COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION

Abstract
The disclosure provides methods for treating depression comprising intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive, and wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates methods for treating depression using esketamine wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects about 7-15% of the general population. MDD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and the leading cause of disability worldwide. About one third of patients fail to achieve remission despite treatment with multiple antidepressant medications and are considered to have treatment resistant depression (TRD). Such patients who do benefit with oral ADs have high rates of relapse even with continuation of treatment.


The impact of TRD on patient's lives is difficult to adequately describe. Many patients have depressive episodes lasting years. Severely depressed patients lose the will to carry on with their lives, there is a 7-fold increase in suicide attempts. Life expectancy is lowered by 10 years. In extreme cases they cannot even engage in basic self-care activities such as bathing or eating, or taking care of themselves, leave alone those in their care as a parent, spouse etc. This impacts not only the patient themselves, but also the family and those dependent on them. They also lose the ability to experience pleasure in doing the things that used to enjoy, which robs people of the essence of life and what drives it. In effect their lives are taken away from them by TRD.


There remains a need for improved treatments for patients having depression, in particular patients having TRD.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In some aspects, the present disclosure is directed to methods for treating depression comprising intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level. In certain embodiments, the method has an induction phase and, optionally, a subsequent maintenance phase, wherein the induction phase comprises induction phase treatment sessions at a given frequency, and the maintenance phase comprises maintenance phase treatment sessions administered to the patient less frequently.


In further aspects, the method comprises intranasally administering about 28 mg to about 84 mg of esketamine per induction phase treatment session to said patient, wherein the induction phase treatment session occurs at a frequency of twice weekly during an the induction phase; and, optionally intranasally administering about 56 mg to about 84 mg of esketamine per maintenance phase treatment session to said patient, wherein the maintenance phase treatment session occurs at a frequency of once weekly or once every other week. In certain aspects, the induction phase has a duration of about 4 weeks.


In certain aspects, about 56 or about 84 mg of esketamine is administered per induction phase treatment session. In further aspects, about 56 or about 84 mg of esketamine is administered per maintenance phase treatment session.


In some embodiments, the esketamine is delivered from an intranasal device in 2 or more sprays during the induction phase and/or the maintenance phase. In certain aspects, said methods further comprise administering a therapeutically effective amount of an oral antidepressant to said patient during the induction and/or maintenance phase. In certain aspects, the esketamine is administered as its corresponding hydrochloride salt during the induction phase and/or the maintenance phase.


In still further aspects, wherein the depression comprises major depressive disorder. In certain aspects, the major depressive disorder is major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation or behavior. In further aspects, the major depressive disorder is treatment resistant depression.


In certain aspects, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having: (a) a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level, and (b) at least one of: (i) a level of TNF-alpha that is greater than a reference TNF-alpha level, and (ii) a level of sIL6R that is greater than a reference sIL6R level.


In certain aspects, the reference CRP level is about 3 mg/L. In further aspects, the reference TNF-alpha level is about 4 μg/mL. In still further aspects, the reference sIL6R level is about 25 ng/mL.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is the trial design for Example 1. At entry to the trial, transferred entry non-responder subjects continued to receive the same oral antidepressant initiated in the ESKETINTRD3005 study. The new oral AD is for direct entry subjects only.



FIG. 2 shows means for the MADRS total score overtime in the IND and OP/MA phases based on observed case data for Example 1.



FIG. 3 shows the response for patients having a response with a ≥50% reduction from baseline and a remission with a MADRS of ≤12.



FIG. 4 shows means for the PHQ-9 total score over time in the IND and OP/MA phases based on observed case data for Example 1.



FIG. 5 shows the 3MM effect across various clinical trials. For ESKETINTRD2003, only subjects with consistent treatment across two phases of double-blind were considered. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers for each of the exemplified trials are as follows: 54135419SUI3001 (NCT03039192); 54135419SUI3002 (NCT03097133); ESKETINSUI2001 (NCT02133001); 54135419TRD2005 (NCT02918318); ESKETINTRD2003 (NCT01998958); ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064); and ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585).



FIG. 6 shows 3MM biomarker signature positive subjects (TE SigPos), biomarker signature negative subjects (TE SigNeg) and the difference between subtypes (signature advantage) for various clinical trials. Overall, treatment effect in 3MM+ patients at end DB was 7.8 MADRS points, significantly greater (p<0.01) than treatment effect of 2.0 MADRS points in 3MM-patients. An effect was evident in 3 out of 4 TRD studies. In ESKETINTRD2003, only subjects with consistent treatment across two phases of double-blind were considered.



FIG. 7A is a graph showing the changes in MADRS for placebo (PBO) versus treatment (TRT) biomarker signature positive patients in the ESKETINTRD2003 trial. FIG. 7B is a graph showing the changes in MADRS for placebo (PBO) versus treatment (TRT) biomarker signature negative patients in the ESKETINTRD2003 trial.



FIG. 8A shows the 2MM effect across various clinical trials. FIG. 8B shows the 3MM effect across various clinical trials. High.Diff (PBO-TRT) refers to TE SigPos subjects, Other.Diff (PBO-TRT) refers to TE SigNeg subjects, and High.Diff-Other.Diff (PBO-TRT) refers to signature advantage. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers for each of the exemplified trials are as follows: CNTO136MDD2001 (NCT02473289); 67953964MDD2001 (NCT03559192); 42847922MDD2001 (NCT03227224); 42847922MDD2002 (NCT03321526); 54135419SUI3001 (NCT03039192); 54135419SUI3002 (NCT03097133); ESKETINSUI2001 (NCT02133001); 54135419TRD2005 (NCT02918318); ESKETINTRD2003 (NCT01998958); ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064); and ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585).



FIG. 9 shows the CRP effect across various clinical trials. High.Diff (PBO-TRT) refers to TE SigPos subjects, Other.Diff (PBO-TRT) refers to TE SigNeg subjects, and High.Diff-Other.Diff (PBO-TRT) refers to signature advantage. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers for each of the exemplified trials are as follows: CNTO136MDD2001 (NCT02473289); 67953964MDD2001 (NCT03559192); 42847922MDD2001 (NCT03227224); 42847922MDD2002 (NCT03321526); 54135419SUI3001 (NCT03039192); 54135419SUI3002 (NCT03097133); ESKETINSUI2001 (NCT02133001); 54135419TRD2005 (NCT02918318); ESKETINTRD2003 (NCT01998958); ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064); and ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The disclosure is directed to methods for the treatment of depression (e.g., major depressive disorder), comprising administering to a patient in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine. In some embodiments, the methods are for the treatment of treatment refractory depression or treatment resistant depression. In other embodiments, the medicament is for treating suicidal ideation. These methods advantageously permit tailoring an effective regimen to patients who have depression. Such patients include those who have already been diagnosed with MDD, TRD, are suicidal, or have otherwise been untreated for depression. For example, the methods are directed to patients with major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation or behavior.


In one aspect of the present invention, methods are provided for treating depression comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level.


In a further aspect of the present invention, methods are provided for treating depression comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level.


Further described herein is esketamine for use in the treatment of depression, comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level.


Further described herein is esketamine for use in the treatment of depression, comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level.


In certain embodiments, the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive.


In certain aspects, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having: (a) a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level, and (b) at least one of: (i) a level of TNF-alpha that is greater than a reference TNF-alpha level, and (ii) a level of sIL6R that is greater than a reference sIL6R level.


In certain embodiments, described herein are methods of identifying a patient as a candidate for treatment with esketamine if the subject is biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having: (a) a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level, and (b) at least one of (i) a level of TNF-alpha that is greater than a reference TNF-alpha level, and (ii) a level of sIL6R that is greater than a reference sIL6R level. In certain embodiments, said method further comprises administering to said patient an effective amount of esketamine.


In certain embodiments, the biomarker signature is an inflammatory biomarker signature (“3MM”) with positive status defined by: CRP>3 mg/L and (TNFα>4 pg/mL or sIL6R>25 ng/mL). In the disclosed methods employing the 3MM biomarker signature, the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having: (a) a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level, and (b) at least one of (i) a level of TNF-alpha that is greater than a reference TNF-alpha level, and (ii) a level of sIL6R that is greater than a reference sIL6R level. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement in MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who received treatment with placebo. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement of about 7.8 MADRS point relative to a comparative population of patients who received treatment with placebo. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement in MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who were administered esketamine, and are not biomarker signature positive. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement of about 7.8 MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who were administered esketamine, and are not biomarker signature positive.


In certain embodiments, the biomarker signature is an inflammatory biomarker signature (“2MM”) with positive status defined by: CRP>3 mg/L and sIL6R>25 ng/mL. In the disclosed methods employing the 2MM biomarker signature, the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level, and a level of sIL6R that is greater than a reference sIL6R level. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement in MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who received treatment with placebo. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement in MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who were administered esketamine, and are not biomarker signature positive.


In certain embodiments, the biomarker signature is an inflammatory biomarker signature (“CRP”) with positive status defined by: CRP>3 mg/L. In the disclosed methods employing the CRP biomarker signature, the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement in MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who received treatment with placebo. In certain embodiments, a patient identified as biomarker signature positive demonstrates an improvement in MADRS points relative to a comparative population of patients who were administered esketamine, and are not biomarker signature positive.


In any of the disclosed embodiments, the reference CRP level is about 3 mg/L.


In any of the disclosed embodiments, the reference TNF-alpha level is about 4 pg/mL.


In any of the disclosed embodiments, the reference sIL6R level is about 25 ng/mL.


In any of the disclosed embodiments, the reference CRP, TNF-alpha, sIL6R and/or dynorphin reference levels may be computed according to the methods disclosed in the Examples.


In any one of the disclosed embodiments, biomarker correlates of any of the biomarkers, e.g., a biomarker correlate of CRP, TNF-alpha, sIL6R, or dynorphin, may be used. As used herein, a “biomarker correlate” of a biomarker is another marker whose level or activity correlates with the level or activity of the biomarker. For example, if the biomarker is X, and the levels of Y correlate with the levels of X, then Y is a biomarker correlate of X.


As used herein, “CRP” refers to C-reactive protein. In certain embodiments, CRP has UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot number P02741.


As used herein, “TNF-alpha” refers to Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha. In certain embodiments, TNF-alpha as UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot number P01375.


As used herein, “IL6R” refers to Interleukin 6 Receptor. In certain embodiments, IL6R has UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot number P08887. As used herein “sIL6R” refers to the soluble form of IL6R.


For each the methods of treatment described herein, it will be understood that the methods of treatment may also be framed as methods of manufacturing a medicament for the treatment of the described indications or as esketamine for use in the treatment of the described indications.


Methods of maintaining stable remission or stable response achieved by a patient with depression following administration of a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine during an initial administration phase also are described. Such methods include continuing administration of a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine for at least five months during a subsequent administration phase.


In embodiments of any of the foregoing methods of treatment, the method has an induction phase and, optionally, a subsequent maintenance phase, wherein the induction phase comprises induction phase treatment sessions at a given frequency, and the maintenance phase comprises maintenance phase treatment sessions administered to the patient less frequently.


In some embodiments, methods for the long term treatment of depression in a patient are also provided. These methods comprise administering to the patient in need of the treatment a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine for at least six months. Desirably, cognitive performance of the patient remains stable, based on a baseline measurement, following six months of treatment. In some embodiments, the treatment may be a duration of at least about one year, at least about 18 months, or at least about two years. For example, long term treatment may include a duration range of about six months to about two years. Treatment may also be continued for longer periods of time including, without limitation, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or longer years, as determined by the attending physician. In some embodiments, the esketamine is initially dosed twice a week for up to four weeks during an induction phase, and, thereafter, dosed less frequently than twice a week.


In further aspects, the method comprises intranasally administering about 28 mg to about 84 mg of esketamine per induction phase treatment session to said patient, wherein the induction phase treatment session occurs at a frequency of twice weekly during an the induction phase; and, optionally intranasally administering about 56 mg to about 84 mg of esketamine per maintenance phase treatment session to said patient, wherein the maintenance phase treatment session occurs at a frequency of once weekly or once every other week. In certain aspects, the induction phase has a duration of about 4 weeks.


In certain aspects, about 56 or about 84 mg of esketamine is administered per induction phase treatment session. In further aspects, about 56 or about 84 mg of esketamine is administered per maintenance phase treatment session.


In certain embodiments, esketamine may be administered in combination with one or more antidepressants, as herein described, preferably in combination with one to three antidepressants, more preferably in combination with one to two antidepressants.


In certain embodiments, esketamine may be administered in combination with one or more antidepressants, and further in combination with one or more atypical antipsychotics, herein described.


In further embodiments, the disclosure is directed to combination therapy comprising esketamine and one or more antidepressants; wherein the esketamine is administered as acute treatment. In other embodiments, the disclosure is directed to combination therapy comprising esketamine and one or more antidepressants wherein the esketamine is administered as acute treatment and wherein the one or more antidepressants are administered as chronic treatment.


In other embodiments, such as during an induction phase, the esketamine may be used as a mono-therapy and not in combination with any other active compounds.


Some of the quantitative expressions given herein are not qualified with the term “about”. It is understood that whether the term “about” is used explicitly or not, every quantity given herein is meant to refer to the actual given value, and it is also meant to refer to the approximation to such given value that would reasonably be inferred based on the ordinary skill in the art, including approximations due to the experimental and/or measurement conditions for such given value.


As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the term “esketamine” shall mean the (S)-enantiomer of ketamine, i.e., a compound of formula (I):




embedded image


also known as (S)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexanone. “Esketamine” shall also mean a salt, e.g., a chloride salt such as the hydrochloride salt, of the (S)-enantiomer of ketamine, i.e., a compound of formula (II):




embedded image


also known as (S)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexanone hydrochloride.


In some embodiments, the esketamine is substantially free of the (R)-enantiomer of ketamine, i.e., a compound of formula (III):




embedded image


In other embodiments, the esketamine contains less than about 10% by weight, based on the weight of the esketamine sample, of the (R)-enantiomer of ketamine. In further embodiments, the esketamine contains less than about 10, about 9, about 8, about 7, about 6, about 5, about 4, about 3, about 2, about 1, about 0.5, about 0.1, about 0.005, or about 0.001% by weight, based on the weight of the esketamine sample, of the (R)-enantiomer of ketamine. In yet other embodiments, the esketamine contains about 0.001 to about 10% by weight, based on the weight of the esketamine sample, of the (R)-enantiomer of ketamine. In still further embodiments, the esketamine contains about 0.001 to about 10%, about 0.001 to about 5%, about 0.001 to about 1, about 0.001 to about 0.5, about 0.001 to about 0.1, about 0.1 to about 5, about 0.1 to about 1, about 0.1 to about 5, or about 0.5 to about 5% by weight, based on the weight of the esketamine sample, of the (R)-enantiomer of ketamine.


The term “esketamine” may also include other pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, which may readily be selected by those skilled in the art. A “pharmaceutically acceptable salt” is intended to mean a salt of esketamine that is non-toxic, biologically tolerable, or otherwise biologically suitable for administration to the subject. See, generally, G. S. Paulekuhn, “Trends in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Salt Selection based on Analysis of the Orange Book Database”, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50:6665-72, S. M. Berge, “Pharmaceutical Salts”, J Pharm Sci., 1977, 66:1-19, and Handbook of Pharmaceutical Salts, Properties, Selection, and Use, Stahl and Wermuth, Eds., Wiley-VCH and VHCA, Zurich, 2002. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable salts are those that are pharmacologically effective and suitable for administration to patients without undue toxicity, irritation, or allergic response.


Examples of other pharmaceutically acceptable salts include sulfates, pyrosulfates, bisulfates, sulfites, bisulfites, phosphates, monohydrogen-phosphates, dihydrogenphosphates, metaphosphates, pyrophosphates, bromides (such as hydrobromides), iodides (such as hydroiodides), acetates, propionates, decanoates, caprylates, acrylates, formates, isobutyrates, caproates, heptanoates, propiolates, oxalates, malonates, succinates, suberates, sebacates, fumarates, maleates, butyne-1,4-dioates, hexyne-1,6-dioates, benzoates, chlorobenzoates, methylbenzoates, dinitrobenzoates, hydroxybenzoates, methoxybenzoates, phthalates, sulfonates, xylenesulfonates, phenylacetates, phenylpropionates, phenylbutyrates, citrates, lactates, γ-hydroxybutyrates, glycolates, tartrates, methane-sulfonates, propanesulfonates, naphthalene-1-sulfonates, naphthalene-2-sulfonates, and mandelates. In particular, the salt of esketamine is a chloride salt such as a hydrochloride salt.


In certain embodiments, the esketamine is administered intranasally. In other embodiments, the esketamine is administered intranasally as its corresponding hydrochloride salt. In further embodiments, the esketamine is administered intranasally as its corresponding hydrochloride salt in an 16.14% weight/volume solution (equivalent to 14% weight/volume of esketamine base).


In some embodiments, the esketamine is delivered from an intranasal device in 2 or more sprays during the induction phase and/or the maintenance phase. In certain aspects, said methods further comprise administering a therapeutically effective amount of an oral antidepressant to said patient during the induction and/or maintenance phase. In certain aspects, the esketamine is administered as its corresponding hydrochloride salt during the induction phase and/or the maintenance phase.


In certain embodiments, the esketamine is administered intranasally as a solution comprising 161.4 mg/mL of esketamine hydrochloride (equivalent to 140 mg/mL of esketamine base), 0.12 mg/mL of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 1.5 mg/mL citric acid, at a pH of 4.5 in water. In other embodiments, the esketamine is administered intranasally, wherein the intranasal delivery administers 100 μL of a solution comprising 161.4 mg/mL of esketamine hydrochloride (equivalent to 140 mg/mL of esketamine base), 0.12 mg/mL of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 1.5 mg/mL citric acid, at a pH of 4.5 in water. In certain embodiments, the esketamine is delivered intranasally using a nasal spray pump, wherein the pump delivers 100 μL of a solution comprising 161.4 mg/mL of esketamine hydrochloride (equivalent to 140 mg/mL of esketamine base), 0.12 mg/mL of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 1.5 mg/mL citric acid, at a pH of 4.5 in water.


In general, a single pump from a nasal spray device may be configured to deliver about 50 μL to about 200 μL of an esketamine solution to a nostril of the subject, including about 60 μL, about 70 μL, about 80 μL, about 90 μL, about 100 μL, about 110 μL, about 120 μL, about 130 μL, about 140 μL, about 150 μL, about 160 μL, about 170 μL, about 180 μL, and about 200 μL. Accordingly, two pumps deliver about 100 μL to about 400 μL to the subject.


In still further aspects, wherein the depression comprises major depressive disorder. In certain aspects, the major depressive disorder is major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation or behavior. In further aspects, the major depressive disorder is treatment resistant depression.


In certain embodiments, a patient in need of treatment with a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine, is a patient suffering from an episode of depression (e.g., major depressive disorder). In other embodiments, a patient in need thereof is suffering from an episode of depression (e.g., major depressive disorder), wherein the episode of depression (e.g., major depressive disorder) has not responded to treatment with at least two oral antidepressants (i.e., the patient has not responded to treatment with at least two oral antidepressants). In other embodiments, a geriatric patient in need thereof is suffering from an episode of depression (e.g., major depressive disorder), wherein the episode of depression (e.g., major depressive disorder) has not responded to treatment with two oral antidepressants (i.e., the geriatric patient has not responded to treatment with two oral antidepressants).


In certain embodiments, a patient in need thereof is suffering from depression (e.g., major depressive disorder). For example, a patient as measured MADRS with a score of 18 or more or on the CGI scale a score of 4 or more.


As used herein, the term “depression” includes major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder, seasonal affective disorder, postpartum depression, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, situational depression, anhedonia, melancholy, mid-life depression, late-life depression, depression due to identifiable stressors, treatment resistant depression, or combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the depression is major depressive disorder. In other embodiments, the major depressive disorder is with melancholic features or anxious distress. In further embodiments, the depression is treatment-resistant depression.


As used herein, the term “non-responder” means patients that do not recover fully on an antidepressant medication (e.g., 25% or less change from baseline in total MADRS score).


As used herein, the term “episode of major depressive disorder” means a continuous period (e.g., about 2 weeks or more) in which a patient has symptoms of a major depressive disorder sufficient to meet criteria for major depression as specified in the Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM 5.


As used herein, “suicide” is the “act of taking one's own life”. See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide-cite_note-7. Suicide includes attempted suicide or non-fatal suicidal behavior, which is self-injury with the desire to end one's life that does not result in death. Suicide attempt is a self-initiated sequence of behaviors by an individual who, at the time of initiation, expected that the set of actions would lead to his or her own death.


As used herein, “suicidal ideation” refers to thoughts about or an unusual preoccupation with suicide, or thoughts of ending one's life or not wanting to live anymore but not necessarily taking any active efforts to do so. The range of suicidal ideation varies greatly from fleeting to chronic and progresses to detailed planning, role playing, and unsuccessful attempts, which may be deliberately constructed to fail or be discovered, or may be fully intended to result in death. In some embodiments, a patient is classified as being “suicidal” when the patient has a mean baseline MADRS total score of about 38 or greater. In other embodiments, a patient is classified as being suicidal when the patient has a mean baseline BBSS score of 22 or greater. In further embodiments, a patient is classified as being suicidal when the patient has a score of 6 or greater in the SIBAT clinical global judgement of suicide risk. In yet other embodiments, the patient has one or more combinations of these scores.


As used herein, the terms “co-therapy”, “combination therapy”, “adjunctive treatment”, “adjunctive therapy”, “combined treatment”, and “co-administration” shall mean treatment of a patient in need thereof by administering esketamine in combination with one or more antidepressant(s), wherein the esketamine and the antidepressant(s) are administered by any suitable means. In some embodiments, esketamine is administered in a regimen with one to five antidepressants. In other embodiments, esketamine is administered in a regimen with one, two, three, four, or five antidepressants. In other embodiments, esketamine is administered in a regimen with one or two antidepressants. In further embodiments, the esketamine is administered in a regimen with the antidepressant currently being administered to the patient. In other embodiments, the esketamine is administered in a regimen with a different antidepressant. In yet further embodiments, the esketamine is administered in a regimen with an antidepressant not previously administered to the patient. In still other embodiments, the esketamine is administered in a regimen with an antidepressant previously administered to the patient. Where the esketamine and the antidepressant(s) are administered in separate dosage forms, the number of dosages administered per day for each compound may be the same or different and more typically different. The antidepressant may be dosed as prescribed by the attending physician and/or by its label and the esketamine is dosed as described herein. Typically, a patient is under concurrent treatment with both an antidepressant and esketamine, where both are administered by their prescribed dosing regimens.


Esketamine and the antidepressant(s) may be administered via the same or different routes of administration. Examples of suitable methods of administration include, but are not limited to, oral, intravenous (iv), intranasal (in) intramuscular (im), subcutaneous (sc), transdermal, buccal, or rectal. In some embodiments, esketamine is administered intranasally.


As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the term “antidepressant” shall mean any pharmaceutical agent which can be used to treat depression. Suitable examples include, without limitation, a mono-amine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), tricyclic, serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic agent, or atypical antipsychotic. Other examples include, but are not limited to mono-amine oxidase inhibitors such as irreversible MAOI (phenelzine, tranylcypromine), reversible MAOI (moclobemide), and the like; tricyclics such as imipramine, amitriptyline, desipramine, nortriptyline, doxepin, protriptyline, trimipramine, clomipramine, amoxapine, and the like; tetracyclics such as maprotiline, and the like; non-cyclics such as nomifensine, and the like; triazolopyridines such as trazodone, and the like; serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, and the like; serotonin receptor antagonists such as nefazadone, tianeptine and the like; serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine, milnacipran, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, levomilnacipran and the like; noradrenergic and specific serotonergic agents such as mirtazapine, and the like; noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors such as reboxetine, edivoxetine and the like; anticholinergics e.g., scopolamine; lithium; triple reuptake inhibitors; atypical antipsychotics such as bupropion, and the like; natural products such as Kava-Kava, St. John's Wort, and the like; dietary supplements such as s-adenosylmethionine, and the like; and neuropeptides such as thyrotropin-releasing hormone and the like; compounds targeting neuropeptide receptors such as neurokinin receptor antagonists and the like; and hormones such as triiodothyronine, and the like. In some embodiments, the antidepressant is imipramine, amitriptyline, desipramine, nortriptyline, doxepin, protriptyline, trimipramine, maprotiline, amoxapine, trazodone, bupropion, clomipramine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, escitalopram, citalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazadone, venlafaxine, milnacipran, reboxetine, mirtazapine, phenelzine, tranylcypromine, moclobemide, Kava-Kava, St. John's Wart, s-adenosylmethionine, thyrotropin releasing hormone, a neurokinin receptor antagonist, or triiodothyronine. Preferably, the antidepressant is selected from the group consisting of fluoxetine, imipramine, bupropion, venlafaxine and sertraline. Preferably, esketamine is administered in combination with one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of mono-amine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic agents, atypical antipsychotics, and/or adjunctive therapy with antipsychotic medication (e.g., risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole and ziprasidone). More preferably, esketamine is administered in combination with one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of mono-amino oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. More preferably, esketamine is administered in combination with one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. In other embodiments, the antidepressant is phenelzine, tranylcypromine, moclobemide, imipramine, amitriptyline, desipramine, nortriptyline, doxepin, protriptyline, trimipramine, clomipramine, amoxapine, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, bupropion, thyrotropin-releasing hormone and triiodothyronine. In further embodiments, the antidepressant is lithium, riluzole, phenelzine, tranylcypromine, moclobemide, imipramine, amitriptyline, desipramine, nortriptyline, doxepin, protriptyline, trimipramine, clomipramine, amoxapine, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, milnacipran, levomilnacipran, mirtazapine and bupropion. More preferably, esketamine is administered in combination with one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of phenelzine, tranylcypromine, moclobemide, imipramine, amitriptyline, desipramine, nortriptyline, doxepin, protriptyline, trimipramine, clomipramine, amoxapine, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine. More preferably, esketamine is administered in combination with one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram and fluvoxamine.


Therapeutically effective amounts/dosage levels and dosage regimens for antidepressants (e.g., mono-amine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic agents, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, natural products, dietary supplements, neuropeptides, compounds targeting neuropeptide receptors, hormones and other pharmaceutical agents disclosed herein), may be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, therapeutic dosage amounts and regimens for pharmaceutical agents approved for sale are publicly available, e.g., as listed on packaging labels, in standard dosage guidelines, in standard dosage references such as the Physician's Desk Reference (Medical Economics Company or online at http:///www.pdrel.com) or other sources.


As used herein the term “antipsychotic” includes, but is not limited to:

    • (a) typical or traditional antipsychotics, such as phenothiazines (e.g., chlorpromazine, thioridazine, fluphenazine, perphenazine, trifluoperazine, levomepromazine), thioxanthenes (e.g., thiothixene, flupentixol), butyrophenones (e.g., haloperidol), dibenzoxazepines (e.g., loxapine), dihydroindolones (e.g., molindone), substituted benzamides (e.g., sulpiride, amisulpride), and the like; and
    • (b) atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers, such as paliperidone, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, zotepine, ziprasidone, iloperidone, perospirone, blonanserin, sertindole, ORG-5222 (Organon), and the like; and others such as sonepiprazole, aripiprazole, nemonapride, SR-31742 (Sanofi), CX-516 (Cortex), SC-111 (Scotia), NE-100 (Taisho), divalproate (mood stabilizer) and the like.


In an embodiment, the “atypical antipsychotic” is selected from the group consisting of aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone and paliperidone. In another embodiment, the atypical antipsychotic is selected from the group consisting of aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, brexpiprazole, lurasidone, and risperidone; preferably, the atypical antipsychotic is selected from the group consisting of aripiprazole, quetiapine and olanzapine.


As used herein, the term “treatment-refractory or treatment-resistant depression” and the abbreviation “TRD” shall be defined as major depressive disorder in a patient that does not respond adequately to at least two different antidepressants, preferably between two and five antidepressants, in the current depressive episode. In other embodiments, TRD is defined as major depressive disorder in a patient that has not responded to at least two oral antidepressants of adequate dose and duration in the current depressive episode.


In other embodiments, the methods for treatment of depression may be combined with adjunctive therapies such as anti-psychotic therapy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or combinations thereof.


One skilled in the art will recognize that the failure to respond to an adequate course of a given antidepressant may be determined retrospectively or prospectively. In an embodiment, at least one of the failures to respond to an adequate course of antidepressant is determined prospectively. In another embodiment, at least two of the failures to respond to an adequate course of antidepressant are determined prospectively. In another embodiment, at least one of the failures to respond to an adequate course of antidepressant is determined retrospectively. In another embodiment, at least two of the failures to respond to an adequate course of antidepressant are determined retrospectively in a current depressive episode.


The “at least two oral antidepressants” or “at least two different oral depressants” has been administered to the patient at an adequate dose which may be determined by the attending physician. Similarly, the antidepressant has been administered for a suitable duration, as determined by the attending physician.


As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the terms “treating”, “treatment” and the like, shall include the management and care of a subject or patient (preferably mammal, more preferably human) for the purpose of combating a disease, condition, or disorder and includes the administration of a compound described herein to prevent the onset of the symptoms or complications, alleviate the symptoms or complications, or eliminate the disease, condition, or disorder.


The term “therapeutically effective amount” as used herein, means that amount of active compound or pharmaceutical agent that elicits the biological or medicinal response in a tissue system, animal or human that is being sought by a researcher, veterinarian, medical doctor or other clinician, which includes alleviation of the symptoms of the disease or disorder being treated. In some embodiments, the antidepressant is utilized in a therapeutically effective amount as determined by the attending physician. In other embodiments, esketamine is utilized in a therapeutically effective amount.


The therapeutically effective amount of esketamine and/or antidepressant may be administered during the initial phase(s) and/or subsequent phase(s) as described herein. In some embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 20 to about 100 mg. In other embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 30 to about 90 mg. In further embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 40 to about 80 mg. In yet other embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 14, about 15, about 16, about 17, about 18, about 19, about 20, about 21, about 22, about 23, about 24, about 25, about 26, about 27, about 28, about 29, about 30, about 31, about 32, about 33, about 34, about 35, about 36, about 37, about 38, about 39, about 40, about 41, about 42, about 43, about 44, about 45, about 46, about 47, about 48, about 49, about 50, about 51, about 52, about 53, about 54, about 55, about 56, about 57, about 58, about 59, about 60, about 61, about 62, about 63, about 64, about 65, about 66, about 67, about 68, about 69, about 70, about 71, about 72, about 73, about 74, about 75, about 76, about 77, about 78, about 79, about 80, about 81, about 82, about 83, about 84, about 85, about 86, about 87, about 88, about 89, about 90, about 91, about 92, about 93, about 94, about 95, about 96, about 97, about 98, about 99, or about 100 mg. In further embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount is about 28 mg, about 56 mg, or about 84 mg. In other embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount is about 56 mg or about 84 mg. In yet further embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 28 mg. In other embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 56 mg. In still further embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount of esketamine is about 84 mg. Unless otherwise noted, amounts of esketamine correspond to the free base of esketamine.


As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the terms “subject” and “patient” refer to an animal, preferably a mammal, most preferably a human, who has been the object of treatment, observation or experiment. Preferably, the subject or patient has experienced and/or exhibited at least one symptom of the disease or disorder to be treated and/or prevented.


In some embodiments, the subject or patient is an adult. As used herein, the term “adult” as used herein refers to a human that is about 18 years of age to about 65 years of age.


In other embodiments, the subject or patient is geriatric or elderly. As used herein, the terms “geriatric” and “elderly” are used interchangeably to refer to a human subject of about 65 years of age or older. Elderly patients between the ages of ≥65 to ≤75 appear to be more responsive to treatment than a patient of ≥75.


In further embodiments, the subject or patient is a pediatric subject. As used herein, the term “pediatric” refers to a human subject of younger than about 18 years of age.


As used herein, the term “composition” is intended to encompass a product comprising the specified ingredients in the specified amounts, as well as any product which results, directly or indirectly, from combinations of the specified ingredients in the specified amounts.


As used herein, “stable remission” refers to a patient having a MADRS total score of 12 or less for at least 3 of the last 4 weeks following the patient having achieved a substantially complete response to the esketamine during an induction phase. In certain exemplified embodiments herein, patients in “stable remission” include those having one excursion of a MADRS total score greater than 12 or one missing a MADRS assessment at week 13 or 14 following an induction phase. In other embodiments, patients in “stable remission” include those having a MADRS total score at weeks 15 and 16 of 12 or less following an induction phase.


As used herein, “stable response” refers to a patient having a 50% or greater reduction in the MADRS total score from baseline (Day 1 of induction phase; pre-randomization/prior to the first intranasal dose) in each of the last 2 weeks following the patient having achieved a substantially complete response to the esketamine during the induction phase, but does not meet criteria for stable remission.


As noted above, methods of treating depression in a patient are described. The methods include administering esketamine in one, two or optionally three phases, i.e., initial and subsequent administration phases. In some embodiments, the phases include an initial induction phase, an extended induction phase, a maintenance phase, or any combination thereof. Accordingly, an effective amount of esketamine is administered in each phase. A physician can assess the patient's condition to determine the most beneficial initiation/induction and maintenance doses for the patient from the dosage range and administration frequencies from those specified herein. The effective amount of esketamine may be the same in each phase or may differ.


The methods described herein permit optimizing dosages of esketamine for administration to a patient having or being predisposed to depression in an “optimization phase”. Optimization may be considered part of the maintenance phase that follows the induction phase. In some embodiments, the methods described herein do not require adjustment of the esketamine dosage. In fact, esketamine may be administered during the phases discussed herein (e.g., induction and maintenance) at the lowest dosing frequency at which an esketamine response is observed and maintained in a patient. An effective amount of esketamine has been found to be from about 28 to about 84 mg.


As used herein, an “induction phase” or “acute dosing phase” is a period of time that esketamine is initially administered to the patient. In some embodiments, the induction phase is sufficiently long as to achieve a robust, stable reduction of depressive symptoms. The induction phase may depend on factors including, without limitation, the particular patient and/or the patient's sex, age, weight, time of administration, administration frequency and concomitant diseases. The induction phase may include an initial induction phase and an extended induction phase. The totality of the induction phase (the initial and extended phases together) may be a period of about 4 to about 12 weeks, about 4 to about 11 weeks, about 4 to about 10 weeks, about 4 to about 9 weeks, about 4 to about 8 weeks, about 4 to about 7 weeks, about 4 to about 6 weeks, about 5 to about 12 weeks, about 5 to about 11 weeks, about 5 to about 10 weeks, about 5 to about 9 weeks, about 5 to about 8 weeks, about 5 to about 7 weeks, about 5 to about 6 weeks, about 6 to about 12 weeks, about 6 to about 11 weeks, about 6 to about 10 weeks, about 6 to about 9 weeks, about 6 to about 8 weeks, about 7 to about 12 weeks, about 7 to about 11 weeks, about 7 to about 10 weeks, about 7 to about 9 weeks, about 8 to about 12 weeks, about 8 to about 11 weeks, or about 8 to about 10 weeks. In some embodiments, the entire induction period is about 4 to about 8 weeks.


In the initial induction period, a patient is administered a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine at a given frequency of at least twice a week. In some embodiments, a patient is administered a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine at a given frequency of 3 times a week. To the extent that the dosing is 3 times a week, the dosing is on days 1, 3, and 5 of the week ±1 day. The initial induction phase is typically a period of time in which the patient is shown to be responsive to the treatment, but is not ready to progress to the maintenance phase. At timepoints therein, the patient's response is assessed by one skilled in the art. In some embodiments, the patient's response is assessed daily. In other embodiments, the patient's response is assessed twice weekly. In further embodiments, the patient's response is assessed every other day. In yet other embodiments, the patient's response is assessed at the end of the initial induction phase. Typically, the patient's response may be assessed using techniques and tests known to those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, the patient's MADRS score is determined and used as the determination as to whether the initial induction phase has concluded. The initial induction phase is desirably long as to achieve a reduction of depressive symptoms. In some embodiments, the initial induction phase is a period of about 1 to about 4 weeks. In other embodiments, the induction phase is a period of up to about 1 week, up to about 2 weeks, up to about 3 weeks, or up to about 4 weeks. In further embodiments, the initial induction period is about 1 to about 3 weeks, about 1 to about 2 weeks, about 2 to about 4 weeks, about 2 to about 3 weeks, about 3 to about 4 weeks, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, up to 1 week, up to 2 weeks, up to 3 weeks, or up to 4 weeks. The effective amount of esketamine administered during the initial induction phase may be determined by the attending physician. In some embodiments, the effective amount of esketamine administered during the initial induction phase is about 28 mg. In some embodiments, the effective amount of esketamine administered during the initial induction phase is about 56 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of esketamine administered during the initial induction phase is about 84 mg.


The term “twice weekly” as used herein refers to a frequency that is two times in a weekly (7-day) period. For example, “twice weekly” may refer herein to the administration of esketamine. “Twice weekly” may also refer to a frequency of monitoring a patient in one or more phases discussed herein. In some embodiments, twice weekly refers to a frequency that is day 1 and day 2 of a week. In other embodiments, twice weekly refers to a frequency that is day 1 and day 3 of a week. In further embodiments, twice weekly refers to a frequency that is day 1 and day 4 of a week. In still other embodiments, twice weekly refers to a frequency that is day 1 and day 5 of the week. The “day 1” may be any day of the week, including, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or Saturday. Typically, with respect to administration of esketamine, twice weekly refers to a frequency that is day 1 and day 4 of a week. To the extent there is a mis-dose, the dose may be taken as soon as possible thereafter and the prescribed regimen thereafter continued.


In some patient populations (such as the elderly) the reduction of depressive symptoms during the initial induction phase is insufficient, and an extended induction phase is necessary. In an extended initial induction phase, continued administration of a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine at a given frequency of at least twice a week is performed. At timepoints therein, the patient's response is again assessed by one skilled in the art. In some embodiments, the patient's response is assessed daily. In other embodiments, the patient's response is assessed twice weekly. In further embodiments, the patient's response is assessed every other day. Typically, the patient's response may be assessed using techniques and tests known to those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, the patient's MADRS score is determined and used as the determination as to whether the extended induction period has concluded. The extended induction phase is desirably long as to achieve a substantial reduction of depressive symptoms, thus achieving a substantially complete response to esketamine.


The term “substantially complete response to esketamine” as used herein refers to a patient having a reduction of the MADRS score from baseline to at least a 50% improvement from baseline. In some embodiments, a substantially complete response to esketamine refers to a patient having either a MADRS score of at least 50% improvement from baseline or about −20 lower than the patients baseline score. In other embodiments, a substantially complete response includes a MADRS score of a reduction of about −20 or less, −19, or less, −18 or less, −17 or less, −16 or less, −15 or less, −14 or less, −13 or less, −12 or less, −11 or less, or −10 or less. In further embodiments, a substantially complete response results in a patient having a reduction from MADRS baseline score of about −15 to about −20. A substantially complete response to esketamine may also be obtained if the patient's MADRS scores is reduced by about 50% from the MADRS score at the start of the treatment. Such a substantially complete response may be observed at any point during esketamine treatment. In some embodiments, the substantially complete response is observed when the patient has a reduction of the MADRS total score from the baseline 4 hours following treatment. In other embodiments, the substantially complete response is observed where the patient has a reduction of the MADRS total score from the baseline 2 days following treatment.


The extended induction phase is a period of time that results in the substantially complete response to esketamine. In some embodiments, extended induction phase is about 1 to about 8 weeks. In other embodiments, the extended induction phase is a period of up to about 1 week, up to about 2 weeks, up to about 3 weeks, up to about 4 weeks, up to about 5 weeks, up to about 6 weeks, up to about 7 weeks, or up to about 8 weeks. In further embodiments, the extended induction period is about 1 to about 8 weeks, about 1 to about 7 weeks, about 1 to about 6 weeks, about 1 to about 5 weeks, about 1 to about 4 weeks, about 1 to about 3 weeks, about 2 to about 8 weeks, about 2 to about 7 weeks, about 2 to about 7 weeks, about 2 to about 6 weeks, about 2 to about 5 weeks, about 2 to about 4 weeks, about 3 to about 8 weeks, about 3 to about 7 weeks, about 3 to about 6 weeks, about 3 to about 5 weeks, about 4 to about 8 weeks, about 4 to about 7 weeks, about 4 to about 6 weeks, about 5 to about 8 weeks, about 5 to about 7 weeks, about 1 week, about 2 weeks, about 3 weeks, about 4 weeks, about 5 weeks, about 6 weeks, about 7 weeks, or about 8 weeks. The effective amount of esketamine administered during the extended induction phase may be determined by the attending physician. In some embodiments, the effective amount of esketamine administered during the extended induction phase is about 56 mg. In other embodiments, the effective amount of esketamine administered during the extended induction phase is about 84 mg.


The administration may further comprise an optimization/maintenance phase that follows the induction phase and wherein after the patient achieves a substantially complete response to the esketamine during the induction phase, the esketamine is administered at a frequency of less than twice a week during the optimization/maintenance phase. In some embodiments, the frequency of administration during the optimization/maintenance phase is once every week, once every two weeks, once a month, or a combination thereof.


At any stage during one or more of an induction phase, optimization phase, or maintenance phase, the patient's response to the treatment may be assessed using techniques described herein. This assessment may be performed until the patient is considered by one skilled in the art to have achieved a suitable response to the treatment regimen. In some embodiments, the induction period may be said to have completed when a patient's MADRS score is reduced by ≥50% from baseline or from about 20 to about 13. In other embodiments, the patient's MADRS score may be about 19, about 18, about 17, about 16, about 15, about 14, or about 13. Patients with MADRS scores ≤12 are considered in remission and if stable for four weeks should be moved to or maintained in the maintenance phase.


At the end of the induction phase or extended induction phase, the treating physician should evaluate the patient to optimize the dosing amount and frequency for any subsequent administration phases such as the “maintenance phase” or “long-term therapy phase”. It is anticipated that the intranasal treatment frequency during the subsequent administration such as the maintenance phase will be reduced from that in the induction phase or extended induction phase (at least twice weekly) to once weekly dosing for at least 4 weeks. In some embodiments, the subsequent administration such as the maintenance phase is at least about 4 weeks, about 5 weeks, about 6 weeks, about 7 weeks, about 8 weeks, about 9 week, about 10 weeks, about 11 weeks, about 12 weeks, about 13 weeks, about 17 weeks, about 18 weeks, about 19 weeks, about 20 weeks, about 6 months, about 7 months, about 8 months, about 9 months, about 10 months, about 11 months, 1 year, or about 2 years. In some embodiments, the continuing administration of the esketamine during the subsequent administration phase is for at least six months. In other embodiments, the continuing administration of the esketamine during the subsequent administration phase is at least one year. In further embodiments, the frequency of administration during the subsequent administration phase is once every week or once every two weeks, or a combination thereof. In yet other embodiments, the dosing frequency and effective amount of esketamine during the subsequent administration phase is the minimum frequency and amount to maintain the stable remission or stable response.


The subsequent administration, such as in a maintenance period, may include longer periods of time depending on the patient's condition. In some embodiments, those longer periods may be at least about 3 years, about 4 years, about 5 years, about 6 years, about 7 years, about 8 years, about 9 years, about 10 years, or more than about 10 years, including indefinitely. For example, for patients diagnosed with TRD, treatment may be indefinite. In other embodiments, the treatment frequency is reduced to biweekly. In further embodiments, the treatment frequency is reduced to every three weeks. In yet other embodiments, the treatment frequency is reduced to monthly. The patients will be maintained on schedule until the patient achieves remission, maintains a response, or fails treatment. If the patient achieves remission or maintains a response with the once a week treatment for at least 4 weeks, the frequency of intranasal treatment sessions may be decreased to a maintenance dose of once every other week based on the severity of depressive symptoms and for some patient populations the frequency of treatment may be reduced to about once every three or four weeks as discussed above.


One skilled in the art will recognize that the maintenance phase described herein may continue until further treatment is not required and as indicated by, e.g., prolonged remission of the depression (including e.g., the remission of one or more symptoms associated with depression), social and/or occupational functional improvement to normal or premorbid levels, or other known measures of depression.


An effective amount of esketamine is administered to the patient during the maintenance phase. As noted above, the amount of esketamine administered during the maintenance phase is an amount that elicits the biological or medicinal response in a tissue system discussed above for the induction phase. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of esketamine is the amount which maintains a pharmacodynamic steady state of esketamine attained in the induction phase. In other embodiments, if depressed symptoms begin to worsen with treatment every other week, every three weeks or every four weeks, the dosing of esketamine will be increased to stabilize the patient. For example if the patient is being dosed every other week and their symptoms begin to worsen, esketamine can be administered once per week to maintain response during the maintenance phase. Again, at any time during the maintenance phase the patient's response maybe reassessed.


For elderly patients, the recommended dose of esketamine is about 28 to about 84 mg. The initial dose (at the first treatment session) is recommended to be about 28 mg of esketamine. Based on efficacy and tolerability of the about 28 mg dose, the dose at the next treatment session may remain at about 28 mg or be increased to about 56 mg. Depending on efficacy and tolerability of the about 56 mg dose, the dose at subsequent treatment session may remain at about 56 mg or be increased to about 84 mg, or reduced to about 28 mg. Depending on tolerability of the about 84 mg dose, the dose at subsequent treatment sessions may remain at about 84 mg or be reduced to about 56 mg.


For hepatically impaired patients, the recommended dose of esketamine is about 28 to about 56 mg. The initial dose (at the first treatment session) is recommended to be about 28 mg of esketamine. Based on efficacy and tolerability of the about 28 mg dose, the dose at the next treatment session may remain at about 28 mg or be increased to about 56 mg. Physicians should regularly monitor the hepatically impaired patients for drug tolerability, because esketamine is extensively metabolized in the liver.


For the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation and at imminent risk for suicide, dosing is more aggressive because of the severity of the condition. The methods include administering esketamine in one or two phases, i.e., an initial induction phase, and optionally in certain circumstances a maintenance phase. Due to the imminent risk to the patient's life the initial dose of esketamine is dosed at the highest effective amount of esketamine that the patient may tolerate twice a week in the induction phase. In some embodiments, the patient continues on therapy with the existing (i.e., currently initiated) antidepressant agent simultaneously with the beginning of therapy on esketamine during the induction phase. In other embodiments, the patient is initiated on a new antidepressant agent simultaneously with the beginning of therapy on esketamine during the induction phase. In further embodiments, the patient continues on therapy with a previously administered antidepressant agent simultaneously with the beginning of therapy on esketamine during the induction phase. The antidepressant should be dosed as labeled for the treatment of MDD, in a manner appropriate for the patient's condition/health. The induction phase should be about 4 to about 8 weeks, about 4 to about 7 weeks, about 4 to about 6 weeks, most preferably about 4 weeks. At the end of the induction phase the esketamine dosing should cease if the patient adequately responds to treatment or is in remission. The patient should be monitored to ensure that the patient remains stable/or in remission on the antidepressant alone. Should the patient fail to stabilize on the first combination of esketamine and antidepressant or fail treatment on the antidepressant that was initiated with esketamine after the dosing with esketamine ceases, a second induction phase may be begun.


In the second induction phase, the patient would be reinitiated on esketamine at the highest tolerable dose and simultaneously with a second new antidepressant. Alternatively, the patient would be reinitiated on esketamine at the highest tolerable dose and simultaneously with the same antidepressant that was used during the previous induction phase. The esketamine being dosed twice a week. The antidepressant would be dosed as labeled for the treatment of MDD, in a manner appropriate for the patient's condition/health. The second induction phase should be about 4 to about 8 weeks, about 4 to about 7 weeks, about 4 to about 6 weeks, most preferably about 4 weeks. At the end of the second induction phase, if the patient adequately responds to treatment or is in remission the esketamine dosing should cease and the patient should be monitored to ensure that the patient remains stable/or is in stable remission on the antidepressant alone. Should the patient fail to stabilize or fail treatment on the antidepressant that was initiated with esketamine after the dosing with esketamine ceases, a third induction phase may be begun.


In the third induction phase the patient would be reinitiated on esketamine at the highest tolerable dose and simultaneously with a third new antidepressant. Alternatively, the patient would be reinitiated on esketamine at the highest tolerable dose and simultaneously with the same antidepressant that was used during the second induction phase. The esketamine being dosed twice a week. The antidepressant would be dosed as labeled for the treatment of MDD in a manner appropriate for the patient's condition/health. The third induction phase should be about 4 to about 8 weeks, about 4 to about 7 weeks, about 4 to about 6 weeks, most preferably about 4 weeks. At the end of the third induction phase the patient would proceed to the maintenance phase specified for TRD, since the patient now qualifies as a TRD patient. The methods described herein permit optimizing dosages of esketamine for administration to a patient having or being predisposed to depression. In some embodiments, the methods described herein do not require adjustment of the esketamine dosage.


In general, the patient may be reinitiated on esketamine at the highest tolerable dose and simultaneously with the same antidepressant that was used during any previous induction phase, including with an antidepressant in which the patient failed to stabilize or otherwise failed treatment. For example, in a method for treating treatment-resistant depression in a patient wherein the patient has not responded to at least two oral antidepressants in the current depressive episode, the patient may be administered esketamine at least twice weekly solely with esketamine or along with a first oral antidepressant that is the same or different than the previously ineffective oral antidepressant in a first induction phase. To the extent the patient fails to achieve a substantially complete response to the esketamine, the patient can be reinitiated at the highest tolerable dose of esketamine alone or simultaneously with a second oral depressant that is the same or different than the first oral antidepressant in a second induction phase. To the extent the patient achieves a substantially complete response to the esketamine during the second induction phase, the patient can then be administered a therapeutically effective amount of esketamine less than twice weekly during a subsequent maintenance phase.


In the event that one or more (e.g., two) doses of esketamine in any of the phases described herein are missed, the next dose is scheduled when possible based on the dosing frequency regimen. If more than 2 doses are missed, per clinical judgement, adjustment of the dose or frequency of esketamine may be required.


The preferred pharmaceutical composition, S-ketamine hydrochloride as the active ingredient is intimately admixed with a pharmaceutical carrier, preferably water, according to conventional pharmaceutical compounding techniques, which carrier may take a wide variety of forms depending of the form of preparation desired for administration. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers are well known in the art. Descriptions of some of these pharmaceutically acceptable carriers may be found in The Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, published by the American Pharmaceutical Association and the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.


Methods of formulating pharmaceutical compositions have been described in numerous publications such as Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Volumes 1-3, edited by Lieberman et al; Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications, Volumes 1-2, edited by Avis et al; and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Disperse Systems, Volumes 1-2, edited by Lieberman et al; published by Marcel Dekker, Inc.


One suitable aqueous formulation of S-ketamine, comprises water and S-ketamine; wherein the S-ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about 25 mg/mL to about 250 mg/mL, preferably about 55 mg/mL to about 250 mg/mL or about 100 mg/mL to about 250 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein, based on the total volume of the pharmaceutical composition. Preferably, the S-ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about 150 mg/ml to about 200 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein. More preferably, the S-ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about 150 mg/mL to about 175 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein. More preferably, the S-Ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about 160 mg/mL to about 163 mg/mL, e.g., in an amount of about 161.4 mg/mL.


Another suitable aqueous formulation of S-ketamine comprises water and S-ketamine; wherein the S-ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about eq. 100 mg/mL to about eq. 250 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein, based on the total volume of the pharmaceutical composition. Preferably, the S-ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about eq. 125 mg/ml to about eq. 180 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein. More preferably, the S-ketamine is present in an amount in the range of from about eq. 140 mg/mL to about eq. 160 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein, e.g., in an amount of about eq. 140 mg/mL.


Suitable pharmaceutical compositions for use herein are preferably an aqueous formulation. As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the term “aqueous” shall mean that the primary liquid component of the formulation is water. Preferably, water constitutes greater than about 80 wt-% of the liquid component of the pharmaceutical composition, more preferably greater than about 90 wt-%, more preferably greater than about 95 wt-%, more preferably about 98 wt-%.


In suitable pharmaceutical compositions for use herein, the water content of the composition is within the range of 85±14 wt.-%, more preferably 85±12 wt.-%, still more preferably 85±10 wt.-%, most preferably 85±7.5 wt.-% and in particular 85±5 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the composition.


In suitable pharmaceutical compositions for use herein, preferably the water content of the composition is within the range of 90±14 wt.-%, more preferably 90±12 wt.-%, still more preferably 90±10 wt.-%, most preferably 80±7.5 wt.-% and in particular 90±5 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the composition.


In another pharmaceutical composition for use herein, the water content of the composition is within the range of 95±4.75 wt.-%, more preferably 95±4.5 wt.-%, still more preferably 95±4 wt.-%, yet more preferably 95±3.5 wt.-%, most preferably 95±3 wt.-% and in particular 95±2.5 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the composition.


In another pharmaceutical composition for use herein, the water content of the composition is within the range of from 75 to 99.99 wt.-%, more preferably 80 to 99.98 wt.-%, still more preferably 85 to 99.95 wt.-%, yet more preferably 90 to 99.9 wt.-%, most preferably 95 to 99.7 wt.-% and in particular 96.5 to 99.5 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the composition.


In another pharmaceutical composition for use herein, the composition further comprises one or more buffers and/or buffer systems (i.e., conjugate acid-base-pairs).


As used herein, the term “buffer” shall mean any solid or liquid composition (preferably an aqueous, liquid composition) which when added to an aqueous formulation adjusts the pH of said formulation. One skilled in the art will recognize that a buffer may adjust the pH of the aqueous formulation in any direction (toward more acidic, more basic or more neutral pH). Preferably, the buffer is pharmaceutically acceptable.


Suitably examples of buffers which may be used in the aqueous formulations include, but are not limited to citric acid, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, acetic acid, boric acid, sodium borate, succinic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, lactic acid, furmaric acid, and the like. Preferably, the buffer or buffer system is selected from the group consisting of NaOH, citric acid, sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate.


In an embodiment, the buffer is selected to adjust the pH of the S-ketamine hydrochloride pharmaceutical compositions (e.g., the aqueous formulations described herein) into a pH in the range of from about pH 3.5 to about pH 6.5, or any amount or range therein. Preferably, the buffer is selected to adjust the pH of the S-ketamine hydrochloride compositions to about in the range of from about pH 4.0 to about pH 5.5, or any amount or range therein, more preferably, in the range of from about pH 4.5 to about pH 5.0, or any amount or range therein.


Preferably, the concentration of the buffer and buffer system, respectively, preferably NaOH, is adjusted to provide a sufficient buffer capacity.


In an embodiment, the disclosure is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising S-ketamine hydrochloride, water, and a buffer or buffer system, preferably NaOH; wherein the buffer or buffer system is present in an amount sufficient to yield a formulation with a pH in the range of from about pH 4.0 to about pH 6.0, or any amount or range therein.


Optionally the pharmaceutical compositions may contain a preservative. As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the terms “antimicrobial preservative” and “preservative” preferably refer to any substance that is usually added to pharmaceutical compositions in order to preserve them against microbial degradation or microbial growth. In this regard, microbial growth typically plays an essential role, i.e., the preservative serves the main purpose of avoiding microbial contamination. As a side aspect, it may also be desirable to avoid any effect of the microbes on the active ingredients and excipients, respectively, i.e., to avoid microbial degradation.


Representative examples of preservatives include, but are not limited to, benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, benzoic acid, sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol, bronopol, cetrimide, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, chlorbutanol, chlorocresol, chloroxylenol, cresol, ethyl alcohol, glycerin, hexetidine, imidurea, phenol, phenoxyethanol, phenylethyl alcohol, phenylmercuric nitrate, propylene glycol, sodium propionate, thimerosal, methyl paraben, ethyl paraben, propyl paraben, butyl paraben, isobutyl paraben, benzyl paraben, sorbic acid, and potassium sorbate.


The complete absence of preservatives in the pharmaceutical compositions used herein is preferred when the content of S-ketamine hydrochloride is sufficiently high so that due to its preservative property the desired shelf life or in use stability can be achieved by the presence of the drug itself. Preferably, under these circumstances the concentration of S-ketamine hydrochloride is at least eq. 120 mg/mL, preferably in the range of from about eq. 120 mg/mL to about eq. 175 mg/ml, or any amount or range therein, more preferably in an amount in the range of from about eq. 125 mg/mL to about eq. 150 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein, e.g., at about eq. 126 mg/mL or at about eq. 140 mg/mL.


As used herein, the terms “penetration agent”, “penetration enhancer”, and “penetrant” refer to any substance that increases or facilitates absorption and/or bioavailability of the active ingredient (e.g., S-ketamine hydrochloride) of a pharmaceutical composition. Preferably, the penetration agents increases or facilitates absorption and/or bioavailability of the active ingredient (e.g., S-ketamine hydrochloride) of a pharmaceutical composition, following nasal administration (i.e., increases or facilitates absorption and/or bioavailability of the active ingredient through the mucosal membrane).


Suitable examples include, but are not limited to tetradecyl maltoside, sodium glycocholate, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), lecithines, and the like; and chitosan (and salts), and surface active ingredients such as benzalkonium chloride, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium docusate, polysorbates, laureth-9, oxtoxynol, sodium deoxycholate, polyarginine, and the like. Preferably, the penetration agent is tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA).


The penetration agent may work via any mechanism, including e.g., by increasing the membrane fluidity, creating transient hydrophilic pores in the epithelial cells, decreasing the viscosity of the mucus layer or opening up tight junctions. Some penetration agents (e.g., bile salts and fusidic acid derivatives) may also inhibit the enzymatic activity in the membrane, thereby improving bioavailability of the active ingredient.


Preferably, the penetration agent is selected to meet one or more, more preferably all, of the following general requirements:

    • (a) It is effective at increasing absorption (preferably nasal absorption) of the active ingredient, preferably in a temporary and/or reversible manner;
    • (b) It is pharmacologically inert;
    • (c) It is non-allergic, non-toxic and/or non-irritating;
    • (d) It is highly potent (effective in small amounts);
    • (e) It is compatible with the other components of the pharmaceutical composition;
    • (f) It is odorless, colorless and/or tasteless;
    • (g) It is accepted by regulatory agencies; and
    • (h) It is inexpensive and available in high purity.


In one embodiment, the penetration agent is selected to increase penetration (absorption and/or bioavailability of the S-ketamine hydrochloride) without nasal irritation. In another embodiment, the penetration agent is selected to improve absorption and/or bioavailability of the S-ketamine hydrochloride; and further selected to enhance uniform dosing efficacy.


In an embodiment, the disclosure is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising S-ketamine and water; herein the pharmaceutical composition does not contain an antimicrobial preservative; and wherein the pharmaceutical compositions further contains a penetration enhancer, preferably TUDCA.


In another embodiment, the disclosure is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising S-ketamine and water; herein the pharmaceutical composition does not contain an antimicrobial preservative; and wherein the pharmaceutical compositions further contains tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA); wherein the TUDCA is present in a concentration in the range of from about 1.0 mg/mL to about 25.0 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein, preferably in a concentration in the range of from about 2.5 mg/mL to about 15 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein, preferably in a concentration in the range of from about 5 mg/mL to about 10 mg/mL, or any amount or range therein. In another embodiment, the disclosure is directed to pharmaceutical composition wherein the TUDCA is present at a concentration of about 5 mg/mL. In another embodiment, the disclosure is directed to pharmaceutical composition wherein the TUDCA is present at a concentration of about 10 mg/mL.


The pharmaceutical compositions for use herein may further contain one or more additional excipients e.g., wetting agents, surfactant components, solubilizing agents, thickening agents, colorant agents, antioxidant components, and the like.


Examples of a suitable antioxidant component, if used, include, but are not limited to one or more of the following: sulfites; ascorbic acid; ascorbates, such as sodium ascorbate, calcium ascorbate, or potassium ascorbate; ascorbyl palmitate; fumaric acid; ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) or its sodium or calcium salts; tocopherol; gallates, such as propyl gallate, octyl gallate, or dodecyl gallate; vitamin E; and mixtures thereof. The antioxidant component provides long term stability to the liquid compositions. Addition of the antioxidant component can help enhance and ensure the stability of the compositions and renders the compositions stable even after six months at 40° C. A suitable amount of the antioxidant component, if present, is about 0.01 wt.-% to about 3 wt.-%, preferably about 0.05 wt.-% to about 2 wt.-%, of the total weight of the composition.


Solubilizing and emulsifying agents can be included to facilitate more uniform dispersion of the active ingredient or other excipient that is not generally soluble in the liquid carrier. Examples of a suitable emulsifying agent, if used, include, but are not limited to, e.g., gelatin, cholesterol, acacia, tragacanth, pectin, methyl cellulose, carbomer, and mixtures thereof. Examples of a suitable solubilizing agent include polyethylene glycol, glycerin, D-mannitol, trehalose, benzyl benzoate, ethanol, trisaminomethane, cholesterol, triethanolamine, sodium carbonate, sodium citrate, sodium salicylate, sodium acetate, and mixtures thereof.


Preferably, the solubilizing agent includes glycerin. The solubilizing or emulsifying agent is/are generally present in an amount sufficient to dissolve or disperse the active ingredient, i.e., S-ketamine, in the carrier. Typical amounts when a solubilizing or an emulsifier are included are from about 1 wt.-% to about 80 wt.-%, preferably about 20 wt.-% to about 65 wt.-%, and more preferably about 25 wt.-% to about 55 wt.-%, of the total weight of the composition.


A suitable isotonizing agent, if used, includes sodium chloride, glycerin, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, glucose, and mixtures thereof. A suitable amount of the isotonizing agent, when included, is typically about 0.01 wt.-% to about 15 wt.-%, more preferably about 0.3 wt.-% to about 4 wt.-%, and more preferably about 0.5 wt.-% to about 3 wt.-%, of the total weight of the composition.


A suspending agent or viscosity increasing agent can be added to the pharmaceutical compositions to, e.g., increase the residence time in the nose. Suitably examples include, but are not limited to, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, sodium carmellose, microcrystalline cellulose, carbomer, pectin, sodium alginate, chitosan salts, gellan gum, poloxamer, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, xanthan gum, and the like.


Advantageously, esketamine may be administered in a single daily dose, or the total daily dosage may be administered in divided doses of two, three or four times daily, preferably two times daily. Typically, divided doses should be made closer in time. In some embodiments, divided doses are administered about within 20 minutes, about 15 minutes, about 10 minutes, about 5 minutes, about 4 minutes, about 3 minutes, about 2 minutes, about 1 minute, or less of each other. Additionally, in a flexible dosing regimen a patient could be dosed daily, twice a week, once a week, once every other week or once monthly. For example, one dose of the esketamine is administered on day 1 and another dose of the esketamine is administered on day 2, or one dose of the esketamine is administered on day 1 and another dose of the esketamine is administered on day 3, or one dose of the esketamine is administered on day 1 and another dose of the esketamine is administered on day 4, or one dose of the esketamine is administered on day 1 and another dose of the esketamine is administered on day 5. Furthermore, esketamine is preferably administered in intranasal form via topical use of suitable intranasal vehicles, such as a nasal spray pump.


A representative nasal spray device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,321,942, incorporated by reference herein. For example, a disposable atomizer for discharging successive partial discharge amounts as a spray may be utilized to carry out the methods discloses herein. Typically, such devices allow a medicament to be sprayed into both nostrils of a patient in two successive strokes. The device may be ready-to-use wherein the medicament is discharged from a medium container. The device is typically able to separate a first discharge stroke from a second discharge stroke to prevent complete emptying of the medium container in a single motion. The device may take the form of a double-stroke disposable pump, which is disposed of after a single use and enables individual partial discharges with high dosing precision and reliability.


In one embodiment, the nasal spray device is a single-use device that delivers a total of 28 mg of esketamine in two sprays, one spray per nostril. The device may be operated by the patient under the supervision of a healthcare professional. With respect to dosage amounts, one device may be used for a 28 mg dose, two devices for a 56 mg dose, or three devices for an 84 mg dose. It is also preferable to have a 5-minute interval between the use of each device. As described in Example 1, time 0 is defined as the time of administration of the first intranasal spray to one nostril from the first intranasal device.


As used herein, AD=antidepressant; ESK=esketamine nasal spray; PHQ-9=Patient Adherence Questionnaire; SDS=Sheehan Disability Scale; CGI-S=Clinical Global Impression—Severity; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; SD=standard deviation; C-SSRS=Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; MDD=major depressive disorder; MGH-ATRQ=Massachusetts General Hospital—Antidepressant Treatment History Questionnaire; TRD=treatment resistant depression.


The following Examples are set forth to aid in the understanding of the invention, and are not intended and should not be construed to limit in any way the invention set forth in the claims which follow thereafter.


Example 1

This is an open-label, multicenter, long-term study to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant in subjects with TRD (ESKETINTRD3002/NCT02418585).


Study Drug Information

Esketamine was supplied as a clear, colorless intranasal solution of esketamine hydrochloride (16.14% weight/volume [w/v]; equivalent to 14% w/v of esketamine base) in a nasal spray pump. The solution consisted of 161.4 mg/mL esketamine hydrochloride (equivalent to 140 mg of esketamine base) formulated in 0.12 mg/mL ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 1.5 mg/mL citric acid at a pH of 4.5 in water for injection. It is provided in a nasal spray pump, which delivered 16.14 mg esketamine hydrochloride (14 mg esketamine base) per 100-μL spray. Each individual nasal spray pump (device) contained a total of 28 mg (i.e., 2 sprays).


The placebo solution was supplied as a clear, colorless intranasal solution of water for injection, with a bittering agent (denatonium benzoate [Bitrex®] at a final concentration of 0.001 mg/mL) added to simulate the taste of the intranasal solution with active drug. The placebo solution was provided in matching nasal spray pump devices. Benzalkonium chloride was added as a preservative at a concentration of 0.3 mg/mL. Each individual nasal spray pump (device) contained 2 sprays.


Intranasal Study Drug

Table 1 describes how each intranasal treatment session was administered.









TABLE 1







Intranasal Treatment Administration during


the Double-blind Induction Phase








Intranasal
Time of Intranasal Device Administration










Treatment
0a
5 minutes
10 minutes





Intranasal
1st
2nd
3rd


Deviceb


Placebo
1 spray of
1 spray of
1 spray of



placebo to each
placebo to each
placebo to each



nostril
nostril
nostril


Esketamine
1 spray of
1 spray of
1 spray of


56 mg
esketamine to
esketamine to
placebo to each



each nostril
each nostril
nostril


Esketamine
1 spray of
1 spray of
1 spray of


84 mg
esketamine to
esketamine to
esketamine to



each nostril
each nostril
each nostril






aTime 0 was defined as the time of administration of the first intranasal spray to one nostril from the first intranasal device.




bOne device was used at each time point. Each individual intranasal device contained 2 sprays. The intranasal devices containing esketamine delivered 14 mg per spray, for a total of 28 mg per individual device (i.e., 2 sprays).







On Day 1, subjects randomized to intranasal esketamine started with a dose of 56 mg. On Day 4, the dose was increased to 84 mg or remained at 56 mg. On Day 8, the dose was increased to 84 mg (if Day 4 dose was 56 mg), remained the same, or was reduced to 56 mg (if Day 4 dose was 84 mg). On Day 11, the dose was increased to 84 mg (if Day 8 dose was 56 mg), remained the same, or was reduced to 56 mg (if Day 8 dose was 84 mg). On Day 15, a dose reduction from 84 mg to 56 mg was permitted, if required for tolerability; no dose increase was permitted on Day 15. After Day 15, the dose remained stable (unchanged).


Oral Antidepressant Medications

Duloxetine 30 mg, Escitalopram 10 mg, Sertraline 50 mg and 25 mg, and Venlafaxine 75 mg and 37.5 mg were obtained from commercial stock.


Treatment Duration/Trial Duration

Each subject participated in up to 4 phases: up to 4-week screening phase (direct-entry subjects only), a 4-week open-label induction (IND) phase (direct-entry subjects and transferred-entry non responder subjects), a 48-week open-label optimization/maintenance (OP/MA) phase (all responder subjects from the open label IND phase of the current study, and transferred-entry responder subjects), and a 4-week follow-up phase. The maximum duration of the subject's participation in ESKETINTRD3004 study was 60 weeks for direct-entry subjects; 56 weeks for transferred-entry non-responder subjects, and 52 weeks for transferred-entry responder subjects. The sample size of 750 was estimated to have at least 300 subjects received treatment with intranasal esketamine for 6 months and at least 100 subjects for 12 months. In addition, transfer-entry subjects were enrolled from 3005 study to get 100 elderly subjects dosed with esketamine. See, FIG. 1 for the trial design.


Analysis Sets for Efficacy

The efficacy analyses are based on the full (IND) analysis set and the full (OP/MA) analysis set. The full (IND) analysis set is defined as all subjects who receive at least 1 dose of intranasal study medication or 1 dose of oral antidepressant in the open-label IND phase (for direct-entry and transferred-entry non-responder subjects). The full (OP/MA) analysis is defined as all subjects who receive at least 1 dose of intranasal study medication or 1 dose of oral antidepressant in the OP/MA phase. Efficacy variables include the MADRS which consists of 10 items that cover all the core depressive symptoms: each item is scored from 0 (symptom is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by summing the scores of all 10 items. A higher score represents a more severe condition.


Subject and Treatment Information

802 subjects with a DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) diagnosis of MDD were enrolled. Of the 802 enrolled subjects, 691 were direct-entry subjects and 111 were transfer-entry subjects from study ESKETINTRD3005. Out of 779 direct entry or transfer-entry non-responder subjects from the TRD3005 study in the full (IND) analysis set, 580 (74.5%) completed the IND phase. Of the 603 subjects entered in the OP/MA phase, 150 (24.9%) completed the OP/MA phase. A total of 357 subjected entered the follow-up phase and 326 (91.3%) completed the follow-up phase.


Of the 802 enrolled subjects, one subject did not receive intranasal study drug but did receive oral AD and 1 subject received intranasal study drug but did not receive oral AD. These subjects are included in the all enrolled analysis set. See, Tables 2 and 3.









TABLE 2







Number of Subjects Entered from Study ESKETINTRD3005


(By Responder Status) and Direct Entry Subjects (Study


ESKETINTRD3004: All Enrolled Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 802)














Direct-entry subjects in study












ESKETINTRD3004
691
(86.2%)



Transferred-entry subjects from study



ESKETINTRD3005:
111
(13.8%)



Non-responder subjects
88
(11.0%)



Intranasal esk 28 mg + oral AD
3
(0.4%)



Intranasal esk 56 mg + oral AD
9
(1.1%)



Intranasal esk 84 mg + oral AD
28
(3.5%)



Oral AD + Placebo
48
(6.0%)



Responder subjects
23
(2.9%)



Intranasal esk 28 mg + oral AD
1
(0.1%)



Intranasal esk 56 mg + oral AD
5
(0.6%)



Intranasal esk 84 mg + oral AD
9
(1.1%)



Oral AD + Placebo
8
(1.0%)







The final dose in the TRD3005 study is presented for the Transferred-entry subjects.













TABLE 3







Number of Subjects in Each Analysis Set (Study


ESKETINTRD3004: All Enrolled Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 802)














Induction phase




Full (IND)
779 (97.1%)



Optimization/maintenance phase



Full (OP/MA)
603 (75.2%)



Follow-up phase



Follow-up
3574.5%)










Subjects received flexible doses of intranasal ESK for the 1st 2 weeks, followed by fixed doses (28 mg—in elderly subjects only, 56 mg or 84 mg in all age groups) plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant (sertraline, escitalopram, venlafaxine XR or fluoxetine). Esketamine was dosed twice a week during the IND. In the OP/MA, weekly administration occurred from weeks 5 to 8. From weeks 9 to 52 of the OP/MA phase, esketamine was dosed either weekly or every other week depending on the MADRS score with the aim of having the lowest frequency to sustain remission. Switching to every other week treatment (if total MADRS score was ≤12) or back to weekly treatment (if total MADRS score was >12) was possible at 4-week intervals, starting at week 8. From day 15 (patients <65 years) or day 18 (patients ≥65 years) the dose of esketamine nasal spray remained the same. After an initial period of dose up-titration, the dose of oral antidepressants remained the same. Dose reductions based on tolerability were allowed for both medications. Baseline psychiatric history for the all enrolled analysis set is presented in Table 4.









TABLE 4







Baseline(IND) Psychiatric History (Study ESKETINTRD3004:


All Enrolled Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 802)












Age when diagnosed with MDD (years)



N
802









Mean (SD)
35.7
(13.75)








Median
35.0


Range
 (8; 72)


Baseline MADRS total score


N
802









Mean (SD)
31.4
(5.39)








Median
31.0


Range
(19; 49)


Baseline CGI-S


N
802









Mean (SD)
4.8
(0.77)








Median
5.0


Range
(1; 7)


Baseline CGI-S category, n (%)


N
802









Normal, not at all ill
1
(0.1%)


Borderline mentally ill
3
(0.4%)


Mildly ill
18
(2.2%)


Moderately ill
235
(29.3%)


Markedly ill
409
(51.0%)


Severely ill
130
(16.2%)


Among the most extremely ill patients
6
(0.7%)








Baseline PHQ-9 total score



N
802









Mean (SD)
17.3
(5.01)








Median
18.0


Range
 (0; 27)


Screening C-SSRS lifetime a, n (%)


N
800









No event
474
(59.3%)


Suicidal ideation
203
(25.4%)


Suicidal behavior
123
(15.4%)








Screening C-SSRS past 6 or



12 months a, n (%)


N
800









No event
583
(72.9%)


Suicidal ideation (past 6 months)
215
(26.9%)


Suicidal behavior (past 12 months)
2
(0.3%)








Duration of current episode (wks)



N
802









Mean (SD)
160.5
(261.80)








Median
66.5


Range
  (6; 2184)


No. of previous antidepressant


medications b c, n (%)


N
802









1
17
(2.1%)


2
465
(58.0%)


3
187
(23.3%)


4
84
(10.5%)


5
23
(2.9%)


6
17
(2.1%)


7
4
(0.5%)


8
5
(0.6%)


Family history of depression, n (%)








N
802









Yes
346
(43.1%)


No
456
(56.9%)


Family history of anxiety disorder, n (%)








N
802









Yes
61
(7.6%)


No
741
(92.4%)


Family history of bipolar disorder, n (%)








N
802









Yes
35
(4.4%)


No
767
(95.6%)


Family history of schizophrenia, n (%)








N
802









Yes
38
(4.7%)


No
764
(95.3%)


Family history of alcohol abuse, n (%)








N
802









Yes
61
(7.6%)


No
741
(92.4%)


Family history of substance abuse, n (%)








N
802









Yes
24
(3.0%)


No
778
(97.0%)








Number of prior ADs with nonresponse
1 = 2.1% d 3 = 23.3%



2 = 58.0% ≥4 = 16.6%





Baseline (IND) is the last observation prior to or on the start date of induction phase for direct-entry and transferred-entry non-responder subjects and is baseline (IND) from study 3005 for the transferred-entry responder subjects.



a C-SSRS category: No event = 0; Suicidal ideation = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; Suicidal behavior = 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.




b Number of antidepressant medications with non-response (defined as ≤25% improvement or 26%-<50% improvement for direct entry subjects and defined as ≤25% improvement for transfer entry subjects) taken for at least 6 weeks during the current episode as obtained from MGH-ATRQ at the time of the first screening visit.




c Direct entry subjects are to have to ≥2 oral antidepressant treatments in the current episode of depression and transfer entry subjects are to have ≥1 oral antidepressants in the current episode.




d Subjects from 3005 who had non-response to 1 AD and showed prospective non-response to 2nd AD during screening of the 3005 study.







Extent of Exposure

The number of doses of intranasal study medication during the IND phase is summarized in Table 5.









TABLE 5







Number of Days Dosed with Intranasal Study Medication; Induction


Phase (Study ESKETINTRD3004: Full (IND) Analysis Set)











Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



Number of days dosed
(N = 779)















1
29
(3.7%)



2
24
(3.1%)



3
12
(1.5%)



4
11
(1.4%)



5
6
(0.8%)



6
22
(2.8%)



7
52
(6.7%)



8
622
(79.8%)










A summary of mean, mode and final dose of intranasal study medication during the IND phase is summarized in Table 6. On Day 25 of the IND phase 28/675 (4.1%) were receiving the 28 mg dose of esketamine, 298/675 (44.1%) were receiving the 56 mg dose of esketamine and 349/675 (51.7%) were receiving the 84 mg dose of esketamine.









TABLE 6







Mean, Mode, and Final Daily Dose of Intranasal


Study Medication; Induction Phase (Study ESKETINTRD3004:


Full (IND) Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 779)














Mean daily dose (mg)




N
778











Mean (SD)
64.4
(13.15)










Median
63.0











Range

(28; 81)



Mode daily dose (mg)










N
741











Mean (SD)
68.5
(16.51)










Median
56.0



Range
(28; 84)











Final daily dose (mg)












N
778











Mean (SD)
68.2
(16.61)










Median
56.0



Range
(28; 84)







The calculation of mean, mode, and final daily dose excludes days off intranasal study medication. The final dose is the last non-zero dose received during the induction phase.






The extent of exposure to intranasal study medication during the combined IND and OP/MA phases is summarized in Table 7.









TABLE 7







Extent of Exposure to Intranasal Study Medication;


Induction and Optimization/Maintenance Phases (Study


ESKETINTRD3004: All Enrolled Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD













Cumulative




Total Duration
Distribution




(N = 802)
(N = 802)
















Duration, weeks














N
801
801












Category, n (%)






≤Week 4 (≤Day 28)
202
(25.2%)
202 (25.2%)



Weeks 4-8 (Days 29-56)
35
(4.4%)
237 (29.6%)



Weeks 8-12 (Days 57-84)
23
(2.9%)
260 (32.4%)



Weeks 12-16 (Days 85-112)
48
(6.0%)
308 (38.4%)



Weeks 16-20 (Days 113-140)
52
(6.5%)
360 (44.9%)



Weeks 20-24 (Days 141-168)
50
(6.2%)
410 (51.1%)



Weeks 24-28 (Days 169-196)
52
(6.5%)
462 (57.6%)



Weeks 28-32 (Days 197-224)
34
(4.2%)
496 (61.8%)



Weeks 32-36 (Days 225-252)
30
(3.7%)
526 (65.6%)



Weeks 36-40 (Days 253-280)
32
(4.0%)
558 (69.6%)



Weeks 40-44 (Days 281-308)
45
(5.6%)
603 (75.2%)



Weeks 44-48 (Days 309-336)
35
(4.4%)
638 (79.6%)



Weeks 48-52 (Days 337-364)
155
(19.4%)
793 (98.9%)



>Week 52 (>Day 364)
8
(1.0%)
801 (99.9%)



Mean (SD)
24.9
(18.54)











Median
22.9




Range
(0; 56)







The duration of exposure is defined as the duration between the date of the first exposure and the date of the last exposure to intranasal study medication. It includes days on which subjects did not actually take intranasal study medication.






The frequency of subjects with 6 months and 12 months of exposure to esketamine is presented in Table 8.









TABLE 8







Frequency Distribution of Subjects with 6 Months and


12 Months of Exposure to Intranasal Study Medication


(Study ESKETINTRD3004: All Enrolled Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 802)














Subjects with 6 months of exposure
364 (45.4%)



Subjects with 12 months of exposure
136 (17.0%)







6 months is defined as ≥180 days and 12 months is defined as ≥350 days.






A summary of mean, mode and final dose of intranasal study medication during the OP/MA phase is summarized in Table 9.









TABLE 9







Mean, Mode, and Final Daily Dose of Intranasal Study


Medication; Optimization/Maintenance Phase (Study


ESKETINTRD3004: Full (OP/MA) Analysis Set)









Intranasal



Esk + Oral AD



(N = 603)














Mean daily dose (mg)




N
603



Mean (SD)
68.8 (15.74)



Median
68.3



Range
(25; 84)



Mode daily dose (mg)



N
596



Mean (SD)
69.1 (15.75)



Median
70.0



Range
(28; 84)



Final daily dose (mg)



N
603



Mean (SD)
69.0 (16.05)



Median
84.0



Range
(28; 84)







The calculation of mean, mode, and final daily dose excludes days off intranasal study medication. The final dose is the last non-zero dose received during the optimization/maintenance phase.






On Week 48 of the OP/MA phase, 7/143 (4.90%), 69/143 (48.3%), 1/143 (0.7%) and 66/143 (46.2%) were receiving the 28 mg dose, 56 mg dose, 70 mg dose, and 84 mg dose of esketamine, respectively. Starting from Week 4 (OP/MA), the intranasal treatment session frequency could be adjusted (if applicable) at fixed, 4-week intervals. Of the 603 subjects treated with intranasal esketamine during the OP/MA phase, 275 (47.6%) subjects switched from weekly dosing to every other week at Week 4 (OP/MA). See, Table 10.









TABLE 10







Frequency of Subjects who Changed the Dosing Frequency


(Weekly to Every Other Week or Every Other Week to


Weekly) Over Time Starting From Week 4 (OP/MA) of


this Phase; Optimization/Maintenance Phase (Study


ESKETINTRD3004: Full (OP/MA) Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 603)














Week 4(OP/MA)




N
578











Weekly to Every Other Week
275
(47.6%)










Every Other Week to Weekly
0











Did not switch
303
(52.4%)



Week 8(OP/MA)










N
548











Weekly to Every Other Week
80
(14.6%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
65
(11.9%)



Did not switch
403
(73.5%)



Week 12(OP/MA)










N
502











Weekly to Every Other Week
76
(15.1%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
52
(10.4%)



Did not switch
374
(74.5%)



Week 16(OP/MA)










N
463











Weekly to Every Other Week
58
(12.5%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
43
(9.3%)



Did not switch
362
(78.2%)



Week 20(OP/MA)










N
405











Weekly to Every Other Week
34
(8.4%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
29
(7.2%)



Did not switch
342
(84.4%)



Week 24(OP/MA)










N
357











Weekly to Every Other Week
23
(6.4%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
42
(11.8%)



Did not switch
292
(81.8%)



Week 28(OP/MA)










N
309











Weekly to Every Other Week
28
(9.1%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
22
(7.1%)



Did not switch
259
(83.8%)



Week 32(OP/MA)










N
287











Weekly to Every Other Week
30
(10.5%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
21
(7.3%)



Did not switch
236
(82.2%)



Week 36(OP/MA)










N
254











Weekly to Every Other Week
13
(5.1%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
17
(6.7%)



Did not switch
224
(88.2%)



Week 40(OP/MA)










N
211











Weekly to Every Other Week
13
(6.2%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
14
(6.6%)



Did not switch
184
(87.2%)



Week 44(OP/MA)










N
173











Weekly to Every Other Week
9
(5.2%)



Every Other Week to Weekly
6
(3.5%)



Did not switch
158
(91.3%)










Table 11 displays the dosing regimen changes during the OP/MA phase.









TABLE 11







Dosing Regimen Changes; Optimization/Maintenance Phase


(Study ESKETINTRD3004: Full (OP/MA) Analysis Set)









Intranasal Esk + Oral AD



(N = 603)












Total number of dosing regimen



changes per subject


N
603









0
145
(24.0%)


1
230
(38.1%)


2
85
(14.1%)


3
70
(11.6%)


4
35
(5.8%)


5
28
(4.6%)


6
10
(1.7%) a








Dosing Regimen



N
603









Weekly dose throughout entire OP/MA phase
145
(24.0%)


One change only from weekly to every
230
(38.1%)


other week


Change back and forth from weekly to
228
(37.8%)


every other week





The denominator is the number of subjects who have dosing ≥Week 4(OP/MA)


Regimen: weekly esketamine dosing or every other week esketamine dosing.


Number of Changes: 0 = weekly dose throughout OP/MA phase; 1 = 1 change from weekly to every other week (EOW); 2 = change from EOW back to weekly; 3 = 2 changes from weekly to EOW remained on EOW; 4 = 2 changes from weekly to EOW and back to weekly; 5 = 3 changes from weekly to EOW, remaining on EOW; 6 = 3 changes from weekly to EOW and back to weekly.



a Approximately 22% returned to weekly in total 46% on weekly and 16% returned to every other week (in total 54% onevery other week).







Efficacy Analyses

The efficacy analyses were performed on the full analysis sets for the IND and OP/MA phases including all enrolled subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study medication or 1 dose of oral antidepressant study medication in the respective phases.


Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The mean change (SD) from Baseline (IND) in MADRS total score to End Point (IND) was −16.4 (8.76) for esketamine+oral AD. The mean change (SD) from Baseline (OP/MA) in MADRS total score to End Point (OP/MA) was 0.3 (8.12) for esketamine+oral AD. See, FIG. 2.


Response (≥50% improvement from Baseline (IND) in the MADRS total score) and Remission (MADRS total score is ≤12) rates are presented for the IND and OP/MA phases in Tables 12 and 13, respectively.


At End Point in the IND phase, the response rate was 78.4% and remission rate was 47.2%; of the responders proceeding to the OP/MA phase, 76.5% were responders and 58.2% were remitters at endpoint. Functional recovery measured by SDS followed with some lag time after mood improvement. At endpoint of the IND, remission rate measured by SDS at endpoint of the IND phase (21.1%, observed case). The remission rate doubled throughout the OP/MA phase (25.2% at week 4 to 51.1% at week 48, observed case). See, FIG. 3.









TABLE 12







Response and Remission Rates Based on MADRS; Induction


Phase (Study ESKETINTRD3004: Full (IND) Analysis Set)










Response
Remission



Intranasal Esk + Oral AD
Intranasal Esk + Oral AD













Day 8
 86/739 (11.6%)
54/739 (7.3%)


Day 15
185/702 (26.4%)
115/702 (16.4%)


Day 22
312/683 (45.7%)
199/683 (29.1%)


Day 28
581/688 (84.4%)
349/688 (50.7%)


End Point
593/756 (78.4%)
357/756 (47.2%)


(IND)





A subject is defined as a responder at a given time point if the percent improvement from baseline (IND) in MADRS total score is at least 50%. A subject is in remission at a given time point if the MADRS total score is ≤12.













TABLE 13







Response and Remission Rates Based on MADRS;


Optimization/Maintenance Phase (Study ESKETINTRD3004:


Full (OP/MA) Analysis Set)










Response
Remission



Intranasal Esk + Oral AD
Intranasal Esk + Oral AD













Week 1
513/583 (88.0%)
325/583 (55.7%)


Week 8
408/530 (77.0%)
277/530 (52.3%)


Week 16
355/446 (79.6%)
273/446 (61.2%)


Week 24
278/346 (80.3%)
203/346 (58.7%)


Week 32
226/284 (79.6%)
178/284 (62.7%)


Week 40
171/210 (81.4%)
127/210 (60.5%)


Week 48
124/139 (89.2%)
 95/139 (68.3%)


End Point
461/603 (76.5%)
351/603 (58.2%)


(OP/MA)





A subject is defined as a responder at a given time point if the percent improvement from baseline (IND) in MADRS total score is at least 50%. A subject is in remission at a given time point if the MADRS total score is ≤12.






Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Total Score

The mean change (SD) from Baseline (IND) in PHQ-9 total score to End Point (IND) was −8.9 (6.67) for esketamine+oral AD. The mean change (SD) from Baseline (OP/MA) in PHQ-9 total score to End Point (OP/MA) was −0.2 (5.65) for esketamine+oral AD. See, FIG. 4.


Example 2

Samples of venous blood were obtained from patients and healthy control subjects from subject described in Example 1 and from the other clinical trials referenced herein. Serum or plasma was prepared from the samples of venous blood. Measurements of human CRP and IL-6-R were performed in serum using an MSD Sector 6000 with the kits #K151STD and K151ALC (MesoScale Discovery, Rockville, MD). Human TNFα was quantified in serum using a Simoa HD-1 analyzer with kit #143 (Quanterix, Lexington, MA). All measures were performed according to kit manufacturer's recommendations.


As used in the following biomarker assay analysis, treatment (TRT) refers to treatment with intranasal esketamine plus optionally an oral antidepressant and placebo (PBO) refers to treatment with a placebo plus optionally an oral antidepressant.


The following biomarker signatures were employed:

    • 3MM: Inflammatory biomarker signature with positive status defined by CRP>3 mg/L and (TNFα>4 μg/mL or sIL6R>25 ng/mL).
    • 2MM: Inflammatory biomarker signature with positive status defined by CRP>3 mg/L and sIL6R>25 ng/mL.
    • CRP: Inflammatory biomarker signature with positive status defined by CRP>3 mg/L/


The 3MM signature was tested in clinical trials for adjunctive MDD, including treatment-resistant MDD (TRD) and MDD with suicidal ideation (SUI). The effect of 3MM across clinical trials is shows in FIG. 5. Significant was driven by Esketamine (ESK) TRD trials. Esketamine TRD exhibits the most robust effects with respect to high-inflammation biotypes ((“CRP”>3 mg/L and (TNFα>4 pg/mL or sIL6R>25 ng/mL)). In the esketamine trials with suicidal ideation (SUI), 3MM status at baseline did not predict treatment effect. A nominally significant (post-hoc, no correction for multiple testing) differentiation was seen in esketamine TRD trials (see FIG. 6). Colors represent ranges of n's of subjects and shapes represent p values, the gray shaded area indicates a MADRS change lower than 3 points.


Across the esketamine TRD trials, a significant greater treatment effect in biomarker signature positive subjects was evident in 3 out of 4 studies: 3MM biomarker signature positive subjects (TE SigPos, left panel of FIG. 6) improved by 7.8 MADRS points over placebo at the end of the double blind treatment, a significantly greater (p<0.01) treatment effect than in the biomarker signature negative subjects (TE SigNeg, middle panel of FIG. 6), who only improved by 2 MADRS points, resulting in a 5.8 point difference between subtypes (Signature advantage, right panel of FIG. 6). A large treatment effect of 11.69 points change in MADRS was also seen in TRD2003 in biomarker signature positive Japanese patients (albeit the n was small, FIG. 7A) compared to 2.83 points in biomarker signature negative Japanese patients (FIG. 7B).


If the 3MM is reduced to a 2MM by removing TNFalpha and only taking CRP and sIL6R into account, the same trends were observed across trials. Also included in the 2MM analysis and the CRP analysis, below, are clinical trials CNTO136MDD2001, 67953964MDD2001, 42847922MDD2001, and 42847922MDD2002, which involve administration of sirukumab (CNTO136MDD2001), aticaprant (67953964MDD2001), and seltorexant (42847922MDD2001 and NCT03321526). The overall effect in the biomarker signature positive group (left panels of FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B) is 4.2 points improvement in MADRS across all trials with 2MM (FIG. 8A) versus 4.6 points with 3MM (FIG. 8B), compared to 1.1 points in the biomarker signature negative group (middle panels of FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B) with 2MM and 1.0 with 3MM resulting in a signature advantage (right panel of FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B) of 3 points with 2MM versus 3.6 points with 3MM. Therefore, including TNFalpha in the model optimizes the biomarker signature effect and also captures a larger n of patients. In FIG. 8A, TRD2003 and TRD2003 are trending rather than significant due to flipping the identity of one individual in each study.


When the model is reduced to CRP levels only, the treatment effects observed with 3MM or 2MM are weaker and more variable. The overall effect in the biomarker signature positive group (left panels of FIG. 9) is 3.5 points improvement in MADRS across all trials CRP only (FIG. 9) versus 4.6 points with 3MM (FIG. 8B), compared to 1.2 points in the biomarker signature negative group (middle panel of FIG. 9) with CRP only and 1.0 with 3MM resulting in a signature advantage (right panel of FIG. 9) of only 2.3 points with CRP only versus 3.6 points with 3MM. Therefore, a single marker (CRP) is not as robust as using a combination of markers. In FIG. 9, TRD3002 is trending due to membership differences for 20 subjects relative to 3MM.


While the foregoing specification teaches the principles of the present invention, with examples provided for the purpose of illustration, it will be understood that the practice of the invention encompasses all of the usual variations, adaptations and/or modifications as come within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating depression comprising intranasally administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of esketamine, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if a biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having a level of at least one biomarker that is greater or less than a reference biomarker level.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, the method having an induction phase and, optionally, a subsequent maintenance phase, wherein the induction phase comprises induction phase treatment sessions at a given frequency, and the maintenance phase comprises maintenance phase treatment sessions administered to the patient less frequently.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, comprising intranasally administering about 28 mg to about 84 mg of esketamine per induction phase treatment session to said patient, wherein the induction phase treatment session occurs at a frequency of twice weekly during an the induction phase; and, optionallyintranasally administering about 56 mg to about 84 mg of esketamine per maintenance phase treatment session to said patient, wherein the maintenance phase treatment session occurs at a frequency of once weekly or once every other week.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the induction phase has a duration of about 4 weeks.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein about 56 or about 84 mg of esketamine is administered per induction phase treatment session.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein about 56 or about 84 mg of esketamine is administered per maintenance phase treatment session.
  • 7. The method of claim 2, wherein the esketamine is delivered from an intranasal device in 2 or more sprays during the induction phase and/or the maintenance phase.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of an oral antidepressant to said patient during the induction and/or maintenance phase.
  • 9. The method of claim 2, wherein the esketamine is administered as its corresponding hydrochloride salt during the induction phase and/or the maintenance phase.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the depression comprises major depressive disorder.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the major depressive disorder is major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation or behavior.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the major depressive disorder is treatment resistant depression.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the patient is identified as biomarker signature positive if the biological sample obtained from the patient is identified as having: a. a level of CRP greater than a reference CRP level, andb. at least one of: i. a level of TNF-alpha that is greater than a reference TNF-alpha level, andii. a level of sIL6R that is greater than a reference sIL6R level.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the reference CRP level is about 3 mg/L.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the reference TNF-alpha level is about 4 pg/mL.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the reference sIL6R level is about 25 ng/mL.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 63/298,067, filed on Jan. 10, 2022, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2023/050172 1/9/2023 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63298067 Jan 2022 US