Patent Grant
7918991
The present invention relates to NOx reduction compositions and the method of use thereof to reduce NOx emissions in refinery processes, and specifically in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) processes. More particularly, the present invention relates to NOx reduction compositions and the method of use thereof to reduce the content of NOx off gases released from a fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) regenerator during the FCC process without a substantial change in hydrocarbon conversion or the yield of valuable cracked products.
In recent years there has been an increased concern in the United States and elsewhere about air pollution from industrial emissions of noxious oxides of nitrogen, sulfur and carbon. In response to such concerns, government agencies have placed limits on allowable emissions of one or more of these pollutants, and the trend is clearly in the direction of increasingly stringent regulations.
NOx, or oxides of nitrogen, in flue gas streams exiting from fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) regenerators is a pervasive problem. Fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCUs) process heavy hydrocarbon feeds containing nitrogen compounds, a portion of which is contained in the coke on the catalyst as it enters the regenerator. Some of this coke-nitrogen is eventually converted into NOx emissions, either in the FCC regenerator or in a downstream CO boiler. Thus, all FCCUs processing nitrogen-containing feeds can have a NOx emissions problem due to catalyst regeneration.
In the FCC process, catalyst particles (inventory) are continuously circulated between a catalytic cracking zone and a catalyst regeneration zone. During regeneration, coke deposited on the cracking catalyst particles in the cracking zone is removed at elevated temperatures by oxidation with oxygen containing gases such as air. The removal of coke deposits restores the activity of the catalyst particles to the point where they can be reused in the cracking reaction. In general, when coke is burned with a deficiency of oxygen, the regenerator flue gas has a high CO/CO2 ratio and a low level of NOx, but when burned with excess oxygen, the flue gas has a high level of NOx and a reduced CO content. Thus, CO and NOx, or mixtures of these pollutants are emitted with the flue gas in varying quantities, depending on such factors as unit feed rate, nitrogen content of the feed, regenerator design, mode of operation of the regenerator, and composition of the catalyst inventory.
Various attempts have been made to limit the amount of NOx gases emitted from the FCCU by treating the NOx gases after their formation, e.g., post-treatment of NOx containing gas streams as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,434,147, 4,778,664, 4,735,927, 4,798,813, 4,855,115, 5,413,699, and 5,547,648.
Another approach has been to modify the operation of the regenerator to partial burn and then treat the NOx precursors in the flue gas before they are converted to NOx, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,173,278, 5,240,690, 5,372,706, 5,413,699, 5,705,053, 5,716,514, and 5,830,346.
Yet another approach has been to modify the operation of the regenerator to reduce NOx emissions, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,382,352, or modify the CO combustion promoter used, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,199,435, 4,812,430, and 4,812,431. Enrichment of air with oxygen in a regenerator operating in partial burn mode has also been suggested, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,804.
Additives have also been used in attempts to deal with NOx emissions. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,379,536, 6,280,607, 6,129,834 and 6,143,167 disclose the use of NOx removal compositions for reducing NOx emissions from the FCCU regenerator. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,165,933 and 6,358,881 also disclose a NOx reduction composition, which promotes CO combustion during the FCC catalyst regeneration process step while simultaneously reducing the level of NOx emitted during the regeneration step. NOx reduction compositions disclosed by these patents may be used as an additive which is circulated along with the FCC catalyst inventory or incorporated as an integral part of the FCC catalyst.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,973,399 and 4,980,052 disclose reducing emissions of NOx from the regenerator of the FCCU by incorporating into the circulating inventory of cracking catalyst separate additive particles containing a copper-loaded zeolite.
Many additive compositions heretofore used to control NOx emissions have typically caused a significant decrease in hydrocarbon conversion or the yield of valuable cracked products, e.g., gasoline, light olefins and liquefied petroleum gases (LPGs), while increasing the production of coke. It is a highly desirable characteristic for NOx additives added to the FCCU not to affect the cracked product yields or change the overall unit conversion. The operation of the FCCU is typically optimized based on the unit design, feed and catalyst to produce a slate of cracked products and maximize refinery profitability. This product slate is based on the value model of the specific refinery. For example, during the peak summer driving season many refiners want to maximize gasoline production, while during the winter season refiners may want to maximize heating oil production. In other cases a refinery may find it profitable to produce light olefins products that can be sold in the open market or used in an associated petrochemical plant as feedstocks.
When a NOx reduction additive increases coke production, the FCCU may have insufficient air capacity to burn the extra coke and may result in a lower feed throughput in the unit. If the additive increases the production of low value dry gas, the production of more valuable products may decrease. An increase in dry gas may exceed the ability of the unit to handle it, thus forcing a reduction of the amount of feed processed. While an additive that increases light olefins production may be desirable if the refinery values these products and the unit has the equipment necessary to process the extra light hydrocarbons, the additive may reduce profitability if the refinery's goal is to maximize gasoline production. Light olefins are typically made in the FCCU at the expense of gasoline production. Even an additive which increases unit conversion may be undesirable if it affects product yields, causes the unit to reach an equipment limitation, and/or decreases the amount of feed that can be processed.
Consequently, any change to the FCCU that affects the product slate or changes the ability to process feed at the desired rate can be detrimental to the refinery profitability. Therefore, there exists a need for NOx control compositions which do not significantly affect product yields and overall unit conversion.
It has now been discovered that certain metal-stabilized zeolites exhibit increased activity and stability to reduce NOx emissions during a catalytic cracking process. Incorporation of the metal-stabilized zeolite components with an inventory of a catalytic cracking catalyst, in particular a cracking catalyst inventory containing an active Y-type zeolite, being circulated throughout a fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) during a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process provides superior NOx control performance without substantially changing or affecting the hydrocarbon conversion or the yield of cracked petroleum products produced during the FCC process.
In accordance with the present invention, the NOx reduction compositions of the invention typically comprise a particulate composition containing particles of a zeolite component which has the ability to reduce NOx during an FCC process and which has been stabilized with a metal selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron and mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the particulate zeolite component is ferrierite. In a even more preferred embodiment of the invention, the zeolite particles are bound with an inorganic binder. The binder preferably comprises silica, alumina or silica-alumina. The zeolite may be exchanged with hydrogen, ammonium, alkali metal and combinations thereof. The preferred alkali metal is sodium, potassium or combinations thereof.
In one aspect of the invention, NOx reduction additive compositions based on a metal-stabilized zeolite are provided. The compositions are added to a circulating inventory of the catalytic cracking catalyst as a separate admixture of particles to reduce NOx emissions released from the FCCU regenerator during the FCC process.
In another aspect of the invention, NOx reduction catalyst compositions which comprise a metal-stabilized zeolite incorporated as an integral component of an FCC catalyst, preferably, containing a Y-type zeolite active cracking component, are provided.
In yet another aspect of the invention, improved NOx reduction compositions are provided which compositions reduce NOx emissions from the FCCU regenerator during the FCC process while substantially maintaining hydrocarbon conversion and the yield of cracked petroleum products and minimizing an increase in the production of coke.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide a process for the reduction of the content of NOx in the off gas of the FCCU regenerator during the FCC process using NOx reduction compositions in accordance with the present invention.
Another aspect of the invention is to provide improved FCC processes for the reduction of the content of NOx in the off gases of the FCCU regenerator without substantially affecting hydrocarbon conversion or the yield of petroleum products produced during the FCC process.
These and other aspects of the present invention are described in further detail below.
Although several nitrogen oxides are known which are relatively stable at ambient conditions, for purposes of the present invention, NOx will be used herein to represent nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide (the principal noxious oxides of nitrogen) as well as N2O4, N2O5 and mixtures thereof.
The present invention encompasses the discovery that the use of certain zeolite containing NOx reduction compositions in combination with a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst, preferably a catalyst comprising an active Y-type zeolite, is very effective for the reduction of NOx emissions released from the FCCU regenerator under FCC process conditions without a substantial change in hydrocarbon feed conversion or the yield of cracked products. Compositions of the invention generally comprise at least one metal stabilized zeolite component having the ability to reduce NOx emissions from the regenerator of a FCCU under FCC conditions. The zeolite is stabilized with a metal or (metal ion) selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron and mixtures thereof, to provide a NOx reducing zeolite. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the zeolite is bound with an inorganic binder to form a particulate NOx reduction composition. The particulate NOx reduction composition may be added to the circulating inventory of the catalytic cracking catalyst as a separate particle additive. In another embodiment of the invention, the zeolite is incorporated as an integral component of the cracking catalyst, wherein the zeolite is stabilized with the desired metal prior to or after incorporation in the cracking catalyst composition.
For purposes of the present invention, the phrase “a substantial change in hydrocarbon feed conversion or the yield of cracked products” is defined herein to mean in the alternative (i) less than a 30% relative change, preferably less than a 20% relative change and most preferably less than a 10% relative change in the yield of LCO (light cycle oils), bottoms and gasoline in combination with LPG as compared to the baseline yield of the same or substantially the same products; or (ii) less than a 10% relative change, preferably less than a 6.5% relative change and most preferably less than a 5% relative change in the hydrocarbon feed conversion as compared to the baseline conversion. The conversion is defined as 100% times (1−bottoms yield−LCO yield). When the NOx reduction composition is used as a separate additive, the baseline is the mean conversion or yield of a product in the FCCU, operating with the same or substantially the same feed and under the same or substantially the same reaction and unit conditions, but before the additive of the present invention is added to the catalyst inventory. When the NOx reduction composition is integrated or incorporated into the cracking catalyst particles to provide an integral NOx reduction catalyst system, a significant change in the hydrocarbon conversion or yield of cracked products is determined using a baseline defined as the mean conversion or yield of a product in the same or substantially the same FCCU operating with the same or substantially the same feed, under the same or substantially the same reaction and unit conditions, and with a cracking catalyst inventory comprising the same or substantially the same cracking catalyst composition as that containing the NOx reduction composition, except that the NOx reduction composition is replaced in the cracking catalyst with a matrix component such as kaolin or other filler. The percent changes specified above are derived from statistical analysis of operating data obtained from the Davison Circulating Riser (DCR) as described in the following publications: 1) G. W. Young, G. D. Weatherbee, and S. W. Davey, “Simulating Commercial FCCU yields with the Davison Circulating Riser (DCR) pilot plant unit,” National Petroleum Refiners Association (NPRA) Paper AM88-52; and 2) G. W. Young, “Realistic Assessment of FCC Catalyst Performance in the Laboratory,” in Fluid Catalytic Cracking: Science and Technology, J. S. Magee and M. M. Mitchell, Jr. Eds., Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Volume 76, p. 257, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam 1993, ISBN 0-444-89037-8.
Zeolites useful in the present invention include zeolites having that ability to reduce NOx emissions during a catalytic cracking process under catalytic cracking conditions, in particularly, during a FCC process under FCC conditions. In general, the NOx reducing zeolites include zeolites having a pore size ranging from about 2 to about 7.2 Angstroms with SiO2 to Al2O3 molar ratio of less than about 500, preferably less than 250, most preferably less than 100. Preferably, the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of ferrierite, ZSM-11, beta, MCM-49, mordenite, MCM-56, Zeolite-L, zeolite Rho, errionite, chabazite, clinoptilolite, MCM-22, MCM-35, MCM-61, Offretite, A, ZSM-12, ZSM-23, ZSM-18, ZSM-22, ZSM-57, ZSM-61, ZK-5, NaJ, Nu-87, Cit-1, SSZ-35, SSZ-48, SSZ-44, SSZ-23, Dachiardite, Merlinoite, Lovdarite, Levyne, Laumontite, Epistilbite, Gmelonite, Gismondine, Cancrinite, Brewsterite, Stilbite, Paulingite, Goosecreekite, Natrolite, omega or mixtures thereof. In a more preferred embodiment of the invention, the NOx reducing zeolite component is a zeolite selected from the group consisting of ferrierite, beta, MCM-49, mordenite, MCM-56, Zeolite-L, zeolite Rho, errionite, chabazite, clinoptilolite, MCM-22, Offretite, A, ZSM-12, ZSM-23, omega and mixtures thereof. In the most preferred embodiment of the invention, the zeolite is ferrierite.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the zeolite comprising the NOx reduction composition of the invention has a surface area of at least 100 m2/g, preferably at least 200 m2/g and most preferably at least 300 m2/g. In another embodiment of the invention, the zeolite is exchanged with a material selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, ammonium, alkali metal and combinations thereof, prior to incorporation into the binder to form a particulate NOx reduction composition, or FCC catalyst or stabilization with the metal or metal ion. The preferred alkali metal is one selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium and mixtures thereof.
The NOx reduction composition comprises at least one NOx reducing zeolite stabilized with a stabilizing amount, e.g., from about 1.0 to about 25 weight percent, preferably from about 5 to about 15 weight percent, most preferably from about 8 to about 12 weight percent, measured as the metal oxide, based on total weight of the NOx reduction composition, of a metal or metal ion selected from the group consisting of zinc, iron and mixtures thereof.
Typically, the stabilization of the zeolite is accomplished in any manner sufficient to deposit the desired stabilizing metal or metal ion in or on the zeolite component. It is preferred that the stabilizing metal or metal ion is deposited in such a manner such that the metal or metal ions reside in the pores of the zeolite or are incorporated within the framework of the zeolite. As will be understood by one skilled in the art, this may be accomplished by various methods.
The metal or metal ions may be incorporated within the framework of the zeolite by synthesizing the zeolite in the presence of the metal or metal ion. For example, the metal component may also be added to the synthesis gel during preparation of the zeolite. In the alternative, the metal or metal ion component may be added along with other reactants as a component used to synthesize the zeolite or partially substituted or exchanged for one of the other reactants, such as aluminum ion, used to synthesize the zeolite. The stabilizing metal or metal ion may also be incorporated into the pores of the zeolite using conventional methods such as, e.g. ion exchange, impregnation or the like, to form the NOx reduction composition of the invention.
A typical solid-state exchange may be accomplished by blending a finely ground metal salt with the zeolite and heating the two components together at a time and temperature sufficient to allow the exchange to occur. The blend may then be water-washed to remove any unexchanged metal ion and/or any remaining salt to provide the metal exchanged zeolite.
The stabilizing metal or metal ion component may also be impregnated or exchanged, typically by solution exchange, on a particulate NOx reduction composition formed by binding the NOx reducing zeolite with an inorganic binder to form particles. While the present invention is not limited to any particular process of preparation of the particulate composition, typically the particulate NOx reduction compositions of the invention are prepared by forming an aqueous slurry containing the NOx reducing zeolite, inorganic binder, and optional matrix materials, in an amount sufficient to provide at least 10.0 weight percent of NOx reducing zeolite component and at least 5.0 weight percent of binder material in the final composition and, thereafter, spray drying the aqueous slurry to form particles. The spray-dried particles are optionally dried at a sufficient temperature for a sufficient time to remove volatiles, e.g., at about 90° C. to about 320° C. for about 0.5 to about 24 hours. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the zeolite containing aqueous slurry is milled prior to spray-drying to reduce the mean particle size of materials contained in the slurry to 10 μm or less, preferably 5 μm or less, most preferably 3 μm or less. The aqueous slurry may be milled prior to or after incorporation of the binder and/or matrix materials as desired.
The spray-dried composition may be calcined at a temperature and for a time sufficient to remove volatiles and provide sufficient hardness to the binder for use in the FCCU under FCC process conditions, preferably from about 320° C. to about 900° C. from about 0.5 to about 6 hours.
Optionally, the dried or calcined composition is washed or exchanged with an aqueous solution of ammonia or ammonium salt (e.g., ammonium sulfate, nitrate, chloride, carbonate, phosphate and the like), or an inorganic or organic acid (e.g., sulfuric, nitric, phosphoric, hydrochloric, acetic, formic and the like) to reduce the amount of alkaline metals, e.g. sodium or potassium, in the finished product.
Impregnation of the particulate NOx reduction composition may typically be accomplished by dissolving a soluble metal salt in water and thereafter impregnating the particulate composition with the solution.
It is also within the scope of the present invention that the stabilizing metal or metal ion component may added to the feed slurry during preparation of the particulate NOx reduction composition. That is, the NOx reducing zeolite, binder and any matrix components may be combined with the stabilizing metal component to form the feed slurry followed by formation of a particulate composition, typically by spray drying as described hereinabove. It is further within the scope of the present invention that the stabilizing metal or metal ion component may be impregnated or exchanged, typically by solution exchange, on the NOx reducing zeolite prior to binding the NOx reducing zeolite particle with an inorganic binder to form the particulate NOx reduction composition as described herein above.
Where the NOx reduction composition is used as an integral component of the cracking catalyst, the stabilizing metal or metal ion may be exchanged or impregnated onto the NOx reducing zeolite before or after incorporation of the zeolite as a component of the catalyst. Without intending to limit the incorporation of the NOx reducing zeolite component within the cracking catalyst to any specific method of cracking catalyst manufacturing, typically, the zeolite component, any additional zeolites, the cracking catalyst zeolite, usually USY or REUSY-type, and any matrix materials are slurried in water. The slurry is milled to reduce the mean particle size of solids in the slurry to less than 10 μm, preferably to less than 5 μm, most preferably less than 3 μm. The milled slurry is combined with a suitable binder, i.e., a silica sol binder, and optional matrix material, e.g. clay. The slurry is then mixed and spray-dried to form a catalyst. The spray-dried catalyst is optionally washed using an aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide, an ammonium salt, an inorganic or organic acid, and water to remove the undesirable salts. The washed catalyst may be exchanged with a water soluble rare-earth salt, e.g., rare-earth chlorides, nitrates and the like.
Alternatively, the NOx reducing zeolite component, optional additional zeolites, the cracking catalyst zeolite, any matrix materials, a rare-earth water soluble salt, clay and alumina sol binder are slurried in water and blended. The slurry is milled and spray-dried. The spray-dried catalyst is calcined at about 250° C. to about 90° C. The spray-dried catalyst may then optionally be washed using an aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide, an ammonium salt, an inorganic or organic acid, and water to remove the undesirable salts. Optionally, the catalyst may be exchanged with a water-soluble rare-earth salt after it has been washed, by any of the methods known in the art. It is within the scope of the invention that the stabilizing metal component may be added to the catalyst feed slurry at any step before formation of the final catalyst composition.
Typically, the stabilizing metal or metal ion will be exchanged or impregnated on the NOx reducing zeolite or a final catalyst composition containing the NOx reducing zeolite using solution exchange, solid-state exchange or any other conventional methods. In a typical solution phase exchange, the zeolite is slurried up in an aqueous solution containing the desired metal component. The pH and temperature of the solution are controlled to maximize the exchange of the metal component on the zeolite. The material may then be filtered and water-washed to remove any unexchanged metal ion and/or any remaining salt. If the metal is added by impregnation, a soluble metal salt would be dissolved in water and the zeolite impregnated with the solution. Additionally, the exchange or impregnation may be carried out on a NOx reducing zeolite that contains alkali metal or alkaline earth metal ions or on a zeolite that has been converted to its hydrogen form.
The amount of NOx reducing zeolite used in the NOx reduction compositions of the invention will vary depending upon several factors, including but not limited to, the mode of combining the NOx reducing zeolite with the catalytic cracking catalyst and the type of cracking catalyst used. Where the compositions of the invention are separate additive compositions and comprise a particulate composition formed by binding particles of the NOx reducing zeolite with a suitable inorganic binder, generally the amount of the NOx reducing zeolite component present in the particulate compositions is at least 10, preferably at least 30, most preferably at least 40 and even more preferably at least 50, weight percent based on the total weight of the composition. Typically, the particulate additive composition contains from about 10 to about 85, preferably from about 30 to about 80, most preferably, from about 40 to about 75, weight percent of the NOx reducing zeolite component based on the total weight of the additive composition.
Binder materials useful to prepare the particulate NOx reduction compositions of the invention include any inorganic binder which is capable of binding a zeolite powder to form particles having properties suitable for use in the FCCU under FCC process conditions. Typical inorganic binder materials useful to prepare compositions in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to, alumina, silica, silica-alumina, aluminum phosphate and the like, and mixtures thereof. Preferably, the binder is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, silica-alumina and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the binder comprises alumina. Even more preferably, the binder comprises an acid or base peptized alumina. Most preferably, the binder comprises an alumina sol, e.g., aluminum chlorohydrol. Generally, the amount of binder material present in the particular additive compositions comprises from about 5 to about 50 weight percent, preferably from about 10 to about 30 weight percent, most preferably from about 15 to about 25 weight percent, of the additive composition of the invention.
Additional materials optionally present in the particulate compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, fillers (e.g., kaolin clay) or matrix materials (e.g., alumina, silica, silica-alumina, yttria, lanthana, ceria, neodymia, samaria, europia, gadolinia, titania, zirconia, praseodymia and mixtures thereof). When used, the additional materials are used in an amount which does not significantly adversely affect the performance of the compositions to reduce NOx emissions released from the FCCU regenerator under FCC conditions, the hydrocarbon feed conversion or the product yield of the cracking catalyst. In general the additional materials will comprise no more than about 70 weight percent of the compositions. It is preferred, however, that the compositions of the invention consist essentially of the NOx reducing zeolite and an inorganic binder.
Particulate additive compositions of the invention should have a particle size sufficient to permit the composition to be circulated throughout the FCCU simultaneously with the inventory of cracking catalyst during the FCC process. Typically the composition of the invention will have a mean particle size of greater than 45 μm. Preferably, the mean particle size is from about 50 to about 200 μm, most preferably from about 55 to about 150 μm, even more preferred from about 60 to about 120 μm. The compositions of the invention typically have a Davison attrition index (DI) value of less than about 50, preferably less than about 20, most preferably less than about 15.
Particulate compositions of the invention may be circulated in the form of separate particle additives along with the main cracking catalyst throughout the FCCU. Generally, the particulate additive composition is used in an amount of at least 0.1 weight percent of the FCC catalyst inventory. Preferably the amount of the additive composition used ranges from about 0.1 to about 80 weight percent, most preferably from about 1 to about 75 weight percent of the FCC catalyst inventory. Advantageously, when used in combination with specially formulated high activity cracking catalyst, e.g. the high activity cracking catalyst such as described and disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/833,603, filed Apr. 13, 2001, said document herein incorporated by reference, the use of additive levels as high as 80 weight percent of the FCC catalyst inventory allows for the effective reduction of NOx emissions from the FCCU regenerator without a loss of cracking activity due to dilution of the cracking catalyst inventory.
As will be understood by one skilled in the art, separate particulate compositions of the invention may be added to the FCCU in the conventional manner, e.g., with make-up catalyst to the regenerator or by any other convenient method.
When integrated into the FCC catalyst particles, the NOx reduction component typically represents at least 0.1 weight percent of the FCC catalyst particle. Preferably, the amount of the NOx reduction component used ranges from about 0.1 to about 70 weight percent, most preferably from about 1 to about 50 weight percent, of the FCC catalyst particles.
As stated herein above, the integrated FCC catalyst will typically comprise the NOx reducing zeolite component along with the cracking catalyst zeolite, inorganic binder materials and optionally, matrix, fillers, and other additive components such as metals traps (for example, traps for Ni and V) to make up the cracking catalyst. The cracking catalyst zeolite, usually a Y, USY or REUSY-type, provides the majority of the cracking activity and is typically present in a range from about 10 to about 75, preferably from about 15 to about 60 and most preferably from about 20 to about 50 weight percent based on the total weight of the composition. Inorganic binder materials useful to prepare integrated catalyst compositions in accordance with the present invention include any inorganic material capable of binding the components of the integrated catalyst to form particles having properties suitable for use in the FCCU under FCC process conditions. Typically, the inorganic binder materials include, but are not limited to, alumina, silica, silica-alumina, aluminum phosphate and the like, and mixtures thereof. Preferably, the binder is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, silica-alumina. Generally, the amount of binder material present in the integrated catalyst composition is less than 50 weight percent based on the total weight of the catalyst composition. Preferably, the inorganic binder materials is present in the integrated catalyst in an amount ranging from about 5 to about 45 weight percent, more preferably from about 10 to about 30 weight percent and most preferably from about 15 to about 25 weight percent, based on the total weight of the composition.
The matrix materials optionally present in the integrated catalyst compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to alumina, silica-alumina, rare earth oxides such as lanthana, transition metal oxides such as titania, zirconia, and manganese oxide, group 2A oxides such as magnesium and barium oxides, clays such as kaolin, and mixtures thereof. The matrix and/or fillers are typically present in the integral catalyst in an amount of less than 50 weight percent based on the total weight of the catalyst composition. Preferably, the matrix and/or fillers are present in an amount ranging from about 1 to about 45 weight percent based on the total weight of the catalyst composition.
The particle size and attrition properties of the integral catalyst affect fluidization properties in the unit and determine how well the catalyst is retained in the commercial FCC unit. The integral catalyst composition of the invention typically has a mean particle size of about 45 to about 200 μm, more preferably from about 50 μm to about 150 μm. The attrition properties of the integral catalyst, as measured by the Davison Attrition Index (DI), have a DI value of less than 50, more preferably less than 20 and most preferably less than 15.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the FCC cracking catalyst contains a Y-type zeolite. The NOx reducing zeolite may be added as a separate additive particle to a circulating inventory of the cracking catalyst or incorporated directly into the Y-type zeolite containing cracking catalyst as an integral component of the catalyst. In either case, the Y-type zeolite is present in an amount sufficient to provide adequate cracking activity in the FCCU, as will be readily determined by one skilled in the art. Preferably, the Y-type zeolite is present in an amount sufficient to provide a ratio of NOx reducing zeolite to Y-type zeolite of less than 2, preferably less than 1, in the total catalyst inventory.
Somewhat briefly, the FCC process involves the cracking of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks to lighter products by contact of the feedstock in a cyclic catalyst recirculation cracking process with a circulating fluidizable cracking catalyst inventory consisting of particles having a mean size ranging from about 50 to about 150 μm, preferably from about 60 to about 120 μm. The catalytic cracking of these relatively high molecular weight hydrocarbon feedstocks results in the production of a hydrocarbon product of lower molecular weight. The significant steps in the cyclic FCC process are:
Conventional FCC catalysts include, for example, zeolite based catalysts with a faujasite cracking component as described in the seminal review by Venuto and Habib, Fluid Catalytic Cracking with Zeolite Catalysts, Marcel Dekker, New York 1979, ISBN 0-8247-6870-1, as well as in numerous other sources such as Sadeghbeigi, Fluid Catalytic Cracking Handbook, Gulf Publ. Co. Houston, 1995, ISBN 0-88415-290-1. Preferably, the FCC catalyst is a catalyst comprising a Y-type zeolite active cracking component. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the FCC catalysts consist of a binder, usually silica, alumina, or silica-alumina, a Y-type zeolite active component, one or more matrix aluminas and/or silica-aluminas, and fillers such as kaolin clay. The Y-type zeolite may be present in one or more forms and may have been ultra stabilized and/or treated with stabilizing cations such as any of the rare-earths.
Typical FCC processes are conducted at reaction temperatures of 480° C. to 600° C. with catalyst regeneration temperatures of 600° C. to 800° C. As it is well known in the art, the catalyst regeneration zone may consist of a single or multiple reactor vessels. The compositions of the invention may be used in FCC processing of any typical hydrocarbon feedstock. Suitable feedstocks include petroleum distillates or residuals of crude oils having a boiling point range of about 150° C. to about 900° C., preferably, about 200° C. to about 800° C., which when catalytically cracked provide a gasoline or other petroleum product. Synthetic feeds having boiling points of about 200° C. to about 800° C., such as oil from coal, tar sands or shale oil, can also be included.
In order to remove coke from the catalyst, oxygen or air is added to the regeneration zone. This is performed by a suitable sparging device in the bottom of the regeneration zone, or if desired, additional oxygen is added to the dilute or dense phase of the regeneration zone.
Additive compositions in accordance with the invention dramatically reduce, i.e., by at least 10%, preferably, at least 20%, the emissions of NOx in the FCCU regenerator effluent during the catalyst regeneration, while substantially maintaining the hydrocarbon feed conversion or the yield of cracked products, e.g., gasoline and light olefins, obtained from the cracking catalyst. In some cases, NOx reduction of 70% or greater is readily achievable using the compositions and method of the invention without significantly affecting the cracked products yields or feed conversion. However, as will be understood by one skilled in the FCC art, the extent of NOx reduction will depend on such factors as, for example, the composition and amount of the additive utilized; the design and the manner in which the catalytic cracking unit is operated, including but not limited to oxygen level and distribution of air in the regenerator, catalyst bed depth in the regenerator, stripper operation and regenerator temperature, the properties of the hydrocarbon feedstock cracked, and the presence of other catalytic additives that may affect the chemistry and operation of the regenerator. Thus, since each FCCU is different in some or all of these respects, the effectiveness of the process of the invention may be expected to vary from unit to unit. NOx reduction compositions of the invention also prevent a significant increase in the production of coke during the FCC process.
It is also within the scope of the invention that NOx reduction compositions of the invention may be used alone or in combination with one or more additional NOx reduction component to achieve NOx reduction more efficiently than the use of either of the compositions alone. Preferably, the additional NOx reduction component is a non-zeolitic material, that is, a material that contains no or substantially no (i.e., less than 5 weight percent, preferably less than 1 weight percent) zeolite.
It is also contemplated within the scope of the present invention that additive compositions in accordance with the present invention may be used in combination with other additives conventionally used in the FCC process, e.g., SOx reduction additives, gasoline-sulfur reduction additives, CO combustion promoters, additives for the production of light olefins, and the like.
The scope of the invention is not in any way intended to be limited by the examples set forth below. The examples include the preparation of additives useful in the process of the invention and the evaluation of the invention process to reduce NOx in a catalytic cracking environment. The examples are given as specific illustrations of the claimed invention. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific details set forth in the examples.
All parts and percentages in the examples, as well as the remainder of the specification which refers to solid compositions or concentrations, are by weight unless otherwise specified. Concentrations of gaseous mixtures are by volume unless otherwise specified.
Further, any range of numbers recited in the specification or claims, such as that representing a particular set of properties, units of measure, conditions, physical states or percentages, is intended to literally incorporate expressly herein by reference or otherwise, any number falling within such range, including any subset of numbers within any range so recited.
The performance evaluation of Additives A through H for the reduction of NO emissions from an FCC unit was conducted by using the DCR. In each of the experiments, the DCR was operated under “full burn” regeneration conditions, where “full burn” is defined as the condition wherein the amount of air added to the regenerator is sufficient to convert all the coke species on the spent FCC catalyst to CO2 before leaving the regenerator. The testing was performed with 1% excess O2 in the regenerator, and with the regenerator operating at 705° C.
A composition comprising 75% ferrierite and 25% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 25% Al2O3 from aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 75% ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O=6-10 wt %), and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 42-44% solids. The slurry was milled to an average particle size of less than 3.0 μm and then spray dried. The spray-dried product was calcined for 20 to 40 minutes at 400 to 450° C. The calcined catalyst was washed with an ammonium sulfate solution, followed by water, to decrease the K2O level to less than 1.0 wt %. The catalyst was designated as Additive A, the properties of which are shown in Table 1 below.
A composition comprising 73% ferrierite, 2.5% ZnO and 24.5% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 250 g of ZnCl2 and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive B, the properties of which are shown in Table 1 below.
A composition comprising 72.1% ferrierite, 3.9% ZnO and 24% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K20<0.5 wt %), 400 g of ZnCl2 and enough additional water to male a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. This catalyst was designated as Additive C, the properties of which are shown in Table 1 below.
A composition comprising 70.7% ferrierite, 5.8% ZnO and 23.5% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows. An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 600 g of ZnCl2 and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive D, the properties of which are shown in Table 1 below.
A composition comprising 69.5% ferrierite, 7.4% ZnO and 23.1% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 800 g of ZnCl2 and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive E, the properties of which are shown in Table 1 below.
A composition comprising 67% ferrierite, 10.7% ZnO and 22.3% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 1200 g of ZnCl2 and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive F, the properties of which are shown in Table 1 below.
An Additive G was prepared as follows: A sample of 732.2 gms dry basis of Additive D, prepared as shown in Example 4, was impregnated with a solution prepared with 172.9 g Zn (Acetate)2.2H2O, 281 ml H2O and 209.4 ml of a 30% NH4OH solution. It was oven dried for 4 hours at 287° C., reimpregnated with a solution of the same composition, and dried for 4 hours at 287° C. The sample was then calcined for 2 hours at 593° C. Additive G had the properties as shown in Table 1 below.
A composition comprising 62.5% ferrierite, 10.7% ZnO, 4.5% Catapal C alumina and 22.3% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4200 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 300 g (dry basis) Catapal C alumina, 1200 g of ZnCl2 and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst is designated as Additive H, the properties of which are shown in Table 2 below.
A composition comprising 65% ferrierite, 15% Clay and 20% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 4344 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 3250 g (dry basis) of ferrierite, 650 g (dry basis) clay and enough additional water to make a slurry which contained about 40% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst, with the properties as shown in Table 2, was designated as Additive I.
Ferrierite was exchanged with zinc ions using a solid-state exchange procedure as follows: Zinc chloride (228 g) was ground into a fine powder and then blended with 2500 g of ferrierite powder. The blend was calcined for 2 hours at 325° C. The calcined blend was slurried into 9000 g of water maintained at 80° C., mixed for 0.16 hours and then filtered. The filter cake was then washed three times with water maintained at 80° C., dried and then calcined at 593° C. for 1.5 hours. The final zinc solid-state exchanged product contained 2.80% ZnO.
A composition comprising 65% Zn/ferrierite, 15% Clay and 20% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 2608 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 1950 g (dry basis) of zinc solid state exchanged ferrierite and enough additional water to make a slurry which contained about 40% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive J and had the properties shown in Table 2 below.
A Ferrierite catalyst bound with silica sol was prepared using the following procedure: An aqueous slurry containing 29% Ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20) was milled in a Drais mill. The milled Ferrierite slurry (4160 g) was combined with 1200 g Natka clay (dry basis) and 6000 g silica sol binder (10% solids). The silica sol binder was prepared from sodium silicate and acid alum. The catalyst slurry was then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The resulting spray dried product was washed with ammonium sulfate solution, followed by water to give a catalyst with a Na2O level of less than 0.1 wt %. The catalyst was designated as Additive K and had the properties as shown in Table 2 below.
Additive K, prepared in Example 11, was exchanged with zinc ions by the following process: The Zn-exchange was carried out by adding 150 g of the spray dried catalyst to a zinc nitrate solution containing 12.4 g of Zn(NO3)2.6H2O in 1500 g water. The mixture was stirred for 0.5 hours at 70° C. The slurry was then filtered and the catalyst washed three times with water maintained at 70° C. to remove the excess zinc nitrate. The catalyst was designated as Additive L and had the properties as shown in Table 2 below.
Additives A through H were evaluated in the DCR to determine the effectiveness of the additives for the reduction of NO emissions released from an FCC unit. In each of the experiments, the DCR was operated under “full burn” regeneration conditions, where “full burn” is defined as the condition wherein the amount of air added to the regenerator is sufficient to convert all the coke species on the spent FCC catalyst to CO2. The testing was performed with 1% excess O2 in the regenerator, and with the regenerator operating at 705° C.
A commercial FCC feed having the properties as shown in Table 3 below was used for testing. The DCR was charged initially with a blend of approximately 1596 g of an equilibrium cracking catalyst having the properties as shown in Table 4 and 4 g of a commercial sample of a Pt-based combustion promoter (CP®-3, obtained from Grace Davison), which had been deactivated for 20 hours at 788° C. without any added Ni or V using the Cyclic Propylene Steaming method (CPS). The description of the CPS method has been published in L. T. Boock, T. F. Petti, and J. A Rudesill, “Contaminant-Metal Deactivation and Metal-Dehydrogenation Effects During Cyclic Propylene Steaming of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Catalysts,” Deactivation and Testing of Hydrocarbon Processing Catalysts, ACS Symposium Series 634, p. 171 (1996), ISBN 0-8412-3411-6.
After stabilization of the unit, the baseline NO emissions data were collected using an on-line Multigas 2030 FTIR gas analyzer. Subsequently a second blend containing the additive was injected into the DCR. For Additives A, E, F, G and H, this blend contained approximately 86 g of the additive that had been hydrothermally deactivated in a fluidized bed reactor with 20% steam in N2 for 24 hours at 760° C. without the addition of Ni or V and 0.215 g of the CPS-deactivated CP®-3. For Additives B, C and D, this blend contained approximately 90 g of the additive that had been hydrothermally deactivated in a fluidized bed reactor with 20% steam in N2 for 24 hours at 760° C. without the addition of Ni or V, 109.5 g of the equilibrium cracking catalyst and 0.25 g of the CPS-deactivated CP®-3. As observed in Table 5, Additives B through H show better NOx reduction performance in the DCR than Additive A at similar amounts. This confirms that the addition of Zn to ferrierite improves its NOx reduction performance after deactivation. The NOx reduction performance increases with increasing Zn levels until a maximum is reached in the 10% ZnO range.
The yields for the runs with Additives A, E and F are shown in Table 6 below to illustrate the point that none of these NOx reduction additives affect FCC yields.
Additives I and J were evaluated for the reduction of NOx emissions from an FCC unit in the DCR. The testing was performed with the DCR operating under the same conditions, equilibrium catalyst and feed as in Example 13. The DCR was charged initially with a blend of approximately 1895.25 g of the equilibrium cracking catalyst and 4.75 g of CPS-deactivated CP®-3. After stabilization of the unit, the baseline NO emissions data were collected using an on-line Multigas 2030 FTIR gas analyzer. Subsequently a blend of approximately 105 g of Additive I or J, 94.5 g of the equilibrium catalyst and 0.5 g of the CPS-deactivated CP®-3 was injected into the DCR and the run was continued for approximately 10 hours on the additive. As shown in Table 7, Additive J was only slightly more effective in reducing NOx emissions than Additive I after 1 hour but shows a bigger NOx reduction performance advantage after 7 hours. From this data, it can be concluded that the addition of pre-exchanged Zn to ferrierite stabilizes the NOx reduction activity and provides improved NOx reduction performance as compared to the non stabilized additive.
Additives K and L were evaluated for their NOx reduction performance in the DCR using the same operating conditions as in Examples 13 and 14. A commercial FCC feed was used for testing and its properties are shown in Table 8 below. The DCR was charged initially with a blend of approximately 1800 g of a commercially available cracking catalyst, SUPERNOVA® DMR+ obtained from Grace Davison hydrothermally deactivated in a fluidized bed reactor with 100% steam for 4 hours at 816° C. without the addition of Ni or V. After stabilization of the unit, the baseline NO emissions data were collected using an on-line Lear-Siegler SO2/NO Analyzer (SM8100A). Subsequently, a blend of 100 g of catalyst was added to the DCR consisting of 95.25 g of the hydrothermally deactivated SuperNova® DMR+ catalyst and 4.75 g of the CPS-CP®-3. NO emissions were continuously collected through out this time frame and once the unit was again stabilized, a blend containing 0.525 g of the deactivated CP-3® with 105 g of Additive K or L and 105 g of the deactivated SuperNova® DMR+ catalyst was added to the DCR. As observed in Table 9, Additive L is better at reducing NO emissions from the DCR than the Additive K. This shows that post-exchange of Zn onto ferrierite contained in a particle with a silica sol binder improves the NO reduction performance of ferrierite.
A composition comprising 75% clay and 25% alumina sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared that contained 2174 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 1500 g (dry basis) of clay and enough additional water to make a slurry which contained about 40% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive M and had the properties as shown in Table 10 below.
A composition comprising 71% clay, 6% ZnO and 23% alumina sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared that contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of clay, 620 g ZnCl2 and enough additional water to make a slurry which contained about 45% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive N amd had the properties as shown in Table 10 below.
ZnO supported on alumina was prepared as follows: 1000 g (dry basis) of HiQ alumina (obtained from Alcoa) was impregnated, to incipient wetness, with 165 g ZnCl2 dissolved in water. The material was then calcined for 2 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated Additive O and had the properties as shown in Table 10 below.
In order to simulate the pick-up of SiO2 and sodium ions of the ZnO/alumina catalyst during deactivation in an FCC unit, the catalyst was impregnated first with a SiO2 compound and then with sodium salt. 500 g (dry basis) Additive O was impregnated, to incipient wetness, with 85 g tetraethylorthosilicate dissolved in ethanol. The catalyst was dried at room temperature overnight and then impregnated with an aqueous solution containing 4.3 g of sodium carbonate. The material was then calcined for 2 hours at 593° C. Subsequently, this sample was subjected to hydrothermal deactivation in a fluidized bed reactor for 4 hours at 816° C. with 100% steam. The catalyst was designated Additive P and had the properties as shown in Table 10 below.
The performance of HiQ Al2O3 and Additives M through P for reduction of NO emissions were evaluated in the DCR using the same conditions, feed and catalyst as shown in Examples 13 and 14. The DCR was initially charged with a blend of 1596 g of the equilibrium cracking catalyst and 4 g of CPS-deactivated CP®-3. Upon stabilization of the unit, a blend of 85.12 g of the additive and 0.215 g of deactivated CP®-3 was charged to the DCR and the run was continued for approximately 2 hours on each additive. Results were recorded in Table 11 below.
As shown in Table 11, it can be inferred that addition of ZnO to different supports does not improve their NOx reduction activity in the DCR, meaning that the intrinsic NOx reduction activity of Zn is very low under realistic FCC conditions. This data shows that the increased NOx reduction activity observed with the addition of Zn to ferrierite in Examples 13 and 14 is primarily due to the stabilizing effect of Zn on ferrierite.
A composition comprising 75% ferrierite, 25% Alumina sol was prepared as described in Example 1. The spray dried product was calcined 1.5 hours at 593° C. About 125 g of this material was subsequently impregnated with 17.7 g of YCl3.6H2O dissolved in 100 ml deionized water, oven dried at 287° C. overnight and then calcined for 2 hours at 538° C. The resulting sample was designated as Additive Q and had the properties as shown in Table 12 below.
A composition comprising 75% Ferrierite, 25% Alumina sol was prepared as described in Example 1. The spray dried product was calcined 1.5 hours at 593° C. About 125 g of this material was subsequently impregnated with 33.2 g of MgCl2.6H2O dissolved in 87 ml deionized water; oven dried at 287° C. overnight, and then calcined for 2 hours at 593° C. The resulting sample was designated as Additive R and had the properties as shown in Table 12 below.
A composition comprising 73% ferrierite, 3% Fe2O3 and 24% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 445 g of FeCl2.4H2O and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive S and had the properties as shown in Table 12 below.
A composition comprising 67% ferrierite, 11% Fe2O3 and 22% Alumina Sol was prepared as follows: An aqueous slurry was prepared which contained 6520 g of aluminum chlorohydrol solution (23% solids), 4500 g (dry basis) of ferrierite (SiO2/Al2O3=20, Na2O+K2O<0.5 wt %), 1782 g of FeCl2.4H2O and enough additional water to make a slurry that contained about 44% solids. The slurry was milled in a Drais mill to an average particle size of less than 2.5 μm and then spray dried in a Bowen spray dryer. The spray-dried product was calcined for 1.5 hours at 593° C. The catalyst was designated as Additive T and had the properties as shown in Table 12 below.
The performance of Additives Q through T was evaluated for the reduction of NO emissions in the DCR using the same conditions, feed and catalyst as shown in Example 13. The DCR was initially charged with a blend of 1596 g of the equilibrium cracking catalyst, and 4 g of CPS-deactivated CP®-3. Upon stabilization of the unit, a blend of 85.12 g of Additive Q or R or S that had been hydrothermally deactivated in a fluidized bed reactor with 20% steam in N2 for 24 hours at 760° C. without the addition of Ni or V, and 0.215 g of deactivated CP-3® was charged to the DCR and the run was continued for approximately 2 h on each on additive. For the evaluation of Additive T, the second blend contained 85 g of the hydrothermally deactivated additive, 14.75 g of the equilibrium catalyst and 0.25 g of deactivated CP-3®. As can be inferred from Table 13, at constant moles of the stabilizing metal, Zn and Fe exhibited similar NOx reduction performance on ferrierite and showed improved NOx reduction performance over either Mg or Y in stabilized ferrierite.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/909,706, filed Aug. 2, 2004 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/909,709, filed Aug. 2, 2004, now abandoned. This application is a 35 USC 371 filing of PCT International Application No. PCT/US2006/010843, filed on Mar. 24, 2006, which claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No, 60/635,150 filed on Apr. 27, 2005. This application also claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/675,150 filed on Apr. 27, 2005, under Title 35, United States Code, §119(e).
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2006/010843 | 3/24/2006 | WO | 00 | 10/8/2007 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2006/115665 | 11/2/2006 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2892801 | Sargent | Jun 1959 | A |
| 3036973 | Nathan et al. | May 1962 | A |
| 3129252 | Graham et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3184417 | Hort | May 1965 | A |
| 3364136 | Chen et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3617488 | Csicsery | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3634140 | Krusenstierna | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3804780 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3894940 | Scherzer et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 4170571 | Ritscher | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4199435 | Chessmore et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4290878 | Blanton, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4309279 | Chester et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4368057 | Matthews | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4377502 | Klotz | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4427536 | Klaassen et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4428827 | Hobbs et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4434147 | Dimpfl et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4469589 | Yoo et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4471070 | Siefert et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4472267 | Yoo et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4472532 | Mooi | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4473658 | Schwartz | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476245 | Siefert | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4495304 | Yoo et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4495305 | Yoo et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4513091 | Chang et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4521298 | Rosinski et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4522937 | Yoo et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4582815 | Bowes | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4642178 | Yoo et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4654316 | Barri et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4708786 | Occelli | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4728635 | Bhattacharyya | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4735927 | Gerdes | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4744962 | Johnson et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4747935 | Scherzer | May 1988 | A |
| 4755282 | Samish et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4758418 | Yoo et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4778664 | Grinstead | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778665 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4790982 | Yoo et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4797266 | Evans | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4798813 | Kato | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4810369 | Scherzer | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812430 | Child | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812431 | Child | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4818509 | Dwyer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4826799 | Cheng et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4830840 | Bhattacharyya | May 1989 | A |
| 4839026 | Brown et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4853203 | Guth et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4855115 | Imanari | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4880521 | Scherzer | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889615 | Chin et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4895994 | Cheng et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4898846 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4904627 | Bhattacharyya | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4923842 | Summers | May 1990 | A |
| 4946581 | van Broekhoven | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4952382 | van Broekhoven | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957718 | Yoo et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4957892 | Yoo et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4963520 | Yoo et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4973399 | Green et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4976847 | Maxwell et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4980052 | Green et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4986897 | Chin | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4988432 | Chin | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4988654 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5002653 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5002654 | Chin | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5015362 | Chin | May 1991 | A |
| 5017538 | Takeshima | May 1991 | A |
| 5021144 | Altrichter | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5037538 | Chin et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5041272 | Tamura et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5057205 | Chin | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5069776 | Biswas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5102530 | Edwards et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5114691 | Pinnavaia et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5114898 | Pinnavaia et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5130012 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5145815 | Zarchy | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5171553 | Li et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173278 | Marler | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5174980 | Hellring et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5190736 | Hellring et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5206196 | Nakano et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5208198 | Nakano et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5240690 | Tang | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5260043 | Li | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5260240 | Guthrie et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5268089 | Avidan et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5270024 | Kasahara | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5286693 | Ino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5294332 | Klotz | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5320822 | Ozin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5364517 | Dieckmann et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371055 | Cormier et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372706 | Buchanan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5374409 | Kasahara | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5374410 | Grasselli et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5382352 | Hansen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5413699 | Chou | May 1995 | A |
| 5413977 | Occelli | May 1995 | A |
| 5422333 | Kano et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5427989 | Kanesaka | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5433933 | Eshita et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5443803 | Mizuno | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5472677 | Farris et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5503818 | Nicolaides et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510306 | Murray | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5543125 | Uchida | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5547648 | Buchanan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552129 | Farnos et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5565181 | Dieckmann et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5589147 | Farnos et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5599520 | Garces et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5614453 | Occelli | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5627125 | Ebner et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5695728 | Miura | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5705053 | Buchanan | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716514 | Buchanan | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5741468 | Saito | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744113 | Hums | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744686 | Gajda | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5750020 | Bhattacharyya et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5785947 | Zones et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5807528 | Nakano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5827793 | Hu | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830346 | Harandi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5879645 | Park | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5908804 | Menon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5908806 | Kharas | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917069 | Buckl | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5955046 | Okimura et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958818 | Demmel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5985225 | Ohtsuka | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993642 | Mohr et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6017508 | Millar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6027696 | Das et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033641 | Hall et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040259 | Mohr | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6090271 | Carpency | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6103208 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103949 | Demmel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106697 | Swan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110258 | Fraenkel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114265 | Steffens et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6129834 | Peters et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143167 | Peters et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6143261 | Lissy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6143681 | Sachtler et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165933 | Peters et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6190538 | Gosselink et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6214211 | Itoh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6280607 | Peters et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284703 | Ostgard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6309758 | Schmidt | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6358881 | Peters et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6376708 | Morgenstern et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379536 | Peters et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380119 | Grosch et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6395403 | Schmidt | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6413898 | Faber et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6471924 | Feeley | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6479421 | Vierheilig | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6514470 | Ott et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6528031 | Park et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538169 | Pittman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6558533 | Schmidt et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6660683 | Yaluris et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6677263 | Wang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6884744 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7304011 | Yaluris et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 20010002426 | Mohr et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016184 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013228 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016259 | Yoshikawa | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022573 | Tanada et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022574 | Tanada et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037808 | Ostgard et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038051 | Ostgard et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020039550 | Sindlinger et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049132 | Jan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061813 | Wang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082159 | Grosch et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082460 | Verduijn et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094314 | Miyadera et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094932 | Faber et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120169 | Spagnol et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020139112 | Onodera et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160905 | Loyalka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183191 | Faber et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187098 | Pinnavaia et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020189973 | Henry et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020192155 | Sterte et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030019794 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040425 | Huang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044330 | Andorf et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073566 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030098259 | Kelkar et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115859 | Deeba | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165415 | Ott et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166453 | Kuvettu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181324 | Hotta | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040031727 | O'Conner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072675 | Kelkar et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086442 | Vierheilig | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040262197 | McGregor et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050100494 | Yaluris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232839 | Yaluris et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0355928 | Feb 1990 | EP |
| 03045547 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 03046112 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2004014793 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2005005578 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| 2005047429 | May 2005 | WO |
| 2005099898 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090057199 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60635150 | Apr 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10909706 | Aug 2004 | US |
| Child | 11918086 | US | |
| Parent | 10909709 | Aug 2004 | US |
| Child | 10909706 | US |
