocol given by the wound care practitioner.


Biofilms are typically comprised of bacteria encased within an exopolymeric substance (or matrix) that consists of long-chain polysaccharides with complex linkages such as 1,3- or 1,4-β-linked hexose linkages (examples of some common biofilm polysaccharides are teichoic acid, ketal-linked pryruvates N-acetylglucosamine, and the uronic acids: D-guluronic, D-galacturonic and mannuronic acids), protein (of which some may play a structural role), DNA (extracellular, some of which may have a structural role), lipids, metal ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, etc.) and water. Biofilms may also be associated with devitalised host tissues such as slough and necrotic tissue.


Biofilm extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are also referred to as biofilm extracellular matrix or bacterial-derived tissue. Whilst biofilm is mainly water by weight and bacteria may only comprise 10-20% of the volume of biofilm, EPS constitutes the majority of the biomass/dry weight of biofilm.


Biofilms such as those found on teeth in the form of dental plaque, are often easy to visualise with the naked eye due to their thickness, colour and the nature of the substrate on which they form. Biofilm visualisation in, for example, a chronic or acute wound is not straightforward due to the colours present in the wound and the contents of the wound. Chronic and acute wounds are usually complex in terms of containing dead or devitalised tissue (slough), exudate, pus, blood, medicaments, dressing components, in addition to bacteria and biofilm. As such it may be difficult to detect the presence of a biofilm in a wound as the visualisation of wound biofilms by the naked eye is difficult. There is thus a need for a means to aid detection of the biofilm for instance by a composition which is able to preferentially stain wound biofilms so that they can be visualised. Once visualised, the biofilm can be treated appropriately.


Surprisingly we have found that it is possible to preferentially stain biofilms by the use of a composition comprising a stain which allows the detection of biofilm.


Accordingly a first aspect of the invention provides a staining composition for use in making biofilm on viable tissue detectable wherein the composition preferentially stains the biofilm and comprises a coloured or fluorescent staining agent in solution in a quantity effective to stain said biofilm and render it detectable.


Preferably the biofilm is made detectable by the naked eye or in conjunction with illumination and/or optical devices.


Preferably the staining agent is a dye which will selectively bind to EPS/bacteria and not to host viable tissue. The staining agent should not significantly stain non-biofilm components in, for example, a chronic or acute wound, such as wound tissue, surrounding skin, slough (dead or devitalized tissue), exudate, blood, pus, inflammatory cells (neutrophils, macrophages), cells involved in the healing process (fibroblasts, endothelial cells, keratinocytes), or medicaments or dressing components that may remain in the wound. Such a staining agent would preferably be a molecule of the required size and structure; for example, a low molecular weight, compact, planar molecule that is capable of diffusion through EPS and bacterial cell membranes. The staining agent may have anionic groups to give colour and possibly fluorescent properties; and may have cationic groups for charge interactions with negatively-charged biofilm EPS polysaccharides and bacterial cell walls. These charged groups should preferably be permanent charges so that they are not affected by the pH of applied formulations or the viable tissue/biofilm environment.


Such a staining agent is preferably of a suitable colour or brightness that it may be possible to observe the stained biofilm directly with the naked eye. However, due to the complex and highly pigmented nature of wounds some colours of stain might be difficult to observe. For example, in necrotic wounds, sloughy wounds, or bleeding wounds there may be hues of black, brown, red, yellow, etc. Whilst blue or green dyes may be considered preferable here, they may appear dark or black if located adjacent to or on brown, red or yellow-coloured tissue. Rather than relying solely on the observer being able to detect the stain with the naked eye, it is preferable to use a stain that can fluoresce so that it is more readily detectable. Many classes of compounds that are potential staining agents are also fluorescent, in that they are capable of absorbing photons of light of certain wavelengths and becoming electronically excited, emitting this light energy in the form of fluorescence. It is possible to detect such fluorescence using light filters that are tailored to the fluorescence emission spectra of relevant molecules so that the observer only views a narrow spectral band that corresponds to the wavelengths of fluorescence. For example, lenses with specific optical filters, such as those used in laser safety, could be used in conjunction with an appropriately-specific light source to detect fluorescence, thereby allowing detection of biofilm on viable tissues. This method of biofilm detection may have advantages over detection using the naked eye in that fluorescent detection is possible even for very thin biofilms, which may be only a few layers of microbial cells thick and does not rely solely on the stain itself being visible.


By preferentially staining it is meant that the staining agent selectively binds to the biofilm rather than the host viable tissue. In this way, the staining agent can be used simply to detect the biofilm by revealing the presence and location the biofilm. The staining agent becomes bound or adsorbed to extracellular biofilm matrix molecules as well as being bound or adsorbed to and/or taken up by the biofilm bacteria cells rather than the tissue of the wound. Preferably the staining of the biofilm by the staining agent reveals the presence of biofilm by making it detectable to the naked eye. For some staining agents the stained biofilm can be made to fluoresce, for instance by illumination with a light source. The fluorescence can make the stained biofilm more visible. The light source is selected to emit light of an appropriate wavelength such that the staining agent absorbs light energy in the form of photons to excite the staining agent and cause it to fluoresce. The observation of fluorescence may be enhanced using appropriate optical filters which exclude non-fluorescent wavelengths for the staining agent, for instance in the form of optically-filtered lenses.


The compositions according to a first aspect of the invention comprise one or more staining agents capable of preferentially staining biofilms. Preferably the staining agent is a dye, the biofilm-staining dye absorbing maximally in the visible region, more preferably 380 nm to 720 nm and even more preferably 500 nm to 600 nm, as this makes a wide range of light sources suitable for use with the composition of the invention or for inclusion in the kit of the invention.


Preferably the staining agent produces sufficient fluorescence for detection, such that a wavelength range suitable for excitation and a distinct and higher wavelength range suitable for fluorescence emission detection can be delivered from illumination devices and detected using optically-filtered lens devices.


Staining agents suitable for use in compositions of the invention are most preferably selected from those based upon organic chemical compounds, more likely to be those containing aromatic ring structures, for example benzene, or extended conjugation, for example in porphyrin or pheophorbides, more likely those with fused polycyclic hydrocarbons, for example naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthraline and pyrene, and most likely those also containing heterocyclic aromatic structures where the heterocyclic atom or atoms are oxygen, nitrogen or sulphur, or a mixture thereof, for example furan, thiophene, pyrrole, pyran, pyridine and oxazine.


These staining agents may also display the properties of fluorescence. Most appropriate are those that absorb and emit light of wavelengths in the visible electromagnetic spectrum (380 nm-720 nm). Such agents are likely to have chemical structures that contain an extended region of conjugation, for example fluorone and its derivatives (alternatively known as xanthenes and rhodamines) such as eosin, erythrosine, Rose Bengal, fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate, 5-chloromethyl fluorescein, 6-carboxy fluorescein, 2,7-Bis-(carboxy ethyl)-5(6)-carboxy fluorescein; Rhodamine B, Rhodamine 6 G, Rhodamine 123, Rhodamine iodoacetamide, Sulphorhodamine B, Sulphorhodamine 101, tetramethyl rhodamines or Texas Red. Derivatives of cyanine such as 3,3′-dihexadecylindocarbocyanines, 3,3′-dipropyloxadicrbocyanine, aluminium phthalocyanine disulphonate, aluminium tetrasulphophthalocyanine, aluminium phthalocyanines, zinc phthalocyanines, napthalocyanines, or the mucopolysaccharide stain Alcian Blue. Acridine and its derivatives such as Acriflavine, Aminacrine, 2-aminoacridine or 9-aminoacridine. Finally, appropriate agents may come from the classes of oxazine derivatives such as Nile Blue, Nile Red, Fura Red or Fura-2; quinolone and its derivatives; adenosine derivatives such as 2′3′-O-(2,4,6-trinotro-cyclohexadienylidine)adenosine 5′-triphosphate or 3′-O—(N-methylanthraniloyl)adenosine 5′-triphosphate; triarylmethanes such as Patent Blue V, Crystal Violet, Brilliant Blue or Fast Green; 5 phenothiaziniums such as Methylene Blue or Toluidine Blue O and its derivatives such as 1-methyl methylene blue or 1,9-dimethyl methylene blue; phenanthridine derivatives such as ethidium or hydroethidine; pheophorbide derivatives such as sodium pheophorbide; and porphyrin derivatives such as chlorin e6, benzoporphyrin derivatives, porphines, 10 meso-tetra porphines, hematoporphyrins or protoporphyrins.


The staining agent is preferably included in the composition at a level of from 0.0001% to 1% by weight, more preferably 0.0025% to 0.025% by weight, even more preferably 0.0025% to 0.01% by weight.


The compositions of the present invention may be in a form that lightly adheres to tissues and may be readily rinsed away after a short duration to aid visualisation of the stained biofilm. A viscous fluid, for instance a water- or glycerol-based gel (in the form of a gel applicator, spray or sheet), foaming mousse, cream or ointment would give intimate contact with a wound bed. Alternatively, a thin, soluble, cast film or a lyophilized, dissolving wafer could be used to provide intimate contact with a wound bed. In any such delivery system the formulation preferably should be easily rinsed away from viable tissues using a standard irrigant such as saline, for a few seconds.


In gel form, the composition may also comprise a viscosifier such as a cellulose derivative such hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), carboxymethyl cellulose or hydroxypropyl cellulose; gums; sugar/alcohol derivatives such as glycerol, sorbitol, maltitol, mannitol, maltodextrin or polydextrose; natural polymers such as gelatin, pectin, chitosan or alginate; synthetic polymers such as carbopol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, polyethylene glycol or poloxamers. Preferably the composition in gel form may comprise from 1 to 5% by weight of a viscosifier and most preferably HEC.


The composition of the invention may be in gel form and may also comprise a humectant such as propylene glycol (PG), glycerol, polyethylene glycol, polydextrose, sorbitol, triethanlolamine, cyclomethicone, ammonium lactate or glycerol ester. Preferably the composition comprises from 5% to 15% by weight of a humectant and most preferably PG.


Preferably the composition of the invention comprises excipients to optimise binding of the stain to biofilm. For instance, the composition of the invention may also comprise a metal chelating agent such as tetra sodium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, deferasirox, deferiprone, deferoxamine, deferazoxane, ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, gluonic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid or trisodium citrate at a level of 0.1 to 2.0% by weight, or an agent to assist penetration of the staining agent into the biofilm such as a surfactant for example Tween 80, Span 20, or coamidopropylbetaine (CAPD) and in particular a cationic quaternary ammonium surfactant such as dialkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, alkyl pyridinium chloride, benzalkonium chloride (BaCl), benzethonium chloride (BeCl), disodium cocamphodiacetate, cetyl morpholinium ethosulphate or an alkyl trimethyl ammonium chloride at a level of 0.1 to 1.0% by weight. The addition of a surfactant may also act as a foaming agent. For example, the surfactants BeCl, Tween 80, Span 20, CAPD, sodium C14-16 olefin sulfonate or Softisan 649 can act as foaming agents to give the formulation characteristics of a foaming mousse.


Preferably the composition of the invention has a pH in the range of from 5 to 7 and most preferably around 5.5.


Preferably the composition of the invention is in the form of a viscous fluid and comprises a viscosifier such as HEC, a humectant such as PG, a metal chelator such as EDTA, a surfactant such as BeCl and water and in particular 2.0% w/v hydroxyethylcellulose, 10.0% w/v propylene glycol, 0.5% EDTA, 0.5% BeCl and approximately 87% v/v sterile, distilled water. Alternatively, the compositions of the present invention could be in the form of a solution applied to the wound from a syringe, sachet, spray bottle, aerosol bottle, non-propellant pump bottle, brush or a gel sheet, film or dissolving wafer.


The formulation could be terminally sterilized by autoclaving or gamma irradiation. Alternatively, the formulation could be a preserved solution containing, for example preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin or parabens such as methyl-, ethyl- or propyl-paraben.


The composition of the present invention will be used primarily on viable tissues which show signs of clinical infection (inflammation, malodour, purulent exudate, hypoxia, etc.), may be at risk of infection, appear to have slough (host-derived tissue) or biofilm (bacteria-derived tissue) present, or are generally recalcitrant. The composition could also be used at dressing change, in order to detect biofilm, and also to monitor the efficacy of the treatment regime and direct future treatment via the reduction in detected biofilm.


A further aspect of the present invention relates to a kit of parts for use in the detection of biofilms on viable tissue, the kit comprising:

    • a composition comprising a staining agent which preferentially stains biofilms and
    • a light source capable of causing the staining agent to fluoresce.


Preferably the kit further comprises optical filters to enable the specific detection of fluorescence in the form of spectacles or integrated optical filters.


The light source may be a white light source such as tungsten, halogen or pulsed xenon lamp that is passed through a “short pass” filter. Preferably the light source is a monochromatic or narrow spectrum source that does not require filtering or attenuation such as a light emitting diode with an output that closely correlates with the spectral characteristics of the staining agent. As such the light source is preferably small, portable, hand-held and generates no or negligible heat. The light source may be multiple use or fully disposable.


Preferably the kit further comprises spectacles, or the light source contains an integrated lens, for use in detecting the biofilm wherein the spectacles or lens contain a filter to exclude all wavelengths of light below the absorption maxima (Absmax) of the staining agent. In this way the user is assisted in detecting the fluorescence of the staining agent present in the biofilm. More preferably the spectacles or lens filter is efficient at transmitting wavelengths of light corresponding to the fluorescence emission spectra of the staining agent. The spectacles can be multiple use or fully disposable (in the same way that an integrated lens in the light source could be).


Preferably the kit further comprises a wound irrigation solution for rinsing the viable tissue before and/or after illumination with the light source.


In an example of typical use, a composition according to the invention is applied to the whole wound or desired regions in order to achieve a thin but consistent layer of composition for instance 0.1 to 0.5 cm in thickness. The composition is left in place for 0.1 to 15 minutes, more preferably 0.5 to 2 minutes. Prior to any illumination, the formulation can be left in place or more preferably excess formulation is rinsed away from the wound using a suitable wound irrigation solution. Rinsing the excess formulation away can enable the staining to show where the biofilm is in the wound so that these areas can be treated for example by curette.


The wound is then inspected for presence of preferentially stained biofilm. This may be done with the naked eye or the wound can be illuminated with a light source at a distance in the range of 1 to 50 cm. Preferably the light source is at a distance of 5 to 20 cm. The light source spectral output is selected to correspond to the fluorescence emission spectra of the staining agent; for example, for Rose Bengal, which has a fluorescence maxima of 575 nm, a suitable light source might emit wavelengths of 550-600 nm. This causes the agent in the stained biofilm to fluoresce. Preferably the user wears spectacles to observe the wound or observes the wound through an integrated lens in the light source. The spectacles or lens have a light filtration system which excludes wavelengths of light below the fluorescence emission range of the staining agent and allows any fluorescence to be seen remarkably clearly and specifically and thus, detection of any biofilm present.


Typically, treatment should take place at subsequent dressing changes. The wound can be further inspected for presence and reduction of biofilm with the naked eye or with the light source and spectacles or integrated lens. The wound can then be dressed with an appropriate primary and secondary dressing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. Initial screening of selected dyes as biofilm stains using biofilms grown in the CDFF (n=6).



FIG. 2a. Screening of selected dyes as biofilm stains using biofilms grown in the CDC biofilm reactor (n=9). Absorption data.



FIG. 2b. Screening of selected dyes as biofilm stains using biofilms grown in the CDC reactor (n=9). Concentration data.



FIG. 3. Rose Bengal with EDTA and BaCl (RBEB) stained (A-C) and control (D-E) samples of meat containing mixed S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms.



FIG. 4. S. aureous biofilm age vs dye concentration.



FIG. 5. P. aeruginosa biofilm age vs Rose Bengal concentration.





The following examples are illustrative of the present invention.


Example 1

Assessment of Biofilm Stains using the Constant-Depth Biofilm Fermenter


A constant depth biofilm fermenter (CDFF) was used to culture 4-day mixed biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Briefly, biofilms were formed in recesses in 15 PTFE pans around the rim of a rotating steel turntable onto which inoculum or sterile growth media was allowed to steadily drip. A scraper bar distributed bacterial inoculum or media over the pans as the turntable rotated, maintaining the biofilms at a steady depth. Each pan contained 5 removable plugs, 4 mm in diameter which were recessed to a depth of 300 μm. The resulting biofilms that grew in the plug recesses were reproducible in terms of appearance and microbiological composition and could be removed from the CDFF through a sampling port using sterile instruments. In duplicate, biofilm-containing pans were removed from the CDFF, rinsed once by dipping in sterile saline for 5 seconds, then incubated in 10 ml volumes of the following potential biofilm stains at 100 μM concentration in deionised water unless stated, in the dark for two minutes: Erythrosine; Rose Bengal; Fast Green; Rose Bengal with 2% w/v EDTA and 1% w/v benzalkonium chloride (BaCl) (RBEB); Rose Bengal with 2% w/v tetra sodium EDTA and 1% w/v benzalkonium chloride in a 2% w/v hydroxyethyl cellulose and 10% w/v propylene glycol gel (Gel-RBEB). Following another rinse in saline, six plugs for each stain were incubated overnight at 37° C. in 6 ml volumes of 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) in water for digestion. Samples were then spun at 13,000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the supernatant from digested cell debris. Absorption spectra of the aspired supernatants were then measured in a spectrophotometer and these spectra compared to spectra of known concentrations (100 μM) of each stain in 2% SDS.



FIG. 1 shows that Fast Green appeared to be the most effective stain of biofilms grown in the CDFF, closely followed by Rose Bengal with EDTA and BaCl in liquid form. The addition of the EDTA and BaCl excipients appeared to enhance the uptake of Rose Bengal into the biofilms.


Example 2

Assessment of Biofilm Stains using the CDC Biofilm Reactor


A Centre for Disease Control (CDC) biofilm reactor was used to culture 48 hour mixed biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Briefly, biofilms were formed on coupons on reactor rods which were held within the reactor vessel containing a continuously mixed culture of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa at 35° C. Biofilm-containing coupons were removed from the rods, rinsed once by dipping in sterile saline for 5 seconds, then incubated in 10 ml volumes of the following biofilm stains at 100 μM concentration in deionised water, in the dark for two minutes: Erythrosine; Rose Bengal; Alcian Blue; Rhodamine B; Rhodamine 123; Rose Bengal with 2% w/v EDTA and 1% w/v BaCl (RBEB). Following another rinse in saline, nine coupons for each stain were each added to 2 ml volumes of 2% SDS for stomaching at ‘high’ setting for 1 minute then incubated overnight in the dark at 37° C., for digestion. Samples were then spun at 13,000 rpm for 5 minutes to separate the supernatant from digested cell debris. Absorption spectra of the aspired supernatants were then measured in a spectrophotometer and these spectra compared to spectra of known concentrations (100 μM) of each stain in 2% SDS.



FIG. 2a shows how in terms of absolute absorption or ‘brightness’, RBEB was the most efficient biofilm stain, followed by the carbohydrate stain, Alcian Blue. The EDTA and/or BaCl appeared to enhance the uptake of Rose Bengal by more than 60%. When the same data was expressed as a ratio of measured absorption: absorption at 100 1.1M (i.e. concentration), Alcian Blue appeared to be the most effective biofilm stain.


Example 3

Assessment of Biofilm Stains using a Pork Belly Biofilm Model


A pork belly biofilm model was used to further assess biofilm stains. Pieces of pork belly were cut using a 20 mm bore and a 6 mm borer was used to create indentations in the centre of the samples. Samples were then sterilized by gamma irradiation. Samples were inoculated with 10 μl volumes of a ˜1×107 cfu/ml mixed suspension of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa then incubated at 35° C. in Parafilm-sealed Petri dishes for 72-96 hours. Samples that appeared to have visible biofilms in the central bore hole only were then stained by dipping the samples into 10 ml volumes of 100 μM Rose Bengal with 2% w/v EDTA and 1% w/v BaCl (RBEB) for two minutes with rinsing in saline before and after staining. Control samples were not stained and therefore only dipped in saline for 2 minutes. Samples were then photographed, examples of which are shown in FIG. 3. The three samples (AtoC) shown that were stained with RBEB clearly demonstrate the selective uptake of the stain by the biofilms which were contained within the indentations. The three control samples show that without this staining it is difficult to ascertain if and where biofilm is present in the samples.


Example 4

Rose Bengal Staining of Biofilms Crown using a Membrane Filter Biofilm Model


A membrane filter biofilm model was used to study the effect of Rose Bengal concentration on the efficacy of biofilm staining. Briefly, a 5 μl volume of a 5×105 cfu/ml suspension of S. aureus or P. aeruginosa was added to the centre of sterile membrane filter discs (pore size 0.2 μm; Anodisc, Whatman) which were placed onto 7 ml volumes of sterile Tryptic Soya Broth in lidded 6-well plates. Samples were incubated for 4 hours (immature biofilms), and 24 and 48 hours (mature biofilms), and excess planktonic cells were rinsed from the filters. The biofilms on the filters were stained by pipetting 2 ml volumes of Rose Bengal (60 μM or 300 μM) or saline (negative control) for 30 seconds, followed by rinsing. Rose Bengal was recovered from the biofilm samples by stomaching and overnight digestion in 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate, centrifugation, then measuring of absorption spectra in a UV-vis spectrophotometer. Rose Bengal uptake per sample was determined by comparison of absorption values with a standard curve of Rose Bengal in 2% SDS. Tables 1 and 2 show that mature S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms took up Rose Bengal in a dye concentration- and biofilm age-dependent manner. Only at the highest concentrations of 300 μM did the immature, 4-hour biofilms appear to be stained, although this was likely due to some staining of the filters themselves. FIGS. 4 and 5 show how mature, 48-hour biofilms of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa took up more Rose Bengal than 24-hour biofilms, and also that 300 μM Rose Bengal resulted in significantly more staining of the biofilms than 60 μM Rose Bengal. This simple method for quantifying the uptake of Rose Bengal by biofilms utilises the absorption spectra of the dye. Using the absorption spectra to quantify the dye is similar to detecting the fluorescence using a light source with optical filters. Uptake could then alternatively be observed qualitatively using the naked eye or by observing the fluorescence emission of the Rose Bengal in conjunction with a light source and optical filter.















TABLE 1





Age (h)
[RB] (μM)
1
2
3
Avg
S.D.





















4
0
0
0
0
0
0


4
60
0
0
0
0
0


4
300
1.59
1.45
1.64
1.56
0.10


24
0
0
0
0
0
0


24
60
1.66
1.72
2.17
1.85
0.28


24
300
4.82
4.55
3.95
4.44
0.45


48
0
0
0
0
0
0


48
60
1.22
1.12
1.37
1.24
0.12


48
300
6.26
5.18
5.71
5.72
0.54






















TABLE 2





Age (h)
[RB] (μM)
1
2
3
Avg
S.D.





















4
0
0
0
0
0
0


4
60
0
0
0
0
0


4
300
1.52
1.76
1.88
1.72
0.18


24
0
0
0
0
0
0


24
60
2.04
1.76
2.02
1.94
0.15


24
300
5.0.5
5.84
4.41
5.10
0.72


48
0
0
0
0
0
0


48
60
3.15
1.66
2.37
2.39
0.74


48
300
6.20
9.01
6.69
7.30
1.50








Claims
  • 1. A staining composition for use in making biofilm detectable on viable tissue that preferentially stains the biofilm rather than the viable tissue, the composition comprising: a staining agent in a quantity effective to stain the biofilm and render the biofilm detectable, wherein the staining agent is Rose Bengal,0.1 to 2.0% by weight EDTA,0.1 to 1.0% by weight of a surfactant, anda preservative in the form of methyl-paraben to provide preservative action in the composition,wherein the composition is a non-gelled composition, andwherein the composition is in the form of a lyophilized wafer.
  • 2. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition preferentially stains the biofilm by selectively binding to the biofilm rather than the viable tissue.
  • 3. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition allows detection of the biofilm by preferentially staining and revealing to the naked eye.
  • 4. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition allows detection of the biofilm by preferentially staining the biofilm with a staining agent which is capable of fluorescence.
  • 5. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the staining agent absorbs light of wavelengths from 380 nm to 720 nm.
  • 6. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition allows the detection of the biofilm by preferentially staining and revealing the biofilm when the biofilm is illuminated with light including wavelengths that cause the biofilm to fluoresce.
  • 7. A composition as claimed in claim 6, wherein the fluorescence is detectable with the naked eye or a light source and optical filters corresponding to the fluorescence emission spectra of the staining agent.
  • 8. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition comprises a humectant.
  • 9. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition comprises from 0.0001% to 1% by weight of Rose Bengal.
  • 10. A kit of parts for use in the detection of biofilms on viable tissue, the kit comprising: a composition including a staining agent which preferentially stains biofilms, 0.1 to 2.0% by weight EDTA, 0.1 to 1.0% by weight of a surfactant, and a preservative to provide preservative action in the composition, wherein the staining agent is Rose Bengal, wherein the composition is a non-gelled composition, wherein the composition is in the form of a soluble film, and wherein the preservative includes methyl-paraben, anda light source capable of causing the staining agent to fluoresce.
  • 11. A kit as claimed in claim 10, wherein the light source emits light in order to make the staining agent fluoresce.
  • 12. A kit as claimed in claim 10, comprising spectacles or lenses for use in detecting the biofilm wherein the spectacles or lenses act to exclude all wavelengths of light except those at which the staining agent fluoresces.
  • 13. A kit as claimed in claim 10, comprising a wound irrigation solution.
  • 14. A method of detecting a biofilm in a wound comprising: obtaining a non-gelled composition including a staining agent which preferentially stains biofilms, 0.1 to 2.0% by weight EDTA, 0.1 to 1.0% by weight of a surfactant, and a preservative in the form of methyl-paraben, wherein the staining agent is Rose Bengal;terminally sterilizing the composition using ethylene oxide;applying the composition to viable tissue;inspecting the tissue for the presence of stained biofilm with the naked eye or with a light source that causes the stained biofilm to fluoresce; anddetecting the fluorescence emitted from the stained biofilm.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the composition is a foaming mousse and includes a foaming agent.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the composition is a soluble film.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the composition is a lyophilized wafer.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein applying the composition to viable tissue comprises (i) contacting the viable tissue with a soluble film including the composition that has a thickness of at least 0.1 centimeter and (ii) leaving the soluble film in place for at least 2 minutes to permit dissolution of the film.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein applying the composition to viable tissue comprises (i) contacting the viable tissue with a lyophilized wafer including the composition that has a thickness of at least 0.1 centimeter and (ii) leaving the lyophilized wafer in place for at least two minutes to permit dissolution of the wafer.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1020236 Nov 2010 GB national
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application is a continuation application of Application No. 13/990,755, filed Feb. 19, 2014 which is a U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/GB2011/001665, filed on Nov. 30, 2011, designating the United States of America and published in the English language, which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and to which application we claim priority under 35 USC § 120.

US Referenced Citations (655)
Number Name Date Kind
2396514 Kreidl et al. Mar 1946 A
2785106 Mendelsohn Mar 1957 A
3061469 Manowitz et al. Oct 1962 A
3092552 Romans Jun 1963 A
4258056 Lentsch Mar 1981 A
4612337 Fox, Jr. et al. Sep 1986 A
4655758 Ring et al. Apr 1987 A
4728323 Matson Mar 1988 A
4829129 Kelley May 1989 A
4889654 Mason et al. Dec 1989 A
4906100 Rice et al. Mar 1990 A
4973848 Kolobanov et al. Nov 1990 A
5064652 Bay Nov 1991 A
5326567 Capelli Jul 1994 A
5340924 Tomita et al. Aug 1994 A
5407656 Roozdar Apr 1995 A
5527534 Myhling Jun 1996 A
5567495 Modak et al. Oct 1996 A
5616347 Alliger et al. Apr 1997 A
5662913 Capelli Sep 1997 A
5670169 Cornell Sep 1997 A
5709870 Yoshimura et al. Jan 1998 A
5731083 Bahia et al. Mar 1998 A
5744151 Capelli Apr 1998 A
5744155 Friedman et al. Apr 1998 A
5762620 Cartmell et al. Jun 1998 A
5820918 Ronan et al. Oct 1998 A
5848995 Walder Dec 1998 A
5860947 Stamler Jan 1999 A
5998488 Shinohara et al. Dec 1999 A
6075177 Bahia et al. Jun 2000 A
6207601 Maurer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6290496 Azar et al. Sep 2001 B1
6413556 Bathurst et al. Jul 2002 B1
6468965 Cutler Oct 2002 B1
6548730 Patel et al. Apr 2003 B1
6555508 Paul et al. Apr 2003 B1
6605751 Gibbins et al. Aug 2003 B1
6669981 Parsons et al. Dec 2003 B2
6750262 Haehnle et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753063 Pung et al. Jun 2004 B1
7033511 Zawada et al. Apr 2006 B2
7267828 Parsons et al. Sep 2007 B2
8637072 Kershaw et al. Jan 2014 B2
9149035 Percival et al. Oct 2015 B2
9545390 Percival et al. Jan 2017 B2
10016537 Menon et al. Jul 2018 B2
10046096 Askem et al. Aug 2018 B2
10076447 Barta et al. Sep 2018 B2
10076587 Locke et al. Sep 2018 B2
10143784 Walton et al. Dec 2018 B2
10426670 von Blucher et al. Oct 2019 B2
10426747 Johnson Oct 2019 B2
10426874 Chien et al. Oct 2019 B2
10426875 Blott et al. Oct 2019 B2
10426938 Locke et al. Oct 2019 B2
10434015 Taylor et al. Oct 2019 B2
10434142 Niazi et al. Oct 2019 B2
10434210 Olson et al. Oct 2019 B2
10434284 Hanson et al. Oct 2019 B2
10449094 Donda et al. Oct 2019 B2
D866756 Allen et al. Nov 2019 S
10463760 Karthikeyan et al. Nov 2019 B2
10463773 Haggstrom et al. Nov 2019 B2
10470933 Riesinger Nov 2019 B2
10470936 Wohlgemuth et al. Nov 2019 B2
10471122 Shi et al. Nov 2019 B2
10471190 Locke et al. Nov 2019 B2
10478345 Barta et al. Nov 2019 B2
10478346 Knutson Nov 2019 B2
10478394 Yu Nov 2019 B2
10485707 Sexton Nov 2019 B2
10485891 Andrews et al. Nov 2019 B2
10485892 Hands et al. Nov 2019 B2
10485906 Freedman et al. Nov 2019 B2
10486135 Yang et al. Nov 2019 B2
10492956 Zamierowski Dec 2019 B2
10493178 Marchant et al. Dec 2019 B2
10493184 Collinson et al. Dec 2019 B2
10493185 Stokes et al. Dec 2019 B2
10500099 Hung et al. Dec 2019 B2
10500103 Croizat et al. Dec 2019 B2
10500104 Sookraj Dec 2019 B2
10500173 Yang et al. Dec 2019 B2
10500235 Wardell Dec 2019 B2
10500300 Dybe et al. Dec 2019 B2
10500301 Laurensou Dec 2019 B2
10500302 Holm et al. Dec 2019 B2
10501487 Andrews et al. Dec 2019 B2
10506928 Locke et al. Dec 2019 B2
10507141 Allen et al. Dec 2019 B2
10507259 Cree et al. Dec 2019 B2
10512707 Whalen, III et al. Dec 2019 B2
10525170 Havenstrite et al. Jan 2020 B2
10532137 Pratt et al. Jan 2020 B2
10532194 Locke et al. Jan 2020 B2
10537657 Phillips et al. Jan 2020 B2
10542936 Goldberg et al. Jan 2020 B2
10543133 Shaw et al. Jan 2020 B2
10543293 Suschek Jan 2020 B2
10548777 Locke et al. Feb 2020 B2
10549008 Yoo Feb 2020 B2
10549016 Bushko et al. Feb 2020 B2
10549017 Hsiao et al. Feb 2020 B2
10555838 Wu et al. Feb 2020 B2
10555839 Hartwell Feb 2020 B2
10556044 Robinson et al. Feb 2020 B2
10561533 Hoggarth et al. Feb 2020 B2
10561536 Holm et al. Feb 2020 B2
10568767 Addison et al. Feb 2020 B2
10568768 Long et al. Feb 2020 B2
10568770 Robinson et al. Feb 2020 B2
10568771 MacDonald et al. Feb 2020 B2
10568773 Tuck et al. Feb 2020 B2
10568983 Gerdes et al. Feb 2020 B2
10575991 Dunn Mar 2020 B2
10575992 Sarangapani et al. Mar 2020 B2
10576037 Harrell Mar 2020 B2
10576189 Locke et al. Mar 2020 B2
10583042 Sarangapani et al. Mar 2020 B2
10583228 Shuler et al. Mar 2020 B2
10589007 Coulthard et al. Mar 2020 B2
10590184 Kuo Mar 2020 B2
10610414 Hartwell et al. Apr 2020 B2
10610415 Griffey et al. Apr 2020 B2
10610623 Robinson et al. Apr 2020 B2
10617569 Bonn Apr 2020 B2
10617608 Shin et al. Apr 2020 B2
10617769 Huang Apr 2020 B2
10617784 Yu et al. Apr 2020 B2
10617786 Kluge et al. Apr 2020 B2
10618266 Wright et al. Apr 2020 B2
10624984 Courage et al. Apr 2020 B2
10625002 Locke et al. Apr 2020 B2
10632019 Vitaris Apr 2020 B2
10632224 Hardy et al. Apr 2020 B2
10639206 Hu et al. May 2020 B2
10639350 Arber et al. May 2020 B2
10639404 Lichtenstein May 2020 B2
10646614 Grinstaff et al. May 2020 B2
10653562 Robinson et al. May 2020 B2
10653782 Ameer et al. May 2020 B2
10653810 Datt et al. May 2020 B2
10653821 Nichols May 2020 B2
10653823 Bharti et al. May 2020 B2
10660799 Wu et al. May 2020 B2
10660851 Millis et al. May 2020 B2
10660992 Canner et al. May 2020 B2
10660994 Askem et al. May 2020 B2
10667955 Allen et al. Jun 2020 B2
10667956 Van Holten et al. Jun 2020 B2
10682257 Lu Jun 2020 B2
10682258 Manwaring et al. Jun 2020 B2
10682259 Hunt et al. Jun 2020 B2
10682318 Twomey et al. Jun 2020 B2
10682386 Ellis-Behnke et al. Jun 2020 B2
10682446 Askem et al. Jun 2020 B2
10687983 Dahlberg et al. Jun 2020 B2
10687985 Lee et al. Jun 2020 B2
10688215 Munro et al. Jun 2020 B2
10688217 Hanson et al. Jun 2020 B2
RE48117 Albert et al. Jul 2020 E
10702419 Locke et al. Jul 2020 B2
10702420 Hammond et al. Jul 2020 B2
10703942 Tunius Jul 2020 B2
10709760 Gronberg et al. Jul 2020 B2
10709807 Kshirsagar Jul 2020 B2
10709883 Spector Jul 2020 B2
10716711 Locke et al. Jul 2020 B2
10716874 Koyama et al. Jul 2020 B2
10729589 Dorian et al. Aug 2020 B2
10729590 Simmons et al. Aug 2020 B2
10729826 Lin Aug 2020 B2
10736787 Hannigan et al. Aug 2020 B2
10736788 Locke et al. Aug 2020 B2
10736985 Odermatt et al. Aug 2020 B2
10737003 Fujisaki Aug 2020 B2
10743900 Ingram et al. Aug 2020 B2
10744040 Kazala, Jr. et al. Aug 2020 B2
10744041 Hartwell Aug 2020 B2
10744225 Lindgren et al. Aug 2020 B2
10744237 Guidi et al. Aug 2020 B2
10744238 Guidi et al. Aug 2020 B2
10744239 Armstrong et al. Aug 2020 B2
10744240 Simmons et al. Aug 2020 B2
10751212 Raza et al. Aug 2020 B2
10751442 Bonnefin et al. Aug 2020 B2
10751452 Topaz Aug 2020 B2
10758423 Pigg et al. Sep 2020 B2
10758424 Blott et al. Sep 2020 B2
10758425 Blott et al. Sep 2020 B2
10758426 Eddy Sep 2020 B2
10758651 Blott et al. Sep 2020 B2
10765561 Lattimore et al. Sep 2020 B2
10765783 Locke et al. Sep 2020 B2
10772767 Bjork et al. Sep 2020 B2
10772999 Svensby Sep 2020 B2
10779993 Bishop et al. Sep 2020 B2
10780114 Udagawa et al. Sep 2020 B2
10780194 Flach et al. Sep 2020 B2
10780201 Lin Sep 2020 B2
10780202 Askem et al. Sep 2020 B2
10780203 Coulthard et al. Sep 2020 B2
10782238 Hicks et al. Sep 2020 B2
10792191 Robinson et al. Oct 2020 B2
10792192 Tout et al. Oct 2020 B2
10792337 Leung et al. Oct 2020 B2
10792404 Hu et al. Oct 2020 B2
10792482 Randolph et al. Oct 2020 B2
10800905 Delli-Santi et al. Oct 2020 B2
10806819 Shuler Oct 2020 B2
20020091074 Wooley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020160941 Kruzel Oct 2002 A1
20020172709 Nielsen et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183808 Biel Dec 2002 A1
20030180345 Hill et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180346 Woods Sep 2003 A1
20040001880 Bowler et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040247652 Sabesan Dec 2004 A1
20050059731 Albrecht et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060019571 Lange et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060051385 Scholz Mar 2006 A1
20060051430 Arata et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060115440 Arata et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155260 Blott et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060172000 Cullen et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060234959 Biel et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060254988 Frampton Nov 2006 A1
20070042024 Gladman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070134136 Polyakov et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070166399 Burton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185426 Ambrosio et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219512 Heaton et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239078 Jaeb Oct 2007 A1
20070255192 Patel et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080112920 Chia et al. May 2008 A1
20080188558 Godal et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080226724 Ji et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090012440 Bray et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090177135 Rogers et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090234307 Vitaris Sep 2009 A1
20090259203 Hu et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090293887 Wilkes et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299303 Seegert Dec 2009 A1
20100015208 Kershaw et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030178 MacMeccan et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100113537 Nonaka May 2010 A1
20100125233 Edward S. et al. May 2010 A1
20100125258 Coulthard et al. May 2010 A1
20100129633 Law May 2010 A1
20100137775 Hu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100185163 Heagle Jul 2010 A1
20100298790 Guidi et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310845 Bond et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015595 Robinson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110028918 Hartwell Feb 2011 A1
20110112457 Holm et al. May 2011 A1
20110117025 Dacosta et al. May 2011 A1
20110178451 Robinson et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110224593 Tunius Sep 2011 A1
20110224630 Simmons et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230849 Coulthard et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110237994 Russ et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110251566 Zimnitsky et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257572 Locke et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257573 Hong et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110275972 Rosenberg Nov 2011 A1
20110319808 Bowler et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120071845 Hu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120130332 Cotton et al. May 2012 A1
20120136325 Allen et al. May 2012 A1
20120202398 Marshall et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120209226 Simmons et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130053795 Coulthard et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130123728 Pratt et al. May 2013 A1
20130226063 Taylor et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140005618 Locke et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140074053 Locke et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140161728 Bowler et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188060 Robinson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140194838 Wibaux et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140200532 Robinson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140236112 Von Wolff et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140256925 Catchmark et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276499 Locke et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296804 Hicks et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140308338 Nierle et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140309574 Cotton Oct 2014 A1
20150018433 Leipzig et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150057624 Simmons et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150071985 Walker et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150079152 Wuollett et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150094674 Pratt et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150104486 Bonnefin et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150112311 Hammond et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119831 Robinson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119834 Locke et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150141941 Allen et al. May 2015 A1
20150148785 Kleiner May 2015 A1
20150174304 Askem et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150245949 Locke et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150246164 Heaton et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150250979 Loske Sep 2015 A1
20150265741 Duncan et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150265743 Hanson et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150320901 Chandrashekhar-Bhat et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160008293 Shi et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160038626 Locke et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160051724 Sahin et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160067107 Cotton Mar 2016 A1
20160100987 Hartwell et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160101207 Parsons et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160106878 Yang et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160106892 Hartwell Apr 2016 A1
20160166422 Karim et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160193244 Ota et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160222548 Agboh Aug 2016 A1
20160271178 Hauser et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160287743 Andrews Oct 2016 A1
20160339158 Collinson et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160374847 Lachenbruch et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170014275 Schneider Jan 2017 A1
20170049111 Patton et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170072669 Sekido et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170079276 Percival et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170128269 Coulthard et al. May 2017 A1
20170189237 Locke et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170189575 Lee et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170209615 Tornero Garcia et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170232161 Fewkes et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170258956 Flach et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170347661 Parsons Dec 2017 A1
20170367895 Holm et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170368239 Askem et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180008742 Hoggarth et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180014974 Hoggarth et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180023217 Patton et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180030321 Tunius Feb 2018 A1
20180042789 Bradford et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180078423 Magin et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180086903 Zhang et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180118809 Mearns Spragg May 2018 A1
20180133066 Ahsani et al. May 2018 A1
20180140467 Hunt May 2018 A1
20180140822 Robinson et al. May 2018 A1
20180200414 Askem et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180221531 Bender et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180236124 Young et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180243463 Chatterjee et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180243464 Hwang et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180244857 Lee et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180272052 Locke et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180296397 Askem et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180303873 Been et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180311419 Locke et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180333522 Pratt et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180344533 Rovaniemi Dec 2018 A1
20180353334 Locke et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180353337 Locke Dec 2018 A1
20180353339 Locke et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180353340 Robinson et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180353344 Locke et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180353662 Locke et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180353663 Locke et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180360667 Droche Dec 2018 A1
20190000677 Munro Jan 2019 A1
20190015258 Gowans et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190015468 Yadav et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190030223 Lin Jan 2019 A1
20190046682 Choi et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190060127 Locke et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190083752 Howell et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190117465 Osborne et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190117466 Kazala, Jr. et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190117861 Locke et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190125590 Rehbein et al. May 2019 A1
20190133830 Bishop et al. May 2019 A1
20190151155 Bonn May 2019 A1
20190151159 Gowans et al. May 2019 A1
20190151495 Helary et al. May 2019 A1
20190184052 Ilan et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190216953 Bowler et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190231600 Locke et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190231602 Locke et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190231943 Robinson et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190274889 Steward et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190282728 Kellar et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190290799 Arshi et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190298249 Bates et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298577 Locke et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298578 Shulman et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298579 Moore et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298580 Hall et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298582 Addison et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298881 Ramjit et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190298882 Nelson Oct 2019 A1
20190298895 Selby et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190307611 Askem et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190307612 Hartwell et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190307934 Allen et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190307935 Simmons et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190314187 Emslander et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190314209 Ha et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190314544 Filho et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190321232 Jardret et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190321509 Chakravarthy et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190321526 Robinson et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190322795 Kubo et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190328580 Emslander et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190336343 Etchells et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190336344 Locke Nov 2019 A1
20190336345 Bannwart Nov 2019 A1
20190336346 Locke et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190336640 Vismara et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190336641 Nisbet Nov 2019 A1
20190336643 Luukko et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190336658 Heaton et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190336739 Locke et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343687 Locke et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343889 Luukko et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343979 Kearney et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343993 Weston Nov 2019 A1
20190343994 Greener Nov 2019 A1
20190344242 Kim et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190350763 Pratt et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190350764 Zochowski et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190350765 Heagle et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190350775 Biasutti et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190350970 Saphier et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190351092 Silver et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190351093 Stein et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190351094 Maher et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190351095 Maher et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190351111 Locke et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190358088 Lavocah et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190358361 McInnes et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190358372 Askem et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190365948 Deegan et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190365962 Lee et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190374408 Robles et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190374673 Hoefinghoff et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190380878 Edwards et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190380881 Albert et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190380882 Taylor et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190380883 MacPhee et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190381222 Locke et al. Dec 2019 A9
20190388577 Chandrashekhar-Bhat et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190388579 MacPhee et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190388589 MacPhee et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200000640 Mondal et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000642 Waite Jan 2020 A1
20200000643 Locke Jan 2020 A1
20200000955 Andrews et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000956 Huang et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000960 Kellar et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200000985 Seddon et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200008981 Wheldrake Jan 2020 A1
20200009289 Torabinejad et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200009400 Ribeiro et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200017650 Young et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200022844 Blott et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200023102 Powell Jan 2020 A1
20200023103 Joshi et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200023104 Eriksson et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200023105 Long et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200023106 Carroll et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200030153 Johannison et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200030480 Choi Jan 2020 A1
20200030499 Menon et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200038023 Dunn Feb 2020 A1
20200038249 Pratt et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038250 Edwards et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038251 Locke et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038252 Spiro Feb 2020 A1
20200038283 Hall et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038470 Datt et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038544 Grover et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038546 Dizio et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200038639 Patel et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200046565 Barta et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200046566 Carey et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200046567 Carroll et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200046568 Sexton Feb 2020 A1
20200046663 Murdock et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200046876 Liu Feb 2020 A1
20200046887 Runquist et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200054491 Hentrich et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200054781 Weiser et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200060879 Edwards et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200061253 Long et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200061254 Joshi et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200061379 Bogie et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200069183 Rice et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069476 Randolph et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069477 Holm et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069478 Jabbarzadeh et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069479 Buan et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069835 Hissink et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069850 Beadle et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069851 Blott et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200069853 Hall et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200078223 Locke et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200078224 Carroll et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200078225 Grillitsch et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200078305 Auvinen et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200078330 Gay Mar 2020 A1
20200078482 Yoon et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200078499 Gadde et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200085625 Bellini et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200085626 Braga et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200085629 Locke et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200085630 Robinson et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200085632 Locke et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200085991 Coomber Mar 2020 A1
20200085992 Locke et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200086014 Locke et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200086017 Jardret et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200086049 Park et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200093646 Locke et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200093756 Sabacinski Mar 2020 A1
20200093953 Kim et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200093954 Leise, III Mar 2020 A1
20200093970 Hunt et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200095421 Kettel Mar 2020 A1
20200100945 Albert et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200101192 Folwarzny Apr 2020 A1
20200107964 Locke et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200107965 Greener Apr 2020 A1
20200107966 Francis Apr 2020 A1
20200107967 Holm et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200108169 Hu et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200113741 Rehbein et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200114039 Wang et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200114040 Waite et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200114049 Wall Apr 2020 A1
20200121509 Locke et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200121510 Hartwell et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200121513 Townsend et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200121521 Daniel et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200121833 Askem et al. Apr 2020 A9
20200129338 Gardiner et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200129341 Coulthard et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200129648 Drury et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200129654 Bouvier et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200129655 Gardiner et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200129675 Robinson et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200138754 Johnson May 2020 A1
20200139002 Dudnyk et al. May 2020 A1
20200139023 Haggstrom et al. May 2020 A1
20200139025 Robinson et al. May 2020 A1
20200141031 Kosan et al. May 2020 A1
20200146894 Long et al. May 2020 A1
20200146896 Rice et al. May 2020 A1
20200146897 Locke et al. May 2020 A1
20200146899 Pratt et al. May 2020 A1
20200155355 Hill et al. May 2020 A1
20200155358 Wheldrake May 2020 A1
20200155359 Carroll et al. May 2020 A1
20200155361 Pigg et al. May 2020 A1
20200155379 Shaw et al. May 2020 A1
20200163802 Hunt et al. May 2020 A1
20200163803 Pigg et al. May 2020 A1
20200164112 Kato et al. May 2020 A1
20200164120 Jaecklein et al. May 2020 A1
20200170841 Waite et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200170842 Locke Jun 2020 A1
20200170843 Collinson et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200171197 Hubbell et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200179300 Urban et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200179558 Munro et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200179673 Wan Jun 2020 A1
20200188179 Bugedo-Albizuri et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200188180 Akbari et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200188182 Sanders et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200188183 Hamerslagh et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200188550 Dagger et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200188564 Dunn Jun 2020 A1
20200190310 Meyer Jun 2020 A1
20200197227 Locke et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200197228 Hartwell Jun 2020 A1
20200197559 Bourdillon et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200197580 Kilpadi et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200206035 Kantor et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200206036 Robinson et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200214637 Brownhill et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200214897 Long et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200214898 Waite et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200214899 Locke et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200215220 Schomburg et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200215226 Kitagawa et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200222469 Cotton Jul 2020 A1
20200229983 Robinson et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200230283 Yang et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200237562 Rice et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200237564 Hammond et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200237816 Lait Jul 2020 A1
20200246190 Luckemeyer et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200246191 Lu et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200246194 Gonzalez et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200246195 Robinson et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200253785 Bernet et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200253786 Harrison et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200253788 Rehbein et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200254139 Phillips et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200261275 Manwaring et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200261276 Lujan Hernandez et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200268560 Harrison et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200268561 Locke et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200269028 Hegg Aug 2020 A1
20200270484 Lipscomb et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200276055 Randolph et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200276058 Locke et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200277450 Silverstein et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200281519 Gowans et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200281529 Grubb et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200281678 Long et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200281775 Kushnir et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200282100 Gil et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200282114 Long et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200282115 Gardner et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289328 Luckemeyer et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289347 Gowans et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289701 Hall et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289712 Jiang et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289723 Gregory et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289726 Locke et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200289727 Locke Sep 2020 A1
20200289806 Locke et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200297541 Hartwell et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200297543 Rodzewicz et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200297544 Moine et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200297892 Silcock Sep 2020 A1
20200297893 Ericson Sep 2020 A1
20200297894 Koyama et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200299865 Bonnefin et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200306089 Delury et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200306091 Lee et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200306094 Kushnir et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200315853 Waite Oct 2020 A1
20200315854 Simmons et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200316271 Lin Oct 2020 A1
20200323692 Locke et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200324015 Kettel et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330283 Locke et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330284 Locke et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330285 Rehbein et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330658 Fujisaki Oct 2020 A1
20200330660 Patel et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337719 Ingram et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337904 Waite Oct 2020 A1
20200337905 Earl et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337906 Long et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337908 Long et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200338228 Kharkar et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200338243 Harrison et al. Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (206)
Number Date Country
2745059 Jun 2010 CA
101076251 Nov 2007 CN
101331263 Dec 2008 CN
105407930 Mar 2016 CN
0616650 Sep 1994 EP
0680344 Nov 1995 EP
1158859 Dec 2001 EP
1318842 Jun 2003 EP
1343510 Sep 2003 EP
1425050 Jun 2004 EP
1557088 Jul 2005 EP
1882482 Jan 2008 EP
1925719 May 2008 EP
1343510 May 2010 EP
2262545 Dec 2010 EP
2996730 Mar 2016 EP
3187204 Jul 2017 EP
3241439 Nov 2017 EP
3643328 Apr 2020 EP
3643330 Apr 2020 EP
3643331 Apr 2020 EP
3669838 Jun 2020 EP
3669843 Jun 2020 EP
3669844 Jun 2020 EP
2604900 Apr 1988 FR
735462 Aug 1955 GB
1105829 Mar 1968 GB
2094802 Sep 1982 GB
2220881 Jan 1990 GB
2579211 Jun 2020 GB
2579368 Jun 2020 GB
S5138427 Mar 1976 JP
H04282311 Oct 1992 JP
H0782121 Mar 1995 JP
H07502081 Mar 1995 JP
H08505790 Jun 1996 JP
2000510539 Aug 2000 JP
2003052725 Feb 2003 JP
2003510475 Mar 2003 JP
2003512095 Apr 2003 JP
2003531828 Oct 2003 JP
2005210997 Aug 2005 JP
2007501683 Feb 2007 JP
2007509034 Apr 2007 JP
2007167266 Jul 2007 JP
2007167266 Jul 2007 JP
2007532606 Nov 2007 JP
2008502735 Jan 2008 JP
2008038293 Feb 2008 JP
2008503557 Feb 2008 JP
2008507327 Mar 2008 JP
2008526997 Jul 2008 JP
2009519312 May 2009 JP
2010508346 Mar 2010 JP
2010155963 Jul 2010 JP
2012512857 Jun 2012 JP
2016040294 Mar 2016 JP
2016519966 Jul 2016 JP
100868574 Nov 2008 KR
2092180 Oct 1997 RU
WO-8401721 May 1984 WO
WO-9218098 Oct 1992 WO
WO-9312275 Jun 1993 WO
WO-9319152 Sep 1993 WO
WO-9402022 Feb 1994 WO
WO-9416746 Aug 1994 WO
WO-9601119 Jan 1996 WO
WO-9702313 Jan 1997 WO
WO-9806260 Feb 1998 WO
WO-9846818 Oct 1998 WO
WO-0054593 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0072874 Dec 2000 WO
WO-0123653 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0124839 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0128338 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0128600 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0137936 May 2001 WO
WO-0162289 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0243743 Jun 2002 WO
WO-02055060 Jul 2002 WO
WO-02078755 Oct 2002 WO
WO-03022317 Mar 2003 WO
WO-03047341 Jun 2003 WO
WO-03068247 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2004028461 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004035718 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004056346 Jul 2004 WO
2004105809 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2004108093 Dec 2004 WO
2005018543 Mar 2005 WO
WO-2005020915 Mar 2005 WO
WO-2005032459 Apr 2005 WO
WO-2005079582 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2005099757 Oct 2005 WO
WO-2005123103 Dec 2005 WO
WO-2006000765 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2006015317 Feb 2006 WO
WO-2006022970 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006029213 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006111624 Oct 2006 WO
WO-2007005720 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2007068938 Jun 2007 WO
WO-2008035734 Mar 2008 WO
WO-2009130608 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2010070292 Jun 2010 WO
2011121394 Oct 2011 WO
2011135284 Nov 2011 WO
2011144888 Nov 2011 WO
WO-2012061225 May 2012 WO
WO-2012072980 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2012136968 Oct 2012 WO
2013015827 Jan 2013 WO
2013126049 Aug 2013 WO
2014014842 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014186590 Nov 2014 WO
2015145117 Oct 2015 WO
2015173546 Nov 2015 WO
2016141450 Sep 2016 WO
2017016974 Feb 2017 WO
2017125250 Jul 2017 WO
2018029231 Feb 2018 WO
2018094061 May 2018 WO
2018162613 Sep 2018 WO
2018163093 Sep 2018 WO
2018189265 Oct 2018 WO
2018226667 Dec 2018 WO
2018227144 Dec 2018 WO
2018231825 Dec 2018 WO
2018236648 Dec 2018 WO
2019002085 Jan 2019 WO
2019012068 Jan 2019 WO
2019012069 Jan 2019 WO
2019022493 Jan 2019 WO
2019027933 Feb 2019 WO
2019038548 Feb 2019 WO
2019038549 Feb 2019 WO
2019040656 Feb 2019 WO
2019050855 Mar 2019 WO
2019058373 Mar 2019 WO
2019073326 Apr 2019 WO
2019083563 May 2019 WO
2019083868 May 2019 WO
2019086911 May 2019 WO
2019091150 May 2019 WO
2019094147 May 2019 WO
2019096828 May 2019 WO
2019113275 Jun 2019 WO
2019113623 Jun 2019 WO
2019191590 Oct 2019 WO
2019193141 Oct 2019 WO
2019193333 Oct 2019 WO
2019199389 Oct 2019 WO
2019199596 Oct 2019 WO
2019199687 Oct 2019 WO
2019199798 Oct 2019 WO
2019199849 Oct 2019 WO
2019200035 Oct 2019 WO
2019215572 Nov 2019 WO
2019219613 Nov 2019 WO
2019234365 Dec 2019 WO
2020005344 Jan 2020 WO
2020005536 Jan 2020 WO
2020005546 Jan 2020 WO
2020005577 Jan 2020 WO
2020007429 Jan 2020 WO
2020011691 Jan 2020 WO
2020014178 Jan 2020 WO
2020014310 Jan 2020 WO
2020018300 Jan 2020 WO
2020605062 Jan 2020 WO
2020026061 Feb 2020 WO
2020026144 Feb 2020 WO
2020033351 Feb 2020 WO
2020035811 Feb 2020 WO
2020043665 Mar 2020 WO
2020044237 Mar 2020 WO
2020046443 Mar 2020 WO
2020047255 Mar 2020 WO
2020049038 Mar 2020 WO
2020055945 Mar 2020 WO
2020056014 Mar 2020 WO
2020056182 Mar 2020 WO
2020065531 Apr 2020 WO
2020070231 Apr 2020 WO
2020074512 Apr 2020 WO
2020078993 Apr 2020 WO
2020079009 Apr 2020 WO
2020079330 Apr 2020 WO
2020081259 Apr 2020 WO
2020081391 Apr 2020 WO
2020092598 May 2020 WO
2020136555 Jul 2020 WO
2020141059 Jul 2020 WO
2020144347 Jul 2020 WO
2020159548 Jul 2020 WO
2020159675 Aug 2020 WO
2020159677 Aug 2020 WO
2020159678 Aug 2020 WO
2020159823 Aug 2020 WO
2020159859 Aug 2020 WO
2020159892 Aug 2020 WO
2020161086 Aug 2020 WO
2020173665 Sep 2020 WO
2020173760 Sep 2020 WO
2020174264 Sep 2020 WO
2020174510 Sep 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (267)
Entry
510(k) Premarket Notification, AQUACEL and AQUACEL Ag, Section 5: 510(k) Summary revised Apr. 21, 2008, 6 pages.
AMR: a major European and Global challenge: fact sheet. Antimicrobial Resistance—European Commission (EC—AMR) Sep. 8, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/health/amr/sites/amr/files/amr_factsheet_en.pdf. Accessed Jul. 2, 2018.
Anwar H, Dasgupta M, Costerton J. Testing the susceptibility of bacteria in biofilms to antibacterial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990; 34: 2043-2046.
Arata, J. Staphylococcus aureus and the skin. Japanese Journal of Chemotherapy, 49(3):147-156, 2001.
Australia Patent Application No. 2014265336 Examiner's First Report dated Mar. 29, 2017.
Australian Patent Application No. 2013366038 Examination Report No. 2 dated Jun. 19, 2018.
Australian Patent Application No. 2017201084 Examination Report No. 1 dated May 18, 2018.
Australian Patent Application No. 2014265336 Second Examination Report dated Mar. 26, 2018.
Banin et al., Chelator-induced dispersal and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells in a biofilm. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(3):2064-2069, 2006.
Bay L, Kragh K, Eickhardt S, et al. Bacterial aggregates establish at the edges of acute epidermal wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2018; 7: 105-13.
Bohn G, Liden B, Schultz G, et al. Ovine-based collagen matrix dressing: Next-generation collagen dressing for wound care. Adv Wound Care. 2016; 5: 1-10.
Bowler et al., Dressing conformability and silver-containing wound dressings. Wounds U.K., 6:14-20 (2010).
Bowler P. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm tolerance: a combined threat in the treatment of chronic infections. J Wound Care. 2018 27: 273-277.
Bowler P, Jones S, Davies B, Coyle E. Infection control properties of some wound dressings. J Wound Care. 1999; 8: 499-502.
Bowler P, Jones S, Towers V, et al. Dressing conformability and silver-containing wound dressings. Wounds UK. 2010; 6: 14-20.
Bowler P, Parsons D. Combatting wound biofilm and recalcitrance with a novel anti-biofilm Hydrofiber® wound dressing. Wound Medicine. 2016; 14: 6-11.
Bryant R, Nix D. Principles for practice development to facilitate outcomes and productivity. In Bryant R and Nix D, eds. Acute and Chronic Wounds: Current Management Concepts. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016: 1-20.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2834871 Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2018.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,745,059 Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2018.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,745,059 Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2017.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,745,059 Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2018.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,745,059 Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,303 Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2017.
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,834,871 Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2018.
Capinera et al., Insectional activity of photoactive dyes to American and migratory grasshoppers (Orthoptera acrididae). J.Econ.Entomol., 92(3):662-666, 2000.
Cavaliere R, Ball J, Turnbull L, Whitchurch C. The biofilm matrix destabilizers, EDTA and DNasel, enhance the susceptibility of nontypeable Hemophilus influenzae biofilms to treatment with ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Microbiology. 2014; 3: 557-67.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/ drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf. Accessed Aug. 1, 2018.
Ceri et al., The Calgary biofilm device: New technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37(6):1771-1776, 1999.
Chan B, Cadarette S, Wodchis W, Wong J, Mittmann N, Kran M. Cost-of-illness studies in chronic ulcers: A systemic review. J Wound Care. 2017; 26: S4-S15.
Chemburu et al., Light-induced biocidal action of conjugated polyelectrolytes supported on colloids Langmuir, 24:11053-11062 (2008).
Chile Patent Application No. 3274-2015 Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2017.
Chile Patent Application No. 3274-2015 second Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2018.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201180066375.2 Reexamination Notice dated Jul. 3, 2017.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201180066375.2 Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2016.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201180066375.2 Reexamination Decision dated Dec. 20, 2017.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201280027537.6 Chinese Third Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2016.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201280027537,6 Decision of Reexamination dated Oct. 27, 2017.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201280027537.6 Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2016.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201280027537.6 Reexamination Notice dated Jun. 8, 2017.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201380073403.2 Third Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2018.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201480028155.4 Decision on Rejection dated Nov. 21, 2018.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201480028155.4 First Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2017.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201480028155.4 Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2018.
Ciofu O, Rojo-Molinero E, Macia M, Oliver A. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS. 2017; 125: 304-19.
Costerton J, Geesey G, Cheng K. How bacteria stick. Sci Am. 1978; 238: 86-95.
Costerton J, Irvin R, Cheng K. The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease. Ann Rev Microbiol. 1981; 35: 299-324.
Costerton J, Stewart P, Greenberg E. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999; 284: 1318-22.
Costerton JW. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Ann Rev Microbiol. 1987; 41: 435-64.
Database Biosis, Biosciences Information Service, Philadelphia, PA, 1992, Kida N., et al., “Effect of PH on Preferential Antibacterial Activity of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid EDTA”, XP002485724, Database Accession No. PREV199294118093.
Database Biosis, Biosciences Information Service, Philadelphia, PA, 2005, Percival, L, etal., “Tetrasodium EDTA as a novel central venous catheter lock solution against biofilm”, XP002485725, Database Accession No. PREV200600021247.
Database CA, Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio, US; Izzat, I.N., et al., “Effect of varying concentrations o EDTA on the antimicrobial properties of cutting fluid preservatives”, 1979, XP002485722, STN-International Database Accession No. 93:62380.
Database CA, Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio, US; Reybrouck, G., et al., “Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetate on the germicidal action of disinfectants against Pseudomonas aeruginosa”, XP002485721, STN-International Database Accession No. 72:11588, 1969.
Database Medline, US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, 1988, Kaur, P., et al., “Effect of certain chelating agents on the antibacterial action of silver nitrate”, XP002485723, Database Accession No. NLM3143759.
Demidova and Hamblin, Photodynamic therapy targeted to pathogens Int. J. Immunopathol Pharmacol., 17(3):245-254, 2004.
Dini V, Salvo P, Janowska A, Di Francesco F, Barbini A, Romanelli M. Correlation between wound temperature obtained with an infrared camera and clinical wound bed score in venous leg ulcers. Wounds. 2015; 27: 274-8.
Dougherty et al., Photodynamic therapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(12): 889-905, 1998.
Doughty D, Sparks B. Wound healing physiology and factors that affect the wound repair process. In Bryant R and Nix D, eds. Acute and Chronic Wounds: Current Management Concepts. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016: 63-81.
Eming S, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6: 57-72. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337.
Etebu E, Arikekpar I. Antibiotics: Classification and mechanisms of action with emphasis on molecular perspective. Int J of Appl Microbiol and Biothech Res. 2016; 4: 90-101. http://www.bluepenjournals.org/ijambr/pdf/2016/October/Etebu_and_Arikekpar.pdf. Accessed Aug. 8, 2018.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Proposals for EU Guidelines on the Prudent Use of Antimicrobials in Humans. Stockholm: ECDC; 2017. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/_layouts/forms/Publication_DispForm.aspx?List=4f55ad51-4aed-4d32-b960-af70113dbb90&ID=1643. Accessed Jul. 2, 2018.
European Patent Application No. 09795521.5 Communication dated Mar. 24, 2017.
European Patent Application No. 09795521.5 Office Action dated May 9, 2018.
European Patent Application No. 12719420.7 Communication dated Jul. 20, 2016.
European Patent Application No. 12719420.7 Examination Report dated Apr. 5, 2017.
European Patent Application No. 12719420.7 Examination Report dated Aug. 7, 2018.
European Patent Application No. 13821122.2 Communication dated Oct. 30, 2017.
European Patent Application No. 14797983.5 Supplementary European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2016.
European Patent Application No. 17163418.1 extended European Search Report dated Sep. 17, 2017.
European Patent Application No. EP 06820530.1 Communication dated Apr. 7, 2016.
European Patent Application No. EP 06820530.1 Communication dated Jan. 30, 2013.
European Patent Application No. EP 06820530.1 Communication dated Mar. 30, 2009.
FDA website on Medical Devices, Premarket Notification (510k), 4 pages, 2013.
Fife C, Carter M, Walker D, Thomson B. Wound care outcomes and associated cost among patients treated in US outpatient wound centers: Data from the US Wound Registry. Wounds. 2012; 24: 10-7.
Finnegan S, Percival S. EDTA: an antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent for use in wound care. Adv Wound Care. 2015; 4: 415-21.
Fleming D, Rumbaugh K. Approaches to dispersing medical biofilms. Microorganisms. 2017; 5: 1-16.
Frykberg R, Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2015; 4: 560-82.
Gardner S, Frantz R, Doebbeling B. The validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection. Wound Repair Regen. 2001; 9: 178-86.
Gardner S, Hillis S, Frantz R. Clinical signs of infection in diabetic foot ulcers with high microbial load. Biol Res Nurs. 2009; 11: 119-28.
Gilbert, et al., The Use of Poloxamer Hydrogels for the Assessment of Biofilm Susceptibility Towards Biocide Treatments, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 85:985-990, 1998.
Gilchrist M, Seaton R. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and antimicrobial stewardship: challenges and checklists. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015; 70: 965-70.
Gottrup F. A specialized wound-healing center concept: importance of a multidisciplinary department structure and surgical treatment facilities in the treatment of chronic wounds. Am J Surg. 2004; 187: S38-S43.
Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Bjarnsholt T, et al. Antimicrobials and non-healing wounds: Evidence, controversies and suggestions—key messages. J Wound Care. 2014; 23: 477-8, 480, 482.
Guest JF, Vowden K. The health economic burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the UK. J Wound Care. 2017; 26: 292-303.
Harding K, Szczepkowski M, Mikosiński J, et al. Safety and performance evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Int Wound J. 2016; 13: 442-8.
Harrison-Balestra et al., A wound isolatedPseudomonas aeruginosagrows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualized by light microscopy. Dermatol. Surgery, 29(6):631-635, 2003.
Hobot et al., Effect of Hydrofiber wound dressings on bacterial ultrastructure. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 57(2):67-75 (2008).
Howell J, Stair T, Howell A, Mundt D, Falcone A, Peters S. The effect of scrubbing and irrigation with normal saline, povidone iodine, and cefazolin on wound bacterial counts in a Guinea pig model. Am J Emerg Med. 1993; 11: 134-38.
Hurlow J, Blanz E, Gaddy J. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques. J Wound Care. 2016; 25(suppl 9): S11-S22.
Indian Patent Application No. 9392/DELNP/2013 First Examination Report dated Feb. 23, 2018.
Indian Patent Application No. 5856/DELNP/2013 First Examination Report dated Jun. 20, 2018.
International Wound Infection Institute (IWII). Wound infection in clinical practice. Wounds International, 2016. http://www. woundinfection-institute.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IWII-Wound-infection-in-clinical-practice.pdf. Accessed Jul. 2, 2018.
James G, Swogger E, Wolcott R, et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2008; 16: 37-44.
Japan Patent Application No. 2016-514095 Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2018.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-112806 Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2018.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-541415 Final Rejection dated Jun. 14, 2016.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-242257 Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2016 (English translation is provided).
Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-242257 Office Action dated May 23, 2017.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-543972 Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2016.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-200279 Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2017.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-200279 Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2017.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-200279 Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2016.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-548762 Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2018.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-548762 Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2017.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-154639 Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2017.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-202835 Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2017.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-202835 Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2018.
Jasovský D, Littmann J, Zorzet A, Cars O. Antimicrobial resistance—a threat to the world's sustainable development. Upsala J Med Sci. 2016; 121: 159-64.
Johani K, Malone M, Jensen S, et al. Microscopy visualisation confirms multi-species biofilms are ubiquitous in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2017; 14: 1160-9.
Jones et al., Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings is influenced by dressing conformability with a wound surface. Wounds, 17:263-270 (2005).
Kapoor et al., Fluorescence and absorption spectra of Rose-Bengal dye in the presence of surfactants. Journal of Luminescence, 22(4):429-439, 1981. (Abstract only).
Kaur and Vadehra, Effect of certain chelating agents on the antibacterial action of silver nitrate. Journal of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Microbiology, and Immunology, 32(3):299-306, 1988. (retrieved from Medline, NLM3143759).
Keast D, Swanson T, Carville K, Fletcher J, Schultz G, Black J. Ten top tips . . . understanding and managing wound biofilm. Wounds International. 2014; 5: 20-3.
Kharkevich, D.A., Pharmacology:Textbook. Geotar-Media, p. 66-71, 2006.
Kim D, Namen W, Moore J, Buchanan M, Hayes V, Myntti, M, Hakaim A. Clinical assessment of a biofilm-disrupting agent for the management of chronic wounds compared with standard of care: a therapeutic approach. Wounds. 2018; 30: 120-30.
Kita et al., pH-Dependent preferential antibacterial activity of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Japanese Journal of Bacteriology, 47(4):6 pages, 1992.
Kite et al., Use of in vivo-generated biofilms from hemodialysis catheters to test the efficacy of a novel antimicrobial catheter lock for biofilm eradication in vitro. J Clin Microbiol., 42.7 (2004): 3073-3076.
Kryukov et al., the role of bacteriological examination in diagnosis of chronic tonsillitis. Becthnk 3:35-38, 2008.
Lazarus G, Cooper D, Knighton D, Percoraro R, Rodeheaver G, Robson M. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Wound Repair Regen. 1994; 2: 165-70.
Lewis K. Persister cells. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2010; 64: 357-72.
Lineaweaver et al., Topical antimicrobial toxicity. Arch Surg., 120(3):267-70 (1985).
Lipsky B, Aragón-Sánchez J, Diggle M, et al. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016; 32: 45-74.
Lipsky B, Dryden M, Gottrup F, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship in wound care: A position paper from the British society for antimicrobial chemotherapy and European wound management association. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 3026-35.
Lipsky B. Medical treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39: S104-S114.
Lipsky B, Peters E, Senneville E, et al. Expert opinion on the management of infections in the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012; 28(suppl 1): 163-78.
Macia M, Roho-Molinero E, Oliver A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20: 981-90.
Malone M, Bjarnsholt T, McBain A, et al. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. J Wound Care. 2017; 26: 20-5.
McDonnell G, Russell A. Antiseptics and disinfectants: Activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999; 12: 147-79.
Meredith K, Burke N, Brownley H, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of enhanced and standard silver wound dressings in an in vitro mature bioburden model. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care. 2018 Poster presentation: Las Vegas.
Metcalf D, Bowler P. Biofilm delays wound healing: A review of the evidence. Burns Trauma. 2013; 1: 5-12.
Metcalf D, Bowler P. Clinical Impact of an enhanced antimicrobial dressing in non-healing wounds previously managed with antibiotics. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care. 2018 Poster presentation: Las Vegas.
Metcalf D, Bowler P, Parsons D. In: Dhanasekaran D, ed. Wound Biofilm and Therapeutic Strategies, Microbial Biofilms—Importance and Applications. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2016. https://www.intechopen.com/books/microbial-biofilms-importance-and-applications/wound-biofilm-and-therapeutic-strategies. Accessed Aug. 8, 2018.
Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P. A next-generation antimicrobial wound dressing: a real-life clinical evaluation in the UK and Ireland. J Wound Care. 2016; 25: 132-8.
Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P. Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm. Int Wound J. 2017; 14: 203-13.
Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/006090 Official Action dated Jun. 7, 2016.
Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2015/015197 Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2018.
Muller et al. pH-dependent formation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid supramolecular aggregates. FEBS Lett 340:17-21 (1994).
Nagai et al., Suppressive effects of EDTA for Pseudomonas aeruginosa products biofiim STN CAPLUS, Jan. 1, 1996, 1 page.XP002122029.
Nagoba B, Suryawanshi N, Wadher B, Selkar S. Acidic environment and wound healing: a review. Wounds. 2015; 27: 5-11.
Newman G, Walker M, Hobot J, Bowler P. Visualisation of bacterial sequestration and bactericidal activity within hydrating Hydrofiber wound dressings. Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 1129-39.
Nickel J, Wright J, Ruseska I, Marrie T, Whitfield C, Costerton J. Antibiotic resistance of pseudomonas aeruginosa colonizing a urinary catheter in vitro. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985; 4: 213-18.
Nix D, Pierce B, Haugen V. Eliminating non-compliance. In Bryant R and Nix D, eds. Acute and Chronic Wounds: Current Management Concepts. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016: 428-40.
Nussbaum S, Carter M, Fife C, et al. An economic evaluation of the impact, cost, and Medicare policy implications of chronic nonhealing wounds. Value Health. 2018; 21: 27-32.
Olsen I. Biofilm-specific antibiotic tolerance and resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015; 34: 877-86.
Ono, N. A Semi-quantitative measurement of glycocalyx and an ATP bioluminescent assay for the analysis of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa biofilm. The Japanese Journal of Urology, 86(9):1440-1449, 1995.
Ovington, The Value of Silver in Wound Management. Podiatry Today, Dec. 1999, 12(7):59-62. (marked as Exhibit 3 at the Deposition of Fiona Adam).
Parikh et al., Antimicrobial silver/sodium carboxymethyl cotton dressings for burn wounds Textile Research Journal, 75(2):134-138 (2005).
Parsons et al., Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber Wound Dressing. BioMed Research International 2016: ID 7616471:1-14 (2016).
PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2012/000329 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 17, 2012.
PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/038224 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2015.
PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/038224 International Search Report dated Sep. 15, 2014.
PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/038224 Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2014.
PCT/GB2006/004691 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 12, 2008.
PCT/GB2006/004691 International Search Report dated Jul. 7, 2008.
PCT/GB2006/004691 Written Opinion dated Jul. 7, 2008.
PCT/GB2009/002912 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 21, 2011.
PCT/GB2009/002912 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 2, 2010.
PCT/GB2011/001665 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 4, 2013.
PCT/GB2011/001665 International Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2012.
PCT/GB2011/001665 Written Opinion dated Mar. 2, 2012.
Pennington JA. , A review of iodine toxicity reports. J Am Diet Assoc., 90(11):1571-81 (1990).
Percival et al., Tetrasodium EDTA as a novel central venous catheter lock solution against biofilm. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 26(6):515-519, 2005.
Percival S, Bowler P. Biofilms and their potential role in wound healing. Wounds. 2004; 16: 234-240.
Petchiappan A, Chatterji D. Antibiotic resistance: Current perspectives. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 7400-7409. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/321019969/download. Accessed Jul. 7, 2018.
Phillips T. Chronic cutaneous ulcers: Etiology and epidemiology. J Invest Dermatol. 1994; 102: 38S-41S.
Poon and Burd, In vitro cytotoxity of silver: implication for clinical wound care. Burns. 30(2):140-7 (2004).
Ramage et al., Inhibition on Candida albicans biofilm formation using divalent cation chelators (EDTA), Mycopathologia, 164:301-306, 2007.
Reybrouck et al., Effect of ethylenediamine tetraacetate on the germicidal action of disinfectants against “Pseudomona.” Acta Clinica Belgica, 24(1):32-41, 1969.
Rhoads D, Wolcott R, Percival S. Biofilms in wounds: management strategies. J Wound Care. 2008; 17: 502-9.
Rodeheaver G, Ratliff C. Wound cleansing, wound irrigation, wound disinfection. In: Krasner D, van Rijswijk L, eds. Chronic Wound Care: The Essentials e-Book. Malvern, PA: HMP; 2018: 47-62. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/whywoundcare/Files/ Chapter+5.pdf. Accessed Jul. 7, 2018.
Romanelli M, Vowden K, Weir D. Exudate management made easy. Wounds International. 2014. http://www.woundsinternational. com/made-easys/view/exudate-management-made-easy-1. Accessed Jul. 11, 2018.
Rondas A, Schols J, Stobberingh E, Price P. Definition of infection in chronic wounds by Dutch nursing home physicians. Int Wound J. 2009; 6: 267-74.
Russian Patent Application No. 2015153446 Office Action and Search Report dated Apr. 23, 2018.
Russian Patent Application No. 2013129866 Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2016.
Russian Patent Application No. 2013129866/10 Protocol of a Meeting with the Examiner dated Jun. 14, 2017.
Russian Patent Application No. 2013149176 Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2018.
Russian Patent Application No. 2013149176 Official Action dated Jun. 2, 2016.
Russian Patent Application No. 2015153446 Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2016 (In Russian).
Said et al., An in vitro test of the efficacy of an anti-biofilm wound dressing.Int J Pharm. 474(1-2):177-181 (2014).
Saudi Arabia Patent Application No. 515370133 2nd Examination Report dated Feb. 6, 2017.
Savage V, Chopra I, ONeill A. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms promote horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57: 1968-70.
Sen C, Gordillo G, Roy S, et al. Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009; 17: 763-71.
Senter, A Textbook of Organic Chemistry, Fifth Ed. 1919, pp. 435-443.
Seth A, Zhong A, Nguyen K, et al. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model. Wound Repair Regen. 2014; 22: 712-9.
Shanmugam V, Couch K, McNish S, Amdur R. Relationship between opioid treatment and rate of healing in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2017; 25: 120-30.
Sharma et al., Toluidine blue-mediated photodynamic effects on Staphylococcal biofilms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 52(1):299-305, 2008.
Smith & Nephew, Inc., OTC Medication Information: Dermal Wound Cleanser, benzethonium chloride spray. Details from the FDA, via OTCLabels.com, 6 pages, retrieved Jul. 15, 2014.
Song T, Duperthuy M, Nyunt-Wai, S.Sub-optimal treatment of bacterial biofilms. Antibiotics. 2016; 5: 1-18.
Spellberg B, Srinivasan A, Chambers H. New societal approaches to empowering antibiotic stewardship. JAMA. 2016; 315: 1229-30.
Stevens D, Bisno A, Chambers H, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 147-59.
Stewart P. Antimicrobial tolerance in biofilms. Microbiol Spectrum. 2015; 3: 1-30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC4507308/pdf/nihms697879.pdf. Accessed Jul. 24, 2018.
Stotts R. Wound Bioburden. In Baranoski, S, Ayello, E. eds. Wound Care Essentials: Practice and Principles. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Klower; 2004: 121-48.
Swisher, R.D., Surfactant effects on humans and other mammals. The Soap and Detergent Association, Scientific and Technical Report, 4:1-8, 11, 16, 17,19, Nov. 1966.
Taiwanese Patent Application No. 103117207 Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2018.
Tallardia. Drug synergism: Its detection and applications. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 298(3):865-872, 2001.
Thomas and McCubbin, An in vitro analysis of the antimicrobial properties of 10 silver-containing dressings. The Journal of Wound Care, Sep. 2003, 12(8):105-108.
Thomas-Hess, C. Checklist for factors affecting wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011; 24: 192.
Torkington-Stokes R, Metcalf D, Bowler P. Management of diabetic foot ulcers: valuation of case studies. Br J Nurs. 2016; 25: S27-S33.
Understanding biofilms. Bacteriality. Published online May 26, 2008. http://bacteriality.com/2008/05/biofilm/. Accessed Jul. 2, 2018.
United Nations. World Population Aging. New York. 2017. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdf. Accessed Jul. 24, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/610,671 Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,316 Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,316 Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,316 Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,316 Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/114,517 Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,755 Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,545 Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2003.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/997,545 Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/734,784 Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/124,472 Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/124,472 Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/124,472 Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/124,472 Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/124,472 Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,755 Advisory Action dated Jan. 2, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,755 Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,755 Office Action dated May 5, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/114,517 Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/114,517 Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/114,517 Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/654,498 Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/654,498 Office Action dated May 3, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/654,498 Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/795,176 Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/889,818 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/889,818 Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/889,818 Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/889,818 Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/889,818 Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14,889,818 Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/372,299 Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,755 Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/372,299 Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2018.
Usacheva et al., Interaction of the photobactericides methylene blue and toluidine blue with a fluorophore in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 40:55-61, 2008.
Varani et al., Human skin in organ culture and human skin cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts) in monolayer culture for assessment of chemically induced skin damage. Toxicol Pathol., 35(5):693-701, 2007.
Vengerovsky, A.I., Pharmaceutical incompatibility. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 3:12 pages, 2003. http.7/old.ssmu.ru/bull/03/3/1684.pdf.
Wainwright. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 42:13-28, 1998.
Wainwright et al., The Use of new methylene blue in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm destruction. Biofouling, 18:247-249, 2002. (Abstract only).
Walker M, Bowler P, Cochrane C. In vitro studies to show sequestration of matrix metalloproteinases by silver-containing wound care products. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007; 53: 18-25.
Walker M, Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P. A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2015; 24: 11-22.
Waring et al. Physico-chemical characterisation of carboxymethylated spun cellulose fibres. Biomaterials 22:903-912 (2001).
Webb R. A chronic case of confusion. J of Wound Care. 2017; 26: 421.
Welsby S. The Spectrum Activity of AQUACEL Ag+ with Strengthening Fibre Ribbon using an In Vitro Corrected Zone of Inhibition Assay. 2015. ConvaTec data on file.
White, “An historical overview of the use of silver in wound management,” Actisorb Silver 220, The Silver Supplement Part Two: Clinical Evidence, 6(Supp. Pt. 2): 6 pages (2001).
Wilkinson H, Stephenson C, Hardman M. Comparing the effectiveness of polymer debriding devices using a porcine wound biofilm model. Adv Wound Care. 2016; 5: 475-85.
Wirtanen, et al., Performance Evaluation of disinfectant Formulations Using Poloxamer-hydrogel Biofilm-constructs, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 85:965-971, 1998.
Wolcott R. Biofilms cause chronic infections. J of Wound Care. 2017; 26: 423-5.
Wolcott R. Disrupting the biofilm matrix improves wound healing outcomes. J Wound Care. 2015; 24: 366-71.
Wolcott R, Rhoads D. A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects with critical limb ischemia. J Wound Care. 2008; 17: 145-55.
Wolcott R, Sanford N, Gabrilska R, Oates J, Wilkinson, J, Rumbaugh K. Microbiota is a primary cause of pathogenesis of chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2016; 25: Sup10: S33-S43.
Wood et al., Erythrosine is a potential photosensitizer for the photodynamic therapy of oral plaque biofilms. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 57:680-684, 2006.
Zölß C, Cech JD. Efficacy of a new multifunctional surfactant-based biomaterial dressing with 1% silver sulphadiazine in chronic wounds. Int Wound J. 2016; 13: 738-43. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12361.
Canadian Office Action, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,303, dated Oct. 30, 2018, 4 pages.
Japanese Search Report, Japan Patent Office, Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-128781, dated May 28, 2019, 12 pages.
Japanese Office Action, Japan Patent Office, Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-128781, dated Nov. 26, 2019, 3 pages.
Canadian Office Action, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Canadian Patent Application No. 2,819,303, dated Nov. 28, 2019, 3 pages.
Japanese Pre-Appeal Examination Report, Japan Patent Office, Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-1128781, dated Aug. 6, 2020, 2 pages.
Notification of Reasons for Refusal, Japan Patent Office, Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-128781, dated Dec. 1, 2020, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190216953 A1 Jul 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13990755 US
Child 16295774 US