Patent Application
20230181724
The present patent application claims the priority of European patent application no 20174523.9 filed on May 13, 20202, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the prevention and/or treatment of marine mollusc's viral infection.
Marine mollusc production is increasingly important to global food supply. Today, global bivalve production represents nearly 15 million tons.
Now, these productions have shown a slow growth essentially because of infectious diseases. As an example, irido-like virus infections led to the almost total extermination of the oyster C. angula in European Atlantic waters in the early 1970's. Since the early 1990's, viruses belonging to the Herpesviridae family have been associated with high mortality rate of C. gigas larvae and spat in Europe, but also in New Zealand, Australia, China, USA and Mexico.
These examples highlight the adverse effect of infectious diseases on marine mollusc production.
The acknowledgement of these infectious diseases as a major driver for marine mollusc production thus fueled interest in the immunity of these animals.
In fact, the understanding of immune mechanisms and response to infections represents a great advantage for the obtaining of disease-resistant cultured bivalves.
Previous studies showed that bivalves possess distinct and specific antiviral and antibacterial responses (GREEN et al., Veterinary research, 47:72, 2016).
In case of a viral infection, the oyster antiviral response is notably triggered by dsRNA recognition. Accordingly, poly (I:C) as been identified as a promising antiviral response elicitor.
In contrast, the bivalve subjected to a bacterial infection displayed a distinct response involving genes associated with a broad range of functions including cellular proliferation, adhesion, migration and immune response (e.g. big defensin).
As evidence of such differences:
The inventors have made a surprising discovery during experiments related to the characterization of poly (I:C) oyster-associated immune response.
Whereas dsDNA (LAFONT et al., abovementioned, 2017) or killed bacteria (i.e. ds bacterial DNA and proteins; GREEN & MONTAGANI, abovementioned, 2013) did not induced any antiviral response, the use of inactivated virus as a negative priming control has resulted surprisingly in the obtaining of an antiviral response, which antiviral response was similar to the poly (I:C) one.
Whereas the mechanism underlying such immunity is not still clear, this discovery enables to envisage the vaccination of marine mollusc against virus infection using compositions comprising inactivated virus.
Accordingly, the present invention concerns a composition comprising at least one non-infectious virus particle for preventing and/or treating a viral infection in a marine mollusc, preferably the virus particle is specific to the viral infection.
In a third object, the present invention concerns a method for preventing and/or treating a viral infection in a marine mollusc comprising the step of administrating to said marine mollusc a composition comprising an effective amount of at least one non-infectious virus particle.
Preferably, the virus particle is specific to the viral infection.
The
The
The
The
As used herein, the term “marine mollusc” refers to bivalve or marine gastropods.
As used herein, the term “bivalve” may denote a clam, an oyster, a cockle, a mussel, or a scallop. As used herein, “bivalve” refers to all bivalve species that are naturally infected by the ostreid herpes virus: Crassostrea gigas; Crassotrea angulata; Crassostrea. ariakensis; Crassostrea rivularis; Crassostrea sikamea; Crassostrea hongkongensis; Saccostrea glomerata; Ostrea edulis; Ostrea angasi; Venerupis philippinarum; V. decussatus; Protothaca staminea; Donax trunculus; Crassadoma gigantea; Chlamys farreri; capharca broughtonii; Pecten maximus; Mytilus edulis; Mytilus galloprovincialis.
Preferably, said marine mollusc is a bivalve and, most preferably, said marine mollusc is an oyster.
The oysters are members of the family Ostreidae. This family includes the edible oysters, which mainly belong to the genera Ostrea, Crassostrea, Ostreola, Magallana, Saccostrea, and Pteriidae (e.g. Pinctada).
Now and in a still preferred embodiment, said oyster belong to the genera Crassostrea, and is preferably Crassostrea gigas.
As used herein, the term “marine gastropods” refers to abalones.
In fact, several species of abalone (molluscan gastropod genus Haliotis) are the hosts for Haliotis herpesvirus (AbHV), including H. discus discus, H. discus hannai, H. diversicolor Reeve, H. diversicolor aquatilis, and H. diversicolor supertexta.
As used herein, the term “marine mollusc” refers to an adult, a spat (or juvenile) or to a larva, preferably to an adult or a spat, and most preferably to a spat. In case of oyster, the larva can be 6 to 40 days, preferably 20 to 40 days; the spat can be 40 to days to a year, preferably 4 to 12 months. In relation with the term “virus”, it refers to a virus that may infect a marine mollusc or accumulate in a marine mollusc. As an example of such viruses, one can cites viruses belonging to a wide range of viral families including Herpesviridae, Papoviridae, Togaviridae, Retroviridae, Reoviridae, Norovirus, Birnaviridae and Picornaviridae (For a review, see. ARZUL et al., Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, vol. 147, p: 118-135, 2017).
Among these virus families, most of information concerns the Herpesviridae family. In fact, herpesviruses are associated to mortality outbreaks resulting in high losses in several marine mollusc species worldwide, including the Pacific oyster C gigas.
Thus, in a preferred embodiment, said virus is a herpesvirus.
A herpesvirus is purified from naturally infected larval Pacific oysters collected in 1995 in a French commercial hatchery (LE DEUFF & RENAULT, J. Gen. Virol., vol. 80, p: 1317-1322, 1999). This virus is classified as ostreid herpesvirus type-1 (Genome Accession number AY509253). As herpesvirus, the OsHV-1 is a double-strand DNA of about 207 kb.
Accordingly, said virus is preferably ostreid herpesvirus type-1 (OsHV-1).
As used herein, a virus particle means a virus particle containing a viral genome. Now, a virus particle also means a virus particle containing a mutated viral genome (e.g., by nucleic acid mutation, substitution or insertion) or a virus particle not containing any viral genome and viral proteins resulting in the production of non-infectious virus particles.
Advantageously, said virus particle is an inactivated virus particle. If not necessary for non-replicative particles, such inactivation is necessary for replicative virus particles.
As used herein “an inactivated virus particle” means a viral particle, which is no more infectious.
Surprisingly, the inventors have established that virus UV inactivated virus induces specific protection.
Methods for inactivation of viral particles or recombinant virus particles are well known from one of skill in the art. Non-limiting examples of viral inactivation include chemical inactivation such as formalin, taurine chloramine, formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, propiolactene, beta-propiolactone (REMUNE) or alditriol-2) treatment, thermal inactivation, physical inactivation such as U.V or gamma irradiation or microwave exposure, and combinations thereof.
Preferably, said inactivated virus particle is a UV inactivated virus particle.
According to a specific embodiment, the composition of the invention may also comprise an adjuvant.
As used herein, the term “adjuvant” refers to a substance used in combination with virus particle that produced more immunity than the virus particle alone.
In another preferred embodiment, the composition of the invention further comprises at least one absorption-promoting agent.
Absorption-promoting agents are well known from one of skill in the art. As examples, one can cites surfactants such as polyoxyethylene derivatives of fatty acid partial esters of sorbitol anhydrides (e.g., Tween® 80, Polyoxyl 40 Stearate, Polyoxyethylene 50 Stearate, polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether and Octoxynol), mixed micelles, enamines, sodium salicylate, glycerol esters of acetoacetic acid (eg., glyceryl-1,3-diacetoacetate or 1,2-isopropylideneglycerine-3-acetoacetate), clyclodextrin or beta-cyclodextrin derivatives (eg., 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl-beta-cyclodextrin)), medium-chain fatty acid such as mono- and diglycerides (eg., sodium caprate-extracts of coconut oil, Capmul), or triglycerides (eg., amylodextrin, Estaram 299, Miglyol 810), polymers such as carboxymethylcellulose, carbopol, polycarbophil, tragacanth or sodium alginate.
The composition may comprise one or more additives (e.g., diluents, excipients, stabilizers, preservatives). See, generally, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 6th Ed. (various editors, 1989-1998, Marcel Dekker); and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems (ANSEL et al., 1994, WILLIAMS & WILKINS).
In another preferred embodiment, the composition of the invention corresponds to sea water comprising inactivated virus particle.
The composition of the invention may be administrated once or several time.
Such administration may correspond to an injection or to a bath treatment. In case of bath treatment, the composition preferably corresponds to sea water comprising an effective amount of inactivated virus particle.
Advantageously, the interval between said consecutive administrations is comprised between 15 days and 3 months, preferably between 1 and 2 months.
According to the present invention, an “effective amount” of a composition is one which is sufficient to achieve a desired biological effect, in this case at least one of antiviral response to virus infection. The ranges of effective doses provided below are not intended to limit the invention and represent preferred dose ranges.
Generally speaking, the dosage for an oyster will be from about 103-108 virus particles per dose with 106-5×107 preferred.
The invention is now illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
Experiments have been performed on specific pathogen free (SPF) (i.e. free of mortality, negative for OsHV-1 detection and very low Vibrio sp. bacteria concentrations) juvenile 10 months old C. gigas oysters.
OsHV-1 inoculums (or virus homogenates) were prepared according to SCHIKORSKI et al. (Virus Res., vol. 155, p: 28-34, 2011) from moribund oysters experimentally infected with OsHV-1 in previous trials and frozen at −80° C. Viral DNA loads (OsHV-1 μvar genomes copies·μL−1) in inoculums were estimated by qPCR. Viral inoculums were confirmed to be free of cultivable bacteria by plating 40 μl on LB NaCl agar plates. Control inoculums (control homogenate) were prepared following the same protocol from healthy naïve oysters showing no detectable amount of viral DNA.
Oysters were injected either with 100 μL of viral inoculum UV-treated or not containing 1,37.107 cp/μL.
For each priming condition, animals were previously anesthetized in hexahydrate MgCl2. A group of ysters were injected using 26-gauge needle attached to a multi-dispensing hand pipette with a Poly(I:C) solution (PIC) in the adductor muscle to spread into the circulatory system. Injection in further groups of oysters of UV inactivated OsHV-1 inoculum as UV inactivated control inoculum (no virus UV), and sterile filtered seawater (FSW) were used as a further control.
24 h and 7 days after priming, each oyster group was exposed to seawater contaminated with OsHV-1 (/virus) or to non-contaminated seawater (/SW).
Each condition was then separated in two subgroups with one for mortality monitoring and one for sampling.
Sampling consisted in individually removing shells of each oyster with a sterile scalpel blade and snap-froze the whole oyster in liquid nitrogen by pool of three animals. The oysters were stored at −80° C. before grinding to powder and nucleic acid purification. Then, viral genomic DNA per ng of oyster was determined as in BATISTA et al. (mentioned. Virol., vol (139), p: 1-11, 2007).
Mortality was followed daily and dead spats were removed from tanks and stored at −80° C. Survival rate data were analyzed for statistical differences between treatments by log rank test on Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
The protocol is summarized in
The
The table 1 summarized the survival rates obtained in two separate experiments.
The results established that, while the population of the negative groups (FSW and no virus UV) decreased following its exposition to contaminated seawater (/virus), the oysters population primed with Poly (I:C) (PIC) was stable 7 days post-infection (p value <0.0001).
Now, and unexpectedly, the results also established that no difference were observed between PIC and inactivated virus condition with the oyster population primed with inactivated OsHV-1 virus (virus UV) being also stable 7 days post-infection. After two months post-infection, the oyster population primed with inactivated OsHV-1 virus (virus UV) was still stable.
Accordingly, UV inactivated virus seems to be an antiviral response elicitor as poly (I:C).
The
Again, the results established that, while the virus replication increase in the negative groups (FSW and no virus UV), said virus replication remains low and stable in the oysters population primed Poly (I:C) (PIC) and with inactivated virus.
Thus, the inventors initiate a protocol of “pseudo-vaccination” of oyster larvae using inactivated viral suspension or inactivated contaminated seawater
For these experiments, 3 ml of viral suspensions are concentrated at 105 to 108 DNA copies viral/mL.
These viral suspensions and 10 ml of contaminated seawater (CSW) bearing 108 DNA copies viral/mL are subjected to UV illumination for inactivating virus.
Oyster 6 days post-fecundation larvae (i.e. 100 μm) are exposed to inactivated viral suspension during 24 hours or are immersed in inactivated contaminated seawater.
Then, said larvae at a concentration of 50 larvae/mL at 20° C. are exposed to a 1/1000 dilution of viral suspension concentrated at 108 viral DNA copies/mL. Then, larvae mortality is monitored during 7 days.
In further experiments, contaminated seawater was used.
For these experiments, oysters were injected with contaminated seawater produced by harvesting seawater from tanks containing oysters infected with OsHV-1 by injection and exposed to UV radiation (CSW-UV); viral load in CSW-UV was ranging from 2.102 to 5.5 104 copies viral DNA/μL; CSW-UV was filtered on a 8 μm mesh before use. As a negative control, oysters were injected with a not contaminated-UV treated SW.
To test the impact of the vaccination, oysters were challenged 48 h after vaccination with:
The experiment was performed 2 times.
A significant difference was observed between survival rates of vaccinated and not vaccinated oysters (p<0.0001).
The vaccination method was efficient in protection the oysters against OsHV-1 (average survival rates of 84%).
Finally, experiments were done on young oyster spats.
For vaccination, 0.5 to 1 cm oyster spats (i.e. 20 to 20 days larvae) were exposed (bath treatment) to contaminated seawater produced by harvesting seawater from tanks containing oysters infected with OsHV-1 by injection and exposed to UV radiation (CSW-UV); viral load in CSW-UV was 4.35.104 copies viral DNA/μL; CSW-UV was filtered on a 8 μm mesh before use; 5 replicate tanks containing 200 spats and 500 mL of CSW-UV were used. As a negative control, oysters were exposed to non-contaminated-UV treated SW. 3 replicate tanks containing 200 spats and 500 mL of SW were used.
Then, oysters were challenged 48 h after vaccination by immersion with CSW (5.2.104 copies viral DNA/μL diluted 10 times) or SW as a negative control.
The results are presented in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20174523.9 | May 2020 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/062895 | 5/14/2021 | WO |
