Compositions and methods for controlling a honey bee parasitic mite infestation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11229211
  • Patent Number
    11,229,211
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 14, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 25, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a formula or composition for use in reducing a honey bee parasitic mite infestation that may comprise, for example, a liquid, solid, or paste composition, comprising about 5-20% beta acids (about 5-75% by weight), about 5-75% by weight propylene glycol, about 5-75% by weight polysorbate 60, about 0.5-35% of a thixotropic material comprising, for example, fumed silica, and/or about 0.5-5% of an antioxidant comprising, for example, ascorbic acid, the composition is active against parasitic mites for more than about 14 days in the bee hives. Compositions of the present invention provide effective control, treatment, or prevention of honey bee parasitic mite infestation by inclusion of, for example, certain excipients that retard beta acid oxidation, prolong availability of active ingredient for bee uptake, improve convenience for beekeepers, or both retard beta acid oxidation and prolong the availability of active ingredient for bee uptake.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a formula or composition for use in reducing a honey bee parasitic mite infestation. Compositions of the present invention provide effective control, treatment, or prevention of honey bee parasitic mite infestations by inclusion of, for example, certain excipients that retard beta acid oxidation, prolong availability of active ingredient for bee uptake, improved convenience for beekeepers, and may both retard beta acid oxidation and prolong the availability of active ingredient for bee uptake.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

As described below, the present invention comprises compositions useful for controlling, treating, or preventing honey bee parasitic mite infections and comprising excipients that allow these compositions to stay wet and/or biologically active for at least about 14 or more days.


Exemplary compositions of the present invention may comprise about 5% to about 75% by weight hop beta acids, about 5% to about 75% by weight solvent, about 5% to about 75% by weight emulsifier, and at least one of 0.5% to about 35% by weight fumed silica and 0.5% to about 5% by weight ascorbic acid or another antioxidant. The present invention includes one or more new formulation excipients, such as a thixotropic material and/or an antioxidant material. The present invention also provides formulations suitable for use as part of, or to form all of, new delivery vehicles comprising, for example, patties, pastes, plastic porous strips, other strip materials, pads, powders, etc. Additionally, the present invention provides formulations wherein the proportion of solvent and emulsifier excipients relative to each other and/or relative to the total composition (by weight) are substantially or significantly changed relative to the conventional art.


Hop acid oxidation is caused by oxygen containing species in hops and atmospheric oxygen via auto oxidation or through secondary oxidation, where the oxygen molecule indirectly oxidizes hop acids by first reacting with hop oil compounds creating pro-oxidants and then oxidizing hop acids. Hop acids oxidize and chemically deteriorate at high temperature and in presence of oxygen (Benitez, J. L.; Foster, A.; De Keukeleire, D.; Moir, M.; Sharpe, F. R.; Verhagen, L. C.; Wetwood, K. T. Hops and hop products. In Manual of Good Practice; European Brewery Convention: 1997). Beta acids (lupulone, colupulone, and adlupulone) in hops have isoprenyl chain that is sensitive to autoxidation resulting in oxidation product hulupones (Verzele 1991, Briggs 2004) (FIG. 1). Such oxidation is detrimental to the effectiveness of hop beta acids for controlling, treating, or preventing honey bee parasitic mite infections. Natural antioxidants such as vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin A, tocopherols, carotenoids, lutein, lycopene, polyphenols like flavonoids or synthetic antioxidants such as propyl gallate, tertiary butylhydroquinone, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene could be used to prevent oxidation of hop beta acids.


The rate of oxidative degradation of beta acids increases with the increase in surface area exposed to air oxygen exposition. Krofta found higher rate of beta acid degradation when spread on surface of solid carriers such as cellulose powder or silica sand compared to leaf hops (Krofta, K., Vrabcová, S., Mikyška, A., Jurková, M., Cajka, T., & Hajslová, J. (2013). Stability of hop beta acids and their decomposition products during natural ageing (Vol. 1010) (“Krofta”)). For example, HopGuard® Strips with a thin beta acid layer of formulation allow greater exposure to oxygen in the bee hives. Such greater oxygen exposure can be detrimental to the effectiveness and/or duration of the HopGuard Strips. Here, the present invention solves problems associated with oxidation and moisture retention characteristic of conventional miticide formulations and delivery vehicles.


Thixotropic materials such as fumed silica, microparticles of alumina, aluminum nitride, carbon black, nanocarbons, could be used to form layers of formulation on delivery vehicles such as strip, gel, paste, patty or powder, to protect beta acid from oxidative degradation, prolong availability of beta acid for bee uptake, reduce drip loss and bee agitation due to dripping in hives, mask any bee repellant odor, and improve convenience for bee keepers.


Fumed silica (CAS 112945-52-5) is a low density high surface area powder which when mixed with fluids increases the viscosity and exhibits a thixotropic behavior.


Thixotropy is a time-dependent shear thinning property where the thick gel and colloids convert into fluid when agitated. Thixotropy may also be described as the property of becoming less viscous when subjected to an applied stress, shown for example by some gels that become temporarily fluid when shaken or stirred. This property is utilized in the present invention where bees receive a small dose of beta acid on interacting with the delivery system over a longer period of time instead of getting drenched, as seen with the formulations without fumed silica. In addition, fumed silica containing formulations are not chewed by bees since the cardboard strips are not exposed due to the presence of thick layers of the formulation.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a picture showing the oxidative conversion of hop beta acid, lupulone, to degradation product hulupone in the presence of heat and oxygen.



FIG. 2 provides pictures showing different formulations of HopGuard® III and various delivery methods.



FIG. 3 is a graph showing hop beta acid degradation in HopGuard® II strips under simulated beehive conditions (35° C., 35% RH) over a period of 8 days.



FIG. 4 and FIG. 5. are graphs showing hop beta acid degradation in HopGuard® II and HopGuard® II+5% Ascorbic acid (antioxidant strips) under simulated beehive conditions (35° C., 35% RH) and actual beehives, respectively. For simulated beehive conditions, the strips were collected on day 1, 3 and 7 and for actual beehive, the strips were collected on day 0 and 14.



FIG. 6 is a graph showing weight of strip based products, HopGuard® II and HopGuard® III strips under simulated in-hive conditions (35° C., 35% RH) on day 0 and day 14.



FIG. 7 is a graph showing hop beta acid oxidation of strip based products, HopGuard® II and HopGuard® III under simulated in-hive conditions (35° C., 35% RH) over a period of 30 days.



FIG. 8 are pictures showing chewing bee behavior and strip condition for HopGuard® II and HopGuard® III strips on day 14 in beehives.



FIG. 9 is a graph showing weights of different delivery products under simulated in-hive conditions (35° C., 35% RH) on day 0 and day 14.



FIG. 10 is a graph showing hop beta acid degradation of different delivery products under simulated in-hive conditions (35° C., 35% RH) on day 0 and day 14.





EXAMPLES
Example 1
Development of HopGuard® Formulations and Testing Protocol

Five Hop formulations and one control formulation with zero hop beta acid were developed at Haas Innovations Center, John I Haas, Inc., Yakima, Wash. TABLE. 1 is a table showing the composition of various HopGuard® formulations















TABLE 1







Hop Beta
Propylene
Polysor-
Fumed
Ascorbic


S.

Acid Resins
Glycol
bate 60
Silica
acid


no.
Product
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)





















1
HopGuard
33
33
33
0
0



II


2
HopGuard
33
28
33
0
5



II + 5%



Ascorbic



acid


3
HopGuard
33
10
55.25
1.75
0



III/



HopGuard



III Strip


4
HopGuard
33
10
52
5
0



III Paste


5
HopGuard
33
10
42
15
0



III Patty


6
Control
0
50
50
0
0









In one embodiment, natural antioxidant ascorbic acid was used at the rate of 5% in the formulation while reducing the propylene glycol content to develop HopGuard® II+5% ascorbic acid strips. Other natural antioxidants such as, for example, vitamin A, tocopherols, carotenoids, lutein, lycopene, polyphenols like flavonoids or synthetic antioxidants such as propyl gallate, tertiary butylhydroquinone, butylated hydroxyanisole, and butylated hydroxytoluene could be used for the same purpose.


Excipient fumed silica, a thixotropic material, was used to form gel, colloids and paste that convert into fluid when agitated due to bee interaction. The consistency of HopGuard® formulations was found to change with the level of excipient fumed silica added to the formulation, which allowed development of different delivery products such as liquid, paste, gel, patty or powder. Other materials with similar properties such as, for example, microparticles of alumina, aluminum nitride, carbon black, and nanocarbons, etc. could be used to achieve the desired outcome.


Three formulations, HopGuard® II, HopGuard® II+5% Ascorbic acid and HopGuard® III were prepared by soaking corrugated cardboard strips, with mylar backing, 17.5 (L)×1.25 (B) folded in half, with liquid formulation added at the rate of 25 g per strip. Strips were placed in an aluminum foil bag (13×5 inches) and soaked in formulation for 24 hours. HopGuard® III paste formulation was added to a permeable bag at the rate of 25 g per bag (FIG. 2). HopGuard® III patty formulation was developed into a 25 g patty and placed on an impervious cardboard sheet.


In a preferred embodiment, cardboard strip products are intended to be hung between the frames of beehives, whereas, paste and patty formula are intended to be placed on top of the frames or any other area where bees could interact with the product, for example the entrance.


For testing of formulations in the lab, a Thermolyne (oven series 9000) hot air incubator was used to simulate beehive environment with a controlled temperature of 35° C. and relative humidity of 35%. The strips were hung in the incubator, whereas the paste and patty based formulas were placed on a wire rack. Samples were pulled out in triplicate on a given time point, weighed, placed in Ziploc bags, flushed with nitrogen gas, and stored under nitrogen flush at 5° C. until analysis for beta acid using HPLC as μg/inch2 for strips and μg/g for paste and patty products.


For testing of formulations in the beehives, the products were tested in full strength bee colonies at Carl Hayden Bee Research Facility in Tucson, Ariz. For strip based formulas, two strips (25 g liquid formulation per strip) per hive were hung over the center brood frame near the middle of the frame with one half of the strip on each side of the frame. The paste and patty based products were placed on top of the center brood frames at the rate of two permeable bags (25 g each) or two patties (25 g each) per hive. Samples were pulled out in triplicate on a given time point, placed in Ziploc bags, flushed with nitrogen gas and stored under nitrogen flush at 5° C., until analysis for beta acid using HPLC.


Example 2
Inclusion of Antioxidant/s in the HopGuard® Formula Decreases Oxidative Degradation of Hop Beta Acid

In a preliminary experiment, our currently available product, HopGuard® II, was found to have 30% beta acid degradation over a period of 8 days under simulated hive conditions as described above (FIG. 3). When tested in lab, using protocol described in example 1, the HopGuard® II+5% Ascorbic acid strips were found to have no beta acid degradation (p<0.05) over a period of 7 days, where 35% degradation of beta acid was observed in the HopGuard® II product (FIG. 4). When tested in beehives, the HopGuard® II+5% Ascorbic acid strips were found to have relatively lower beta acid degradation (44% degradation) when compared with HopGuard® II product (75% degradation) over a period of 14 days (FIG. 5).


Example 3
Addition of Excipient Fumed Silica Prolongs Availability of Product from HopGuard® Strips and Retards Oxidative Degradation of Beta Acids

Two strip based products, HopGuard® II and HopGuard® III were tested for change in strip weight and beta acid degradation under simulated hive conditions over a period of 14 days using protocol described in Example 1. Strip weight and wetness were used as an indicator of the availability of product for bee uptake. Fumed silica in HopGuard® III strip prevented the reduction of strip weight via evaporative drying or drip loss, while keeping the strip wet on touch (observation), thereby enabling the strip to last longer (FIG. 6). On the other hand, HopGuard® II strips were completely dry (observation) and had a relatively greater change in weight over a period of 14 days. When tested for beta acid content, HopGuard® II strips had higher degradation of beta acid (41%) compared to HopGuard® III strips (30%) after 30 days (FIG. 7).


The strips were tested in bee hives to observe bee response to HopGuard® II and HopGuard® III over a period of 14 days. HopGuard® III strips were found wet on touch (observation) and visibly intact on day 14 whereas HopGuard® II strips were completely dry and partially or completely chewed up by the bees with mylar film exposed (FIG. 8). HopGuard® III strips were found to cause no bee agitation (which is related to the product) in the beehives due to negligible product dripping unlike HopGuard® II strips which dripped on the bees and in and around the beehive causing bee agitation. There was no or negligible bee repellency to either of the products tested.


Example 4
Excipient Fumed Silica Based HopGuard® III Paste and Patty Delivery Prolongs Availability of Product and Prevents Oxidative Degradation of Beta Acids

Two formulations, HopGuard® III paste and patty were tested for change in product weight and beta acid degradation under simulated hive conditions over a period of 14 days as described in Example 1. Strip weight and wetness were used an indicator of the availability of product for bee uptake. Both weight and beta acid content did not change (P<0.05) in the products, instead beta acid content of HopGuard® III paste was found to increase by 38% on day 14, probably due to the concentration of beta acid (FIG. 9, 10). Similar to HopGuard® III strips as discussed in example 3, HopGuard® III paste and patty product performed good and perhaps better in the bee hives.


The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A composition comprising about 5% to about 75% by weight hop beta acids, about 5% to about 29% by weight solvent, about 5% to about 75% by weight emulsifier, and about 0.5% to about 35% by weight fumed silica, wherein the hop beta acid degradation is about 30% over a period of about 30 days, and wherein the composition is moist for a period of at least about 14 days.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein at least one of the hop beta acids are potassium salts of hop beta acids; the solvent is propylene glycol; and the emulsifier is polysorbate 60.
  • 3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises about 30% to about 35% by weight hop beta acids, about 10% to about 29% by weight solvent, about 30% to about 35% by weight emulsifier, about 0.5% to about 25% by weight fumed silica and, optionally, further comprising about 5% by weight ascorbic acid.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is in the form of a liquid, a strip, a patty, a paste, a pad, or a powder.
  • 5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the fumed silica maintains composition availability for bee uptake or reduces beta acid degradation or reduces bee agitation by minimum dripping on bees in beehives.
  • 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises 0.5% to about 5% by weight ascorbic acid or another antioxidant.
  • 7. The composition of claim 6, wherein the ascorbic acid reduces beta acid degradation.
  • 8. The composition of claim 6, comprising both fumed silica and ascorbic acid.
  • 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is active against parasitic mites.
  • 10. A method of controlling a honey bee parasitic mite infestation in a honey bee population comprising: exposing a honey bee population to the composition of claim 1.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein at least one of the hop beta acids are potassium salts of hop beta acids; the solvent is propylene glycol; and the emulsifier is polysorbate 60.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, further comprising about 20% to about 35% by weight hop beta acids, about 20% to about 29% by weight solvent, about 20% to about 35% by weight emulsifier, and 15% by weight fumed silica and, optionally, further comprising about 5% by weight ascorbic acid.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, further comprising providing the composition in the form of a strip, a patty, a paste, a pad, or a powder.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, further comprising 0.5% to about 5% by weight ascorbic acid.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, further comprising providing ascorbic acid in an amount sufficient to reduce beta acid degradation.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, comprising both fumed silica and ascorbic acid.
  • 17. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is in the form of a liquid, a patty, a paste, or a pad.
  • 18. A composition comprising about 5% to about 75% by weight hop beta acids, about 5% to about 75% by weight solvent, about 5% to about 75% by weight emulsifier, and about 0.5% to about 6% by weight fumed silica, wherein the hop beta acid degradation is about 30% over a period of about 30 days, and wherein the composition is moist for a period of at least about 14 days.
  • 19. The composition of claim 18, wherein at least one of the hop beta acids are potassium salts of hop beta acids; the solvent is propylene glycol; and the emulsifier is polysorbate 60.
  • 20. The composition of claim 18, wherein the composition comprises about 30% to about 35% by weight hop beta acids, about 10% to about 29% by weight solvent, about 30% to about 35% by weight emulsifier, about 1% to about 6% by weight fumed silica, and further comprising about 5% by weight ascorbic acid.
  • 21. The composition of claim 18, wherein the composition is in the form of a liquid, a strip, or a paste.
  • 22. The composition of claim 18, wherein the composition comprises about 1% to about 6% by weight fumed silica.
  • 23. The composition of claim 18, wherein the fumed silica maintains composition availability for bee uptake or reduces beta acid degradation or reduces bee agitation by minimum dripping on bees in beehives.
  • 24. The composition of claim 18, wherein the composition further comprises about 3% to about 5% by weight ascorbic acid.
  • 25. The composition of claim 24, wherein the ascorbic acid reduces beta acid degradation.
  • 26. The composition of claim 18, further comprising ascorbic acid.
  • 27. The composition of claim 18, wherein the composition is active against parasitic mites.
US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
3615660 Bavisotto et al. Oct 1971 A
3781425 Martin et al. Dec 1973 A
4002683 Todd, Jr. Jan 1977 A
4148873 Owades Apr 1979 A
4170638 Owades Oct 1979 A
4281061 Zuk et al. Jul 1981 A
4299816 Polyakov et al. Nov 1981 A
4562794 Speckman Jan 1986 A
4682380 Martin Jul 1987 A
4775534 Bartlett et al. Oct 1988 A
4837216 Mehlhorn et al. Jun 1989 A
4844939 Todd, Jr. Jul 1989 A
4847292 Katz et al. Jul 1989 A
4867731 Willard et al. Sep 1989 A
4876265 Schmid Oct 1989 A
4965287 Stendel et al. Oct 1990 A
5023359 Bounias et al. Jun 1991 A
5069651 Arndt Dec 1991 A
5070091 Mehlhorn et al. Dec 1991 A
5082975 Todd, Jr. et al. Jan 1992 A
5135758 Arnold et al. Aug 1992 A
5158788 Lavens et al. Oct 1992 A
5166449 Todd, Jr. et al. Nov 1992 A
5227162 Ferrari Jul 1993 A
5230894 Robert et al. Jul 1993 A
5286506 Millis et al. Feb 1994 A
5312622 Nagy et al. May 1994 A
5348511 Gross et al. Sep 1994 A
5370863 Barney et al. Dec 1994 A
5372817 Locke et al. Dec 1994 A
5455038 Barney et al. Oct 1995 A
5583262 Maye et al. Dec 1996 A
5624701 Maye et al. Apr 1997 A
5750129 Wakarchuk May 1998 A
5827895 Nutter et al. Oct 1998 A
5849317 Shorey et al. Dec 1998 A
6010390 Harper Jan 2000 A
6037374 Kochansky Mar 2000 A
6083254 Evans Jul 2000 A
6096350 Kemp et al. Aug 2000 A
6204283 Black et al. Mar 2001 B1
6221375 Howse Apr 2001 B1
6251461 Johnson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6277371 Haragsim et al. Aug 2001 B1
6419943 Sakurada et al. Jul 2002 B1
6450858 Schmitz Sep 2002 B1
6451365 King et al. Sep 2002 B1
6468129 Griffith Oct 2002 B1
6475061 Huang Nov 2002 B1
6475537 King et al. Nov 2002 B1
6476015 Turos et al. Nov 2002 B1
6585557 Remon et al. Jul 2003 B1
6595828 Page, Jr. et al. Jul 2003 B2
6620025 Scheuneman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6620446 King et al. Sep 2003 B2
6646014 Watkins Nov 2003 B2
6702645 Vanderpool Mar 2004 B2
6820773 Orth Nov 2004 B1
6837770 Ruzicka Jan 2005 B2
6843985 Erickson, Jr. et al. Jan 2005 B2
7087849 Brown et al. Aug 2006 B2
7137864 Swanson Nov 2006 B2
7597912 Probasco Oct 2009 B2
7767234 Probasco Aug 2010 B2
7879348 Volby Feb 2011 B2
9295252 Probasco et al. Mar 2016 B2
9545110 Probasco et al. Jan 2017 B2
20010014346 Watkins Aug 2001 A1
20020034529 Prince et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020051804 Probasco et al. May 2002 A1
20020094756 Labesque Jul 2002 A1
20020151249 Scheuneman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020182977 Page, Jr. et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030010817 Lingle et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030027490 Wilkinson Feb 2003 A1
20030032669 Verbruggen et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030044443 Erickson, Jr. et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060379 Souter et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030154508 Stevens et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030190860 Vanderpool Oct 2003 A1
20030215535 Wilson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030228814 Barney et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040077291 Arthur et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040131709 Berdahl et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040175480 Seman et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040229542 Ruzicka Nov 2004 A1
20050031743 Areso Feb 2005 A1
20050043404 Probasco et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050048093 Milani et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050049230 Henrich et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090560 Erickson, Jr. et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050095954 Castillo May 2005 A1
20050220914 Probasco et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060008492 Janowicz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009122 Swanson Jan 2006 A1
20060009211 Sato Jan 2006 A1
20060013870 Kuhrts Jan 2006 A1
20060141904 Teal et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070026765 Renn Feb 2007 A1
20070059333 Volby Mar 2007 A1
20070232188 Probasco Oct 2007 A1
20070248549 Kuhrts Oct 2007 A1
20080026673 Probasco Jan 2008 A1
20090104288 Probasco Apr 2009 A1
20100087121 Probasco Apr 2010 A1
20100227010 Jones Sep 2010 A1
20110182958 Omidbakhsh Jul 2011 A1
20130145679 Nenninger Jun 2013 A1
20130337520 Fox Dec 2013 A1
20140127968 Probasco May 2014 A1
20150150252 Probasco et al. Jun 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
0 152 190 Jan 1985 EP
0 212 623 Mar 1987 EP
0 339 147 Nov 1989 EP
0 441 750 Aug 1991 EP
0 681 029 Nov 1995 EP
0 816 430 Jan 1998 EP
0 824 093 Feb 1998 EP
592090 Sep 1947 GB
1058975 Feb 1967 GB
2 330 076 Apr 1999 GB
50-24244 Mar 1975 JP
57-80304 May 1982 JP
9409759 May 1994 WO
9733971 Sep 1997 WO
9909842 Mar 1999 WO
0106877 Feb 2001 WO
WO-0176367 Oct 2001 WO
2007037905 Apr 2007 WO
2008060591 May 2008 WO
2009098300 Aug 2009 WO
2009099646 Aug 2009 WO
2010131058 Nov 2010 WO
2012170420 Dec 2012 WO
2013185059 Dec 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
“Antibiotics: Antibacterial Agents,” retrieved from the internet http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/A/Antibiotics.html on Nov. 7, 2016, 10 pages.
“Culpeper's Complete Herbal: A book of Natural Remedies for Ancient Ills,” Wordsworth Reference, pp. 134-135, 1995 (2 pages).
“HopGuard Section 18 Specific Exemption,” BetaTec hop products, 1 page.
“HopGuard: the new Varroa pesticide,” Honey Bee Suite, downloaded Jun. 17, 2016, Online document obtained from http://honeybeesuite.com/hoguard-the-new-varroa-pesticide/, 5 pages.
“The Small Hive Beetle: A New Pest of Honey Bees,” Alabama A&M and Auburn Universities, 2001 (4 pages).
“Tracheal Mites,” Mid-Atlantic Apicultural Research and Extension Consortium, MAAREC Publication 4.2, 2000 (2 pages).
“Varroa Mites,” Mid-Atlantic Apicultural Research and Extension Consortium, MAAREC Publication 4.7, 2005 (2 pages).
BetaTecHopProducts' channel, “HopGuard—Varroa Mite Control,” YouTube, Uploaded on Mar. 5, 2011, Online document obtained from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2y4mdPhio.
Botanix, “Hops Products Isohop” retrieved Apr. 16, 2003 from http://www.gne22.dial.pipex.com/isohop.html, 1 page.
Chapter 2.2.6: Tropilaelaps Infestation of Honey Bees (Tropilaelaps spp.). OIE Terrestrial Manual 2008, pp. 419-423, http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.02.06_TROPILAELAPS.pdf.
DeGrandi-Hoffman et al., “The effects of beta acids from hops (Humulus lupulus) on mortality of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae),” Exp Appl Acarol 58:407-421, 2012.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 12796924.4, dated May 21, 2015, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13800867.7, dated Oct. 20, 2015, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14735165.4, dated Apr. 29, 2016, 11 pages.
First Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2014203897, dated Dec. 2, 2016, 3 pages.
Haas Products & Applications, http://www.john-i-haas.com/products/getinfo_products.htm?prod=isohop, retrieved Nov. 7, 2016, 2 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/23984, dated Aug. 29, 2008, 3 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2014/010347, dated May 2, 2014, 3 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/040907, dated Dec. 28, 2012, 3 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2013/044757, dated Dec. 12, 2013, 3 pages.
Jones et al., “Repellent and Oviposition-Deterring Effects of Hop-Beta Acids on the Two-Spotted Spider Mite Tetranychus Urticae,” Pesticide Science 47:165-169, 1996.
Jones, “Potential Control of Two-Spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus Urticae Koch, Using Hop β-Fraction,” 1998, pp. 1-169, A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the Diploma of Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine.
Kaneda et al., “Beer Adsorption on a Lipid Membrane as Related to Sensory Evaluation”, Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 59(8):2001, http://www.asbcnet.org/publications/journal/vol/abstracts/0912-04a.htm, 1 page (Abstract Only).
Losel et al., “The Potential of Semiochemicals for Control of Phorodon humuli (Homoptera: Aphididae),” Pestic. Sci. 48:293-303, 1996.
Newsletter of the Bayside Brewers Club Incorporated, May 1996, http://www.home.alone.net.au/bbc/bbcmay.html, 6 pages.
Nordenfors et al., “Effects of Temperature and Humidity on Oviposition, Molting, and Longevity of Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Demanyssidae),” Journal of Medical Entomology 36(1):68-72, 1999.
Sammataro et al., “Parasitic Mites of Honey Bees: Life History, Implications, and Impact,” Annu. Rev. Entomol 45:519-548, 2000.
Sharma et al., “Efficacy of Some Acaricides Against Extoparasitic Mite Tropilaelaps clareae Infesting European Honey Bee Apis mellifera,” Indian J. Agric. Res 37(1):60-63, 2003 (6 pages).
Simpson, “Studies on the Sensitivity of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Hop Bitter Acids,” J. Inst. Brew. 99:405-411, 1993.
Simpson, “Synergism Between Hop Resins and Phosphoric Acid and its Relevance to the Acid Washing of Yeast,” J. Instr. Brew. 93:405-406, 1987.
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 12796924.4 dated Jan. 28, 2015, 5 pages.
Sutherland, “Spider Mites,” New Mexico State University O & T Guide, O-#08, 2006 (3 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190343126 A1 Nov 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62671064 May 2018 US