In spite of the growth and development of many methods of soil wall stabilization, the excavation and implementation of retaining structures (such as, soil walls) in conditions such as, loose granular soil formations, and high groundwater levels within the excavation site are rendered ineffective and expensive. This poses a serious challenge to civil engineers. Especially, in an urban setting, the employment of machinery is impractical as excavation sites in urban areas are surrounded by infrastructure. Owing to this, non-standard methods are implemented, which have time and again proved to be equally ineffective and expensive.
Hence, there is a long felt but unresolved need for a method that addresses the aforementioned issues.
An embodiment of the present invention comprises a comprehensive excavation process performed at an excavation site. The process includes a wellpoint-based dewatering method for lowering the groundwater level within the excavation site. The dewatering method includes inserting a plurality of pipe assemblies into the excavation site. A pipe assembly comprises a casing pipe, the bottom extremity of which is fitted with a casing filter so that, the groundwater is drawn therethrough for filtration. The pipe assembly further comprises a suction pipe fixedly disposed within the casing pipe. The bottom extremity of the suction pipe is fitted with a suction filter so that, the groundwater is drawn therethrough for further filtration. The space between the casing and suction pipes is filled with a filler up to the brim. The brim between the casing and suction pipes is sealed by a sealant thereby rendering the top extremity of the suction tube open.
The dewatering method further includes establishing a fluid communication between the pipe assemblies and a header pipe by connecting a flexible pipe between the suction tube and the header pipe. Once the connections are made, the dewatering method further includes drawing groundwater out of the header pipe by means of suction created by a dewatering pump.
The process further comprises an improved soil nailing method for stabilizing soil walls that define the boundaries of the excavation site. The soil nailing method includes installing a reinforcing mesh within the space between a soil wall and the corresponding pipe assemblies, shotcreting a shotcrete layer over the mesh upon the installation thereof, hammering, to the required depth, a plurality of downwardly oblique reinforcing bars into the soil wall via the reinforcing mesh and the shotcrete layer, shotcreting the reinforcing bars and the corresponding portion of the mesh upon insertion of the reinforcing bars and securing the bars to appropriate casing pipes whereby, the casing pipes too are rendered reinforcing elements.
One aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a comprehensive excavation process performed at an excavation site, the process comprising: (a) a wellpoint-based dewatering method for lowering the groundwater level within the excavation site, the method including: (i) inserting a plurality of pipe assemblies into the excavation site; a pipe assembly comprising: (1) a casing pipe, the bottom extremity of which is fitted with a casing filter so that, the groundwater is drawn therethrough for filtration; and (2) a suction pipe fixedly disposed within the casing pipe, the bottom extremity of the suction pipe fitted with a suction filter so that, the groundwater is drawn therethrough for further filtration, the space between the casing and suction pipes filled with a filler, the top of the filler is sealed by a sealant rendering the top extremity of the suction tube open; (ii) establishing a fluid connection between the pipe assemblies and a header pipe by connecting a flexible pipe between the suction tube and the header pipe; and (iii) drawing groundwater out of the header pipe by means of suction created by a dewatering pump; and (b) an improved soil nailing method for stabilizing soil walls that define the boundaries of the excavation site, the method including: (i) installing a reinforcing mesh within the space between a soil wall and the corresponding pipe assemblies; (ii) shotcreting a shotcrete layer over the mesh upon the installation thereof; (iii) hammering, to the required depth, a plurality of downwardly oblique reinforcing bars into the soil wall via the reinforcing mesh and the shotcrete layer; (iv) shotcreting the bars and the corresponding portion of the mesh upon insertion of the bars; and (v) securing the bars to appropriate casing pipes whereby, the casing pipes too are rendered reinforcing elements.
In one embodiment of the process, the top extremities of the casing and suction pipes are flush with one another. In another embodiment, the pipe assemblies are disposed closer to the boundaries of the excavation site. In one embodiment, the casing filter comprises crushed stone. In another embodiment, the filler comprises gravel. In one embodiment, the sealant comprises bentonite and cement.
Another aspect of the present invention includes a pipe assembly insertion comprising: (a) inserting an elongated mandrel within the casing pipe, the mandrel, when inserted within the casing pipe, extending beyond the top and bottom extremities of the casing pipe, a portion of the mandrel projecting from the top extremity of the casing pipe comprising block portion, the width of the which being more than the diameter of the top extremity of the casing pipe so as to prevent the mandrel from slipping into the casing pipe, the bottom extremity of the mandrel terminating in a pointed end for easier penetration, the top extremity of the mandrel terminating in a flat end; (b) hammering the mandrel and thereby the casing pipe to the depth required into the site; (c) removing the mandrel from the casing pipe once the casing pipe is at the required depth; (d) inserting a guide cylinder into the casing pipe, the guide cylinder for installing the casing filter at the bottom extremity of the casing pipe; (e) inserting the suction pipe within the casing pipe; (f) filling the filler within the space between the casing and suction pipes; and (g) sealing the top of the filler with the sealant.
In a related embodiment, the mandrel is hammered by one of a hydraulic and mechanical hammer. In another related embodiment, the pointed end discharges fluid jet enabling the mandrel along with the casing pipe to be easily plunged into the site. In yet another embodiment, the bottom extremity of the casing pipe forms a snug-fit with the bottom extremity of the mandrel.
In one embodiment, the bars are secured to the casing pipe by welding. In another embodiment, the reinforcing bars are perforated and hollow so as to enable injection of the grout through the perforations thereby grouting the area of the soil wall in the vicinity of the reinforcing bars resulting in the reinforcement of the reinforcing bars. In one embodiment, the distal extremity at which the reinforcing bar is hammered into the soil wall is pointed for ease of penetration. In another embodiment, upon insertion of the reinforcing bar into the soil wall, the angle between reinforcing bar and the horizontal ranges between 15° and 20°. In one embodiment, the reinforcing bar comprises a barbed steel pipe. In another embodiment, the reinforcing bar comprises a plurality of shear members attached to the distal portion thereof, the distal portion comprising the distal extremity that penetrates the soil wall as the reinforcing bar is hammered thereinto; the shear members for providing better anchorage.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating specific embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
A description of embodiments of the present invention will now be given with reference to the figures. It is expected that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
The invention disclosed herein generally relates to various methods employed on a typical excavation site. More particularly, the present invention teaches a comprehensive excavation process that takes of lowering groundwater levels and stabilizing soil walls.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a comprehensive excavation process that, in a way, integrates wellpoint-based dewatering method and soil nailing method. The process is particularly tailored to be employed within the context of urban construction, especially where soil is loose, silty and granular and where the groundwater level is high. The process is also tailored to be employed within area that is so limited that it doesn't allow for embankment operations involving the usage of heavy and bulky machinery. The excavation process is carried out on an excavation site defined by site boundaries.
The process includes a wellpoint-based dewatering method, which initiates with hammering a plurality of pipe assemblies into the site. A well point is defined as a hollow pointed rod with a perforated intake driven into an excavation to lower the water table by pumping and thus minimize flooding during construction. More particularly, the pipe assemblies are inserted into the site such that, they are disposed closer to the site boundaries and are equidistant from each other. As viewed from top, the line joining consecutive pipe assemblies is parallel to the site boundaries. Preferably, a distance between said line and the corresponding site boundary ranges between 1.5 to 2.5 meters.
Referring to
Referring to
As can be appreciated from
As can be appreciated from
Referring to
Referring to
At step 4, as can be additionally appreciated from
Upon the installation of the filter bag 124 at the bottom extremity of the casing pipe 111, the guide cylinder 126 is withdrawn out of the casing pipe 111 as shown in step 5. Finer adjustments of the filter bag 124 is carried out by adjusting a strand link 129 connected to the filter bag 124 as shown in
Referring to
The header pipe 121 is connected to a dewatering pump 147 (
The excavation process, which as mentioned earlier, further includes the soil nailing method that is integrated with the dewatering method, which has been described in detail in the preceding body of text. Referring to
A plurality of reinforcing bars 130 are driven into the soil wall 142 via the shotcreted mesh 140 in a grid fashion. The horizontal distance between two horizontally-adjacent reinforcing bars 130 is maintained to be the same as the distance between two adjacent pipe assemblies. As the reinforced bars 130 are also vertically aligned (in a grid fashion), the vertically aligned reinforced bars 130 are inserted such that, the reinforced bars 130 are close to the pipe assemblies. Therefore, each pipe assembly corresponds to a plurality of vertically-aligned reinforced bars 130. Each reinforced bar 130 comprises a pointed distal extremity 132, about which the reinforced bar 130 is penetrated into the soil wall 142.
Referring to
Referring to
The method of the present disclosure further may comprises an improved soil nailing method for stabilizing soil walls that define the boundaries of the excavation site, the method comprising: (i) installing a reinforcing mesh within the space between a soil wall and the corresponding pipe assemblies; (ii) shotcreting a shotcrete layer over the mesh upon the installation thereof; (iii) hammering, to the required depth, a plurality of downwardly oblique reinforcing bars into the soil wall via the reinforcing mesh and the shotcrete layer; (iv) shotcreting the bars and the corresponding portion of the mesh upon insertion of the bars; and (v) securing the bars to appropriate casing pipes whereby, the casing pipes too are rendered reinforcing elements. The top extremities of the casing and suction pipes may be flush with one another. The pipe assemblies may be disposed closer to the boundaries of the excavation site, and the casing filter may comprise crushed stone. The filler may comprise gravel, and the sealant may comprise bentonite and cement.
Another aspect of the present invention includes a pipe assembly insertion comprising: (a) inserting an elongated mandrel within the casing pipe, the mandrel, when inserted within the casing pipe, extending beyond the top and bottom extremities of the casing pipe, a portion of the mandrel projecting from the top extremity of the casing pipe comprising block portion, the width of the which being more than the diameter of the top extremity of the casing pipe so as to prevent the mandrel from slipping into the casing pipe, the bottom extremity of the mandrel terminating in a pointed end for easier penetration, the top extremity of the mandrel terminating in a flat end.
The pipe assembly insertion further comprises hammering the mandrel and thereby the casing pipe to the depth required into the site; removing the mandrel from the casing pipe once the casing pipe is at the required depth; inserting a guide cylinder into the casing pipe, the guide cylinder for installing the casing filter at the bottom extremity of the casing pipe; inserting the suction pipe within the casing pipe; filling the filler within the space between the casing and suction pipes; and sealing the top of the filler with the sealant.
The mandrel may be hammered by one of a hydraulic and mechanical hammer. The pointed end may discharge fluid jet enabling the mandrel along with the casing pipe to be easily plunged into the site. The bottom extremity of the casing pipe may form a snug-fit with the bottom extremity of the mandrel. The bars may be secured to the casing pipe by welding. In one example, the reinforcing bars are perforated and hollow so as to enable injection of the grout through the perforations thereby grouting the area of the soil wall in the vicinity of the reinforcing bars resulting in the reinforcement of the reinforcing bars. The distal extremity at which the reinforcing bar is hammered into the soil wall may be pointed for ease of penetration. In one example, after insertion of the reinforcing bar into the soil wall, the angle between reinforcing bar and the horizontal ranges between 15° and 20°. The reinforcing bar may comprise a barbed steel pipe. In another example, the reinforcing bar comprises a plurality of shear members attached to the distal portion thereof, the distal portion comprising the distal extremity that penetrates the soil wall as the reinforcing bar is hammered thereinto; the shear members for providing better anchorage.
The foregoing description comprise illustrative embodiments of the present invention. Having thus described exemplary embodiments of the present invention, it should be noted by those skilled in the art that the within disclosures are exemplary only, and that various other alternatives, adaptations, and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention. Merely listing or numbering the steps of a method in a certain order does not constitute any limitation on the order of the steps of that method. Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions.
Although specific terms may be employed herein, they are used only in generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments illustrated herein. While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description and the examples should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13955014000301442 | Feb 2017 | IR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
191876 | Mesler | Jun 1877 | A |
790910 | McClintook | May 1905 | A |
951668 | Welsh | Mar 1910 | A |
1530221 | Uren | Mar 1925 | A |
1688356 | Romney | Oct 1928 | A |
2127175 | Imbertson | Aug 1938 | A |
2326155 | Mccook | Aug 1943 | A |
2636355 | Thornley | Apr 1953 | A |
3215213 | Morimoto | Nov 1965 | A |
3451348 | Tatsuo | Jun 1969 | A |
3839874 | Wyant | Oct 1974 | A |
4124982 | Fuller | Nov 1978 | A |
4176716 | Bielaczek | Dec 1979 | A |
4199272 | Lacey | Apr 1980 | A |
4223724 | Levoni | Sep 1980 | A |
4348058 | Coakley | Sep 1982 | A |
4448689 | von Nordenskjold | May 1984 | A |
4623025 | Verstraeten | Nov 1986 | A |
4883589 | Konon | Nov 1989 | A |
4898495 | Lin | Feb 1990 | A |
4934865 | Varkonyi | Jun 1990 | A |
4982788 | Donnelly | Jan 1991 | A |
5050676 | Hess | Sep 1991 | A |
5099917 | Roser | Mar 1992 | A |
5172764 | Hajali | Dec 1992 | A |
5183110 | Logan | Feb 1993 | A |
5279740 | Basile | Jan 1994 | A |
5358357 | Mancini | Oct 1994 | A |
5449253 | Roger | Sep 1995 | A |
5472294 | Billings | Dec 1995 | A |
5611402 | Welsh | Mar 1997 | A |
5655852 | Duffney | Aug 1997 | A |
5829530 | Nolen | Nov 1998 | A |
5906241 | Pehlivan | May 1999 | A |
6158512 | Unsgaard | Dec 2000 | A |
6224757 | Van Der Westhuysen | May 2001 | B1 |
6306296 | Kerfoot | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6402432 | England | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6854929 | Vinegar | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7033109 | Russell | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7326004 | Wissmann | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7901159 | Fox | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8152415 | Fox | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8740501 | Maher | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9840835 | Niroumand | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20040028480 | Verstraeten | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031603 | Minamijima | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040099300 | Warren | May 2004 | A1 |
20040129855 | Chen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040213636 | Russell | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050056422 | Harrington | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060110224 | Bodegom | May 2006 | A1 |
20060137872 | Steinbrecher | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147274 | Ding | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070077128 | Wissmann | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070127988 | Nakakuma | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070283866 | Veazey | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080193223 | Wissmann | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090290940 | Martin, Sr. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100028087 | Wissmann | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100266341 | Poerio | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110243666 | Fox | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120097387 | Nillert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130051927 | Kruse | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130177359 | Hamata | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195560 | Siepi | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150330051 | White | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20180201531 | Cohen | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180230665 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |