This invention is in the field of optics, and more particularly deals with tracking and sensing devices.
There is a need for a wide field-of-view compound eye optics for semi-active laser (SAL) spot-tracking missile seekers to provide precision guidance to targets, for illuminated image tracking, and for image sensing, all in the presence of elevated background illumination. An ideal device to meet these needs would provide a wide field of view (>10° cone angle) without the need for moving parts. The device would include spectral and angle filtering in the optical portion, plus electrical noise reduction. The background illumination could include the sun in the FOV and within 1° of the target. The illumination could, for example, be a near-infrared (NIR), repetitively pulsed laser. The device would produce an electronic signal to enable a tracking system to follow the target. Such a signal could, for example, be a simple set of voltages or digital data, indicating whether or not the target is centered in the FOV of the device and, if it is not centered, indicating the direction off center where the target is located.
Current SAL seekers, for example, use single aperture optics and suffer from a limited FOV (about 10°), which is insufficient to search for and acquire the target. The seekers also suffer from relatively high ambient noise, both electronically and in the optical portion; they are therefore inefficient in blocking bright sunlight. Illuminated image-tracking and -sensing devices suffer from the same difficulties.
The Compound Eye Laser Tracking devices of the subject invention is a tracking system used to guide items to strike a laser-illuminated target. The laser illuminator is modeled as a short-pulse laser operating at 1.064 μm, operating at a repetition rate of at least 100 Hz. The tracking device accurately tracks the illuminated spot even when the direction of the sun is very close to the direction to the illuminated spot, and initially finds the illuminated spot in a 50° cone field of view (FOV). The final tracking device fits within a cylinder whose diameter is 2.75 in. (70 mm) and whose length is roughly 6 in. (150 mm), and it does not require moving parts. The tracking device output is two dc voltages, one to guide the item in elevation, the other in azimuth.
The subject invention includes a method of tracking an optical signal in the presence of optical noise, having the steps of collecting a signal with a lens array, filtering the signal to select specific wavelengths or wavelength ranges, filtering the signal to limit the angular field of view of each lens, directing the signal to one or more photodetectors, and processing the output(s) of the photodetector(s) so that signals are produced which describe the angular difference between the pointing direction of the signal and the pointing direction of the tracking device. The lens array may be mounted to a curved surface and is biometrically inspired.
The Compound Eye Laser Tracking Device of the subject invention not only tracks illumination signals, it can also generate position sensitive data that can be processed to calculate azimuth and elevation corrections. This data can also be used for angle measurement, parallax, and multipoint coordination. Thus, One may locate the target in three dimensions; One may use the measurement to align several objects together and keep them in the same relative positions (such as constellations of satellites or groups of aircraft); further, one may use the measurement to keep a line of vehicles separated at constant distances (such as convoys of self-driving trucks), and thus avoid collisions.
Further, a holographic system may be used as a spectral and/or angular filter and may be a substrate-guided holographic filter. The method of directing the optical signal to one or more photodetectors may be by an optical fiber bundle, and can be a light guide. Filtering the signal to limit the angular field of view may involve the light guide which may select specific wavelengths with an optical bandpass filter, may be formed from a combination of a shortpass filter and a longpass filter. The photodetector can be a single detector whose output indicates the position of the light on the detector and may be a plurality of detectors. The electronics may include noise filtering. The electrical output signal may be analog or digital.
The subject invention resolves these issues, being an innovative wide field-of-view, compound eye, laser illumination seeker (10), based on multiaperture compound receiver optics (MACRO) with a spectral and angle filter. CELIS includes a MACRO, made of a lens array 30 aligned with a light-guide array 25, an angle filter 15, a spectral filter 15, a set of detectors 20 (typically four), and electronics and software
The subject invention uses angular- and spectrally-selective filters, which eliminate the interference of solar light and allow simple integration with a quad detector 50, a position detector, or several individual detectors, resulting in a compact device package that can be easily implemented within a small volume. A substrate-guided holographic (SGH) relay 45 can be used as a combined angular and spectral filter. The SGH comprises two holographic optical element (HOE) lenses integrated on a flat glass substrate The two HOE lenses can be fabricated in a holographic photopolymer film and can offer over 80% throughput (diffraction efficiency) with an out-of-band rejection ratio about 60 dB or OD 6. Only photons that satisfy both the Bragg wavelength and Bragg angle simultaneously are diffracted by the SGH filter and reach the detector. Other photons that have different incident angles or wavelengths, such as bright sunlight, are rejected by the SGH filter, and will not reach the detector; thus, a low noise and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be achieved. If the SGH filter is not included, separate angle and spectral filters must be used. The angle filter can be, for example, a light guide design that restricts the FOV of each lens of the MACRO. The spectral filter can be, for example, a narrowband interference filter.
An example implementation is configured to guide a missile to a designated target. This CELIS example includes a MACRO with a plurality of lenses 35. Each lens has a small FOV (6.25° in this example). The lenses are arranged on a surface that is curved so that the withal to the center of each lens is pointed in the direction, relative to the other lenses, of its portion of the CELIS FOV. The lenses are arrayed in quadrants, aligned to the direction change capabilities of the missile (for example, up-left, up-right, down-left, and down-right to provide azimuth and elevation signals). The individual lens FOVs are tiled in such a way as to cover the entire CELIS FOV. In this example, with each lens covering 6.25° and the CELIS FOV being 50° full cone angle, the diameter of the MACRO will contain eight lenses. To fill a CELIS FOV of 50° full cone angle, a total of 52 lenses are required in this example (
In this example, all the light received by an individual quadrant is collected by a set of light guides or fiber bundles 45. The configuration of the light guide or fiber bundle restricts the individual lens FOV to its designated 6.25° section. The light from the 13 lenses in each 25° pie-shaped quadrant is combined into a single output. The light then passes through a spectral filter 50, which is an SGH in this example, and is directed to a single detector covering that quadrant. Comparison of the responses of the responses of the four detectors, each representing one quadrant, are then compared to determine the correction values to be sent to the direction control electronics.
The MACRO is a multilens array mounted on a curved surface, where the angular deviation of each lens from the center of the MACRO FOV is such that the lens is pointing exactly in the direction centered in the lens FOV assigned to that lens. This results in a significant reduction in aberration when compared to an individual lens with the diameter and FOV of the MACRO. In addition, since the MACRO uses thinner lenses than an individual lens with the same size and MACRO FOV, it is much lighter than an individual lens.
When two devices of the subject invention are used, the azimuth and elevation correction values generated by the tracking software can be reinterpreted, based on their values, as the two-dimensional angle between (a) a line from the tracker to the illumination spot and (b) a line defined by the center angle of the tracker's field of regard (FOR). This angle can then be used for many other purposes, including proportional navigation (ProNav), as well as simply describing the location of the spot in tracker-oriented space. Furthermore, two such units, separated by a known distance and with a known value of relative alignment, can use parallax to add a distance measurement, thereby locating the spot in three dimensions. This three-dimensional position knowledge can be used for more accurate tracking or for maintaining a specific distance between the tracker and the spot, as well as simply improving the knowledge of the spot's location in space.
There are many advantages to using the angular measurements of the tracker directly, rather than only for line-of-sight tracking. ProNav, for example, requires an angle between the direction of motion of the tracker and the location of the spot it is tracking. It would potentially be possible to located more than one spot using a single tracker. Combining two such trackers to create a three-dimensional location of the spot is even better, making it possible to improve the accuracy of the tracker's motion, such as on a missile or on a landing spacecraft. The distance value can be used to keep the tracker in a specific location with respect to the spot. This can be used for coordinating swarms of spacecraft, keeping aircraft in precise locations compared to each other, and keeping a vehicle in a convoy at a specified location with respect to a spot on another vehicle in the convoy.
This exploitation of tracking technology can be very accurate, yet relatively inexpensive. A vehicle convoy can be protected against mutual collisions without the need for a new radar or ladar system, either of which will be more expensive than this application of the tracker measurements. Thus, with a combination of two or more units of the subject invention, in which the signals describing the angles between each tracking device and the target are interpreted specifically as angles; the distances between each pair of units is known; the combination of the measured angles and known distances between units is interpreted as a parallax measurement; then the parallax measurement may be used to determine the distance to the target.
Further, the distances and angles may be combined to define the target location in three dimensions. The distance to the target may be used to control the distance between the tracking device and a known source. With the method of the subject invention the known source may be moving, and it may be used for situational awareness to prevent a collision between the tracking device and the target.
In addition, the method of the subject invention may be used for situational awareness to keep two or more units in constant positions relative to each other
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention and that the invention is not limited to the specific forms shown or described herein. Various modifications may be made in the design, arrangement, and type of elements disclosed herein, as well as the steps of making and using the invention without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4094577 | Spitz | Jun 1978 | A |
4286760 | Couderc | Sep 1981 | A |
4479717 | Cornillault | Oct 1984 | A |
4585948 | Schneider | Apr 1986 | A |
4625108 | Nestel | Nov 1986 | A |
4674874 | Halldorsson | Jun 1987 | A |
4778990 | Laughlin | Oct 1988 | A |
4893025 | Lee | Jan 1990 | A |
4965453 | Hoschette | Oct 1990 | A |
5008543 | Bertrand | Apr 1991 | A |
5015844 | Cole | May 1991 | A |
5023440 | Kuppenheimer, Jr. | Jun 1991 | A |
5243179 | Bjorkman | Sep 1993 | A |
5517019 | Lopez | May 1996 | A |
5606434 | Feldman | Feb 1997 | A |
5920337 | Glassman | Jul 1999 | A |
6429954 | Kasai | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6507392 | Richards | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6987258 | Mates | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7185845 | Hartman | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7276681 | Alexander | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286295 | Sweatt | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7587109 | Reininger | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7742151 | Krasutsky | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7839550 | Billmers | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8259291 | Taylor | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8427657 | Milanovi | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8766808 | Hogasten | Jul 2014 | B2 |
10281551 | Ai | May 2019 | B2 |
20020031295 | Sasaki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20050093757 | Kiernan, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050279917 | Barrett | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060236721 | Franck | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070237490 | Reininger | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090314929 | Lee | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001119 | Lindgren | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110174917 | Dold | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120001058 | Luke | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013967 | Kim | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20140117260 | Woida-O'Brien | May 2014 | A1 |
20140231650 | Streuber | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140312161 | Ell | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150015701 | Yu | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150177381 | Yap | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150253111 | Caplan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150268345 | Ell | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150325723 | Shi | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150362651 | Voloschenko et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377590 | Roncone | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160161587 | Caplan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160185447 | Miralles | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160216075 | Trail | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160291115 | Ai et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160291442 | Ai | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170041534 | Xia | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170102264 | Harder | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180188685 | Dimov et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200378725 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62140191 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15085662 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16405494 | US |