Composition with sustained antimicrobial activity

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10806144
  • Patent Number
    10,806,144
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 12, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 20, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are compositions comprising benzyl alcohol, one or more cationic antimicrobial agent, and one or more emollient, the combination of which results in persistent antimicrobial activity after application to the skin. The compositions optionally further comprise an organic acid and/or a zinc salt, such as zinc gluconate, as an anti-irritant.
Description
1. INTRODUCTION

Disclosed herein are compositions comprising benzyl alcohol, a cationic antimicrobial agent, and an emollient, the combination of which results in persistent antimicrobial activity when applied to the skin.


2. BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene guidelines for healthcare personnel published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that alcohol-based hand gels and foams be used routinely, with intermittent thorough hand washing with soaps throughout the day. Studies have shown that the rate of compliance by the healthcare workers with the hand washing guidelines is lower than 50% partly because of the possibility/fear of skin irritation with the frequent use of soaps and partly due to lack of time. This problem could be addressed by the development of soaps and other skin-care products that have sufficient residual antibacterial activity on the skin to inactivate newly introduced bacteria.


3. SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are compositions comprising benzyl alcohol, one or more cationic antimicrobial agent, and one or more sesquiterpenoid and/or emollient solvent, the combination of which results in persistent antimicrobial activity after application to the skin. The compositions optionally further comprise an organic acid and/or one or more zinc salt as an anti-irritant.


In certain non-limiting embodiments, the composition comprises a synergistic combination of benzyl alcohol and one or more cationic antimicrobial agent such as a biguanide and/or a quaternary ammonium compound.


In certain non-limiting embodiments, the emollient is farnesol or dipropylene glycol. Without being limited by any theory, it is believed that such emollients enhance penetration of antimicrobial agents into the superficial layer of the skin, thereby prolonging their action.


The compositions disclosed herein may be used as soaps, hand sanitizers, creams, lotions, and splashes and may optionally be comprised in wipes.


Also provided is a method of providing a skin surface with a persistent antimicrobial activity, comprising treating the skin surface with a composition as described herein.







4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For clarity and not by way of limitation the detailed description is divided into the following subsections:


(i) benzyl alcohol;


(ii) antimicrobial agents;


(iii) sesquiterpenoids;


(iv) emollient solvents;


(v) organic acids;


(vi) additional components; and


(vii) compositions/methods of use.


“About” as that term is used herein means ±10% of the recited value.


“Persistent antimicrobial activity” is antimicrobial activity that is retained after the initial exposure to the composition, although not necessarily at the same level. In non-limiting embodiments, use of the composition results in topical antimicrobial activity for at least one hour or at least two hours or at least four hours following exposure to the composition. In specific non-limiting embodiments, the antimicrobial activity remaining after one hour is a log 10 reduction in colony forming units of at least 0.5, or at least 1, or at least 1.5, for example as determined by tests set forth below in section 5. In other specific non-limiting embodiments, the antimicrobial activity remaining after two hours is a log 10 reduction in colony forming units of at least 0.5, or at least 1, or at least 1.5, for example as determined by tests set forth below in section 5.


4.1 Benzyl Alcohol

The compositions disclosed herein comprise benzyl alcohol, at a concentration (percent weight/weight, “% w/w”) between about 0.1 and about 5% w/w, or between about 0.1 and about 3% w/w, or between about 1.0 and about 3% w/w; or between 0.5 and 2% w/w. In specific non-limiting embodiments the benzyl alcohol is plant-derived.


In certain, non-limiting embodiments, the compositions disclosed herein comprise benzyl alcohol, at a concentration (percent weight/weight, “% w/w”) between about 0.05 and about 5% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 4.5% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 4% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 3.5% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 3% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 2.5% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 2% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 1.5% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 1% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.5% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.45% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.4% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.35% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.3% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.25% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.2% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.15% w/w; or between about 0.05 and about 0.1% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.5% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.45% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.4% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.35% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.3% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.25% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.2% w/w; or between about 0.1 and about 0.15% w/w.


4.2 Antimicrobial Agents

The compositions disclosed herein comprise one or more cationic antimicrobial agent. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the cationic antimicrobial agent(s) is (are) selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium antimicrobial compounds, antimicrobial biguanides, and combinations thereof. Quaternary ammonium antimicrobial compound, where present, is at a concentration between about 0.05 and 1% w/w, or between about 0.05 and about 0.5% w/w, or between about 0.1 and about 0.3% w/w, or between 0.1 and 0.23% w/w (if more than one species of quaternary ammonium antimicrobial compound is present, the foregoing are the concentration ranges of the total amount of all species present). Antimicrobial biguanide, where present, is at a concentration between about 0.05 and about 3.0% w/w, or between about 0.05 and 1.5% w/w, or between about 0.05 and about 1.0% w/w, or between about 0.05 and about 0.8% w/w, or between 0.05 and 0.5% w/w, or about 0.4% w/w; if more than one species of biguanide is present, the foregoing are the concentrations/ranges of the total amount of all species present.


Non-limiting examples of quaternary ammonium antimicrobial compounds that may be used include benzalkonium chloride (BZK), benzethonium chloride (BZT), dequalinium chloride, alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride, cetyl pyridinium chloride, methylbenzethonium chloride, cetalkonium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (cetrimide) dofanium chloride, tetraethylammonium bromide, domiphen bromide, and combinations thereof.


Non-limiting examples of biguanides that may be used include chlorhexidine, as a free base or salt, polyhexamethylene biguanide (“PHMB”), alexidine, polyaminopropyl biguanide (e.g., Cosmocil CQ), and combinations thereof. Chlorhexidine salts that may be used include but are not limited to the following: chlorhexidine diphosphanilate, chlorhexidine digluconate, chlorhexidine diacetate, chlorhexidine dihydrochloride, chlorhexidine dichloride, chlorhexidine dihydroiodide, chlorhexidine diperchlorate, chlorhexidine dinitrate, chlorhexidine sulfate, chlorhexidine sulfite, chlorhexidine thiosulfate, chlorhexidine di-acid phosphate, chlorhexidine difluorophosphate, chlorhexidine diformate, chlorhexidine dipropionate, chlorhexidine di-iodobutyrate, chlorhexidine di-n-valerate, chlorhexidine dicaproate, chlorhexidine malonate, chlorhexidine succinate, chlorhexidine malate, chlorhexidine tartrate, chlorhexidine dimonoglycolate, chlorhexidine mono-diglycolate, chlorhexidine dilactate, chlorhexidine di-.alpha.-hydroxyisobutyrate, chlorhexidine diglucoheptonate, chlorhexidine di-isothionate, chlorhexidine dibenzoate, chlorhexidine dicinnamate, chlorhexidine dimandelate, chlorhexidine di-isophthalate, chlorhexidine di-2-hydroxy-napthoate, chlorhexidine embonate, and combinations thereof.


The compositions may further comprise one or more antimicrobial agent that is not a cationic antimicrobial agent. Non-limiting examples of such additional agents include triclosan, parachlorometaxylenol (“PCMX”), chloroeresol, chlorxylenol, benzyl alcohol, bronopol, chlorbutanol, ethanol, phenoxyethanol, phenylethyl alcohol, 2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol, thiomersal, clindamycin, erythromycin, benzoyl peroxide, mupirocin, bacitracin, polymyxin B, neomycin, triclosan, parachlorometaxylene, foscarnet, miconazole, fluconazole, itriconazole, ketoconazole, povidone iodine, combinations thereof and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. For example, but not by way of limitation, phenoxyethanol, where present, may be at a concentration between about 0.1 and about 1% w/w, and triclosan, where present, may be at a concentration between about 0.025 to about 2% w/w, or between 0.15 and 1% w/w.


Another non-limiting example of an antimicrobial which may be used is iodopropynylbutyl carbamate (IPBC; Germall plus), for example at a concentration between 0.05 and 2% w/w.


4.3 Sesquiterpenoids

Compositions disclosed herein may comprise one or more sesquiterpenoid selected from the group consisting of farnesol, nerolidol, bisabolol, apritone and combinations thereof. Where present, the sesquiterpenoid (e.g. farnesol) is at a concentration between about 0.1 and about 4% w/w, or between about 0.1 and about 3% w/w, or between about 0.3 and about 3% w/w, or between about 1 and 3% w/w, or between about 0.1 and 0.3% w/w; or between about 0.5 and about 4% w/w, or between about 0.5 and 3% w/w; or between about 0.5 and 0.3% w/w.


4.4 Emollient Solvents

Compositions disclosed herein may comprise one or more emollient solvent selected from the group consisting of dipropylene glycol, diglycerol, ethyl hexyl glycerin and combinations thereof. Dipropylene glycol or diglycerol, where present, is at a concentration of between about 0.1 and 10% w/w, or between about 1 and about 5% w/w, or between 0.2 and 7% w/w, or between 0.1 and 4% w/w, or between 0.2 and 5% w/w; or ethyl hexyl glycerin where present, is at a concentration between about 0.3 and about 4% w/w, or between about 0.3 and 3% w/w, or between about 0.5 and about 3% w/w, or between 1 and 3% w/w, or between 0.5 and 1.0% w/w.


Additional compounds with emollient properties that may optionally be comprised in the compositions include, for example, butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, a C3-C12 alkanediol, a C5-C10 alkanediol, butanediol, pentanediol, hexanediol, octanediol, Symdiol™, emu oil, grapeseed oil, olive oil, caprylic/capric triglyceride, panthenol, lauric alcohol, propylene glycol, glycerin, isopropyl myristate and combinations thereof. In non-limiting examples, alkanediol may be present at a concentration between about 0.5 and about 2.0% w/w, or between about 0.5 and about 1.0% w/w, or between about 0.2 and about 2% w/w, or between about 0.2 and about 1.0% w/w; octanediol may be at a concentration between about 0.5 and about 2% w/w, or between about 0.5 and about 1.0% w/w; and butylene glycol may be present at a concentration between about 0.5 and about 3% w/w.


4.5 Organic Acids

Organic acids that may be used in the disclosed compositions include lactic acid, citric acid, salicylic acid, glycolic acid, mandelic acid, benzoic acid and combinations thereof. In non-limiting examples, an organic acid may be at a concentration between about 0.1 and about 2% w/w.


4.6 Additional Components

The compositions may contain additional components known in the art for use in soaps, skin sanitizers, and other topical compositions.


In certain non-limiting embodiments, the composition may comprise a polyethylene oxide (Polyox) hydrogel polymer which, without being bound to any particular theory, can help the skin retain moisture.


In certain non-limiting embodiments, the composition may comprise an anti-irritant component, for example a zinc salt, such as zinc gluconate, alpha bisabolol, aloe gel/leaf juice, oat beta glucan, oat flour, oat extract and combinations thereof. Further non-limiting examples of zinc salts that may be used include zinc acetate, zinc butyrate, zinc citrate, zinc glycerate, zinc glycolate, zinc formate, zinc lactate, zinc picolinate, zinc propionate, zinc salicylate, zinc tartrate, zinc undecylenate, zinc oxide, zinc stearate and combinations thereof. For example, a combination of aloe gel/leaf juice and alpha bisabolol may be used where the ratio of bisabolol to aloe gel/leaf juice may be between about 1:1 to 1:10. In non-limiting embodiments, the concentration of zinc salt may be between about 0.1 and about 2.0% w/w, the concentration of bisabolol may be between about 0.01 and about 0.2% w/w, and/or the concentration of Aloe gel/leaf juice may be between about 0.125 and about 2.0%. In non-limiting embodiments, the oat beta glucan, the oat flour or oat extract may be between about 0.5-5.0% w/w.


For example, a composition disclosed herein may further comprise a thickening and/or gelling agent such as polyethylene oxide (Polyox) hydrogel polymer, stearyl alcohol, cellulose polymer, cationic hydroxy ethyl cellulose (e.g., Ucare; JR30), hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl cellulose (Klucel), chitosan pyrrolidone carboxylate (Kytamer), behenyl alcohol, zinc stearate, emulsifying waxes, including but not limited to Incroquat and Polawax, an addition polymer of acrylic acid, a resin such as Carbopol® ETD 2020, guar gum, acacia, acrylates/steareth-20 methacrylate copolymer, agar, algin, alginic acid, ammonium acrylate co-polymers, ammonium alginate, ammonium chloride, ammonium sulfate, amylopectin, attapulgite, bentonite, C9-15 alcohols, calcium acetate, calcium alginate, calcium carrageenan, calcium chloride, caprylic alcohol, carbomer 910, carbomer 934, carbomer 934P, carbomer 940, carbomer 941, carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, carrageenan, cellulose, cellulose gum, cetearyl alcohol, cetyl alcohol, corn starch, damar, dextrin, dibenzlidine sorbitol, ethylene dihydrogenated tallowamide, ethylene diolamide, ethylene distearamide, gelatin, guar gum, guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride, hectorite, hyaluronic acid, hydrated silica, hydroxybutyl methylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl ethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl stearamide-MIPA, isocetyl alcohol, isostearyl alcohol, karaya gum, kelp, lauryl alcohol, locust bean gum, magnesium aluminium silicate, magnesium silicate, magnesium trisilicate, methoxy PEG-22/dodecyl glycol copolymer, methylcellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, montmorillonite, myristyl alcohol, oat flour, oleyl alcohol, palm kernel alcohol, pectin, PEG-2M, PEG-5M, polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, potassium alginate, potassium aluminium polyacrylate, potassium carrageenan, potassium chloride, potassium sulfate, potato starch, propylene glycol alginate, sodium acrylate/vinyl alcohol copolymer, sodium carboxymethyl dextran, sodium carrageenan, sodium cellulose sulfate, sodium chloride, sodium polymethacrylate, sodium silicoaluminate, sodium sulfate, stearalkonium bentotnite, stearalkonium hectorite, stearyl alcohol, tallow alcohol, TEA-hydrochloride, tragacanth gum, tridecyl alcohol, tromethamine magnesium aluminium silicate, wheat flour, wheat starch, xanthan gum, abietyl alcohol, acrylinoleic acid, aluminum behenate, aluminum caprylate, aluminum dilinoleate, aluminum salts, such as distearate, and aluminum isostearates, beeswax, behenamide, butadiene/acrylonitrile copolymer, C29-70 acid, calcium behenate, calcium stearate, candelilla wax, carnauba, ceresin, cholesterol, cholesterol hydroxystearate, coconut alcohol, copal, diglyceryl stearate malate, dihydroabietyl alcohol, dimethyl lauramine oleate, dodecanoic acid/cetearyl alcohol/glycol copolymer, erucamide, ethylcellulose, glyceryl triacetyl hydroxystearate, glyceryl tri-acetyl ricinolate, glycol dibehenate, glycol di-octanoate, glycol distearate, hexanediol distearate, hydrogenated C6-14 olefin polymers, hydrogenated castor oil, hydrogenated cottonseed oil, hydrogenated lard, hydrogenated menhaden oil, hydrogenated palm kernel glycerides, hydrogenated palm kernel oil, hydrogenated palm oil, hydrogenated polyisobutene, hydrogenated soybean oil, hydrogenated tallow amide, hydrogenated tallow glyceride, hydrogenated vegetable glyceride, hydrogenated vegetable oil, Japan wax, jojoba wax, lanolin alcohol, shea butter, lauramide, methyl dehydroabietate, methyl hydrogenated rosinate, methyl rosinate, methylstyrene/vinyltoluene copolymer, microcrystalline wax, montan acid wax, montan wax, myristyleicosanol, myristyloctadecanol, octadecene/maleic anhyrdine copolymer, octyldodecyl stearoyl stearate, oleamide, oleostearine, ouricury wax, oxidized polyethylene, ozokerite, paraffin, pentaerythrityl hydrogenated rosinate, pentaerythrityl tetraoctanoate, pentaerythrityl rosinate, pentaerythrityl tetraabietate, pentaerythrityl tetrabehenate, pentaerythrityl tetraoleate, pentaerythrityl tetrastearate, ophthalmic anhydride/glycerin/glycidyl decanoate copolymer, ophthalmic/trimellitic/glycols copolymer, polybutene, polybutylene terephthalate, polydipentene, polyethylene, polyisobutene, polyisoprene, polyvinyl butyral, polyvinyl laurate, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicocoate, propylene glycol diisononanoate, propylene glycol dilaurate, propylene glycol dipelargonate, propylene glycol distearate, propylene glycol diundecanoate, PVP/eiconsene copolymer, PVP/hexadecene copolymer, rice bran wax, stearlkonium bentonite, stearalkonium hectorite, stearamide, stearamide DEA-distearate, stearamide DIBA-stearate, stearamide MEA-stearate, stearone, stearyl erucamide, stearyl stearate, stearyl stearoyl stearate, synthetic beeswax, synthetic wax, trihydroxystearin, triisononanoin, triisostearin, tri-isostearyl trilinoleate, trilaurin, trilinoleic acid, trilinolein, trimyristin, triolein, tripalmitin, tristearin, zinc laurate, zinc myristate, zinc neodecanoate, zinc rosinate, and mixtures thereof. Gelling agents used in vehicles may be natural gelling agents such as natural gums, starches, pectins, agar and gelatin, and may be based on polysaccharides or proteins Examples include but are not limited to guar gum, xanthum gum, alginic acid (E400), sodium alginate (E401), potassium alginate (E402), ammonium alginate (E403), calcium alginate (E404,—polysaccharides from brown algae), agar (E406, a polysaccharide obtained from red seaweeds), carrageenan (E407, a polysaccharide obtained from red seaweeds), locust bean gum (E410, a natural gum from the seeds of the Carob tree), pectin (E440, a polysaccharide obtained from apple or citrus-fruit), and gelatin (E441, made by partial hydrolysis of animal collagen), pentylene glycol 4-t-nutylcyclohexanol (Symsitive 1609).


A composition as disclosed herein may optionally further comprise a surfactant. The surfactant may be a cationic surfactant, an ampholytic surfactant, or a nonionic surfactant. Non-limiting examples of surfactants include polyethoxylates, fatty alcohols (e.g., ceteth-20 (a cetyl ether of polyethylene oxide having an average of about 20 ethylene oxide units) and other “BRIJ”™ nonionic surfactants available from ICI Americas, Inc. (Wilmington, Del.)), cocamidopropyl betaine, alkyl phenols, fatty acid esters of sorbitol, sorbitan, or polyoxyethylene sorbitan.


A composition as disclosed herein may optionally further comprise an alcohol or a mixture of alcohols, for example, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, n-propyl alcohol, and mixtures thereof; fatty alcohols, including, but not limited to, cetyl alcohol, myristol alcohol, stearyl alcohol, octyl alcohol, decyl alcohol and lauryl alcohol, and mixtures thereof; hexanol, and/or other aliphatic or aromatic alcohol.


A composition as disclosed herein may optionally further comprise a silicone polymer or silicone fluid, for example one or more than one polydimethylsiloxane polymer (Dow Coning 225 Silicone Fluid), dimethiconol fluid in dimethicone (Dow Corning 1403 Silicone Fluid), Silsurf J208 (Siltech LLC, 30019) cyclomethicone and dimethicone copolyl (Dow Corning 3225C Silicone Fluid), Dow Corning 190 and 193 surfactants, polyarylsiloxanes, polyalkylarylsiloxanes, polysiloxane gums, polyether siloxane copolymers, dimethicone polysiloxane, dimethiconol, polysiloxanes, polysiloxane copolymers, polyalkyl aryl silanes, polyaryl siloxanes, polyalkyl siloxanes, polyalkyl aryl silanes, polysiloxane copolymers, alkyl dimethicones, alkylmethicones, alkyldimethicone copoloyls, phenyl silicones, alkyl trimethylsilanes, dimethicone crosspolymer, trisiloxaDC silicone fluid 1404, 1503, silicone glycol (BASF 1066 DCG polyol), GE silicones, dimethicones, cyclomethicones, Bis PEG 15 Methyl ether dimethicone, Dow Corning 2501 cosmetic wax, and combinations thereof.


A composition as disclosed herein may optionally further comprise one or more essential oil and/or individual constituent thereof, one or more additives such as dyes, fragrances, pH adjusters, including basic pH adjusters such as ammonia, mono-, di- and tri-alkyl amines, mono-, di- and tri-alkanolamines, alkali metal and alkaline earth metal hydroxides (e.g., ammonia, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide, monoethanolamine, triethylamine, isopropylamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine); acid pH adjusters such as mineral acids and polycarboxylic acids; vitamins such as vitamin A, vitamin E and vitamin C; polyamino acids and salts, such as ethylenediamine tetraacidic acid (EDTA), preservatives such as Germall plus and DMDM hydantoin, and sunscreens such as aminobenzoic acid, arobenzone, cinoxate, diioxybenzone, homosalate, menthyl anthranilate, octocrylene, octyl methoxycinnamate, octyl salicylate, oxybenzoate, padimate 0, phenylbenzimidazole, sulfonic acid, sulisobenzone, titanium dioxide, trolamine salicylate and zinc oxide.


In certain non-limiting embodiments the composition does not contain a cationic emulsifier selected from the group consisting of include incroquat compounds such as (but not limited to) behenyltrimonium methosulfate in cetearyl alcohol (e.g., incroquat behenyl TMS and incroquat behenyl TMS 50 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.)), behenalkonium chloride and cetyl alcohol (e.g., Incroquat B-65 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.)), behenamido propyl ethyl dimonium ethosulfate and stearyl alcohol (Incroquat BES-35 S (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.)), steralkonium chloride and cetearyl alcohol and PEG-40 Castor oil (e.g., Incroquat CR concentrate (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.)), Incroquat CTC-30 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.), Incroquat DBM-90 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.), Incroquat 0-50 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.), Incroquat S-DQ-25 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.), Incroquat BA-85 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.), Incroquat WG-85 (Croda Inc., Edison, N.J.), as well as distearyldimonium chloride (e.g., VARISOFT® TA 100 (Essen-Degussa, Germany)), palmitamidopropyltrimonium chloride (e.g., VARISOFT® PATC (Essen-Degussa, Germany)), and cetearyl alcohol (and) palmitamidopropyltrimonium chloride (e.g., TEGO® Care CE 40).


4.7 Compositions/Methods of Use

In non-limiting embodiments, the compositions are embodied as soap, cleansing foam, leave-on hand sanitizer, alcohol-containing hand sanitizer or soap, alcohol-free hand sanitizer or soap, lotion, cream, splash, astringent, or wipe formulations. The formulations may be applied to humans or non-human animals (for example, for veterinary or agricultural purposes). Non-limiting examples are described below by way of illustration but further embodiments would be envisaged by the person of skill in the art.


In one set of non-limiting embodiments, the composition is a soap comprising the following components:













Ingredients
(% w/w)







Benzyl alcohol
1.0-3.0


Benzethonium chloride and/or Benzalkonium chloride
 0.1-0.23


Biguanide
0.05-0.6 


Dipropylene Glycol and/or diglycerin
1.0-5.0


Farnesol
0.3-3.0


Organic acid
0.0-2.0










This composition may further contain one or more of the following anti-irritants:


















Zinc gluconate/Zinc lactate
 0.1-0.2



Bisabolol
 0.01-0.2




Aloe leaf juice

0.125-1.0











This composition may have a pH between about 5 and about 6.8.


In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)









Benzyl alcohol
1.0-3.0



Benzethonium chloride/Benzalkonium chloride
 0.1-0.23



Chlorhexidine and/or PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Dipropylene Glycol/diglycerin
1.0-5.0



Farnesol
0.3-3.0



Organic acid
0.0-2.0



Pluronic F-87 prill
0.5-2.0



Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Methocel)
0.1-0.5



Non ionic poly (ethylene Oxide) Polymer (Polyox)
0.1-1.0



Incromine Oxide L
3.0-5.0



Montalene C 40
3.0-8.0



Germall Plus
0.0-2.0



Water
55-70



Glycerin
1.0-3.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
5.0-15 



Butylene glycol
1.0-3.0



Dehydroquat (Cetrimonium chloride)

0-2.0




Phenoxyethanol/Phenylethanol
0.0-1.0



Alkanediol
0.2-2.0



Zinc gluconate/Zinc lactate

0-0.2




Bisabolol

0-0.2





Aloe leaf juice


0-1.0












This composition may have a pH between about 5 and about 6.8.


In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap (“LPS-14E”) having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
% w/w



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Farnesol
1.0



Lactic acid
0.2



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
5.0



Montalene C 40
8.0



Germall Plus
0.2



Water
64.27



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
8.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



PHMB
0.4



Octanediol
1.0



pH 5.2-5.5










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap (“LPS-14F”) having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
% w/w



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Farnesol
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.5



Incromine Oxide L
3.0



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.12



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
15.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0



Dehydroquat
1.0



Bisabolol
0.025




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



pH 5.2-5.5










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap (“LPS-14F7-2”) having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
% w/w



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Farnesol
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.3



Glycerin
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0



pH 5.6-6.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:













Ingredients
(% w/w)







Pluronic F-87 prill
0.5-1.0


Methocel E4 M
0.1-0.5


PolyoxWSR 205
0.1-0.5


Incromine Oxide L
3.0-5.0


Montalene C 40
3.0-8.0


Germall Plus
0.0-2.0


Water
55-70


Zinc gluconate
0.0-0.2


Glycerin
1.0-3.0


SDA-40 B alcohol
5.0-15 


Butylene glycol
1.0-3.0


Benzyl alcohol
1.0-3.0


Fruit acid
0.1-2.0


Benzethonium chloride and/or Benzalkonium chloride
 0.1-0.23


Dipropylene Glycol and/or diglycerin
1.0-5.0


Farnesol
0.3-2.0


Phenoxyethanol and/or Phenylthanol
0.0-1.0


Chlorhexidine and/or PHMB
0.05-0.6 


Alkanediol
0.2-2.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)









Pluronic F-87 prill
0.5-1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.1-0.5



PolyoxWSR 205
0.1-0.5



Incromine Oxide L
3.0-5.0



Montalene C 40
3.0-8.0



Water
50-70



Zinc gluconate
0.1-0.2



Glycerine
1.0-3.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
5.0-15 



Butylene glycol
1.0-3.0



Benzyl alcohol
1.0-3.0



Benzethonium chloride
 0.1-0.23



Dipropylene Glycol
1.0-5.0



Farnesol
0.3-3.0



Phenoxyethanol
0.0-1.0



PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Octanediol
0.2-2.0



Bisabolol
0.01-1.0 




Aloe leaf juice

0.1-2.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap (“LPS 3”) having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Pluronic F-87 prill
1.00



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.3



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Farnesol
2.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



PHMB
0.4



Octanediol
1.0



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Farnesol
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.3



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
59.3



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Farnesol
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
59.3



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Nerolidol
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.3



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Bisabolol
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.3



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a soap having the following formulation:















Ingredients
(% w/w)


















Benzyl alcohol
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23



PHMB
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0



Apritone
2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2



Incromine Oxide L
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0



Water
57.3



Glycerine
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0



Octanediol
1.0









In one set of non-limiting embodiments, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant foam comprising the following components:















Ingredients
% w/w








Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0



Quaternary ammonium compound
 0.1-0.23



PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Dipropylene Glycol
0.2-5.0



Farnesol
0.1-0.5



Fruit acid
 0.-2.0










The composition may optionally further comprise one or more of the following anti-irritants:

















Zinc gluconate
 0.1-0.5



Bisabolol + gingerextract (Symrelief)
0.05-0.2




Aloe Barbedensis juice/gel

0.25-1.0



Siliconefluid/Polymer
0.25-2.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant foam (HSBZT) having the following formulation:













Ingredients
%w/w







Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0


Benzethonium chloride
 0.1-0.23


PHMB
0.05-0.6 


Dipropylene Glycol
0.2-5.0


Farnesol
0.1-0.5


Fruit acid
0.1-2.0


Zinc gluconate
0.1-0.5


Bisabolol + gingerextract (Symrelief)
0.05-0.2 



Aloe Barbedensis juice/gel

0.25-1.0 


Water
60-80


Polyox WSR 205
0.05-0.2 


Pluronic F-87
0.5-1.0


Solubilizer 611674
0.5-2.0


(PEG-40 Hydrogenated castor oil, Trideceth-9, water)



Phenoxy ethanol
0.0-1.0


Octanediol
 0.5-2.0.


Pentanediol
0.5-2.0


Arlasilk Phospholipid PTM
0.0-0.5


Montalene C-40
0.25-1.0 


Silsurf J208
0.25-2.0 


pH to 4.00-4.5









In one set of non-limiting embodiments, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant foam comprising the following components:















Ingredients
% w/w








Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0



Benzalkonium chloride
 0.1-0.23



PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Dipropylene Glycol
0.2-5.0



Farnesol
0.1-0.5



Lactic acid
0.1-2.0










The composition may optionally further comprise one or more of the following anti-irritants:

















Zinc gluconate/Zinc lactate
 0.1-0.2



Bisabolol + gingerextract (Symrelief)
0.05-0.2




Aloe Barbedensis juice/gel

0.25-1.0









In one set of non-limiting embodiments, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant foam comprising the following components:















Ingredients
(% w/w)








Water
60-85



Zinc gluconate
0.1-0.2



Pluronic F-87
0.5-1.0



Bisabolol + gingerextract (Symrelief)
0.05-0.2 




Aloe Barbedensis juice/gel

0.25-1.0 



Benzethonium chloride
 0.1-0.23



PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Phenoxy ethanol
0.0-1.0



Pentanediol
0.5-2.0



Montalene C-40
0.5-3.0



Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0



Farnesol
0.5-2.0



Organic acid
0.2-0.5



Dipropylene Glycol
0.2-2.0



Propylene glycol
0.2-1.0



Glycerin
0.5-2.0



Ultrapure MFB1-1
0.2-2.0



pH to 4.00-4.2









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant foam (“AQ-D14”) comprising the following components:















Ingredients
(% w/w)


















Water
85.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Pluronic F-87
1.0



Bisabolol + gingerextract (Symrelief)
0.05




Aloe Barbedensis juice/gel

0.5



Benzethonium chloride
0.18



PHMB
1.0



Phenoxy ethanol
0.5



Pentanediol
1.0



Montalene C-40
2.0



Benzyl alcohol
1.0



Farnesol
0.3



Organic acid
0.2



Dipropylene Glycol
0.5



Propylene glycol
0.5



Glycerin
1.0



Ultrapure MFB1-1
1.0



pH to 4.00-4.2









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol hand disinfectant foam comprising the following components:















Ingredient
(% w/w)








Water
25-35



SoftcatPolymerSL-100
0.05-0.2 



Zinc gluconate
0.1-0.2



Glycerin
1.0-5.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.12-2.3 



Lactic acid
0.1-0.2



Glucam P-20
0.2-2.0



SDA 40B alcohol
55-65



Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0



Lemongrass oil
0.01-0.03



Dowcorning silicone fluid 190
1.0-4.0




Aloe leaf juice

0.3-1.0



Symrelief
0.03-0.1 



Ultrapure MFB -10
1.0-5.0



PHMB
0.1-0.3



pH 4.5-4.6









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol hand disinfectant foam comprising the following components:















Ingredient
(% w/w)


















Water
28.05



SoftcatPolymerSL-100
0.05



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Glycerin
1.0



Benzathonium chloride
0.18



Lactic acid
0.1



Glucam P-20
1.0



SDA 40B alcohol
60.0



Benzyl alcohol
1.0



Lemongrass oil
0.02



Dowcorning silicone fluid 190
1.0




Aloe leaf juice

0.5



Symrelief
0.05



Ultrapure MFB -10
1.0



PHMB
0.3



pH 4.5-4.6









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant lotion (HSBAC) having the following formulation:















Ingredients
% w/w








Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0



Benzalkonium chloride
 0.1-0.23



PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Dipropylene Glycol
0.2-5.0



Farnesol
0.1-0.5



Lactic acid
0.1-2.0



Zinc gluconate/Zinc lactate
0.1-0.2



Bisabolol + gingerextract (Symrelief)
0.05-0.2 




Aloe Barbedensis juice/gel

0.25-1.0 



Polyox WSR 205
0.05-0.2 



Polowax NF
0.5-2.0



Incroquat TMS
0.5-4.0



Stearyl alcohol
0.5-3.0



Isopropyl myristate
0.5-2.0



Arlacel 165
0.5-1.0



Vit. E acetate
0.2-0.5



Zinc oxide

0-3.0




Zn stearate
0.25-1.0 



Glycerine
1.0-3.0



Water

60-80.0




Polyquaternium 10
 0.1-0.30



Butylene glycol
0.5-3.0



Allantoin
0.2-0.5



Alkanediol
0.2-1.0



Silicone fluid
0.3-1.0



pH to 5.5-6.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant lotion having the following formulation:















Ingredients
(% w/w)








Polowax NF
0.5-2.0



Incroquat TMS
0.5-4.0



Stearyl alcohol
0.5-3.0



Isopropyl myristate
0.5-2.0



Arlacel 165
0.5-1.0



Vit. E acetate
0.02-0.5 



Zn oxide
0.0-2.0



Zn stearate
0.25-0.50



Glycerin
1.0-3.0



Dipropyleneglycol
0.5-2.0



Water

60-85.0




Polyquaternium 10
 0.1-0.30



Polyox WSR 205
0.05-0.2 



Butylene glycol
0.5-3.0



Dipropylene glycol
0.2-5.0



Farnesol
0.5-2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.0-0.2



Lactic acid
0.1-2.0



Benzalkonium Chloride
 0.1-0.23



PHMB
0.05-0.6 



Benzyl alcohol
0.5-2.0



Silicone fluid
0.3-1.0




Aloe leaf Juice

0.01-2.0 



Symrelief
0.01-1.0 



Adjust pH to 5.5-6.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is an alcohol-free hand disinfectant lotion (“Lotion D-10”) having the following formulation:















Ingredients
(% w/w)


















Polowax NF
2.0



Incroquat TMS
4.0



Stearyl alcohol
1.0



Isopropyl myristate
1.0



Arlacel 165
1.0



Vit. E acetate
0.1



Zn oxide
0.25



Zn stearate
0.5



Glycerin
2.0



Dipropyleneglycol
1.0



Water
80.75



Polyquaternium 10
0.15



Polyox WSR 205
0.1



Butylene glycol
1.0



Farnesol
0.3



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Lactic acid
0.2



Benzalkonium Chloride
0.12



PHMB
0.3



Benzyl alcohol
1.0



Silicone fluid
1.0




Aloe leaf Juice

0.5



Symrelief
0.05



Adjust pH to 5.5-6.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a wound-healing cream having the following formulation:














Ingredients
% w/w
Range (% w/w)

















White Petrolatum*
5.0
4-6


Stearyl Alcohol
13
10-15


Isopropyl Myristate
4.0
3-5


Sorbitan Oleate
1.6
1-2


Polyoxyl 40 Stearate(Myrj 52)
4.0
3-5


Dipropyleneglycol
1.0
0.5-3.0


Incroquat Behenyl TMS
1.0
0.5-3.0


Zinc Oxide
0.3
0.2-1.0


Polawax N.F
1.0
0.5-2.0


Zinc stearate
0.3
0.2-1.0


Water
63.85
55-70


Germall+
0.2
0.1-0.3


Ascorbic acid(Vitamin C)
1.0
0.5-2.0



Calendula Oil

0.5
0.3-1.-0


Benzyl alcohol
0.1
0.1-0.5


PHMB
0.15
0.1-0.3


Benzoic acid
0.2
0.2-0.5


Sodium Benzoate
0.2
0.2-0.5


Resveratrol/Echinacea purpuria extract
0.5
0.3-1.0


Zinc lactate/Zinc gluconate
0.2
0.1-0.5



Aloe leaf Barbadensis juice/Aloe gel

0.5
0.25-1.0 


Alpha Bisabolol
0.1
0.05-0.2 


Adjust pH to 5.8-6.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a wound-healing cream having the following formulation:














Ingredients
% w/w
Range (% w/w)

















White Petrolatum*
5.0
4-6


Stearyl Alcohol
13
10-15


Isopropyl Myristate
4.0
3-5


Sorbitan Oleate
1.6
1-2


Polyoxyl 40 Stearate(Myrj 52)
4.0
3-5


Dipropyleneglycol
1.0
0.5-3.0


Incroquat Behenyl TMS
1.0
0.5-3.0


Zinc Oxide
0.3
0.2-1.0


Polawax N.F
1.0
0.5-2.0


Zinc stearate
0.3
0.2-1.0


Water
63.85
55-70


Germall+
0.2
0.1-0.3


Ascorbic acid(Vitamin C)
1.0
0.5-2.0



Calendula Oil

0.5
0.3-1.-0


Benzyl alcohol
0.1
0.1-0.5


PHMB
0.15
0.1-0.3


Benzoic acid
0.2
0.2-0.5


Sodium Benzoate
0.2
0.2-0.5


Rosemary oil
0.1
0.1-0.3


Resveratrol/Echinacea purpuria extract
0.5
0.3-1.0


Pomogranate oil
0.5
0.3-1.0


Zinc lactate/Zinc gluconate
0.2
0.1-0.5



Aloe leaf Barbadensis juice/Aloe gel

0.5
0.25-1.0 


Alpha Bisabolol
0.1
0.05-0.2 


Adjust pH to 5.8-6.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a wound-healing cream having the following formulation:














Ingredients
% w/w
Range (% w/w)

















White Petrolatum*
5.0
4-6


Polyox WSR 205
0.1
0.05-0.3 


Stearyl Alcohol
13
10-15


Isopropyl Myristate
4.0
3-5


Sorbitan Oleate
1.6
1-2


Polyoxyl 40 Stearate(Myrj 52)
4.0
3-5


Dipropyleneglycol
2.0
0.5-3.0


Incroquat Behenyl TMS
1.0
0.5-3.0


Zinc Oxide
0.3
0.2-1.0


Polawax N.F
1.0
0.5-2.0


Zinc stearate
0.3
0.2-1.0


Water
63.85
55-70


Germall+
0.2
0.1-0.3


Ascorbic acid(Vitamin C)
1.0
0.5-2.0


Glucan(Symglucan from Symrise)
5.0
 2-10



Calendula Oil

0.5
0.3-1.-0


PHMB
0.15
0.1-0.3


Benzyl alcohol
0.1
0.1-0.5


Benzoic acid
0.2
0.2-0.5


Sodium Benzoate
0.2
0.2-0.5


Resveratrol/Echinacea purpuria extract
0.2
0.3-1.0


Zinc lactate/Zinc gluconate
0.2
0.1-0.5



Aloe leaf Barbadensis juice/Aloe gel

0.5
0.25-1.0 


Alpha Bisabolol
0.1
0.05-0.2 


Adjust pH to 5.8-6.0









In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a first aid cream having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)









Silver carbonate
0.1-0.3




Calendula Oil

0.3-1.-0



Curcumin
0.1-2.0



Benzyl alcohol
0.1-0.5



Farnesol
0.3-0.5



PHMB
0.1-0.3



Benzoic acid
0.2-0.5



Zinc gluconate
0.1-0.5



Alpha Bisabolol
0.05-0.2 




Aloe leaf juice

0.3-1.0



White Petrolatum
 1.0-10.0



Stearyl Alcohol
 5.0-20.0



Isopropyl Myristate
1.0-6.0



Sorbitan Oleate
0.5-5.0



Polyoxyl 40 Stearate (Myrj 52)
 1.0-10.0



Germal+
0.05-2.0 



Zinc Oxide
0.2-1.0



Zinc stearate
0.2-1.0



Water
55-70



Adjust pH to 5.8-6.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a first aid cream having the following formulation:
















Ingredients
(% w/w)



















Silver carbonate
0.2




Calendula Oil

0.5



Curcumin
0.5



Benzyl alcohol
0.1



Farnesol
0.1



PHMB
0.15



Benzoic acid
0.2



Zinc gluconate
0.2



Alpha Bisabolol
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.5



White Petrolatum
5.0



Stearyl Alcohol
13



Isopropyl Myristate
4.0



Sorbitan Oleate
1.6



Polyoxyl 40 Stearate (Myrj 52)
4.0



Germal+
0.2



Zinc Oxide
0.3



Zinc stearate
0.3



Water
59.95



Adjust pH to 5.8-6.0










In one specific non-limiting embodiment, the composition is a wound-healing cream having the following formulation:
















Ingredient
Range (% w/w)









Stearyl Alcohol
 5.0-20.0



Isopropyl Myristate
 1.0-6.0



Sorbitan Oleate
 0.2-3.0



Polyoxyl 40 Stearate(Myrj 52)
 1.0-6.0



Dipropyleneglycol
 0.1-4.0



Incroquat Behenyl TMS
 0.1-5.0



Zinc Oxide
0.01-2.0



Polawax N.F
 0.1-3.0



Zinc stearate
0.05-2.0



Water
 40.0-90.0



Polyox WSR 205
0.01-1.0



Benzyl alcohol
 0.0-2.0



Germall+
0.05-2.0



Zinc lactate
0.01-1.0



Zinc gluconate
0.01-0.1



Ascorbic acid(Vit. C)
0.01-2.0




Calendula oil

0.01-1.0



Cosmocil
0.05-3.0



Tetrahydrocurcuminoid
0.05-2.0



Rosemary oil
0.05-2.0



Oat beta glucan (Sym glucan)
0.05-2.0



Oat flour/Oat extract
 0.5-5.0



Resveratrol/Echinacea extract
 0.0-2.0



Pomogranate oil
0.02-2.0




Aloe leaf Barbadensis juice/Aloe gel

 0.5-5.0



Alpha Bisabolol
0.01-2.0










5. EXAMPLE 1

Comparison of Persistent Activities of Commercial Soaps with LPS 14E- and LPS 14 7-2 (the Compositions of which are Described Above).


Method of Testing Substantive Activity:


Pigskins (3 cm2 mounted on petri dishes) were washed with non antibacterial soap and rinsed under running tap water. 3 pairs for control (Soap base) and 3 pairs for test were used. 0.15 ml soap was added to each piece of the pair and rubbed for 30 seconds and rinsed each piece with 75 ml water. After 1 or 2 hours, the pieces were contaminated with 10 μl of 105 Cfu/ml bacterial culture. After 15 minutes the pieces were rinsed with 10 ml of drug inactivating fluid (DNF). The fluid was diluted and plated on TSA. After incubation at 37° C., the bacterial counts were enumerated and the 3 soaps were compared

    • 1=“DC” (0.46% T) Commercial soap containing 0.46% triclosan
    • 2=“TPB”, Comercial soap containing 0.15% triclosan, PHMB and Benzathonium chloride without emollients
    • 3=LPS 14E Soap with emollients
    • 4=LPS 14F7-2 Soap with emollients


Log reduction is calculated from Control Growth which is 1×103 to 5×103 cfu (3-3.5 log 10)


The bacteria tested were, S. aureus(ATCC 6538) and E. coli(ATCC 11229). The results of these experiments are shown in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Log10 reduction in colony-forming units, mean ± SD











S. aureus


E. coli
















DC (0.46% T)





1 hour post wash
0.58
0.5



2 hour post wash
0.17
0.4



TPB (0.15% T)



1 hour post wash
0.9
0.7



2 hour post wash
0.7
0.7



LPS 14E



1 hour post wash
1.8
1.6



2 hour post wash
1.74
1.6



LPS 14F7-2



1 hour post wash
2.3
1.8



2 hour post wash
1.9
1.9










Conclusion:


Activity against both S. aureus (gram positive) and E. coli (gram negative) is seen even 2 hour after rinsing the skin with the LPS 14E and soap containing emollients LPS 14 F7-2 soap without lactic acid provides slightly more substantive activity. Both DC and TPB showed lower antimicrobial activity, and the antimicrobial activity of the DC soap deteriorated over the testing interval.


6. EXAMPLE 2

Comparison of Persistent Activities of Commercial Hand Sanitizers with HSBZT and HSBAC (the Compositions of which are Described Above).


A method analogous to that used to test the soaps (above) was used to test persistent antimicrobial activities of hand sanitizers. The test organism was S. aureus and HSP is a commercial alcohol-based hand sanitizer. The results are shown in Table 2.












TABLE 2









Log10 reduction from control counts












Disinfectant
1 hour post application
4 hour Post application















HSBZT
2.851
2.130



HSBAC
3.2
2.9



HSP
0.102
0.050











Conclusion Both aqueous HSBZT and HSBAC show grater activity than the commercial alcohol-based hand sanitizer tested.


7. EXAMPLE 3

Evaluation of Anti Irritant Composition (ZAB) in an Alcohol Based Hand Disinfectant


Alcohol Based Hand Disinfectant (ABHD)
















Ingredients
% w/w



















Alcohol SDA 40 B
70.0



Benzyl alcohol
1.0



Lactic acid
0.2



Octanediol
1.0



Dipropylene glycol
1.0



Farnesol
0.5



Benzathonium chloride
0.18



PHMB
0.3



Polyquaternium -10
0.1



Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose
0.1



Incromine oxide
1.0



Water
23.62



Total
99.0










ABHD with the following ingredients were prepared for testing in volunteers for anti irritant effect. These ingredients were added to the above ABHD and total weight adjusted to 100 gm with water















ABHD Z
ABHD containing 0.2% zincgluconate


ABHDZ1
ABHD containing 0.2% zincgluconate + 0.2% Zinc



lactate


ABHD ZA
ABHD containing 0.2% zinc gluconate + 0.5% Aloe leaf



juice


ABHD ZB
ABHD containing 0.2% zinc gluconate + 0.2% bisabolol


ABHD ZAB
ABHD containing 0.2% zinc gluconate + 0.5% Aloeleaf



Juice + 0.2% bisabolol


ABHD ZAB 1
ABHD containing 0.2% zincgluconate + 0.25% Aloeleaf



Juice + 0.1% bisabolol









Volunteer Test Results:


Volunteer A had severe irritation when ABHD was applied on the hand.


Volunteer B had moderate reaction


These two volunteers were used for the test.


Test Method:


2 ml of the product is applied on the hand and dried the reaction was observed after 10 minutes The hands were washed and dried After 1 hour the second product was applied. Thus each product was applied after 1 hour interval between application.


Grading of Irritation


0=No reaction


1=Mild itching


2=Moderate itching


3=Severe itching/slight redness


The results are shown in Table 3.












TABLE 3









Reaction












Group
Volunteer A
Volunteer B















ABHD
3.0
2.0



ABHD Z
3.0
2.0



ABHDZ1
2.5
1.5



ABHD ZA
1.5
0



ABHD ZB
2.0
0.5



ABHD ZAB
0
0



ABHD ZAB 1
1.0
0










Conclusion: ZAB provides good anti irritant protection. The alcohol based hand disinfectant (ABHD produced ABHD) without anti irritant Zinc salts produced severe itching and some redness (grading #3).


8. EXAMPLE 4

Evaluation of Emollients in Hand Disinfectant Antimicrobial Compositions









TABLE 4







Formulations containing various emollients









% w/w












Ingredients
A
B
C
















Benzyl alcohol
2.0
2.0




Benzethonium chloride
0.23
0.23
0.23



PHMB
0.4
0.4
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0
5.0
5.0



Farnesol
2.0

2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2
0.2
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1
0.1
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25
0.25
0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0
1.0
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2
0.2
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3
0.3
0.3



Incromine Oxide L
3.42
3.42
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0
8.0
8.0



Water
57.3
59.3
59.3



Glycerine
1.0
1.0
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0
14.0
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0
1.0
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0
1.0
1.0



Octanediol
1.0
1.0
1.0











Composition (A) was formulated with both benzyl alcohol and farnesol; composition (B) was formulated with benzyl alcohol without farnesol; and composition (C) was formulated with farnesol without benzyl alcohol.


Method of Testing Substantive Activity


Pigskins (3 cm2 mounted on petri dishes) were washed with non antibacterial soap and rinsed under running tap water. 3 pairs for control (Soap base) and 3 pairs for testing were used. 0.15 ml soap was added to each piece of the pair and rubbed for 30 seconds and each piece was rinsed with 75 ml water. After 1 or 2 hours, the pieces were contaminated with 10 μl of 105 Cfu/ml bacterial culture. After 15 minutes the pieces were rinsed with 10 ml of drug inactivating fluid (DNF). The fluid was diluted and plated on TSA. After incubation at 37° C., the bacterial counts were enumerated and the soap compositions were compared. The results are shown in Table 5.









TABLE 5







Substantive antibacterial activity after one time application


of soap by pig skin method against, E. coli (ATCC 11229)











Log10 reduction in colony-forming



SOAP
units from control growth







A
1.8



B
1.0



C
0.7










Conclusion: From the above results it is concluded that farnesol and benzyl alcohol provide substantive antibacterial efficacy. Dipropylene glycol acts to dissolve farnesol.


The effect of different sesquiterpenoids on substantive antibacterial activity was also examined using the methods described above. The sesquiterpenoids nerolidol, bisabolol and apritone were examined using the formulations described below in Table 6.












TABLE 6









% w/w














Ingredients
A
B
C
D

















Benzyl alcohol
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0



Benzethonium chloride
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23



PHMB
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4



Dipropylene Glycol
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0



Farnesol
2.0






Nerolidol

2.0





Bisabolol


2.0




Apritone



2.0



Zinc gluconate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2



Bisabolol
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1




Aloe leaf juice

0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25



Pluronic F-87 prill
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0



Methocel E4 M
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2



PolyoxWSR 205
0.3
0.3
0.3




Incromine Oxide L
3.42
3.42
3.42
3.42



Montalene C 40
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0



Water
57.3
57.3
57.3
57.3



Glycerine
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0



SDA-40 B alcohol
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0



Butylene glycol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0



Phenoxyethanol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0



Octanediol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0











The antibacterial effects of the compositions described in Table 6 were tested using the pigskin assay method described above. The results are shown below in Table 7.









TABLE 7







Substantive antibacterial activity with various


sesquiterpenoids against E. coli (ATCC 11229)











Log10 reduction in colony-forming



SOAP
units, mean ± SD







A




1 hour post wash
1.8



B



1 hour post wash
1.5



C



1 hour post wash
1.6



D



1 hour post wash
1.7











Conclusion: All the sesquiterpenoids tested have similar substantive antibacterial efficacy.


9. EXAMPLE 5

Evaluation of Substantive Activity and Test Results of an Antibacterial Soap Formulation (LPS 3, Described Above)


Method of Testing Substantive Activity


Pigskins (3 cm2 mounted on petri dishes) were washed with non antibacterial soap and rinsed under running tap water. 3 pairs for control (Soap base) and 3 pairs for testing were used. 0.15 ml soap was added to each piece of the pair and rubbed for 30 seconds and each piece was rinsed with 75 ml water. After 1 or 2 Hour, the pieces were contaminated with 10 μl of 105 Cfu/ml bacterial culture. After 15 minutes the pieces were rinsed with 10 ml of drug inactivating fluid (DNF). The fluid was diluted and plated on TSA. After incubation at 37° C., the bacterial counts were enumerated and the effect of the three soaps were compared.


The following formulations were tested:


1 DC (0.46% T): Commercial soap containing 0.46% triclosan (T) (Dial).


2 TPB (0.15% T): Soap containing 0.15% triclosan (T), PHMB and benzethonium chloride without emollients.


3 LPS 3 Soap with emollients.


The results are described in Table 8.









TABLE 8







Antibacterial activity after a single one time application of soap


against S. aureus (ATCC 6538) and E. coli (ATCC 11229)









Log10 reduction in colony-forming units, mean ± SD



Pigskin Method









SOAP

S. aureus


E. coli






DC (0.46% T)




1 hour post wash
0.58 ± 0.208
0.5 ± 0.12


2 hour post wash
0.17 ± 0.051
0.4 ± 0.10


TPB (0.15% T)


1 hour post wash
0.9 ± 0.21
0.7 ± 0.11


2 hour post wash
0.7 ± 0.18
0.7 ± 0.20


LPS -3


1 hour post wash
2.3 ± 0.26
1.8 ± 0.21


2 hour post wash
1.94 ± 0.27 
1.9 ± 0.10










Control growth ranged from 1×103 to 5×103 cfu


Conclusion: Activity against both S. aureus (Gram positive) and E. coli (Gram negative) bacteria was seen even 2 hours after rinsing skin that had been treated with the LPS 3 soap containing emollients. The TPB soap, which contains antibacterial agents but no emollients, did not exhibit any substantive antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. Dial soap, which contains a higher concentration of triclosan, also showed no significant substantive antibacterial activity in this assay against S. aureus and E. coli.

The antibacterial efficacy of alcohol-free hand sanitizer formulations was also examined using the methods described above.









TABLE 9







Comparison of the substantive antibacterial efficacy of alcohol-free


hand sanitizers by pigskin method-C (Test organism S. aureus)










Log10 reduction from control counts












Disinfectant
1 hour post application
2 hour Post application















AQ-D14
2.851
2.130



Lotion D-10
3.2
2.9



HSP
0.102
0.050







HSP: alcohol based hand sanitizer Purell







Conclusion: Both of the AQ-D14 and Lotion D-10 alcohol-free hand sanitizers show greater activity than the commercial alcohol-based hand sanitizer tested.


Various patent and non-patent references are cited herein, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: applying to a skin surface a topical antimicrobial composition comprising: (a) about 0.1-3.0% w/w benzyl alcohol;(b) about 0.05-1.0% w/w chlorhexidine salt;(c) about 0.3-3.0% w/w farnesol;(d) about 1.0-5.0% w/w emollient solvents selected from the group consisting of glycerin, ethylhexylglycerin and Phenoxyethanol;(e) about 0.1-1.0% w/w Hydroxypropyl Methyl cellulose;(f) about 0.1-1.0% w/w organic acid selected from the group consisting of citric acid, lactic acid, benzoic acid and combinations thereof; and(g) about 15-70% alcohol,
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises 0.1-0.4% w/w zinc gluconate.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises aloe gel, bisabolol or combinations thereof.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the composition further comprises aloe gel, bisabolol or combinations thereof.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a soap, a hand sanitizer, a cream, a lotion, a splash, an astringent and a wipe.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a soap, a hand sanitizer, a cream, a lotion, a splash, an astringent and a wipe.
  • 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a soap, a hand sanitizer, a cream, a lotion, a splash, an astringent and a wipe.
  • 8. The method of claim 4, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a soap, a hand sanitizer, a cream, a lotion, a splash, an astringent and a wipe.
  • 9. A method comprising: applying to a skin surface a topical antimicrobial composition consisting of: (a) about 0.1-3.0% w/w benzyl alcohol;(b) about 0.05-1.0% w/w chlorhexidine salt;(c) about 0.3-3.0% w/w farnesol;(d) about 1.0-5.0% w/w emollient solvents selected from the group consisting of glycerin, ethylhexylglycerin and Phenoxyethanol;(e) about 0.1-1.0% w/w Hydroxypropyl Methyl cellulose;(f) about 0.1-1.0% w/w organic acid selected from the group consisting of citric acid, lactic acid, benzoic acid and combinations thereof; and(g) about 15-70% alcohol,
PRIORITY CLAIM

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/267,403, filed May 1, 2014 which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/US12/063013, filed Nov. 1, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/555,367, filed Nov. 3, 2011, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/583,505, filed Jan. 5, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/668,160, filed Jul. 5, 2012, to each of which priority is claimed and all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (172)
Number Name Date Kind
3918952 Neumiller Nov 1975 A
4022605 Konya et al. May 1977 A
4049802 Fox, Jr. Sep 1977 A
4330531 Alliger May 1982 A
4404197 Fox, Jr. et al. Sep 1983 A
4563485 Fox, Jr. et al. Jan 1986 A
4579731 Fox, Jr. et al. Apr 1986 A
4581028 Fox, Jr. et al. Apr 1986 A
4612337 Fox, Jr. et al. Sep 1986 A
4723950 Lee Feb 1988 A
4859359 DeMatteo et al. Aug 1989 A
4867898 Spaulding et al. Sep 1989 A
4956354 Gutierrez Sep 1990 A
4975217 Brown-Skrobot et al. Dec 1990 A
5019096 Fox, Jr. et al. May 1991 A
5033488 Curtis et al. Jul 1991 A
5073366 Beck Dec 1991 A
5091442 Milner Feb 1992 A
5100652 Kross et al. Mar 1992 A
5135747 Faryniarz et al. Aug 1992 A
5180605 Milner Jan 1993 A
5200194 Edgren et al. Apr 1993 A
5209251 Curtis et al. May 1993 A
5261421 Milner Nov 1993 A
5310546 Douglas May 1994 A
5334588 Fox, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5567495 Modak et al. Oct 1996 A
5614538 Nelson, Jr. Mar 1997 A
5616338 Fox, Jr. et al. Apr 1997 A
5772640 Modak et al. Jun 1998 A
5854266 Nelson, Jr. Dec 1998 A
5866527 Mertens Feb 1999 A
5891422 Pan et al. Apr 1999 A
5968539 Beerse et al. Oct 1999 A
5985819 Lu et al. Nov 1999 A
5985918 Modak et al. Nov 1999 A
6075056 Quigley, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6083208 Modak et al. Jul 2000 A
6106505 Modak et al. Aug 2000 A
6120758 Siddiqui et al. Sep 2000 A
6258368 Beerse et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270811 Fregonese Aug 2001 B1
6280758 Warren et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287583 Warren et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312675 Deane Nov 2001 B1
6319958 Johnson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323166 Kamiya Nov 2001 B1
6348501 Holt et al. Feb 2002 B1
6397224 Zubeldia et al. May 2002 B1
6420326 Maile et al. Jul 2002 B1
6451748 Taylor et al. Sep 2002 B1
6537955 Raso et al. Mar 2003 B1
6582719 Modak et al. Jun 2003 B2
6616922 Taylor et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630163 Murad Oct 2003 B1
6632784 Massaux et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635676 Baker, Jr. et al. Oct 2003 B2
6696399 Chernin et al. Feb 2004 B1
6699825 Rees et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716883 Casper et al. Apr 2004 B1
6753305 Raso et al. Jun 2004 B2
6858317 Aamodt et al. Feb 2005 B2
6921745 Yamada et al. Jul 2005 B2
6951833 O'Neil Oct 2005 B2
6969522 Bessette et al. Nov 2005 B2
7247295 Schmaus et al. Jul 2007 B2
7435429 Modak et al. Oct 2008 B2
7563461 Modak et al. Jul 2009 B2
7563462 Modak et al. Jul 2009 B2
7572469 Santo et al. Aug 2009 B2
7745425 Modak et al. Jun 2010 B2
7829029 Zumeris et al. Nov 2010 B2
7871649 Modak et al. Jan 2011 B2
7985773 Greten et al. Jul 2011 B2
8568815 Parkkinen Oct 2013 B2
8932624 Modak et al. Jan 2015 B2
8932650 Kross Jan 2015 B2
8951552 Shalaby et al. Feb 2015 B2
9511040 Modak Dec 2016 B2
20010010016 Modak et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010024661 Modak et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020064546 Harris May 2002 A1
20020122876 Modak et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020165130 Johnson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173775 Modak et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020192256 Wu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030113388 Phan Jun 2003 A1
20030044451 McGhee Sep 2003 A1
20030165546 Resch et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030168077 Brown et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180233 Anderson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030195263 Schmaus et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030213168 Hesse et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040092482 Gupta May 2004 A1
20040102429 Modak et al. May 2004 A1
20040132667 Lintner Jul 2004 A1
20040192551 Bessette et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040247685 Modak et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253275 Eini et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050019431 Modak et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050026802 Kilkenny et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050048139 Modak et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063939 Ameer et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050187124 Li et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050222276 Schmaus et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238602 Modak et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060018867 Kawasaki et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060051384 Scholz et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060099237 Modak et al. May 2006 A1
20060198800 Dilallo et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060216246 Belanger et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060233901 Jamieson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060293201 Simon et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293214 Cheng et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070003538 Madhyastha Jan 2007 A1
20070014823 Iwata et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020342 Modak et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027119 Ahmed et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070190094 Bessette et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070275070 Ahmed et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070286813 Toutounghi Dec 2007 A1
20080008729 Swaine et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080038219 Mosbaugh et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080063607 Tamarkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080166314 Jochim et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080226568 Rozsa et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234173 Warr et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080253976 Scott et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080260708 Hall Oct 2008 A1
20080299220 Tamarkin et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080311231 Modak et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080317737 Patel et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080318784 Koo et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090004122 Modak et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028751 Robbins Jan 2009 A1
20090029961 Modak et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090221989 Najafi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090035228 Modak et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090068255 Yu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088358 Roso et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090165812 Resnick et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175806 Modak et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090191288 Squires et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090300864 Adkins et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100034871 Mikkelsen et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100093595 Holzhauer et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100140368 De Lame et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100172847 Modak et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100172848 Modak et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100183524 Zielinski et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100196494 VanBeek Aug 2010 A1
20100216889 Modak et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100234460 Foret et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248962 Wilczynski et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100317743 Macinga et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100323043 Perla et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110028563 Found Feb 2011 A1
20110070376 Wales et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110142899 Lagaron Abello et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120100231 Perla et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120129950 Macinga et al. May 2012 A1
20120171156 Basketter et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120201902 Modak et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120203211 Weadock et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120207862 Morre et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130230609 Modak et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140079819 Debaun et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140178447 Modak et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140242198 Modak et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140243417 Modak et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140287072 Modak et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140322147 Modak et al. Oct 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (81)
Number Date Country
654327 Feb 1986 CH
202004018623 Apr 2005 DE
202008002718 Jul 2009 DE
0054205 Jun 1982 EP
0106266 Apr 1984 EP
0231080 Aug 1987 EP
1108419 Jun 2001 EP
1146112 Oct 2001 EP
1206933 May 2002 EP
1288285 Mar 2003 EP
2775847 Sep 2014 EP
2771632 Jun 1999 FR
2874928 Mar 2010 FR
1060447 Mar 1967 GB
1997-323910 Dec 1997 JP
2002-193717 Jul 2002 JP
2002-370958 Dec 2002 JP
2004-217615 Aug 2004 JP
04250331 Sep 2004 JP
2004-277554 Oct 2004 JP
2004-322078 Nov 2004 JP
2006-225289 Aug 2006 JP
2007-291049 Nov 2007 JP
2010-83806 Apr 2010 JP
2010-184987 Aug 2010 JP
10-2004-077206 Sep 2004 KR
513676 May 1976 SU
8404456 Nov 1984 WO
8501208 Mar 1985 WO
8906962 Aug 1989 WO
9204029 Mar 1992 WO
9302717 Feb 1993 WO
9851273 Nov 1998 WO
9922718 May 1999 WO
2000015288 Mar 2000 WO
0065011 Nov 2000 WO
0172262 Oct 2001 WO
0191555 Dec 2001 WO
0222060 Mar 2002 WO
2002051464 Jul 2002 WO
03000303 Jan 2003 WO
03018498 Mar 2003 WO
03018743 Mar 2003 WO
03077856 Sep 2003 WO
03078367 Sep 2003 WO
2004004631 Jan 2004 WO
2004014416 Feb 2004 WO
2006010269 Feb 2006 WO
2006023349 Mar 2006 WO
2006099359 Sep 2006 WO
2008135085 Apr 2007 WO
2007069214 Jun 2007 WO
2007070795 Jun 2007 WO
2007071089 Jun 2007 WO
2007077573 Jul 2007 WO
2007095041 Aug 2007 WO
2007101848 Sep 2007 WO
2007123790 Nov 2007 WO
2007126651 Nov 2007 WO
2008031087 Mar 2008 WO
2008031601 Mar 2008 WO
2008042197 Apr 2008 WO
2008061187 May 2008 WO
2008119841 Oct 2008 WO
2008135085 Nov 2008 WO
2008154395 Dec 2008 WO
2008157847 Dec 2008 WO
2009062746 Mar 2009 WO
2009049208 Apr 2009 WO
2010091415 Aug 2010 WO
2010119369 Oct 2010 WO
2011002929 Jan 2011 WO
2011151835 Dec 2011 WO
2012017349 Feb 2012 WO
2012051204 Apr 2012 WO
2012109187 Aug 2012 WO
2013066403 May 2013 WO
2013103556 Jul 2013 WO
2014165854 Jan 2014 WO
2014092999 Jun 2014 WO
2014165046 Oct 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (133)
Entry
MMWR, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5116.pdf (Year: 2002).
Block, S.S., “Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation; Fourth Edition,” 1991, pp. Cover, 280-281 and 892, Publisher: Lea & Febiger.
Daily Med, “Antiseptic Skin Cleanser—chlorhexidine gluconate liquid, Drug Label Information,” https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=5577ecbb-cf2c-45e1-a0fb-17df . . . , updated on Sep. 2012, retrieved on Jun. 24, 2016, pp. 1-2.
EPO: Extended Search Report, European Patent Application No. 12845196.0, dated Sep. 5, 2016, pp. 1-8.
EPO: Supplementary Partial Search Report, European Patent Application No. 12845196.0, dated May 17, 2016, pp. 1-6.
EPO: Supplementary Search Report, European Patent Application No. 12846062.3, dated Jan. 8, 2016, pp. 1-14.
EPO: Supplementary Search Report, European Patent Application No. 14763192.3, dated Jan. 5, 2017, pp. 1-7.
Jabra-Rizk, M.A., et al., “Effects of Farnesol on Staphlyococcus aureus Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Suspectibility,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2006, pp. 1463-1469, Publisher: American Society for Microbiology.
Watts, J. L., et al., “Evaluation of Test Dips with Excised Teats,” Journal of Dairy Science 1984, pp. 2062-2065, vol. 67, Issue 9.
Anand, P., et al., “Biological activities of curcumin and its analogues (Congeners) made by man and Mother Nature,” Biochemical Pharmacology 2008, pp. 1590-1611, vol. 76, No. 11, DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.08.008, Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
Ayliffe, G.A.J., et al., “Hand disinfection: A comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies,” Journal of Hospital Infection 1988, pp. 226-243, vol. 11.
Bagamboula, C.F, et al., “Inhibitory effect of thyme and basil essential oils, carvacrol, thymol, estragol, linalool and p-cymene towards Shigella sonnei and S. flexneri,” Food Microbiology 2004, pp. 33-42, vol. 21.
Baiju, N., et al., “Development of a novel surface disinfectant composition containing essential oils and fruit acid against nosocomial pathogens commonly associated with environmental surfaces,” International Journal of Essential Oil Therapeutics 200, pp. 9-14, vol. 2.
Baratta, M.T., et al., “Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of some commercial essential oils,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal 1998, pp. 235-244, vol. 13.
Bettini, M., “Purification of Orange Peel Oil and Oil Phase by Vacuum Distillation,” Functional Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals, Processing Technologies 2006, pp. 157-172, Editor: John Shi, Publisher: CRC Press.
Bezic, N., et al., “Composition and antimicrobial activity of Achillea clavennae L. essential oil.” Phytother. Res. 2003, pp. 1037-1040, vol. 17.
Bio Source Naturals, “Lemongrass Essential Oil: (Cymbopogon citratus),” http://www.biosourcenaturals.com/lemongrass-essential-oil.htm, retrieved on Apr. 5, 2015, pp. 1-2.
Bion, “Acne—Acne Treatment Products,” http://www.bion-research.com/acne_treatment_products.htm, downloaded on Mar. 3, 2008, pp. 1-3.
Bion, “Moderate to Severe Acne,” downloaded on Mar. 3, 2008, http://www.bion-research.com/moderate-to- severe acne.htm, pp. 1-5.
Biosecur Lab, “Biosecur Product Line Receives Self-Affirmed Gras Status for Use as an antioxidant and Nutrient Supplement”, News Release dated Mar. 8, 2011, pp. 1-2.
Brehm-Stecher, B.F. and Jonson, E.A., “Sensitization of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli to antibiotics by the sesquiterpenoids nerolidol, famesol, bisabolol, and apritone,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2003, pp. 3357-3360, vol. 47, No. 10.
Cancio, L.C., “Burn wound infections,” Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented 2001, pp. 1-20, Editors: Holzheimer, R.G. and Mannick, J.A.
Chalchat, J.C. et al, “Chemical Composition of Essential Oil of Calendula officinalis L. (Pot Marigold),” Flavour and Fragrance Journal 1991, pp. 189-192, vol. 6.
Chang, S., et al., “Resources and bioactive substances from Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides),” J. Wood Sci 2003, pp. 1-4, vol. 49, Publisher: The Japan Wood Research Society.
Chemical Book, “8015-73-4(Basil oil) Product Description,” http://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_US_CB3405198.aspx, retrieved on Jul. 1, 2015, pp. 1-2.
Choudhary, V.R., et al., “Solvent-free selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol and benzaldehyde by tert-butyl hydroperoxide using Mn04-exchanged Mg—Al-hydrotalcite catalsysts,” Catalysis Letters 2003, pp. 229-233, vol. 86, No. 4.
Collins, D.A., “A review of alternatives to organophosphorus compounds for the control of storage mites,” Journal of Stored Products Research 2006, pp. 395-426, vol. 42, Publisher: Elsevier Ltd.
Cowan., M. M., “Plant product as antimicrobial agents”, Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999, pp. 564-582, vol. 12, No. 4, Publisher: American Society for Microbiology.
Daily Med, “Antiseptic Skin Cleanser—chlorhexidine gluconate liquid, Drug Label Information,” https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=5577ecbb-cf2c-45e1-a0fb-17df . . . , updated on 09/12, retrieved on Jun. 24, 2016, pp. 1-2.
De Abreu Gonzaga, W., et al., “Composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oils from Zanthoxylum rhoifolium,” Planta Med. 2003, pp. 773-775, vol. 69.
El-Zemity, S.R. and Ahmed, S.M., et al., “Antifungal activity of some essential oils and their major chemical constituents against some phytopathogenic fungi,” Journal of Pest Control and Enviromental Science 2005, pp. 61-72, vol. 13, No. 1.
EPO: Extended Search Report, European Patent Application No. 08780771.5, dated Jan. 2, 2013, pp. 1-6.
EPO: Office Action, European Patent Application No. 10794733.5, dated Dec. 2, 2014, pp. 1-9.
EPO: Supplementary Partial European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 12846062.3, dated Aug. 12, 2015, pp. 1-8.
Esoteric Oil, “Orange essential oil (sweet information),” http/www.essentialoils.co.za/essential-oils/orange.htm, retrieved on Jul. 15, 2012, p. 1.
Esoteric Oils, “Lemongrass essential oil information,” http/www.essentialoils.co.za/essential-oils/lemongrass.htm, downloaded on Jul. 15, 2012, p. 1.
Fang, C., et al., “Prospective clinical study of Hydron, a synthetic dressing, in delivery of an antimicrobial drug to second-degree burns,” J Burn Care Rehabil. 1987, pp. 206-209, vol. 8, No. 3.
Fox, C.L., et al., “Comparative evaluation of zinc sulfadiazine and silver sulfadiazine in burn wound infection,” J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990, pp. 112-117, vol. 11, No. 2.
Gaonkar, T.A., et al., “An alcohol hand rub containing a synergistic combination of an emollient and preservatives: prolonged activity against transient pathogens”, Journal of Hospital Injection 2005, pp. 12-18, vol. 59.
Gaonkar, T.A., et al., “In vivo efficacy of an alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectant containing a synergistic combination of ethylhexylglycerin and preservatives,” Journal of Hospital Injection 2006, pp. 412-417, vol. 63.
Garcia, C.C., et al., “Virucidal activity of essential oils from aromatic plants of San Luis, Argentina,” Phytother. Res. 2003, pp. 1073-1075, vol. 19, No. 9.
Gemeda, N., “Effect of essential oils on aspergillus spore germination, growth and mycotoxin production: a potential source of botanical food preservative”, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2014, pp. S373-S381, vol. 4 (Suppl).
Gershon, H. And Shanks, L., “Antifungal Properties of n-Alkanols, a, w-n-Alkanedoils, and w-Chloro-a-alkanols”, J Pharm. Sci. 1980, pp. 381-384, vol. 64, No. 4.
Goren, A.C., et al., “Analysis of essential oil of Coridothymus capitatus (L.) and its antibacterial and antifungal activity,” Z. Naturforsch. 2003, pp. 687-690, vol. 58, No. 9-10.
Gupta, V.K., “Third Party Observation,” filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,119, filed Aug. 7, 2010, pp. 1-35.
Gupta, V.K., “Third Party Observation,” filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,141, filed Jul. 19, 2010, pp. 1-26.
Hajhashemi, V., et al., “Anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of the leaf extracts and essential oil of Lavandula angustifolia Mill.” J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, pp. 67-71, vol. 89.
Hazan, R., et al., “Benzoic Acid, a Weak Organic Acid Food Preservative, Exerts Specific Effects on Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae” Appl. Environ. Microbial. 2004, pp. 4449-4457, vol. 70, No. 8.
IP Australia: Patent Examination Report No. 1, Australian Patent Application No. 2012332495, dated Jun. 10, 2016, pp. 1-3.
ISA/US: International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/63013, dated Jan. 4, 2013; pp. 1-8.
ISA/US: International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/052793, dated Nov. 19, 2012, pp. 1-14.
ISA/US: International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/29486, dated Oct. 10, 2014, pp. 1-14.
ISA/US: International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US15/62454, dated Feb. 9, 2016, pp. 1-12.
ISA/US: International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/037135, dated Oct. 16, 2012, pp. 1-13.
ISA/US: International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/071731, dated Feb. 12, 2014, pp. 1-11.
JPO: Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-539926, dated Jan. 19, 2016, 17 pages.
Judzentiene, A., et al., “Characterisitcs of essential oil composition in the needles of young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands growing along an aerial ammonia gradient,” CHEMIJA 2006, pp. 67-73, vol. 17, No. 4.
Keeven, J., et al., “Evaluating the preservative effectiveness of RGP lens care solutions,” CLAO J. 1995, pp. 238-241, vol. 21, No. 4.
Klaric, M.S., et al., “Antifungal activity of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) essential oil and thymol against moulds from damp dwellings,” Letters in Applied Microbiology 2007, pp. 36-42, vol. 44, No. 1.
Komthong, P., et al., “Ascending bubble extraction of terpenes from freshly squeezed orange juice”, Food Research International 2006, pp. 53-58, vol. 39.
Kumar, A., et al., “Assessment of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil as a safe botanical preservative against post harvest fungal infestation of food commodities”, Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 2008, pp. 575-580, vol. 9, No. 4.
Kupferwasser, L.I., et al., “Acetylsalicylic Acid Reduces Vegetation Bacterial Density, Hematogenous Bacterial Dissemination, and Frequency of Embolic Events in Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis Through Antiplatelet and Antibacterial Effects,” Circulation 1999, pp. 2791-2797, vol. 99, Publisher: American Heart Association, Inc.
Kupferwasser, L.I., et al., “Salicylic Acid Attenuates Virulence in Endovascular Infections by Targeting Global Regulatory Pathways in Staphylococcus aureus,” J. Clin. Invest. 2003, pp. 222-233, vol. 112.
Kurita, N. and Koike, S., “Synergistic Antimicrobial Effect of Ethanol, Sodium Chloride, Acetic Acid and Essential Oil Components,” Agricultural Biology Chemistry 1983, pp. 67-75, vol. 47, No. 1.
mercola.com, “Lemoncirass Oil: Lighten Up Your Mood with This All-Around Oil,” http://articles.mercola.com/herbal-oils/lemongrass-oil.aspx, printed on Mar. 26, 2015, pp. 1-4.
Minami, M., et al., “The inhibitory effect of essential oils on herpes simplex virus type-1 replication in vitro,” Microbial Immunol. 2003, pp. 681-684, vol. 47, No. 9.
Mintel Global New Products Database 2008, “Antibacterial Wet Wipes,” retrieved from the Internet: URL:www.gnQd.com, retrieved on Sep. 24, 2013, pp. 1-2.
Mintel Global New Products Database 2010, “Sheer Moisturizer Hand Sanitizer”, retrieved from the Internet: URL:www.gn.Qd.com on Aug. 24, 2013, pp. 1-4.
Morganics, “Skin Care,” Morganics, retrieved on Jul. 1, 2015, www.morganics.com/store/page8.html, p. 1.
Nannapaneri, R., et al., “Antimicrobial activity of commercial citrus-based natural extracts against Escherichia coli 0157:H7 isolates and mutant strains”, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2008, pp. 695-699, vol. 5, No. 5, Publisher: May Ann Liebert, Inc.
Nazer, A.I., et al., “Combinations of food antimicrobials at low levels to inhibit the growth of Salmonella sv. Typhimurium: a synergistic effect?,” Food Microbiology 2005, pp. 391-398, vol. 22.
Nerio, L.S., et al., “Repellant activity of essential oils: A review”, Biosource Technology 2010, pp. 372-378, vol. 101.
Panchatcharam, M., et al., “Curcumin improves wound healing by modulating collagen and decreasing reactive oxygen species,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 2006, pp. 87-96, vol. 290, Publisher: Springer.
Paranagama, P.A., et al., “Fungicidal and anti-aflatoxigenic effects of the essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf. (lemongrass) against Aspergillus flavus Link. isolated from stored rice,” Lett. Appl. Microbial. 2003, pp. 86-90, vol. 37.
Pommier, P., et al., “Phase III Randomized Trial of Calendula Officinalis Compared With Trolamine for the Prevention of Acute Dermatitis During Irradiation for Breast Cancer,” J Clin Oncol 2004, pp. 1447-1453, vol. 22, No. 8.
Prabuseenivasan, S., et al., “In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oils”, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2006, pp. 1-8, vol. 6, No. 39.
Reagor, L, et al., “The Effectiveness of Processed Grapefruit-Seed Extract as an Antibacterial Agent: I. An In Vitro Agar Assay,” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2002, pp. 325-332, vol. 8, No. 3.
Schuhmacher, S., et al., “Virucidal effect of peppermint oil on the enveloped viruses herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 in vitro,” Phytomedicine 2003, pp. 504-510, vol. 10.
Sharma, A., “Third Party Observation,” filed in Canadian Patent Application No. 2769627, Jun. 25, 2014, pp. 1-39.
Shin, S., “Anti-Aspergillus activities of plant essential oils and their combination effects with ketoconazole or amphotericin B”, Arch. Pharm. Res. 2003, pp. 389-393, vol. 26, No. 5.
Silva, J., “Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of essential oils of Eucalyptus,” J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, pp. 277-283, vol. 89.
Song, Q., et al., “Volatiles from Ficus hispida and their attractiveness to fig wasps”, Journal of Chemical Ecology 2001, pp. 1929-1942, vol. 27, No. 10.
Subba, M.S., et al., “Antimicrobial Action of Citrus Oils,” J. Food Sci. 1967, pp. 225-227, vol. 32, No. 2.
Table of Acids with Ka and pKa Values, Chem 1A, B, C Lab Manual and Zumdahl 6th Edition, Appendix 5, http://clas.sa.ucsb.edu/staff/Resource%20folder/Chem109ABC/Acid,%20Base%20Strength/Table%20of%20Acids%20w%20Ka s%20and%20pKas.pdf, copy downloaded on Sep. 28, 2015.
Tayyem, R.F., et al., “Curcumin Content of Turmeric and Curry Powders”, Nutrition and Cancer 2006, pp. 126-131, vol. 55, No. 2, Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
The Lubrizol Corporation, “Tecophilic TPU—LifeScience Polymers,” https://web.archive.org/web/20140923074123/http:1/www.1ubrizol.com/LifeScience/Prod ucts/Tecophilic.html; Sep. 23, 2014 [downloaded from internet on Jan. 12, 2016], pp. 1-2.
The Merck Index, “02322. Citral,” 2011, pp. 1-2, 14th Edition, Publisher: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Valero, M. and Salmeron, M.C., “Antibacterial activity of 11 essential oils against Bacillus cereus in tyndallized carrot broth,” Int. J. Food Microbial. 2003, pp. 73-81, vol. 85.
Velluti, A., et al., “Inhibitory effect of cinnamon, clove, lemongrass, oregano and palmarose essential oils on growth and fumonisin B1 production by Fusarium proliferatum in maize grain,” Int. J. Food Microbial. 2003, pp. 145-154, vol. 89.
Wilson, N.D., et al., “The quantification of citral in lemongrass and lemon oils by near-infrared spectroscopy”, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2002, pp. 1257-1263, vol. 54, Publisher: The Authors.
Zeus Quimica, S.A, “Zemea Propanediol—From Corn to Cosmetics . . . Formulate with Nature,” downloaded on Jun. 24, 2015, p. 1.
Zhang, Z., et al., “Antifungal Activities of Major Tea Leaf Volatile Constituents toward Colletorichum Camelliae Massea,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2006, pp. 3936-3940, vol. 54.
Abu Bakr Mohammad, Bin Zakariyya Al-Razi; Kitaab-al-Haawi-fil-Tibb, vol. ii (9th century AD), Dayerah-Al-Ma'aarof Is,amoa. Juderabad. 1976 AD p. 434.
Cakrapanidattah; Cakradattah—Translated by Indradeva Tripathi; Chaukhamba Sanskrit Samsthan (Varanasi), Ed. 4th 2002, p. 260.
Khazaain-ai-Advia vol. JII (20th century Ad), Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan, Nadecm Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1926 AD p. 1050.
Khazaain-al-Advia vol. II (20th century Ad), Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan, Nadeem Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1911 AD p. 342-343.
Khazaain-al-Advia vol. II (20th century AD), Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan, Nadeem Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1911 AD p. 657.
Khazaain-al-Advia, vol. I (20th century AD) Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan; Nadeem Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1911 AD p. 669.
Kitaab-al-Haawi-fil-Tibb, vol. IX (9th century AD), Abu Bakr Mohammad Bin Zakariyya Al-Razi; Dayerah-al-Ma'aarif Usmania, Hyberabad, (First Edition) 1960 AD p. 194.
Kitaab-al-Umdah-fil-Jeraahat, Part I (13th century AD), Aminuddaulah Abul Farj Ibn Al-Quff Maseehi; Dayerah-al-Ma'aarif Usmania, Hyberabad, 1937 AD p. 234-235.
Mohammad Azam Khan; Muheet Azam vol. II (Part II) (19th century AD), Matba Nizami, Kanpur, 1898 AD p. 3.
Mohammad Azam Khan; Muheet-e-Azam vol. I (19th century AD), Matba Nizami, Kanpur, 1896 AD p. 257.
Mohammad Azam Khan; Muheet-e-Azam vol. III (19th century AD), Matba Nizami, Kanpur, 1887 AD p. 261.
Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan; Qaraabaadeen Najm-al-Ghani (20th century AD), Munshi Nawal Kishore, Lucknow, (Second Edition) 1928 AD p. 566.
Mohammad Shareef Khan; Ilaaj-al-Amraaz (18th centruy AD), Afzal-al-Matabe, Barqi Press, Delhi, 1921 AD p. 357.
Mohammad Azam Khan; Muheet-e-Azam vol. III (19th century Ad), Matba Nizami Kanpur, 1887 AD p. 69.
Mohammad Azam Khan; Muheet-e-Azam, vol. I (191 century Ad), Matba Nizami, n Kanpur, 1896 AD p. 197.
Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan; K.hazaain-al-Advia, vol. III (20th century AD), Nadeem Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1926 AD p. 568.
Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan; Khazaain-al-Advia, vol. II (20th century AD), Nadeem Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1911 AD p. 656.
Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan; Khazaain-al-Advia, vol. II (20th century Ad), Nadeem Yunus Printer/Sheikh Mohd Basheer & Sons, Lahore, 1911 AD p. 657.
Mohammad Shareef Khan; Ilaaj-al-Amraaz (18th centruy AD), Afzal-al-Matabe, Barqi Press, Delhi, 1921 AD p. 335.
Qaraabaadeen Najm-al-Ghani (20th century AD), Mohammad Najmul Ghani Khan, Munshi Nawal Kishore, Lucknow, (Second Edition) 1928 AD p. 492.
Samgadharacarya; Saringadhara Samhita—Translated by Smt. Shailaja Srivastava: Chaukhamba Orientalia, Varansai, Edn. 2nd, 1998. [Time of origin 13th century] pp. 431-432.
Siddhayogasamgrahah—Compiled by Yadavji Trikamji Acharya, Sri Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan, Allahabad, Edn. 1st 1978 pp. 131-132.
Sodhalanighantauh—(Namasamgraha Va Gunasamgraha) Sodhala; Edited by P.V. Sharma, Oriental Institute, Broda, Edn 1st 1978 p. 116.
Susruta; Susruta Samhita—Edited & translated by P.V. Sharma, vol. III: Chaukhamba Visvabharati, Varanasi, Edn. 1st, 2001. [Time of origin 1000 BC 5th century] p. 10.
Vagabhata; Astanga Hrdaya—(commentary by Arunadutta) edited by Bhisagacarya Harisastri Paradakara Vaidya; Chaukhamba Orientalia, Varanasi, edn. 8th, 1998 [Time of origin 5th century] p. 890.
Ziya Al-Din Abdullah Ibn Al-Baitar; al-Jaam'e-li-Mufradaat-al-Advia-wal Aghzia, vol. II (13th century AD), Matba Amra, Cairo, Egypt, 1874 AD p. 84.
Ziya Al-Din Abdullah Ibn A1 Baitar; Al-Jaam'e-li-Mufradaat-al-Advia-wal Aghzia, vol. IV (13th century AD), Matba Amra, Cario, Egypt, 1874 AD p. 57.
Adesina et al., “Prevention of Bacterial Biofilms Formation on Urinary Catheter by Selected Plant Extracts,” Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 2015, pp. 67-73, vol. 18(2).
Drekonja et al., “Antimicrobial Urinary Catheters: a systematic review,” Expert Rev. Med. Devices, 2008, pp. 495-506, vol. 5(4).
Gaonkar, T.A., et al., “Efficacy of a Silicone Urinary Catheter Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Triclosan against Colonization with Proteus mirabilis and Other Uropathogens,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2007, pp. 596-598, vol. 28.
Gaonkar, T.A., et al.,“Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Urinary Catheters Impregnated with Antiseptics in an In Vitro Urinary Tract Model,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2003, pp. 506-513, vol. 24(7).
Islas et al., “Singly and Binary Grafted Poly(vinyl chloride) Urinary Catheters that Elute Ciprofloxacin and Prevent Bacteria Adhesion,” Int. J. Pharm, 2015, pp. 20-28, vol. 488.
Leuck et al., “Safety and efficacy of a novel silver-impregnated urinary catheter system for preventing catheter-associated bacteriuria: a pilot randomized clinical trial,” Am J Infect Control, 2015, pp. 260-265, vol. 3.
Malic, S., et al., “Biocide activity against urinary catheter pathogens,” Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2014, pp. 1192-1194, vol. 58:2.
Margel et al., “Nitric oxide charged catheters as a potential strategy for prevention of hospital acquired infections,” PLoS One, 2017, p. e0174443, vol. 12:4.
Mody et al., “Enhancing Resident Safety by Preventing Healthcare-associated Infection: a national initiative to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections in nursing homes,” Clin. Infect. Dis, 2015, pp. 86-89, vol. 61.
Pickard, et al., “Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterisation in hospital: a multicentre randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, 2012, pp. 192-735, vol. 382.
Sladjana, et al., “Biocide Activity against Urinary Catheter Pathogens,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 2014, pp. 1192-1194, vol. 58.
Thallinger et al., “Cellobiose Dehydrogenase Functionalized Urinary Catheter as Novel Antibioffim System,” J. Biomed Mater. Res. Part B, 2016, pp. 448-1456, vol. 104B.
Thallinger et al., “Preventing microbial colonisation of catheters: antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of cellobiose dehydrogenase,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents,2014, pp. 402-408, vol. 44.
Thomas et al., “Inhibitory Effect of Silver Nanoparticle Fabricated Urinary Catheter on Colonization Efficiency of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 2015, pp. 68-77, vol. 149.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180199574 A1 Jul 2018 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
61668160 Jul 2012 US
61583505 Jan 2012 US
61555367 Nov 2011 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14267403 May 2014 US
Child 15918415 US
Parent PCT/US2012/063013 Nov 2012 US
Child 14267403 US