Compound waveform gasket for low closure force EMI shielding applications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6348654
  • Patent Number
    6,348,654
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 12, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 19, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A resilient EMI shielding and/or environmental sealing gasket for interposition between a first interface surface and an oppositely-disposed second interface surface. The gasket is formed of an elongate body of indefinite length which extends along a longitudinal axis. The body includes base and apex surfaces, and opposing first and second lateral surfaces which extend intermediate the base and apex surfaces. The base surface itself extends along the length the body as configured for proximally supporting the gasket on the first interface surface. The apex surface, in turn, extends radially from the longitudinal axis for distal contact with the second interface surface, and further extends along the longitudinal axis as defining a first waveform profile characterized as having a first periodic series of alternating first high and low amplitude intervals. The second lateral surface also extends along the longitudinal axis as defining a second waveform profile which is disposed generally transverse to the first waveform profile and which is similarly characterized as having a second periodic series of alternating second high and low amplitude intervals. The gasket so formed is deformable under a predetermined compressive force between the first and second interface surfaces into a stressed orientation characterized in that the body is deflected intermediate the base and apex surfaces.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates broadly to gaskets for providing environmental sealing and/or electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, and particularly to a low closure force EMI shielding gasket which is especially adapted for use within small electronics enclosures such as cellular phone handsets and other handheld electronic devices.




The operation of electronic devices such as televisions, radios, computers, medical instruments, business machines, communications equipment, and the like is attended by the generation of electromagnetic radiation within the electronic circuitry of the equipment. As is detailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,202,536; 5,142,101; 5,105,056; 5,028,739; 4,952,448; and 4,857,668, such radiation often develops as a field or as transients within the radio frequency band of the electromagnetic spectrum, i.e., between about 10 KHz and 10 GHz, and is termed “electromagnetic interference” or “EMI” as being known to interfere with the operation of other proximate electronic devices.




To attenuate EMI effects, shielding having the capability of absorbing and/or reflecting EMI energy may be employed both to confine the EMI energy within a source device, and to insulate that device or other “target” devices from other source devices. Such shielding is provided as a barrier which is inserted between the source and the other devices, and typically is configured as an electrically conductive and grounded housing which encloses the device. As the circuitry of the device generally must remain accessible for servicing or the like, most housings are provided with openable or removable accesses such as doors, hatches, panels, or covers. Between even the flattest of these accesses and its corresponding mating or faying surface, however, there may be present gaps which reduce the efficiency of the shielding by presenting openings through which radiant energy may leak or otherwise pass into or out of the device. Moreover, such gaps represent discontinuities in the surface and ground conductivity of the housing or other shielding, and may even generate a secondary source of EMI radiation by functioning as a form of slot antenna. In this regard, bulk or surface currents induced within the housing develop voltage gradients across any interface gaps in the shielding, which gaps thereby function as antennas which radiate EMI noise. In general, the amplitude of the noise is proportional to the gap length, with the width of the gap having less appreciable effect.




For filling gaps within mating surfaces of housings and other EMI shielding structures, gaskets and other seals have been proposed both for maintaining electrical continuity across the structure, and for excluding from the interior of the device such contaminates as moisture and dust. Such seals are bonded or mechanically attached to, or press-fit into, one of the mating surfaces, and function to close any interface gaps to establish a continuous conductive path thereacross by conforming under an applied pressure to irregularities between the surfaces. Accordingly, seals intended for EMI shielding applications are specified to be of a construction which not only provides electrical surface conductivity even while under compression, but which also has a resiliency allowing the seals to conform to the size of the gap. The seals additionally must be wear resistant, economical to manufacture, and capability of withstanding repeated compression and relaxation cycles. For further information on specifications for EMI shielding gaskets, reference may be had to Severinsen, J., “Gaskets That Block EMI,” Machine Design, Vol. 47, No. 19, pp. 74-77 (Aug. 7, 1975).




EMI shielding gaskets typically are constructed as a resilient core element having gap-filling capabilities which is either filled, sheathed, or coated with an electrically conductive element. The resilient core element, which may be foamed or unfoamed, solid or tubular, typically is formed of an elastomeric thermoplastic material such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, or a polypropylene-EPDM blend, or a thermoplastic or thermosetting rubber such as a butadiene, styrene-butadiene, nitrile, chlorosulfonate, neoprene, urethane, or silicone rubber.




Conductive materials for the filler, sheathing, or coating include metal or metal-plated particles, fabrics, meshes, and fibers. Preferred metals include copper, nickel, silver, aluminum, tin or an alloy such as Monel, with preferred fibers and fabrics including natural or synthetic fibers such as cotton, wool, silk, cellulose, polyester, polyamide, nylon, polyimide. Alternatively, other conductive particles and fibers such as carbon, graphite, or a conductive polymer material may be substituted.




Conventional manufacturing processes for EMI shielding gaskets include extrusion, molding, or die-cutting, with molding or die-cutting heretofore being preferred for particularly small or complex shielding configurations. In this regard, die-cutting involves the forming of the gasket from a cured sheet of an electrically-conductive elastomer which is cut or stamped using a die or the like into the desired configuration. Molding, in turn, involves the compression or injection molding of an uncured or thermoplastic elastomer into the desired configuration.




More recently, a form-in-place (FIP) process has been proposed for the manufacture of EMI shielding gaskets. As is described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,096,413; 5,910,524; and 5,641,438, and PCT Application WO 96/22672; and in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,882,729 and 5,731,541; and Japanese Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 7177/1993, such process involves the application of a bead of a viscous, curable, electrically-conductive composition which is dispensed in a fluent state from a nozzle directly onto to a surface of a substrate such as a housing or other enclosure. The composition, typically a silver-filled or otherwise electrically-conductive silicone elastomer, then is cured-in-place via the application of heat or with atmospheric moisture or ultraviolet (UV) radiation to form an electrically-conductive, elastomeric EMI shielding gasket in situ on the substrate surface.




Another recent EMI shielding solution for electronics enclosures, which solution is further described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,566,055 and in DE 19728839 involves the over-molding of the housing or cover with an conductive elastomer. The elastomer is integrally molded in a relatively thin layer across the inside surface of the housing or cover, and in a relatively thicker layer along the interface locations thereof providing both a gasket-like response for environmentally sealing the cover to the housing and electrical continuity for the EMI shielding of the enclosure. The elastomer additionally may be molded onto interior partitions of the cover or housing, or itself molded to integrally-form such partitions, providing electromagneticly-isolated compartments between potentially interfering circuitry components. Covers of such type are marketed commercially under the name Cho-Shield® Cover by the Chomerics EMC Division of Parker-Hannifin Corporation (Woburn, Mass.).




Yet another solution for shielding electronics enclosures, and particularly the smaller enclosures typical of cellular phone handsets and other handheld electronic devices, concerns the incorporation of a thin plastic retainer or frame as a supporting member of the gasket. As is described in commonly-assigned, co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 08/377,412 filed Jan. 24, 1995, the electrically conductive elastomer may be molded or, as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,541, formed-in-place or otherwise attached to the inner or inner peripheral edge surfaces and/or to the upper or lower face surfaces of the frame. So constructed, the gasket and frame assembly may be integrated within the electronic device to provide a low impedance pathway between, for example, peripheral ground traces on a printed circuit board (PCB) of the device, and other components thereof such as the conductive coating of a plastic housing, another PCB, or a keypad assembly. Uses for the spacer gaskets of the type herein include EMI shielding applications within digital cellular, handyphone, and personal communications services (PCS) handsets, PC cards (PCMCIA cards), global positioning systems (GPS), radio receivers, and other handheld devices such as personal digital assistants (PDAs). Other uses include as replacements for metal EMI shielding “fences” on PCBs in wireless telecommunication devices.




Requirements for typical small enclosure applications generally specify a low impedance, low profile connection which is deflectable under relatively low closure force loads, e.g., about 1.0-8.0 lbs per inch (0.2-1.5 kg per cm) of gasket length. Usually, a minimum deflection, typically of about 10%, also is specified to ensure that the gasket sufficiently conforms to the mating housing or board surfaces to develop an electrically conductive pathway therebetween. It has been observed that for certain applications, however, that the closure or other deflection force required to effect the specified minimum deflection of conventional profiles may be higher than can be accommodated by the particular housing or board assembly design.




One method of achieving a lower closure force gasket design particularly adapted for use in smaller electronic enclosure packages has been to form the gasket as having a periodic “interrupted” pattern of alternating local maxima and minima heights. Conventionally, and as is described in commonly-assigned, co-pending applications U.S. Ser. No. 09/042,135, filed Mar. 13, 1998, and U.S. Ser. No. 60/183,395, filed Feb. 18, 2000, in the Technical Publication “EMI Shielding and Grounding Spacer Gasket,” Parker Chomerics Division, Woburn, Mass. (1996), and in PCT application 98/54942, gaskets of such type may be formed by molding or the FIP process as having a crenelated, i.e., notched, serrated, or a sinusoidal “waveform” profile, or as a series of discrete beads. In general, for a specified joint configuration, a gasket having such an “interrupted” profile or pattern would be expected to exhibit a greater deflection under a given compressive load than a continuous profile.




A commercial waveform gasket assembly representative of the existing state of the art is shown generally at


1


in the perspective view of FIG.


1


and in the top view of

FIG. 2

as including a length of electrically-conductive, elastomeric gasket


2


, which may be formulated as a silver or silver-plated-filled silicone or fluorosilicone material, which is bonded by injection or compression molding along a landed edge, referenced at


3


in

FIG. 1

, of a housing


4


. Housing


4


may be formed of a plastic material such as ABS, polycarbonate, nylon, polyester, polyetherimide, a liquid crystal polymer (LCP), or the like which is provided with a metallized coating to render the interior surface,


5


, thereof electrically-conductive. Alternatively, housing


4


may be formed of a relatively lightweight metal such as magnesium or aluminum.




In basic geometry, the distal edge,


6


, of gasket


2


assumes a generally sinusoidal profile. Functionally, the elastomeric gasket


2


deforms via a compression mode with the troughs of the waveform acting as compression stops. Such deformation response of gasket


2


is illustrated in FIG.


2


′ wherein a 3-D mesh model of a cross-section thereof is shown in phantom at


7


in an uncompressed or normal orientation which is superimposed over the deformed or stressed orientation referenced at


8


assumed upon the compression of gasket


2


between the edge surface


3


(not shown in FIG.


2


′) and a faying interface surface, represented by the plane referenced in phantom at


9


. As is confirmed in FIG.


2


′, gasket


2


exhibits a deformation response which is mainly in compression, with the darker areas of shading indicating regions of increasing compressive stress.




As the sizes of handheld electronic devices such as cellular phone handsets has continued to shrink, it will be appreciated that further improvements in the design of gaskets profiles therefor would be well-received by the electronics industry. Especially desired would be a low closure force gasket profile which is adapted for use in the smaller electronics enclosures which are increasingly becoming the industry standard.




BROAD STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a low closure force gasket for environmental sealing and/or electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding which is especially adapted for use in smaller electronic enclosure packages. As in conventional designs, the gasket of the present invention is configured as having an apex surface which is formed, relative to the housing or other substrate on which the base of the gasket may be supported, to exhibit a sinusoidal or other “waveform” profile to be responsive to lower closure force loads when compressed intermediate a pair of surfaces such as between two halves of a housing. However, the gasket of the invention further is configured, such as in having, for example, at least one lateral surface which is formed, relative to the apex surface, as a transverse waveform profile, to exhibit a controlled deflection response which may be characterized as a bending moment. Such response advantageously provides a large but controlled deflection affording a more uniform interface contact with the contacting surface for more assured electrical and physical continuity and, in turn, more reliable EMI shielding and environmental sealing effectiveness. When employed, for example, in electronics applications, the gasket of the invention therefore provides consistent EMI shielding and, additionally, environmental sealing effectiveness.




Advantages of the present invention therefore include the provision of an improved gasket profile for low closure force applications such as may be found in small, handheld electronic devices. Additional advantages includes a gasket profile which exhibits a controlled deflection response for more stable interface contact with the housing or circuit board components of the enclosure and, in turn, more assured electrical continuity and reliable EMI shielding effectiveness. These and other advantages will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art based upon the disclosure contained herein.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:





FIG. 1

is a perspective end view, partly in cross-section, of a portion of a housing for a handheld electronic communication device having molded on an edge thereof a “waveform” EMI shielding gasket representative of the prior art;





FIG. 2

is a top view of the housing of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is 3-D mesh model of a cross-section of the prior art waveform gasket of

FIG. 1

showing the compression response thereof;





FIG. 4

is a perspective view end view, partly in cross-section, of a portion of a representative EMI shielding assembly which includes a housing part along the edges of which is molded one embodiment of a combination waveform gasket in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a magnified view rotated 90° of the EMI shielding assembly of

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 6

is a further magnified view of the EMI shielding assembly of

FIG. 5

showing the cross-section of the waveform gasket of the present invention in enhanced detail;





FIG. 7

is 3-D mesh model of a cross-section of the waveform gasket of

FIG. 6

showing the deflection response thereof;





FIG. 8

is a plot comparing the force-deflection responses of the combination waveform gasket of

FIG. 7

according to the present invention to a similarly-dimensioned non-waveform gasket;





FIG. 9A

is a 3-D graphical representation of a finite element model of the predicted stress distribution at 0.020-inch (0.50 mm) deflection in a representative waveform gasket profile of the present invention;





FIG. 9B

is a 3-D graphical representation of the stress distributions of the gasket profile of

FIG. 9A

at 0.025-inch (0.635 mm) deflection;





FIG. 10A

is a 3-D graphical representation of a finite element model of the stress distributions at 0.020-inch (0.50 mm) deflection in an alternative embodiment of a waveform gasket profile of the present invention;





FIG. 10B

is a 3-D graphical representation of the stress distributions of the gasket profile of

FIG. 10A

at 0.025-inch (0.635 mm) deflection; and





FIG. 11

is a plot comparing the force-deflection responses of the combination waveform gasket of

FIG. 9

according to the present invention to the conventional waveform gasket of FIG.


1


.











The drawings will be described further in connection with the following Detailed Description of the Invention.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Certain terminology may be employed in the description to follow for convenience rather than for any limiting purpose. For example, the terms “forward,” “rearward,” “right,” “left,” “upper,” and “lower” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made, with the terms “inward,” “inner,” or “inboard” and “outward,” “outer,” or “outboard” referring, respectively, to directions toward and away from the center of the referenced element, and the terms “radial” and “axial” referring, respectively, to directions perpendicular and parallel to the central longitudinal axis of the referenced element. Terminology of similar import other than the words specifically mentioned above likewise is to be considered as being used for purposes of convenience rather than in any limiting sense.




In the figures, elements having an alphanumeric designation may be referenced herein collectively or in the alternative, as will be apparent from context, by the numeric portion of the designation only. Further, the constituent parts of various elements in the figures may be designated with separate reference numerals which shall be understood to refer to that constituent part of the element and not the element as a whole. General references, along with references to spaces, surfaces, dimensions, and extents, may be designated with arrows.




For the purposes of the discourse to follow, the precepts of the invention herein involved are described in connection with the molding or other application of an elastomeric, electrically-conductive, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding gasket onto an edge or other surface of one part of an enclosure for a handheld electronic device such as a cellular telephone. In view of the discourse to follow, however, it will be appreciated that aspects of the present invention may find utility in other EMI shielding applications, such as for spacer frame gaskets, circuit boards, or EMI shielding caps, or in non-electrically-conductive and/or thermally-conductive embodiments for environmental sealing and/or heat transfer applications. Use within those such other applications therefore should be considered to be expressly within the scope of the present invention.




Referring then to the figures, an exemplary sealing assembly for EMI shielding applications is shown generally at


10


in

FIG. 4

as including a housing part or other enclosure,


12


, for an electronic device which may be a cellular telephone or, alternatively another handheld or other electronic device such as a personal communications services (PCS) handset, PCMCIA card, global positioning system (GPS), radio receiver, personal digital assistant (PDA), or the like. Housing part


12


has an inner surface,


14


, and an outer surface,


16


, which extend to form sides walls, one of which is referenced at


18


, therebetween having a peripheral edge surface,


20


. Edge surface


20


functions as an interface surface with a faying edge or other interfacing surface of a mating housing part (not shown). For assuring the positive positioning of the mating parts, each of the parts may be formed as having one or more positioning pins, one of which is referenced at


22


on part


12


, receivable within a corresponding hole, such as the hole


24


of part


12


, provided in the mating housing part. Typically, the interior of the housing part


12


is divided into to more separate cavities, such as by an internal wall,


26


, for providing electromagnetically isolated compartments between potentially interfering circuitry.




For many applications, housing part


12


may be injection or otherwise molded of a thermoplastic or other polymeric material such as a poly(ether ether ketone), polyimide, high molecular weight polyethylene, polypropylene, polyetherimide, polybutylene terephthalate, nylon, fluoropolymer, polysulfone, polyester, ABS, acetal homo or copolymer, or a liquid crystal polymer. In the case of an electrically-nonconductive material, the housing part inner surface


14


may be painted, metallized, or otherwise provided with a metal or metal-filled coating layer. Alternatively, housing part


12


may be formed of a relatively lightweight metal such as magnesium or aluminum.




As may be seen with additional reference to the magnified views of

FIGS. 5 and 6

, a resilient gasket, the constitute segments of which are referenced at


30




a-d


, is molded or otherwise retained, such as by adhesive bonding or an interference fit, on side wall


18


and optionally, internal wall


26


, to be compressible axially under a predetermined compressive load intermediate edge surface


20


and the corresponding surface of the mating housing part (not shown in FIGS.


4


-


6


). In this regard, gasket


30


preferably is overmolded onto the sidewall edge surface


20


by injection or compression molding as formed of an elastomeric material which specifically may be selected for temperature, chemical, or physical compatibility with the housing material. Depending then upon the application, suitable materials may include natural rubbers such as Hevea, as well as thermoplastic, i.e., melt-processible, or thermosetting, i.e., vulcanizable, synthetic rubbers such as fluoropolymers, chlorosulfonate, polybutadiene, polybutadiene, buna-N, butyl, neoprene, nitrile, polyisoprene, silicone, fluorosilicone, copolymer rubbers such as ethylene-propylene (EPR), ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM), nitrile-butadiene (NBR) and styrene-butadiene (SBR), or blends such as ethylene or propylene-EPDM, EPR, or NBR. The term “synthetic rubbers” also should be understood to encompass materials which alternatively may be classified broadly as thermoplastic or thermosetting elastomers such as polyurethanes, silicones, fluorosilicones, styrene-isoprene-styrene (SIS), and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), as well as other polymers which exhibit rubber-like properties such as plasticized nylons, polyesters, ethylene vinyl acetates, and polyvinyl chlorides. As used herein, the term “elastomeric” is ascribed its conventional meaning of exhibiting rubber-like properties of compliancy, resiliency or compression deflection, low compression set, flexibility, and an ability to recover after deformation.




Preferably for EMI shielding applications, the elastomeric material is selected to be a silicone or fluorosilicone material. In general, silicone elastomers exhibit desirable properties such as thermal and oxidation resistance over a wide temperature range, as well as resistance to many chemicals and to weather effects. These materials further exhibit excellent electrical properties including resistance to corona breakdown over a wide range of temperatures and humidity.




For EMI shielding applications, the silicone or other elastomeric material may be rendered electrically conductive for providing an electrically conductive pathway between the interfacing surfaces via the loading of a continuous binder phase of the material with an electrically-conductive filler. Suitable electrically-conductive fillers include nickel and nickel-plated substrates such as graphite and noble metals, and silver and silver-plated substrates such as: pure silver; silver-plated noble metals such as silver-plated gold; silver-plated non-noble metals such as silver-plated copper, nickel, aluminum, and tin; and silver-plated glass, ceramics, plastics, elastomers, and mica; and mixtures thereof. The shape of the filler is not considered critical to the present invention, and may include any shape that is conventionally involved in the manufacture or formulation of conductive materials of the type herein involved including solid spheres, hollow microspheres, elastomeric balloons, flakes, platelets, fibers, rods, or irregularly-shaped particles. Similarly, the particle size of the filler is not considered critical, but generally will be in the range of from about 0.250-250 μm, with a range of from about 0.250-75 μm being preferred.




The filler is loaded in the composition in a proportion sufficient to provide the level of electrical conductivity and EMI shielding effectiveness in the cured gasket which is desired for the intended application. For most applications, an EMI shielding effectiveness of at least 10 dB, and preferably at least 20 dB, and most preferably at least 100 dB or higher, over a frequency range of from about 10 MHz to 12 GHz is considered acceptable. Such effectiveness translates to a filler proportion which generally is between about 10-80% by volume, based on the total volume of the reaction system, and preferably is between about 20-70% by volume. As is known, however, the ultimate shielding effectiveness of the cured gasket will vary based on the amount of electrically-conductive material in the filler and the imposed load or deflection, typically between about 10-50%, of the gasket.




Alternatively, the electrically conductive filler may be provided as a relatively thin, i.e., 1-10 mils (0.025-0.25 mm), plating or coating layer covering gasket


30


. In the case of a coating, such layer may be formulated as a silicone, fluorosilicone, or other elastomeric binder which forms a continuous phase within which the filler is dispersed.




Returning to

FIGS. 4-6

, it may be seen that in the uncompressed or normal state shown, the constituent segments


30




a-b


of gasket


30


each is formed as an elongate body


40


, of an indefinite length which extends along a longitudinal axis, which axis is shown as the central axis commonly referenced at


42


for the gasket segments


30




a


and


30




b


. Depending upon the configuration of housing part


12


, gasket


30


and, accordingly, body


40


thereof may be continuous or discontinuous, and may trace a linear, curved, rectilinear, curvilinear, or other shape path along longitudinal axis


42


.




With particular reference to the magnified views of

FIGS. 5 and 6

, body


40


may be seen to be configured in accordance with the precepts of the present invention as having a compound waveform profile which effects a controlled deflection response in the gasket


30


. In basic construction, such profile includes a base or bottom surface,


50


, an apex or top surface,


52


, which defines the first waveform profile, a portion of which is referenced at


53


, of the gasket


30


, an inboard lateral surface,


54


, and an outboard lateral surface,


56


, which is disposed opposite the inboard lateral surface


54


and which defines the second waveform profile of the gasket. As may be seen, all of the surfaces


50


,


52


,


54


, and


56


may be integrally formed within body


40


.




Base surface


50


in the illustrated configuration of gasket


30


is generally planar and extends generally parallel to the housing part edge surface


20


along the length of the gasket body


40


. With gasket


30


being molded or otherwise bonded or attached to the edge surface


20


, base surface


50


thereby proximal supports the gasket on the surface


20


for compression therebetween and the faying interface surface (not show in

FIGS. 5 and 6

) of, for example, the mating housing part. Depending, however, on the geometry or orientation of the edge surface


20


, base surface


50


alternatively may be configured, for example, as being beveled or chamfered to correspond to any beveling or chamfering of the inboard corner


60


of surface


20


. Moreover in the illustrative embodiment of

FIGS. 5 and 6

, base surface


50


further is formed as having an extension portion, which may be best seen in phantom at


62


in

FIG. 6

, depending therefrom, that is bonded or otherwise secured to the inner surface


14


of the side wall


18


. It will be understood that extension portion


62


provides additional surface area as well as a shear surface attachment for further securing, such as by self-adhesive molding or adhesive bonding, the gasket body


40


to the housing part


12


.




Apex surface


52


extends radially from longitudinal axis


42


as spaced-apart from base surface


50


for distal contact with the faying interface surface (not shown). In the illustrated embodiment of

FIGS. 5 and 6

, apex surface


52


defines the first waveform profile


53


of gasket


30


as extending along longitudinal axis


42


in a first periodic series of alternating first high amplitude intervals or crests, one of which is referenced at


70


, and first low amplitude intervals or troughs, one of which is referenced at


72


. The first waveform profile


53


defined by apex surface


52


may be of any pattern, such as square-wave, ramp, or sawtooth, but in the illustrated embodiment of

FIG. 6

is shown to generally be sinusodial and as having a given, preferably constant, wavelength, referenced at λ


1


, which may be between about 0.01-0.50 inches (0.25-12.7 mm) for many applications, and a crest height, h, or double wave amplitude, which may be between about 0.005-0.50 inches (0.13-12.7 mm). For EMI shielding applications, wavelength λ


1


, and accordingly the gaps between the crests


70


, may be sized with respect to the wavelength of the incident EMI radiation, such as less than about ¼ of that wavelength for frequencies in the range of 10 MHz-10 GHz, to maintain the required level of EMI shielding. Moreover for EMI shielding applications, it is preferred that a minimum electrical resistivity, typically about 0.1 Ω or less, is maintained per unit length of the gasket


30


.




Inboard lateral surface


54


extends intermediate the base and apex surfaces


50


and


52


in forming one side of the gasket body


40


. With the other side of the gasket body


40


being formed by the outboard lateral surface


56


, a widthwise extent, referenced at w in

FIG. 6

, of the apex surface


52


is defined therebetween which, for ease of manufacturing the mold or other tooling for gasket


30


via a CNC or wirecut EDM process, may be maintained as generally constant. For assisting in the control of the deflection of the gasket


30


in the manner to be described hereinafter, inboard lateral surface


54


may be configured so as to assume a generally concave profile along axis longitudinal axis


42


intermediate the base and apex surfaces


50


and


52


in having a radius of curvature, referenced at r, in

FIG. 6

, about the axis


74


which extends generally parallel to longitudinal axis


42


. Radius r


1


typically may be between about 0.002-0.20 inches (0.05-5.8 mm) for may of the applications herein involved.




Outboard lateral surface


56


, in turn, similarly extends intermediate the base surface and apex surfaces


50


and


52


opposite the inboard lateral surface


54


. As may be seen with reference to the enhanced view of

FIG. 6

, outboard lateral surface


56


preferably is inclined along axis


76


from the base surface


50


to the apex surface


52


in the direction of the inboard lateral surface


54


so as to form an acute angle, referenced at θ, with a vertical axis,


78


. Such inclination of the lateral surface


56


further assists in the controlled deflection of the gasket


30


as will be described hereinafter.




In accordance with the precepts of the present invention, outboard lateral surface


56


is configured as defining a second waveform profile of the gasket


30


. As may be seen best in

FIG. 5

, such profile, referenced generally at


80


in

FIG. 5

, is disposed generally transverse to the first waveform profile


53


of apex surface


52


and extends along longitudinal axis


42


in a second periodic series of alternating second high amplitude intervals or crests, one of which is referenced at


82


in

FIG. 5

, and second low amplitude intervals or troughs, one of which is referenced at


84


in FIG.


5


. The second waveform profile


80


defined by outboard lateral surface


56


again may be of any pattern, such as square-wave, ramp, or sawtooth, and may be the same as or different from the pattern of the first waveform


53


profile of apex surface


52


. In the illustrated embodiment of

FIG. 5

, however, the second waveform profile


80


is also shown to be generally sinusoidal in having a convex curvature, such as about a central inclined axis,


86


, in the direction indicated by arrow


88


intermediate each successive pair of troughs


84


. Each such trough pair also defines a preferably constant wavelength, referenced at λ


2


, therebetween which, in the embodiment of

FIG. 5

is about equal to λ


1


(

FIG. 6

) of the first waveform profile


53


. Preferably, each crest


82


of the second waveform profile


80


is in registration with a corresponding crest


70


of the first waveform profile


53


, and each trough


84


of the second waveform profile


80


is in registration with a corresponding trough


72


of the first waveform profile


53


such the first and second waveform profiles are generally in phase along longitudinal axis


42


.




By virtue of the provision of a combination of waveform profiles, gasket


30


of the invention is thereby made to exhibit a controlled deflection response when deformed under an axially-directed force between, for example, the edge surface


20


of housing part


12


and a faying interface surface from a mating housing part or other component. Such deformation response of gasket


30


is illustrated in

FIG. 7

wherein a 3-D mesh model of a cross-section of gasket


30


is shown in phantom at


90


in an uncompressed or normal orientation which is superimposed over the deformed or stressed orientation referenced at


92


assumed upon the compression of gasket


30


between the interfacing surfaces


94


and


96


. As may be seen in

FIG. 7

, the controlled deflection response


92


of gasket


30


is characterized in that the gasket body


40


is angularly deflected, i.e., bent or folded, intermediate the base and apex surfaces


50


and


52


thereof about a corresponding bending or moment arm in the radial direction referenced by arrow


98


. The darker areas of shading in the figure indicate regions of increasing compressive stress.




Advantageously, it has been observed that the provision of such bending mechanism may reduce the load required to effect a given deflection of the gasket


30


by up to about 50% or more as compared to the deflection attainable through the compression of the gasket alone. That is, for a given compressive load, the axial deflection of the gasket


30


according to the present invention may be more than twice the deflection of a gasket of conventional design which does not exhibit the described bending moment. For example, under a compressive load of about 1.0-4.0 lb


f


/in (0.2-0.8 kg/cm) in a typical application, the gasket of the invention may be deflected by at least about 0.006-0.015 inch (0.15-0.4 mm). The effects of a non-waveform and combination waveform gasket configuration are compared graphically at


100


in FIG.


8


. In

FIG. 8

, normalized load-deflection curves are plotted at


102


and


104


as functions of total load force along the axis designated


106


and deflection displacement along the axis designated


108


for unit lengths of, respectively, the combination waveform gasket profile of

FIG. 7

(curve


102


), and a comparably dimensioned, i.e., equal top and bottom widths and height, non-waveform profile (curve


104


).




From the results of

FIG. 8

, it may be seen that within a given application, the force required to deflect an combination waveform design will be lower than for a comparable continuous design. Accordingly, it will be appreciated that the gasket of the present invention is especially adapted for use in EMI shielding applications, such as in communication handsets and other handheld devices, which specify a low closure force shielding solution. Indeed, by virtue of the deflection of the gasket, increased surface area contact may be developed between the gasket and the interfacing surface for improved electrical continuity.




The combination waveform design of the present invention, moreover, allows for the direction of the gasket deflection to be changed depending upon the requirements of the particular application. For example, in the assembly


10


of

FIGS. 4-6

, the direction the deflection of gasket


30


will be inboard, i.e., towards the interior of housing part


12


. Alternatively, by reversing the configuration of the lateral surfaces


54


and


56


, the deflection of gasket


30


may be outboard, i.e., towards the exterior of housing part


12


. Such capability affords greater flexibility in the design of the enclosure. Indeed, although gasket


30


is shown in

FIGS. 4-6

to be configured to be supported on one edge surface of the enclosure, it is to be understood that the gasket may be made symmetrical, i.e., with two confronting base surfaces


50


and two oppositely-disposed apex surfaces


52


so as to be supportable on opposing sides of a substrate such as the spacer gasket frames further described in commonly-assigned, co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 08/377,412 filed Jan. 24, 1995, and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,541.




The Example to follow is illustrative of the practicing and unique features of the invention herein involved, but should not be construed in any limiting sense.




EXAMPLE




To confirm the precepts of the present invention, the static load-deflection responses of two gasket profiles configured in accordance with the invention were predicted using a nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling program, MARC K6 (MARC Analysis Research Corp., Palo Alto, Calif.). The results for the gasket profiles identified at


200


in

FIGS. 9A and 9B

and at


300


in

FIGS. 10A and 10B

are plotted for the second component of Cauchy stress at a deflection of 0.020 inch (0.50 mm) for

FIGS. 9A and 10A

and 0.025 inch (0.635 mm ) for

FIGS. 9B and 10B

. The profiles were modeled using eight-node 3-D Hermann elements which are represented by the grid lines commonly referenced at


400


.




The compression of the profiles


200


and


300


was simulated using a contact element which is shown as the plane commonly referenced at


502


. The opposing edge surface (not shown) was considered in the analysis as a rigid body relative to the gasket profiles. Profile


300


of

FIGS. 10A and 10B

may be seen to differ from profile


200


of

FIGS. 9A and 9B

essentially in having a base surface


50


which includes an angled portion,


302


, for supporting the profile


300


on a correspondingly chamfered edge surface.




Based upon the above models, the load-deflection responses of the gasket profiles were predicted by finite element analysis using the Mooney-Rivlin strain energy function,






W=C


1


(I


1


−3)+C


2


(I


2


−3)  (1)






where C


1


, C


2


, are material coefficients, and I


1


, I


2


are strain invariants, which reduces to the Ogden function,









W
=




i
=
1

m





μ





i


α





i




(


λ
1

α





i


+

λ
2

α





i


+

λ
2

α





i


-
3

)







(
2
)













where λ


1


, λ


2


, λ


3


are the stretch ratios and α


i


, μ


i


are the material coefficients. For a two-term Ogden model, i.e., m=2, Eqs. 1 and 2 are equivalent. Table 1 summarizes the two-term Ogden constants and the bulk modulus, which was used to account for the near incompressibility of elastomeric materials, of a representative silicone-based, filled elastomeric molding material.












TABLE 1









Representative Ogden Model Material Constants




























Bulk Modulus




K =




200,000




psi







Ogden Constants




μ


1


=




−173




psi








μ


2


=




−522




psi








α


1


=




2








α


2


=




−2















In the FEA models of

FIGS. 9 and 10

, the predicted stress component distribution in the vertical direction are shown by contour shading with the darker areas indicating regions of increasing compressive stress. The bending mechanism responses of the profiles may be seen to appreciably reduce the force required to deflect the gasket. Of course, based on the foregoing simulations, gasket geometries other that those shown in

FIGS. 8 and 9

may be envisioned which incorporate this bending mechanism feature. These other geometries therefore are to be considered to be within the scope of the present invention.




Quantitatively, the effect of the described bending response is modeled at


600


in

FIG. 11

wherein normalized load force (axis


602


) versus deflection (axis


604


) curves are plotted for unit lengths of the combination waveform gasket profile of

FIG. 9

(curve


606


) and the conventional, i.e., without bending, waveform profile of

FIG. 1

(curve


608


). The respective gasket profiles used for the models were comparably dimensioned as having equal top and bottom widths and equal heights.




From

FIG. 11

, it may be seen that the provision of the described bending mechanism may reduce the load required to effect a given deflection of a waveform gasket by up to about 50% or more as compared to the deflection attainable through the compression of the gasket alone. That is, for a given compressive load, the axial deflection of the combination waveform gasket according to the present invention (curve


606


) may be more than twice the deflection of a gasket of conventional design (curve


608


) which does not exhibit the described bending moment. For example, under a compressive load of about 1.0-2.0 lb


f


/in (0.2-0.4 kg/cm) which typically is specified for miniature electronic devices or other very low closure force applications, the combination waveform gasket of the invention may be deflected by at least about 0.03-0.035 inch (0.76-0.89 mm) as compared to only about 0.01-0.015 inch (0.25-0.38 mm) for the conventional profile. It will be appreciated that the bending mechanism response increases the range of deflection for the gasket profile of the present invention making it suitable for use in a variety of applications.




As it is anticipated that certain changes may be made in the present invention without departing from the precepts herein involved, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. All references cited herein are expressly incorporated by reference.



Claims
  • 1. A resilient gasket for interposition between a first interface surface and an oppositely-disposed second interface surface, said gasket comprising an elongate body of indefinite length which extends along a longitudinal axis, said body including:a base surface which extends along the length said body, said base surface being configured for proximally supporting said gasket on the first interface surface; an apex surface which extends radially from said longitudinal axis for distal contact with the second interface surface, said apex surface extending along said longitudinal axis as defining a first waveform profile characterized as having a first periodic series of alternating first high and low amplitude intervals; a first lateral surface extending intermediate said base surface and said apex surface; and a second lateral surface extending intermediate said base surface and said apex surface opposite said first lateral surface, whereby said gasket is deformable under a predetermined compressive force between the first and second interface surfaces into a stressed orientation characterized in that said body is deflected intermediate said base surface and said apex surface.
  • 2. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said second lateral surface extends along said longitudinal axis in defining a second waveform profile disposed generally transverse to said first waveform profile and characterized as having a second periodic series of alternating second high and low amplitude intervals.
  • 3. The gasket of claim 2 wherein the first high and low amplitude intervals of said first periodic series are generally in phase with the second high and low amplitude intervals of said second periodic series.
  • 4. The gasket of claim 2 wherein said second waveform profile is generally sinusoidal.
  • 5. The gasket of claim 2 wherein said first and said second waveform profile each is generally sinusoidal.
  • 6. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said body is generally curvilinear.
  • 7. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said first waveform profile is generally sinusoidal.
  • 8. The gasket of claim 1 wherein in said stressed orientation of said gasket said body is deflected towards said first lateral surface.
  • 9. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said body is generally rectilinear.
  • 10. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said first lateral surface is generally concave.
  • 11. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said second lateral surface is angled towards said first lateral surface.
  • 12. The gasket of claim 1 wherein said body is formed of an elastomeric polymeric material.
  • 13. The gasket of claim 12 wherein said polymeric material contains an electrically-conductive filler.
  • 14. A sealing assembly comprising:a first interface surface; and a resilient gasket compressible between said first interface surface and an oppositely-disposed second interface surface, said gasket comprising an elongate body of indefinite length which extends along a longitudinal axis, said body including: a base surface which extends along the length of said body, said base surface being proximally supported on said first interface surface; an apex surface which extends radially from said longitudinal axis for distal contact with the second interface surface, said apex surface extending along said first axis as defining a first waveform profile characterized as having a first periodic series of alternating first high and low amplitude intervals; a first lateral surface extending intermediate said base surface and said apex surface; and a second lateral surface extending intermediate said base surface and said apex surface opposite said first lateral surface, whereby said gasket is deformable under a predetermined compressive force between the first and second interface surfaces into a stressed orientation characterized in that said body is deflected intermediate said base surface and said apex surface.
  • 15. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said second lateral surface extends along said first axis as defining a second waveform profile disposed generally transverse to said first waveform profile and characterized as having a second periodic series of alternating second high and low amplitude intervals.
  • 16. The sealing assembly of claim 15 wherein the first high and low amplitude intervals of said first periodic series are generally in phase with the second high and low amplitude intervals of said second periodic series.
  • 17. The sealing assembly of claim 15 wherein said second waveform profile is generally sinusoidal.
  • 18. The sealing assembly of claim 15 wherein said first and said second waveform profile each is generally sinusoidal.
  • 19. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said body is generally curvilinear.
  • 20. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said first waveform profile is generally sinusoidal.
  • 21. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein in said stressed orientation of said gasket said body is deflected towards said first lateral surface.
  • 22. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said body is generally rectilinear.
  • 23. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said first lateral surface is generally concave.
  • 24. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said second lateral surface is angled towards said first lateral surface.
  • 25. The sealing assembly of claim 14 wherein said body is formed of an elastomeric polymeric material.
  • 26. The sealing assembly of claim 25 wherein said polymeric material contains an electrically-conductive filler.
US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
2778868 Stinger Jan 1957 A
4652695 Busby Mar 1987 A
4857668 Buonanno Aug 1989 A
4952448 Bullock et al. Aug 1990 A
5008485 Kitagawa Apr 1991 A
5020866 McIllwraith Jun 1991 A
5028739 Keyser et al. Jul 1991 A
5039825 Samarov Aug 1991 A
5045635 Kaplo et al. Sep 1991 A
5105056 Hoge, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5142101 Matsuzaki et al. Aug 1992 A
5147121 McIllwraith Sep 1992 A
5150282 Tomura et al. Sep 1992 A
5202536 Buonanno Apr 1993 A
5205781 Schwartz et al. Apr 1993 A
RE34393 McIllwraith Sep 1993 E
5566055 Salvi, Jr. Oct 1996 A
5578790 Peregrim Nov 1996 A
5641438 Bunyan et al. Jun 1997 A
5731541 Bernd et al. Mar 1998 A
5847317 Phelps Dec 1998 A
5882729 Kahl et al. Mar 1999 A
5910524 Kalinoski Jun 1999 A
6096158 Kahl et al. Aug 2000 A
6096413 Kalinoski et al. Aug 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
197 28 839 Sep 1998 DE
0 654 962 Nov 1994 EP
5-7177 Jan 1993 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
International Application Published Under the PCT, International Publication No. WO96/22672.
International Application Published Under the PCT, International Publication No. WO97/26782.
International Application Published Under the PCT, International Publication No. WO98/47340.
International Application Published Under the PCT, International Publication No. WO98/54942.
International Application Published Under the PCT, International Publication No. WO99/40769.
International Application Published Under the PCT, International Publication No. WO99/43191.
Chomerics, Parker-Hannifin Corp., brochure entitled “EMI Shielding and Grounding Spacer Gaskets” dated 1996.
Processing of Single and Multi-component Adhesives and Sealants by Paul Ivanfi, together with translation (undated).
Chomerics Parker-Hannifin Corp. Technical Bulletin 22 entitled “Cho-Shield EMI Shielding Covers” dated 1996.
Parker Seals article entitled “Parshield Conductive Elastomers” dated 1993.
Article by Shu H. Peng and W. S. Vicent Teng of Chomerics Parker-Hannifin Corporation entitled “Recent Development in Elastomeric EMI Shielding Gasket Design” (undated).
Copy of Patent Application Serial No. 09/042,135 filed Mar. 13, 1998 and assigned to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, entitled Low Closure Force EMI Shielding Spacer Gasket.
Copy of Patent Application Serial No. 60/183,395 filed Feb. 18, 2000 and assigned to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, entitled “Manufacture of Low Closure Force, Form-in-Place EMI Shleiding Gasket”.