The present invention relates to methods and compositions for treating subterranean formations, and more specifically, to improved methods and compositions for degrading filter cake deposited in a subterranean formation.
Filter cake, the residue deposited on a permeable medium when servicing fluids contact the medium under a pressure, is formed in a variety of subterranean operations such as drilling, fracturing, and gravel packing. A filter cake is often desirable, at least temporarily, in subterranean operations as it may act to stem the flow of a servicing fluid from its desired location, to the surrounding subterranean formation. For instance, where the servicing fluid is a drilling fluid, a filter cake formed on the wall of the well bore may act to keep the drilling fluid in its desired location, in the annulus between the well bore and the drill pipe, rather than allowing the drilling fluid to leach off into the surrounding formation. Loss of drilling, fracturing, gravel transport and other servicing fluids into the formation represents an increased expense and, if too much fluid is lost, the attendant increase in damage to the producing zones in the formation. Moreover, the presence of a filter cake may add strength and stability to the formation surfaces on which the filter cake forms, as in the case of soft sandstone formations.
Filter cakes may be formed during drilling and fracturing operations. Once a well bore is established, producing zones along the well bore may be treated to increase their permeabilities and/or conductivities. One such production stimulation treatment involves hydraulically fracturing the formation with a viscous treating fluid to create one or more cracks or “fractures.” As a fracture is created, a portion of the fluid contained in the viscous fracturing fluid leaks off into the formation and creates a filter cake comprising deposited viscosifying agent and fluid loss control agent on the walls of the fracture and the formation. The filter cake acts as a physical barrier to liquid travel that, as described above, helps reduce fluid loss into the producing zone. The filter cake also presents a barrier to flow of liquid from the zone, thus, after the fracturing operation has been completed, the filter cake generally needs to be removed so that the formation may be placed on production.
Sand control operations, such as gravel packing, are also common after a well bore is drilled. One common type of gravel packing operation involves placing a gravel pack screen in the well bore and packing the surrounding annulus between the screen and the well bore with gravel of a specific size designed to prevent the passage of formation sand. The gravel pack screen is generally a filter assembly used to retain the gravel placed during gravel pack operation. A wide range of sizes and screen configurations are available to suit the characteristics of the gravel pack sand used. Similarly, a wide range of sizes of gravel is available to suit the characteristics of the unconsolidated or poorly consolidated particulates in the subterranean formation. The resulting structure presents a barrier to migrating sand from the formation while still permitting fluid flow. When installing the gravel pack, the gravel is carried to the formation in the form of a slurry by mixing the gravel with a transport fluid. Gravel packs act, inter alia, to stabilize the formation while causing minimal impairment to well productivity. The gravel, inter alia, acts to prevent the particulates from occluding the screen or migrating with the produced fluids, and the screen, inter alia, acts to prevent the gravel from entering the production tubing. Often, gravel packs are placed along a well bore having a filter cake on its walls.
While filter cakes may be beneficial, it is generally necessary to remove filter cakes from producing zones once the well is placed into production. One known method for the removal of filter cakes from producing formations involves including an acid-soluble particulate solid bridging agent for bridging over the formation pores in the drilling, fracturing, gravel transport or other servicing fluid that forms the filter cake. Such an acid-soluble filter cake could then be removed by placing a strongly acidic acid solution in contact with the filter cake and allowing that solution to remain in contact for a period of time sufficient to dissolve the filter cake.
One consideration in removing a deposited filter cake from a subterranean well bore formation involves the timing of such removal. For instance, in situations where sand control of the formation is a concern, a filter cake offers some degree of control over unconsolidated particulates in the subterranean formation while placing the gravel pack. For example, if the filter cake is removed prior to gravel packing, the unconsolidated particulates are not controlled and well bore stability problems may arise causing the collapse of the bore hole and preventing the installation of a gravel pack. While installing the screen and placing the gravel before removing the filter cake helps control unconsolidated particulates and maintain bore hole stability, it also makes the filter cake itself more difficult to remove. This is because the screen and gravel represents a physical barrier between the filter cake on walls of the well bore and the acidic fluid used to remove the filer cake.
One conventional method that attempts to overcome that problem involves placing a breaker (e.g., an oxidizer, ester, enzyme, or the like) in the fracturing, transport or other servicing fluid that creates the filter cake in hopes that the breaker will permeate the filter cake and break it down. However, because the breaker is dissolved in the servicing fluid and not all of the servicing fluid remains in the subterranean formation much of the breaker that is used gets circulated out of the well bore and does not interact with the filter cake as desired.
The present invention relates to methods and compositions for treating subterranean formations, and more specifically, to improved methods and compositions for degrading filter cake deposited on a subterranean formation.
One embodiment of a method of the present invention involves degrading filter cake comprising the steps of providing particulates coated with an acid-releasing degradable material; placing the particulates into a subterranean formation so that they form a pack substantially adjacent to a filter cake; allowing the acid-releasing degradable material to produce acid; and allowing the acid to contact and degrade a portion of the filter cake.
Another embodiment of the present invention involves gravel pack comprising gravel particles coated with an acid-releasing degradable material. Still another embodiment of the present invention involves a proppant pack comprising proppant particles coated with an acid-releasing degradable material.
The objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of the preferred embodiments that follows.
The present invention relates to methods and compositions for treating subterranean formations, and more specifically, to improved methods and compositions for degrading filter cake deposited on a subterranean formation.
Certain embodiments of the compositions of the present invention comprise particulates coated with an acid-releasing degradable material that releases acid over time. The released acid may be used to degrade an acid-soluble filter cake substantially adjacent to the coated particulates. In some embodiments the acid-releasing degradable material used to coat the particulates acts at a delayed rate to produce acid such that the particles may be placed in the subterranean formation adjacent to the filter cake before a substantial amount of acid is released. The compositions and methods of the present invention are suitable for use in removing any filter cake that degrades in the presence of an acid.
Any particulate material suitable for use in conjunction with subterranean applications is suitable for use as the particulate in the compositions and methods of the present invention. Natural sand, quartz sand, particulate garnet, glass, ground walnut hulls, nylon pellets, bauxite, ceramics, polymeric materials, or the like are all suitable. Suitable sizes range from 4 to 100 U.S. mesh, in certain preferred embodiments the sizes range from 10 to 70 US mesh. The particulate material of the present invention may be used as gravel particles used in sand control operations, as proppant particles used in fracturing operations, or as any other particulate employed in subterranean operations that may be placed substantially adjacent to a filter cake.
Acid-releasing degradable materials that may be used in conjunction with the present invention are those materials that can be coated onto a particulate and that are substantially water insoluble such that they degrade over time, rather than instantaneously, to produce an acid. Examples of suitable acid-releasing degradable materials include substantially water insoluble esters such as ortho esters; poly(orthoesters); aliphatic polyesters; lactides, poly(lactides); glycolides; poly(glycolides); poly(ε-caprolactone); poly(hydroxybutyrate); substantially water insoluble anhydrides; poly(anhydrides); and poly(amino acids).
Polymers suitable for use as an acid-releasing degradable material of the present invention may be considered degradable if the degradation is due, inter alia, to chemical and/or radical process such as hydrolysis, oxidation, or enzymatic decomposition. The degradability of a polymer depends at least in part on its backbone structure, type of repetitive unit, composition, sequence, length, molecular geometry, molecular weight, morphology (e.g., crystallinity, size of spherulites, and orientation), hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, surface area, and additives. Also, the environment to which the polymer is subjected may affect how it degrades, e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen, microorganisms, enzymes, pH, and the like.
Blends of certain acid-releasing degradable materials may also be suitable. One example of a suitable blend of materials includes a blend of a poly(lactic acid) and lactide. Other materials that undergo degradation and produce acid may also be suitable, if the products of the degradation do not undesirably interfere with either the subterranean treatment being performed or the subterranean formation.
In choosing the appropriate acid-releasing degradable material, one should consider the degradation products that will result. Also, these degradation products should not adversely affect other operations or components. The conditions of the well, e.g., well bore temperature and environmental factors, must also be considered when choosing an acid-releasing degradable material. For instance, polyesters have been found to be suitable for well bore temperatures in the range of 60° F. to 400° F. Generally, smaller molecule acid-releasing degradable materials are suitable for use in lower temperature application and larger molecule acid-releasing degradable materials are suitable for use in higher-temperature applications. It is within the ability of one skilled in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, to select a suitable acid-releasing degradable material.
When used in the present invention, a preferable result is achieved if the degradable material degrades slowly over time as opposed to instantaneously. Even more preferable results have been obtained when the degradable material does not substantially degrade until after the subterranean treatment, such as a gravel packing or fracturing operation, has been substantially completed.
The acid-releasing degradable material of the present invention may be coated onto particulate material by any means known in the art. In one embodiment, the particles may be coated with the acid-releasing degradable material “on-the-fly.” The term “on-the-fly” is used herein to mean that one flowing stream is continuously introduced into another flowing stream so that the streams are combined and mixed while continuing to flow as a single stream as part of the on-going treatment. Such mixing can also be described as “real-time” mixing. One such on-the-fly mixing method would involve continuously conveying the particles and the acid-releasing degradable material to a mixing vessel. Once inside the mixing vessel, the particles would be coated with the acid-releasing degradable material and continuously removed from the mixing vessel. In that situation, a sand screw could be used both to aid in mixing the particulates, be they gravel, proppant, or some other particulate, with the acid-releasing degradable material and to remove the acid-releasing degradable material-coated particles from the mixing tank. As is well understood by those skilled in the art, batch or partial batch mixing may also be used to accomplish such coating.
Where the chosen acid-releasing degradable material is a solid material at ambient temperatures it may be advantageous to mix the acid-releasing degradable material with a solvent to facilitate the coating of the acid-releasing degradable material onto the particulate material. A variety of solvents known in the art are suitable for using the present invention. Some such solvents include, but are not limited to acetone, propylene carbonate, dipropylglycolmethylether, methylene chloride, isopropyl alcohol, and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments of the present invention the particle material, such as gravel in a gravel packing operation or proppant in a fracturing operation, is coated with from about 0.1% to about 20% acid-releasing degradable material by weight of the gravel particles, more preferably from about 0.5% to about 10% acid-releasing degradable material by weight of the gravel particles and most preferably from about 1% to about 8% acid-releasing degradable material by weight of the particulate material. In some embodiments of the present invention, all of the particles used in the subterranean operation are coated with an acid-releasing degradable material of the present invention. In other embodiments, only a portion of the particles is coated. Where the percentage of particles coated is less than 100%, it may be desirable to coat a higher percentage of the acid-releasing degradable material on the coated particles. It is within the ability of one skilled in the art to determine the amount of acid-releasing degradable material that will be necessary to sufficiently degrade the filter cake and to coat enough particles with enough acid-releasing degradable material to achieve that goal.
Where the coated particles of the present invention are used in a sand control operation such as gravel packing, the gravel pack may be formed using any technique known in the art. In one technique, gravel particles at least partially coated with an acid-releasing material are slurried into a delivery fluid and pumped into the well bore having a filter cake deposited thereon and substantially adjacent to the zone of the subterranean formation that has been fitted with a gravel pack screen. The gravel material is separated from the slurry as the delivery fluid is forced into the well bore and through the screen. The gravel particles are not able to flow through the mesh of the screen and are left behind, thus forming a gravel pack. In a gravel pack formed from such coated particles, the acid-releasing degradable material substantially degrades the adjacent filter cake.
Similarly, where the coated particles of the present invention are used in a fracturing operation, the proppant pack formed inside the fracture with the coated particles of the present invention may be formed using any technique known in the art. In one technique, proppant particles at least partially coated with an acid-releasing material are slurried into a fracturing fluid and pumped into a fractured subterranean formation. The proppant particles are then placed in the fracture and form a proppant pact substantially adjacent to walls of the fracture. Once the proppant pack is substantially formed, the acid-releasing degradable material produces a sufficient amount of acid at least to partially degrade the filter cake on the walls of the fracture.
To facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, the following examples of preferred embodiments are given. In no way should the following examples be read to limit the scope of the invention.
Polylactic acid was mixed with a methylene chloride solvent to form a solution capable of coating particulate matter. That solution was then mixed in thirds to 267 grams of 20/40 particulate sand and mixed together, after which the solvent was stripped from the coated sand by vacuum action to create free flowing coated sand. The coated sand weighed 273 grams, representing a 2% coating of polylactic acid.
The acid-releasing degradable material-coated gravel particles were then placed in a high-temperature, high-pressure cell against a calcium carbonate filter cake. The cell was set at 200° F. at 500-psi and allowed to soak static for three days following which the filtrate valve on the cell was opened and brine flowed freely. If the filter cake had been intact after the three days, only a slow drip would have flowed from the filtrate valve, even under 500-psi of pressure. Thus, such free flow of brine indicated that the acid-releasing degradable material had successfully broken the filter cake. The cell was then broken down and visual inspection confirmed that the calcium carbonate filter cake had been substantially degraded.
Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit and scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2238671 | Woodhouse | Apr 1941 | A |
2703316 | Palmer | Mar 1955 | A |
3173484 | Huitt et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3195635 | Fast | Jul 1965 | A |
3272650 | MacVittie | Sep 1966 | A |
3302719 | Fischer | Feb 1967 | A |
3364995 | Atkins et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3366178 | Malone et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3455390 | Gallus | Jul 1969 | A |
3784585 | Schmitt et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3819525 | Hattenbrun | Jun 1974 | A |
3828854 | Templeton et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3868998 | Lybarger et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3912692 | Casey et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3948672 | Harnsberger | Apr 1976 | A |
3955993 | Curtice | May 1976 | A |
3960736 | Free et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3968840 | Tate | Jul 1976 | A |
3998272 | Maly | Dec 1976 | A |
3998744 | Arnold et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4068718 | Cooke, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4169798 | DeMartino | Oct 1979 | A |
4172066 | Zweigle et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4261421 | Watanabe | Apr 1981 | A |
4387769 | Erbstoesser et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4460052 | Gockel | Jul 1984 | A |
4470915 | Conway | Sep 1984 | A |
4498995 | Gockel | Feb 1985 | A |
4526695 | Erbstoesser et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4694905 | Armbruster | Sep 1987 | A |
4715967 | Bellis | Dec 1987 | A |
4716964 | Erbstoesser et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4785884 | Armbruster | Nov 1988 | A |
4797262 | Dewitz | Jan 1989 | A |
4809783 | Hollenbeck et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817721 | Pober | Apr 1989 | A |
4843118 | Lai et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848467 | Cantu et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4886354 | Welch et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4957165 | Cantu et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961466 | Himes et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4986353 | Clark et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986354 | Cantu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986355 | Casad et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5082056 | Tackett, Jr. | Jan 1992 | A |
5142023 | Gruber et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5216050 | Sinclair | Jun 1993 | A |
5247059 | Gruber et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249628 | Surjaatmadja | Oct 1993 | A |
5295542 | Cole et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5325923 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330005 | Card et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5359026 | Gruber | Oct 1994 | A |
5360068 | Sprunt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363916 | Himes et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373901 | Norman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5386874 | Laramay et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396957 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402846 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5439055 | Card et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5460226 | Lawson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464060 | Hale et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475080 | Gruber et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484881 | Gruber et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492177 | Yeh et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497830 | Boles et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499678 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505787 | Yamaguchi | Apr 1996 | A |
5512071 | Yam et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5536807 | Gruber et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5591700 | Harris et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594095 | Gruber et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5604186 | Hunt et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607905 | Dobson, Jr. et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5670473 | Scepanski | Sep 1997 | A |
5698322 | Tsai et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5765642 | Surjaatmadja | Jun 1998 | A |
5791415 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5833000 | Weaver et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849401 | El-Afandi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853048 | Weaver et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5893416 | Read | Apr 1999 | A |
5908073 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924488 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5964291 | Bourne et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6004400 | Bishop et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024170 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028113 | Scepanski | Feb 2000 | A |
6047772 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6114410 | Betzold | Sep 2000 | A |
6123965 | Jacob et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131661 | Conner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135987 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143698 | Murphey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162766 | Muir et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169058 | Le et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172011 | Card et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189615 | Sydansk | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202751 | Chatterji et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209643 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6209646 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214773 | Harris et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242390 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260622 | Blok et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6311773 | Todd et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323307 | Bigg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326458 | Gruber et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328105 | Betzold | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357527 | Norman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364945 | Chatterji et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380138 | Ischy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387986 | Moradi-Araghi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390195 | Nguyen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394185 | Constien | May 2002 | B1 |
6422314 | Todd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454003 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485947 | Rajgarhia et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488763 | Brothers et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494263 | Todd | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508305 | Brannon et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527051 | Reddy et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554071 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569814 | Brady et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6599863 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6667279 | Hessert et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669771 | Tokiwa et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681856 | Chatterji et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686328 | Binder | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702023 | Harris et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710019 | Sawdon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6761218 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763888 | Harris et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6817414 | Lee | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6896058 | Munoz, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6949491 | Cooke, Jr. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
20010016562 | Muir et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020036088 | Todd | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020125012 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030060374 | Cooke, Jr. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030114314 | Ballard et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130133 | Vallmer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030188766 | Banerjee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234103 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040014607 | Sinclair et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040040706 | Hossaini et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055747 | Lee | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040094300 | Sullivan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106525 | Willbert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138068 | Rimmer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152601 | Still et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152602 | Boles | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216876 | Lee | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231845 | Cooke, Jr. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040261993 | Nguyen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261995 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261996 | Munoz, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261999 | Nguyen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006095 | Justus et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028976 | Nguyen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103496 | Todd et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050252659 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272613 | Cooke, Jr. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 510 762 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 879 935 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 879 935 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 413 710 | Apr 2004 | EP |
WO 9315127 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9407949 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9408078 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9408090 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9509879 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9711845 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9927229 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 200057022 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 200102698 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0187797 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 200102698 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0212674 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03027431 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03027431 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2004007905 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 04037946 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 04038176 | May 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050034865 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |