Patent Grant
11479792
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing with 58 sequences, which has been submitted via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Jun. 29, 2022, is named 39028-50238-Seqeunce-listing.txt, and is 199 kilobytes (KB) in size.
The mass production of cells for biomass production remains limited by several factors, thus limiting final yields. Examples of such factors include (1) accumulation of extracellular metabolic waste products such as ammonia/ammonium hydroxide, in the cell culture medium to toxic levels, (2) depletion of necessary nutrients, such as glutamine, in the cell culture medium, requiring a constant supply and supplementation of such nutrients, incurring both expense and additional manipulation of the cells, and the (3) requirement for supplemented proteins, such as growth factors, which support the productivity of a cultivation process.
Provided herein are compositions and methods that address this need.
Provided herein are compositions and methods to make and use modified cells, for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of cell cultures, increasing the cell density of metazoan cell cultures, and for making a cultured edible product for human or non-human consumption.
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, the method comprising: (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and albumin; and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure.
In another aspect, provided herein is a method for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, the method comprising: (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or a combination thereof; and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure.
In yet another aspect, provided herein is a method for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, the method comprising: (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or a combination thereof; (b) introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence encoding a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT); and (c) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure.
In one aspect provided herein is a method of decreasing the concentration of ammonia and/or ammonium hydroxide in the medium of cells in culture comprising increasing the expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) protein in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of ammonia (i.e. ammonium hydroxide) in the medium is decreased by at least 2.5%.
In another aspect, provided herein is a method of increasing the production of glutamine in cells comprising increasing the expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) protein in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of glutamine in the cells is increased by at least 2.5%.
In another aspect, provided herein, is a method of increasing the concentration of Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in the medium of cells in culture comprising increasing the expression of IGF protein in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of IGF in the medium is increased by at least 2.5% or is increased to at least 0.001 ng/mL.
In another aspect, provided herein is a method of increasing the concentration of albumin in the medium of cells in culture comprising increasing the expression of albumin in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of albumin in the medium is increased at least 2.5% or is increased to at least 0.1 μg/mL.
In one aspect, provided herein is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product, the method comprising: (a) introducing one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or a combination thereof into myogenic cells; (b) optionally introducing a polynucleotide sequence encoding a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) into the cells; (c) inducing myogenic differentiation of the cells expressing GS, IGF, albumin or combinations thereof and optionally TERT, wherein the differentiated cells form myocytes and multinucleated myotubes; and (d) culturing the myocytes and myotubes to generate skeletal muscle fibers, thereby producing a cultured edible product.
In another aspect, provided herein is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product, the method comprising: (a) overexpressing GS, IGF, albumin, or a combination thereof in a self-renewing cell line, wherein the cell line is a myogenic transcription factor-modified cell line, and wherein the cell line is of a livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species; (b) inducing myogenic differentiation of the cell line, wherein the differentiated cell line forms myocytes and multinucleated myotubes; and (c) culturing the myocytes and myotubes to generate skeletal muscle fibers, thereby producing a cultured edible product. In another aspect provided herein is a cultured edible product produced by the in vitro method.
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for increasing the secretion of glutamine by cells into a culture medium, the method comprising increasing the expression of a glutamine synthetase (GS) protein in the cells, wherein the cells are from livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of glutamine secreted into the culture medium is increased by at least 2.5%.
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for increasing the rate of proliferation of cells in a cultivation infrastructure, comprising: (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or a combination thereof; and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure, wherein the cells are from livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species.
In another aspect, provided herein is a method for decreasing death of cells in a cultivation infrastructure, comprising: (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or a combination thereof; and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure, wherein the cells are from livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species.
In another aspect, provided herein is a method for increasing protein production in cells in a cultivation infrastructure, comprising: (a) introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence encoding insulin-like growth factor (IGF); and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure, wherein the cells are from livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species.
In another aspect provided herein is a cultured edible product comprising cells having increased expression of GS, increased expression of IGF, increased expression of albumin, increased expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), loss-of-function mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CM) proteins, increased expression of YAP, increased expression of TAZ, and/or increased expression of myogenic transcription factors.
In another aspect provided herein is a construct comprising any one of the sequences selected from Tables 1A and 1B.
In another aspect provided herein is an expression vector comprising any one of the sequences selected from Tables 1A and 1B.
In another aspect provided herein is a cell comprising an expression vector comprising any one of the sequences selected from Tables 1A and 1B. In some embodiments, the cell is from a livestock, poultry, game, or aquatic species.
Provided herein are compositions and methods to make and use engineered cells, for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of cell cultures. Specifically, provided herein are exemplary methods of increasing culture density (e.g. cell density of metazoan cells in culture) and methods for producing cultured edible product. Also provided are methods of making and using cells with reduced requirements for glutamine supplementation, and reduced supplementation with certain animal-cell secreted components such as insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and albumin.
Before describing certain embodiments in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular compositions or biological systems, which can vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular illustrative embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meaning in the art, within the context of this invention and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms are discussed below or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner in describing the compositions and methods of the invention and how to make and use them. The scope and meaning of any use of a term will be apparent from the specific context in which the term is used. As such, the definitions set forth herein are intended to provide illustrative guidance in ascertaining particular embodiments of the invention, without limitation to particular compositions or biological systems.
As used in the present disclosure and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural references unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
Throughout the present disclosure and the appended claims, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element or group of elements but not the exclusion of any other element or group of elements.
Standard techniques may be used for recombinant DNA, oligonucleotide synthesis, and tissue culture and transduction (e.g., electroporation, transfection). Enzymatic reactions and purification techniques may be performed according to manufacturer's specifications or as commonly accomplished in the art or as described herein. These and related techniques and procedures may be generally performed according to conventional methods well known in the art and as described in various general and more specific references that are cited and discussed throughout the present specification. Unless specific definitions are provided, the nomenclature utilized in connection with, and the laboratory procedures and techniques of, molecular biology, analytical chemistry, synthetic organic chemistry, and medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry described herein are those well-known and commonly used in the art. Standard techniques may be used for recombinant technology, molecular biological, microbiological, chemical syntheses, chemical analyses, pharmaceutical preparation, production, and delivery.
Cells
Provided herein are methods for modifying cells to overexpress and/or inhibit certain gene products, for the purpose of achieving increased cell density and in some embodiments, for the purpose of providing a cultured edible product. For example, in certain aspects, cells modified as described herein may be cultivated for food production, e.g. production of cultured chicken, cultured beef, and cultured fish.
The cells used in the methods of the present disclosure can be primary cells, or cell lines. The methods provided herein are applicable to any metazoan cell in culture. In various embodiments, methods of the present disclosure may use any one of the cell populations described herein.
In some embodiments, the cells are harvested for the production of cell-based food products, such as cultured edible product from an animal (e.g. cultured poultry, cultured livestock, cultured game, cultured fish). Thus in some embodiments, the methods utilize cells with the potential to differentiate into skeletal muscle. In certain embodiments, the cells are from livestock such as domestic cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, camels, water buffalo, rabbits and the like. In certain embodiments, the cells are from poultry such as domestic chicken, turkeys, ducks, geese, pigeons and the like. In certain embodiments, the cells are from game species such as wild deer, gallinaceous fowl, waterfowl, hare and the like. In certain embodiments, the cells are from aquatic species or semi-aquatic species harvested commercially from wild fisheries or aquaculture operations, or for sport, including certain fish, crustaceans, mollusks, cephalopods, cetaceans, crocodilians, turtles, frogs and the like. In certain embodiments, the cells are from exotic, conserved or extinct animal species. In certain embodiments, the cells are from any metazoan species demonstrating the capacity for skeletal muscle tissue specification. In certain embodiments, the cells are modifiable by a genetic switch to induce rapid and efficient conversion of the cells to skeletal muscle for cultured food production (e.g. cultured poultry, cultured livestock, cultured game, and cultured fish).
In some embodiments, the cells are from Gallus gallus, Bos taurus, Sous scrofa, Meleagris gallopavo, Anas platyrynchos, Salmo salar, Thunnus thynnus, Ovis aries, Coturnix coturnix, Capra aegagrus hircus, or Homarus americanus.
In some embodiments, the cells are from any animal species intended for human or non-human dietary consumption.
In some embodiments, the cells are from livestock, poultry, game, or aquatic species. In other embodiments, the cells are from humans, primates (e.g. monkeys), rodents, including rats and mice, and companion animals such as dogs, cats, horses, and the like.
In some embodiments, the cells are self-renewing stem cell lines.
In some embodiments, the cells are satellite cells, myoblasts, myocytes, fibroblasts, induced pluripotent stem cells, hepatocytes, vascular endothelial cells, pericytes, embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, extraembryonic cell lines, somatic cell lines, adipocytes, embryonic stem cells or chondrocytes.
In some embodiments, the cells are myogenic cells. In some embodiments, the myogenic cells are natively myogenic (e.g. are myogenic cells that are cultured in the cultivation infrastructure). Natively myogenic cells include, but are not limited to, myoblasts, myocytes, satellite cells, side population cells, muscle derived stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, myogenic pericytes, or mesoangioblasts. In other embodiments, the myogenic cells are not natively myogenic (e.g. are non-myogenic cells that are specified to become myogenic cells in the cultivation infrastructure). In some embodiments, non-myogenic cells include embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, extraembryonic cell lines, and somatic cells other than muscle cells.
In some embodiments, non-myogenic cells are modified to become myogenic cells through the expression of one or more myogenic transcription factors. In exemplary embodiments, the myogenic transcription factor is MYOD1, MYOG, MYF5, MYF6, PAX3, PAX7, paralogs, orthologs, or genetic variants thereof.
In some embodiments, cells are modified to extend their renewal capacity through inactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CM) proteins and/or activation of Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). Accordingly, in some embodiments, cells used in the methods of the present disclosure comprise a polynucleotide sequence expressing TERT. In some embodiments, cells used in the methods of the present disclosure comprise one or more loss-of-function mutations in the endogenous genes encoding CM proteins. In some embodiments, cells comprise loss-of-function mutations in CM proteins p15, p16, paralogs, orthologs, or genetic variants thereof. In some embodiments, cells used in the methods of the present disclosure comprise a polynucleotide sequence expressing TERT and one or more loss-of-function mutations in the endogenous genes encoding CM proteins. The loss-of-function mutation may partially or completely inhibit the activity of CM proteins.
In some embodiments, the process of extending the renewal capacity of the cells comprises activating Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activity in the cells and/or inactivating CM proteins.
In some embodiments, the process of extending the renewal capacity of the cells comprises ectopic expression of TERT. In some embodiments, the process of extending the renewal capacity of the cells comprises introducing targeted mutations in the TERT promoter. In some embodiments, the process of extending the renewal capacity of the cells comprises activating endogenous TERT expression by an engineered transcriptional activator. In some embodiments, the process of extending the renewal capacity of the cells comprises transient transfection of TERT mRNA. In some embodiments, induction of endogenous pluripotency-associated telomerase activity in stem cells such as ESC and iPSC supports extended and indefinite cell renewal. In some embodiments, maintenance endogenous pluripotency-associated telomerase activity in stem cells such as ESC and iPSC supports extended and indefinite cell renewal.
In some embodiments, the process of extending the renewal capacity of the cells comprises inactivating one or more CM proteins. In some embodiments, inactivating CM proteins comprises introducing loss-of-function mutations in one or more genes encoding CM proteins. In some embodiments, the loss-of-function mutation partially inhibits the activity of one or more CM proteins. In some embodiments, the loss-of-function mutation completely inhibits the activity of one or more CM proteins.
In some embodiments, the inactivation of CM proteins and/or activation of TERT in the cells extend their renewal capacity for at least 25 population-doublings, at least 50 population-doublings, at least 60 population-doublings, at least 70 population-doublings, at least 80 population-doublings, at least 90 population-doublings, at least 100 population-doublings, at least 110 population-doublings, at least 120 population-doublings, at least 130 population-doublings, at least 140 population-doublings, at least 150 population-doublings, at least 160 population-doublings, at least 170 population-doublings, at least 180 population-doublings, at least 190 population-doublings, or at least 200 population-doublings. In some exemplary embodiments, the cells are primary myoblasts of a livestock, game, aquatic, or poultry species, whose renewal capacity is further extended.
In some embodiments, the cells are modified to inhibit HIPPO signaling, for example, by activating Yes-Associated Protein 1 (YAP1), Transcriptional co-Activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), or a combination thereof in the cells.
In some embodiments, the cells are somatic cells. In some embodiments, the cells are not somatic cells.
In some embodiments, the cells are anchorage-dependent cells and are cultivated in on a substrate. In some embodiments, the cells are anchorage independent cells and are cultivated in a suspension culture. In some embodiments, the cells are cultivated in a suspension culture and form a self-adherent aggregate.
It is noted that the cells can be cultivated for any downstream application, not just limited to food production.
Cellular Modifications
Provided herein are compositions and methods to modify any one of the cells provided herein with a gene of interest in order to increase cell density of metazoan cells in a culture medium, decrease waste products, such as ammonia or ammonium hydroxide, decrease dependency on exogenous addition of factors such as glutamine, albumin, and IGF to the media and to provide a cultured edible product.
Glutamine Synthetase (GS)
Provided herein are cells that overexpress a GS protein.
Provided herein is a method of increasing the production of glutamine in cells or by cells, increasing glutamine secretion into culture medium, and/or decreasing the concentration of extracellular ammonia (to be used interchangeably with ammonium hydroxide where ammonium hydroxide is the form of ammonia present in an aqueous solution) in the medium of cells in culture, comprising increasing the expression of a glutamine synthetase (GS) protein in cells. Also provided herein is a method of increasing the cell density of metazoan cell in culture, comprising increasing the expression of GS in the cells in combination with other modifications described herein and culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure. Also provided is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product comprising increasing the expression of GS in the cells in combination with other modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, the cells are modified to overexpress a gene encoding a GS protein. In some embodiments, cells ectopically express a GS gene. In some embodiments, the cells are genetically modified and carry stable integrations of one or more copies of a GS gene. In some embodiments, the cells overexpress the gene encoding the GS protein at levels sufficient to decrease the ammonia production, increase the production of glutamine, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, methods described herein to overexpress GS comprise introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence from Table 1B comprising a GS gene.
Increase of GS expression may be achieved using different approaches. In some embodiments, the expression is inducible. In some embodiments, the method comprises expressing nucleotides that encode the GS gene. In some embodiments, the nucleotides are ectopically expressed from constructs that are introduced into the cells, for example expressed from a plasmid, or other expression vector. In some embodiments, the constructs are integrated into the cell's genome, and the expression is driven in that manner (e.g. homologous recombination, introduction mediated by CRISPR-based technology). In some embodiments, expression of the GS gene involves electroporating a DNA, delivering a DNA complexed with a transfection vehicle, using a viral vector (e.g. retrovirus, lentivirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus), and the like, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the expression is constitutive. In some embodiments, the expression is conditional, e.g. inducible, e.g. under the control of an inducible promoter, e.g. an inducible Tet construct. In some embodiments, the expression of GS is constitutive, but the expression of additional genes of interest is inducible. In some embodiments, the expression of GS is inducible, but the expression of additional genes of interest is constitutive.
In the methods described herein, a polynucleotide sequence encoding the GS gene may encode any homolog of GS, including GS paralogs, or a GS protein translated from any splice variants of a GS gene, or may comprise any mutations in the GS gene sequence including, but not limited to nucleotide deletions, truncations, fusions, or substitutions. Mutations may be synthetic or naturally occurring.
The GS gene can be from of any organism. The GS gene can be from bacteria, plants, fungi, and archaea. The GS gene can be from any animal, such as vertebrate and invertebrate animal species. The GS gene can be from any vertebrate animal species such as mammals, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and the like. The GS gene can be from any mammalian species such as a human, murine, bovine, porcine, and the like.
In some embodiments, the cells are of a livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In an exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts are extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to stably overexpress GS. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts are extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to transiently overexpress GS. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts are extended and are engineered to ectopically overexpress GS.
In some embodiments, the synthesis of glutamine by the cells is increased by at least 2.5%, by at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 100%, at least 110%, at least 120%, at least 130%, at least 140%, at least 150%, at least 160%, at least 170%, at least 180%, at least 190%, at least 200%, at least 225%, at least 250%, at least 275%, at least 300%, at least 325%, at least 350%, at least 375% at least 400%, at least, 425%, at least 450%, at least 475%, at least 500%, at least 550%, at least 600%, at least 650%, at least 700%, at least 750%, at least 800%, at least 850%, at least 900%, at least 950% at least 1,000%, at least 1,100%, at least 1,200%, at least 1,300%, at least 1,400%, at least 1,500%, at least 1,600%, at least 1,700%, at least 1,800%, at least 1,900%, at least 2,000%, at least 2,250%, at least 2,500%, at least 2,750%, at least 3,000%, at least 3,500%, at least 4,000%, at least 4,500%, at least 5,000%, at least 6,000%, at least 7,000%, at least 8,000%, at least 9,000%, or even by at least 10,000%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cultures of cells in which glutamine synthesis is not increased by expression of GS as described herein.
In some embodiments, increased expression of GS using the methods described herein increases the concentration of glutamine in the culture medium to at least 0.001 mM, to at least 0.0025 mM, to at least 0.005 mM, to at least 0.0075 mM, to at least 0.01 mM, to at least 0.025 mM, to at least 0.05 mM, to at least 0.075 mM, to at least 0.1 mM, at least 0.25 mM, to at least 0.50 mM, to at least 0.75 mM, to at least 1.0 mM, to at least 1.5 mM, to at least 2.0 mM, to at least 3.0 mM, to at least 5.0 mM, to at least 10 mM, or even to at least 20 mM, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cultures of cells in which the expression of GS is not increased.
Methods to measure the increase in the concentration of intracellular glutamine production include, but are not limited to assessment of the glutamine concentration in lysates of cell biomass or the ambient culture medium by HPLC (Chorili et. al., 2012. Validation of a HPLC Method for Determination of Glutamine in Food Additives Using Post-Column Derivatization, AJAC Vol. 3 No. 2) commercially available kits for absolute glutamine determination kits (Sigma-Aldrich #GLN1 and #GLN2), and trace-labeled (H3 radiolabeled) glutamine monitoring.
In some embodiments, the protein synthesis in the cells is increased by at least 2.5%, by at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or even by at least 95%.
In some embodiments, the concentration of ammonia is decreased by at least 2.5%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or even at least 95%. Methods to measure the decrease of extracellular ammonia concentrations in the cell media include, but are not limited to commercially available absolute ammonia detection kits such as (Sigma-Aldrich #AA0100), diffuse reflectance-based fiberoptic ammonia sensors (Non-enzymatic reversible colorimetric method such as diffuse reflectance-based fiberoptics (Spear, S. K., Rhiel, M., Murhammer, D. W. et al. Appl Biochem Biotechnol (1998) 75: 175), and use of a biochemistry analyzer (e.g. YSI Biochemistry Analyzer 2700).
In some embodiments, there is a delay in time for the cells to reach the ammonia concentration of otherwise not manipulated cultures (the wild-type cell ammonia concentration). For example, cells overexpressing GS may demonstrate at least a 1.5-fold, 2-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 6-fold, 7-fold, 8-fold, 9-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, 30-fold, 40-fold, or even at least a 50-fold delay in time to achieve the wild type cell ammonia concentration.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, comprising increasing the expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) protein by the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. The culture density of cells may reach about 105 cells/mL, about 106 cells/mL, about 107 cells/mL, about 108 cells/mL, about 109 cells/mL, or about 1010 cells/mL (cells in the cellular biomass/mL of cultivation infrastructure), including values and ranges therebetween.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of decreasing cell death comprising increasing the expression of glutamine synthetase in the cells. In some embodiments, the decrease in cell death is about 2.5%, about 5%, about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 100%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the methods where the expression of GS is not increased.
Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)
Provided herein are cells that overexpress an IGF protein.
Provided herein is a method of increasing the production and secretion of IGF by cells comprising increasing the expression of an IGF protein in cells. Also provided herein is a method of increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells comprising increasing the expression of IGF in the cells in combination with other modifications described herein and culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure. Also provided is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product comprising increasing the expression of GS in the cells in combination with other modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, the cells are modified to overexpress the gene encoding an IGF protein. In some embodiments, cells ectopically express the IGF gene. In some embodiments, the cells are genetically modified and carry stable integrations of one or more copies of an IGF gene. In some embodiments, the cells overexpress the gene encoding the IGF protein at levels sufficient to increase production and/or secretion of IGF into the cell medium. The IGF gene can be of any metazoan species.
Increase of IGF expression may be achieved using different approaches. In some embodiments, the expression is inducible. In some embodiments, the method comprises expressing nucleotides that encode the IGF gene. In some embodiments, the nucleotides are ectopically expressed from constructs that are introduced into the cells, for example expressed from a plasmid, or other expression vector. In some embodiments, the constructs are integrated into the cell's genome, and the expression is driven in that manner (e.g. homologous recombination, introduction mediated by CRISPR-based technology). In some embodiments the expression of the IGF gene involves electroporating a DNA, delivering a DNA complexed with a transfection vehicle, using a viral vector (e.g. retrovirus, lentivirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus), and the like, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the expression is constitutive. In some embodiments, the expression is conditional, e.g. inducible, e.g. under the control of an inducible promoter, e.g. an inducible Tet construct. In some embodiments, the expression of IGF is constitutive, but the expression of additional genes of interest is inducible. In some embodiments, the expression of IGF is inducible, but the expression of additional genes of interest is constitutive.
The IGF gene can be from any animal, such as vertebrate and invertebrate animal species. The IGF gene can be from any vertebrate animal species such as mammals, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and the like. The IGF gene can be from any mammalian species such as a human, murine, bovine, porcine, poultry, and the like.
In the methods described herein, a polynucleotide sequence encoding the IGF gene may encode any homolog of IGF, including IGF paralogs, such as IGF-1, IGF-2 or any other IGF paralogs, or an IGF protein translated from any splice variants of an IGF gene, or may comprise any mutations in the IGF gene sequence including, but not limited to nucleotide deletions, truncations, fusions, or substitutions. Mutations may be synthetic or naturally occurring. In one embodiment, the methods described herein comprise introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence encoding IGF-1. In another embodiment, the methods described herein comprise introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence encoding IGF-2. In some embodiments, methods described herein to overexpress IGF comprise introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence from Table 1B comprising an IGF gene.
In some embodiments, the cells are of a livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In an exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to stably overexpress IGF. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to transiently overexpress IGF. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to ectopically overexpress IGF.
In some embodiments, the concentration of IGF in the cell culture medium is increased by at least 0.001%, 0.005%, 0.01%, at least 0.02%, at least 0.03%, at least 0.04%, at least 0.05%, at least 0.075%, at least 0.1%, at least 0.5%, at least 0.75%, at least 1%, at least 1.25%, at least 1.5%, at least 1.75%, at least 2%, at least 2.5%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 100%, at least 110%, at least 120%, at least 130%, at least 140%, at least 150%, at least 160%, at least 170%, at least 180%, at least 190%, at least 200%, at least 225%, at least 250%, at least 275%, at least 300%, at least 325%, at least 350%, at least 375% at least 400%, at least, 425%, at least 450%, at least 475%, at least 500%, at least 550%, at least 600%, at least 650%, at least 700%, at least 750%, at least 800%, at least 850%, at least 900%, at least 950% at least 1,000%, at least 1,100%, at least 1,200%, at least 1,300%, at least 1,400%, at least 1,500%, at least 1,600%, at least 1,700%, at least 1,800%, at least 1,900%, at least 2,000%, at least 2,250%, at least 2,500%, at least 2,750%, at least 3,000%, at least 3,500%, at least 4,000%, at least 4,500%, at least 5,000%, at least 6,000%, at least 7,000%, at least 8,000%, at least 9,000%, or even by at least 10,000% including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cultures of cells in which the expression of IGF is not increased as described herein.
In some embodiments, increased expression of IGF using the methods described herein increases the concentration of IGF in the culture medium by at least 0.00001 ng/mL, to at least 0.000025 ng/mL, to at least 0.000075 ng/mL, to at least 0.0005 ng/mL, to at least 0.001 ng/mL, to at least 0.0025 ng/mL, to at least 0.005 ng/mL, to at least 0.0075 ng/mL, to at least 0.01 ng/mL, to at least 0.025 ng/mL, to at least 0.05 ng/mL, to at least 0.1 ng/mL, to at least 0.25 ng/mL, to at least 0.5 ng/mL, to at least 1 ng/mL, to at least 2.5 ng/mL, to at least 5 ng/mL, to at least 7.5 ng/mL, to at least 10 ng/mL, to at least 25 ng/mL, to at least 50 ng/mL, to at least 75 ng/mL, to at least 125 ng/mL, to at least 250 ng/mL, to at least 500 ng/mL, to at least 750 ng/mL, to at least 1,000 ng/mL, to at least 1,500 ng/mL, to at least 2,000 ng/mL, to at least 2,500 ng/mL, to at least 3,000 ng/mL, to at least 3,500 ng/mL, to at least 4,000 ng/mL, to at least 4,500 ng/mL, to at least 5,000 ng/mL to at least 6,000 ng/mL, to at least 7,000 ng/mL, to at least 8,000 ng/mL, to at least 9,000 ng/mL, or even to at least 10,000 ng/mL including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cultures of cells in which the expression of IGF is not increased as described herein.
Methods to measure the increase in the concentration of IGF include, but are not limited to, antibody-based methods such as immunoprecipitation, co-immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and amino-acid based tagging, isolation, and separation (e.g., FLAG, GST, GFP, etc.).
In some embodiments, the rate of synthesis of IGF by cells is increased by about 0.000001 μg/106 cells/day, by about 0.00001 μg/106 cells/day, by about 0.0001 μg/106 cells/day, 0.001 μg/106 cells/day, by about 0.01 μg/106 cells/day, by about 0.1 μg/106 cells/day, by about 1.0 μg/106 cells/day, by about 10 μg/106 cells/day, by about 100 μg/106 cells/day, by about 10 μg/106 cells/day, by about 100 μg/106 cells/day, by about 1,000 μg/106 cells/day, or by even about 10,000 μg/106 cells/day, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cells wherein the rate of IGF synthesis is not increased as described herein.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing the proliferation rate of cells comprising increasing the expression of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) protein by the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In some embodiments, the population doubling time of the cells is decreased by about by about 5%, by about 10%, by about 15%, by about 20%, by about 25%, by about 30%, by about 35%, by about 40%, by about 45%, by about 50%, by about 55%, by about 60%, by about 65%, by about 70%, by about 75%, by about 80%, by about 85%, by about 90%, by about 95%, or by more than 95%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cells wherein the expression of IGF is not increased.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing protein production in the cells comprising increasing the expression of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) protein by the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In some embodiments, the protein produced by the cells in culture is measured as total cell protein per cell nucleus. In some embodiments, the total cell protein per nucleus is increased by about 5%, by about 10%, by about 15%, by about 20%, by about 25%, by about 30%, by about 35%, by about 40%, by about 45%, by about 50%, by about 55%, by about 60%, by about 65%, by about 70%, by about 75%, by about 80%, by about 85%, by about 90%, by about 95%, by about 100%, by about 110%, by about 120%, by about 130%, by about 140%, by about 150%, by about 160%, by about 170%, by about 180%, by about 190%, by about 200%, by about 225%, by about 250%, by about 275%, by about 300%, by about 350%, by about 400%, by about 450%, by about 500%, by about 550%, by about 600%, by about 650%, by about 700%, by about 750%, by about 800%, by about 850%, by about 900%, by about 950%, by about 1,000%, by about 1,100%, by about 1,200%, by about 1,300%, by about 1,400%, by about 1,500%, by about 1,600%, by about, 1,700%, by about 1,800%, by about 1,900%, by about 2,000%, by about 2,100%, by about 2,200%, by about 2,300%, by about 2,400%, by about 2,500%, by more than 2,500%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the total cell protein production where the expression of IGF is not increased.
In some embodiments, the total cell protein per nucleus is increased by about 5 pg/nucleus; by about 10 pg/nucleus; by about 15 pg/nucleus; by about 20 pg/nucleus; by about 25 pg/nucleus; by about 30 pg/nucleus; by about 35 pg/nucleus; by about 40 pg/nucleus; by about 45 pg/nucleus, by about 50 pg/nucleus; by about 55 pg/nucleus, by about 60 pg/nucleus, by about 65 pg/nucleus, by about 70 pg/nucleus, by about 75 pg/nucleus, by about 80 pg/nucleus, by about 85 pg/nucleus, by about 90 pg/nucleus, by about 95 pg/nucleus, by about 100 pg/nucleus, by about 110 pg/nucleus, by about 120 pg/nucleus, by about 130 pg/nucleus, by about 140 pg/nucleus, by about by about 150 pg/nucleus, by about, by about 160 pg/nucleus, by about 170 pg/nucleus, by about 180 pg/nucleus, by about 190 pg/nucleus, by about 200 pg/nucleus, by about 225 pg/nucleus, by about 250 pg/nucleus, by about 275 pg/nucleus, by about 280 pg/nucleus, by about 290 pg/nucleus, by about 300 pg/nucleus, by about 350 pg/nucleus, by about 400 pg/nucleus, by about 450 pg/nucleus, by about 500 pg/nucleus, by about 550 pg/nucleus, by about 600 pg/nucleus, by about 650 pg/nucleus, by about 700 pg/nucleus, by about 750 pg/nucleus, by about 800 pg/nucleus, by about 850 pg/nucleus, by about 900 pg/nucleus, by by about 950 pg/nucleus, by about 1000 pg/nucleus, by about 1,100 pg/nucleus, by about 1,200 pg/nucleus, by about 1,300 pg/nucleus, by about 1,400 pg/nucleus, by about 1,500 pg/nucleus, by about 1,600 pg/nucleus, by about 1,700 pg/nucleus, by about 1,800 pg/nucleus, by about 1,900 pg/nucleus, by about 2,000 pg/nucleus, by about 2,100 pg/nucleus, by about 2,200 pg/nucleus, by about 2,300 pg/nucleus, by about 2,400 pg/nucleus, by about 2,500 pg/nucleus, by more than 2,500 pg/nucleus, including values and ranges therebetween.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the rate of proliferation of cells in a cultivation infrastructure, comprising increasing the expression of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) protein in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In some embodiments, increasing the expression of IGF comprises introducing a polynucleotide sequence encoding IGF into the cells. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide sequence encodes IGF1. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide sequence encodes IGF2. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide sequence comprises an IGF coding sequence from Tables 1A and 1B.
Albumin
Provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein.
Provided herein is a method of increasing the production and secretion of albumin by cells comprising increasing the expression of an albumin protein in the cells. Also provided herein is a method of increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, comprising increasing the expression of albumin in the cells in combination with other modifications described herein and culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure. Also provided is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product comprising increasing the expression of albumin in the cells in combination with other modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, the cells are modified to overexpress the gene encoding albumin. In some embodiments, cells ectopically express the albumin gene. In some embodiments, the cells are genetically modified and carry stable integrations of one or more copies of the albumin gene. In some embodiments, the cells overexpress the gene encoding the albumin protein at levels sufficient to increase production and/or secretion of albumin into the cell culture medium.
Increase of albumin expression may be achieved using different approaches. In some embodiments, the expression is inducible. In some embodiments, the method comprises expressing nucleotides that encode the albumin gene. In some embodiments, the nucleotides are ectopically expressed from constructs that are introduced into the cells, for example expressed from a plasmid, or other expression vector. In some embodiments, the constructs are integrated into the cell's genome, and the expression is driven in that manner (e.g. homologous recombination, introduction mediated by CRISPR-based technology). In some embodiments, expression of the albumin gene involves electroporating a DNA, delivering a DNA complexed with a transfection vehicle, using a viral vector (e.g. retrovirus, lentivirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus), and the like, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the expression is constitutive. In some embodiments, the expression is conditional, e.g. inducible, e.g. under the control of an inducible promoter, e.g. an inducible Tet construct. In some embodiments, the expression of albumin is constitutive, but the expression of additional genes of interest is inducible. In some embodiments, the expression of albumin is inducible, but the expression of additional genes of interest is constitutive.
The albumin gene can be from any animal, such as vertebrate and invertebrate animal species. In some embodiments, the albumin gene can be from any vertebrate animal species such as mammals, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and the like. In some embodiments, the albumin gene can be from any mammalian species, such as a human, murine, bovine, porcine, livestock, and the like.
In the methods described herein, a polynucleotide sequence encoding the albumin gene may encode any homolog of albumin, including any albumin paralogs, or an albumin protein translated from any splice variants of an albumin gene, or may comprise any mutations in the albumin gene sequence including, but not limited to nucleotide deletions, truncations, fusions, or substitutions. Mutations may be synthetic or naturally occurring. In some embodiments, methods described herein to overexpress albumin comprise introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence from Table 1B comprising an albumin gene.
In some embodiments, the cells are of a livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In an exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to stably overexpress albumin. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to transiently overexpress albumin. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to ectopically overexpress albumin.
In some embodiments, an increased expression of albumin using the methods described herein increases the concentration of albumin in the culture medium by at least 0.001%, 0.005%, 0.01%, at least 0.02%, at least 0.03%, at least 0.04%, at least 0.05%, at least 0.075%, at least 0.1%, at least 0.5%, at least 0.75%, at least 1%, at least 1.25%, at least 1.5%, at least 1.75%, at least 2%, at least 2.5%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 100%, at least 110%, at least 120%, at least 130%, at least 140%, at least 150%, at least 160%, at least 170%, at least 180%, at least 190%, at least 200%, at least 225%, at least 250%, at least 275%, at least 300%, at least 325%, at least 350%, at least 375% at least 400%, at least, 425%, at least 450%, at least 475%, at least 500%, at least 550%, at least 600%, at least 650%, at least 700%, at least 750%, at least 800%, at least 850%, at least 900%, at least 950% at least 1,000%, at least 1,100%, at least 1,200%, at least 1,300%, at least 1,400%, at least 1,500%, at least 1,600%, at least 1,700%, at least 1,800%, at least 1,900%, at least 2,000%, at least 2,250%, at least 2,500%, at least 2,750%, at least 3,000%, at least 3,500%, at least 4,000%, at least 4,500%, at least 5,000%, at least 6,000%, at least 7,000%, at least 8,000%, at least 9,000%, or even by at least 10,000% including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cultures of cells in which the albumin expression is not increased as described herein.
In some embodiments, an increased expression of albumin using the methods described herein increases the concentration of albumin in the culture medium to at least 0.0001 mg/mL, to at least 0.0002 mg/mL, to at least 0.0004 mg/mL, to at least 0.0005 mg/mL, to at least 0.0006 mg/mL, to at least 0.0007 mg/mL, to at least 0.0008 mg/mL, to at least 0.0009 mg/mL, to at least 0.001 mg/mL, to at least 0.002 mg/mL, to at least 0.003 mg/mL, to at least 0.004 mg/mL, to at least 0.005 mg/mL, to at least 0.006 mg/mL, to at least 0.007 mg/mL, to at least 0.008 mg/mL, to at least 0.009 mg/mL, to at least 0.01 mg/mL, to at least 0.05 mg/mL, to at least 0.075 mg/mL, to at least 0.1 mg/mL, to at least 0.25 mg/mL, to at least 0.5 mg/mL, to at least 0.75 mg/mL, to at least 1 mg/mL, to at least 1.25 mg/mL, to at least 1.5 mg/mL, to at least 1.75 mg/mL, to at least 2 mg/mL, to at least 3 mg/mL, to at least 5 mg/mL, to at least 10 mg/mL, to at least 20 mg/mL, to at least 25 mg/mL, to at least 50 mg/mL, to at least 75 mg/mL, or even to at least 100 mg/mL, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cultures of cells in which the albumin expression is not increased as described herein.
Methods to measure the increase in the concentration of albumin include commercial kits, such as the BCG Albumin Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich #MAK124), BCP Albumin Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich #MAK125), and antibody-based methods, such as immunoprecipitation, co-immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and amino-acid based tagging, isolation, and separation (e.g., FLAG, GST, GFP, etc.).
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing the rate of proliferation of cells in a cultivation infrastructure, comprising increasing the expression of albumin in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In some embodiments, the population doubling time of the cells is decreased by about 10%, by about 15%, by about 20%, by about 25%, by about 30%, by about 35%, by about 40%, by about 45%, by about 50%, by about 55%, by about 60%, by about 65%, by about 70%, by about 75%, by about 80%, by about 85%, by about 90%, by about 95%, by more than 95%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to cells in which the expression of albumin is not increased.
In one embodiment, provided herein is a method of decreasing cell death comprising increasing the expression of albumin in the cells. In some embodiments, the decrease in cell death provided is about 2.5%, about 5%, about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, or about 100%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the methods wherein the expression of albumin is not increased.
In some embodiments, provided herein are cells that overexpress any combination of GS, IGF, and albumin. For example, in one embodiment, provided herein are cells that overexpress a GS protein and an IGF protein. In one embodiment, provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein and a GS protein. In one embodiment, provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein and an IGF protein. In one embodiment, provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein, a GS protein, and an IGF protein.
TERT and CKI Proteins
Provided herein are cells whose renewal capacity is extended, for e.g., by overexpressing a TERT protein and/or by inhibiting the activity of CM proteins. Exemplary methods to overexpress TERT and inhibit the activity of CM proteins are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/278,869, filed on Jan. 14, 2016, and 62/361,867, filed on Jul. 13, 2016, and a PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/013782, filed on Jan. 17, 2017, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the density of cells in a culture or an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product comprising increasing the expression of a TERT protein in the cells in combination with increasing the expression of GS, IGF, albumin, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the density of cells in a culture or an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product comprising inhibiting the activity of CM proteins in the cells in combination with increasing the expression of GS, IGF, albumin, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the density of cells in a culture or an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product comprising increasing the expression of a TERT protein in the cells, inhibiting the activity of CM proteins in the cells, and increasing the expression of GS, IGF, albumin, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the cells are modified to overexpress a polynucleotide sequence encoding TERT. In some embodiments, cells ectopically express the TERT polynucleotide. In some embodiments, the cells are genetically modified and carry stable integrations of one or more copies of the TERT polynucleotide.
Increased expression of TERT may be achieved using different approaches. In some embodiments, increased expression of TERT may be achieved by ectopically expressing TERT. In some embodiments, increased expression of TERT may be achieved by introducing targeted mutations in the TERT promoter. In some embodiments, increased expression of TERT may be achieved by activating endogenous TERT expression by an engineered transcriptional activator. In some embodiments, increased expression of TERT may be achieved by transiently transfecting TERT mRNA.
In some embodiments, the expression of TERT is inducible. In some embodiments, the method comprises expressing nucleotides that encode the TERT protein. In some embodiments, the nucleotides are ectopically expressed from constructs that are introduced into the cells, for example expressed from a plasmid, or other expression vector. In some embodiments, the constructs are integrated into the cell's genome, and the expression is driven in that manner (e.g. homologous recombination, introduction mediated by CRISPR-based technology). In some embodiments, the expression of the TERT gene involves electroporating a DNA, delivering a DNA complexed with a transfection vehicle, using a viral vector (e.g. retrovirus, lentivirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus), and the like, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the expression is constitutive. In some embodiments, the expression is conditional, e.g. inducible, e.g. under the control of an inducible promoter, e.g. an inducible Tet construct. In some embodiments, the expression of TERT is constitutive, but the expression of additional genes of interest is inducible. In some embodiments, the expression of TERT is inducible, but the expression of additional genes of interest is constitutive.
The polynucleotide encoding TERT can be from of any organism. The TERT polynucleotide can be from bacteria, plants, fungi, and archaea. The TERT polynucleotide can be from any animal, such as vertebrate and invertebrate animal species. The TERT polynucleotide can be from any vertebrate animal species such as mammals, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and the like. The TERT polynucleotide can be from any mammalian species, such as a human, murine, bovine, porcine, and the like.
In some embodiments, the methods of inhibiting CM proteins comprise introducing loss-of-function mutations, e.g., INDEL (insertion or deletion) mutations, into one or more genes encoding CM proteins in the cells. This can be accomplished using any gene based technologies, for example, using CRISPR-Cas (Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeats) based technology or TALEN based technology. In an exemplary embodiment, the genes encoding CM proteins are the genes encoding CM proteins p15, p16, paralogs, orthologs, or genetic variants thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, the methods of inhibiting CM proteins comprise introducing loss-of-function mutations in CDKN2B gene (p15) and/or in CDKN2A gene (p16).
In some embodiments, inhibiting the activity of CM proteins comprises activating a CDK4 protein, paralogs, orthologs or genetic variants thereof.
In some embodiments, the methods of inhibiting the CM function comprise introducing into the cells a vector expressing a polynucleotide that encodes a dominant negative mutant of one or more CM proteins. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide is ectopically expressed from a construct that is introduced into the cells of the biomass, for example expressed from a plasmid, or other vector. In some embodiments, the construct is integrated into the cell's genome, and the expression is driven in that manner (e.g. introduction mediated by CRISPR-based technology). In some embodiments, the expression of the polynucleotide involves electroporating a DNA, delivering a DNA complexed with a transfection vehicle, using a viral vector (e.g. retrovirus, lentivirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus), and the like, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the expression is constitutive. In some embodiments, the expression is conditional, e.g. inducible, e.g. under the control of an inducible promoter, e.g. an inducible Tet construct.
In some embodiments, the methods of inhibiting comprise delivering dominant negative mutants of one or more CM proteins directly, e.g. purified proteins, synthetic proteins, or recombinantly expressed proteins, or combinations thereof, to the cells.
In some embodiments, the methods of inhibiting comprise transcriptional repression of the endogenous genes encoding one or more CM proteins in the cells. This can be accomplished, for example, by using nucleic acid sequence-directed transcriptional repressors. For example, an endonuclease-defective Cas9, dCas9, can be combined with a guide RNA that targets the promoter region of the genes encoding one or more CM proteins and reduces the transcriptional activation and concomitant gene expression.
In some embodiments, the cells are of a livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species. In an exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to stably overexpress GS, IGF, albumin, or any combination thereof. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to transiently overexpress GS, IGF, albumin, or any combination thereof. In another exemplary embodiment, the renewal capacity of the primary duck myoblasts is extended, and the myoblasts are engineered to ectopically overexpress GS, IGF, albumin, or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments, provided herein are cells that overexpress a GS protein and an IGF protein. The cells may optionally be modified to extend renewal capacity, and may comprise activated TERT and/or inactivated CM protein, may comprise an antagonized HIPPO signaling pathway, e.g., activated YAP/TAZ, may be further differentiated, and the like.
In some embodiments, provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein and a GS protein. The cells may optionally be modified to extend renewal capacity, and may comprise activated TERT and/or inactivated CM protein, may comprise an antagonized HIPPO signaling pathway, e.g., activated YAP/TAZ, may be further differentiated, and the like.
In some embodiments, provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein and an IGF protein. The cells may optionally be modified to extend renewal capacity, and may comprise activated TERT and/or inactivated CM protein, may comprise an antagonized HIPPO signaling pathway, e.g., activated YAP/TAZ, may be further differentiated, and the like.
In some embodiments, provided herein are cells that overexpress an albumin protein, a GS protein, and an IGF protein. The cells may optionally be modified to extend renewal capacity, and may comprise activated TERT and/or inactivated CM protein, may comprise an antagonized HIPPO signaling pathway, e.g., activated YAP/TAZ, may be further differentiated, and the like.
Tables 1A and 1B show exemplary sequences used for ectopic overexpression in some exemplary embodiments provided herein. The cells may optionally be modified to extend renewal capacity, and may comprise activated TERT and/or inactivated CM protein, may comprise an antagonized HIPPO signaling, e.g., activated YAP/TAZ, may be further differentiated, and the like.
Table 1C shows exemplary amino acid sequences for GS, albumin, and IGF proteins that may be expressed in cells according to the methods described here.
Taurus]
rerio]
mykiss]
niloticus]
mykiss]
tropicalis]
tropicalis]
tropicalis]
tropicalis]
gallus]
gallus]
taurus]
scrofa]
rerio]
niloticus]
mykiss]
tropicalis]
gallus]
gallopavo]
platyrhynchos]
Taurus]
mykiss]
niloticus]
mykiss]
tropicalis]
tropicalis]
tropicalis]
tropicalis]
gallus]
gallus]
gallus]
gallus]
Provided herein are expression vectors comprising any one of the sequences selected from Tables 1A and 1B, and cells comprising any one of such expression vectors, for example a cell is from a livestock, poultry, game, or aquatic species.
Exemplary Methods and Compositions
Provided herein are methods of increasing the efficiency of maintaining cells in culture.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of decreasing the concentration of ammonia in the culture medium of cells comprising increasing the expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) protein in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of ammonia in the culture medium is decreased by at least 2.5%.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing the production of glutamine in cells comprising increasing the expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) protein in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of glutamine in the cells is increased by at least 2.5%.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing the concentration of Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in the medium of cells in culture comprising increasing the expression of IGF protein secreted by the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of IGF in the ambient medium, or within the cell, is increased by at least 2.5%.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method of increasing the concentration of albumin in the medium of cells in culture comprising increasing the expression of albumin in the cells, wherein the cells are of livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species, and wherein the concentration of albumin in the ambient medium, or within the cell, is increased by increased by at least 2.5%.
In some embodiments, provided herein are methods for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells comprising introducing any combination of the following cellular modifications: increased expression of GS, increased expression of IGF, increased expression of albumin, increased expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), loss-of-function mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CM) proteins, increased expression of YAP, increased expression of TAZ, increased expression of myogenic transcription factors.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, the method comprising (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and albumin; and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, the method comprising (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or combinations (GS+IGF; GS+albumin; IGF+albumin; GS+IGF+albumin) thereof; and (b) culturing the cells in a cultivation infrastructure.
In some embodiments, provided herein is a method for increasing the cell density of a culture comprising metazoan cells, the method comprising (a) introducing into the cells one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or combinations (GS+IGF; GS+albumin; IGF+albumin; GS+IGF+albumin) thereof; (b) introducing into the cells a polynucleotide sequence encoding a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT); and (c) culturing the cells expressing GS, IGF, albumin or combinations thereof and TERT in a cultivation infrastructure.
As provided herein, the density of cells in a culture or cultivation infrastructure is determined by calculating the cell number per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure, by determining the biomass per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure, by determining the biomass DNA content per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure, by determining the biomass RNA content per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure, by determining the biomass protein content per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure, or by visual, electronic, metabolic, spectroscopic, or microscopic, measurement of the biomass density.
In some embodiments, an increase in the cell density of a culture using the methods described herein is about 1.025 fold, 1.05 fold, 1.10-fold, 1.15-fold, 1.20-fold, 1.25-fold, 1.30 fold, 1.35-fold, 1.40-fold, 1.45-fold, 1.5-fold, 2-fold, 2.5-fold, 3-fold, 3.5-fold, 4-fold, 4.5-fold, 5-fold, 7.5-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, 30-fold, 40-fold, or even about 50-fold, 75-fold, 100-fold, 150-fold, or is even about 200-fold, compared to the density of a culture comprising cells that do not include one or more cellular modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, an increase in the density of cells in a culture using the methods described herein is at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 100%, at least 150%, at least 200%, at least 250%, at least 300%, at least 350%, at least 400%, at least 450%, at least 500%, at least 550%, at least 600%, at least 650%, at least 700%, at least 750%, at least 800%, at least 850%, at least 900%, at least 950%, at least 1000%, compared to the cell density of a culture comprising cells that do not include one or more cellular modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, using the methods described herein, there is an increased yield of cellular biomass harvestable per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure. In some embodiments, the increase is at least about 1.0-fold, 1.25-fold, 1.5-fold, 2-fold, 2.5-fold, 3-fold, 3.5-fold, 4-fold, 4.5-fold, 5-fold, 7.5-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, 30-fold, 40-fold, or even about 50-fold, 75-fold, 100-fold, 150-fold, or is even about 200-fold compared to the yield of cellular biomass harvestable per unit volume of the cultivation infrastructure in the absence of one or more cellular modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, methods described herein increase the density of cells in a culture by increasing the rate of proliferation of cells in the culture. In some embodiments, the increase in the rate of cell proliferation is at least 2.5%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 100%, at least 150%, at least 200%, at least 250%, at least 300%, at least 350%, at least 400%, at least 450%, at least 500%, at least 550%, at least 600%, at least 650%, at least 700%, at least 750%, at least 800%, at least 850%, at least 900%, at least 950%, or at least 1000%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the rate of proliferation of cells that do not include one or more cellular modifications described herein. In some embodiments, the increase in the rate of cell proliferation is about 25-1000%, about 25-750%, about 25-500%, about 50-1000%, about 50-750%, about 50-500%, about 100-1000%, about 100-750%, or about 100-500%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the rate of proliferation of cells that do not include one or more cellular modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, methods described herein increase the cell density of a culture by decreasing cell death within the cellular biomass. In some embodiments, the decrease in cell death is at least 2.5%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 100%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the rate of cell death in cells that do not include one or more cellular modifications described herein. In some embodiments, a decrease in the rate of cell death within the cellular biomass is about 2.5-10%, about 2.5-75%, about 2.5-50%, about 5.0-100%, about 5.0-75%, about 5.0-50%, about 10-100%, about 10-75%, or about 10-50%, including values and ranges therebetween, compared to the rate of cell death in cells that do not include one or more cellular modifications described herein.
In some embodiments, using the methods described herein, the density of cells in a culture may reach about 105 cells/mL, about 106 cells/mL, about 107 cells/mL, about 108 cells/mL, about 109 cells/mL, or about 1010 cells/mL (cells in the cellular biomass/mL of cultivation infrastructure), including values and ranges therebetween.
In some embodiments, using the methods described herein, the density of cells in a culture may reach about 1 g/L, 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 25 g/L, 50 g/L, 75 g/L, 100 g/L, 150 g/L, 200 g/L, 250 g/L, 300 g/L, 350 g/L, 400 g/L, 450 g/L, 500 g/L, 550 g/L, 600 g/L, 650 g/L, 700 g/L, 750 g/L, 800 g/L, 850 g/L, 900 g/L, or 1000 g/L (g of cellular biomass/L of cultivation infrastructure), including values and ranges therebetween. In some embodiments, the density of cells in a culture may range from about 1 g/L to about 5 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 750 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 500 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 250 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 100 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 50 g/L, about 5 g/L to about 1000 g/L, about 5 g/L to about 750 g/L, about 5 g/L to about 500 g/L, about 5 g/L to about 250 g/L, about 5 g/L to about 100 g/L, about 5 g/L to about 50 g/L, about 25 g/L to about 1000 g/L, about 25 g/L to about 750 g/L, about 25 g/L to about 500 g/L, about 25 g/L to about 300 g/L, about 25 g/L to about 250 g/L, about 25 g/L to about 100 g/L, about 50 g/L to about 1000 g/L, about 50 g/L to about 750 g/L, about 50 g/L to about 500 g/L, about 50 g/L to about 300 g/L, about 50 g/L to about 250 g/L, about 100 g/L to 1000 g/L, about 100 g/L to about 750 g/L, about 100 g/L to about 500 g/L, about 200 g/L to about 1000 g/L, about 200 g/L to about 750 g/L, about 200 g/L to about 500 g/L, about 300 g/L to about 1000 g/L, about 300 g/L to about 800 g/L, about 400 g/L to about 1000 g/L, or about 500 g/L to about 1000 g/L including values and ranges therebetween.
In some embodiments, provided herein is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product (e.g. cultured poultry, cultured livestock, cultured game, cultured fish), the method comprising: (a) introducing one or more polynucleotide sequences encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), albumin or combinations (GS+IGF; GS+albumin; IGF+albumin; GS+IGF+albumin) thereof into myogenic metazoan cells; (b) optionally introducing a polynucleotide sequence encoding a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) into the myogenic metazoan cells; (c) inducing myogenic differentiation of the cells, wherein the differentiated cells form myocytes and multinucleated myotubes; and (d) culturing the myocytes and myotubes to generate skeletal muscle fibers, thereby producing a cultured edible product. In one embodiment, myogenic cells are natively myogenic. In another embodiment, myogenic cells are not natively myogenic and are modified to become myogenic cells by expressing one or more myogenic transcription factors.
In some embodiments, provided herein is an in vitro method for producing a cultured edible product, the method comprising: (a) overexpressing GS, IGF, albumin, or a combination thereof in a self-renewing cell line, wherein the cell line is a myogenic transcription factor-modified cell line, and wherein the cell line is of a livestock, poultry, game or aquatic animal species; (b) inducing myogenic differentiation of the cell line, wherein the differentiated cell line forms myocytes and multinucleated myotubes; and (c) culturing the myocytes and myotubes to generate skeletal muscle fibers, thereby producing a cultured edible product. In some embodiments, provided herein is cultured edible product produced by the in vitro methods.
In the methods for producing a cultured edible product provided herein, myogenic differentiation can be induced in a variety of ways. In some embodiments, cellular biomass with increased cell density can be differentiated into a phenotype of interest by contacting the cells with a differentiation agent. For example, if the phenotype of interest for the expanded cellular biomass is skeletal muscle and the cellular biomass comprises non-myogenic cells (e.g., non-myogenic stem cells or fibroblasts), the expanded cellular biomass can be contacted with a differentiation agent that would induce the skeletal muscle phenotype into the cells of the biomass. Exemplary differentiation agents that may induce skeletal muscle phenotype include myogenic transcription factors such as MYOD1, MYOG, MYF5, MYF6, PAX3, PAX7, paralogs, orthologs, and genetic variants thereof. A PCT publication, WO/2015/066377, discloses exemplary methods for differentiating cells into a skeletal muscle phenotype and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the expanded cellular biomass may be differentiated into the skeletal muscle phenotype using the methods described in WO/2015/066377.
In some embodiments, cells of the expanded biomass can be differentiated into a phenotype of interest without a differentiation agent. For example, if the phenotype of interest for the expanded biomass is a skeletal muscle and the cellular biomass comprises cells of the skeletal muscle lineage, then these cells may differentiate into the skeletal muscle phenotype on their own without a need for an external differentiation agent. However, in some embodiments, an external differentiation agent such as one or more myogenic transcription factors can be used to differentiate cells of the skeletal muscle lineage into the skeletal muscle phenotype.
Induction of myogenic differentiation in cells overexpressing any one of the cellular modifications described herein would result in the formation of differentiated myocytes and multinucleated myotubes. These myocytes and myotubes are cultured to generate skeletal muscle fibers thereby producing a cultured edible biomass or a cultured edible product.
The cultured edible biomass/product can be processed as a raw, uncooked edible product (cultured meat) or as a cooked edible product or as a cooked/uncooked food ingredient. In some embodiments, processing comprises withdrawal of the culture medium that supports the viability, survival, growth, expansion and differentiation of the cellular biomass. Withdrawal may comprise physical removal of the culture medium or altering the composition of the culture medium, for example, by addition of components that would reduce or prevent further expansion and/or differentiation of the biomass or by depletion of components that support expansion and/or differentiation of the biomass.
In some embodiments, processing comprises exposing the cultured edible biomass to sub-physiological temperatures that would not support the expansion and/or differentiation of the biomass. Sub-physiological temperatures include a temperature of about 15° C. (about 59° F.) or lower, about 10° C. (about 50° F.) or lower, about 0° C. to about 15° C. (about 32° F. to about 59° F.), about 0° C. to −15° C. (about 32° F. to about 5° F.), about −15° C. to about 15° C. (about 5° F. to about 59° F.), about 0° C. to −213° C. (about 32° F. to about −350° F.), about −30° C. to about −100° C. (about −22° F. to about −148° F.), about −50° C. to about −90° C. (about −58° F. to about −130° F.), or about −170° C. to about −190° C. (about −274° F. to about −310° F.). For example, in one embodiment, the expanded and/or differentiated biomass can be cooled to a temperature of about 2° C. to about 8° C. (about 35° F. to about 46.5° F.). In another embodiment, the expanded and/or differentiated biomass can be frozen, for example, by cooling to a temperature of about 32° F. or lower, e.g. about 32° F. to about 0° F., about 32° F. to about −10° F., about 32° F. to about −20° F., about 32° F. to about −30° F., about 32° F. to about −40° F., about 32° F. to about −50° F., about 32° F. to about −60° F., about 32° F. to about −70° F., about 32° F. to about −80° F., and the like. In some embodiments, the expanded and/or differentiated biomass can be exposed to sub-physiological temperatures as low as about −300° F. to about −350° F., such as the liquid nitrogen temperature of about −321° F.
In some embodiments, processing comprises exposing the biomass to superphysological temperatures that would not support the viability, survival, expansion and/or differentiation of the biomass. In one embodiment, exposing the biomass to superphysiological temperatures comprises fully or partially cooking the biomass, for example, by heating the biomass to a temperature of about 100° F. to about 600° F., about 100° F. to about 550° F., about 100° F. to about 500° F., about 100° F. to about 450° F., about 100° F. to about 400° F., about 100° F. to about 350° F., about 100° F. to about 300° F., about 100° F. to about 250° F., about 100° F. to about 200° F. or about 100° F. to about 150° F.
In some embodiments, provided herein is an edible metazoan biomass product (cultured edible product) comprising cells having any combination of the following cellular modifications: increased expression of GS, increased expression of IGF, increased expression of albumin, increased expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), loss-of-function mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CM) proteins, increased expression of YAP, increased expression of TAZ, increased expression of myogenic transcription factors.
Cultivation Infrastructure
As referred to herein, a cultivation infrastructure refers to the environment in which metazoan cells are cultured, i.e. the environment in which the cellular biomass is cultivated.
A cultivation infrastructure may be a tube, a cylinder, a flask, a petri-dish, a multi-well plate, a dish, a vat, an incubator, a bioreactor, an industrial fermenter and the like. A cultivation infrastructure may be a culture medium in which metazoan cells are cultured.
A cultivation infrastructure can be of any scale, and support any volume of cellular biomass and culturing reagents. In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure ranges from about 10 μL to about 100,000 L. In exemplary embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure is about 10 μL, about 100 μL, about 1 mL, about 10 mL, about 100 mL, about 1 L, about 10 L, about 100 L, about 1000 L, about 10,000 L, or even about 100,000 L.
In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises a substrate. A cultivation infrastructure may comprise a permeable substrate (e.g. permeable to physiological solutions) or an impermeable substrate (e.g. impermeable to physiological solutions).
In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises a primary substrate, which can be a flat, concave, or convex substrate. In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure further comprises a secondary substrate, either introduced, or autologous, to direct cellular growth between the substrates, e.g. to direct attachment, proliferation and hypertrophy of cells on a plane perpendicular to the primary substrate.
In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises a hydrogel, a liquid cell culture media, or soft agar.
In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure does not comprise a substrate to which cells can adhere. In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises a suspension culture, e.g. supporting the growth of a self-adhering biomass, or single-cell suspension in a liquid medium.
In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises adherent cells (i.e. those cells that adhere to a substrate). In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises non-adherent cells (i.e. those cells that do not adhere to a substrate). In some embodiments, the cultivation infrastructure comprises both adherent and non-adherent cells.
Kits and Articles of Manufacture
The present application also provides kits for engineering cells of interest to increase production of glutamine, increase production of IGF, increase production of albumin, and/or decrease the production of ammonia.
In some embodiments, the kits comprise a GS DNA construct, an IGF construct, and/or an albumin construct for transfection. The kits optionally may further comprise tools for immortalization or extending cell self-renewal capacity, activating YAP/TAZ pathways, and myogenic differentiation.
The present application also provides articles of manufacture comprising any one of the compositions or kits described herein.
It is to be understood that the terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof. The following examples are for illustrative purposes. These are intended to show certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention but are not intended to limit the invention in any manner.
This example describes the effects of ectopic expression of GS on ammonia concentration in ambient media from primary duck fibroblast and myoblast cultures.
Methods
Measurement of Ammonia Concentration
Following the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma-Aldrich #AA0100), the absolute ammonia concentration (in μg/mL) was determined for each time point and treatment group (in biological triplicate). Results were reported as the mean of the treatment group bounded by the 95% confidence interval. Measurements of the ammonia detection assay were performed on a spectrophotometer (Spectramax 250). All statistical analyses and visualizations were performed in Microsoft Excel 2010.
Primary Duck Fibroblast and Myoblast Cultures
A peptide-coated (peptides mimicking extracellular matrix) T-150 flask was prepared for cell seeding by adding 10 mL of an aqueous peptide solution to the T-150 flask and incubated for at least 1 hour at 37° C. The aqueous peptide solution was aspirated from the T-150 flask and the flask washed with PBS. 25 mL of culture medium specific to the targeted cell type was added to the flask and the flask incubated and equilibrated at 37° C. in 5% atmospheric CO2.
Under aseptic conditions the targeted tissue was excised with dissection instruments. Tissue sections were minced into approximately 2 mm×2 mm sections. 150 mg tissue sections were weighed and then transferred to a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube containing 8 mL of enzymatic cell dissociation solution consisting of 0.17% trypsin and 0.085% collagenase in Hanks Balanced Salt Solution pH 7.4. The centrifuge tube was closed tightly and incubated on ice. Following overnight incubation, the tube was then incubated at 37° C. for 15 minutes. The enzymatic tissue digest was triturated with a sterile 5 mL serological pipet for 1 minute. The cell suspension was passed through a sterile 70 μm strainer into a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube. 20 mL of cold basal medium was flowed through the strainer. The strainer was discarded and the tube capped. The centrifuge tube was centrifuged at 300×g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was aspirated, and the cell pellet was resuspended in culture medium before transfer to the T-150 flask prepared for seeding. The flask was incubated at 37° C. in 5% atmospheric CO2. The cells were checked daily for growth and contamination. Culture medium was changed every two to three days. After the cultures reached a confluence of 70% to 90%, the cells were dissociated and either cryopreserved or passaged using standard cell culture technique.
Transfection
The primary duck fibroblast and myoblast cultures were routinely sub-cultured under 5% atmospheric CO2 at 37° C. (i.e. incubation conditions) until 80% confluent on gelatin-coated dishes. Cells were dissociated to single cells and counted to determine the number of cells. In a gelatin-coated 12-well tissue culture plate, 5×104 cells were seeded into each well. Growth culture medium was added to each well to a total final volume of 1 ml per well. The cells were incubated overnight at 37° C.
Cells were washed with PBS and transfection media added. 1 μg of plasmid DNA containing the murine GS coding sequence (pcDNA3.1+/C−(K)DYK (SEQ ID NO: 58), Genscript OMu19897D, Table 1A) driven by a CMV promoter was complexed using the Lipofectamine 3000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific #L3000001). The complexed DNA was added dropwise to each well in biological triplicate. Vehicle control cells received an equivalent treatment absent the DNA. The cells were shaken gently and incubated for 48 hours; the media was then changed to proliferation media supplemented with 10% FBS and either the combination of 434 μg/mL (2 mM) L-alanyl-L-glutamine and 584 μg/mL (4 mM) L-glutamine or no supplemented glutamine (0 mM glutamine, “glutamine absent”). The cells were then returned to incubation conditions.
Conditioned Media Collection
Cells were washed with PBS, and 1 mL of either glutamine-supplemented or glutamine-absent proliferation medium was added to each well. Cells were then returned to incubation.
200 μL media samples were collected from each well and stored in sterile tubes at −80° C. In a gelatin-coated 12-well plate, proliferation medium was incubated in wells devoid of cells (i.e. acellular) in parallel experimental wells containing cells as a background control for ammonia accumulation.
Following each 24-hour period through day seven, 200 μL samples of media were collected from each well stored at −80° C. 200 μL of fresh medium were then added to each of the wells to a total volume of 1 mL. Following sample collection, the plates were then returned to incubation conditions.
Results
As demonstrated in
As demonstrated in
As shown in
As demonstrated in
In both fibroblasts and myoblasts, transfection of GS resulted in statistically significant reduction of observed ammonia concentration compared to background ammonia generation (p<0.001, two-way ANOVA). In both cell types, there was a significant difference between ammonia concentrations in groups that were supplemented with glutamine compared to those that were not supplemented with glutamine (P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in cells transfected with GS compared to those transfected with vehicle alone when media was not supplemented with glutamine (p<0.001). The presence or absence of glutamine in cell culture media exhibits a significantly different effect between treatment groups (p<0.01, two-way ANOVA). Regression analysis reveals that the presence or absence of glutamine accounts for 72-98% of the variance of the data (p<0.001). Covariance analysis reveals strong positive interactions between systems where glutamine is present (4-12 fold greater than without glutamine), and a moderate interaction when cells are transfected with a GS gene or vehicle-only control, regardless of whether glutamine is present or not.
Based on data presented in
This example describes the effects of ectopic expression of IGF-1 and albumin expression on the concentration of IGF-1 and albumin in media in primary duck fibroblasts and myoblasts.
Primary duck myoblast and fibroblast cells were isolated and cultured as described in Example 1. Cells were washed with PBS and transfection medium was added. 1 μg of plasmid DNA comprising a human serum albumin gene (Genscript OHu18744, Table 1A), a murine serum albumin gene (Genscript OMu21640, Table 1A) or human insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (Origene RG212527, Table 1A) gene coding sequence fused to a nucleotide coding sequence encoding a FLAG-tag peptide (DYKDDDDK (SEQ ID NO: 57)) driven by a CMV promoter was complexed using the Lipofectamine 3000 system as a transfection vehicle (Thermo Fisher Scientific #L3000001). For transfection, the complexed DNA was added dropwise to each well in biological triplicate. Vehicle-only control cells received an equivalent treatment absent the DNA. The cell cultures were shaken gently and incubated for 48 hours; the transfection medium was then changed to growth medium and the cells were returned to incubation. Conditioned medium was collected as described in Example 1.
Indirect ELISA detection assays were used to measure the secretion of IGF-1 into the ambient medium by the cells. Ambient culture media samples were thawed and maintained on ice until use. Total protein concentration in media samples was determined by absorbance measurement on a spectrophotometer (Spectramax 250) using a BCA serial dilution method (Thermo Fisher Scientific #22325). Using untreated black walled, black-bottomed polystyrene 96-well plates, 1 μg of total protein from each treatment was adsorbed to the plate using 1× coating buffer (Abcam #ab210899). Following coating, the wells were washed and blocked using a 5% solution of non-fat dry milk (NFDM) in 1×PBS. Primary antibody (murine anti-DDK monoclonal, Origene #OTI4C5) was incubated at 1:5000 dilution in 5% NFDM/PBS at 4° C. for 18 hours. Wells were washed with PBS for three cycles of shaking for five minutes per cycle. Secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse-HRP conjugate, Sigma AP130P) was applied at a 1:10000 dilution in 5% NFDM/PBS for 1.5 hours at 22° C. A second PBS wash/shake cycle was applied to remove excess secondary antibody. QuantaRed kit detection was applied as per manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific #15159). Fluorescence emission values were obtained by a fluorometer (Tecan Infinite F200). Data was analyzed and visualized using Microsoft Excel 2010. Transfection with a plasmid encoding an IGF-1 protein resulted in a statistically significant 53% increase in secretion of IGF-1 into the ambient medium (
The manufacturing of an edible metazoan biomass, in one exemplary protocol, can comprise three steps:
Step 1 is expanding cell populations overexpressing containing a GS gene, an IGF gene, an albumin gene, or a combination thereof in a cell line capable of self-renewal, wherein the cell line is a myogenic transcription factor-modified cell line, and wherein the cell line is of from a livestock, poultry, game or an aquatic animal species. Selected cell populations overexpressing targeted genes are seeded onto a substrate consisting of peptide-coated tissue-culture treated plastic, in a standard growth medium at a density of 7.5×103 cells/cm2 and cultured at 37° C. under 5% CO2 atmospheric conditions. As cultures approach 80% confluence, cells are enzymatically dissociated and the expanded quantity of cells are seeded at 7.5×103 cells/cm2. This process is repeated until the total number of cells harvested following dissociation exceeds 1.0×108 cells.
Step 2 is cryopreserving and storing the expanded cell populations in a cryopreserved cell bank. Cells harvested in quantities equal to or exceeding 1.0×108 following expansion of selected cells are pelleted by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 300×g. The cell pellet is suspended in a standard cryopreservation medium at 2.5×106 cells/mL and aliquoted at 1.0 mL per cryovial. Cryovials are cooled to −80° C. at −1° C./minute using an insulated container and transferred to a dewar containing liquid nitrogen for long-term storage. As cells stocks are depleted from this bank, remaining vials of cells are expanded and cryopreserved to replenish the cryopreserved cell bank inventory.
Step 3 is seeding and cultivating cells from a master cell bank in an ex vivo milieu: In accordance with the cultivation scale desired, one or more vials from the master cell bank is rapidly thawed to room temperature. The cryopreservation medium is removed from the cells by a 5 minute, 300×g centrifugation step. Cells are suspended in standard growth medium and seeded onto a gelatin-coated cultivation substrate in standard growth medium as before, except that, on the final passage prior to harvest, the cells are permitted to proliferate to 100% confluence on the cell culture substrate. The growth medium is next exchanged for differentiation medium specific to the myogenic transcription factor-modified cell line, and the cultures are permitted to differentiate for up to 6 days inducing myogenic differentiation of the cell line, wherein the differentiated cell line forms myocytes and multinucleated myotubes; and the myocytes and myotubes are cultured to generate skeletal muscle fibers.
The cultivation scale for proliferative biomass is outlined according to Table 5, where the predicted average cell mass is 2.0×10−9 grams, and the predicted average cell doubling time is 24 hours (h).
Step 4 is harvesting cultivated cell biomass for dietary consumption. After the cells have proliferated to confluence, the culture medium is removed, and the adherent cell cultures are rinsed with phosphate buffered saline. Next, the confluent biomass of adherent cells mechanically dissociated from the substrate by means of a scraping device. The dissociated biomass is collected into centrifuge tubes, pelleted at 400×g for 5 minutes to remove excess liquid, and processed for food product preparation. Harvested yield of differentiated cell biomass are estimated by multiplying the projected biomass of the proliferative culture by four to account for biomass accumulation during cell differentiation.
The present application is a 371 National Stage application of PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/042187, filed on Jul. 13, 2018, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/532,345, filed Jul. 13, 2017, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2018/042187 | 7/13/2018 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/014652 | 1/17/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5624840 | Naughton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 6593275 | Unkefer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6767719 | Morin et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6835390 | Vein | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 7033744 | Kobayashi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7147871 | Voytik-Harbin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7270829 | Van Eelen | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 8105575 | Kim et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8703216 | Forgacs et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8883502 | Kumar | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9102739 | Lazar et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 20020068706 | Gyuris et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20050260748 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060121006 | Chancellor et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070248716 | Kruse et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20100319079 | Kruse et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110091604 | Miller | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191871 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225664 | Smith | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301249 | Challakere | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20130004466 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130029008 | Forgacs et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130171731 | Ivashchenko et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130224855 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130255003 | Forgacs et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140093618 | Forgacs et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140242155 | Ramunas et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140370537 | Sakurai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150025128 | Cain et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150079238 | Marga et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150087532 | Brown et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150133520 | Czech et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216216 | Marga | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150231209 | Hsueh et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150289541 | Brown et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150296834 | Geistlinger | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150296835 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305361 | Holtz-Schietinger et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305390 | Vrljic et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160227830 | Genovese et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160251625 | Genovese et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170101629 | Minshull et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170114382 | Follit et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170369849 | Hanson et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20190024079 | Genovese et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20200190524 | Minshull et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20210106032 | Leung et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210145031 | Leung et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2333966 | Dec 1999 | CA |
| 2780087 | Dec 2012 | CA |
| 1942576 | Apr 2007 | CN |
| 101624570 | Jan 2010 | CN |
| 0435617 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 1037966 | May 2003 | EP |
| 2013-81783 | May 2013 | JP |
| WO-1993009236 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO-1999031222 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO-1999-031223 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO-2006041429 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007071339 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2010-068897 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO-2012095514 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012170995 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012176023 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013007656 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013016547 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013073246 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO 2015038988 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015066377 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015120174 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015167959 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016052472 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017019125 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017120089 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017124100 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO-2018208628 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO-2019014652 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Animal Sake Farm Animals List, downloaded May 24, 2022; on the web atanimalsake.com/farm-animals-list. pp. 1-10. |
| Cox et al. Jan. 18, 2017; Yap reprograms glutamine metabolism to increase nucleotide biosynthesis and enable liver growth. Nat. Cell. Biol. 18(8): 886-896. |
| Kanzaki et al. 2002; Telomerase rescues the expression levels of keratinocyte growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-II in senescent human fibroblasts. Environmental Cell Research. 279: 321-329. |
| Bhat, Z.F. et al., “Prospectus of cultured meat—Advancing meat alternatives,” Journal of Food Science and Technology 48(2), Apr. 2010, pp. 125-140. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report and Opinion, EP Patent Application No. 18832585.6, dated Apr. 9, 2021, nine pages. |
| Fan, L. et al., “The use of glutamine synthetase as a selection marker: recent advances in Chinese hamster ovary cell line generation processes,” Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing 1(15), 2013, pp. 487-502. |
| Kadim, I.T. et al., “Cultured meat from muscle stem cells: A review of challenges and prospects,” Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14(2), Feb. 2015, pp. 222-233. |
| Paredes, C. et al., “Modification of glucose and glutamine metabolism in hybridoma cells through metabolic engineering,” Cytotechnology, vol. 30, Jul. 1999, pp. 85-93. |
| Zhu, C-H. et al. “Cellular Senescence in Human Myoblasts is Overcome by Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4: Consequences in Aging Muscle and Therapeutic Strategies for Muscular Dystrophies.” Aging Cell, vol. 6, No. 4, Aug. 2007, pp. 515-523. |
| Albini, S., et al., “Epigenetic Reprogramming of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Skeletal Muscle Cells and Generation of Contractile Myospheres,” Cell Reports 3:661-670 (2013). |
| Barberi, T., et al., “Derivation of engraftable skeletal myoblasts from human embryonic stem cells,” Nature Medicine 13(5):642-648(2007). |
| Bartholet, J., “Inside The Meat Lab A Handful Of Scientists Aim to Satisfy the World's Growing Appetite for Steak Without Wrecking The Planet. The First Step: Grab a Petri Dish,” Scientific American, pp. 65-69 (2011). |
| Benjaminson, M., et al.,“In Vitro Edible Muscle Protein Production System (MPPS): Stage 1, FISH,” Acta Astronautica 51(12):879-889 (2002). |
| Bentzinger, C., et al., “Building Muscle: Molecular Regulation of Myogenesism,” Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(2):1-16 (2012). |
| Bhagavati and Xu., “Generation Of Skeletal Muscle from Transplanted Embryonic Stem Cells in Dystrophic Mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 333:644-649 (2005). |
| Bhat and Bhat, “Animal-Free Meat Biofabrication,” American Journal of Food Technology 6(6):441-459, (2011). |
| Boonen and Post, “The Muscle Stem Cell Niche: Regulation of Satellite Cells During Regeneration,” Tissue Engineering—Part B: Reviews 14(4):419-431 (2008). |
| Cenciarelli et al., “Critical Role Played by Cyclin D3 in the Myod-Mediated Arrest of Cell Cycle During Myoblast Differentiation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 19(7):5203-5217 (1999). |
| Chang, et al., “Generation of Transplantable, Functional Satellite-Like Cells from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells,” FASEB J. 23, 1907-1919 (2009). |
| Chen et al., “Potentiation of MyoD1 Activity By 5-Aza-2′-Deoxycytidine,” Cell Growth & Differentiation, 1:383-392 (1990). |
| Chiu and Blau,“5-5Azacytidine Permits Gene Activation in a Previously Noninducible Cell Type,” Cell, vol. 40, 417-424 (1985). |
| Darabi, R., et al., “Assessment of the Myogenic Stem Cell Compartment Following Transplantation of Pax3/Pax7-Induced Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Progenitors,” Lillehei Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 27 pages (2011). |
| Darabi, R., et al., Functional Skeletal Muscle Regeneration From Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells, Nature and Medicine 14(2):134-143 (2008). |
| Datar and Betti, “Possibilities for an In Vitro Meat Production System,” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 11(1):13-22(2010). |
| Davis, R., et al., “Expression of a Single Transfected cDNA Converts Fibmblasts to Myoblasts,” Cell, vol. 51. 987-1000 (1987). |
| Dekel, I., et al., “Conditional Conversion of ES Cells to Skeletal Muscle by an Exogenous MyoDI Gene,” (1992). |
| Edelman, P. et al., “In Vitro-Cultured Meat Production,” Tissue Engineering 11(5/6):659-662 (2005). |
| Genovese et al.,“Enhanced Development of Skeletal Myotubes form Porcine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, 12 pages (2017). |
| Gianakopoulos, P., et al., “MyoD Directly Up-regulates Premyogenic Mesoderm Factors during Induction of Skeletal Myogenesis in Stem Cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 286(4):2517-2525 (2011). |
| Goudenege, S., et al., “Myoblasts Derived From Normal hESCs and Dystrophic hiPSCs Efficiently Fuse With Existing Muscle Fibers Following Transplantation,” Molecular Therapy 20(11):2153-2167 Nov. 2012 (2012). |
| Hollenberg, S., et al., “Use of a conditional MyoD transcription factor in studies of MyoD trans-activation and muscle determination,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 90, pp. 8028-8032 (1993). |
| Hopkins and Dacey, “Vegetarian meat: Could Technology Save Animals And Satisfy Meat Eaters?” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21(6):579-596 (2008). |
| Hwang, Y., et al., “Directed In Vitro Myogenesis of Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Their In Vivo Engraftment,” PLOS ONE e72023 8(8):1-10 (2013). |
| Iacovino, M., et al., “Inducible Cassette Exchange: A Rapid and Efficient System Enabling Conditional Gene Expression in Embryonic Stem and Primary Cells,” Stem Cells 2011;29:1580-1587 (2011). |
| Jones, N., “A Taste of Things to Come?” Nature 468:752-753 (2010). |
| Langelaan, et al., “Meet The New Meat: Tissue Engineered Skeletal Muscle,” Trends in Food Science & Technology 21(2):59-66 (2010). |
| Lassar, A., et al., “Transfection of a DNA Locus That Mediates the Conversion of IOTV2 Fibroblasts to Myoblasts,” Cell 47:649-656 (1986). |
| Lavial et al., “Chicken Embryonic Stem Cells As A Non-Mammalian Embryonic Stem Cell Model,” Development, Growth & Differentiation 52:101-1114 (2010). |
| Leung, M., et al., “Nanofiber-Based in Vitro System for High Myogenic Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells,” Biomacromolecules 14:4207-4216 (2013). |
| Li et al., “Short-Term Serum-Free Culture Reveals That Inhibition of Gsk3beta Induces the Tumor-Like Growth of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells,” 6(6):1/10-10/10 (2011). |
| Lian et al., Directed Cardiomyocyte Differentiation From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by Modulating Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling Under Fully Defined Conditions. Nature Protocols, 8(1):162-175 (2013). |
| Maak et al., “Identification and Analysis of Putative Regulatory Sequences for the MYF5/MYF6 Locus in Different Vertebrate Species,” Gene, 379:141-147 (2006). |
| Mahmood, A., Enhanced Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Mesenchymal Progenitors by Inhibition of TGF-beta/Activin/Nodal Signaling Using SB-431542 Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 25(6):1216-1233 (2010). |
| Mcfarlane et al., “Myostatin Signals Through Pax7 To Regulate Satellite Cell Self-Renewal,” Experimental Cell Research 314:317-329 (2008), available online Sep. 2007. |
| Minzuno, Y., et al., “Generation of Skeleta Muscle Stem/Progenitor Cells from Murine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells,” The FASEB Journal 24:2245-2243 (2010). |
| Ozasa et al., “Efficient Conversion Of ES Cells into Myogenic Lineage Using the Gene-Inducible System,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 357: 957-963 (2007). |
| Post, M., “Cultured beef: Medical Technology to Produce Food,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94(6): 1039-1041 (2014). |
| Post, M., “Cultured Meat From Stem Cells: Challenges and Prospects,” Meat Sci. 92(3):297-301 (2012). |
| Rohwedel, J., et al., “Muscle Cell Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells Reflects Myogenesis In Vivo: Developmentally Regulated Expression of Myogenic Determination Genes and Functional Expression of Ionic Currents.,” Dev Biol. 164(1):87-101 (1994). (Abstract). |
| Rommel, C., “Mediation of IGF-1-Induced Skeletal Myotube Hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 Pathways,” Nature Cell Biology 3:1009-1013 (2001). |
| Ryan, T., “Retinoic Acid Enhances Skeletal Myogenesis in Human Embryonic Stem Cells by Expanding the Premyogenic Progenitor Population,”Stem Cell Rev and Rep 8:482-493 (2012). |
| Sakurai, H., et al., “Paraxial Mesodermal Progenitors Derived from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Contribute to Muscle Regeneration via Differentiation into Muscle Satellite Cells,” Stem Cells 26:1865-1873 (2008). |
| Sakurai, H., et al., “Bidirectional Induction Toward Paraxial Mesodermal Derivatives from Mouse ES Cells In Chemically Defined Medium,” Stem Cell Research 3:157-169 (2009). |
| Salani, S., et al., “Generation Of Skeletal Muscle Cells from Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells As An In Vitro Model and for Therapy of Muscular Dystrophies,” J. Cell. Mol. Med. 16(7):1353-1364 (2012). |
| Sasaki, T., et al., “Generation of a Multi-Layer Muscle Fiber Sheet from Mouse ES Cells by the Spermine Action At Specific Timing and Concentration,” Differentiation 76:1023-1030(2008). |
| Tan et al., “Efficient Derivation Of Lateral Plate and Paraxial Mseoderm Subtypes From Human Embryonic Stem Cells Through GS Kimediated Differentiation,” Stem Cells and Development 22(13):1893-1906 (2013). |
| Tanaka, et al., “Efficient and Reproducible Myogenic Differentiation from Human iPS Cells: Prospects for Modeling Miyoshi Myopathy In Vitro,” PLOS ONE e61540 8(4):1-14 (2013). |
| Taylor et al. “Multiple new phenotypes induced in 10T1/2 and 3T3 cells treated with 5-azacytidine,” Cell 17:771-779 (1979). |
| Telugu, B., et al., “Lif-Dependent, Pluripotent Stem Cells Established From Inner Cell Mass of Porcine Embryos,” The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc., Downloaded from www.jbc.org at University of Missouri-Columbia, on Jul. 15, 2011 (2011). |
| Telugu, B., et al., “Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF)-dependent, Pluripotent Stem Cells Established from Inner Cell Mass of Porcine Embryos,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2011, 286(33):28948-28953. |
| Tuomisto, et al., “Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(14):6117-6123 (2011). |
| Van der Schaft, D., et al., “Engineering Skeletal Muscle Tissues From Murine Myoblast Progenitor Cells and Application of Electrical Stimulation,” J. Vis. Exp. 73:1-6 (2013)). |
| Van der Velden, J., et al., “Inhibition of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta-activity is Sufficient To Stimulate Myogenic Differentiation,” Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C453-C462, (2006). |
| Van Der Weele, C., “In Vitro Meat,” Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, pp. 1-8 (2014). |
| Van Der Weele, C., “In Vitro Meat: Promises and Responses: Cooperation Between Science, Social Research And Ethics,” Global Food Security: Ethical and Legal Challenges: EurSafe 2010 Bilbao, Spain Sep. 16-18, 2010, pp. 507-512. |
| Vyas, D., et al., “GSK-3 Negatively Regulates Skeletal Myotube Hypertrophy,” Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283: C545-C551 (2002). |
| Wagers, A., “Wnt Not, Waste Not,” Cell Stem Cell 2:6-7 (2008). |
| Wilschut, K., et al., “Extracellular Matrix Components Direct Porcine Muscle Stem Cell Behavior,” Experimental Cell Research 316:341-352 (2010). |
| Wilschut, K., et al., “Isolation and Characterization of Porcine Adult Muscle-Derived Progenitor Cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 105:1228-1239 (2008). |
| Wu, G., et al., “Production and Supply of High-Quality Food Protein for Human Consumption: Sustainability, Challenges, and Innovations,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1321(1):1-19 (2014). |
| Yokoyama et al., “The Myogenic Transcriptional Network,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68:1843-1849 (2011). |
| Zheng, J., K., et al., “Skeletal Myogenesis by Human Embryonic Stem Cells,” Cell Research 713-722 (2006). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by The International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US14/63250, dated Jan. 21, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2016 from The United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, filed Apr. 30, 2016, 28 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated May 19, 2017, from the European patent Office for Application No. 14858383.4, filed Oct. 30, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2017, from The United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, filed Apr. 30, 2016, 28 pages. |
| Baquero-Perez et al., “A Simplified but Robust Method for the Isolation of Avaian and Mammalian Satellite cells,” BMC Cell Biology 13(16):1/11-11/11 (2012). |
| Rezanejad et al., Induced pluripotent stem cells: Progress and future perspectives in the stem cell world. Cellular Reprogramming 14(6):459-470 (2012). |
| Weintraub et al. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 86:5434-5438 (1989). |
| Hanas et al. Potentiation of myogenesis by 5-azacytidine. Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 91, No. 2, p. 27, Abstract 1051, Nov. 1981. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2018 from The United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, filed Apr. 20, 2016, 28 pages. |
| Rinkevich, B. Cell cultures from marine invertebrates: New insights for capturing endless sternness. Marine Biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 345-354, Jun. 2011, Epub Jan. 7, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
| Nowak-Imialek et al. Pluripotent cells in farm animals: state of the art and future perspectives. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 103-108, 2012. (Year: 2012). |
| Blomberg et al. Twenty years of embryonic stem cell research in farm animals. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, vol. 47, Suppl. 4, pp. 80-85, Aug. 2012. (Year: 2012). |
| Molkentin et al. Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins. Cell, vol. 83, pp. 1125-1136, Dec. 1995. (Year: 1995). |
| Hupkes et al. Epigenetics: DNA demethylation promotes skeletal myyotube maturation. The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 3861-3872, Nov. 2011. (Year: 2011). |
| Chen et al. DNA methyltransferase inhibitor CDA-11 inhibits myogenic differentiation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 422, pp. 522-526, May 22, 2012. (Year: 2012). |
| Hu, Yang “Exercise molecule biology,” Beijing Sport University press, pp. 152-157 (2013). |
| A. The English translation of paragraph 2 on p. 152 to paragraph 1 on p. 157 of Ref 145. |
| Yu et al., “Chinese Disease Signal Pathway and Targeted Therapy,” Anhui Science and Technology Press, p. 372 (2013). |
| B. The English translation of paragraphs 4-8 on p. 372 of Ref 147. |
| Nagashima et al., “The Hippo Pathway as Drug Targets in Cancer Therapy and Regenerative Medicine,” Current Drug Targets, (2017), vol. 18, pp. 447-454. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by The International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2018/031276, dated Sep. 10, 2018, 10 pages. |
| Wang et. al., “Immortalization of chicken preadipocytes by retroviral transduction of chicken TERT and TR,” (2017), PLoS ONE 12(5): e0177348. retrieved May 9, 2017 at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177348. |
| Jesus et. al., “The telomerase activator TA-65 elongates short telomeres and increases health span of adult/old mice without increasing cancer incidence,” Aging Cell 10:604-621 (2011). |
| Bell et al., “Understanding TERT Promoter Mutations: A Common Path to Immortality,” Mol Cancer Res 14:315-323 (2016). Published OnlineFirst Mar. 3, 2016, retrieved Jul. 6, 2017 from mcr.aacrjournals.org, 10 pages. |
| Dominguez et al., “Beyond editing: repurposing CRISPR-Cas9 for precision genome regulation and interrogation,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 17:5-15 (2016). |
| Liu et. al., “Linking Telomere Regulation to Stem Cell Pluripotency,” Trends in Genetics 33(1): 16-33 (2017). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2017/13782, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Pandurangan, et al. A novel approach for in vitro meat production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. Jul. 2015; 99(13):5391-5395. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6671-5. Epub May 14, 2015. |
| Munro, et al. Histone deacetylase inh1b1tors induce a senescence-like state in human cells by a p16-dependent mechanism that is independent of a mitotic clock. Exp Cell Res. 2004 295(2):525-538. |
| Sharpless, et al. Forging a signature of in vivo senescence. Nature Reviews Cancer 2015, 15(7):397-408. |
| Harley, “Telomerase is not an oncogene,” Oncogene 2002, 21(4):494-502. |
| Garrels et al. Ectopic expression of human telomerase KNA component results 1n increased telomerase activity and elongated telomeres in bovine blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 2012, 87(4):95, 1-7. |
| Barnes, et al., Advances in animal cell recombinant protein production: GS-NS0 expression system, Cytotechnology 2000, vol. 32, pp. 109-123. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2018 from The United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, filed Apr. 30, 2016, 24 pages. |
| George et al. “Exploiting Expression of Hippo Effector, Yap, for Expansion of Functional Islet Mass,” Molecular Endocrinology. Sep. 17, 2015 (Sep. 17, 2015), vol. 29, Iss. 11, pp. 1594-1607. entire document. |
| Watt et al. “Regulation of Tissue Growth by the Mammalian Hippo Signaling Pathway,” Frontiers in Physiology. Nov. 24, 2017 (Nov. 14, 2017), vol. B, Article 942, pp. 1-12. entire document. |
| Huang et al. “Zfp423 Promotes Adipogenic Differentiation of Bovine Stromal Vascular Cells,” PLOS ONE, Oct. 2012, vol. 7, Issue 10, 10 pages. |
| Van Der Weele et al. Cultured meat: every village its own factory?, Trends in Biotechnology, Jun. 2014, vol. 32, No. 6, 3 pages. |
| Wooton et al. “Telomerase Alone Extends the Replicative Life Span of Human Skeletal Muscle Cells Without Compromising Genomic Stability,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 14, No. 15, Oct. 10, 2003, 15 pages. |
| Lee et al. “Establishment of an immortal chicken embryo liver-derived cell line,” 2013 Poultry Science, vol. 92, No. 6, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2018/042187, dated Nov. 1, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Xu et al., “Effects of glutamine and asparagine on recombinant antibody production using CHO-GS cell lines,” Biotechnol Prog. Nov.-Dec. 2014;30(6):1457-68. |
| Noh et al., “Reduction of ammonia and lactate through the coupling of glutamine synthetase selection and downregulation of lactate dehydrogenase-A in CHO cells,” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. Feb. 2017;101(3):1035-1045. |
| Knox et al., “A streamlined implementation of the glutamine synthetase-based protein expression system,” BMC Biotechnol. Sep. 24, 2013;13:74, 10 pages. |
| Addgene. “pBABE-hygro-hTERT.” Plasmid #1773, Dec. 1998, 6 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Dec. 3, 2020], Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.addgene.org/1773/>. |
| Addgene. “pBABE-neo-hTERT.” Plasmid #1774, Dec. 1998, 5 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Dec. 4, 2020], Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.addgene.org/1774/>. |
| Black, Brian L., and Eric N. Olson. “Transcriptional control of muscle development by myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins” Annual review of cell and developmental biology 14.1 (1998): 167-196. |
| Canizo et al., “Exogenous human OKSM factors maintain pluripotency gene expression of bovine and porcine iPS-like cells obtained with STEMCCA delivery system,” BMC Research Notes vol. 11, Article No. 509 (2018), 8 pages. |
| Chen, et al., Homeostatic control of Hippo signaling activity revealed by an endogenous activating mutation in YAP, Genes & Development, 29: 1285-1297. (Year: 2015). |
| Choi, Sang-Woon, and Simonetta Friso. “Epigenetics: a new bridge between nutrition and health” Advances in nutrition 1.1 (2010): 8-16. |
| Darabi, R., et al, “Perspective Lineage-Specific Reprogramming as a Strategy for Cell Therapy,” Cell Cycle 7(12):1732-1737 (2008). |
| Delany, M. E. et al. “Telomeres in the Chicken: Genome Stability and Chromosome Ends.” Poultry Science, vol. 82, No. 6, Jun. 1, 2003, pp. 917-926. |
| Desbois-Mouthon, Christele, et al. “Insulin and IGF-1 stimulate the .beta.-catenin pathway through two signalling cascades involving GSK-3.beta, inhibition and Ras activation” Oncogene 20.2 (2001): 252-259. |
| Ding, Vanessa MY, et al. “FGF-2 modulates Wnt signaling in undifferentiated hESC and iPS cells through activated PI3-K/GSK3.beta. signaling” Journal of cellular physiology 225.2 (2010): 417-428. |
| Dong, J. et al. “Elucidation of a Universal Size-Control Mechanism in Drosophila and Mammals,” Cell, vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 1120-1133, Sep. 21, 2007. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report and Opinion, EP Patent Application No. 18797874.7, dated May 21, 2021, 15 pages. |
| Genbank. “Bos Taurus Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, mRNA (cDNA Clone MGC:133903 IMAGE:8041087), Complete CDS.” NCBI, GenBank: BC109858.1, Nov. 2005, 2 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Dec. 7, 2020], Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/BC109858>. |
| Genbank. “Gallus Gallus Gallus Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) mRNA, Complete CDS.” GenBank: NCBI, AY502592.1, 2004, 3 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Dec. 7, 2020], Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AY502592>. |
| He Rong et al., “Expression and clinical significance of p15 protein, mRNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis, vol. 13, No. 5, Jun. 19, 2009, pp. 618-622, (with English abstract). |
| Hupkes, Marlinda, et al. “DNA methylation restricts spontaneous multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells, but is stable during growth factor-induced terminal differentiation” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research 1813.5 (2011): 839-849. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/063250, dated May 3, 2016. |
| Kucharczak, J. et al., “R-Cadherin Expression Inhibits Myogenesis and Induces Myoblast Transformation via Rac1 GTPase,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, No. 16, Aug. 15, 2008, pp. 6559-6568. |
| Lei, et al., TAZ promotes cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition and is inhibited by the hippo pathway, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 28(7): 2426-2436. (Year: 2008). |
| Iemata, M., et al., “Suppression by Glutamate of Proliferative Activity Through Glutathione Depletion Mediated by the Cystine/Glutamate Anti porter in Mesenchymal C3H10T1/2 Stem Cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 213:721-729 (2007). |
| Mannaerts et al. The Hippo pathway effector YAP controls mouse hepatic stellate cell activation, Journal of Hepatology, 63: 679-688 (Year: 2015). |
| Mckinnon, T. et al., “Kras activation in p53-deficient myoblasts results in high-grade sarcoma formation with impaired myogenic differentiation,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, No. 16, Jun. 10, 2015, pp. 14220-14232. |
| Minniti, C.P. et al., “Insulin-like growth factor II overexpression in myoblasts induces phenotypic changes typical of the malignant phenotype,” Cell Growth & Differentiation, vol. 6, Mar. 1995, pp. 263-269. |
| Miranda, A.F. et al., “Transformation of human skeletal muscle cells by simian virus 40,” PNAS, vol. 80, Nov. 1983, pp. 6581-6585. |
| Nguyen, H.T. et al., “Viral Small T Oncoproteins Transform Cells by Alleviating Hippo-Pathway-Mediated Inhibition of the YAP Proto-oncogene,” Cell Reports, vol. 8, No. 3, Aug. 7, 2014, pp. 707-713. |
| Overholtzer, M. et al., “Transforming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11a22 amplicon,” PNAS, vol. 103, No. 33, Aug. 15, 2006, pp. 12405-12410. |
| Park et al. “Generation of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells and evaluation of their major histocompatibility complex protein expression in vitro.” Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 293-301, Dec. 2013, published online Aug. 23, 2013. (Year: 2013). |
| Poon et al., The sterile 20-like kinase Tao-1 controls tissue growth by regulating the Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway, Developmental Cell, 21: 896-906. (Year: 2011). |
| Rao, L., et al., “Highly Efficient Derivation of Skeletal Myotubes from Human Embryonic Stem Cells,” Stem Cell Rev and Rep 8:1109-1119 (2012). |
| Schnapp, Esther, et al. “Induced early expression of mrf4 but not myog rescues myogenesis in the myod/myf5 double-morphant zebrafish embryo” Journal of Cell Science 122.4 (2009): 481-488. |
| Schutte, U. et al., “Hippo Signaling Mediates Proliferation, Invasiveness, and Metastatic Potential of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma,” Translational Oncology, vol. 7, Iss. 2, Apr. 2014, pp. 309-321. |
| Stadler, G. et al. “Establishment of Clonal Myogenic Cell Lines from Severely Affected Dystrophic Muscles—CDK4 Maintains the Myogenic Population.” Skeletal Muscle, vol. 1, Article 12, Mar. 2011, pp. 1-10. |
| Tako, E. et al. “Using the Domestic Chicken (Gallus gallus) as an In Vivo Model for Iron Bioavailability.” Poultry Science, vol. 89, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2010, pp. 514-521. |
| Tseng et al. The GSK-3 inhibitor BIO promotes proliferation in mammalian cardiomyocytes. Chemistry & Biology, vol. 13, pp. 957-963, Sep. 2006. (Year: 2006). |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 31 pages. |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, dated Jul. 13, 2017, 43 pages. |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, dated Mar. 12, 2018, 28 pages. |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, dated Mar. 3, 2020, 18 pages. |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,252, dated Nov. 27, 2018, 21 pages. |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/070,251, dated Jan. 8, 2021, 31 pages. |
| United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/070,251, dated Jul. 9, 2021, 21 pages. |
| West et al. Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells produce chimeric offspring. Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1211-1220, 2010. (Year: 2010). |
| Wilschut, K., et al., “Alpha 6 Integrin is Important for Myogenic Stem Cell Differentiation,” Stem Cell Research 7:112-123 (2011). |
| Yu et al., “Chinese Disease Signal Pathway and Targeted Therapy,” Anhui Science and Technology Press, p. 372 (2013), (English translation not available). |
| Zeng, Q. et al., “The Emerging Role of the Hippo Pathway in Cell Contact Inhibition, Organ Size Control, and Cancer Development in Mammals,” Cancer Cell, vol. 13, Mar. 2008, pp. 188-192. |
| Zhao, B. et al., “Cell detachment activates the Hippo pathway via cytoskeleton reorganization to induce anoikis,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, Jan. 2012, pp. 54-68. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210340570 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62532345 | Jul 2017 | US |
