COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

Abstract
According to the present invention there is provided a composition for treating plants seeds and soils for improvement of soil microbiology populations to facilitate enhanced plant growth wherein the composition comprises at least one bioflavonoid and at least one organic acid. Preferably, the composition includes at least one wetting agent. More preferably, the at least one wetting agent is a natural plant extract. The at least one bioflavonoid may be a natural plant extract. Further, the organic acid may be a naturally produced organic acid.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to compositions for improvement of agricultural production and more particularly relates to compositions for enhancing increasing soil health including increasing soil microbial populations.


BACKGROUND

With an ever increasing population and stresses of climate change, there is pressure to increase agricultural production for purposes including food, animal fodder and fuel.


Traditional agricultural treatments such as tilling, harrowing, applying pesticides, herbicides or nutrients such as fertilizers have been responsible for a worldwide degradation of soil quality. Pesticides, herbicides or nutrients such as fertilizers have also been found to have undesirable side-effects on those ingesting them. Thus, there is also pressure to seek less harmful alternatives from consumers due to the growing public awareness of the effects of prolonged exposure or use of chemicals.


Further, synthetic chemicals such as fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers can have a negative effect on soil microbial population which reduce plant crop productivity. These chemicals also chelate (bind up) soil nutrients so they are not accessible by the plant. Only soil biology can release them. Without diverse soil biology there is a high vulnerability for the plants to disease pressure. Also soil biology is responsible for carbon holding capacity in the soil which directly correlates to water holding capacity.


The traditional agricultural treatments, together with other farming methods such as tilling and environment stress from climate change due to environment extremes, have been found to cause stress on the soils which consequently also reduce agricultural production.


Stressed soils can also be slow to regenerate naturally. This regeneration process can sometimes taking years as each season only provides a short window of opportunity to allow soil to recover.


Examples of the invention seek to solve or at least ameliorate one or more disadvantages of previous agricultural practices including reduce or eliminate use of harmful traditional agricultural treatments or reduce costs of agricultural production, as well as to desirably improve increase plant production including crop plants by enhancing soil health condition.


The above references to and descriptions of prior proposals or products are not intended to be, and are not to be construed as, statements or admissions of common general knowledge in the art. In particular, the above prior art discussion does not relate to what is commonly or well known by the person skilled in the art, but assists in the understanding of the inventive step of the present invention of which the identification of pertinent prior art proposals is but one part.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention there is provided a composition for treating plants seeds and soils for improvement of soil microbiology populations to facilitate enhanced plant growth wherein the composition comprises at least one bioflavonoid and at least one organic acid.


Preferably, the composition includes at least one wetting agent. More preferably, the at least one wetting agent is a natural plant extract.


The at least one bioflavonoid may be a natural plant extract. Further, the organic acid may be a naturally produced organic acid.


Preferably, the composition is in the form of a liquid. The composition may comprise 0.25 to 4 ml in a topical composition per litre of water or other diluting agent. More preferably, the topical composition is suitable for application to plant foliar. Alternatively, the topical composition is suitable for application as an irrigation additive. The irrigation addictive could be delivered by a drip system or other irrigation method. The composition may also comprise a direct soil additive when combined with a soil biological food source.


In a most preferred embodiment, the composition comprises:

    • between 10% to 20% (by weight) at least one bioflavonoid; or
    • between 30% to 60% (by weight) at least one organic acid; and/or
    • between 10% to 20% (by weight) at least one wetting agent.


The at least one bioflavonoid may be selected from the group including: citrus fruit plant extracts, including grapefruit, lemon, lime, pomelo, orange, tangerine, bitter orange extract.


The at least one organic acid may be selected from the group including: malic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, salicylic acid, caprylic acid, Silicic acid, Ascorbic acid and tartaric acid.


The at least one wetting agent may be selected from the group including: Saponins, glycerine.


The composition may include plant foliar or irrigation treatments including at least one of plant growth regulators, bactericides or fungicides.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Preferred embodiments of the present invention are directed to compositions for the general improvement of agricultural production including enhancing soil health condition and/or increasing beneficial soil microbial populations. The compositions preferably comprises at least one bioflavonoid in combination with at least one organic acid. The compositions may also include at least one wetting agent. Specifically the applicant has found that the soil microbial populations are improved by use of these compositions according to the present invention effecting a natural symbiotic relationship between the plant and soil thereby improving plant yield and growth.


The applicant considers that the treatment of the composition on the foliar of the plant provides the advantage of stimulating production of bioflavonoids and other plant compounds which are needed for the process of secondary metabolism in plants where the plants are not able to adequately produce these compounds due to the effects of abiotic or biotic stress condition. In addition, the application has found that the treatment of plants and roots with the composition improves plant processes centred around bioflavonoid production in the plant. The follow-on effect of this is an improvement in the plants relationship with soil microbiology resulting in a rise in the population of microbes around the roots of the plant.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, there is a composition which comprises at least one bioflavonoid, at least one organic acid for improvement of seed germination rate and early stage plant development. Preferably the composition includes at least one wetting agent. In particular, it is preferred that the at least one bioflavonoid, the at least one organic acid and/or the at least one wetting agent are natural plant extracts or naturally produced elements.


Preferably, the composition is present in the topical composition at between 0.25 ml to 4 ml per litre of diluting agent such as water. However the dilution can vary, as would be understood by a person skilled in the art, depending on different factors such as soil condition, foliage cover, growth rate, crop type, weather, water used per hectare etc. The topical composition can be applied as a plant foliar spray on the roots, stems or leaves, or as an irrigation additive delivered via a drip system.


The composition improves the relationship with the soil microbes and the plant to provide an ongoing benefit to the plants health. The cycle of healthy soil and healthy plant can be maintained by additional applications through the growing season but single applications have shown an ongoing effect. Preferably, the product is applied to plants during the cool of the day, and preferably not prior to or just subsequent to rain. As the product is taken up by the leaves, it is better, if it is likely to rain within six hours to apply the product at a later time.


Most preferably, for best results, the product can be sprayed in a light mist and the spray be repeated some five days after the first spray. If, after a second spray, there is still signs of the infestation, the spraying can be repeated after a further five days.


The composition advantageously provides a way to regenerate poor soils and invigorate soils under stress conditions. The natural process of soil health regeneration can take years as each season provides a short window of opportunity. With the embodiments of the present invention the time to regenerate a healthy soil is considerable shortened. Ongoing soil health is also maintained throughout a season and onto the next. Healthy soils and crops can sequester far more carbon into the soil which can contribute to reduced CO2 gases in the atmosphere. Healthy soils and crops provide higher nutritional value and flavour to food.


In a particularly preferred embodiment, the composition comprises:

    • between 10% to 25% (by weight) at least one bioflavonoid; or
    • between 30% to 60% (by weight) at least one organic acid; and/or
    • between 10% to 20% (by weight) at least one wetting agent.


In particular, the at least one bioflavonoid is a citrus agent.


As the composition comprises entirely of natural plant extracts and organic acids there is no toxicity at recommended topical application dilution levels. The naturally extracted components of the compositions may be found on lists, such as the USDA GRAS list which is generally recognised as safe levels for food or dietary supplements. Specifically the safe levels as recommended by the USDA GRAS list are much higher doses than the levels of the composition in a topical application dilution level. Thus the compositions are much more acceptable to consumers who prefer and demand less harmful agricultural additives to those currently used in traditional agricultural methods.


The applicant has discovered that when plants or soil have been treated with said composition, the composition effects noticeable improvement of plant development particularly in new plant varieties which have been selectively bred or which have been genetically modified. This is especially important for food crops and other important plant types.


In a preferred embodiment, the composition is in a liquid form. The composition is able to be easily produced into a topical composition by being diluted with a diluting agent such as water. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the composition is present at between 0.4 to 4m1 when diluted in 1 L of water or other diluting agent.


The Applicant has conducted trials of the composition by applying the composition to a loam soil with medium organic matter for growing grapes under irrigation. Two separate trials were conducted with the soil being treated with the composition being compared with an adjacent batch of soil that was untreated (control). The first batch of results are shown below:









TABLE 1





Control Analysis

















Nematode detail











(# per gram or # per mL)




Classifed by type and



Hyphal
identified to genus.














Organism

Active Bacterial
Total Bacterial
Active Fungal
Total Fungal
Diameter
(if section is blank,


Biomass Data
Dry Weight
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μm)
no nematodes identified.)


















Results
 0.910
0.9text missing or illegible when filed
13.8
117 
421
4
Bacterial Feeders



Comments
Too Dry
Below range
Below range
Above range
In range

Bacterial Feeder
0.70
















Expected
Low
0.45
 1
100
10
200

Fungal Feeders



Range
High
0.55
10
300
25

text missing or illegible when filed 00


Fungal Feeder
0.5text missing or illegible when filed











text missing or illegible when filed












text missing or illegible when filed

0.text missing or illegible when filed 2










Root Feeders










Root Feedetext missing or illegible when filed
0.text missing or illegible when filed














Protozoa (Numbers/g)
Total
Mycorrhizal Colonizatoin (%)














Flagellates
Amoebae
Ciliates
Nematodes text missing or illegible when filed g
ENDO
ECTO

















Results
1text missing or illegible when filed 2text missing or illegible when filed
1text missing or illegible when filed 78
0
1.98
11%
 0%


Comments
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low














Expected
Low
5000

text missing or illegible when filed 000


text missing or illegible when filed 0

10
40%
40%


Range
High


100 
20
80%
80%















Organism
Total Fungal to
Active to Total
Active to Total
Active Fungal
Plant Available N


Biomass Ratios
Tot. Bacterial
Fungal
Bacterial
to Act. Bacterial
Supply (kg/text missing or illegible when filed )





Results
30.47
0.28
0.07
118.20
<28


Comments
High
High
Low
High













Expected
Low
2
0.1text missing or illegible when filed
0.15
1



Range
High
5
0.2 
0.2 
2






text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed














TABLE 2





Treated Sample Analysis

















Nematode detail











(# per gram or # per mL)




Classifed by type and



Hyphal
identified to genus.














Organism

Active Bacterial
Total Bacterial
Active Fungal
Total Fungal
Diameter
(if section is blank,


Biomass Data
Dry Weight
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μm)
no nematodes identified.)


















Results
 0.880
3.05

text missing or illegible when filed .35

 279
279
4
Bacterial Feeders



Comments
Too Dry
In range
Below range
Above range
In range

Bacterial Feeder
0.89
















Expected
Low
0.45
1
100
10
200

Fungal Feeders



Range
High
0.85
10
3text missing or illegible when filed 0
25
600

Fungal Feeder
0.59











text missing or illegible when filed












text missing or illegible when filed

0.07










Root Feeders










Root Feedetext missing or illegible when filed
1.04














Protozoa (Numbers/g)
Total
Mycorrhizal Colonizatoin (%)














Flagellates
Amoebae
Ciliates
Nematodes text missing or illegible when filed g
ENDO
ECTO

















Results
2427
0
0
2.85
12%
 0%


Comments
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low














Expected
Low
5000
5000
50
10
40%
40%


Range
High


100
20
80%
80%















Organism
Total Fungal to
Active to Total
Active to Total
Active Fungal
Plant Available N


Biomass Ratios
Tot. Bacterial
Fungal
Bacterial
to Act. Bacterial
Supply (kg/text missing or illegible when filed )





Results
29.88
1.00
0.33

text missing or illegible when filed 1.08

<28


Comments
High
High
High
High













Comments
Low
2
0.15
0.15
1



Range
High
5
0.2 
0.2 
2






text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed







As can be seen in Table 1 for the Control Sample, the soil has a very high fungal count which was not coming from mycorrhizal fungi but rather saprophytic fungi. Saprophytic fungi break down plant organic matter and the control sample had most of the bacterial and fungal populations present in a dormant form which was not providing nutrients to the grape vines. In comparison, as is shown in the treated sample depicted in TABLE 2, the soil sample treated with the present composition had a very good fungal component and good bacterial activity. It is clear when comparing the two results that the total pools have been activated in the treated sample of Table 2, providing a soil that can increase delivery of nutrients to the plant.


Results of a further trial are detailed below using the same soil samples:









TABLE 3





Control Sample Analysis

















Nematode detail























(# per gram or # per mL)










Classifed by type and









Hyphal
identified to genus.














Organism

Active Bacterial
Total Bacterial
Active Fungal
Total Fungal
Diameter
(if section is blank,


Biomass Data
Dry Weight
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μm)
no nematodes identified.)





Results
 0.780
39.5
3text missing or illegible when filed 0
3.47
328
2.75


Comments
In Good Range
Above range
Above range
Below range
In range















Expected
Low
0.45
1
100
10
200




Range
Hig
0.85
10
300
25
600














Protozoa (Numbers/g)
Total
Mycorrhizal Colonizatoin (%)














Flagellates
Amoebae
Ciliates
Nematodes text missing or illegible when filed g
ENDO
ECTO

















Results
 738
 547
35
Not Ordered
35%
46%


Comments
Low
Low
Low

Low
Good














Expected
Low
12000
12000
50
10
40%
40%


Range
Hig


100 
20
80%
80%















Organism
Total Fungal to
Active to Total
Active to Total
Active Fungal
Plant Available N


Biomass Ratios
Tot. Bacterial
Fungal
Bacterial
to Act. Bacterial
Supply (kg/text missing or illegible when filed )





Results
1.06
0.01
0.13
0.09
<28


Comments
Low
Low
Low
Low













Expected
Low
2
0.15
0.15
1



Range
Hig
5
0.2 
0.2 
2






text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed














TABLE 4





Treated Sample Analysis - 200 ml of composition

















Nematode detail























(# per gram or # per mL)










Classifed by type and









Hyphal
identified to genus.














Organism

Active Bacterial
Total Bacterial
Active Fungal
Total Fungal
Diameter
(if section is blank,


Biomass Data
Dry Weight
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μg/g)
(μm)
no nematodes identified.)





Results
 0.780

text missing or illegible when filed

291
1.text missing or illegible when filed
27text missing or illegible when filed
2.75


Comments
In Good Range
Above range
In range
Below range
In range















Expected
Low
0.4text missing or illegible when filed
1
100
10
200




Range
Hig
0.85
10 
3text missing or illegible when filed
25

text missing or illegible when filed 00















Protozoa (Numbers/g)
Total
Mycorrhizal Colonizatoin (%)














Flagellates
Amoebae
Ciliates
Nematodes text missing or illegible when filed g
ENDO
ECTO

















Results
7344
7344
543
Not Ordered
78%
 4%


Comments
Low
Low
High

Good
Low














Expected
Low
1200
1200

text missing or illegible when filed

10
40%
40%


Range
Hig


100
20
80%
80%















Organism
Total Fungal to
Active to Total
Active to Total
Active Fungal
Plant Available N


Biomass Ratios
Tot. Bacterial
Fungal
Bacterial
to Act. Bacterial
Supply (kg/text missing or illegible when filed )





Results
0.96
 0.004
0.05
0.08
84.text missing or illegible when filed 2


Comments
Low
Low
Low
Low













Expected
Low
2

text missing or illegible when filed 5

0.15
1



Range
Hig
5
0.2
0.2 
2






text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed







Once again, in the control sample, the mycorrhizal colonisation consisted of a combination of Endo and Ecto species at the low ends of the recommended ranges. The Endo Mycorrhiza (VAM) reveals very little vesical formation and few hypha. In comparison, the soil treated with the composition of the present invention had an improved mycorrhizal colonisation, particularly Endo mycorrhizae, which was at a good level. In this sample Endo Mycorrhizae (VAM) revealed many healthy vesical and hyphal formations. Thus, once again, it is clear when comparing the two results that the total pools have been activated in the treated sample of Table 4, providing a soil that can increase delivery of nutrients to the plant.


The applicant has found that this composition for improving soil health can be used on various food crops such as vegetables, fruit and nut trees, turf, and broad acre crops such as canola, soy and wheat.


The at least one bioflavonoid may be selected from the group including: citrus fruit plant extracts, including grapefruit, lemon, lime, pomelo, orange, tangerine, bitter orange extract.


The at least one organic acid may be selected from the group including: malic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, salicylic acid, caprylic acid, Silicic acid, Ascorbic acid and tartaric acid.


The at least one wetting agent may be selected from the group including: Saponins.


In a particularly preferred embodiment, the compositions mentioned above can include other plant foliar or irrigation additives which can provide additional benefits such as plant growth regulators, fungicides, bactericides and the like.


Through-out the specification and claims the word “comprise” and its derivatives is intended to have an inclusive rather than exclusive meaning unless the context requires otherwise.


It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that many modifications and variations may be made to the methods of the invention described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A composition for improvement of soil condition to facilitate enhanced plant growth wherein the composition comprises: at least one bioflavonoid; andat least one organic acid.
  • 2. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition includes at least one wetting agent.
  • 3. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the at least one wetting agent is a natural plant extract.
  • 4. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the at least one bioflavonoid is a natural plant extract.
  • 5. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the at least one organic acid is naturally produced.
  • 6. A composition according to claim 2 being in the form of a liquid.
  • 7. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the composition comprises 0.25 to 4 ml in a topical composition per litre of water or other diluting agent.
  • 8. A composition according to claim 7, wherein the topical composition is suitable for application to plant foliar including roots, leaves
  • 9. A composition according to claim 7, wherein the topical composition is suitable for application as an irrigation additive.
  • 10. A composition according to claim 2, comprising: between 10% to 20% (by weight) bioflavonoid; orbetween 30% to 60% (by weight) organic acid; and/orbetween 10% to 20% (by weight) wetting agent.
  • 11. A composition according to claim 2, comprising: between 10% to 20% (by weight) bioflavonoid which is a natural plant extract; orbetween 30% to 60% (by weight) organic acid which is naturally produced; and/orbetween 10% to 20% (by weight) wetting agent which is a natural plant extract.
  • 12. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the at least one bioflavonoid is selected from the group including: citrus fruit plant extracts, including grapefruit, lemon, lime, orange, pomelo, tangerine, bitter orange extract.
  • 13. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the at least one organic acid is selected from the group including: malic acid, citric acid, Silicic acid, Ascorbic acid, lactic acid, salicylic acid, caprylic acid and tartaric acid.
  • 14. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the at least one wetting agent is selected from the group consisting of: Saponins and glycerine.
  • 15. A composition according to claim 2, wherein the composition includes plant foliar or irrigation treatments including at least one of plant growth regulators, bactericides or fungicides.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2020901371 Apr 2020 AU national