Early bows consisted of a simple stick with a string attached to each end. In 1969, U.S. Pat. No. 3,486,495 (which is incorporated herein by reference) was granted to Holless Allen for a compound bow. By providing eccentric leverage draw force modules on the end of limbs with operating cabling, the force draw curve of the Allen compound bow could be manipulated to store more energy during the draw cycle, firing a faster arrow and lessening the holding weight at full draw, thereby allowing better aiming. As the bowstring was pulled, it was unspooled from the draw force modules, while cabling pulling on the opposing limbs was spooled on the draw force modules.
A problem is that one cam could move independently of another during letoff at the end of the draw. Thus there would be an inconsistent shift in nock travel at the string, anchor and release, resulting in inaccuracy.
Currently bows have become popular with cables from cams attaching to the opposite cams to synchronize the cams. However, a problem has risen with limb twist and cam lean due to the cable attachment to the cam. While drawing the bow, both the bowstring and cables pulling at their respective points near the center of the axle balance each other to effect a level limb and straight cam alignment.
However, near the end of the draw, letoff is accomplished by transferring the force of pull on the bowstring to the take up and letoff cables which hold the tension at full draw. Therefore in a bow with 80% letoff, 80% of the pull by the bowstring on the axle has been transferred over to the cam pull point on the axle. A problem with the design is that the cable pulling at a point away from the center of the axle causes limb twist and cam lean, resulting in limb stress and inaccuracy.
With a bowstring groove, a cable take up groove, and a cable let out groove, the cable pulls to the right of the axle, causing limb twist and cam lean.
An improvement was accomplished by using only two grooves, one for the bowstring groove, and using only one groove for both take up and let out cables. This results in the cable pulling closer to the center of the axle, reducing limb twist and cam lean. However, as tension was still transferred from the first bowstring groove to the second cable groove upon letoff, limb flex and draw force modules straightness was still negatively affected.
An additional problem with draw force modules is that the friction of the grooves causes string and cable wear and thus reduces the speed of the arrow.
Examples of some prior compound bows employing cam systems are shown in Ketchum (U.S. Pat. No. 3,990,425), Simonds et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,097), Simonds (U.S. Pat. No. 4,483,753), Miller (U.S. Pat. No. 6,688,295), Darlington (U.S. Pat. No. 6,990,970) and Larson (U.S. Pat. No. 7,441,555) all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Briefly stated, a compound bow comprises a handle portion, and an upper limb and lower limb supported by the handle portion and extending from opposite ends of the handle portion. A first rotatable draw force module with two grooves is mounted on the top limb for rotation about an axle. A second rotatable draw force module with two grooves is mounted on the bottom limb for rotation about a second axle.
The two draw force modules can be substantially the same, with the top and bottom draw force modules being mirror images of each other (as seen from
Now, when the bow goes into letoff, instead of the bowstring transferring much force over to the second, let out, groove, the force continues to pull on the first groove. Therefore when the bow is drawn and it goes into letoff at full draw, the limbs are center flexed, and the draw force modules are straight aligned, resulting in greater limb durability and accuracy.
A bowstring is attached to the top draw force module, is trained about a portion of the first groove, extends down to and is trained about a portion of the first groove of the bottom draw force module, and is attached to the bottom draw force module.
A first constraining cable is attached to the top draw force module and is positioned to engage a portion of the same groove the bowstring utilizes (i.e., the first constraining cable is secured in the first groove of the top draw force module). The first constraining cable extends down and is trained around the second groove on the bottom draw force module, and attaches to the bottom draw force module.
A second constraining cable is attached to the bottom draw force module and is positioned to engage a portion of the same groove the bowstring utilizes. That is, the second constraining cable and the bowstring are both anchored in the first groove of the bottom draw force module. The second constraining cable extends up and is trained around the second groove on the top draw force module, and attaches to the top draw force module.
As the bow is drawn, the bowstring is reeled off a portion of the first grooves of top and bottom draw force modules, causing the draw force modules (and hence the grooves of the draw force modules) to rotate. As the draw force modules are rotated by the pull on the bowstring, the constraining cables are reeled on to a portion of the first grooves of the top and bottom draw force modules, thereby compressing the limbs. At the same time, the constraining cables are reeled off of the second grooves of top and bottom draw force modules. This synchronizes the two draw force modules. A draw force curve for the compound bow is determined by the relative radii of the first and second grooves of the draw force modules.
Reducing bowstring draw force, or letoff as it is called, can be accomplished by rotating the draw force modules so that the cable radius of the first groove (e.g., the distance between the cable in the first groove and the axle) of the draw force module is reduced to a point where it is nearly equal to the radius of the second groove (e.g., the distance between the second groove and the axle) of the draw force modules, depending on degree of letoff desired. Customarily a draw stop is utilized to effect a desired letoff of less than 100%, so that the bowstring will reel forward when it is released, propelling the arrow. However, in the preferred embodiment, where the cable radius of the first groove is larger than the radius of the second groove, a draw stop is not necessary.
A further improvement to the draw force module is application of a low-friction coating, such as polytetrafluoroethylene, to the grooves of the draw force modules. By reducing friction, string and cables have reduced wear. With reduced friction on the groove contact points where the cables are spooling to the cable guard, efficiency is increased and greater speed is attained.
As shown in
The draw force modules 4 and 6 are generally identical. Each draw force module defines a first groove 9 and 11, respectively and a second groove 19 and 15, respectively. Illustratively, the first grooves 9 and 11 are larger in circumference than the second grooves 19 and 15. In a preferred embodiment, the first grooves 9 and 11 are non-circular and define a varying radius (and are thus cam shaped); and the second grooves 19 and 15 are generally circular, as seen in FIGS. 3A,B. The axles 5 and 7 (and thus the axes of rotation) for the draw force modules are generally centered with respect to the second grooves 19 and 15, and are off-center with respect to the first grooves 9 and 11. The first grooves 9 and 11 are thus eccentric. Additionally, the second grooves 19 and 15 are positioned relative to the first grooves 9 and 11 such that at a point P on the first and second grooves, the distance from the first and second grooves to the axle 5 or 7 is substantially the same.
The draw force modules are configured such that the first and second grooves of a draw force module rotate together. That is, the rotational position of the second grooves 19 and 15 do not change with respect to the rotational position of the associated first grooves 9 and 11. To this end, the draw force modules can each be formed as a unitary part. Alternatively, the first and second grooves can be formed on separate wheels which are then connected securely together, for example, using fasteners, such as glue, bolts, screws, etc. In a further example, the first and second grooves can be formed on separate wheels, and the two wheels are each keyed to the axle, such that the two wheels rotate together (and are rotationally fixed relative to each other). In a further alternative, the axle can be formed integrally with the draw force module (whether the two grooves are formed on a unitary piece or on separate wheels).
A bowstring 8 extends between the two limbs 1 and 2 having its opposite ends secured to the draw force modules 4 and 6. The bow string 8 is secured at anchor point 10 in the first groove 9 of the upper draw force module 4, extends around the groove 9 and down to the lower draw force module 6. At the lower draw force module, the bow string 8 extends around the first groove 11 to be secured to the first groove of the lower draw force module at anchor point 12.
A first cable 13 is secured at one end in the first groove 9 of the upper draw force module 4. As seen, the anchor point 14 is proximate (and below) the anchor point 10. The cable 13 extends downwardly from the upper draw force module 4 toward the lower force module. The cable 13 extends around the back of the second groove 15 of the lower draw force module to be secured at its opposite end to the lower draw force module 6 at anchor point 16.
A second cable 17 is secured at one end to an anchor point 20 in the second groove 19 of the upper draw force module. The cable 17 extends over and around the groove 19 and then extends downwardly toward the lower draw force module, where the cable 17 is connected at its opposite end at an anchor point 18 in the first groove 11 of the lower draw force module. As seen, the anchor point 18 is proximate (and above) the anchor point 12.
Stated differently, the bow string 8 extends between the first grooves 9 and 11 of the upper and lower draw force modules 4 and 6, respectively. The first cable 13 extends between the first groove 9 of the upper draw force module 4 and the second groove 15 the lower draw force module 6. Lastly, the second cable 17 extends between the second groove 19 of the upper draw force module 4 and the first groove 11 of the lower draw force module 6. Thus, as seen in
In the illustrative embodiment, as seen in
As best seen in
Referring now to
The grooves of the draw force modules 4 and 6 can be coated with a low friction coating, such as polytetrafluoroethylene, as can the bowstring and cables. The application of a low-friction coating to the grooves of the draw force modules reduces friction between the draw force modules and the bow string 8 and cables 13, 17. This reduced friction will reduce wear on the bow string and cables have. With reduced friction on the groove contact points where the cables are spooling to the cable guard, efficiency is increased and greater speed is attained.
In addition to the specific embodiments disclosed, the invention is also directed to other embodiments having any possible combination of the invention as defined by the claims below. For instance the grooves of the draw force modules can be provided in many different shapes, draw stops may or may not be employed, different types of cable attachments may be used. Additionally, the axle need not be a separate piece, but may, for example, be formed integrally with its associated draw force module or with its associated limb.
As is known, when the bowstring of a compound bow is pulled, the force required to pull back the bowstring increases until peak weight is achieved. After this point, the force required to pull the bow string back decreases until letoff is reached. The respective shapes of the first grooves 9, 11 and the second grooves 19,15 of the draw force modules 4,6 will affect the draw force curve, and the amount (or distance) of pull of the bowstring to reach peak weight and letoff. Additionally, the draw force curve will be affected by the relative position of the anchor points of the bow string and cables on the first and second grooves.
The grooves or paths the string or cables take (i.e., the shape of the first and second grooves) may be any shape such as circular, eccentric, cam etc. Whatever draw force curve is desired may be achieved by changing the shape or shapes of the groove or path portions of the bowstring and cables.
In the embodiment shown, the first groove is non-circular and has a varying radius, and the second groove is circular. However, both grooves could be circular or both could be non-circular. Alternatively, the first groove could be circular, and the second groove could be non-circular. Further, in the illustrative embodiment, the upper and lower draw force modules are substantially identical. However, the grooves of the upper draw force module could be shaped differently or have a different circumference than the grooves of the lower draw force module.
At full draw, the arc defined by the length of cable in the first groove has a radius that is preferably greater than the radius of the arc defined by the length of cable in the second groove. However, at full draw, the radius defined by the arcs of the two lengths of cable could be the same. If this were to occur, both cables would be pulling at equal radius points, and a 100% letoff would occur.
A draw stop, known in the art as a peg, is attached to a draw force module which contacts the limb at a desired point, may be employed to stop rotation before a point of equal radius, so that the bowstring will move forward on release. In the illustrated embodiment, because the minimum radius of the first groove (i.e., the arc defined by the length of cable in the first groove) is larger than the radius of the second groove (i.e., the arc defined by the length of cable in the second groove), the draw force module will not be rotated to a position in which the point of equal radius is reached. Hence, in the illustrative embodiment, a draw stop is not necessary. Nonetheless, many archers prefer to have a draw stop, because they feel it enables the archer to always have the same amount of pull on the bow string, and facilitates holding the bowstring at full draw, and thus facilitates aiming and shooting of an arrow with the bow.
The above examples and disclosure are intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive.
This application claims priority from Provisional Application No. 61/364,920, filed Jul. 16, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3486495 | Holless | Dec 1969 | A |
3851638 | Alexander | Dec 1974 | A |
3990425 | Ketchum | Nov 1976 | A |
4112909 | Caldwell | Sep 1978 | A |
4368718 | Simonds et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4401097 | Simonds et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4438753 | Simonds | Mar 1984 | A |
4455990 | Barna | Jun 1984 | A |
4512326 | Jarrett | Apr 1985 | A |
4774927 | Larson | Oct 1988 | A |
4838236 | Kudlacek | Jun 1989 | A |
4886038 | Betters | Dec 1989 | A |
4926832 | Darlington | May 1990 | A |
4986250 | Darlington | Jan 1991 | A |
4995373 | Mussack | Feb 1991 | A |
5368006 | McPherson | Nov 1994 | A |
5649522 | Troncoso | Jul 1997 | A |
5678529 | Larson | Oct 1997 | A |
5791322 | McPherson | Aug 1998 | A |
5890480 | McPherson | Apr 1999 | A |
5934265 | Darlington | Aug 1999 | A |
5960778 | Larson | Oct 1999 | A |
5975067 | Strother | Nov 1999 | A |
6112732 | Larson | Sep 2000 | A |
6237582 | McPherson | May 2001 | B1 |
RE37544 | Darlington | Feb 2002 | E |
6446619 | McPherson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470870 | Schaar | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6666202 | Darlington | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6688295 | Miller | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6990970 | Darlington | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6994079 | Darlington | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7143757 | Cooper | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7305979 | Yehle | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7441555 | Larson | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7997259 | Wilson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8006679 | Strother | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8020544 | McPherson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8205607 | Darlington | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8276574 | Wilson | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8281774 | Grace | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281775 | Larson | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8360041 | Strother | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8371283 | Grace et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8534269 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20110023857 | Grace | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61364920 | Jul 2010 | US |