The present disclosure is directed to compound archery bows having pulleys at the ends of the bow limbs to control the force/draw characteristics of the bow, and more particularly to both single-cam bows having a power let-off cam mounted on the end of one of the bow limbs and dual-cam bows having power let-off cams mounted on the ends of both bow limbs.
Single-cam and dual-cam compound archery bows have a power cam mounted on one or both ends of the bow limbs to control the draw force on the bowstring and the bending of the limbs as the bowstring is drawn. In single-cam bows, there is a power cam on the end of one bow limb, and a wheel on the end of the other bow limb to facilitate control or time take-up of a power cable at the power cam and let-out of the bowstring and control cables at the power cam as the bow is drawn. In dual-cam bows, power cams are mounted on the ends of both limbs, with each including groove segments to control let-out of the bowstring cable at the opposing cam.
A general object of the present disclosure is to provide a compound archery bow that achieves enhanced power and arrow speed as compared with compound archery bows of the prior art and/or to reduce or eliminate timing issues between cams on dual cam bows.
The present disclosure embodies a number of aspects that can be implemented separately from or in combination with each other.
A compound archery bow, in accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, includes a handle having projecting limbs, and first and second pulleys mounted on the limbs for rotation around respective axes. At least a first of the pulleys includes a flat base with a bowstring let-out groove on the base and a bowstring anchor adjacent to the bowstring let-out groove. A draw module is disposed on the base, a cable groove extends along the draw module, and first and second cable anchors are disposed on the base adjacent to respective ends of the cable groove. The cable groove on the draw module is continuous in a plane perpendicular to the axis of the first pulley. A bow cable arrangement includes a bowstring cable extending from the bowstring anchor on the first pulley around the bowstring let-out groove and then toward the second pulley. A first cable extends from the first anchor on the first pulley through a portion of the cable groove on the module and then toward the second pulley. A second cable extends from the second anchor toward the second pulley. Draw of the bowstring cable away from the bow handle lets out bowstring cable from the bowstring cable groove on the first pulley and rotates the first pulley around its axis, lets out the first cable from the groove on the module and takes up the second cable into the groove on the module including a portion of such groove previously occupied by the first cable.
The disclosure, together with additional objects, features, advantages and aspects thereof, will best be understood from the following description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Pulley 40 includes a flat base 42 having a bowstring let-out groove 23 extending around at least a portion of the periphery of the base in a plane perpendicular to the axis of axle 18. A bowstring cable end 11 extends from a bowstring anchor 17 on base 42 around groove 23 and toward pulley 40′ at the opposing end of the bow, at which bowstring cable end 11′ extends through groove 23 of base 42′ to an anchor 17′. A draw module 16 is disposed on base 42. Draw module 16 in this embodiment preferably is permanently mounted on base 42, such as by being formed in one piece with the base. Draw module 16 has a groove 22 that extends around the module and around the axis of rotation of pulley 40. Groove 22 is continuous in a plane perpendicular to the axis of axle 18. Pulley 40′ is a mirror image or near-mirror image of pulley 40, and corresponding elements of pulley 40′ are indicated with the same reference numeral and a prime symbol.
A first cable end 13 extends from an anchor 15 on base 42 around a portion of groove 22 on module 16 and then toward pulley 40′, at which the opposing end 12′ is secured to an anchor 14′, preferably after passing around a portion of groove 22 on module 16′. A second cable end 12 extends from an anchor 14 on pulley 40, preferably through at least a portion of groove 22 on module 16, to pulley 40′, at which the opposing cable end 13′ extends through a portion of groove 22 on module 16′ to an anchor 15′. Thus, as bowstring cable 11,11′ is pulled away from handle 9 (to the left in
The opposing pulleys thus are slaved together and eliminate any cam-to-cam timing issues. Cable ends 13,13′ are let out at a significantly lower rate than take-up of cable ends 12,12′, which results in maximum limb compression of the opposing bow limbs. This helps achieve a high level of stored bow energy, dynamic efficiency and kinetic energy, achieving improved arrow speed. Stops 19, 19′ on pulleys 40, 40′ abut the bow limbs to limit bow draw.
In bow 8a of
Bow 8b of
Adjustment of the bow draw lengths in the embodiments of
There thus has been disclosed a compound archery bow that fully satisfies all of the objects and aims previously set forth. The bow has been disclosed in conjunction with a number of exemplary embodiments. Modifications and variations readily will suggest themselves to persons of ordinary skill in the art in view of the foregoing description. The disclosure is intended to embrace all such modifications and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/290,750 filed Nov. 3, 2008, and claims priority from application Ser. No. 61/014,834 filed Dec. 19, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3990425 | Ketchum | Nov 1976 | A |
4060066 | Kudlacek | Nov 1977 | A |
4300521 | Schmitt | Nov 1981 | A |
4333443 | Roelle | Jun 1982 | A |
4368718 | Simonds et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4401097 | Simonds et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4438753 | Simonds | Mar 1984 | A |
4440142 | Simonds | Apr 1984 | A |
4478203 | Hayes | Oct 1984 | A |
4561413 | Jennings | Dec 1985 | A |
4774927 | Larson | Oct 1988 | A |
4926833 | Darlington | May 1990 | A |
4971020 | Soderstrom et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5040520 | Nurney | Aug 1991 | A |
5368006 | McPherson | Nov 1994 | A |
5505185 | Miller | Apr 1996 | A |
5975067 | Strother | Nov 1999 | A |
6082346 | Andrews et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6082347 | Darlington | Jul 2000 | A |
6237582 | McPherson | May 2001 | B1 |
6247466 | McPherson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250293 | Andrews | Jun 2001 | B1 |
RE37544 | Darlington | Feb 2002 | E |
6360735 | Larson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6443139 | McPherson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446619 | McPherson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6688295 | Miller | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691692 | Adkins | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718963 | Wheeler | Apr 2004 | B1 |
D510974 | Gallops, Jr. | Oct 2005 | S |
6990970 | Darlington | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7082937 | Land | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7305979 | Yehle | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7441555 | Larson | Oct 2008 | B1 |
20040003806 | Blahnik | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20090188482 | Strother | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090255520 | Strother | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288650 | Batdor | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320816 | Strother | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100051005 | Wilson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61014834 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12290750 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 12846217 | US |