This invention relates to a compostable or recyclable packaging wrap used for shipping.
A conventional wrapping material is polyethylene. For example, a packaging material, e.g., a bubble wrap, can be used to surround and cushion an item to be packed in a shipping box and shipped. Alternatively, other packaging materials can be molded to form a particular shape to hold an item being shipped and can be placed in a shipping box.
Polyethylene is relatively inexpensive and easily formed into a variety of shapes, but is not compostable. Consequently, disposing of the material of the container can be a problem.
A packaging wrap that provides protection to an item to be shipped and that is recyclable or compostable is disclosed.
In general, in one aspect, a compostable or recyclable packaging wrap includes: a strip that is primarily formed of starch, wherein the strip is flexible such that the strip can be rolled.
The foregoing and other implementations can each optionally include one or more of the following features, alone or in combination. The one or more compostable materials include at least one of a grain starch, a root starch, a vegetable starch, and combinations thereof. A depth of the strip is between ⅛ inches and 2.5 inches. In a state in which the strip is rolled, a radius of the rolled strip is between 1 inch and 20 inches. A density of the strip is within at least one of a first range that is 0.25-4.0 g/cm3, a second range that is 0.6-1.0 g/cm3, a third range that is 0.8-2.0 g/cm3, and a fourth range that is 1.0-3.5 g/cm3. The strip comprises: a plurality of sections, wherein a boundary between two adjacent sections of the plurality of sections is perforated. At least 85% of the strip includes a starch by weight of the packaging wrap.
In general, another aspect, a compostable or recyclable packaging wrap that includes: a first film that is primarily formed of one or more compostable or recyclable materials; a second film that is primarily formed of one or more compostable or recyclable materials; a plurality of pads, each pad being are surrounded by the first film and the second film and being primarily formed of one or more compostable or recyclable materials, wherein the packaging wrap is flexible such that the packaging wrap can be rolled.
The foregoing and other implementations can each optionally include one or more of the following features, alone or in combination. The one or more compostable or recyclable materials for the first film and the second film include at least one of polylactic acid (PLA), poly(beta-amino) esters (PBAE), polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), polycapralactones (PCL), polybutyrate adipate terephthalate (PBAT) polyvinylalcohol (PVA), ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH), and combinations thereof. The one or more compostable or recyclable materials for the first film and the second film includes at least one of LDPE, MDPE, HDPE, polyethylene terephthalate, and combinations thereof. The one or more compostable or recyclable materials for the plurality of pads include at least one of a grain starch, a root starch, a vegetable starch, and combinations thereof. A depth of the first film is between 1/16 inches and 1.25 inches. A depth of the second film is between 1/16 and 1.25 inches. A depth of each pad of the plurality of pads is between 1/16 inches and 2 inches. In a state in which the packaging wrap is rolled, a radius of the rolled packaging wrap is between 1 inch and 20 inches. A density of the plurality of pads is within at least one of a first range that is 0.25-4.0 g/cm3, a second range that is 0.6-1.0 g/cm3, a third range that is 0.8-2.0 g/cm3, and a fourth range that is 1.0-3.5 g/cm3. The packaging wrap further includes a plurality of sections, wherein a boundary between two adjacent sections of the plurality of sections is perforated. Each section of the plurality of sections include a respective pad of the plurality of pads. The first film and the second film is attached to the plurality of pads using an adhesive. At least 85% of each pad of the plurality of pads includes a starch by weight of the pad.
Potential advantages may include (and are not limited to) one or more of the following. The packaging wrap is compostable, so all of the components of the packaging wrap are easily disposable. In certain cases, the packaging wrap can be perforated or scored such that a user can easily detach a section of the packaging wrap. In certain cases, the packaging wrap includes pads that are surrounded by films to provide additional protection to an item being shipped. In these cases, the films surrounding the pads are also compostable or recyclable, and also easily disposed.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Initially, some terminology may be beneficial. “Compostable” indicates both that a product will decompose quickly, e.g., within 180 days, and that the product will decompose into material that can be used as fertilizer (e.g., per ASTM D6400 or EN 13432). “Recyclable” indicates that a product can be reused or treated in order to be made suitable for reuse.
Most conventional packaging wraps are not compostable, and some are not recyclable. However, packaging wraps formed primarily of materials such as a starch are compostable as well as providing protection to an item being wrapped. In some implementations, a compostable packaging wrap can be rolled to save the storage space or being moved easily.
Referring to
The compostable packaging wrap 100 can be primarily composed of compostable material. For example, packaging wrap 100 can be primarily composed of a starch, such as a grain starch (e.g., a corn starch, a wheat starch or sorghum, also known as milo), a root starch (e.g., a potato starch), or a vegetable starch. In some implementations, a combinations of different starches can be used. In some implementations, a starch can be mixed with one or more compostable or recyclable other materials, e.g., a plant fiber. The starch can provide at least 50%, e.g., at least 75%, e.g., at least 85%, e.g., at least or 95-99%, by weight of the packaging wrap 100. In some implementations, the packaging wrap 100 consists of starch. In some implementations, the packaging wrap 100 can be formed using an extrusion process.
In some implementations, other materials that do not interfere with the compostable nature of the packaging wrap 100, e.g., a softener to improve adhesion of the starch, or a preservative or anti-fungal agent, can be present, but only in small quantities. For example, at least 85%, e.g., at least 90%, e.g., 90-95% or 95-99%, by weight of the compostable packaging wrap 100 is made of starch. Polyvinyl alcohol can be present, e.g., 5-10% by weight.
In some implementations, the packaging wrap 100 is entirely compostable, i.e., consists of compostable materials. In some implementations, the packaging wrap 100 is composed of a combination of compostable and recyclable materials For example, in some implementations, additional materials, e.g., a water-retarding materials, are added to the compostable material, e.g., the starch, such that the combination is recyclable.
In some implementations, the material of the packaging wrap 100 can be a foam material, e.g., include small pores or voids spread substantially uniformly through the packaging wrap 100. For example, 10-80% of the volume of the packaging wrap 100 can be pores or voids, e.g., 25-75%, 25-50%, 10-25%, and 50-75%. The maximum size of the pores or voids can be about 1 mm. Although the packaging wrap 100 could be a foam material, it is generally incompressible.
The packaging wrap 100, in unrolled and unused form, can has a length that is greater than its width. For example, a length L1 of the compostable packaging wrap 100 can be between 10 inches and 500 feet, and a width W1 of the compostable packaging wrap 100 can be between 6 inches and 48 inches. In this example, the size of the compostable packaging wrap 100 represents the size of the entire unrolled compostable packaging wrap 100. However, the size of the compostable packaging wrap 100 is not limited to these example numbers. The compostable packaging wrap 100 can have any suitable size to wrap an item.
The compostable packaging wrap 100 also has a depth D1 (i.e., a thickness) that is less than the width W1. The depth D1 of the compostable packaging wrap 100 is such that the compostable packaging wrap 100 can be wrapped around a central post or tube, e.g., as shown in
For some materials, the same material can have different densities depending on the manufacturing process, e.g., the degree of compression of the starch. In such cases, the density of the packaging wrap 100 can be selected, e.g., by selection of an appropriate processing parameters. For many materials, the greater the density (e.g., the higher the degree of compaction), the less flexible the material is. In such cases, the density of the packaging wrap 100 can be selected such that the compostable packaging wrap 100 can have enough flexibility to be rolled as described above. Where the compostable packaging wrap 100 is primarily formed of starch, the density of the compostable packaging wrap 100 can be about 0.25-4.0 g/cm3, e.g., 0.6-1.0 g/cm3, 0.8-2.0 g/cm3, 1.0-3.5 g/cm3.
In some implementations, the density of the packaging wrap 100 is substantially uniform, e.g., the material lacks pores or pores are distributed substantially uniformly through the sheet, and the degree of compaction of the material is similarly substantially uniform. However, in some implementations, the density of the packaging wrap 100 can vary along the length or width of the sheet, e.g., the degree of compaction of the material can vary.
Referring to
The compostable packaging wrap 100 can be wound around the center axis (e.g., the center pole) multiple times. For example, where the compostable packaging wrap 100 is rolled, a radius R1 of the rolled compostable packaging wrap 100 can be between 1 inch and 20 inches. The radius of the compostable packaging wrap 100 should not be limited to these particular numbers, but can be any suitable number.
Referring to
In some implementations, the size of the each section of the multiple sections can be the same. For example, a length L2 of the first section 210 can be the same as a length L2′ of the second section 220. In some implementations, different sections can have different sizes. For example, the length L2 of the first section 210 can be different from the length L2′ of the second section 220. In this example, a user can use different sizes of wraps to wrap different sizes of items. That is, a user can use a smaller section to wrap a small item and a larger section to wrap a large item.
Referring to
In some implementations, where the compostable packaging wrap 200 is primarily formed of a starch, the depths D2 and D3 should be determined such that a section is not easily detached from the compostable packaging wrap 200 before a user detaches the section from the compostable packaging wrap 200. Moreover, when the compostable packaging wrap 200 is rolled, a section can be detached because of the tension between two sections, e.g., the first section 210 and the second section 220. Thus, the depths D2 and D3 should be shallow enough not to be detached by the tension. In these implementations, the depths D2 and D3 can be between 1/64 inches and 1.2 inches.
In some implementations, the scored or perforated portion 230 can include grooves that are formed only one surface of the compostable packaging wrap 200. For example, the scored or perforated portion 230 can include only the first score 230a that is formed on the top surface of the compostable packaging wrap 200. Alternatively, the scored or perforated portion 230 can include only the second score 230b that is formed on the bottom surface of the compostable packaging wrap 200. In these implementations, the depth of the grooves can be larger than the depth of the grooves where the scored or perforated portion 230 includes both the first score 230a and the second score 230b.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In some implementations, each section of the compostable or recyclable packaging wrap 300 includes a pad portion in a central area of the section and a boundary portion that surrounds the pad portion. For example, the first section 310 includes a pad portion 312 and a boundary portion 314 that surrounds the pad portion 312 and the second section 320 includes a pad portion 322 and a boundary portion 324 that surrounds the pad portion 322. The boundary portion 324 can have a margin M between the pad portion 322 and the edge of the first section 310. For example, the margin M can be between ½ inches and 5 inches. The margin is not limited to these numbers, but ca be any suitable number.
Referring to
In some implementations, a depth of each film can be a half of a depth D4. For example, the depth of the film can be 1/16 inches and 1.25 inches. In some implementations, a depth of the pad, e.g., the first pad 342, can be between 1/16 inches and 2 inches. However the depth D5 is not limited to these numbers. The depth D5 can be any suitable number.
In some implementations, the scored or perforated portion 330 includes a first score 330a that is formed on a surface of the first film 301 and a second score 330b that is formed on a surface of the second film 302. The scores 330a and 330b can include multiple grooves formed on the surfaces of the films 301 and 302. The two films 301 and 302 adjacent to the scored or perforated portion 330 are coupled together without any pad between the two films 301 and 302. Alternatively, in some implementations, the scored or perforated portion 330 can have perforations that extend entirely through the sheet of the packaging wrap 300.
In some implementations, the pads, e.g., the first pad 342 and the second pad 344, can be primarily formed of compostable material. For example, the compostable material for the pads 342 and 344 is primarily a starch, e.g., a grain starch (e.g., a corn starch, a wheat starch or sorghum, also known as milo), a root starch (e.g., a potato starch), or a vegetable starch. In some implementations, a combinations of different starches can be used for the pads 342 and 344. In some implementations, at least 85%, e.g., 90-95%, of the pad portion 312 can include a starch by weight of the pad portion 312.
In some implementations, the films, e.g., the first film 301 and the second film 302, can be compostable, e.g., a bioplastic that meets ASTM D6400 standards. Example materials for a compostable film include polymers based on one or more of polylactic acid (PLA), poly(beta-amino) esters (PBAE), polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), polycapralactones (PCL), polybutyrate adipate terephthalate (PBAT) polyvinylalcohol (PVA), or ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH). In addition, any combinations of these materials can be used for the films 301 and 302. For example, a combination of PBAT and PE can be used for the films 301 and 302. As another example, a combination of PE and PLA can be used for the films 301 and 302. In some implementations, the polymer can be mixed with an organic product, e.g., a starch.
In some implementations, the films, e.g., the first film 301 and the second film 302, can be recyclable. A suitable material for the recyclable film is polyethylene. For example, the films 301 and 302 can include LDPE, MDPE, HDPE, or polyethylene terephthalate. An advantage of polyethylene is ease of fabrication and good water resistance.
In some implementations, the films, e.g., the first film 301 and the second film 302, can be paper sheets. If the paper is thin enough or is perforated, the paper is compostable. Optionally, the paper can be lined with a water-repellent coating. Either the inner surface of the film, or the outer surface, or both can be lined with the water-repellent coating. The water-repellent coating can be a compostable material, e.g., wax. In this example, the film with paper and coating is compostable. Alternatively, the water-repellent coating can be a recyclable material. In this example, the layer with paper and coating is recyclable.
Referring to
A variety of combinations of the features discussed above are possible. The drawings show only a limited number of possible combinations, and it should be assumed that the various features described can be used together in any consistent combination. A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/702,859, filed Jul. 24, 2018, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3304219 | Nickerson | Feb 1967 | A |
3683760 | Silva | Aug 1972 | A |
5208267 | Neumann et al. | May 1993 | A |
5564570 | Jaszai | Oct 1996 | A |
5660903 | Anderson | Aug 1997 | A |
5665439 | Andersen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5733403 | Morley | Mar 1998 | A |
5830548 | Andersen | Nov 1998 | A |
5897017 | Lantz | Apr 1999 | A |
5912058 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6050412 | Clough | Apr 2000 | A |
6257764 | Lantz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283296 | Newman | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6619500 | Lantz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6938968 | Tanimoto | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7601657 | Zhou | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7870992 | Schille et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8182457 | Olson | May 2012 | B2 |
8557367 | Netravali | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8617684 | Nomura | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8763811 | Lantz | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9550618 | Jobe | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9957098 | Jobe | May 2018 | B2 |
10046901 | Jobe | Aug 2018 | B1 |
20020164465 | Curro et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030082357 | Gokay | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129356 | Laskorski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040058119 | Wynne | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20070051782 | Lantz | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080289302 | Vulpitta | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090001086 | Roderick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100314397 | Williams | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110248038 | Mayer | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110259895 | Parenteau et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120070609 | Poppe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097067 | Fascio | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120279896 | Lantz | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120312814 | Tolibas-Spurlock | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140272163 | Tilton | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140319018 | Collison | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160052692 | Branham | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160194135 | Baker | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20180086538 | Jobe | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180194534 | Jobe et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180327171 | Waltermire | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180339838 | Hall | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000422 | May 2012 | EP |
2006062691 | Mar 2006 | JP |
WO 93-06013 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9932374 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 20061 17801 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 15/089,344, filed Apr. 1, 2016, Jobe. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/043053, dated Dec. 2, 2019, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200031556 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62702859 | Jul 2018 | US |