Compositions and methods thereof increasing plant growth and resistance to environmental stress

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10526255
  • Patent Number
    10,526,255
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 8, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 7, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Compositions and methods for enhancing plant growth and resistance to adverse abiotic conditions are disclosed.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the fields of agriculture and propagation of plants under abiotic stress conditions. More specifically, the invention provides methods and microbial based compositions which facilitate improved plant growth and stress tolerance.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Several publications and patent documents are referenced throughout this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains. The disclosure of each of these publications and patent documents is incorporated by reference herein.


Pine barrens (pinelands) comprise a unique type of eco-system that is oligotrophic, and both drought- and fire-prone. Pine barrens occur throughout northeastern USA from New Jersey to Maine (Forman et al. 1998). Pines and oaks are the most common trees in pine barrens, while the understory is composed of grasses (Poaceae), sedges (Cyperaceae), blueberries and other members of heath family (Ericaceae). The largest and most uniform area of pine barrens in the United States is the 1.4 million acre pine barrens of New Jersey, where the soil is highly acidic, sandy and nutrient poor.


Dark septate endophytes (DSE) refer to a group of heterogeneous plant root-colonizing ascomycetes that produce melanized, septate hyphae. They have been isolated from over 110 plant families that grow in various environments (Knapp et al. 2012). The best studied DSE are the Phialocephala fortinii-Acephala applanata complex (PAC), a group of asexual fungi in Helotiales of Leotiomycetes (Wang et al. 2006). Fungi in PAC are characterized by darkly pigmented hyphae, and typically produce branched conidiophores, hyaline phialides with collarettes, and intracellular microsclerotia (Grünig et al. 2008a, 2008b; Yu et al. 2001). PAC are the common root associates of many tree species, specifically conifers in forests of the northern hemisphere (Grünig et al. 2008a, 2008b; Menkis 2004). Despite the global pervasiveness of DSE, their ecological roles, phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy remain poorly understood (Knapp et al. 2012; Mandyam and Jumpponen 2005). DSE fungal-plant interaction studies have yielded variable results, likely due to the use of differing experimental design strategies (Grünig et al. 2008b).


It is estimated that 30% of the world's total land area consists of acid soils, and 50% of the world's potential arable lands are acidic (Tuininga et al. 2004). In view of these adverse environmental conditions, improved methods to enhance growth of both edible and non-edible plants are needed.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, a method for enhancing overall plant growth and resistance to adverse abiotic conditions comprising contacting a plant or seed therefrom with a composition comprising a biofertilizer comprising at least one endophytic fungi and optionally bacteria. In one aspect, the fungi is Acidomelania panicicola and the optional bacteria is from the Burkholderia genus. The method can include inoculating the seeds with the fungi and, or bacteria in agar or growth medium and placing seeds/agar composition in the soil. In another approach, after mixing the cultures, the seeds and cultures are subjected to drying to form a coating thereon. Vermiculite and rock phosphate may also be included in the composition to enhance plant growth and resistance to abiotic stress. The method can be applied to both monocots and dicots and can be used on plants which include without limitation, lettuce, corn, rice, soybeans, potatoes, barley, wheat, and carrots. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the plant is a turfgrass plant selected from a Ryegrass, Kentucky Bluegrass, Tall Fescue, Bermuda, St. Augustine or Zoysia plant or any other turfgrass plant.


In another aspect of the invention, a biofertilizer composition is provided. An exemplary biofertilizer includes an effective amount of A. panicicola and at least one agent or microorganism for promoting plant growth and resistance to abiotic stresses for use in the method described above. In a preferred embodiment, the composition contains A. panicicola and at least one Burkholderia species in equal concentrations. The composition may also contain a sun protecting product and a polysaccharide solution. The fungal strains may also be encapsulated in allignate beads.


In yet another aspect of the invention the fungus for use in the method is selected from the Barrenia genus. In a preferred embodiment, the fungi is Barrenia panicia. This composition may also comprise a bacteria selected from the Burkholderia genus.


The biofertilizer composition comprising at least A. panicicola and, or Barrenia and, optionally, other agents or microbial or fungal species are effective to enhance plant resistance to environmental stresses. Such agents may include gel formulations, agar, vermiculite, sun protectorants, rock phosphate, alginate, which when combined form an efficacious biofertilizer.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from the large subunit of rRNA gene sequence. Bootstraps higher than 70 have thickened branches.



FIG. 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from the internal transcribed spacer sequences of rRNA gene. Bootstraps higher than 70 have thickened branches.



FIG. 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from combined ITS, LSU, and RPB1 gene sequence datasets. Bootstraps higher than 70 have thickened branches.



FIG. 4. DNA sequence for A. applanata AY078151; SEQ ID NO: 1 (FIG. 4A), A. panicicola KF874620; SEQ ID NO: 2 (FIG. 4B), A. panicicola KF874619; SEQ ID NO: 3 (FIG. 4C), A. panicicola AL5m2-2; SEQ ID NO: 4 (FIG. 4D), A. panicicola CM11M2; SEQ ID NO: 5 (FIG. 4E), A. panicicola WSF1-R37; SEQ ID NO: 6 (FIG. 4F), A. taeda CM14-P64; SEQ ID NO: 7 (FIG. 4G), A. taeda WSF14-P22; SEQ ID NO: 8 (FIG. 4H), A. taeda WSF14-P13; SEQ ID NO: 9 (FIG. 4I), C. clavus DQ491502; SEQ ID NO: 10 (FIG. 4J), D. acerina AF141164; SEQ ID NO: 11 (FIG. 4K), H. aureliella JN943611; SEQ ID NO: 12 (FIG. 4L), L. virgineum DQ491485; SEQ ID NO: 13 (FIG. 4M), L. macrospores DQ471005; SEQ ID NO: 14 (FIG. 4N), M. cinerea DQ491498; SEQ ID NO: 15 (FIG. 4O), M. laxa EF153017; SEQ ID NO: 16 (FIG. 4P), P. fortinii AB671499; SEQ ID NO: 17 (FIG. 4Q), and V. truncorum EU434855; SEQ ID NO: 18 (FIG. 4R).



FIGS. 5A-5E. Switchgrass seedling two days after inoculation with Acidomelania panicicola holotype isolate 61R8 (FIG. 5A); Control (FIG. 5B); three days after inoculation with Barrenia panicia holotype isolate WSF1R37 (FIG. 5C); Control (FIG. 5D), Barrenia taeda holotype isolate WSF14P22 (FIG. 5E). Bar=1 mm



FIGS. 6A-6C. Representative image of morphological characters of Barrenia panicia holotype isolate WSF1R37 (FIG. 6A); Representative image of morphological characters of Barrenia panicia holotype isolate WSF1R37 (FIG. 6B); Representative image of morphological characters of Barrenia panicia holotype isolate WSF1R37 (FIG. 6C). A-Bar=10 μm



FIG. 7. Micrographs of control and Acidomelania panicicola inoculated switchgrass seedling roots 2 days post inoculation.



FIG. 8. Micrographs of control and Acidomelania panicicola inoculated rice seedling roots 4 days post inoculation.



FIG. 9. Micrographs showing control, Fusarium oxysporum inoculated and Acidomelania panicicola inoculated switchgrass seedling survival percentage.



FIG. 10. Micrographs showing control, Fusarium oxysporum inoculated and Acidomelania panicicola inoculated switchgrass roots.



FIG. 11. Micrographs showing control and Acidomelania panicicola inoculated lettuce roots 4 days post inoculation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Drought and low nutrient stress typified early terrestrial environments when plant colonization of land occurred and was facilitated by root-symbiotic fungi (Stoyke et al. 1991). Beneficial endophytes encompass bacteria and fungi that have the ability to alleviate abiotic stresses in combination with plant growth promotion. Endophytes have been reported to enhance early root differentiation, improve drought and salinity tolerance and increased survival rate. These endophytes play critical roles in litter decomposition, nutrient absorption and cycling (Forman et al. 1998; Blackwell et al. 2011).


A group of new fungal species were discovered from switchgrass and other grass roots in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, which is a dry, highly acidic environment, low in nutrients (P, K, organic matter etc.), with high aluminum toxicity (von Uexkull et al. 1995). Herein we describe two new genuses, Acidomelania and Barrenia, discovered in pine barren switchgrass roots.



Barrenia was classified using multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, along with phenotypic and ecological characteristics. While the new species was isolated from roots of switchgrass and pitch pine in the acidic and oligotrophic New Jersey Pine Barrens, Barrenia likely has a wide distribution as its internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence has high similarity with a number of GenBank sequences obtained in various ecological studies. The majority of these similar ITS sequences were obtained from roots in plants growing in acidic, nutrient-poor environments, as well as from managed sugarcane plantations. Phylogenetic analyses of ITS, LSU and RPB1 sequence data strongly support that Barrenia is a monophyletic Clade in Helotiales, distinct from any known taxa. Barrenia is phylogenetically close to Acidomelania, Loramyces, Mollisia, and Phialocephala fortinii-Acephala applanata species complex (PAC), the dark septate endophytes. Barrenia can be distinguished from Loramyces and Mollisia by its association with living plant roots. While taxa in PAC also are root endophytes, they have complex phialid arrangements that appear to be lacking in Barrenia.


The present inventors have performed functional studies which demonstrate that application of biofertilizers comprising Acidomelania panicicola and Barrenia panicia significantly enhanced dense root hair growth in switchgrass. Acidomelania pancicola plant-fungal interactions with rice and lettuce seedlings under acidic and poor nutrient conditions also resulted in a significant promotion of root and shoot length.


In one aspect of the invention, a biofertilizer composition is prepared by inoculating seeds with fungi (e.g. Acidomelania panicicola or any fungus selected from the genus Barrenia) on agar or growth medium and placing seeds and agar in the soil. In another aspect of the invention, a biofertilizer composition is prepared by mixing fungi and bacterial cultures with seeds prior to placing seeds in the soil, the cultures optionally forming a coating around the seeds. In a third aspect of the invention, seeds are mixed with fungi and bacterial cultures and dried. In a fourth aspect of the invention, seeds are grown in fungal inoculated soil formulated with vermiculite and rock phosphate.


DEFINITIONS

An endophyte is an endosymbiont, often a bacterium or fungus, that lives within a plant without causing apparent disease. Endophytes may enhance a plant's growth and improve the plant's ability to tolerate abiotic stresses such as drought or harsh soil conditions. In one embodiment an endophyte useful herein comprises the fungus, Acidomelania panicicola. In another embodiment, an endophyte comprises Barrenia panicia. Endophytes useful herein include the fungus Acidomelania panicicola in combination with certain bacteria selected from the bacterial species, Burkholderia. In yet another approach, the fungi Acidomelania panicicola and the fungi Barrenia panicia are used in combination to enhance plant growth under abiotic stress conditions.


The term “abiotic” includes non-living chemical and physical parts of the environment that affect ecosystems. An ecosystem's abiotic factors may be classified via “SWATS” (Soil, Water, Air, Temperature, Sunlight).


The term “biofertilizer” comprises at least one substance containing living microorganisms which, when applied to seed, plant surfaces, and/or soil, colonizes the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promotes growth by increasing the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the host plant. Biofertilizers can also comprise other agents which enhance the growth of the microorganisms present. Such agents include, without limitation, agar, gel, and minerals.


The term “crop” herein refers to any plant grown to be harvested or used for any economic purpose, including for example human foods, livestock fodder, fuel or pharmaceutical production.


The following materials and methods provided to facilitate the practice of the present invention.


Fungal Isolation


Poaceae grass roots were collected from three locations (N 40 12.00, W 74 30.00; N40 04.084, W74 26.696; and N 39 46.136, W 74 40.885) in New Jersey Pine Barrens in 2012 and 2013. Native pitch pine (Pinus rigida) roots were collected from two locations (N40 04.084, W74 26.696; and N 39 46.136, W 74 40.885) in New Jersey Pine Barrens in 2014 (Tables 1 and 2). Soil pH of the sampling locations ranged from 4.7 to 5.2. Root samples were rinsed thoroughly to remove soil from the surface, cut into 10-20 mm pieces then surface disinfected with sequential washes of 95% ethanol for 30 s, 0.5% NaOCl for 2 min and 70% ethanol for 2 min. After several rinses with sterile water and drying, the root samples were cut into 5 mm pieces and plated on acidified malt extract agar (AMEA, 1.5 ml 85% lactic acid per liter of 2% malt extract agar). Plates were incubated at room temperature with 12 h light and 12 h dark cycles. Fungal cultures were transferred to fresh AMEA and purified by sub-culturing from emergent hyphal tips.















TABLE 1








Morphological
Type

Known


Species
MycoBank #
Etymology
description
species
Habitat
distribution







Barrenia E.
MB811715
″Barren″
Colonies on MEA

Barrenia

Endophytic
New Jersey


Walsh & N.

refers to the
darkly pigmented,

panicia

in roots of
Pine


Zhang, gen.

pine barrens
surface fluffy,

Poaceae
Barrens,


nov.

ecosystem
aerial hyphae thick

grasses
United




where the
and light brown.


States




fungi were
Colonies on WA







discovered
light brown; sparse








aerial hyphae.








Sporulation not








observed





















TABLE 2










Other







materials


Species
MycoBank #
Etymology
Morphological Description
Holotype
examined








Barrenia

MB811716
panici
Colonies on MEA 55 mm
United States:
United States:



panicia


refers to the
diam after 20 d in the dark at
New Jersey:
New Jersey:


E. Walsh

host
25 C., Cinnamon Brown,
Wharton State
Assunpink


& N. Zhang,


surface fluffy, aerial hyphae
Forest, N 39
Lake, N 40


sp. nov.


thick and light brown,
45.346, W 074
12.00, W 74





reverse pigmented, Warm
41.684, 3 m
30.00, 3 m alt.,





Sepia. Colonies on WA
alt., from roots
from roots of





reaching 51 mm diam after
of Panicum

Digitaria sp.,






20 d in the dark at 25 C.,

virgatum, 5

30 Aug. 2012,






Ochraceous Tawny, aerial

Jun. 2013, E. Walsh
E. Walsh & N. Zhang





hyphae sparse, reverse
& N. Zhang,
AL5m2;





pigmented, Cinnamon
WSF1R37
Colliers Mills,





Brown. Warm Sepia, paddle-
(RUTPP-
N40 04.084





shaped hyphopodium-like
WSF1R37)
W74 26.696, 5 m





structures formed in

alt., from





inoculated switchgrass root

roots of Coix





tissue


lacryma - jobi,








30 Aug. 2012,







E. Walsh & N. Zhang







CM11m2



Barrenia

MB811717
taeda
Colonies on MEA 28 mm
United States:
United States:



taeda E. Walsh &


means pine
diam after 20 d in the dark at
New Jersey:
New Jersey:


N. Zhang,

wood and
25 C., Cinnamon Brown,
Wharton State
Wharton State


sp. nov.

refers to the
surface fluffy, aerial hyphae
Forest N 39
Forest, N 39




host
thick and light brown,
45.346, W 074
45.346, W 074





reverse pigmented, Mummy
41.684, 3 m
41.684, 3 m





Brown. Colonies on WA
alt., from roots
alt., from roots





reaching 31 mm diam after
of Pinus rigida,
of Pinus rigida,





20 d in the dark at 25 C.,
26 Jun. 2014,
26 Jun. 2014,





Buckthorn Brown, sparse
E. Walsh & N. Zhang
E. Walsh & N. Zhang





aerial hyphae, reverse
WSF14P22
WFS14P13;





pigmented, Buckthorn
(RUTPP-
Colliers Mills,





Brown. Sporulation not
WSF14P22)
N40 04.084





observed

W74 26.696, 5 m







alt., from







roots of Pinus








rigida, 4 Jun.








2014, E. Walsh







& N. Zhang







CM14P64










Morphological Study and Growth Rate


Purified fungal isolates were grown on cellophane overlaid with 2% MEA (BD Difco, Maryland) and 2% water agar (WA). Cultures were incubated at 20° C. in the dark with three replicates. Colony diameter was measured after 20 days. The color names of colonies followed Ridgway (1912).


DNA Extraction, Amplification and Sequencing


Genomic DNA was extracted from fungal mycelium using the UltraClean Soil DNA isolation kit (MoBio, California) following the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was performed with Taq 2X Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Maine), following the manufacturer's instructions. PCR cycling conditions for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the large subunit of ribosomal RNA genes (LSU) consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95° C. for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95° C. for 45 s, 54° C. for 45 s, 72° C. for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72° C. for 5 min. For the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB1), the cycling conditions included an initial denaturation step at 95° C. for 2 min, 35° cycles of 95° C. for 60 s, 55° C. for 1.5 min, 72° C. for 2 min, and a final extension at 72° C. for 10 min. Primers used in this study are as follows: ITS1 and ITS4 for the ITS region (White et al. 1990), ITS1 and LR5 for the LSU locus (Rehner and Samuels 1995), and RPB1 Af (Hall and Stiller 1997) and RPB1 CrRev (Matheny et al. 2002) for the RPB1 gene. PCR products were purified with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, California) and sequenced with the PCR primers by Genscript Inc. (Piscataway, N.J.).


Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses


Six representative isolates of the new taxon (CM11m2, CM14P64, AL5m2, WSF1R37, WSF14P13, and WSF14P22) as well as other reference Leotiomycetes species (Table 3) were included in the phylogenetic analyses. The ITS dataset included sequences of the six new isolates from this study and 15 reference sequences of Helotiales. The LSU dataset included the six new sequences and 28 reference sequences of Helotiales and Rhytismatales. The three-gene (ITS, LSU and RPB1) alignment included the six new sequences and 12 reference sequences of. Sequences were aligned with MUSCLE (Edgar 2004). Maximum likelihood (ML) tree was generated with MEGA 6 (Tamura et al. 2013). Models with the lowest BIC scores (Bayesian Information Criterion) were considered to describe the substitution pattern the best. The best models for LSU, ITS and three-gene datasets were Tamura-3 parameter, Kimura 2-parameter, Kimura 2-parameter, respectively. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites. Bootstrap was computed for 500 replications. All positions containing gaps and missing data were excluded from the analyses.









TABLE 3







Species name, isolate number, host, location and GenBank accession numbers of the fungi used in this


study.














Isolate







Species
number a
Host
Location
ITS
LSU
RPB1






Acephala

CBS109321

Picea abies,

Büdmerenwald,
AY078145
KF951051
AFTOL



applanata


root
Switzerland


3613



Acephala

CBS123555

Pinus

Hubertusstock,
HM189719





macrosclerotium



sylvestris, root

Germany






Acidomelania

CBS137156

Panicum

New Jersey
KF874619
KF874622




panicola



virgatum, root

Pine Barrens,








USA






Acidomelania

CM16s1

Schizachyrium

New Jersey
KF874620
KF874621




panicola



scoparium,

Pine Barrens,







root
USA






Barrenia

AL5m2

Digitaria sp.,

New Jersey






panicia


root
Pine Barrens,








USA






Barrenia

CM11M2

Coix lacrymajobi,

New Jersey






panicia


root
Pine Barrens,








USA






Barrenia

WSF1R37

Panicum

New Jersey






panicia



virgatum, root

Pine Barrens,








USA






Barrenia taeda

CM14P64

Pinus rigida,

New Jersey







root
Pine Barrens,








USA






Barrenia taeda

WSF14P13

Pinus rigida,

New Jersey







root
Pine Barrens,








USA






Barrenia taeda

WSF14P22

Pinus rigida,

New Jersey







root
Pine Barrens,








USA






Botryotinia



Oregon, USA

AY544651




fuckeliana










Bulgaria

CBS118.31

Germany

DQ470960
AFTOL916



inquinas










Chloroscypha



Oregon, USA
U92311





chloromela










Chlorovibressea



New Zealand

DQ257352



sp.









Collembolispora


foam in stream
Nova Ves,

KC005811




aristata



Czech Republic






Cudoniella

AFTOL166
Hemlock cones
Benton County,

DQ470944
DQ471128



clavus


and small
Oregon, USA







sticks







Dermea acerina

CBS161.38

Acer rubrum

Bear Island,
AF141164
DQ247801
DQ471164





Ontario,








Canada






Fabrella tsugae





AF356694




Hyaloscypha



Scotland
JN943611
EU940152
JN985241



aureliella










Hyaloscypha



Kaarina,
FJ477059
FJ477058




vitreola



Finland






Lachnum

AFTOL49

Alnus sp.,

Oregon, USA
DQ491485
AY544646
DQ842030



virgineum


cones







Lambertella

CBS811.85

Aster

Honshu, Japan

DQ470978




subsubrenispora



ageratoides









var. ovata







Leotia lubrica

AFTOL1

Chrysolepis

Oregon, USA

AY544644






chrysophyla








Loramyces

CBS235.53

Equisetum

UK
DQ471005
DQ470957
DQ471149



macrosporus



limosum








Microglossum

AFTOL1292

Tennessee,

DQ470981
DQ471179



rufum



USA






Mollista cinerea

CBS122029
fallen log
Alsea Falls,
DQ491498
DQ470942
DQ471122





Oregon, USA






Mollisia

ICMP18083

Actinidia

New Zealand

HM116757




dextrinospora



deliciosa cv.










Hayward








Monilinia laxa

CBS122031



AY544670
FJ238425



Neobulgaria



Finland

EU940141




lilacina










Neobulgaria

CBS477.97
log with moss
New York,

FJ176865




pura



USA






Neofabrea

CBS122030

Malus sp.

Oregon, USA

AY544662




malicorticis










Phialocephala

CBS300.62
slime in pulp

AF486121
AB671465




dimorphospora


mill







Phialocephala

CBS443.86

Pinus

Suonenjoki,
AB671499
AB671466




fortinii



sylvestris, root

Finland






Phialocephala

CBS468.94

Picea abies,

Regensburg,
AF486126





scopiformis


bark
Germany






Spathularia



Tsuga

Tennessee,

FJ99786




velutipes



Canadensis

USA






Varicosporium



Svalbard,

JN941371




elodeae



Norway






Vibressea

CBS258.91

Populus,

Ontario,
EU434854
FJ176874
FJ238438



truncorum


submerged
Canada







root







Acephala sp.c



Cymbidium

China
HQ889709







insigne








Acephala sp.c


Sugarcane,
Brazil
GU973749






root







Phialocephala



Rhododendron,

Smoky
JQ272328




sp.c

root
Mountain








National Park,








USA






a AFTOL = Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life project; ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia, USA; CBS = Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ICMP = International Collection of Micro-organisms from Plants, Lincoln, New Zealand.




b Numbers in boldface indicating new sequences from this study.




c Taxon name was copied from GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis in this study indicated that they belong to Barrenia.








Plant-fungal Interaction Experiment


Fungal isolates WSF1R37, WSF14P22, and A. panicicola isolate 61R8 were used in the seedling inoculation experiment. Switchgrass (‘Kanlow’) seeds were surface disinfected as follows: 95% ethanol for 30 s, 0.5% NaOCl for 1 min, 70% ethanol for 1 min, rinsed with sterile distilled H2O and allowed to germinate in the dark at 25° C. for 3 days. Agargel (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) plates were made following manufacturer's instructions, and were cut in half, with one side removed. On the cut surface of an Agargel plate, three 10 mm×10 mm×5 mm plugs from a one-week old fungal culture grown on MEA were placed equidistance from one another. Germinated switchgrass seeds with visible radicle were then placed on the plugs. Sterile MEA plugs were used as negative control. Cultures were incubated at 25° C. under 12 hr light and dark cycle with nine replicates. Root length was measured 7 days after inoculation.


The following examples are provided to illustrate certain embodiments of the invention. They are not intended to limit the invention in any way.


EXAMPLE I

Barrenia, a New Genus Associated with Roots of Switchgrass and Pine in the Oligotrophic Pine Barrens, Promotes Root Hair Growth

A. Culture Morphology and Growth Rate


Isolate WSF1R37 produced dense Cinnamon Brown mycelium on MEA, and Ochraceous Tawny mycelium on WA. Colony diameter measurements for isolate WSF1R37 after 20 days were 75 mm on average on MEA with standard deviation (SD) of 2.6, and 47 mm on average on WA with SD of 2.6. Isolate WSF14P22 produced dense Cinnamon Brown mycelium on MEA, and Buckthorn Brown mycelium on WA. Colony diameter measurements for isolate WSF14P22 after 20 days were 28 mm on average on MEA with SD of 0.6, and 26 mm on average on WA with SD of 1.0.


B. Sequence Data and Phylogeny


There were 173 characters in the LSU alignment, 377 in ITS and 1291 in the three-gene alignment. Maximum likelihood trees based on LSU, ITS and three gene sequences are shown in FIGS. 1-3. All three phylogenies supported that the new isolates formed a monophyletic clade in Helotiales separated from any known taxa. The LSU tree indicated that they were close to Acidomelania panicicola, Loramyces macrosporus, Mollisia cinerea and PAC. The ITS tree showed that these new isolates were closely related to A. panicicola, M. cinerea, Phialocephala scopiformis and L. macrosporus. In the ITS tree, isolates WSF1R37, AL5m2, and CM11m2 formed a well-supported group, while isolates WSF14P22, WSF14P13, and CM14P64 formed another. The two groups were also recognized and supported by the LSU and RPB1 trees, and variation in the phylogenetic relationships of these isolates only occurred within the groups. DNA sequence information for the different fungal species is displayed in FIGS. 4A-4R.


Based on the molecular phylogenetic analyses, morphological characters and their ecological features, a new genus and two new species have been identified. Barrenia differs from Loramyces by its association with living plant roots while Loramyces species are associated with submerged dead plants (Digby and Goos 1987; Ingold and Chapman 1952; Weston 1929). Taxa in the PAC are also root endophytes, but they exhibit complex phialid arrangements that appear to be lacking in Barrenia. Barrenia also differs from Mollisia because of its lack of phialide producing conidia. Moreover, Barrenia has 93% or less ITS sequence similarity to the above-mentioned close relatives or any other described species with accessible ITS sequences. The two Barrenia species differ from each other on host and growth rate. The pine associated B. taeda exhibited slower growth than the grass associated B. panicia on both WA and MEA. There is a 96% similarity in ITS sequences between B. panicia and B. taeda.


C. Plant-Fungal Interaction Experiment


Switchgrass seedlings inoculated with A. panicicola isolate 61R8 and B. panicia WSF1R37 produced dense root hairs all the way to the root apical meristem area, while the control seedlings only produced dense root hairs at the region of maturation of the root (FIGS. 5A and 5C). In addition, the roots inoculated with A. panicicola isolate 61R8 and panicia WSF1R37 had a serpentine growth pattern, while the control roots were straight. Hyphopodia-like strutures were observed on the switchgrass seedling roots inoculated with B. panicia WSF1R37 (FIG. 6A-6C). Root length for seedlings inoculated with B. panicia WSF1R37 after 7 days were 17.4 mm on average with SD of 1.8, not significantly different from the control, which was 19 mm on average with SD of 5.1. Seedlings inoculated with B. taeda WSF14P22 showed no difference in root hair production with the control. Root length for B. taeda WSF14P22 after 7 days was 8.1 mm on average with SD of 1.6, which was significantly shorter than the control (FIG. 5E).


Discussion

Our recent survey on fungi associated with grass roots uncovered a number of novel DSE in Leotiomycetes from the pine barrens ecosystem (Luo et al. 2014a, 2014b; Walsh et al. 2014). Leotiomycetes are morphologically and ecologically diverse and the phylogenetic relationships within this class are not well resolved due to lack of molecular data (Wang et al. 2006). Based on the multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, the new genus Barrenia described here belongs to Helotiales, which encompasses plant pathogens, saprobes and endophytes. The dark, septate hyphal morphology of Barrenia spp., their root-colonizing habit and phylogenetic closeness to PAC indicate that they likely are also DSE.


The best studied DSE is the PAC, specifically P. fortinii. However, the ecological functions of PAC and other DSE remain elusive. Host-fungal interaction experiments often yielded inconsistent results under various experimental conditions in different laboratories (Mandyam and Jumpponen 2005). This prompted us to examine the interaction between B. panicia, B. taeda, A. panicicola and switchgrass, which is the host of B. panicia and A. panicicola. Our inoculation results indicated that A. panicicola and B. panicia remarkably promoted the root hair growth in switchgrass. In switchgrass roots, B. panicia produced hyphopodium-like structures, which may perform penetration and nutrient exchange function between the fungus and the host plant (Delaux et al. 2013; Walker 1980). Barrenia taeda, originally isolated from pine roots, had negative effect on root elongation in switchgrass seedlings. These results corroborate Mandyam et al. (2010; 2012) that while DSE fungi have a broad host range, their effects and characteristics can be considered host specific.


The phylogenetic analysis in this study indicated that Barrenia is close to Acidomelania, Loramyces, Mollisia, and PAC. The phylogenetic proximity of Mollisia, Loramyces and PAC was also supported by Zijlstra et al. (2005) and Wang et al. (2006). Barrenia can be distinguished from Loramyces and Mollisia by its association with living plant roots. While taxa in PAC also are root endophytes, morphologically they can be distinguished from Barrenia. In addition, Barrenia has 93% or less ITS sequence similarities to the above-mentioned close relatives or any other described species with accessible ITS sequences. The family placement of Barrenia is not determined here because the Leotiomycetes phylogeny is poorly resolved and several families in this class likely are polyphyletic (Wang et al. 2006).


The six Barrenia isolates from New Jersey Pine Barrens were grouped into two well-supported clades. We delimited the two species based on the genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (Taylor et al. 2000). The BLAST results in GenBank indicated that Barrenia might have a wide distribution. Sixteen ITS sequences in GenBank had 97-99% identity with that of B. panicia isolate WSF1R37, for example, GU973749 from sugarcane root in Brazil, HQ889709 from Cymbidium insigne root in China, and AY599235 from grass root in The Netherlands. Twelve ITS sequences in GenBank had 97-99% identities with that of B. taeda isolate WSF14P22, for example, JQ272328 from Rhododendron root in USA and KJ817299 from Vaccinium vitis-idaea in Inner Mongolia. The host plants of the matched sequences in GenBank are largely Ericaceae, terrestrial orchids, grasses and conifers, usually found in acidic and infertile soils (Keddy 2007). This distribution pattern was also found in Acidomelania panicicola, the other root associated fungus frequently isolated from the pine barrens (Walsh et al. 2014).


Additional experiments to uncover fungal-plant interactions included the inoculation of switchgrass seedlings with A. panicicola isolate 61R8 and B. panicia WSF1R37 produced dense root hairs all the way to the root apical meristem area, while the control seedlings only produced dense root hairs at the region of maturation of the root. In addition, the roots inoculated with A. panicicola isolate 61R8 and B. panicia WSF1R37 had a serpentine growth pattern, while the control roots were straight. The plant growth promotion effect of A. panicicola and B. panicia discovered in this study coupled with their distribution pattern indicate that these species may play a role in plant adaptation to acid, low nutrient soils.


In conclusion, we discovered a new genus and two species of root-colonizing fungi associated with plants living in an acidic, nutrient poor environment. The phylogenetic and taxonomic work and the plant-fungal interaction results reported here will aid future ecological and evolutionary studies on root-associated fungi.


EXAMPLE II
Endophytic Fungi from Pine Barrens Grasses Promote Plant Growth in Acidic, High Aluminum Toxicity and Low Nutrient Conditions

A. Fungal Inoculation of Seeds on Agar


In this study, we performed functional studies that demonstrated that Acidomelania panicocola inoculation of seeds significantly increased root hair growth in switchgrass, rice and lettuce seedlings compared to the control.


To assess the effects of Acidomelania panicicola inoculation of switchgrass and rice seedlings on root hair abundance, fungus was grown on water agar under room temperature for 7 days. Seeds were germinated in sterile distilled water in a petri dish under room temperature in the dark for 7 days. Seedlings (roots down) were inserted in the 7 day-old fungal agar culture. Control seedlings were uninoculated but grown under the same conditions. Significant differences in root hair abundance were observed in inoculated seedlings when compared to negative, untreated controls (FIGS. 7 and 8). These findings indicate that Acidomelania panicicola inoculation enhances root hair abundance.


To evaluate switchgrass seedling survival percent and root and shoot length, switchgrass seeds were next inoculated with Acidomelania panicicola or Fusarium oxysporum or uninoculated using the method described above and agar and seedlings were covered with top soil. 6 days post-inoculation, Acidomelania panicicola inoculated seedlings exhibited a significant increase in survival (FIG. 9). Root and shoot length of switchgrass seedlings were visualized 8 days after inoculation when enhanced root and shoot length were observed (FIG. 10). These results demonstrate that colonization of switchgrass seedlings with Acidomelania panicicola enhances switchgrass growth and survival.


To assess the effects of Acidomelania panicicola inoculation on lettuce seed growth, seeds were inoculated and germinated as described above. Root length was assessed 4 days after inoculation. Increased root growth was observed for the inoculated lettuce seedlings (FIG. 11). These findings indicate that Acidomelania panicicola can enhance growth of edible plants.


B. Bacterial and Fungal Mixing and Inoculation of Seeds


Fungus (e.g. Acidomelania panicicola) is grown on water agar or other growth media under room temperature for 7 days. Bacterium (e.g. Burkholderia sp.) is cultured in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) overnight at 28° C. Seeds are mixed with the bacterial culture and the fungal cultures (ratio: 500 seeds: 10 mL overnight bacterial culture: 1 Petri dish 7 day old fungal culture) and placed on soil (e.g. Pine Barrens soil or other nutrient-poor soils). Seeds are then covered with top soil and grown under sufficient light.


C. Bacterial and Fungal Mixing, Inoculation and Drying of Seeds


Fungus (e.g. Acidomelania panicicola) is grown on water agar or other growth media under room temperature for 7 days. Bacteria (e.g. Burkholderia sp.) are grown in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) overnight at 28° C. Seeds are mixed with the bacterial culture and the fungal cultures (ratio: 500 seeds: 10 mL overnight bacterial culture: 1 Petri dish 7 day old fungal culture) and dried. Seeds are placed on soil (e.g. Pine Barrens soil or other nutrient-poor soils). Seeds are then covered with top soil and grown under sufficient light.


D. Bacterial and Fungal Mixing, Inoculation of Soil Formulated with Vermiculite and Rock Phosphate


Fungus (e.g. Acidomelania panicicola) is grown on water agar or other growth media under room temperature for 7 days. Bacterium (e.g. Burkholderia sp.) are grown in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) overnight at 28° C. Soil formulated with vermiculite and rock phosphate is inoculated with the fungal and bacterial cultures.


Discussion

Roots were an early development in plant life evolving on land during the Devonian Period (416 to 360 million years ago; (von Uexkull et al. 1995)). The fossil record and molecular phylogenetic analysis suggest that from the outset, mycorrhizal fungi played a crucial role in facilitating plant invasion of land, which was dry and poor in nutrients at the time of colonization (Gensel et al. 2001). Such drought and low nutrient stress continue to challenge plants living in many extant habitats.


We describe herein a novel endophytic fungi, Acidomelania panicicola, for use alone, and optionally in the presence bacteria, which enter the root-interior and colonize the tissues of the plant, thereby effectively promoting plant growth and survival. Given that there are limited techniques—both time consuming and cost-intensive—to prevent adverse effects of abiotic stressors on plant growth, the present studies demonstrating that application of a biofertilizer comprising Acidomelania to seeds or seedlings results in increased seedling survival rate, root hair abundance, and root and shoot length will have great utility for promoting plant growth under adverse environmental conditions.


EXAMPLE III
Liquid Formulation of the BioFertilizer for Seed Coating

This example provides a liquid formulation of biofertilizer, where the formulation consists of two separate solutions that are combined before use as a seed coating.


For the first solution, the fungi are grown in a 1 L flask using an adequate medium and are concentrated by centrifugation in order to separate the solid. This solid is then suspended in a minimum amount of media. A sun protecting product, such as Congo red or green colorant can also be added to the media at 1% (w/v).


According to one preferred embodiment, A. panicicola only is used for the first solution in similar initial concentrations. In a second embodiment, the first solution contains a fungus from the genus Barrenia only (e.g. B. panicia). In another embodiment, the first solution is comprised of A. panicicola and at least one fungus from the genus Barrenia (e.g. B. panicia). In another embodiment, the first solution contains a mixture of A. panicicola and at least one bacteria from the genus Burkholderia. In another embodiment, a mixture of B. panicia and at least one bacteria from the genus Burkholderia is contained within the first solution.


For the second solution, a 1% (w/v) solution of a polysaccharide, such as guar gum, gelan gum, pectin, carboxymetil cellulose, agar-agar, xantan gum (or other food hydrocolloid) is prepared to be used as sticker. The two solutions are then mixed together to treat plant seeds as a coating. The seed should be dried before planting and it is preferable to wait at least two hours after application prior to planting.


EXAMPLE IV
Solid State Formulation of the Biofertilizer of the Invention

This example provides a liquid formulation of a biofertilizer where the fungi and optionally bacteria are encapsulated and the fertilizer is in solid form. Alginate beads were prepared as follows: 1 ml of 30% glycerol was added to 1, 1.5 or 2% sodium alginate solution, depending on the alginate properties (M/G ratio) to obtain a final volume of 25 ml. Then, 250 ml of culture (obtained from a culture of A. panicicola only, a fungus from the genus Barrenia only (e.g. B. panicia), or a mixture of A. panicicola and Burkholderia, or a mixture of A. panicicola and Barrenia (e.g. B. panicia) was centrifuged, the cell pellet was washed with saline (0.85% NaCl, w/v) and suspended in 25 ml of alginate mixture and mixed thoroughly. This suspension was added drop wise into a pre-cooled sterile 1.5 or 2% (w/v) aqueous solution of CaCl2 under mild agitation to obtain the fungal-alginate beads. These beads were allowed to harden for 2-4 h at room temperature. Beads were collected by sieving and were washed several times with sterile water and stored at 4° C. In order to preserve the formulation, the fresh wet beads were frozen at −80° C. prior to lyophilization at −45° C. for 15 h. The lyophilized dry beads were stored in sterile glass bottles.


REFERENCES



  • Blackwell M. 2011. The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 . . . 5.1 Million Species? Am J. Bot. 98:426-438.

  • Delaux P M, Sejalon-Delmas N, Becard G, Ane J M, 2013. Evolution of the plant-microbe symbiotic ‘toolkit’. Trends in Plant Science 18:298-304.

  • Digby S, Goos R, 1987. Morphology, development and taxonomy of Loramyces. Alycologia 79:821-831

  • Dighton J, Tuininga A R, Gray D M, Huskins R E, Belton T, 2004. Impacts of atmospheric deposition on New Jersey pine barrens forest soils and communities of ectomycorrhizae. Forest Ecology and Management 201:131-144.

  • Edgar R C, 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792-1797.

  • Forman R T, 1998. Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape. Rutgers University Press, New Jersey.

  • Gensel, P. G., Kotyk, M. E., Basinger, J. F. 2001. Morphology of Above and Below Ground Structures in Earl Devonian (Pragian-Emsian) Plants, in: P G G D E (Eds), Plants

  • Invade the Land: Evolutionary and Environmental Perspectives. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 83-102.

  • Grünig C R, Duo A, Sieber T, Holdenrieder 0, 2008a. Assignment of species rank to six reproductively isolated cryptic species of the Phialocephala fortinii s.1.-Acephala applanata species complex. Mycologia 100:47-67.

  • Grünig C R, Queloz V, Sieber T N, Holdenrieder 0, 2008b. Dark septate endophytes (DSE) of the Phialocephala fortinii s.1.-Acephala applanata species complex in tree roots: classification, population biology, and ecology. Botany 86:1355-1369.

  • Hall B D, Stiller J W, 1997. The origin of red algae: Implications for plastid evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:4520-4525.

  • Ingold C T, Chapman B, 1952. Aquatic Ascomycetes: Lorwnyces juncicola Weston and L. macrospora n. sp. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 35:268-272

  • Keddy P A, 2007. Plants And Vegetation: Origins, Processes, Consequences. Cambridge University Press, U K.

  • Knapp D G, Pintye A, Kovacs G M, 2012. The dark side is not fastidious—dark septate endophytic fungi of native and invasive plants of semiarid sandy areas. PLoS ONE 7:e32570.

  • Luo J, Walsh E, Naik A, Zhuang W, Zhang K, Cai L, Zhang N, 2014a. Temperate pine barrens and tropical rain forests are both rich in undescribed fungi. PLoS ONE 9:e103753.

  • Luo J, Walsh E, Zhang N, 2014b. Four new species in Magnaporthaceae from grass roots in New Jersey Pine Barrens. Mycologia 106: 580-588.

  • Mandyam K, Fox C, Jumpponen A, 2012. Septate endophyte colonization and host responses of grasses and forbs native to a tallgrass prairie. Mycorrhiza 22:109-119.

  • Mandyam K, Jumpponen A, 2005. Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi. Studies in Mycology 53:173-189.

  • Mandyam K, Loughin T, Jumpponen A, 2010. Isolation and morphological and metabolic characterization of common endophytes in annually burned tallgrass prairie. Mycologia 102:813-821.

  • Matheny P L, Liu Y J, Ammirati J F, Hall, B D, 2002. Using Rpb1 Sequences To Improve

  • Phylogenetic Inference Among Mushrooms (Inocybe, Agaricales). American Journal of Botany 89:688-698.

  • Menkis A, Allmer J, Vasiliauskas R, Lygis V, Stenlid J, Finlay R, 2004. Ecology and molecular characterization of dark septate fungi from roots, living stems, coarse and fine woody debris. Mycological Research 108:965-973.

  • Otgonsuren B, Lee M J, 2013. Ectomycorrhiza Enhanced the Cold-Acclimation Growth and Freeze Tolerance of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 28:97-111.

  • Rehner S A, Samuels G J, 1995. “Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales—a teleomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs.” Canadian Journal of Botany 73:S816-S823.

  • Ridgway R, 1912. Color standards and color nomenclature. The author, Washington D. C.

  • Stoyke, G, Currah, R. S. 1991. Endophytic Fungi from the Mycorrhizae of Alpine Ericoid Plants. Can J. Bot. 69: 347-352.

  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S, 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:2725-2729.

  • Taylor J W, Jacobson D J, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser D M, Hibbett D S, Fisher M C, 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31:21-32.

  • Tedrow J C F, 1952. Soil Conditions in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Bartonia 26: 28-35.

  • Tuininga, A. R., Dighton, J. 2004. Changes In Ectomycorrhizal Communities and Nutrient Availability Following Prescribed Burns in Two Upland Pine-Oak Forests In the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Can J. Forest Res. 34: 1755-1765.

  • von Uexkull, H. R., Mutert, E. 1995. Global Extent, Development and Economic-impact of Acid Soils. Plant Soil. 171:1-15.

  • Walker J, 1980. Gaeumannomyces, Linocarpon, Ophiobolus and several other genera of scolecospored ascomycetes and Phialophora conidial states, with a note on hyphopodia. Mycotaxon 11:1-129.

  • Walsh E, Luo J, Zhang N, 2014. Acidomelania panicicola gen. et sp. nov. from switchgrass roots in acidic New Jersey pine barrens. Mycologia 106:856-864.

  • Wang Z, Johnston P R, Takamatsu S, Spatafora J W, Hibbett D S, 2006. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Leotiomycetes based on rDNA data. Mycologia 98:1065-1075.

  • Weston W H, 1929. Observations on Loramyces, an undescribed aquatic ascomycete. Mycologia 21:55-76.

  • White T J, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J, 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. New York: Academic Press.

  • Yu T, Nassuth A, Peterson R L, 2001. Characterization of the interaction between the dark septate fungus Phialocephala fortinii and Asparagus officinalis roots. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 47:741-753.

  • Zijlstra J, Van′t Hof P, Baar J, Verkley G, Summerbell R, Paradi I, Braakhekke W, Berendse F, 2005. Diversity of symbiotic root endophytes of the Helotiales in ericaceous plants and the grass, Dechampsia flexuosa. Studies in Mycology 53:147-162.



While certain of the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described and specifically exemplified above, it is not intended that the invention be limited to such embodiments. Various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention, as set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A biofertilizer composition for application to seeds, plant surfaces, and/or soil, comprising an effective amount of A. panicicola and at least one agent or microorganism for promoting plant growth and resistance to abiotic stresses, wherein the composition comprises alginate and is optionally used as a seed coating.
  • 2. The biofertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the composition contains A. panicicola and at least one Burkholderia species in equal concentrations.
  • 3. The biofertilizer composition of claim 2, comprising, a sun protecting product.
  • 4. The biofertilizer composition, according to claim 1, wherein said at least one microorganism is of the genus Barrenia.
  • 5. The biofertilizer of claim 4, wherein said at least one microorganism of the genus Barrenia is Barrenia panicia.
  • 6. The biofertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the composition contains A. panicicola and at least one Barrenia species in equal concentrations.
  • 7. The biofertilizer composition of claim 4, further comprising a sun protecting product and a polysaccharide solution.
  • 8. The biofertilizer composition of claim 7, wherein the polysaccharide is selected from the group consisting of guar gum, gelan gum, pectin, carboxymetil cellulose, agar, and xanthan gum and contains 1% w/v of a polysaccharide.
  • 9. The biofertilizer composition of claim 8 applied to seeds as a coating.
  • 10. The biofertilizer composition of claim 4, wherein said A. panicicolaand said microorganism of the genus Barrenia are encapsulated in alginate beads.
  • 11. The composition of claim 1, further comprising at least one of a gel formulation, agar, vermiculite, a sun protectant, rock phosphate, and a polysaccharide solution.
  • 12. A biofertilizer composition comprising an effective amount of A. panicicola, at least one agent or microorganism for promoting plant growth and resistance to abiotic stresses, and 1% w/v of a polysaccharide selected from the group consisting of guar gum, gelan gum, pectin, carboxymetil cellulose, agar, and xanthan gum.
  • 13. The composition of claim 12, wherein said at least one microorganism is a Burkholderia species.
  • 14. The composition of claim 12, wherein said at least one microorganism is a fungus of the genus Barrenia.
  • 15. The composition of claim 14, wherein the fungus is Barrenia panicia.
  • 16. A biofertilizer composition comprising an effective amount of A. panicicola and at least one agent or microorganism for promoting plant growth and resistance to abiotic stresses, wherein the composition is applied as a seed coating and improves seed germination.
  • 17. The composition of claim 16, wherein said at least one microorganism is a Burkholderia species.
  • 18. The composition of claim 16, wherein said at least one microorganism is a fungus of the genus Barrenia.
  • 19. The composition of claim 18, wherein the fungus is Barrenia panicia.
  • 20. A method for enhancing overall plant growth and resistance to adverse abiotic conditions comprising contacting a plant or seed therefrom with the composition of claim 12.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein said composition contains bacteria selected from the Burkholderia genus.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the crop plants are dicotyledonous plants or monocotyledonous plants.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein said plant is an edible plant selected from lettuce, corn, rice, soybeans, potatoes, barley, wheat, and carrots.
  • 24. The method of claim 20 wherein said plant is a turfgrass plant selected from a Ryegrass, Kentucky Bluegrass, Tall Fescue, Bermuda, St. Augustine or Zoysia plant or any other turfgrass plant.
  • 25. The method of claim 20, wherein said composition contains fungi selected from the Barrenia genus.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the fungi is Barrenia panicia.
  • 27. The method of claim 25, wherein said composition contains bacteria selected from the Burkholderia genus.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2015/048889, filed Sep. 8, 2015, which claims the benefit to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/047,226, filed Sep. 8, 2014. The entire disclosure of each of the aforesaid applications is incorporated by reference in the present application.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2015/048889 9/8/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/040285 3/17/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
20140342905 Bullis Nov 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 2013090628 Jun 2013 WO
WO 2013098829 Jul 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (36)
Entry
Walsh, Emily & Luo, Jing & Zhang, Ning. (2014). Acidomelania panicola gen. et. sp. nov. from switchgrass roots in acidic New Jersey Pine Barrens.. Mycologia. 106. 10.3852/13-377.
Walsh, Emily, Jing Luo, and Ning Zhang. “Acidonnelania panicicola gen. et sp. nov. from switchgrass roots in acidic New Jersey pine barrens.” Mycologia 106.4 (2014): 856-864.
Nailwal, Shweta, et al. “Burkholderia sp. from rhizosphere of Rhododendron arboretum: isolation, identification and plant growth promotory (PGP) activities.” Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6.2 (2014): 473-479.
Walsh, Emily, et al. “Barrenia, a new genus associated with roots of switchgrass and pine in the oligotrophic pine barrens.” Fungal biology 119.12 (2015): 1216-1225.
Blackwell M. 2011. The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 . . . 5.1 Million Species? Am J. Bot. 98:426-438.
Delaux PM, Sejalon-Delmas N, Becard G, Ane JM, 2013. Evolution of the plant-microbe symbiotic ‘toolkit’. Trends in Plant Science 18:298-304.
Digby S, Goos R, 1987. Morphology, development and taxonomy of Loramyces. Mycologia 79:821-831.
Dighton J, Tuininga AR, Gray DM, Huskins RE, Belton T, 2004. Impacts of atmospheric deposition on New Jersey pine barrens forest soils and communities of ectomycorrhizae. Forest Ecology and Management 201:131-144.
Edgar RC, 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792-1797.
Gensel, P.G., Kotyk, M.E., Basinger, J.F. 2001. Morphology of Above and Below Ground Structures in Earl Devonian (Pragian-Emsian) Plants, in: PG G D E (Eds), Plants Invade the Land: Evolutionary and Environmental Perspectives. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 83-102.
Grunig CR, Duo A, Sieber T, Holdenrieder O, 2008a. Assignment of species rank to six reproductively isolated cryptic species of the Phialocephala fortinii s.l.-Acephala applanata species complex. Mycologia 100:47-67.
Grunig CR, Queloz V, Sieber TN, Holdenrieder O, 2008b. Dark septate endophytes (DSE) of the Phialocephala fortinii s.l.—Acephala applanata species complex in tree roots: classification, population biology, and ecology. Botany 86:1355-1369.
Hall BD, Stiller JW, 1997. The origin of red algae: Implications for plastid evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:4520-4525.
Knapp DG, Pintye A, Kovacs GM, 2012. The dark side is not fastidious—dark septate endophytic fungi of native and invasive plants of semiarid sandy areas. PLoS ONE 7:e32570.
Luo J, Walsh E, Naik A, Zhuang W, Zhang K, Cai L, Zhang N, 2014a. Temperate pine barrens and tropical rain forests are both rich in undescribed fungi. PLoS ONE 9:e103753.
Luo J, Walsh E, Zhang N, 2014b. Four new species in Magnaporthaceae from grass roots in New Jersey Pine Barrens. Mycologia 106: 580-588.
Mandyam K, Fox C, Jumpponen A, 2012. Septate endophyte colonization and host responses of grasses and forbs native to a tallgrass prairie. Mycorrhiza 22:109-119.
Mandyam K, Jumpponen A, 2005. Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi. Studies in Mycology 53:173-189.
Mandyam K, Loughin T, Jumpponen A, 2010. Isolation and morphological and metabolic characterization of common endophytes in annually burned tallgrass prairie. Mycologia 102:813-821.
Matheny PL, Liu YJ, Ammirati JF, Hall, BD, 2002. Using Rpb1 Sequences to Improve Phylogenetic Inference Among Mushrooms (Inocybe, Agaricales). American Journal of Botany 89:688-698.
Mathew and Malathy RM, 2008, The evidence of mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes in roots of Chlorophytum borivillianum. Acta Botanica Croatica 67(1):91-96.
Menkis A, Allmer J, Vasiliauskas R, Lygis V, Stenlid J, Finlay R, 2004. Ecology and molecular characterization of dark septate fungi from roots, living stems, coarse and fine woody debris. Mycological Research 108:965-973.
Otgonsuren B, Lee MJ, 2013. Ectomycorrhiza Enhanced the Cold-Acclimation Growth and Freeze Tolerance of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 28:97-111.
Rehner SA, Samuels GJ, 1995. “Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales—a teleomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs.” Canadian Journal of Botany 73:S816-S823.
Stoyke, G, Currah, R.S.. 1991. Endophytic Fungi from the Mycorrhizae of Alpine Ericoid Plants. Can J. Bot. 69: 347-352.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S, 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:2725-2729.
Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbett DS, Fisher MC, 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31:21-32.
Tedrow JCF, 1952. Soil Conditions in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Bartonia 26: 28-35.
Tuininga, A.R., Dighton, J. 2004. Changes in Ectomycorrhizal Communities and Nutrient Availability Following Prescribed Burns in Two Upland Pine-Oak Forests in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Can J. Forest Res. 34: 1755-1765.
Walsh E, Luo J, Zhang N, 2014. Acidomelania panicicola gen. et sp. nov. from switchgrass roots in acidic New Jersey pine barrens. Mycologia 106:856-864.
Wang Z, Johnston PR, Takamatsu S, Spatafora JW, Hibbett DS, 2006. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Leotiomycetes based on rDNA data. Mycologia 98:1065-1075.
Weston WH, 1929. Observations on Loramyces, an undescribed aquatic ascomycete. Mycologia 21:55-76.
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J, 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. New York: Academic Press.
Yu T, Nassuth A, Peterson RL, 2001. Characterization of the interaction between the dark septate fungus Phialocephala fortinii and Asparagus officinalis roots. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 47:741-753.
Zijlstra J, Van't Hof P, Baar J, Verkley G, Summerbell R, Paradi I, Braakhekke W, Berendse F, 2005. Diversity of symbiotic root endophytes of the Helotiales in ericaceous plants and the grass, Dechampsia flexuosa. Studies in Mycology 53:147-162.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2015/048889, dated Dec. 14, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180037517 A1 Feb 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62047226 Sep 2014 US