Compositions and methods for nutritional supplements

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11752188
  • Patent Number
    11,752,188
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 3, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 12, 2023
    7 months ago
  • Inventors
    • Pond; Hartley (Sebastopol, CA, US)
  • Original Assignees
    • Daily Colors Health Inc. (Sebastopol, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Mi; Qiuwen
    Agents
    • Fessenmaier; Martin
    • Umberg Zipser LLP
Abstract
Compositions and methods are presented in which a plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols inhibit multiple enzymes in pathways associated with health and healthy ageing. Preferred compositions are derived from colored plant materials that are commonly found in the Mediterranean diet and provide the biochemical basis for the health benefits of the Mediterranean diet. Notably, the enzyme inhibition observed with the combined polyphenols was synergistic with respect to not one but a significant number of enzymes in the pathways associated with health and healthy ageing, thus providing an amplified desirable effect.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention is compositions and methods for nutritional supplements, especially as it relates polyphenols and polyphenol mixtures commonly associated with a diet rich in fruits and vegetables and their use in conditions, disorders, and diseases associated with various enzymes inhibited by such polyphenol mixtures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The background description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present disclosure. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.


All publications and patent applications herein are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Where a definition or use of a term in an incorporated reference is inconsistent or contrary to the definition of that term provided herein, the definition of that term provided herein applies and the definition of that term in the reference does not apply.


There is a considerable variety of vitamins and other isolated nutritional compounds, and alleged benefits of such compounds include, among numerous other effects, immune support, anti-inflammatory effects, anti-ageing effects, cardiac support, and digestive support. Unfortunately, there is only a rather small body of evidence that substantiates some aspects of these alleged benefits when these vitamins and other isolated nutritional compounds are ingested. Similarly, where the nutritional supplement is an extract or powdered form of a plant part, various benefits are advertised, but actual benefits are often poorly or even not at all proven. Moreover, isolated nutritional compounds as well as individual plant extracts and concentrates are generally not reflective of a healthy diet.


Notably, there are certain geographic and ethnographic diet types that are associated with overall health, longevity, and/or physical resilience, and such beneficial effects are indeed well documented and substantiated. For example, the Mediterranean diet is typically associated with lower cardiovascular risk factors (see e.g., Nutrients 2018, 10, 379; doi:10.3390/nu10030379), lower inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers, a reduction in risk of Alzheimer's disease (see e.g., J Alzheimers Dis. 2010 ; 22(2): 483-492.), and with a reduction in certain inflammatory markers (see e.g., Nutrients 2018, 10, 62; doi:10.3390/nu10010062). One common ingredient class found in such diets are polyphenols, and various studies have been published regarding specific benefits of individual dietary polyphenols (see e.g., Inhibitory Properties of Phenolic Compounds Against Enzymes Linked with Human Diseases: URL: dx.doi.org/10.5772/66844), and selected colored polyphenols (see e.g., Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2020. 11:10.1-10.38). However, due to the complexity and large number of chemically distinct polyphenols, many studies only focus on single polyphenols and particular biochemical effects of such compounds or provide general epidemiological information without more detailed molecular characterization of the diets.


In an effort to supplement a diet with multiple polyphenols, various supplements are known. For example, Vital Reds (by Gundry MD) provides a commercially available concentrated polyphenol powder blend from a number of red colored plant materials to increase energy and improve digestion. Such blend advantageously includes a variety of chemically distinct polyphenols. However, the selection of plant materials used as a source of polyphenols is not reflective of common dietary intake. Similarly, Oxxynea by Fytexia, a commercially available mixture of grape, olive, pomegranate, green tea, grapefruit, bilberry, and orange extracts is offered as an antioxidant formulation to protect cells from oxidative stress (see e.g., Oxxynea by Fytexia). While beneficial to reduce oxidative stress, the source ingredients for such antioxidant formulation are once more not reflective of a common dietary intake. Surprisingly, despite the numerous beneficial components found in various dietary supplements, there is no supplement that is expected to provide the various benefits of a Mediterranean diet, and particularly the benefits of colored polyphenolic components in Mediterranean diet.


Thus, even though various nutritional supplements are known in the art, all or almost all of them suffer from various disadvantages. Consequently, there is a need to provide improved compositions and methods for nutritional supplements, and especially beneficial/synergistic combinations of polyphenols known to be associated with healthy diets such as the Mediterranean diet.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventor has now discovered various compositions and methods for specific combinations of polyphenols and/or polyphenol-rich materials (e.g., extracts and powders) commonly found in food items of the Mediterranean diet that exhibited, when combined, numerous benefits associated with the benefits of the Mediterranean diet. Indeed, the compositions and methods disclosed herein had substantial, and in some cases significant synergistic effect on a variety of molecular biomarkers associated with the benefits of the Mediterranean diet such as markers for ageing, senescence, inflammation, immune function, NAD/energy metabolism, and the gut microbiome.


In one aspect of the inventive subject matter, the inventor contemplates a nutritional composition that comprises a nutritionally acceptable carrier in combination with a plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color. Preferably, the chemically distinct polyphenols from the plant materials are present as a synergistic combination with respect to inhibition of at least one biochemical marker selected from the group consisting of BACE1, CD38, CD73, CDK5, JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3.


For example, in some embodiments the red colored plant materials comprise at least one (or two, or three, or all of) of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials comprise at least one (or two, or three, or all of) of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials comprise at least one (or two, or three, or all of) of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials comprise at least one (or two, or three, or all of) of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


In further aspect of the inventive subject matter, the chemically distinct polyphenols further inhibit at least one additional biochemical marker selected from the group consisting of ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT-1, CD39, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, and Cathepsin S. Moreover, contemplated compositions may further inhibit Keap/Nrf2 binding and/or ACE2/Spike binding.


Most typically, but not necessarily, the composition is formulated in single dosage units for oral administration (e.g., each containing between 50 and 1,000 mg of the composition), which may be formulated as a capsule, a gummy, or a powder. Where desired, the composition may further comprise a vitamin, a dietary trace element or mineral, a nicotinamide riboside, a probiotic, and/or a prebiotic.


Therefore, in another aspect of the inventive subject matter, the inventor contemplates a nutritional composition that includes a nutritionally acceptable carrier in combination with a plurality of chemically distinct polyphenol-containing plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color. Most preferably, the red colored plant materials comprise an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder; the green colored plant materials comprise an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder; the orange-yellow colored plant materials comprise an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder; and the purple-blue colored plant materials comprise a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder. For example, the apple extract, the pomegranate extract, the olive extract, the rosemary extract, the green coffee bean extract, the onion extract, the ginger extract, the grapefruit extract, the grape extract, and the blueberry extract may be ethanol extracts or ethanol/water extracts.


In such compositions the combination of plant materials is a synergistic combination with respect to inhibition of at least one biochemical marker selected from the group consisting of BACE1, CD38, CD73, CDK5, JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3, and especially with respect to inhibition of BACE1, CD38, and CD73. Preferred compositions further inhibit at least one additional biochemical marker selected from the group consisting of ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT-1, CD39, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, and Cathepsin S, and may also inhibit Keap/Nrf2 binding and/or ACE2/Spike binding.


As before, it is preferred (but not needed) that the composition is formulated in single dosage units for oral administration. Typically, the dosage unit contains between 50 and 1,000 mg of the composition, and is formulated as a capsule, a gummy, or a powder. Where desired, contemplated compositions may further comprise a vitamin, a dietary trace element or mineral, a nicotinamide riboside, a probiotic, and/or a prebiotic.


Among other uses, contemplated compositions will be effective to treat and/or reduce a symptom of inflammatory condition, a cardiovascular condition, a neurological condition, a metabolic condition, and a cancer.


Therefore, the inventor also contemplates a method of supporting health of an individual that comprises a step of administering the compositions presented herein. For example, the composition may be administered to thereby provide immune support, metabolic support, support longevity, support central nervous system (CNS) function, reduce an inflammatory response, reduce effects of cardiovascular disease, and reduce the rate of amyloid beta plaque formation.


In further examples of such methods, the composition is orally administered over at least 30 days, typically at a daily dose of between 50 and 1,000 mg. As noted earlier, contemplated compositions may further comprise a step of co-administering a vitamin, a dietary trace element or mineral, a nicotinamide riboside, a probiotic, and/or a prebiotic (which may be performed in the same dosage unit or individually).


In another aspect of the inventive subject matter the inventor also contemplates a method of reducing an NAD+ decrease (e.g., age-related NAD+ decrease) in an individual that includes a step of administering to the individual a synergistic combination of polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color wherein the combination synergistically inhibits CD38. In some embodiments, the polyphenols are provided in from of the plant materials.


Preferably, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


In a further aspect of the inventive subject matter the inventor contemplates a method of supporting longevity of an individual that includes a step of administering to the individual a synergistic combination of polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color wherein the combination synergistically inhibits CD73. In some embodiments, the polyphenols are provided in from of the plant materials.


Preferably, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


In yet another aspect of the inventive subject matter the inventor contemplates a method of supporting cognitive function of an individual that includes a step of administering a synergistic combination of polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color wherein the combination synergistically inhibits BACE1. In some embodiments, the polyphenols are provided in from of the plant materials, and administration increases immune function to thereby support longevity and/or reduces the rate of amyloid beta plaque formation.


Preferably, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


In still another aspect of the inventive subject matter the inventor contemplates a method of supporting central nervous system (CNS) function in an individual that includes a step of administering a synergistic combination of polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color wherein the combination synergistically inhibits CDK5. In some embodiments, the polyphenols are provided in from of the plant materials, and administration reduces age-related cognitive decline.


Preferably, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


In a further aspect of the inventive subject matter the inventor contemplates a method of supporting immune function in an individual that includes a step of administering a synergistic combination of polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color wherein the combination synergistically inhibits at least one of JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3. In some embodiments, the polyphenols are provided in from of the plant materials, and administration reduces a symptom of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel disease.


Preferably, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


Additionally, the inventor also contemplates a method of inhibiting at least one of BACE1, CD38, CD73, CDK5, JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3 that includes a step of contacting at least one of the BACE1, the CD38, the CD73, the CDK5, the JAK1, the JAK2, and the JAK3 with a plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color, wherein the chemically distinct polyphenols from the plant materials are a synergistic combination with respect to inhibition of at least one biochemical marker selected from the group consisting of the BACE1, the CD38, the CD73, the CDK5, the JAK1, the JAK2, and the JAK3. In some embodiments, the polyphenols are provided in from of the plant materials.


For example, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


Advantageously, the step of contacting is performed in vivo (e.g., oral administration to a mammal), and administration of the plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols provides immune support, metabolic support, support longevity, supports central nervous system (CNS) function, reduces an inflammatory response, reduces effects of cardiovascular disease, and/or reduces the rate of amyloid beta plaque formation.


Viewed from a different perspective, the inventor also contemplates a method of treating a condition that is associated with activity of at least one of BACE1, CD38, CD73, CDK5, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT-1, CD39, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, and Cathepsin S in a mammal. Such method will typically include a step of administering to the mammal a plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols in an amount effective to inhibit at least one of the BACE1, the CD38, the CD73, the CDK5, the JAK1, the JAK2, the JAK3, the ARG-1, the ARG-2, the SIRT-1, the CD39, the IDO1, the IDO2, the NAMPT, the PCSK9, the CD47, and the Cathepsin S. In preferred embodiments, the chemically distinct polyphenols synergistically inhibit BACE1, CD38, CD73, CDK5, JAK1, JAK2, and/or JAK3.


For example, the condition may be an inflammatory condition, a cardiovascular condition, a neurological condition, a metabolic condition, and/or a cancer. Where desired, the plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols are from plant materials having a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and a purple-blue color. For example, the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder. It should also be appreciated that the polyphenols may be provided in from of the plant materials.


Moreover, it is contemplated that the plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols may be orally administered to the mammal, typically at a daily dosage of between 50 and 1,000 mg. Where desired, such methods may further comprise a step of co-administering to the mammal a vitamin, a dietary trace element or mineral, a nicotinamide riboside, a probiotic, and/or a prebiotic.


In still further contemplated embodiments, the chemically distinct polyphenols are administered in an amount effective to inhibit at least three (or at least five or at least ten or all) of the BACE1, the CD38, the CD73, the CDK5, the JAK1, the JAK2, the JAK3, the ARG-1, the ARG-2, the SIRT-1, the CD39, the IDO1, the IDO2, the NAMPT, the PCSK9, the CD47, and the Cathepsin S.


Therefore, and viewed from a different perspective, the inventor also contemplates the use of a plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols to support healthy ageing. Moreover, it is contemplated that the plurality of chemically distinct polyphenols in such use further inhibit SIRT-1, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, Keap/Nrf2 binding, and/or ACE2/Spike binding, and/or that the chemically distinct polyphenols synergistically inhibit the BACE1, the CD38, the CD73, the CDK5, the JAK1, the JAK2, and/or the JAK3.


As before, it is preferred that the red colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the green colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the orange-yellow colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the purple-blue colored plant materials are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.


Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the inventive subject matter will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, along with the accompanying drawing figures in which like numerals represent like components.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a graph depicting exemplary results for ARG-1 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 2 is a graph depicting exemplary results for ARG-2 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 3 is a graph depicting exemplary results for SIRT1 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 4 is a graph depicting exemplary results for Keap1-Nrf2 binding inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 5 is a graph depicting exemplary results for ACE2-Spike S1 binding inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 6 is a graph depicting exemplary results for ACE2-Spike S1 binding inhibition using a multivitamin composition.



FIG. 7 is a graph depicting exemplary results for ACE2-Spike S1 binding inhibition using various further compositions according to the inventive subject matter



FIG. 8 is a graph depicting exemplary results for BACE1 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 9 is a graph depicting exemplary results for BACE1 inhibition using various further compositions according to the inventive subject matter and a multivitamin composition.



FIG. 10 is a graph depicting exemplary results for Cathepsin S inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 11 is a graph depicting exemplary results for Cathepsin S inhibition using various further compositions according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 12 is a graph depicting exemplary results for Cathepsin S inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter and a multivitamin composition.



FIG. 13 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CDK5/p25 binding inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 14 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CDK5/p25 binding inhibition using various further compositions according to the inventive subject matter and a multivitamin composition.



FIG. 15 is a graph depicting exemplary results for IDO1 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 16 is a graph depicting exemplary results for IDO2 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 17 is a graph depicting exemplary results for NAMPT inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 18 is a graph depicting exemplary results for PCSK9:LDLR binding inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 19 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD47 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 20 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD38 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 21 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD38 inhibition using further compositions according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 22 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD38 inhibition using known compositions containing nicotinamide riboside.



FIG. 23 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD38 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter and a known multivitamin composition.



FIG. 24 is a graph depicting exemplary results for JAK1 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 25 is a graph depicting exemplary results for JAK2 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 26 is a graph depicting exemplary results for JAK3 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 27 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD39 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 28 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD39 inhibition using a composition at low concentrations according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 29 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD39 inhibition using further compositions according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 30 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD39 inhibition using selected compositions according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 31 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD39 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter and a known multivitamin composition.



FIG. 32 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD73 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 33 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD73 inhibition using a composition at low concentrations according to the inventive subject matter.



FIG. 34 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD73 inhibition using further compositions according to the inventive subject matter



FIG. 35 is a graph depicting exemplary results for CD73 inhibition using a composition according to the inventive subject matter and a known multivitamin composition.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The inventor has discovered that specific combinations of polyphenol-containing materials (and polyphenols found therein) strongly modulated numerous biomarkers associated with the beneficial effects of the Mediterranean diet. In view of these findings, the inventor therefore contemplates various compositions for nutritional supplements and other nutritional products, compositions, and uses in medicinal food, and even use in medicine.


Most notably, the compositions presented herein had substantial and synergistic effects on a number of biomarkers associated with proper immune and CNS function, effective cellular metabolism, and longevity, and showed further significant effect on additional biomarkers associated with inflammatory responses, adverse effects of cardiovascular disease, and/or amyloid beta plaque formation. For example, the compositions and methods presented herein were demonstrated to have significant and beneficial effects on multiple enzymatic targets that are involved with numerous aspects of health and healthy ageing such as ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT1, BACE1, Cathepsin S, CDK5, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, CD38, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, CD39, and CD73, Keap/Nrf2. Viewed from a different perspective, it should be appreciated that the compositions presented herein are useful to beneficially affect multiple pathways associated with health and healthy ageing via inhibition of key signaling components and/or enzymes in these pathways. Remarkably, the observed modulation of these biomarkers using the compositions presented herein paralleled the profile of biomarkers in individuals that adhered to the Mediterranean diet and individuals with significant longevity.


For example, arginase 1 (ARG1) and arginase 2 (ARG2) are key enzymes in the urea cycle, cleaving L-arginine to form urea and L-omithine. The urea cycle provides protection against excess ammonia, while L-ornithine is required for cell proliferation, collagen formation, and other important physiological functions. Notably, increases in arginase activity in mammals have been linked to dysfunction and pathologies of the cardiovascular system, kidney, and central nervous system, and also to dysfunction of the immune system and development of cancer. Two important aspects of the excessive activity of arginase may be involved in diseases. First, overly active arginase can reduce the supply of L-arginine needed for the production of nitric oxide (NO) by NO synthase. Second, excessive quantities of L-ornithine can lead to structural problems in the vasculature, neuronal toxicity, and abnormal growth of tumor cells (see e.g., Physiol Rev 98: 641-665, 2018). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that increased formation of reactive oxygen species and key inflammatory mediators promote a pathological elevation of arginase activity. As such, inhibition of ARG1 and ARG2 is thought to beneficially counteract the adverse effects of arginase overactivity. As is shown on more detail below, contemplated compositions were effective in inhibiting ARG1 and ARG2 activity even at relatively low concentrations.


In another example, sirtuin1 (SIRT1) is a nuclear enzyme that deacetylates transcription factors that contribute to cellular regulation, and particularly to reaction to stressors. For example, SIRT1 deacetylates members of the PGC1-alpha/ERR-alpha complex, which are critical metabolic regulatory transcription factors, and deacetylates/deactivates the p53 protein, which is a key factor in many neoplastic diseases. SIRT1 was also demonstrated to play a role in activating T helper 17 cells, which contribute to autoimmune disease. As is shown in more detail below, contemplated compositions were effective in mildly inhibiting SIRT1 activity at relatively moderate concentrations.


In yet another example, beta-secretase 1 (BACE1) has been shown to be essential for the generation of β-amyloid in Alzheimer's disease and has also been reported to be associated with cognitive decline and decline in central nervous system (CNS) function (see e.g., Molecules. 2017 Oct. 13;22(10):1723). Indeed, β-amyloid accumulation is a hallmark of ageing, and as such inhibitory compounds are thought to beneficially decelerate or even stop β-amyloid accumulation and as such preserve or maintain cognitive abilities and CNS function. As is described in more detail below, contemplated compositions have shown remarkable, strong, and even synergistic effect with regard to BACE 1 inhibition.


In yet another example, higher levels of Cathepsin S have been reported to be associated with higher risk of mortality and were in some studies also associated with higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (e.g., JAMA, Sep. 14, 2011—Vol 306, No. 10 1113). Other experimental studies have suggested that cathepsin S activity is involved in the development of cardiovascular disease via promotion of atherosclerotic plaques and destabilization of advanced plaques. Moreover, cathepsin S activity was also implicated in the development of cancer via stimulation of cancer cell migration and tumor angiogenesis, and higher levels of Cathepsin S activity was reported to be correlated with ageing of the brain. As such, reduced levels of Cathepsin S activity are believed to beneficially counteract these risks. Notably, contemplated compositions have shown remarkable and strong inhibitory effect with regard to BACE 1 inhibition.


Likewise, cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) has been found to be essential to proper CNS function and its role in peripheral tissue and disease is growing. For example, acute CDK5 inhibition has a high potential therapeutic value to prevent neuronal injury in the events of stroke or brain injury, or during high-risk surgeries, such as neurovascular or cardiovascular surgeries, or potentially during prolonged, complicated labors. Pharmacological inhibition of CDK5 has been shown to protect neurons under a range of different stressful conditions and ageing (see e.g., Curr Pharm Des. 2016 ; 22(5): 527-534). Once more, contemplated compositions have shown remarkable, strong, and synergistic inhibitory effect with regard to CDK5 inhibition.


In still other example, Janus kinases 1, 2, and 3 (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3) are implicated in the regulation of cell cycle and cancer, presumably via NF-kB activation (see e.g., Cells 2020, 9, 1451). Moreover, small-molecule drugs that inhibit Janus kinases (JAK1-3) were essential signaling mediators downstream of many proinflammatory cytokines and have gained traction as safe and efficacious options for immune-mediated disorders. Not surprisingly, inhibition of JAKs has emerged as leading potential treatment of inflammation-driven pathologies like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease, as well as cardiovascular disease. Notably, contemplated compositions have shown remarkable, strong, and synergistic inhibitory effect with regard to JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3 inhibition (especially at high concentrations).


In still further examples, inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) has emerged as a new treatment strategy for immune support, and particularly in the reversion of tumor-mediated immune suppression (see e.g., Cancer Res. 2017 December 15; 77(24): 6795-6811). Similarly, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-2 (IDO2) has been implicated more recently in cancer, inflammation and immune control, and significant resources have been expended to identify IDO2 specific inhibitors. Increases in IDO1 and IDO2 activity have also been observed as a function of ageing (e.g., Immunity & Ageing 2011, 8:9), along with age related increase in inflammation, autoimmune disorders and malignancies. Remarkably, and as is shown in more detail below, contemplated compositions have shown strong inhibitory effect with regard to IDO1 and IDO2 inhibition.


With respect to energy metabolism, NAMPT and CD38 are known to modulate NAD+ in cells and as such are thought to be essential in maintaining and supporting of cellular energy and proper metabolic function. Indeed, overactivity of CD38 has been reported to increase with senescence (see e.g., Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019 May 28; 513(2): 486-493), cancer and ageing diseases (e.g., Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018 April ; 39(4): 424-436), immunomodulation and metabolic diseases (see e.g., FIMMU May 2019, Vol. 10, Article 1187). On that backdrop, inhibition of CD38 is believed to reduce or even prevent diseases associated with CD38 overactivity. On the other hand, nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) mediates the rate-limiting step of the NAD salvage pathway that maintains cellular bioenergetics and provides a necessary substrate for functions essential to cells, and especially rapidly proliferating cancer cells. Once more, contemplated compositions have shown strong and synergistic inhibitory effect with regard to CD38 inhibition, and strong inhibition with respect to NAMPT activity.


Moreover, overactivity of CD39 and CD73 have been reported to contribute to immune suppression, suppression of checkpoint inhibition in tumors, and other aspect of immune regulation (see e.g., FIMMU June 2017, Volume 8, Article 727; Immunol Rev. 2017 March; 276(1): 121-144). In addition, centenarians showed a significantly lower expression of CD39 and CD73 as compared to younger individuals (here: octogenarians), suggesting that the levels of CD39 as well as CD73 mRNA could be a hallmark of successful human ageing. Viewed from a different perspective, aging is associated with a decline in immune function and so contributes to the increased susceptibility to infectious diseases and higher incidence of malignant disease. Therefore, lower levels of CD39 activity are thought to be directly associated with healthy aging and longevity. Remarkably, contemplated compositions had a significant and synergistic effect in the inhibition of CD73 and a profound inhibitory effect on the activity of CD39 as is shown in more detail below. Likewise, CD47 inhibition was shown to lead to stimulation of phagocytosis of cancer cells and CD47 blockade not only enhanced the function of innate immune cells but also linked to adaptive immune responses (see e.g., Cell Reports 31,107494 Apr. 14, 2020). Notably, contemplated compositions had a significant inhibitory effect in the inhibition of CD47 as is shown in further detail below.


In yet other examples, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has been reported as a contributor to plasma cholesterol levels, and inhibitors targeting PCSK9 have reduced plasma cholesterol in human. Once more, and as shown in more detail below, contemplated compositions had a significant and synergistic effect in the inhibition of PCSK9.


Additionally, the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway is a major regulator of cytoprotective responses to endogenous and exogenous stresses caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Nrf2 activates expression of a variety of genes encoding stress response proteins. Inhibitors of Keap1-Nrf2 binding are therefore thought to increase expression of stress response related proteins. Remarkably, and as shown in more detail below, contemplated compositions had a significant and effect in the inhibition of Keap1-Nrf2 binding (and as such increase availability of Nrf2).


Finally, the inventor also discovered that contemplated compositions also had inhibitory effect in ACE2-Spike protein binding, which is implicated in viral propagation of corona viruses, and especially Sars-CoV2. As will be readily appreciated, contemplated compositions may therefore provide at least some protective effect against corona viruses, and especially Sars-CoV2.


Based on his extensive research, the inventor has now discovered that specific blends of selected plant materials common in the Mediterranean diet can be prepared that mimic the benefits of the Mediterranean diet as evidenced in the modulation of biomarkers. Preferably, such blends are combinations of colored plant materials that belong to a number (e.g., at least two, at least three, or at least four) of different color groups, and particularly plant materials having a red color, green color, orange/yellow color, and/or purple/blue color. For example, in one embodiment of contemplated compositions, polyphenol-containing products/extracts were obtained from red colored source materials that included an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, tomato powder, and beet root; from green colored source materials that included an olive extract, rosemary extract, green coffee bean extract, and kale; from orange/yellow colored source materials that included an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and carrot; and from purple/blue colored source materials that included a grape extract, a blueberry extract, currant, and elderberry, and the particular ingredients and proportions are described in more detail below. Viewed from a different perspective, contemplated compositions will therefore include a large number of polyphenols that below to at least two, or at least three, or at least four different polyphenolic classes, including organic acids, phenolics, flavonols, flavanols, anthocyanins, chlorogenic acids, betacyanins, etc. As will be readily appreciated, the particular choice of a plant material will depend on the desired (polyphenolic) component in the plant material and its effect on a particular biological system and/or signaling pathway.


Of course, it should also be appreciated that the plant materials may be provided in various forms, including whole plant materials or portions thereof (e.g., root, fruit, leaves, etc.) in fresh or dried form, juices or macerates from plant materials or portions thereof in fresh or dried form, and aqueous or aqueous/alcoholic extracts and chromatographic fractions of the aforementioned plant materials. Still further, it should be noted that one or more polyphenols of the plant materials may even be provided as purified (natural isolated or synthetic) chemical entities, typically with a chemical purity of at least 90%, or at least 95%, or at least 98%, or at least 99%. However, it should be recognized that in most embodiments the plant materials will be complex mixtures to provide a combination of desired biological effects on a number of distinct molecular entities (e.g., enzymes, receptors, ion channels) where at least some of the biological effects (e.g., at least one, or at least two, or at least three, etc.) are synergistic. Moreover, it is contemplated that the biological effects on the particular molecular entities will also be complementary in biological function. Therefore, and based on the testing and desired targets as described in more detail below, it should be appreciated that the compositions of the inventive subject matter may be formulated to meet a particular need. However, in especially preferred aspects contemplated compositions will inhibit multiple targets (e.g., at least two, at least three, at least four, etc.) in multiple and distinct (e.g., at least two, at least three, at least four, etc.) signaling pathways.


Consequently, and viewed from a different perspective, it should be appreciated that the mechanism of action of contemplated compositions is not limited to a single specific function (e.g., antioxidant) or limited to a specific chemical category (e.g., vitamins), but in fact complementarily and synergistically provides multiple biological activities across distinct metabolic and signaling pathways. As such, contemplated compositions and methods target a variety of biological systems, including energy metabolism, immune function, neural and CNS function, cardiac function, inflammation, etc. Notably, and as is described in more detail below, the compositions contemplated herein also affected a number of biomarkers associated with longevity (e.g., in blue zone populations such as Mediterranean population, Okinawan population, etc.) In addition, it is contemplated that the plant materials will also provide a variety of micro-nutrients to assist or complement the functions of the polyphenols and other colored pigments present in the compositions.


Consequently, it should be appreciated that the compositions contemplated herein may be advantageously used as a stand-alone product to support various aspects of health and healthy ageing such as support of proper immune function, support to reduce inflammation, support of normal NAD+ levels, support of cardiac health. In this context, it should be noted that the term “support” when used in conjunction with a physiological function or condition is intended to mean prevent decline of one or more components or activities of the component(s) associated with the physiological function or condition, at least partially reverse decline of one or more components or activities of the component(s) associated with the physiological function or condition, maintain normal function of one or more components or activities of the component(s) associated with the physiological function or condition, prevent abnormal overactivity (or over-expression) of one or more components associated with the physiological function or condition, and/or at least partially reverse abnormal overactivity (or over-expression) of one or more components associated with the physiological function or condition. Alternatively, the compositions contemplated herein may also be combined with other nutritional supplements and/or vitamins to provide beneficial effects otherwise not obtainable with such supplements or vitamins. In this context, it should be appreciated that most, if not all of the biomarkers tested herein were not substantially modulated by multivitamin compositions as is shown in more detail below. Thus, it should be recognized that the compositions resented herein present a new and different class of health support with a variety of beneficial effects that reach beyond the benefits of a multivitamin formulation.


In further contemplated aspects of the inventive subject matter it should be appreciated that the compositions presented herein may be formulated in a variety of forms, and particularly preferred formulations include those in combination with a nutritionally or pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, most preferably for oral administration (however, parenteral administration is also expressly contemplated). Therefore, contemplated compositions can be formulated as solid or a liquid product. For example, where contemplated compositions are formulated as a solid product, suitable product forms include single dosage unit formulations such as capsules, tablets, and powders, while other solid formulations include snack bars, gummies, or other edible products onto which the composition is coated (e.g., onto cereal) or into which the composition is mixed or layered (e.g., into chewing gum). In another examples, where contemplated compositions are formulated as a liquid product, suitable product forms include flavored and/or carbonated beverages (e.g., tea, juice), functional beverages (e.g., sports or energy drinks) or infusions, or liquid dairy product (e.g., yoghourt, kefir).


Therefore, contemplated compositions may be provided in bulk, as part of an edible or drinkable product, and/or provided in single dosage units for consumption. Most typically, the daily dosage for contemplated compositions (excluding the carrier) is preferably at least 10 mg, or at least 100 mg, or at least 200 mg, or at least 300 mg, or at least 400 mg, or at least 500 mg, or at least 750 mg, or at least 1,000 mg, or at least 1,500 mg. For example, suitable dosages will be between 10-100 mg, or between 100-200 mg, or between 200-400 mg, or between 300-600 mg, or between 400-800 mg, or between 600-1,000 mg, or between 1,000-2,000 mg.


As will be readily appreciated, contemplated compositions may further be combined with one or more additional ingredients to impart further desirable functionalities, and suitable additional ingredients include vitamins (e.g., single vitamins, or vitamin blends such as multivitamin blends), dietary trace elements or minerals (e.g., individual elements or minerals, or mixtures of multiple elements or minerals in various forms), various specialty compounds and mixtures (e.g., compositions comprising nicotinamide riboside, prebiotics, human milk oligosaccharides), and/or one or more probiotic microorganisms (e.g., Lactobacillus spec., Bifidobacterium spec., Leukonostoc spec., Saccharomyces boulardii, etc.).


Of course, it should be recognized that the compositions according to the inventive subject matter may be administered not only to a human, but also to other non-human mammals, and especially livestock and companion animals (e.g., dogs, cats, horses). Administration will typically be between once daily and three times daily (and in some cases even more) over a period of at least two days, three days, five days, 1 week, 2-4 weeks, 1-3 months, and even longer. Most typically, administration can be performed for a period sufficient to provide at least symptomatic relief of a condition (e.g., pain and swelling associated with inflammation, low energy level, frequent infections, etc.), or prophylactically to avoid or help reduce severity of a health condition.


EXAMPLES

Representative Composition:


Unless indicated otherwise, all tests were performed with a defined mixture of selected polyphenol-containing products/extracts common to the Mediterranean diet. The polyphenol-containing products/extracts were obtained from source materials characterized by color as follows: Red group: apple extract, pomegranate extract, tomato powder, and beet root; Green group: olive extract, rosemary extract, green coffee bean extract, and kale; Orange/yellow group: onion extract, ginger extract, grapefruit extract, and carrot; and Purple/blue group: grape extract, blueberry extract, currant, and elderberry. Corn starch, silica, and sunflower lecithin were used as processing aids. Relative proportions are shown in Table 1 below.














TABLE 1





Ingredient
Wt %
Part
Solvent
Standardized to
State




















Grape Extract
15.75
Whole fruit
Ethanol
Min 50% total
Powdered






Proanthocyanidins



Apple Extract
10.00
Whole fruit
Ethanol/Water
70% Polyphenols
Powdered


Ginger Extract
10.00
Root
Ethanol/
5% Gingerol
Powdered





Water




Onion Extract
10.00
Root bulb
Ethanol/
30% Quercetin
Powdered





Water




Pomegranate Extract
10.00
Whole fruit
Ethanol
40% Punicalagins
Powdered


Green Coffee Bean
7.50
Seed
Ethanol/Water
50% Chlorogenic
Powdered


Extract



Acids



Rosemary Extract
7.50
Leaves
Ethanol/
15% Rosmarinic Acid
Powdered





Water




Olive Extract
6.38
Whole fruit
Water
12% Hydroxytyrosol
Powdered


Maltodextrin
3.19
—/—
—/—
—/—
Powdered


Blueberry Extract
2.50
Whole fruit
Ethanol/Water
12% Anthocyanins
Powdered


Grapefruit Extract
2.50
Whole fruit
Ethanol/Water
90% Naringin
Powdered


Kale
2.50
Leaves
None
—/—
Powdered


Beet Root
2.45
Root
None
—/—
Powdered


Carrot
2.45
Root
None
—/—
Powdered


Black Currant
2.43
Whole fruit
None
—/—
Powdered


Elderberry
2.43
Whole fruit
None
—/—
Powdered


Tomato
1.85
Whole fruit
None
—/—
Powdered


Corn Starch
0.31
—/—
—/—
—/—
Powdered


Silica
0.25
—/—
—/—
—/—
Powdered


Sunflower Lecithin
0.03
—/—
—/—
—/—
Powdered









Phytochemical HPLC/MS/MS analysis: An HPLC/MS compositional analysis of the exemplary composition above revealed the following ingredients and proportions where the columns in each of Tables 2-8 indicate the analyte ID (col.1), chemical entity (col.2), M-H (col.3), RT (col.4), peak intensity (col.5), and MS/MS fragments (col.6):














TABLE 2





Ingredient
Wt %
Part
Solvent
Standardized to
State







Grape Extract
15.75
Whole fruit
Ethanol
Min 50% total
Powdered






Proanthocyanidins



Apple Extract
10.00
Whole fruit
Ethanol/Water
70% Polyphenols
Powdered


Ginger Extract
10.00
Root
Ethanol/Water
5% Gingerol
Powdered


Onion Extract
10.00
Root bulb
Ethanol/Water
30% Quercetin
Powdered


Pomegranate Extract
10.00
Whole fruit
Ethanol
40% Punicalagins
Powdered


Green Coffee Bean
 7.50
Seed
Ethanol/Water
50% Chlorogenic
Powdered


Extract



Acids



Rosemary Extract
 7.50
Leaves
Ethanol/Water
15% Rosmarinic Acid
Powdered


Olive Extract
 6.38
Whole fruit
Water
12% Hydroxytyrosol
Powdered


Maltodextrin
 3.19
−/−
−/−
−/−
Powdered


Blueberry Extract
 2.50
Whole fruit
Ethanol/Water
12% Anthocyanins
Powdered


Grapefruit Extract
 2.50
Whole fruit
Ethanol/Water
90% Naringin
Powdered


Kale
 2.50
Leaves
None
−/−
Powdered


Beet Root
 2.45
Root
None
−/−
Powdered


Carrot
 2.45
Root
None
−/−
Powdered


Black Currant
 2.43
Whole fruit
None
−/−
Powdered


Elderberry
 2.43
Whole fruit
None
−/−
Powdered


Tomato
 1.85
Whole fruit
None
−/−
Powdered


Corn Starch
 0.31
−/−
−/−
−/−
Powdered


Silica
 0.25
−/−
−/−
−/−
Powdered


Sunflower Lecithin
 0.03
−/−
−/−
−/−
Powdered









Phytochemical HPLC/MS/MS analysis: An HPLC/MS compositional analysis of the exemplary composition above revealed the following ingredients and proportions where the columns in each of Tables 2-8 indicate the analyte ID (col.1), chemical entity (col.2), M-H (col.3), RT (col.4), peak intensity (col.5), and MS/MS fragments (col.6):









TABLE 3





Organic acids




















1
Citric acid
191.0186
2.9
5.25E+08
102, 111, 129, 173


2
Malic acid
133.0130
2.2
1.26E+08
71, 89, 115


3
Glucaric acid
209.0291
1.7
8.68E+08
133, 147, 191


4
Gluconic acid
195.0504
1.7
4.44E+08
99, 129, 159, 177


5
hydroxy jasmonic acid-O-glucoside
387.1668
22.3 
2.23E+08
59, 163, 207


6
Azelaic acid
187.0968
28.3 
1.56E+07
125, 169


5
Arabinonic acid
165.0395
1.7
1.96E+08
129, 147, 165
















TABLE 4





Phenolics




















 7
Coumaric acid
163.0389
24.3 
9.19E+06
119, 147


 8
Coumaric aicd-derv
295.0460
21.1 
2.45E+06
119, 163


 9
Quinic acid-I
191.0553
1.8
4.76E+08
173


10
Quinic acid-II
191.0553
20.1 
2.40E+08
173


11
Caffeic acid
179.0341
21.4 
1.54E+08
135


12
Caffeic acid-hexose-I
341.0869
16.6 
5.02E+06
135, 161, 179


13
Caffeic acid-hexose-II
341.0869
18.5 
1.28E+07
135, 161, 179


14
Caffeic acid-hexose-III
341.0869
19.6 
1.02E+07
135, 179


15
Caffeic acid-hexose-IV
341.0869
20.0 
1.61E+07
135, 161, 179


16
Ferulic acid
193.0498
25.6 
4.32E+06
134.04, 149.06, 178.03


17
Ferulic acid-hexose-I
355.1028
21.7 
1.97E+07
175


18
Ferulic acid-hexose-I
355.1028
22.5 
5.63E+06



19
Ferulic acid-hexose-I
355.1028
23.3 
6.47E+06
134, 149, 175


20
Ferulic acid-hexose-I
355.1028
24.9 
3.24E+06
193


21
Ferulic acid-hexose-I
355.1028
25.9 
4.32E+06
193


22
3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid
153.0188
10.2 
1.23E+07
109


23
Gallic acid
169.0132
5.3
6.41E+07
125


24
Rosmaric acid
359.0772
28.8 
1.18E+09
135, 131, 179, 197


25
Rosmaric acid dimer
719.1618
28.8 
5.48E+08
135, 161, 179, 197


26
Salvianic acid A
197.0447
9.2
7.12E+07
123, 135, 179, 180


27
Ethyl gallate
197.0449
24.3 
1.83E+07
125, 151, 169


28
Ellagic acid
300.9994
25.8 
1.20E+08
229, 257, 283


29
Ellagic acid glucoside
463.0529
22.9 
5.69E+05
125, 169, 300.99, 463


30
Galloyl-HHDP-glucoside
633.0737
22.7 
6.10E+07
125, 169, 193, 275, 300.99


31
Digalloyl-HHDP-glucoside
785.0867
22.3 
1.92E+06
125, 169, 275, 300.99


32
3-Galloylquinic acid
343.0673
5.9
1.70E+06
169, 191



(Theogallin)






33
3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic
153.0183
10.2 
1.23E+07
96, 109


34
3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic
153.0545
10.3 
3.62E+08
109, 123, 153.0182


35
2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic
153.0183
23.8 
8.71E+06
109


36
2-Hydroxybenzoic acid
137.0232
15.0 
1.10E+07
93
















TABLE 5





Flavonoids




















37
Naringenin
 271.0604
34.4
2.96E+07
119, 151, 227, 271


38
Naringenin-glucoside
 433.1149
28.0
4.14E+06
151, 271


39
Naringenin-rhamnoglucoside
 579.1722
27.5
1.13E+09
151, 271, 549


40
Naringenin-rhamnoglucoside dimer
1159.3540
27.5
5.66E+07
151, 271, 459


41
Myricetin
 317.0503
29.0
1.09E+07
137, 151, 178


42
Myricetin 3-rhamnoside
 463.0894
25.8
5.61E+06
316, 317


43
Myricetin 3-glucoside I
 479.0839
24.3
4.59E+06
316, 317


44
Myricetin 3-rhamnoside II
 479.0839
24.5
4.57E+06
316, 317


45
Phloretin
 273.0769
34.5
2.41E+08
167


46
Phloretin -glucoside
 435.1298
29.0
2.85E+08
167, 273


47
Phloretin-arabinose-glucoside
 567.1733
27.5
3.28E+08
167, 273


48
Phloretin-diglucoside
 597.1831
26.8
7.70E+06
167, 273


49
Apigenin
 269.0460
34.4
4.46E+07
151


50
Apigenin glucoside
 431.0985
27.8
1.36E+07
268, 269


51
Apigenin rhamnoside glucoside
 577.1575
27.4
8.96E+07
269


52
Apigenin rhamnoside glucoside der
 623.1635
27.4
7.88E+06
269, 577


53
Apigenin rhamnoside glucoside dimer
1155.3230
27.4
1.41E+06
269, 577


54
Quercetin
 301.0348
32.1
1.89E+09
151, 179, 273, 301


55
Quercetin dimer
 603.0795
32.1
3.94E+08
151, 178, 301


56
Quercetin galactoside
 463.0874
24.6
1.00E+07
301


57
Quercetin glucoside-1
 463.0874
25.9
2.98E+07
151, 300, 301


58
Quercetin glucoside-2
 463.0874
26.1
7.16E+07
151, 300, 301


59
Quercetin-diglucoside
 625.1400
23.8
8.83E+05
151, 178, 301, 463


60
Quercetin-rutinoside or Rutin
 609.1478
25.5
3.37E+07
300, 301


61
Luteolin
 285.0407
31.9
4.20E+07
133.03, 199.04,







217.05, 241


62
Luteolin glucoside 1
 447.0938
26.2
4.58E+06
284, 285


63
Luteolin glucoside 2
 447.0938
24.6
1.50E+07
284, 285


64
Catechin-1
 289.0704
20.2
5.97E+08
151, 179, 205, 245


65
Catechin-2
 289.0704
22.7
8.47E+08



66
Proanthocyanidin B1
 577.1364
22.0
4.06E+08
125, 289, 407


67
Proanthocyanidin B2
 577.1364
18.9
2.14E+08
125, 289, 407


68
Isorhamnetin
 315.0503
35.4
2.66E+08
300, 315


69
Isorhamnetin glucoside
 477.1030
26.7
1.11E+08
119, 151, 299,







314, 315


70
Isorhamnetin diglucoside-1
 639.1563
27.4
1.11E+06
151, 285, 313, 315,







476, 477, 639


71
Isorhamnetin-rhamnosyl-glucoside
 623.1939
26.1
6.63E+06
315


72
Kaempferol
 285.0397
35.0
1.27E+08
125.02, 244, 257, 268


73
Kaempferol glucoside-1
 447.0938
26.9
4.02E+06



74
Kaempferol glucoside-2
 447.0938
27.4
1.98E+07



75
Kaempferol glucoside-3
 447.0938
27.6
1.04E+07



76
Kaempferol glucoside-4
 447.0938
27.9
4.47E+06



77
Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside
 593.1521
25.6
1.68E+07
285


78
Kampferol 3-
 755.2060
25.9
1.23E+06
285



(6-glucosylglucoside)







7-rhamnoside






79
wogonin
 283.0616
41.2
1.42E+08
268, 283
















TABLE 6





Anthocyanin




















 80
Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside
449.1073
21.1
1.67E+07
287


 81
Cyanidin derv
463.0874
27.7
3.56E+05
287


 82
Cyanidin derv
463.0874
29.1
1.97E+07
287


 83
Cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside
595.1658
25.6
8.57E+05
287, 449


 84
Cyanidin 3-sambubioside
581.1500
21.1
5.95E+06
287


 85
Pelargonidin
271.0600
24.5
2.10E+06
271


 86
Pelargonidin-glucoside
433.1131
27.9
7.85E+05
271


 87
Pelargonidin-glucoside derv
639.1710
31.4
5.30E+05
175, 207, 271


 88
Malvidin
331.0809
26.7
2.27E+06
316


 89
Malvidin arabinoside
463.1237
23.0
8.98E+06
331


 90
Malvidin-feruloyl-arabinoside
639.1710
28.1
7.34E+05
331


 91
Delphinidin
303.0496
32.2
2.73E+07
303


 92
Delphinidin 3-glucoside
465.1028
20.1
6.49E+06
303, 385


 93
Delphinidin 3-rutinoside
611.1603
25.5
1.30E+06
303


 94
Delphinidin-3-arabinoside- I
435.0922
20.7
2.06E+06
303


 95
Petunidin
317.0655
35.5
2.77E+06
317


 96
Petunidin 3-glucoside
479.1186
26.7
1.32E+07
317


 97
Petunidin 3-rutinoside
625.1765
26.1
5.63E+05
317


 98
Petunidin derv
463.0874
26.9
4.03E+05
317


 99
Peonidin
301.0709
34.8
1.63E+06
286


100
Peonidin-glucoside-I
463.1240
26.9
2.77E+06
301


101
Peonidin-glucoside II
463.1240
28.3
6.98E+06
301


102
Peonidin-rutinoside
609.1814
27.6
1.52E+06
301


103
Peonidin-feruloyl-glucoside
639.1710
31.7
1.88E+06
177, 301
















TABLE 7





Chlorogenic acids




















104
3-Caffeoylquinic acid
353.0875
14.3
2.70E+08
135, 179, 191


105
5-Caffeoylquinic acid
353.0875
20.1
8.52E+08
179, 191


106
4-Caffeoylquinic acid
353.0875
21.1
5.09E+08
135, 173, 179, 191


107
3-Caffeoylquinic acid dimer
707.1830
14.3
1.87E+07
135, 179, 191,353


108
5-Caffeoylquinic acid dimer
707.1833
20.1
9.23E+08
191, 353


109
4-Caffeoylquinic acid dimer
707.1834
21.1
1.95E+08
135, 173, 179, 191, 353


110
3-Caffeoylshikimic acid
335.0770
24.2
3.17E+07
135, 161, 173, 179


111
4-Caffeoylshikimic acid
335.0770
24.5
1.62E+08
135, 161


112
5-Caffeoylshikimic acid
335.0770
25.0
1.53E+08
161


113
3,4-Dicaffeoylshikimic acid
497.1091
29.5
0



114
3,5-Dicaffeoylshikimic acid
497.1091
32.0
9.10E+07
161, 179 335


115
4,5-Dicaffeoylshikimic acid
497.1091
32.7
6.97E+06
135, 161, 179, 335


116
3-Feruloylquinic acid
367.1032
20.7
1.13E+08
134, 193


117
5-Feruloylquinic acid
367.1032
23.6
3.76E+08
163, 191


118
4-Feruloylquinic acid
367.1035
23.8
1.66E+08
173, 193


119
3-Feruloylquinic acid dimer
735.2144
20.7
7.14E+05



120
5-Feruloylquinic acid dimer
735.2144
23.6
1.03E+08
173, 191, 367


121
4-Feruloylquinic acid dimer
735.2144
23.8
4.17E+06
173, 193, 367


122
3-Coumaroylquinic acid
337.0932
19.0
2.68E+07
119, 163


123
4-Coumaroylquinic acid
337.0933
22.6
9.95E+07
191


124
5-Coumaroylquinic acid
337.0933
23.0
4.09E+08
163, 173


125
3-Coumaroylquinic acid dimer
675.1941
19.0
0



126
4-Coumaroylquinic acid dimer
675.1941
22.6
3.00E+06
191


127
5-Coumaroylquinic acid dimer
675.1941
23.0
1.53E+07
163, 173


128
3,4-Dicaffeoyl quinic acid
515.1189
27.1
2.63E+08
135, 161, 173, 179, 191, 353


129
3,5-Dicaffeoyl quinic acid
515.1190
27.6
1.79E+08
135, 179, 191, 353


130
4,5-Dicaffeoyl quinic acid
515.1195
28.3
3.37E+08
135, 173, 179, 191, 353


131
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-1
275.1135
14.9
2.70E+05
101, 173, 181


132
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-2
275.1135
15.8
5.75E+05
101, 181, 191


133
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-3
275.1135
21.0
1.17E+06
101, 173


134
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-4
275.1135
21.4
2.26E+06
101, 173


135
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-5
275.1135
23.2
3.27E+05
93, 101, 173, 181, 191


136
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-6
275.1135
23.4
5.25E+05
101, 173


137
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-7
275.1135
30.4
5.22E+06
93, 101, 173, 181, 191


138
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-8
275.1135
30.6
1.18E+06
101


139
Valeroylquinic acid isomer-9
275.1135
31.7
1.98E+06
101, 173


140
Caffeoylvaleroylquinic acid isomer 1
437.1451
29.7
3.55E+06
161, 173, 179, 275


141
Caffeoylvaleroylquinic acid isomer 2
437.1451
29.8
6.88E+06
161, 173, 179, 275


142
Caffeoylvaleroylquinic acid isomer 3
437.1451
30.4
2.46E+06
161, 173, 179, 275


143
Caffeoylvaleroylquinic acid isomer 4
437.1451
30.6
5.13E+06
173, 275


144
Caffeoylvaleroylquinic acid isomer 5
437.1451
31.7
6.96E+06
173, 275


145
Quinic acid-glucoside-R*-1
481.2442
24.8
3.81E+07
161, 197, 301


146
Quinic acid-glucoside-R*-2
481.2442
25.3
1.22E+08
161, 197, 301


147
Valeroylquinic acid glucoside-R*-1
565.3023
33.3
1.18E+07
301, 463, 481


148
Valeroylquinic acid dig1ucoside-R*-1
727.3545
26.6
3.83E+06
161, 301, 323, 481, 643


149
Valeroylquinic acid dig1ucoside-R*-2
727.3545
30.4
1.89E+06
205, 361, 625, 643


150
Valeroylquinic acid dig1ucoside-R*-3
727.3545
30.8
3.05E+07
481, 523, 625, 643
















TABLE 8





Betacyanin



















151
Betanin
551.1517
15.6
2.19E+04


152
Isobetanin
551.1517
19.7
1.54E+04
















TABLE 9





Amino acids, alkaloids & other compounds




















153
Glycerophosphocholine
258.1098
1.7
6.17E+07
104


154
Adenosine
268.1040
4.1
4.68E+06
136


155
Phenylalanine
166.0861
6.8
1.41E+07
120


156
Tiyptophan
205.0973
14.5 
6.28E+06
146, 188


157
Tyrosine
182.0812
3.7
9.16E+06
119, 123,







136, 147, 165


158
Dopamine
154.0858
2.7
8.64E+05
113, 137


159
Trigonellin
138.0548
1.8
2.05E+08
94


160
Caffeine
195.0875
20.1 
4.94E+07
138


161
Xanthine
151.0256
3.1
7.74E+05
109









Biological activity of the composition was tested for inhibition of various target entities that are central to various pathways associated with health and healthy ageing, and exemplary activity results are presented below. More specifically, the inventor tested the composition for inhibitory activity of human ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT1, BACE1, Cathepsin S, CDK5, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, CD38, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, CD39, and CD73, and for Keap/Nrf2 binding inhibition and ACE2-Spike binding inhibition.


ARG1 and ARG2:


In the following experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on ARG1 and ARG2. Reagents used are shown in the Tables 9-10 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (nor-NOHA is reference compound).













TABLE 10






Form

Dissolving



Compound
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend
powder
1% (w/v)
70%
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


lot #33890000X11020


EtOH



nor-NOHA*
powder
10 mM
DMSO
0.001, 0.01 and 0.1 μM





















TABLE 11









Concentration




Enzyme
Lot #
(ng/well)
Substrate









ARG1
150825
100
Thioarginine (225 μM)



ARG2
160726-1
 20
Thioarginine (225 μM)










Assay conditions: The assay was performed using human recombinant ARG1 or ARG2 as enzymes and thioarginine as substrate. The UV absorbance at 412 nm was correlated with the amount of reaction product of ARG1/ARG2. The test sample (HP Color Blend) was dissolved to 1% (w/v) with 70% (w/v) EtOH and filtered through 0.22 μm; nor-NOHA was dissolved in 100% (w/v) DMSO to 10 mM. 5 μl of 20× sample solutions were added to 90 μl of substrate, and reactions were started by the addition of 5 μl of 20× ARG1/ARG2 solutions. For the negative control (Blank), 5 μl of the assay buffer was added instead of the ARG1/ARG2. The resulting 100 μl reaction mixture contained the indicated amount of the samples, 225 μM thioarginine, the detection reagent, and 30 nM ARG1 or 5 nM ARG2 in 1× ARG Assay Buffer. All reactions were conducted at room temperature and incubated for 30 minutes, ensuring that all wells, containing either samples or controls, contained 0.7% (v/v) EtOH final concentration to discard any solvent effect. UV absorbance readings were done at times 0 and 30 minutes to get net values. Absorbance was measured using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: Experiment was performed in duplicate at each concentration. The data were analyzed using the software GraphPad Prism. In the absence of the compound, the net absorbance (At) in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of ARG1/ARG2, the net absorbance (Ab) in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=[(A−Ab)/(At−Ab)]×100, where A=the absorbance in the presence of the compound. The percent inhibition was calculated according to the following equation: % inhibition=100−% activity.


Results: Notably, significant inhibitory activity was found for both ARG-1 and ARG-2 across all tested concentrations as is shown in Tables 11-12 below. As can be readily seen from the results, inhibition relative to the reference inhibitor was significant and not specific towards one or the other of ARG-1 and ARG-2 as is also seen from Table 13. Results are also depicted in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 for ARG-1 and ARG-2, respectively.












TABLE 12








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
ARG-1












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep.2
Rep. 1
Rep.2
Inhibition (%)





No compound
0.76
0.75
101
 99



HP Color Blend, 0.0004%
0.64
0.62
 85
 82
17


HP Color Blend, 0.002%
0.56
0.55
 74
 74
26


HP Color Blend, 0.01%
0.51
0.50
 68
 66
33


nor-NOHA, 0.001 μM
0.74
0.77
 99
102
 0


nor-NOHA, 0.01 μM
0.59
0.59
 79
 78
22


nor-NOHA, 0.1 μM
0.23
0.24
 31
 31
69


Blank
0.00
0.00



















TABLE 13








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
ARG-2












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Inhibition (%)





No compound
1.01
0.93
104
96



HP Color Blend, 0.0004%
0.72
0.72
 74
74
26


HP Color Blend, 0.002%
0.59
0.64
 60
66
37


HP Color Blend, 0.01%
0.63
0.59
 65
60
38


nor-NOHA, 0.001 μM
0.78
0.82
 81
84
17


nor-NOHA, 0.01 μM
0.56
0.60
 57
62
41


nor-NOHA, 0.1 μM
0.19
0.19
 19
19
81


Blank
0.00
0.00
 0
 0



















TABLE 14










Inhibition (%)











Condition
ARG1
ARG2







HP Color Blend, 0.0004%
17
26



HP Color Blend, 0.002%
26
37



HP Color Blend, 0.01%
33
38



nor-NOHA, 0.001 μM
 0
17



nor-NOHA, 0.01 μM
22
41



nor-NOHA, 0.1 μM
69
81











SIRT1:


In the following experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on SIRT1. Reagents used are shown in Tables 14-15 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (Suramin was used as reference compound).














TABLE 15





Compound
Compound
Stock
Dissolving

Intermediate


I.D.
Supplied
Concentration
Solvent
Test Range
Dilution







HP Color Blend
Solid
1% (w/v)
70%
0.0004%, 0.002%, 0.01%
10% DMSO in


lot #33890000X11020


EtOH

HDAC Assay







Buffer


Suramin*
Solid
10 mM
DMSO
0.01 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM
10% DMSO in







HDAC Assay







Buffer




















TABLE 16







Enzyme
Enzyme Used



Assay
Catalog #
Lot #
(ng)/Reaction
Substrate







SIRT1
50012
190710
550
10 μM HDAC Substrate 1









Assay Conditions: The sample was dissolved in 70% EtOH. The serial dilution of the compound was first performed in 70% EtOH with the highest concentration at 1%. Each intermediate compound dilution (in 70% EtOH) will then get directly diluted 10× fold into assay buffer for an intermediate dilution of 7% EtOH in HDAC assay buffer and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction so that the final concentration of EtOH is 0.7% in all of reactions.


The enzymatic reactions for the SIRT1 enzyme were conducted in duplicate at 37° C. for 30 minutes in a 50 μl mixture containing SIRT assay buffer, 5 μg BSA, an HDAC substrate (see 2.3.1), a SIRT enzyme, and a test compound. After enzymatic reactions, 50 μl of 2× SIRT Developer was added to each well for the SIRT enzymes and the plate was incubated at room temperature for an additional 15 minutes. Fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation of 360 nm and an emission of 460 nm using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: SIRT activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The fluorescent intensity data were analyzed using the computer software, Graphpad Prism. In the absence of the compound, the fluorescent intensity (Ft) in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of SIRT, the fluorescent intensity (Fb) in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(F−Fb)/(Ft−Fb), where F=the fluorescent intensity in the presence of the compound.


Results: The inhibitory results are shown in the table below. The percent inhibition of the compounds against SIRT1 are summarized. The reference compound and tested composition and HP Color Blend precipitated at the 0.01% intermediate dilution step. FIG. 3 depicts the results in graphic form, and Table 16 provides results in numerical format. As can be readily appreciated, the tested composition had noticeable SIRT1 inhibitory activity.













TABLE 17








SIRT1 Activity














(Fluorescence count)
% Activity
%












Compound I.D.
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Inhibition















No Compound
2394
2429
99
101
0


HP Color Blend,
2407
2382
100
99
1


0.0004%







HP Color Blend,
2199
2200
91
91
9


0.002%







HP Color Blend,
1821
1891
74
77
24


0.01%







Suramin, 0.01 μM
2415
2415
100
100
0


Suramin, 0.1 μM
2074
2082
85
86
14


Suramin, 1 μM
710
702
26
26
74


Background
109
110










Keap/Nrf2:


In a further set of experiments, the inventor investigated whether or not the tested composition was able to interfere with Keap1-Nrf2 binding, and exemplary results are provided below. Reagents used are shown in Table 17 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (reference compound was LDEETGEFL-OH).














TABLE 18






Compound
Stock
Dissolving
Test Range
Intermediate


Compound I.D.
Supplied
Concentration
Solvent
(%)
Dilution







HP Color Blend
Powder
1%
70% Ethanol
0.0004,
7% Ethanol


lot#33890000X11020



0.002,







0.01



Reference
Powder
10 mM
DMSO
0.1, 1, 10,
10% DMSO






100









Assay Conditions: The test compound is diluted in 7% ethanol, and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction so that the final concentration of ethanol is 0.7%. The reference compound is diluted in 10% DMSO, and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction so that the final concentration of DMSO is 1%. The binding reactions were conducted at room temperature for 30 minutes in a 50 μl mixture containing 10mM HEPES, pH7.4, 50 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween20, 0.01% BSA, 100 nM Keap1, 5 nM fluorescence probe and the test compound. Fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation of 475 nm and an emission of 520 nm using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: All of binding assays were performed in 96-well plates in duplicate. Fluorescence intensity is converted to fluorescence anisotropy using the Tecan Magellan6 software. The fluorescence anisotropy data were analyzed using the computer software, Graphpad Prism. The fluorescence anisotropy (FAt) in the sample with KeapI and the probe in each data set was defined as 100% activity. The fluorescence anisotropy (FAb) in the sample with a compound but without KeapI in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent binding efficacy in the presence of the competitor compound was calculated according to the following equation






%





Activity


=


(


F
A

-

F
Ab


)


(


F
At

-

F
Ab


)



×
100

%




where FA=the fluorescence anisotropy in the presence of the compound. The values of % binding were then plotted in a bar graph as shown in FIG. 4, and numerical results are shown in Table 18 below.













TABLE 19








Background
Binding Activity





Fluorescent Polarization
Fluorescent Polarization
Percentage




(mA)
(mA)
Activity
Percentage














Compound
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 2
Repea t2
Repeat 2
Repeat 2
Inhibition





No Compound
18
14
38
40
96
104 
 0


0.0004%
21
22
43
43
92
93
 7


0.002%
38
41
48
50
39
48
56


0.01%
78
76
81
81
16
17
83









As will be readily recognized from the results in the Table above and FIG. 4, the tested composition had appreciable inhibitory activity against Keap1-Nfr2 binding.


ACE2-Spike:


In this series of experiments, the inventor investigated whether contemplated compositions and fractions thereof could reduce binding of SARS-CoV2 spike protein to ACE2, and if vitamins would also have any effect.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 19-21 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (* denotes reference compounds). In this series of experiments, the representative composition as described above was compared against individual color as indicated below and further against a multivitamin formulation as also indicated below. Table 19 denotes the representative composition, Table 20 denotes the color subfractions of the representative composition in which DC-5=Yellow Blend, DC-9=Purple Blend, DC-21-Green Blend, DC-13=Red Blend. Here, the red blend included Apple Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Tomato Powder, Beet; the green blend included Olive Extract, Rosemary Extract, Green Coffee Bean Extract, Kale; the orange/yellow blend included Onion Extract, Ginger Extract, Grapefruit Extract, Carrot; and the purple/blue blend included Grape, Blueberry Extract, Currant, Elderberry as also noted above. Table 21 denotes the multivitamin blend, and Table 22 denotes the ACE2/Spike reagents used.













TABLE 20






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0008, 0.004,


lot#33890000X11020



0.02 and 0.1%












Anti-ACE2*
Powder
1.33
μM
PBS
0.27 μM


Spike S1*
Solution
5.6
μM
PBS
0.01, 0.1















and 1 μM




















TABLE 21






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DC-5
Solid
1% (w/v)
70% (v/v) EtOH
0.0008, 0.004, 0.02






and 0.1%


DC-9
Solid
1% (w/v)
70% (v/v) EtOH
0.0008, 0.004, 0.02






and 0.1%


DC-13
Solid
1% (w/v)
70% (v/v) EtOH
0.0008, 0.004, 0.02






and 0.1%


DC-21
Solid
1% (w/v)
70% (v/v) EtOH
0.0008, 0.004, 0.02






and 0.1%












Anti-ACE2*
Solid
13.3
μM
PBS
0.27 μM


Spike S1*
Solution
5.6
μM
PBS
0.01, 0.1 and 1 μM




















TABLE 22






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DC-TIV-1.0 (Adult
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% (v/v)
0.0008, 0.004,


Centrum Vitamin)


EtOH
0.02 and 0.1%












Anti-ACE2*
Powder
13.3
μM
PBS
0.27 μM


Spike S1*
Solution
5.6
μM
PBS
0.01, 0.1















and 1 μM



















TABLE 23





Component
Catalog #
Lot #
Concentration


















ACE2-His
11003
131001
50 ng/well


Spike S1-Biotin
100679
200326
40 nM









Assay Conditions: Nickel plate was coated at room temperature for 1 hour with 50 μl of 1 μg/ml of ACE2-His and washed and blocked before starting the reaction. 10 μl of compound solutions were incubated with 20 μl of 1× Immune Buffer in ACE2-His-coated assay wells during 30 minutes before starting the reaction by the addition of 20 μl of 5 μg/ml Spike S1-Spike. Controls with the same concentration of solvent (EtOH) were included in the study. Reaction was progressed for 1 hour at room temperature. Then, wells were washed three times with 1× Immune Buffer and blocked with Blocking Buffer 2 for 10 minutes. 100 μl of Streptavidin-HRP was added to all wells and incubated for 1 hour. Lastly, plate was emptied, washed three times and blocked before the addition of 100 μl of freshly prepared HRP chemiluminescent substrates to every well. Immediately, the luminescence of the samples was measured in a BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: The luminescence data were analyzed and compared. In the absence of the compound, the intensity (Ce) in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of enzyme, the intensity (C0) in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(C−C0)/(Ce-C0), where C=the luminescence in the presence of the compound.


Results for the representative composition are shown in Table 23 and FIG. 5, while results for the multivitamin formulation are shown in Table 24 and FIG. 6. Results for the colored blends are shown in Table 25 and FIG. 7. As can be readily seen from the data in Tables 23-25 and FIGS. 5-7, the representative composition showed synergistic inhibition of ACE2-Spike S1 binding, particularly at lower concentrations, whereas the multivitamin formulation had no significant inhibitory effect. Moreover, selected DC-13 and DC9 also had some inhibitory effect per se.












TABLE 24








Luminescence
Activity (%)
Inh.












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound (0% EtOH)
73041
72023
101
99
0


#33890000X11020, 0.0008%
69278
67571
96
93
6


(0.06% EtOH)







#33890000X11020, 0.004%
61074
58147
84
80
18


(0.3% EtOH)







#33890000X11020, 0.02%
39077
40075
54
55
45


(1.5% EtOH)







#33890000X11020, 0.1%
4531
4376
6
6
94


(7% EtOH)







0.06% EtOH control
69515
66778
96
92
6


0.3% EtOH control
73813
68546
102
95
2


1.5% EtOH control
65414
71374
90
98
6


7% EtOH control
69262
72935
95
101
2


Anti-ACE2, 0.27 μM
44726
43081
62
59
40


Spike-Fc, 0.01 μM
65506
67497
90
93
8


Spike-Fc, 0.1 μM
44243
48002
61
66
36


Spike-Fc, 1 μM
11079
13329
15
18
83


Blank
53
59
0
0
100



















TABLE 25








Luminescence
Activity (%)
Inh.












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound (0% EtOH)
69783
68734
101
99
0


DC-TIV-1.0, 0.0008%
68843
68470
99
99
1


(0.06% EtOH)







DC-TIV-1.0, 0.004%
67092
67275
97
97
3


(0.3% EtOH)







DC-TIV-1.0, 0.02%
68611
67415
99
97
2


(1.5% EtOH)







DC-TIV-1.0, 0.1%
65686
62732
95
91
7


(7% EtOH)







0.06% EtOH control
67102
65413
97
94
4


0.3% EtOH control
67558
66286
98
96
3


1.5% EtOH control
68907
68688
99
99
1


7% EtOH control
68106
69743
98
101
0


Anti-ACE2, 0.27 μM
39545
38080
57
55
44


Spike-Fc, 0.01 μM
63863
63541
92
92
8


Spike-Fc, 0.1 μM
38990
44396
56
64
40


Spike-Fc, 1 μM
9850
10519
14
15
85


Blank
78
47
0
0
100



















TABLE 26








Luminescence
Activity (%)
Inh.












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
78752
77962
101
99



(EtOH, 0%)







DC-5, 0.0008%
88634
87345
113
111
0


DC-5, 0.004%
88490
87713
113
112
0


DC-5, 0.02%
86311
82378
110
105
0


DC-5, 0.1%
46242
32236
59
41
50


DC-9, 0.0008%
88766
87246
113
111
0


DC-9, 0.004%
82412
80733
105
103
0


DC-9, 0.02%
65595
69238
84
88
14


DC-9, 0.1%
3681
5643
5
7
94


DC-13, 0.0008%
83749
83790
107
107
0


DC-13, 0.004%
78717
76657
100
98
1


DC-13, 0.02%
47967
53241
61
68
35


DC-13, 0.1%
608
211
1
0
100


DC-21, 0.0008%
84059
81164
107
104
0


DC-21, 0.004%
83790
81432
107
104
0


DC-21, 0.02%
78473
78360
100
100
0


DC-21, 0.1%
66249
64005
85
82
17


EtOH, 0.06%
78473
82268
100
105
0


EtOH, 0.3%
80826
81863
103
104
0


EtOH, 1.5%
78508
78870
100
101
0


EtOH, 7%
71844
68213
92
87
11


Anti-ACE2, 0.27 μM
34327
36753
44
47
55


Spike-Fc, 0.01 μM
72198
74621
92
95
6


Spike-Fc, 0.1 μM
49403
50633
63
65
36


Spike-Fc, 1 μM
13755
11790
17
15
84


Blank
63
53










BACE1:


In a further set of experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions and fractions thereof as well as a multivitamin mix had an effect on the activity of recombinant human BACE1 using an in vitro fluorescence assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 26-28 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (*Verubecestat was used as reference compound). Table 26 shows the representative composition, while Table 27 shows the colored fractions and multivitamin mix. Here, DC-5=Yellow Blend, DC-9=Purple Blend, DC-21-Green Blend, DC-13=Red Blend DCH-TIV 1.0 (Adult Centrum Multivitamins). The red blend included Apple Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Tomato Powder, Beet; the green blend included Olive Extract, Rosemary Extract, Green Coffee Bean Extract, Kale; the orange/yellow blend included Onion Extract, Ginger Extract, Grapefruit Extract, Carrot; and the purple/blue blend included Grape, Blueberry Extract, Currant, and Elderberry as listed above.













TABLE 27






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002


lot#33890000X11020



and 0.01%


Verubecestat*
Powder
10 mM
DMSO
0.01, 0.1






and 1 μM




















TABLE 28






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DC-5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002






and 0.01%


DC-9
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002






and 0.01%


DC-13
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002






and 0.01%


DC-21
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002






and 0.01%


DCH-TIV 1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002






and 0.01%


Verubecestat*
Powder
10 mM
100% DMSO
0.01, 0.1 and 1 μM




















TABLE 29





Assay
Catalog #
Protein lot #
[E] (ng/well)
Substrate







BACE1
71657
170307
500
7.5 μM BACE1






FRET peptide






substrate









Assay Conditions: 80 μl of BACE1 was incubated with 10 μl of samples and reference compound for 10 minutes. Then, reaction was started by the addition of 10 μl of BACE1 FRET peptide substrate and product kinetics were measured for 1 hour in an Infinite M1000 microplate reader (Tecan). In Blank control wells, 80 μl of assay buffer was added instead of enzyme, all wells contained 0.7% (v/v) EtOH final assay concentration.


Data Analysis: All conditions were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The fluorescent intensity data was analyzed using Prism (GraphPad). In the absence of the compound (No compound control), the fluorescent intensity (Ft) in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of the enzyme (Blank control), the fluorescent intensity (Fb) in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % Activity=(F−Fb)/(Ft−Fb), where F=the fluorescent intensity in the presence of the compound. Fluorescence at initial time was subtracted to obtain net signal, measured in relative fluorescence units (RLU).


As can be seen form the data in Table 29 and FIG. 8, the representative composition had substantial inhibitory activity against BACE1 as tested. Remarkably, as can be seen from the data in Table 30 and FIG. 9, the colored fractions also provided significant inhibition of BACE1. Moreover, it is also evident from these data that the BACE1 inhibition is synergistic, while the tested multivitamin had substantially no inhibitory effect.













TABLE 30








Fluorescence














(net RFU)
Activity (%)
Inh.












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
419
403
102
98
0


#33890000X11020, 0.0004%
166
143
39
34
63


#33890000X11020, 0.002%
69
66
15
15
85


#33890000X11020, 0.01%
47
61
10
13
88


Verubecestat, 0.01 μM
381
386
93
94
7


Verubecestat, 0.1 μM
168
158
40
37
61


Verubecestat, 1 μM
16
20
2
3
97


Blank
8
6




















TABLE 31








Fluorescence














(net RFU)
Activity (%)
Inh.












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
779
795
99
101



DC-5, 0.0004%
651
620
83
79
19


DC-5, 0.002%
671
636
85
81
17


DC-5, 0.01%
670
622
85
79
18


DC-9, 0.0004%
332
286
42
36
61


DC-9, 0.002%
138
142
17
18
83


DC-9, 0.01%
231
146
29
18
76


DC-13, 0.0004%
241
274
30
34
68


DC-13, 0.002%
184
176
23
22
78


DC-13, 0.01%
158
198
20
25
78


DC-21, 0.0004%
739
763
94
97
5


DC-21, 0.002%
592
613
75
78
24


DC-21, 0.01%
436
375
55
47
49


DCH-TIV 1.0, 0.0004%
797
784
101
100
0


DCH-TIV 1.0, 0.002%
767
774
97
98
2


DCH-TIV 1.0, 0.01%
765
721
97
92
6


Verubecestat, 0.01 μM
821
793
104
101
0


Verubecestat, 0.1 μM
684
676
87
86
14


Verubecestat, 1 μM
27
31
3
3
97


Blank
8
1










Cathepsin S:


In yet another set of experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions and fractions thereof as well as a multivitamin mix had an effect on the activity of recombinant human Cathepsin S using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 31-33 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (*E-64 was used as reference compound). Here, the designations and ingredients of D5, D9, D13, and D21 are as noted above.













TABLE 32






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02


lot#33890000X11020



and 0.1%


E-64
Solution
1 mM
DMSO
1, 10 and 100 nM




















TABLE 33






Form





Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Dissolving Solvent
Test Range







D5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D9
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D13
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D21
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


E-64
Solution
1 mM
DMSO
1, 10 and 100 nM




















TABLE 34






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DCH-TIV-0.5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02 and 0.1%


DCH-TIV-1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02 and 0.1%


(Adult Centrum






Multivitamin)






E-64*
Solution
1 mM
DMSO
0.001, 0.01 and 0.1 μM









Assay Conditions: Cathepsin S was activated by diluting the concentrated storage stock into the acidic assay buffer for 30 minutes at room temperature. Then, 5 μl of the sample or reference inhibitor was added to 20 μl of enzyme solution and pre-incubated for 30 minutes. The enzymatic reactions were started by the addition of 25 μl of the fluorogenic substrate, for a total reaction volume of 50 μl. Reaction time was 60 minutes, and then fluorescence intensity at an excitation of 360 nm and an emission of 460 nm was read using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: Enzyme activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The fluorescence intensity data were analyzed and compared. In the absence of the compound, the intensity in each data set was defined as 100% (Ce) activity. In the absence of enzyme, the intensity in each data set was defined as 0% (C0) activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(C−C0)/(Ce−C0), where C=the intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table). Compound fluorescence was removed by subtracting fluorescence at reaction time=0.


The results for the above tests are shown in Tables 34-36, with Table 34 and FIG. 10 showing results for the representative composition, Table 35 and FIG. 11 showing results for the various colored fractions, and Table 36 and FIG. 12 showing results for the multivitamin mixture (DCH-TIC-0.5 is representative composition; DCH-TIC-1.0 is Centrum multivitamin mix). As can be readily seen form the results, the representative composition as well as colored blends D9 and D13 had significant inhibition of Cathepsin S, whereas the multivitamin mix had comparably no substantial effect.












TABLE 35








Net Signal





(Fluorescence counts)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
10117
10153
100
100



#33890000X11020, 0.0004%
2866
2790
28
27
72


#33890000X11020, 0.002%
543
520
5
5
95


#33890000X11020, 0.01%
202
218
2
2
98


E-64. 1 nM
9894
9604
98
95
4


E-64, 10 nM
5170
5444
51
54
48


E-64, 100 nM
958
960
9
9
91


Blank
10
7






















TABLE 36








Net Signal





(Fluorescence counts)
Activity (%)













Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Inhibition (%)















No compound
9022
8921
101
99



D5, 0.0004%
7844
8711
87
97
8


D5, 0.002%
7888
7297
88
81
15


D5, 0.01%
7040
7451
78
83
19


D9, 0.0004%
1377
1759
15
20
83


D9, 0.002%
447
446
5
5
95


D9, 0.01%
222
238
2
3
97


D13, 0.0004%
883
914
10
10
90


D13, 0.002%
271
314
3
3
97


D13, 0.01%
128
131
1
1
99


D21, 0.0004%
8732
8446
97
94
4


D21, 0.002%
7211
6789
80
76
22


D21, 0.01%
956
736
11
8
91


E-64, 1 nM
8864
8931
99
100
1


E-64, 10 nM
5727
5326
64
59
38


E-64, 100 nM
1009
1033
11
12
89


Blank
0
0






















TABLE 37








Net Signal





(Fluorescence counts)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
60213
59191
101
99
0


DCH-TIC-0.5, 0.0004%
37364
38895
63
65
36


DCH-TIC-0.5, 0.002%
13816
12919
23
22
78


DCH-TIC-0.5, 0.01%
1258
1445
2
2
98


DCH-TIC-1.0, 0.0004%
61364
58864
103
99
0


DCH-TIC-1.0, 0.002%
61972
62138
104
104
0


DCH-TIC-1.0, 0.1%
41515
43925
69
74
28


E-64, 0.001 μM
52418
49644
88
83
15


E-64, 0.01 μM
21262
19656
36
33
66


E-64, 0.1 μM
3091
3478
5
6
95


Blank
37
114













CDK5:


In a further set of experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions and fractions thereof as well as a multivitamin mix had an effect on the enzymatic activities of recombinant human CDK5/p25 using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 37-39 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (Dinaciclib was used as reference compound). Here, the designations and ingredients of D5, D9, D13, and D21 are as noted above.














TABLE 38






Compound
Stock
Dissolving

Intermediate


Compound I.D.
Supplied
Concentration
Solvent
Test Range
Dilution







HP Colors
Solution
1%
70% Ethanol
0.01%, 0.002%,
Water


X11020



0.0004%



Dinaciclib
Solution
10 mM
DMSO
0.002 μM, 0.02 μM,
10% DMSO






0.2 μM
(aq)





















TABLE 39






Compound
Stock
Dissolving

Intermediate


Compound I.D.
Supplied
Concentration
Solvent
Test Range
Dilution







DC-5
Solution
1%
70% Ethanol
0.01%, 0.002%, 0.0004%
Water


DC-9
Solution
1%
70% Ethanol
0.01%, 0.002%, 0.0004%
Water


DC-13
Solution
1%
70% Ethanol
0.01%, 0.002%, 0.0004%
Water


DC-21
Solution
1%
70% Ethanol
0.01%, 0.002%, 0.0004%
Water


DCH-TIV 1.0
Solution
1%
70% Ethanol
0.01%, 0.002%, 0.0004%
Water


(Adult Centrum







Multivitamin)







Dinaciclib
Solution
10 mM
DMSO
0.002 μM, 0.02 μM, 0.2 μM
10% DMSO (aq)



















TABLE 40






Catalog #
Enzyme Used/



Assay
(Lot #)
Reaction (ng)
Substrate


















CDK5/p25
40105
10
0.1 mg/ml CDK



(130618-2)

Substrate Peptide 1





10 μM ATP









Assay Conditions: The assay was performed using Kinase-Glo Plus luminescence kinase assay kit (Promega). It measures kinase activity by quantitating the amount of ATP remaining in solution following a kinase reaction. The luminescent signal from the assay is correlated with the amount of ATP present and is inversely correlated with the amount of kinase activity. The reference compound was diluted to 10% DMSO and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction so that the final concentration of DMSO is 1% in all of reactions. The test compound was diluted in water and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction. All of the enzymatic reactions were conducted at 30° C. for 45 minutes. The 50 μl reaction mixture contains 40 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM DTT, 10 μM ATP, Kinase substrate and the enzyme. After the enzymatic reaction, 50 μl of Kinase-Glo Plus Luminescence kinase assay solution (Promega) was added to each reaction and incubated for 15 minutes, on the plate, at room temperature. Luminescence signal was measured using a BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: Kinase activity assays were performed in duplicate at each concentration. The luminescence data were analyzed using the computer software, Graphpad Prism. The difference between luminescence intensities in the absence of Kinase (Lut) and in the presence of Kinase (Luc) was defined as 100% activity (Lut−Luc). Using luminescence signal (Lu) in the presence of the compound, % activity was calculated as: % activity={(Lut−Lu)/(Lut−Luc)}×100%, where Lu=the luminescence intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table).


The results for the above tests are shown in Tables 40-42, with Table 40 and FIG. 13 showing results for the representative composition, Table 41 and FIG. 14 showing results for the various colored fractions and the multivitamin mixture (here denoted as DCH-TIV 1.0). As can be readily taken from the data presented, the representative composition and the fractions thereof had significant inhibitory effect on CDK5, whereas the multivitamin mix had substantially no appreciable inhibitory effect as compared to the representative composition. Moreover, and at least at medium and low concentrations, the CDK5 inhibition had an at least moderate synergistic effect in the representative composition.












TABLE 41








Kinase Activity





Luminescence
% Activity













Compounds
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
% Inhibition















No Compound
21499
21364
100
100



HP Colors X11020, 0.0004%
26178
26281
73
73
27


HP Colors X11020, 0.002%
33942
33967
29
29
71


HP Colors X11020, 0.01%
38055
38177
6
5
94


Dinaciclib, 0.002 μM
28384
28205
61
62
39


Dinaciclib, 0.02 μM
36896
36850
12
13
87


Dinaciclib, 0.2 μM
37268
37490
10
9
90


Background
38991
39210






















TABLE 42








Kinase Activity





Luminescence
% Activity













Compounds
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
% Inhibition















No Compound
20187
20295
100
100



0.0004% DC-5
23997
23914
81
82
19


0.002% DC-5
35968
35411
22
24
77


0.01% DC-5
40138
40324
1
0
100


0.0004% DC-9
22139
22596
91
88
11


0.002% DC-9
27328
27981
65
61
37


0.01% DC-9
36274
36077
20
21
79


0.0004% DC-13
25412
25396
74
74
26


0.002% DC-13
28786
28580
57
58
42


0.01% DC-13
33831
33995
32
31
68


0.0004% DC-21
20168
20357
100
99
0


0.002% DC-21
22651
22070
88
91
11


0.01% DC-21
30462
30543
49
49
51


0.0004% DCH-TIV 1.0
20553
20979
98
96
3


0.002% DCH-TIV 1.0
20929
21076
97
96
4


0.01% DCH-TIV 1.0
21472
21736
94
93
7


Dinaciclib, 0.002 μM
29310
29124
55
56
45


Dinaciclib, 0.02 μM
38603
39041
8
6
93


Dinaciclib, 0.2 μM
40248
39973
0
2
99


Background
40474
40099













IDO1/IDO2:


In a further set of experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on the enzymatic activities of recombinant human IDO1 and/or IDO2 using an UV absorbance assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 42-43 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise.














TABLE 43







Stock






Compound
Concentration

Test
Intermediate


Compound I.D.
Supplied
(mM)
Solvent
concentration
Dilution




















DailyColors Blend
Liquid
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.01%, 0.002%,
20% DMSO


Lot # 33890000X11020



0.0004%



INCB024360*
Liquid
0.05
DMSO
0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 μM
20% DMSO




















TABLE 44








Enzyme






concentration



Assay
Catalog#
Lot#
(nM)
Substrate



















IDO1
71182
180305-B
40
L-Tryptophan






(4 mM)


IDO2
71194
160519-C
400
L-Tryptophan






(4 mM)









Assay Conditions: The assay was performed measuring UV absorbance using recombinant IDO and L-Tryptophan as substrate. The UV absorbance at 321 nm is correlated with the amount of N-formylkynurenine, reaction product of IDO. The compounds (see 2.2) were diluted in 20% DMSO and 10 μl of the dilution was added to a 200 μl reaction so that the final concentration of DMSO was 1% in all reactions. All of the reactions were conducted at room temperature. The 200 μl reaction mixture in IDO Assay Buffer contained 400 nM IDO1 or IDO2, the indicated amount of the inhibitor, tryptophan, and the coupled reaction components. The reaction mixture incubated was for 180 min prior to reading the UV absorbance. For the negative control (blank), 10 μl of the assay buffer was added instead of the IDO enzyme. Absorbance was measured using a Tecan Infinite M1000 plate reader.


Data Analysis: The experiments were performed in duplicate at each concentration. The data were analyzed using the computer software GraphPad Prism. In the absence of the compound, the absorbance signal (At) in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of the IDO, the absorbance signal (Ab) in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=[(A−Ab)/(At−Ab)]×100, where A=the absorbance signal in the presence of the compound. The percent inhibition was calculated according to the following equation: % inhibition=100−% activity.


The results for the above tests are shown in Tables 44-45, with Table 44 and FIG. 15 showing results for the representative composition on inhibition of IDO1, and Table 45 and FIG. 16 showing results for the representative composition on inhibition of IDO2. As can be readily taken from the data presented, the representative composition had inhibitory effect on IDO1 at higher concentrations and significant inhibitory effect on IDO2 at higher and moderate concentrations.












TABLE 45








Absorbance (net)
Activity (%)













Compound I.D.
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
% Inhibition















No Compound
0.82
0.76
104
96
0


DailyColors Blend, 0.0004%
1.13
1.15
145
147
0


DailyColors Blend, 0.002%
0.87
0.89
111
113
0


DailyColors Blend, 0.01%
0.57
0.56
71
70
30


INCB024360, 0.1 μM
0.73
0.74
92
93
7


INCB024360, 1 μM
0.29
0.30
34
36
65


INCB024360, 10 μM
0.07
0.09
5
8
93


Blank
0.03
0.03






















TABLE 46








Absorbance (net)
Activity (%)













Compound I.D.
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
% Inhibition















No Compound
0.17
0.16
105
95
0


DailyColors Blend, 0.0004%
0.46
0.45
395
385
0


DailyColors Blend, 0.002%
0.15
0.16
85
95
10


DailyColors Blend, 0.01%
0.07
0.07
5
5
95


INCB024360, 0.01 μM
0.17
0.17
105
105
0


INCB024360, 0.1 μM
0.14
0.15
75
85
20


INCB024360, 1 μM
0.10
0.11
35
45
60


Blank
0.06
0.07













NAMPT:


In still another set of experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on the enzymatic activities of recombinant human NAMPT using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 46-47 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise.













TABLE 47






Compound
Stock
Dissolving



Compound I.D.
Supplied
Concentration
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend lot#
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004%, 0.002%, and


33890000X11020



0.01%


FK-866*
Powder
10 mM
DMSO
0.001 μM, 0.01 μM, and






0.1 μM




















TABLE 48








Enzyme Used



Assay
Catalog #
Enzyme Lot #
(ng)/Reaction
Substrate



















NAMPT
91004
171009-2
100
Nicotinamide 20 μM/






Phosphoribosyl






pyrophosphate 40 μM









Assay Conditions: The control compound is dissolved in DMSO. The dilution of the compounds was first performed in 100% DMSO with the highest concentration at 0.01 mM. Each intermediate compound dilution (in 100% DMSO) will then get directly diluted 10× fold into assay buffer for an intermediate dilution of 10% DMSO in assay buffer and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction so that the final concentration of DMSO is 1% in the reactions of the control compound and NAMPT only. For NAMPT, the compounds (see 2.2) were preincubated with NAMPT enzyme (see 2.3.1) in for 30 minutes. All of the enzymatic reactions were conducted in duplicate at 30° C. for 120 minutes by adding the substrate mixture containing in a 50 μl mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HC1, pH 8.0, 12.5 mM MgC12, 20 μM nicotinamide, 40 μM PRPP, 20 μM ATP, 30 μg/mL of alcohol dehydrogenase, 10 μg/mL of NMNAT, 1.5% alcohol, 1 mM DTT, 0.02% BSA, 0.01% Tween 20. The final concentration of DMSO in all reactions was 1%. Fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation of 340 nm and an emission of 460 nm using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: NAMPT activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The fluorescent intensity data were analyzed using the computer software, GraphPad Prism. In the absence of the compound, the fluorescent intensity (Ft) in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of NAMPT, the fluorescent intensity (Fb) in each data set was defined as 0% activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(F−Fb)/(Ft−Fb), where F=the fluorescent intensity in the presence of the compound. The values of percentage activity were plotted on a bar graph.


Results for the above experiments are shown in Table 48 and FIG. 17. As will be readily appreciated, the representative composition had an inhibitory effect on NAMPT.













TABLE 49








NAMPT Activity






(Fluorescence
Background





Intensity)
(Fluorescence count)
% Activity















Compound
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
% Inhibition

















No Compound
3507
3493
476
474
100
100
0


33890000X11020, 0.0004%
3512
3494
508
516
99
99
1


33890000X11020, 0.002%
3493
3515
737
715
91
92
8


33890000X11020, 0.01%
3625
3633
1657
1646
65
65
35


FK-866, 0.001 μM
3328
3345
450
442
95
96
4


FK-866, 0.01 μM
1750
1766
454
461
42
43
57


FK-866, 0.1 μM
463
468
440
442
0
0
100


Background
452
460
438
442










PCSK9:


In further experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on binding of recombinant human PCSK9 and LDLR using an in vitro ELISA.


The reagents used are shown in Tables 49-50 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (Anti-PCSK9 was used as a reference compound).













TABLE 50






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range



















HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02


lot#33890000X11020



and 0.1%


Anti-PCSK9*
Solution
15 μM
DMSO
0.1, 1 and 10 nM





















TABLE 51







Assay
Catalog #
Lot #
Protein (ng/well)





















PCSK9-Biotin
71304
191212-1
100



LDLR
71205
190927-G
50










Assay Conditions: 5 μl of sample or reference inhibitor was pre-incubated with 25 μl of 1× PCSK9 Assay Buffer in assay wells before starting the reaction by the addition of 20 μl of 2.5 ng/μl PCSK9-Biotin. Reaction was progressed for 2 hours at room temperature. Then, wells were washed three times with 1× PCSK9Assay Buffer and blocked with Blocking Buffer for 10 minutes. 100 μl of Streptavidin-HRP was added to all wells and incubated for 1 hour. Lastly, plate was emptied, washed three times and blocked before the addition of 100 μl of freshly prepared HRP chemiluminescent substrates to every well. Immediately, the luminescence of the samples was measured in a BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: Binding activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The luminescence signal was analyzed and compared. In the absence of the compound, the signal in each data set was defined as 100% (Ce) activity. In the absence of ligand (no LDLR), the signal in each data set was defined as 0% (C0) activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(C−C0)/(Ce−C0), where C=the intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table). Compound fluorescence was removed by subtracting fluorescence at reaction time=0.


Results for the PCSK9 binding inhibition assay are shown in Table 51 and FIG. 18. As can be clearly seen form the data, the representative composition had significant inhibitory activity on binding of recombinant human PCSK9 and LDLR.













TABLE 52








Signal














(Luminescence





counts)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
78139
77171
101
99



#33890000X11020,
66611
67834
86
87
13


0.0004%







#33890000X11020,
63124
64635
81
83
18


0.002%







#33890000X11020,
51675
53641
66
69
32


0.01%







Anti-PCSK9, 0.1 nM
73367
73719
94
95
5


Anti-PCSK9, 1 nM
50528
52995
65
68
33


Anti-PCSK9, 10 nM
2614
2593
3
3
97


Blank
304
321










CD47:


In additional experiments, the inventor further sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on the binding activity of recombinant human CD47 (hCD47) with human SIRP-α (hSIRP-α) using an in vitro binding assay.


The reagents used are shown in Tables 52-53 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (Anti-PCSK9 was used as a reference compound).












TABLE 53






Compound
Stock



Compound I.D.
Supplied
Concentration
Test Range


















DailyColors blend
Solution
1% in 70%
0.01, 0.002, 00004%




ethanol



SIRP-α
Solution
2.15 mg/ml
0.05, 0.5, 5 μM




















TABLE 54








Catalog #
Protein



Proteins
(lot#)
Reaction









hCD47, Fc fusion
71177
100 ng




(140429)




hSIRP-α, Biotin-labeled
71138
600 ng




(150604)










Assay Conditions: CD47 was coated using 50 μL at 2 ng/μL at 4° C. overnight. After wash and block steps the test compounds were added to CD47-coated plate followed by addition of SIRP-α-biotin. Reaction was incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Binding was detected using HRP-conjugated Streptavidin.


Data Analysis: Binding assays were performed in duplicate at each concentration. The luminescence data were analyzed using the computer software, GraphPad Prism. Percent inhibition was determined by normalizing the data to signal from negative control wells (uncoated wells treated with the biotinylated ligand, set as 100% inhibition) and positive control wells (coated wells treated with the biotinylated ligand in the absence of any inhibitor, set as 0% inhibition).


Results for the above experiment are listed in Table 54 and FIG. 19. Once more, it can be seen that the representative composition had significant inhibitory effect on the binding activity of recombinant human CD47 (hCD47) with human SIRP-α.












TABLE 55








Luminescence
Activity %













Compound
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Inhibition %















Negative Control
92
94





Positive Control
36937
38732
98
102
0


0.0004%
36685
38062
97
101
1


DailyColors blend







0.002%
33162
33355
88
88
12


DailyColors blend







0.01% DailyColors
25830
26539
68
70
31


blend







0.05 μM SIRP-α
35347
36581
93
97
5


0.5 μM SIRP-α
19746
19259
52
51
49


5 μM SIRP-α
5310
6891
14
18
84










CD38:


In another set of experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions and fractions thereof as well as a multivitamin mix and other compounds known to affect NAD+ levels had an effect on the hydrolase enzymatic activity of recombinant human CD38 using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 55-59 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (*Apigenin was used as reference compound). Table 55 shows the representative composition, while Table 56 shows the colored fractions and multivitamin mix. Here, DC-5=Yellow Blend, DC-9=Purple Blend, DC-21-Green Blend, DC-13=Red Blend DCH-TIV 1.0 (Adult Centrum Multivitamins). The red blend included Apple Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Tomato Powder, Beet; the green blend included Olive Extract, Rosemary Extract, Green Coffee Bean Extract, Kale; the orange/yellow blend included Onion Extract, Ginger Extract, Grapefruit Extract, Carrot; and the purple/blue blend included Grape, Blueberry Extract, Currant, and Elderberry as listed above. Table 57 shows two compounds known to influence NAD+ levels: Commercially available “Elysium Health NAD” and “TrueNiagen”, both containing nicotinamide riboside, while Table 58 shows the representative composition (DCH-TIV-0.5) and a multivitamin composition (DCH-TIV-1.0 (Adult Centrum Multivitamin)). Table 59 shows the enzyme and substrate used in this set of experiments.













TABLE 56






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02


lot#33890000X11020



and 0.1%


Apigenin
Solution
50 mM
DMSO
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 57






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







D5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D9
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D13
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D21
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


Apigenin
Solution
50 mM
DMSO
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 58






Form
Stock
Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DCH-ELY-1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002


(Elysium Health



and 0.01%


NAD)






DCH-TN-1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002


(TruNiagen;



and 0.01%


nicotinamide riboside)






Apigenin
Solution
50 mM
DMSO
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 59






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DCH-TIV-0.5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02 and 0.1%


DCH-TIV-1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02 and 0.1%


(Adult Centrum






Multivitamin)






Apigenin
Solution
50 mM
DMSO
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 60








Enzyme Used



Assay
Catalog #
Enzyme Lot #
(ng)/Reaction
Substrate







CD38
71277
170801-1
20
10 μM ε-NAD









Assay Conditions: 10 μl of the sample or reference inhibitor was added to 20 μl of enzyme solution and pre-incubated for 30 minutes. The enzymatic reactions were started by the addition of 20 μl of the substrate ε-NAD+, for a total reaction volume of 50 μl. Reaction time was 10 minutes, and then fluorescence intensity at an excitation of 300 nm and an emission of 410 nm was read using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: Enzyme activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The fluorescence intensity data were analyzed and compared. In the absence of the compound, the intensity in each data set was defined as 100% (Ce) activity. In the absence of enzyme, the intensity in each data set was defined as 0% (C0) activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(C−C0)/(Ce−C0), where C=the intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table). Compound fluorescence was removed by subtracting fluorescence at reaction time=0.


The results for the above substrates are shown in Tables 60-63 and FIGS. 20-23. More specifically, Table 60 and FIG. 20 show the results where the representative composition was used for inhibition of CD38. As can be readily seen from the data, the representative composition exhibited remarkably strong inhibition. Table 61 and FIG. 21 show the results where the colored fractions of the representative composition was used for inhibition of CD38. Notably, here as well a strong inhibition was observed. Moreover, it should be noted that the colored fractions in the representative composition provided a strong synergistic effect with respect to CD38 inhibition.


Table 62 and FIG. 22 show the results for corresponding experiments where the where the “Elysium Health NAD” and “TrueNiagen” (both containing nicotinamide riboside) were used for inhibition of CD38. Here, both formulations showed inhibition of CD38, however, not to the same extent as for the representative composition. In contrast, Table 63 and FIG. 23 show the results for corresponding experiments where a multivitamin composition was used to inhibit CD38. Here, a direct comparison is shown between the representative composition (DCH-TIV-0.5) and the multivitamin composition (DCH-TIV-1.0 in Table 63, DCH-TIG-1.0 in FIG. 23).













TABLE 61








Net Signal














(Fluorescence counts)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
4393
4027
104
96



#33890000X11020,
603
694
14
16
85


0.0004%







#33890000X11020,
411
516
10
12
89


0.002%







#33890000X11020,
346
311
8
7
92


0.01%







Apigenin, 1 μM
3461
3761
82
89
14


Apigenin, 10 μM
647
618
15
14
85


Apigenin, 100 μM
185
135
4
3
96


Blank
3
19
0
0




















TABLE 62








Net Signal














(Fluorescence counts)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
9204
9171
100
100



D5, 0.0004%
8528
8830
93
96
6


D5, 0.002%
6850
6811
74
74
26


D5, 0.01%
4253
4353
46
47
53


D9, 0.0004%
8679
9582
94
104
1


D9, 0.002%
8327
8618
91
94
8


D9, 0.01%
7801
7614
85
83
16


D13, 0.0004%
4811
5203
52
57
46


D13, 0.002%
5168
5154
56
56
44


D13, 0.01%
3876
3771
42
41
59


D21, 0.0004%
8340
9222
91
100
4


D21, 0.002%
8122
8226
88
90
11


D21, 0.01%
5853
5812
64
63
37


Apigenin, 1 μM
8650
8614
94
94
6


Apigenin, 10 μM
4670
5416
51
59
45


Apigenin, 100 μM
1979
2165
21
23
78


Blank
29
25




















TABLE 63








Net Signal














(Fluorescence counts)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
13504
13458
100
100
0


DCH-ELY-1,0,
1736
1733
13
13
87


0.01%







DCH-ELY-1.0,
4571
4564
34
34
66


0.002%







DCH-ELY-1.0,
8806
8767
65
65
35


0.0004%







DCH-TN-1.0,
1742
1722
13
13
87


0.01%







DCH-TN-1.0,
3776
3716
28
27
72


0.002%







DCH-TN-1.0,
7650
7587
57
56
44


0.0004%







Apigenin, 1 μM
11531
11647
86
86
14


Apigenin, 10 μM
7118
7228
53
54
47


Apigenin, 100 μM
5012
5473
37
40
61


Blank
30
29



















TABLE 64








Net Signal





(Fluorescence
Activity
Inhibi-



counts)
(%)
tion












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
4383
4355
100
100
0


DCH-TIV-0.5, 0.0004%
838
810
18
18
82


DCH-TIV-0.5, 0.002%
653
541
14
12
87


DCH-TIV-0.5, 0.01%
240
296
5
6
95


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.0004%
4371
4320
100
99
1


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.002%
4168
4209
95
96
4


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.01%
3812
3744
87
86
14


Apigenin, 1 μM
4138
3883
95
89
8


Apigenin, 10 μM
3091
3057
70
70
30


Apigenin, 100 μM
632
728
14
16
85


Blank
52
23










JAK1/JAK2/JAK3:


In further experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions and fractions thereof had an effect on the enzymatic activities of the recombinant human kinases JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3 using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 64-66 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (*Apigenin was used as reference compound). Table 64 shows the representative composition, while Table 65 shows the colored fractions. Here, DC-5=Yellow Blend, DC-9=Purple Blend, DC-21-Green Blend, DC-13=Red Blend. The red blend included Apple Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Tomato Powder, Beet; the green blend included Olive Extract, Rosemary Extract, Green Coffee Bean Extract, Kale; the orange/yellow blend included Onion Extract, Ginger Extract, Grapefruit Extract, Carrot; and the purple/blue blend included Grape, Blueberry Extract, Currant, and Elderberry as listed above. Staurosporine was used as a reference compound. Table 66 lists the enzymes and substrates used in the assays.














TABLE 65






Com-
Stock
Dis-

Inter-


Compound
pound
Concen-
solving
Test
mediate


I.D.
Supplied
tration
Solvent
Range
Dilution







DailyColors
solution
1% (w/v)
70%
0.01%,
Water


Blend Lot #


EtOH
0.002%,



33890000X11020



0.0004%



Staurosporine
solution
1 mM
DMSO
0.001 μM,
10%






0.01 μM,
DMSO (aq)






0.1 μM





















TABLE 66





Com-

Stock





pound
Compound
Concen-
Dissolving
Test
Intermediate


I.D.
Supplied
tration
Solvent
Range
Dilution







DC-5
solution
1% (w/v)
70%
0.01%,
Water





EtOH
0.002%,







0.0004%



DC-9
solution
1% (w/v)
70%
0.01%,
Water





EtOH
0.002%,







0.0004%



DC-13
solution
1% (w/v)
70%
0.01%,
Water





EtOH
0.002%,







0.0004%



DC-21
solution
1% (w/v)
70%
0.01%,
Water





EtOH
0.002%,







0.0004%



Stauro-
solution
1 mM
DMSO
30 nM-3 μM
10% DMSO


sporine




(aq)



















TABLE 67






Catalog #
Enzyme Used (ng)/



Assay
(Lot #)
Reaction
Substrate







Jak 1
40449
100 
0.1 mg/ml, IRS 1-tide/



(190919-3)

10 μM ATP


Jak 2
40450
50
0.2 mg/ml Poly (Glu, Tyr)/



(190603-G)

10 μM ATP


Jak 3
40452
10
0.2 mg/ml Poly (Glu, Tyr)/



(150921-B2)

10 μM ATP









Assay Conditions: The assay was performed using Kinase-Glo Plus luminescence kinase assay kit (Promega). It measures kinase activity by quantitating the amount of ATP remaining in solution following a kinase reaction. The luminescent signal from the assay is correlated with the amount of ATP present and is inversely correlated with the amount of kinase activity. The reference compound was diluted as noted. The compound was diluted in water and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a 50 μl reaction. All of the enzymatic reactions were conducted at 30° C. for 45 minutes. The 50 μl reaction mixture contains 40 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM DTT, 10 μM ATP, Kinase substrate and the respective enzyme. After the enzymatic reaction, 50 μl of Kinase-Glo Plus Luminescence kinase assay solution (Promega) was added to each reaction and incubate the plate for 15 minutes at room temperature. Luminescence signal was measured using a BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader.


Data Analysis: Kinase activity assays were performed in duplicate at each concentration. The luminescence data were analyzed using the computer software, GraphPad Prism. The difference between luminescence intensities in the absence of Kinase (Lut) and in the presence of Kinase (Luc) was defined as 100% activity (Lut−Luc). Using luminescence signal (Lu) in the presence of the compound, % activity was calculated as: % activity={(Lut−Lu)/(Lut−Luc)}×100%, where Lu=the luminescence intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table).


The results for inhibition using the representative composition are shown in Tables 67-69 and FIGS. 24-26. Table 67 and FIG. 24 show results for JAK1 inhibition using the representative composition. Table 68 and FIG. 25 show results for JAK2 inhibition using the representative composition. Table 69 and FIG. 26 show results for JAK3 inhibition using the representative composition. As can be readily taken from these results, the inhibition of all three tested JAK kinases was significant and substantial, matching or exceeding the inhibition provided by the reference compound.












TABLE 68








Kinase Activity

%



Luminescence
% Activity
Inhibi-












Compounds
Repeat1
Repeat2
Repeat1
Repeat2
tion















No Compound
24012
26135
107
93



0.0004% DailyColors
25706
26483
96
91
6


Blend







0.002% DailyColors
37313
38359
23
16
81


Blend







0.01% DailyColors
42256
42457
0
0
100


Blend







0.001 μM Staurosporine
25176
27054
99
87
7


0.01 μM Staurosporine
37642
35358
21
35
72


0.1 μM Staurosporine
40161
40781
5
1
97


Background
40868
40953



















TABLE 69








Kinase Activity

%



Luminescence
% Activity
Inhibi-












Compounds
Repeat1
Repeat2
Repeat1
Repeat2
tion















No Compound
20027
20151
100
100



0.0004% DailyColors
35932
34651
21
27
76


Blend







0.002% DailyColors
36319
36342
19
19
81


Blend







0.01% DailyColors
41665
40587
0
0
100


Blend







0.001 μM Staurosporine
19100
20922
105
96
0


0.01 μM Staurosporine
36988
36554
16
18
83


0.1 μM Staurosporine
42700
40639
0
0
100


Background
40021
40218



















TABLE 70








Kinase Activity

%



Luminescence
% Activity
Inhibi-












Compounds
Repeat1
Repeat2
Repeat1
Repeat2
tion















No Compound
18990
20947
100
95



0.0004% DailyColors
35140
35074
20
21
79


Blend







0.002% DailyColors
36502
37407
13
8
89


Blend







0.01% DailyColors
39437
41388
0
0
100


Blend







0.001 μM Staurosporine
23814
23348
80
82
19


0.01 μM Staurosporine
32137
32417
36
35
65


0.1 μM Staurosporine
39970
40121
0
0
100


Background
38815
39237









Tables 70-72 and FIGS. 27-29 show corresponding results for the colored fractions. Here, Table 70 shows results for JAK1 inhibition using colored fractions of the representative composition. Table 71 shows results for JAK2 inhibition using colored fractions of the representative composition, and Table 72 shows results for JAK3 inhibition using colored fractions of the representative composition. Table 73 is a summary table of the results in Tables 70-72. Notably, a synergistic effect on inhibition against all three JAK kinases was observed at high concentrations where all colored fractions were used together in the representative composition as compared to individual colored fractions. Moreover, it should once more be noted that the compositions presented herein had similar inhibitory properties as compared to the reference compound.











TABLE 71








Kinase Activity




Luminescence
% Activity











Compounds
Repeat1
Repeat2
Repeat1
Repeat2














No Compound
19821
17710
95
105


DC-5, 0.0004%
20319
18662
92
101


DC-5, 0.002%
21569
20952
86
89


DC-5, 0.01%
27118
24076
59
74


DC-9, 0.0004%
22093
20295
84
93


DC-9, 0.002%
31746
29312
37
49


DC-9, 0.01%
37123
35475
10
18


DC-13, 0.0004%
27065
25415
59
68


DC-13, 0.002%
37759
34432
7
24


DC-13, 0.01%
36702
35308
12
19


DC-21, 0.0004%
16635
19342
110
97


DC-21, 0.002%
17067
20286
108
93


DC-21, 0.01%
23118
25700
79
66


Staurosporine, 1 nM
21164
24810
88
70


Staurosporine, 10 nM
28640
32000
52
35


Staurosporine, 100 nM
36908
39509
11
0


Background
39443
39051


















TABLE 72








Kinase Activity




Luminescence
% Activity











Compounds
Repeat1
Repeat2
Repeat1
Repeat2














No Compound
5301
6612
102
98


DC-5, 0.0004%
6760
6751
98
98


DC-5, 0.002%
7887
9950
94
88


DC-5, 0.01%
9442
8832
89
91


DC-9, 0.0004%
17918
16309
63
68


DC-9, 0.002%
33289
32043
16
20


DC-9, 0.01%
34796
35989
12
8


DC-13, 0.0004%
30946
29748
24
27


DC-13, 0.002%
35743
34642
9
12


DC-13, 0.01%
36184
36167
7
8


DC-21, 0.0004%
6344
8335
99
93


DC-21, 0.002%
7862
9809
94
88


DC-21, 0.01%
13577
16488
77
68


Staurosporine, 1 nM
9482
10430
89
86


Staurosporine, 10 nM
17529
16180
65
69


Staurosporine, 100 nM
34660
34762
12
12


Background
39026
38243


















TABLE 73








Kinase Activity




Luminescence
% Activity











Compounds
Repeat1
Repeat2
Repeat1
Repeat2














No Compound
16444
18933
106
94


DC-5, 0.0004%
18578
17845
96
99


DC-5, 0.002%
19889
20404
89
87


DC-5, 0.01%
22322
22047
78
79


DC-9, 0.0004%
30974
32880
37
27


DC-9, 0.002%
34085
35077
22
17


DC-9, 0.01%
34611
35273
19
16


DC-13, 0.0004%
34002
34554
22
19


DC-13, 0.002%
35870
36421
13
11


DC-13, 0.01%
36418
36584
11
10


DC-21, 0.0004%
16774
19477
104
91


DC-21, 0.002%
18739
21558
95
82


DC-21, 0.01%
23945
29444
70
44


Staurosporine, 1 nM
21050
24827
84
66


Staurosporine, 10 nM
32876
34538
27
20


Staurosporine, 100 nM
37496
39233
5
0


Background
39074
38166



















TABLE 74










% Inhibition












Compounds
JAK1
JAK2
JAK3
















DC-5, 0.0004%
4
2
2



DC-5, 0.002%
12
9
12



DC-5, 0.01%
33
10
21



DC-9, 0.0004%
12
34
68



DC-9, 0.002%
57
82
81



DC-9, 0.01%
86
90
82



DC-13, 0.0004%
36
75
79



DC-13, 0.002%
85
89
88



DC-13, 0.01%
84
92
90



DC-21, 0.0004%
0
4
2



DC-21, 0.002%
0
9
12



DC-21, 0.01%
28
28
43



Staurosporine, 1 nM
21
12
25



Staurosporine, 10 nM
56
33
77



Staurosporine, 100 nM
94
88
97











CD39:


In further experiments, the inventor sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on the enzymatic activity of recombinant human CD39 using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 74-77 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (*POM-1 was used as reference compound). Table 74 shows the representative composition at standard concentrations, and Table 75 shows the representative composition at low concentrations. Table 76 shows colored fractions of the representative composition at standard concentrations. Here, D5 is the Yellow Blend, D9 is the Purple Blend, D21 is the Green Blend, D13 is the Red Blend, and D31 is CBD. As before, the red blend included Apple Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Tomato Powder, Beet; the green blend included Olive Extract, Rosemary Extract, Green Coffee Bean Extract, Kale; the orange/yellow blend included Onion Extract, Ginger Extract, Grapefruit Extract, Carrot; and the purple/blue blend included Grape, Blueberry Extract, Currant, Elderberry. Table 77 lists CD39.













TABLE 75






Form

Dissolving
Test


Compound
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004,


lot#33890000X11020



0.002 and






0.01%



Powder
1 mM
Water
0.001, 0.01


POM-1*



and 0.1 μM




















TABLE 76






Form

Dissolving
Test


Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.00000046,


lot#33890000X11020



0.000014,






0.00004,






0.00013, and






0.0004%


POM-1*
Powder
1 mM
Water
0.001, 0.01






and 0.1 μM




















TABLE 77






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







D5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D9
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D13
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D21
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D31
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


POM-1*
Powder
1 mM
Water
0.001, 0.01 and 0.1 μM


AMPCP*
Powder
100 mM
Water
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 78








Enzyme Used



Assay
Catalog #
Enzyme Lot #
(ng)/Reaction
Substrate







CD39
71284
180406
10
70 μM ATP









Assay Conditions: In general, all assays points were done by following the CD39 and CD73 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit protocol (BPS Bioscience, #79278 and 72055, respectively). The CD39 enzymatic reactions were conducted in duplicate at room temperature for 30 minutes in a 50 μl mixture containing assay buffer, ATP, CD39 enzymes, and the test compound. Test compounds were preincubated with the enzyme for 30 minutes. Reactions were started by addition of the substrate. The 50 μl reactions were carried out in a 96-well transparent plate. After enzymatic reactions, 100 μl of Colorimetric Detection Reagent was added to the reaction mix. After a 15 minutes incubation, absorbance was measured using a Tecan plate reader at 630 nm.


Data Analysis: Enzyme activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The Absorbance intensity data were analyzed and compared. In the absence of the compound, the intensity in each data set was defined as 100% (Ce) activity. In the absence of enzyme, the intensity in each data set was defined as 0% (C0) activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(C−C0)/(Ce−C0), where C=the intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table).


Remarkably high and significant inhibitory activity was found for CD39 across all tested concentrations as is shown in Tables 77-78 below, with Table 78 and FIG. 27 depicting the results for standard concentrations and Table 79 and FIG. 28 showing results for low concentrations. As can be readily seen from the results, inhibition relative to the reference inhibitor was unexpectedly strong relative to known reference inhibitor POM-1. Notably, the IC50 concentration for the composition was at 0.000044%. When tested for inhibitory activity for the colored fractions, the inhibitory activity partitioned partially, but not completely, to selected fractions as can be seen from the results in Table 80 and FIG. 29.












TABLE 79








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
CD39












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Inhibition (%)















No compound
0.51
0.55
95
105



HP Color Blend,
0.01
0.01
1
1
99


0.0004%







HP Color Blend,
0.01
0.01
2
2
98


0.002%







HP Color Blend,
0.02
0.01
3
2
98


0.01%







POM-1, 0.001 μM
0.42
0.41
79
78
21


POM-1, 0.01 μM
0.26
0.30
49
56
47


POM-1, 0.1 μM
0.08
0.10
14
19
84


Blank
0.00
0.00






















TABLE 80








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
0.289
0.277
102
98



HP Color Blend,
0.247
0.227
87
80
16


0.0000046%







HP Color Blend,
0.236
0.226
83
80
18


0.000014%







HP Color Blend,
0.138
0.149
48
53
49


0.000044%







HP Color Blend,
0.040
0.043
14
15
85


0.00013%







HP Color Blend,
0.025
0.024
8
8
92


0.0004%







POM-1, 0.001 μM
0.281
0.254
99
90
5


POM-1, 0.01 μM
0.154
0.145
54
51
47


POM-1, 0.1 μM
0.073
0.073
26
26
74


Blank
0.001
0.001






















TABLE 81








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
0.54
0.53
100
100



D5, 0.0004%
0.48
0.44
88
81
15


D5, 0.002%
0.48
0.44
90
83
14


D5, 0.01%
0.48
0.48
90
89
11


D9, 0.0004%
0.43
0.41
80
77
21


D9, 0.002%
0.30
0.31
56
57
44


D9, 0.01%
0.20
0.21
37
38
62


D13, 0.0004%
0.01
0.01
1
1
99


D13, 0.002%
0.00
0.01
0
2
99


D13, 0.01%
0.01
0.00
1
0
99


D21, 0.0004%
0.26
0.26
49
49
51


D21, 0.002%
0.23
0.25
42
46
56


D21, 0.01%
0.25
0.22
47
40
57


D31, 0.0004%
0.50
0.49
93
91
8


D31, 0.002%
0.48
0.49
90
92
9


D31, 0.01%
0.52
0.55
96
103
1


POM-1, 0.001 μM
0.51
0.49
96
92
6


POM-1, 0.01 μM
0.19
0.20
36
37
64


POM-1, 0.1 μM
0.08
0.06
16
10
87


Blank
0.00
0.00












The inventor then further investigated whether one or more specific plant materials and their polyphenols were associated with the inhibitory activity against CD39. To that end, the inventor tested two components of the red colored blend: Apple Extract (DCH-IC50X) and Pomegranate extract (DCH-IC50Y) at the low concentration ranges as shown in Table 81 with otherwise identical assay conditions. Results are shown in Table 82 and FIG. 30.













TABLE 82






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DCH-IC50X (Apple
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0000046,


Extract of RED Blend)



0.000014,


DCH-IC50Y
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.00004,


(Pomegranate Extract



0.00013, and


of RED Blend)



0.0004%


POM-1*
Powder
1 mM
Water
0.001, 0.01






and 0.1 μM



















TABLE 83








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
0.30
0.29
102
98
0


DCH-IC50X, 0.0000046%
0.28
0.28
95
95
5


DCH-IC50X, 0.000014%
0.28
0.27
97
92
6


DCH-IC50X, 0.00004%
0.27
0.27
92
91
8


DCH-IC50X, 0.00013%
0.27
0.26
91
88
11


DCH-IC50X, 0.0004%
0.25
0.26
85
88
13


DCH-IC50Y, 0.0000046%
0.07
0.07
22
24
77


DCH-IC50Y, 0.000014%
0.03
0.03
8
8
92


DCH-IC50Y, 0.00004%
0.03
0.03
7
8
92


DCH-IC50Y, 0.00013%
0.03
0.03
8
9
91


DCH-IC50Y, 0.0004%
0.03
0.03
9
10
91


POM-1, 0.001 μM
0.25
0.26
86
89
13


POM-1, 0.01 μM
0.20
0.19
67
66
33


POM-1, 0.1 μM
0.09
0.09
30
29
70


Blank
0.01
0.00












In still further experiments, the inventor also investigated whether CD39 could also be inhibited by a multivitamin mix. To that end, a comparative experiment was conducted between a multivitamin mix (denoted as DCH-TIV-1.0 (Adult Centrum Multivitamin)) and the representative composition (denoted as DCH-TIC-0.5) using the same experimental procedure for CD39 as described above. The compositions are shown in Table 83.













TABLE 84






Form

Dissolving



Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







DCH-TIC-0.5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02






and 0.1%


DCH-TIV-1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02


(Adult Centrum



and 0.1%


Multivitamin)






POM-1*
Solution
1 mM
Water
0.001, 0.01






and 0.1 μM









The results for this comparison are shown in Table 84 and FIG. 31. As can be clearly seen form the results, the representative composition had very strong inhibitory effect on CD39 whereas the multivitamin composition had substantially no significant inhibitory effect.












TABLE 85








Net Signal (Absorbance)
Activity (%)













Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Inhibition (%)















No compound
0.32
0.32
99
101
0


DCH-TIC-0.5, 0.0004%
0.04
0.04
9
10
90


DCH-TIC-0.5, 0.002%
0.04
0.04
10
9
91


DCH-TIC-0.5, 0.01%
0.05
0.05
15
15
85


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.0004%
0.30
0.30
93
92
8


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.002%
0.30
0.29
92
91
8


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.01%
0.31
0.31
96
98
3


POM-1, 0.001 μM
0.27
0.29
85
89
13


POM-1, 0.01 μM
0.21
0.22
65
68
34


POM-1, 0.1 μM
0.13
0.13
39
38
61


Blank
0.01
0.01










CD73:


In still further experiments, the inventor further sought to determine whether the representative compositions had an effect on the enzymatic activity of recombinant human CD73 using an in vitro enzymatic assay.


Reagents used are shown in Tables 85-89 below and tested as stated unless indicated otherwise (*AMPCP or Quercetin were used as reference compound). Table 85 shows the representative composition at standard concentrations, and Table 86 shows colored fractions of the representative composition at standard concentrations. Here, D5 is the Yellow Blend, D9 is the Purple Blend, D21 is the Green Blend, D13 is the Red Blend, and D31 is CBD. As before, the red blend included Apple Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Tomato Powder, Beet; the green blend included Olive Extract, Rosemary Extract, Green Coffee Bean Extract, Kale; the orange/yellow blend included Onion Extract, Ginger Extract, Grapefruit Extract, Carrot; and the purple/blue blend included Grape, Blueberry Extract, Currant, Elderberry. Table 87 lists CD73.













TABLE 86








Dissolving



Compound
Form Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Test Range







HP Color Blend
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


lot#33890000X11020






Quercetin*
Powder
100 mM
Water
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 87






Form

Dissolving
Test


Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Range







D5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D9
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D13
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D21
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


D31
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.0004, 0.002 and 0.01%


AMPCP*
Powder
100 mM
Water
1, 10 and 100 μM




















TABLE 88








Enzyme Used



Assay
Catalog #
Enzyme Lot #
(ng)/Reaction
Substrate



















CD73
71184
190123
3
100 μM ADP









Assay Conditions: In general, all assays points were done by following the CD39 and CD73 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit protocol (BPS Bioscience, #79278 and 72055, respectively). The CD73 enzymatic reactions were conducted in duplicate at room temperature for 30 minutes in a 50 μl mixture containing assay buffer, ADP, CD73 enzymes, and the test compound. Test compounds were preincubated with the enzyme for 30 minutes. Reactions were started by addition of the substrate. The 50 μl reactions were carried out in a 96-well transparent plate. After enzymatic reactions, 100 μl of Colorimetric Detection Reagent was added to the reaction mix. After a 15 minutes incubation, absorbance was measured using a Tecan plate reader at 630 nm.


Data Analysis: Enzyme activity assays were performed in duplicates at each concentration. The Absorbance intensity data were analyzed and compared. In the absence of the compound, the intensity in each data set was defined as 100% (Ce) activity. In the absence of enzyme, the intensity in each data set was defined as 0% (C0) activity. The percent activity in the presence of each compound was calculated according to the following equation: % activity=(C−C0)/(Ce−C0), where C=the intensity in the presence of the compound (all percent activities below zero were shown zero in the table).


As can be see form the results in Tables 88-90, the inhibition of CD73 by the representative composition and its fractions was remarkably high, especially in comparison to the current reference standard. Table 88 and FIG. 32 show the results for CD73 inhibition at standard concentrations and Table 89 and FIG. 33 show the results for CD73 inhibition at low concentrations. Here, the IC50 of the representative composition is at about 0.000044%. Moreover, as can be taken from these results and the results for the colored fractions as shown in Table 90 and FIG. 34, a strong synergy of the colored fractions when used in combination (as in the representative composition) was observed with respect to CD73 inhibition.












TABLE 89








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
CD73












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Inhibition (%)















No compound
0.44
0.43
101
99



HP Color Blend,
0.06
0.06
14
14
86


0.0004%







HP Color Blend,
0.03
0.04
7
9
92


0.002%







HP Color Blend,
0.01
0.00
2
1
99


0.01%







Quercetin, 1 μM
0.40
0.36
92
82
13


Quercetin, 10 μM
0.23
0.25
53
58
44


Quercetin, 100 μM
0.12
0.08
27
17
78


Blank
0.00
0.00






















TABLE 90








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
0.408
0.395
102
98



HP Color Blend,
0.389
0.388
97
97
3


0.0000046%







HP Color Blend,
0.301
0.316
75
79
23


0.000014%







HP Color Blend,
0.169
0.150
42
37
60


0.000044%







HP Color Blend,
0.117
0.153
29
38
67


0.00013%







HP Color Blend,
0.104
0.083
26
20
77


0.0004%







AMPCP, 1 μM
0.368
0.383
92
96
6


AMPCP, 10 μM
0.298
0.306
74
76
25


AMPCP, 100 μM
0.071
0.089
17
22
80


Blank
0.001
0.002






















TABLE 91








Net absorbance
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
Rep. 1
Rep. 2
(%)















No compound
0.33
0.34
99
101



D5, 0.0004%
0.34
0.33
101
97
1


D5, 0.002%
0.33
0.32
100
94
3


D5, 0.01%
0.32
0.32
95
94
5


D9, 0.0004%
0.30
0.27
88
82
15


D9, 0.002%
0.17
0.17
49
51
50


D9, 0.01%
0.01
0.02
3
6
95


D13, 0.0004%
0.28
0.26
83
77
20


D13, 0.002%
0.17
0.19
51
57
46


D13, 0.01%
0.02
0.02
6
5
94


D21, 0.0004%
0.33
0.32
97
96
3


D21, 0.002%
0.33
0.31
98
92
5


D21, 0.01%
0.33
0.34
97
102
1


D31, 0.0004%
0.35
0.34
104
101
0


D31, 0.002%
0.35
0.34
103
100
0


D31, 0.01%
0.35
0.33
106
98
0


AMPCP, 1 μM
0.30
0.30
89
89
11


AMPCP, 10 μM
0.18
0.20
52
59
45


AMPCP, 100 μM
0.04
0.04
13
12
88


Blank
0.01
0.00












To further investigate whether CD73 could also be inhibited by a multivitamin formulation, the inventor performed comparative experiments between the representative composition and a multivitamin composition using the same test procedure as outlined above. Table 91 lists the reagents used in this experiment (DCH-TIV-0.5 denotes the representative composition, and DCH-TIV-1.0 denotes Adult Centrum Multivitamin).













TABLE 92






Form

Dissolving
Test


Sample
Supplied
Stock Conc.
Solvent
Range







DCH-TIV-0.5
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02 and 0.1%


DCH-TIV-1.0
Powder
1% (w/v)
70% EtOH
0.004, 0.02 and 0.1%


(Adult Centrum






Multivitamin)






AMPCP*
Powder
10 mM
Water
0.1, 1 and 10 μM









As can be readily seen form the results in Table 92 and FIG. 35 the representative composition had substantial inhibitory activity with regard to CD73, however, only minor inhibitory activity with the multivitamin composition was observed.












TABLE 93








Net Signal





(Absorbance)
Activity (%)
Inhibition












Condition
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
(%)















No compound
0.18
0.17
101
99
0


DCH-TIV-0.5, 0.0004%
0.02
0.02
10
11
89


DCH-TIV-0.5, 0.002%
0.01
0.01
4
5
96


DCH-TIV-0.5, 0.01%
0.02
0.02
10
10
90


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.0004%
0.17
0.17
97
95
4


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.002%
0.17
0.16
93
92
7


DCH-TIV-1.0, 0.01%
0.20
0.18
112
103
0


AMPCP, 0.1 μM
0.14
0.17
81
96
12


AMPCP, 1 μM
0.09
0.11
53
64
41


AMPCP, 10 μM
0.04
0.05
20
28
76


Blank
0.00
0.00












In some embodiments, the numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as concentration, reaction conditions, and so forth, used to describe and claim certain embodiments of the invention are to be understood as being modified in some instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters set forth in the written description and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by a particular embodiment. The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein.


As used herein, the term “administering” a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition refers to both direct and indirect administration of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition, wherein direct administration of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition is typically performed by a health care professional (e.g., physician, nurse, dietitian, etc.), and wherein indirect administration includes a step of providing or making available the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition to the health care professional or individual in need thereof for direct administration (e.g., via injection, infusion, oral delivery, topical delivery, etc.). It should further be noted that the terms “prognosing” or “predicting” a condition, a susceptibility for development of a disease, or a response to an intended treatment is meant to cover the act of predicting or the prediction (but not treatment or diagnosis of) the condition, susceptibility and/or response, including the rate of progression, improvement, and/or duration of the condition in a subject.


All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g. “such as”) provided with respect to certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.


As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As also used herein, and unless the context dictates otherwise, the term “coupled to” is intended to include both direct coupling (in which two elements that are coupled to each other contact each other) and indirect coupling (in which at least one additional element is located between the two elements). Therefore, the terms “coupled to” and “coupled with” are used synonymously.


It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification or claims refer to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.

Claims
  • 1. A method of modulating one or more pathways associated with health and healthy aging in an individual, comprising: identifying a signaling component and/or an enzyme in a pathway associated with healthy ageing in an individual, wherein the healthy ageing of the individual is attributed to a Mediterranean diet;selecting a plurality of polyphenols from plant materials, wherein the plant materials are selected based on the Mediterranean diet, and wherein the plant materials have a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and/or a purple-blue color;testing the plurality of polyphenols for inhibition in which the polyphenols synergistically inhibit the signaling component and/or enzyme in the one or more pathways, and wherein inhibition contributes to the healthy ageing in the individual;formulating the plurality of polyphenols into an orally administrable composition upon determination of the plurality of polyphenols as being synergistic inhibitors of the signaling component and/or enzyme; andadministering the orally administrable composition to the individual to thereby modulate the one or more pathway; andwherein the synergistic inhibition is with respect to at least one of ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT1, BACE1, Cathepsin S, CDK5, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, CD38, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, CD39, and CD73, and Keap/Nrf2 binding.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the pathway is associated with immune function, cellular stress regulation, cognition and/or central nervous system function, atherosclerotic plaque formation and/or destabilization, inflammation, and/or cellular energy.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, identifying at least a second enzyme/signaling component in the pathway.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, identifying at least a second enzyme/signaling component in at least a second distinct pathway.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the plant materials having a red color are selected from the group consisting of an apple extract, a pomegranate extract, a tomato powder, and a beet root powder, wherein the plant materials having a green color are selected from the group consisting of an olive extract, a rosemary extract, a green coffee bean extract, and a kale powder, wherein the plant materials having an orange-yellow color are selected from the group consisting of an onion extract, a ginger extract, a grapefruit extract, and a carrot powder, and wherein the plant materials having a purple-blue color are selected from the group consisting of a grape extract, a blueberry extract, a currant powder, and an elderberry powder.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the polyphenols are provided in form of the plant materials.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the polyphenols comprise at least one phenolic compound as listed in Table 3, at least one flavonoid as listed in Table 4, at least one anthocyanin as listed in Table 5, at least one chlorogenic acid as listed in Table 6, or wherein the plant materials comprise at least one betacyanin as listed in Table 7, and/or at least one amino acid/alkaloid as listed in Table 8.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the orally administrable composition is formulated such that a dosage unit provides between 10-1,000 mg of the polyphenols.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the orally administrable composition further comprises one or more additional ingredients selected form the group of a vitamin, a dietary trace element or mineral, a nicotinamide riboside, a probiotic, and/or a prebiotic.
  • 10. A method of modulating one or more pathways associated with healthy aging in an individual, comprising: administering to the individual a plurality of polyphenols from plant materials, wherein the plant materials are selected based on a Mediterranean diet, and wherein the plant materials have a red color, a green color, an orange-yellow color, and/or a purple-blue color;wherein the polyphenols in the plurality of plant materials synergistically inhibit a signaling component and/or an enzyme in the one or more pathways, and wherein inhibition of the signaling component and/or the enzyme contributes to healthy ageing in the individual; andwherein the synergistic inhibition is with respect to at least one of ARG-1, ARG-2, SIRT1, BACE1, Cathepsin S, CDK5, IDO1, IDO2, NAMPT, PCSK9, CD47, CD38, JAK2, JAK3, CD39, and CD73, and Keap/Nrf2 binding.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the pathway is associated with immune function, cellular stress regulation, cognition and/or central nervous system function, atherosclerotic plaque formation and/or destabilization, inflammation, and/or cellular energy.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of polyphenols inhibit at least two distinct signaling components and/or enzymes.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of polyphenols inhibit at least two distinct signaling components and/or enzymes in at least two distinct pathways.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of polyphenols are chemically distinct and being orally administered.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of polyphenols are chemically distinct and being administered at a daily dosage of between 50 and 1,000 mg.
  • 16. The method of claim 10, further comprising a step of co-administering to the individual a vitamin, a dietary trace element or mineral, a nicotinamide riboside, a probiotic, and/or a prebiotic.
  • 17. The method of claim 10, wherein the polyphenols comprise at least one phenolic compound as listed in Table 3, at least one flavonoid as listed in Table 4, at least one anthocyanin as listed in Table 5, and/or at least one chlorogenic acid as listed in Table 6, or wherein the plant materials comprise at least one betacyanin as listed in Table 7, and/or at least one amino acid/alkaloid as listed in Table 8.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority to our allowed and co-pending U.S. patent application with the Ser. No. 17/508,543, which was filed Oct. 22, 2021, which claims priority to U.S. Pat. No. 11,202,816, filed Jun. 28, 2021, which claims priority to U.S. Pat. No. 11,065,295, filed Feb. 4, 2021, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Applications with the Ser. No. 62/970,615, filed Feb. 5, 2020, Ser. No. 63/010,183, filed Apr. 15, 2020, and Ser. No. 63/086,207, filed Oct. 1, 2020, each of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
20130017284 Zemel Jan 2013 A1
20130184228 Fisher Jul 2013 A1
20150190450 Chang Jul 2015 A1
20180078649 Zu Mar 2018 A1
20180318323 Roman et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190015384 Mehansho Jan 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
108541953 Sep 2018 CN
1020090078939 Jul 2009 KR
1020180020718 Feb 2018 KR
WO-2007042272 Apr 2007 WO
WO-2010121007 Oct 2010 WO
2019092896 May 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
Lou et al, Chlorogenic acid and luteolin synergistically inhibit the proliferation of interleukin-1β-induced fibroblast-like synoviocytes through regulating the activation of NF-κB and JAK/STAT-signaling pathways. Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology, (2015) vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 499-507 (Year: 2015).
Esposito et al, Synergistic interplay between curcumin and polyphenol-rich foods in the Mediterranean diet: therapeutic prospects for Neurofibromatosis 1 patients. Nutrients (2017), vol. 9, No. 7, 783 p (Year: 2017).
Fletcher et al., STAT3 inhibition reduces macrophage number and tumor growth in neurofibroma. Oncogene, (20190400) vol. 38, No. 15, pp. 2876-2884 (Year: 2019).
Ahmad et al., “Assessment of Risk Factors and Biomarkers Associated With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among Women Consuming a Mediterranean Diet,” Dec. 7, 2018; 1(8); 14 pgs.
Allard et al., “The ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73: novel checkpoint inhibitor targets,” Immunol Rev., Mar. 2017; 276(1):121-144.
Anhe et al., “Triggering Akkermansia with dietary polyphenols: A new weapon to combat the metabolic syndrome?” Gut Microbes, 2016; 7(2):146-153.
Antonioli et al., “CD39 and CD73 in immunity and inflammation,” Trends Mol Med., Jun. 2013; 19(6):355-367.
Arora et al., “Combinatorial Epigenetics Impact of Polyphenols and Phytochemicals in Cancer Prevention and Therapy,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019; 20:4567; 42 pgs.
Beecher, Gary R., “Overview of Dietary Flavonoids: Nomenclature, Occurrence and Intake,” The Journal of Nutrition, Oct. 2003; 133(10):3248S-3254S.
Biagi et al., “Gut Microbiota and Extreme Longevity,” Current Biology, Jun. 6, 2016; 26:1480-1485.
Billingsley et al., “The antioxidant potential of Mediterranean diet in patients at high cardiovascular risk: an in-depth review of the PREDIMED,” Nutrition and Diabetes, 2018; 8:13; 8 pgs.
Bose et al., “Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy,” Cells, 2020; 9,1451; 40 pgs.
Caldwell et al., “Arginase: A Multifaceted Enzyme Important in Health and Disease,” Physiol. Rev., 2018; 98:641-665.
Cham et al., “Immunotherapeutic Blockade of CD47 Inhibitory Signaling Enhances Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses to Viral Infection,” Cell Reports, 2020; 31, 107494; 14 pgs.
Chini et al., “The NADase CD38 is induced by factors secreted from senescent cells providing a potential link between senescence and age-related cellular NAD+ decline,” Biochem Biophys Res Common., May 28, 2019; 513(2):486-493.
Chini et al., “The Pharamacology of CD38/NADase: An emerging target for cancer and aging diseases,” Trends Pharmacol Sci., Apr. 2018; 39(4):424-436.
Crooke et al., “Low expression of CD39 and CD73 genes in centenarians compared with octogenarians,” Immunity & Ageing; 2017; 14:11; 5 pgs.
Fytexia, OXXYNEA Information Sheet, retrieved from the internet on Oct. 24, 2019, 4 pgs. www.fytexia.com—www.oxxynea.com.
Gomez-Pinilla et al., “Natural mood foods: The actions of polyphenols against psychiatric and cognitive disorders,” May 2012; 15(3):127-133.
Goncalves et al., “Chapter 6: Phenolic Compounds—Biological Activity: Inhibitory Properties of Phenolic Compounds Against Enzymes Linked with Human Diseases,” Intech Open Science, 2017, pp. 99-118.
Gonzalez de Mejia et al., “The Colors of Health: Chemistry, Bioactivity, and Market Demand for Colorful Foods and Natural Food Sources of Colorants,” Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol., 2020; 15:47; 11:10.1-10.38.
Gu et al., “Mediterranean Diet, Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers, and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease,” J Alzheimers Dis., 2010; 22(2):483-492.
Hogan et al., “The Multi-faceted Ecto-enzyme CD38: Roles in Immunomodulation, Cancer, Aging, and Metabolic Diseases,” Frontiers in Immunology, May 2019; 10, Art. 1187; 12 pgs.
Huang et al., “Curcumin inhibits BACE1 expression through the interaction between ERBeta and NFkB signaling pathway in SH-SY5Y cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 2020; 463:161-173.
Jobs, et al., “Association Between Serum Cathepsin S and Mortality in Older Adults,” JAMA, Sep. 14, 2011; 306(10):1113-1121.
Koelsch, Gerald, “BACE1 Function and Inhibition: Implications of Intervention in the Amyloid Pathway of Alzheimer's Disease Pathology,” Molecules, 2017; 22, 1723; 20 pgs.
Lahoz et al., “Relationship of the Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet and Its Main Components with CRP Levels in the Spanish Population,” Nutrients, 2018; 10, 379; 9 pgs.
Lakey-Beitia et al., “Polyphenols as Therapeutic Molecules in Alzheimer's Disease, Through Modulating Amyloid Pathways” Mol. Neurobiol., 2015; 51:466-479.
Marttila et al., “Aging-associated increase in indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) activity appears to be unrelated to the transcription of the IDO1 or IDO2 genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” Immunity & Ageing, 2011; 8:9; 4 pgs.
Masi et al., “Aging Modulates the Influence of Arginase on Endothelial Dysfunction in Obesity,” Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol., 2018; 38:2474-2483.
Mushtaq et al., “Neuroprotective Mechanisms Mediated by CDK5 Inhibition,” Curr Pharm Des., 2016; 22(5):527-534.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2021/016670, International filing date Feb. 4, 2021,11 pages.
Prendergast et al., “Discovery of IDO1 inhibitors: from bench to bedside,” Cancer Res., Dec. 15, 2017; 77(24):6795-6811.
Schwartz et al., “JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases,” Nat Rev Drug Discov., Dec. 28, 2017; 17(1):78; 41 pgs.
Sreekumar, et al., “Pomegranate Fruit as a Rich Source of Biologically Active Compounds,” BioMed Research International, 2014; 12 pgs.
Sureda et al., “Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Inflammatory Markers,” Nutrients, Jan. 10, 2018; 10, 62; 13 pgs.
Xu et al., “Perspective: Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway to fight age-related dysfunction,” Pharmacol Res., Sep. 2016; 111:152-154.
Zhao et al., “What Else Can CD39 Tell US?” Frontiers in Immunology, Jun. 2017; vol. 8; 10 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220125871 A1 Apr 2022 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
63086207 Oct 2020 US
63010183 Apr 2020 US
62970615 Feb 2020 US
Divisions (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 17508543 Oct 2021 US
Child 17567751 US
Parent 17360261 Jun 2021 US
Child 17508543 US
Parent 17167998 Feb 2021 US
Child 17360261 US