Comprehensive microbial panel for molecular diagnosis of eye infections

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12195810
  • Patent Number
    12,195,810
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 20, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 14, 2025
    8 days ago
Abstract
Methods for sensitive and reliable qualitative detection and identification of the common pathogens associated with ocular infections, including uveitis, endophthalmitis and keratitis.
Description
SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on May 29, 2020, is named SequenceListing.txt and is 23,255 bytes in size.


TECHNICAL FIELD

Described herein are kits, devices, and methods for diagnosing eye infections.


BACKGROUND

Eye infections are among the greatest causes of blindness worldwide. The sooner effective therapy can be started, the more vision that can be saved. In an era of increasing resistance, broad-spectrum antibiotics can no longer be relied upon.


SUMMARY

New technologies have the potential to significantly increase diagnostic sensitivity and quickly detect the microbe causing an infection, as well as its antibiotic resistance, providing the physician with critical information in hours, rather than days, and for a greater number of patients. The newly developed comprehensive eye panel described here is expected to support rapid treatment with the correct drug, which will limit the often-irreversible destruction that results in loss of vision.


Provided herein are methods comprising: providing a sample comprising, or suspected of comprising, a pathogen; optionally purifying genomic DNA from the pathogen; performing PCR by contacting the sample with a plurality of sets of primers to amplify each of at least 10, 20, 30, 40, or all of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement) in genomic DNA from the pathogen; and contacting the amplified DNA with a plurality of detectable probes, wherein the plurality comprises 1, 2, or more detectable probes that bind to each of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement).


Also provided are methods for determining identity of a pathogen in a sample, the method comprising: providing a sample comprising, or suspected of comprising, a pathogen; optionally purifying genomic DNA from the pathogen; performing PCR by contacting the sample with a plurality of sets of primers to amplify each of at least 10, 20, 30, 40, or all of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement) in genomic DNA from the pathogen; and contacting the amplified DNA with a plurality of detectable probes, wherein the plurality comprises 1, 2, or more detectable probes that bind to each of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement); detecting binding of the 1, 2, or more probes to the amplified DNA; determining the identity of the probes bound to the amplified DNA; and correlating the identity of the bound probes to a pathogen.


In addition, provided herein are methods for diagnosing an infection in a subject who has uveitis or detecting the presence of a pathogen in a subject who has uveitis. The methods include providing a sample from an eye of the subject comprising, or suspected of comprising, a pathogen; optionally purifying genomic DNA from the pathogen; performing PCR by contacting the sample with a plurality of sets of primers to amplify each of at least 10, 20, 30, 40, or all of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement) in genomic DNA from the pathogen; and contacting the amplified DNA with a plurality of detectable probes, wherein the plurality comprises 1, 2, or more detectable probes that bind to each of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement); detecting binding of the 1, 2, or more probes to the amplified DNA; determining the identity of the probes bound to the amplified DNA; and correlating the identity of the bound probes to a pathogen, thereby diagnosing the infection in the subject or identifying the pathogen.


Further, provided herein are methods for selecting a treatment and optionally treating a subject who has uveitis, the methods comprising: providing a sample from an eye of the subject comprising, or suspected of comprising, a pathogen; optionally purifying genomic DNA from the pathogen; performing PCR by contacting the sample with a plurality of sets of primers to amplify each of at least 10, 20, 30, 40, or all of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement) in genomic DNA from the pathogen; and contacting the amplified DNA with a plurality of detectable probes, wherein the plurality comprises 1, 2, or more detectable probes that bind to each of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement); detecting binding of the 1, 2, or more probes to the amplified DNA; determining the identity of the probes bound to the amplified DNA; and correlating the identity of the bound probes to a pathogen; and selecting and optionally administering to the subject a treatment for the pathogen, preferably wherein the treatment is selected according to Table A.


In some embodiments of the methods described herein, determining the sequence identity comprises using high resolution melting analysis.


In some embodiments of the methods described herein, the sequence identity of the amplified portion is correlated to a pathogen according to table 1.


In some embodiments of the methods described herein, the sample comprises aqueous humor, vitreous humor, or vitreous wash.


Also provided herein is a kit for use in a method described herein comprising: a plurality of sets of primers that amplify each of at least 10, 20, 30, 40, or all of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement); a plurality of probes that bind to each of the at least 10, 20, 30, 40, or all of the target sequences listed in Table 1 (or its complement), preferably wherein the plurality comprises at least 2 probes that bind to each of the target sequences; and optionally one or more reagents for performing a multiplexed gene analysis method, e.g., a hybridization based digital barcode quantification assays.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Methods and materials are described herein for use in the present invention; other, suitable methods and materials known in the art can also be used. The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting. All publications, patent applications, patents, sequences, database entries, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.


Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and figures, and from the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 provides an exemplary workflow for a method described herein.



FIG. 2 is a bar graph showing detection of VZV in a sample spiked with control VZV DNA.



FIG. 3 is a trio of bar graphs showing the analytical sensitivity of detection tested with common organisms causing eye infections. Serial 10-fold dilutions ranging from 2.5 pg/reaction to 2.5 fg/reaction for a Gram-positive (MRSA USA300), a Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa) organism, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) were tested. The limit of detection for the 3 organisms was 25 femtograms of DNA per reaction.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Presently, infections of the eye are typically treated empirically with an antibiotic or antiviral depending on the initial clinical evaluations until a definitive diagnosis is returned from the clinical microbiology laboratory. Because many ocular pathogens cannot be readily cultured, and because of the small sample size, after several days of effort, a culture report is often returned as negative despite clear evidence of an infection in the patient. Time delays and low sensitivity of pathogen detection result in patients being treated empirically or with the wrong drug for long periods. In the interim, the infection continues its destructive path—much of it preventable if the pathogen and its susceptibilities had been more quickly identified. For these reasons, there is considerable interest in molecular detection of eye pathogens directly from ocular tissues, which has shown to significantly improve diagnosis sensitivity1-7. Previously, detection was mainly done by regular monoplex PCR assays for detection of one target at a time, or by multiplex PCR tests that are constricted by the number of fluorescent agents that current real time PCR systems can detect at the same time.


Described herein are unique multiplex panels for sensitive, accurate, and rapid diagnosis of sight-threatening ocular infections, including uveitis, endophthalmitis and keratitis, which can be implemented using commercially-available technology such as the molecular barcoding platform NanoString. The present methods provide an unparalleled possibility for comprehensive detection of the most clinically relevant organisms that cause eye infections in just one assay. By consolidating the detection of bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites in only one platform, the use of this panel will not only save time on detection, but also spare precious small-volume ocular specimens. The detection of a variety of organisms that otherwise would require the use of multiple specific diagnostic tests, and a relatively high volume of sample, is possible with only a tiny ocular specimen in a single reaction. In addition to being uniquely designed to detect the most important ocular pathogens in a multiplex fashion, identification of pathogen DNA takes place in a highly sensitive platform for nucleic acid detection, which is expected to considerably improve the diagnostic sensitivities. Combined, the advantages of this panel is expected to greatly impact the clinical course of eye infections by supporting quick treatment with the correct drug, which will limit the often-irreversible destruction that results in loss of vision.


Methods of Diagnosis


Included herein are methods for sensitive and reliable qualitative detection and identification of the common pathogens associated with ocular infections, including uveitis, endophthalmitis and keratitis, including those shown in Table 1, directly from intraocular fluids in a single closed-tube reaction and methods of treatment based thereon. The methods include obtaining a sample comprising intraocular fluid from a subject, e.g., a sample comprising aqueous humor, vitreous humor, or vitreous wash, and evaluating the presence and/or level of a biomarker in the sample. Vitreous wash is the mix of vitreous and balanced salt solution that collects in the cassette of the vitrectomy machine during vitrectomy surgery, i.e., diluted vitreous humor. The sample can be obtained, e.g., by anterior paracentesis (aqueous samples), posterior chamber paracentesis (undiluted vitreous samples), or during pars plana vitrectomy (both undiluted vitreous and diluted vitreous washing samples).


The methods can optionally include comparing the presence and/or level of one or more of the biomarkers that can be used to determine the presence of a pathogen as described herein with one or more references, e.g., a control reference that represents a normal level of the biomarker e.g., a level in an unaffected subject, and/or a disease reference that represents a level of the biomarker associated with a specific infection, e.g., a level in a subject having an infection with a pathogen listed in Table 1. In some embodiments, the detection of any level of pathogen DNA indicates the presence of an infection with that pathogen.


The methods include first amplifying any sequences listed in Table 1 that are present in the sample using methods known in the art, e.g., using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative or semi-quantitative real-time RT-PCR, or digital PCR i.e. BEAMing ((Beads, Emulsion, Amplification, Magnetics) Diehl (2006) Nat Methods 3:551-559), e.g., using primers that amplify each of the followed by sequence identity analysis.


The presence of a sequence listed in Table 1 can be evaluated using methods known in the art, e.g., using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative or semi-quantitative real-time RT-PCR, digital PCR i.e. BEAMing ((Beads, Emulsion, Amplification, Magnetics), Diehl (2006) Nat Methods 3:551-559); various types of nucleic acid sequencing (Sanger, pyrosequencing, NextGeneration Sequencing); multiplexed gene analysis methods, e.g., oligo hybridization assays including DNA microarrays; hybridization based digital barcode quantification assays such as the nCounter® System (NanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA; Kulkarni, Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2011 April; Chapter 25:Unit25B.10) and lysate based hybridization assays utilizing branched DNA signal amplification such as the QuantiGene 2.0 Single Plex and Multiplex Assays (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; see, e.g., Linton et al., J Mol Diagn. 2012 May-June; 14(3):223-32); SAGE, high-throughput sequencing, multiplex PCR, MLPA, luminex/XMAP, or branched DNA analysis methods. See, e.g., WO2012/048113, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In some embodiments, the level of one or more of the biomarkers evaluated is comparable to or above the level of the biomarker in a disease reference, then the subject can be diagnosed with an infection with the pathogen associated with the biomarker. In some embodiments, once it has been determined that a person has an infection with an identified pathogen, then a treatment, e.g., as known in the art or as described herein, can be administered.


Suitable reference values can be determined using methods known in the art, e.g., using standard clinical trial methodology and statistical analysis. The reference values can have any relevant form. In some cases, the reference comprises a predetermined value for a meaningful level of the biomarker, e.g., a control reference level that represents a normal level of the biomarker, e.g., a disease reference that represents a level of the biomarker associated with a specific infection.


The predetermined level can be a single cut-off (threshold) value, such as a median or mean, or a level that defines the boundaries of an upper or lower quartile, tertile, or other segment of a clinical trial population that is determined to be statistically different from the other segments. It can be a range of cut-off (or threshold) values, such as a confidence interval. It can be established based upon comparative groups, such as where association with risk of developing disease or presence of disease in one defined group is a fold higher, or lower, (e.g., approximately 2-fold, 4-fold, 8-fold, 16-fold or more) than the risk or presence of disease in another defined group. It can be a range, for example, where a population of subjects (e.g., control subjects) is divided equally (or unequally) into groups, such as a low-risk group, a medium-risk group and a high-risk group, or into quartiles, the lowest quartile being subjects with the lowest risk and the highest quartile being subjects with the highest risk, or into n-quantiles (i.e., n regularly spaced intervals) the lowest of the n-quantiles being subjects with the lowest risk and the highest of the n-quantiles being subjects with the highest risk.


In some embodiments, the predetermined level is based on the level of detection of the assay used, and a level of the biomarker above the level of detection indicates the presence of the pathogen associated with that biomarker.


In preferred embodiments, one, two, or more detectable probes (e.g., probes that are detectable using a multiplex gene analysis method as known in the art and/or described above) that bind to each of the sequences listed in Table 1 are used in the present methods. In embodiments where two or more probes for each sequence are used, the number of false positives can be limited by requiring detection of binding of both probes in order to determine that a sequence is present in the sample.


Targeted Treatment


Once the presence of a specific pathogen has been identified using a method described herein, the method can include selecting and optionally administering a treatment specific for that pathogen as known in the art. For example, a treatment according the following Table A can be selected and/or administered:










TABLE A





Pathogen
Treatment







Herpes simplex
Systemic antiviral therapy (e.g., acyclovir, famciclovir,


virus 1 or 2
or valacyclovir) for uveitis and keratitis


(HSV1/2)
Intravitreal foscarnet or ganciclovir for uveitis



Topical ganciclovir gel, trifluridine and acyclovir oitments



for keratitis


Cytomegalovirus
Oral or IV antiviral therapy (e.g., valganciclovir, ganciclovir,


(CMV)
foscamet, or cidofovir)



Intravitreal foscarnet or ganciclovir for uveitis



Topical ganciclovir gel for keratitis


Varicella zoster
Oral or IV antiviral therapy (e.g., acyclovir, famciclovir,


virus (VZV)
valacyclovir) for uveitis and keratitis



Intravitreal foscarnet or ganciclovir for uveitis


Epstein-barr virus
Acyclovir, ganciclovir, valacyclovir and foscarnet


(EBV)




Toxoplasma gondii

Monotherapy or combination therapy with systemic antimicrobials.


(T. gondii)
The most commonly used are sulfadiazine, Bactrim, spiramycin,



clindamycin, pyrimethamine, atovaquone, andr azithromycin. The



traditional gold standard regimen has been triple drug therapy with



pyrimethamine (loading dose of 75-100 mg during the first day,



followed by 25-50 mg on subsequent days), sulfadiazine (loading



dose of 2-4 g during the first 24 h followed by 1 g qid), and



prednisone. Intravitreal clindamycin is also used in some cases.


Gram-positive
Intravitreal vancomycin (1 mg) for endophthalmitis. Systemic



cocci

antibiotics (e.g. linezolid and moxifloxacin) can be used.



Topical cefazolin (50 mg/ml), tobramycin or gentamicin (9-14



mg/ml) vancomycin (15-50 mg/ml), bacitracin (10,000 IU) and



fluoroquinolones (0.3% to 0.5%) for keratitis



Methicillin-

Intravitreal vancomycin (1 mg) for endophthalmitis.


resistant S. aureus
Topical cefazolin (50 mg/ml), tobramycin or gentamicin (9-14



mg/ml) vancomycin (15-50 mg/ml) or bacitracin (10,000 IU) for



keratitis. Linezolid and daptomycin could also be used for treatment



of both infections.


Gram-negative
Intravitreal ceftazidime (2.25 mg) or amikacin (0.1 mg) for



bacilli

endophthalmitis. Systemic antibiotics (e.g. moxifloxacin) can be



used. Topical tobramycin or gentamicin (9-14 mg/ml), ceftazidime



(50 mg/ml) and fluoroquinolones (0.3% to 0.5%) for keratitis



Candida spp.

Intravitreal amphotericin B (5 to 10 μg) or voriconazole (100 μg)



plus systemic therapy with amphotericin, fluconazole or



voriconazole and flucytosine for endophthalmitis. Oral fluconazole.



Topical amphotericin B solution or flucytosine, fluconazole and



itraconazole for keratitis.



Aspergillus spp.

Intracameral amphotericin (5 μg) or voriconazole (50 μg) and



intravitreal amphotericin (5 to 10 μg) or voriconazole (100 μg), plus



systemic voriconazole for endophthalmitis. Oral itraconazole



or voriconazole. Topical natamycin, amphotericin B, or



flucytosine, fluconazole and itraconazole for keratitis. Topical



voriconazole can be used for recalcitrant cases.



Fusarium spp.

Intracameral amphotericin (5 μg) or voriconazole (50 μg) and



intravitreal amphotericin (5 to 10 μg) or voriconazole (100 μg), plus



systemic voriconazole for endophthalmitis. Oral itraconazole



or voriconazole. Topical natamycin or flucytosine, fluconazole



and itraconazole for keratitis. Topical voriconazole can be used



for recalcitrant cases.



Mycobacterium

Isoniazid 5 mg/kg/day, rifampicin 450 mg/day if body weight is <50



tuberculosis

kg and 600 mg if the weight is >50 kg, ethambutol 15 mg/kg/day,



and pyrazinamide 25-30 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks, followed by two



drugs (rifampicin and isoniazid) for at least another 18 weeks



Treponema

Intravenous penicillin (4 million units every 4 h for 10 to 14 days)



pallidum





Borrelia

Intravenous ceftriaxone (2 g daily from 10 to 28 days) is the



burgdorferi

preferred therapy. Alternative includes intravenous penicillin G (15



to 20 million units daily for 10 to 14 days) and oral doxycycline (2



weeks)



Tropheryma

Intravenous therapy ceftriaxone (2 g daily for 2-4 weeks) or



whipplei

meropenem. Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and doxycycline










Kits


Included herein are kits that can be used in the present methods. The kits can include containers holding one or more of the primers, e.g., pairs of primers that can be used to amplify each of the sequences shown in Table 1, one or more detectable probes that bind to each of the sequences shown in Table 1, as well as one or more reagents for performing the method, e.g., reagents for use in multiplexed gene analysis methods as described herein or known in the art.


Examples

The invention is further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.


Methods


Selection of target sequences and panel design. Using sources including epidemiological information on the etiologies of ocular infections seen at our hospital, we identified 46 pathogens and 2 resistant/virulence markers that are commonly associated with ocular infections. This panel of organisms (Table 1) accounts for >90% of pathogens isolated from eye specimens. Genomic targets commonly used for PCR-based detection of these pathogens were scrutinized for stretches that are predicted to be specific for a particular species while being conserved across different strains from the same species. Regions of 150 to 300 bp in length were selected and a set of primers for pre-enrichment, and two 50 mer probes per target were designed to these sequences in collaboration with NanoString to incorporate their proprietary barcode sequences and bioinformatics algorithms to design probes that minimize cross-reactivity, and select probes with optimal thermodynamic profiles for optimized hybridization.












TABLE 1





Target
Gene
Target Sequence
#















Gram positive rods and cocci











Bacillus

RNA
GAATGCAAAGAGCGTGATGTGACGTATGCAGCACCACTTC
1



cereus group

polymerase
GTGTAAAAGTGCGTCTAATCAACAAGGAAACTGGTGAAGT




subunit B
AAAAGAACAAGATGTGTTCATGGGAGATTTCCCACTCATG




(rpoB)
ACAGAGACTGGAACATTCGTAATTAACGGTGCAGAACGTG





TTATCGTTTCCCAGTTAGTTCGCTCTCCAAGCGTATACTATA





GTGGCAAAGTGGATAAAAACGGAAAACGTGGTTTTACTGC





TACTGTAATTCCAAACCGCGGAGCTTGGTTAGAGTATGA







Bacillus

23S
CCCAGGCGACTGTTTAGCAAAAACACAGGTCTCTGCGAAG
2



subtilis

ribosomal
CCGTAAGGCGAAGTATAGGGGCTGACGCCTGCCCGGTGCT



group
subunit
GGAAGGTTAAGAGGAGCGCTTAGCGTAAGCGAAGGTGCGA





ATTGAAGCCCCAGTAAACGGCGGCCGTAACTATAACGGTC





CTAAGGTAGCGAAATTCCTTGTCGGGTAAGTTCCGACCCGC





ACGAAAGGCGCAACGATCTGGGCACTGTCTCAACGAGAGA





CTCGGTGAAATTAT







Enterococcus

D-Ala:D-
TAGAAAGCGACATCTTTCACCACTTCACCAGGTAAAGTCGT
3



faecalis

Ala ligase
ACGGACATCTTCATTTCCTAAAATGGCTACTTCAATTTCAC




(ddl)
GTGCTTCGATCCCTTGTTCAACAATTGCTCGGGCATCATAA





CGGAAAGCTTCTTCCAATGCTTCTTGCAATTCTTCACGATTT





TCCACTTTGCTAATTCCGACACTAGAACCCATATTGGCAGG





TTTAACAAAGACCGGATAAATTAAAGAACCTTCACATTTTT





CAAAGACTTCTTTTGGATTTCCTTTCCAGTCACTTCTTAAAA





CTGGCACGAAT







Enterococcus

D-Ala:D-
TTATTCATTTTTTTCAAAAAAAGATTGACGCTGATGGTATC
4



faecium

Ala ligase
GATTCATTCCTAACTGGATCAGTTCTTCAATCAAATCACCG




(ddl)
TATTTCAAGCCCATATTTTCCCATAAGAGTGGGTACATACT





GAACTCCGTAAATCCTGGCATAGAGTTTAATTCATTCAGGA





ATAATTCATTTTTATTTGTCAAAAAGAAATCGCACCGGCTC





AATCCGCTTCCACCTAACATCGTGTAAGCTAACTTCGCGTA





CTCTTGCGCTTTTTGATAAACTTCTTCTGGCACTTCGGCTGG





AATCTGCATTTC







Mycobacterium

Immuno-
CCGTGGTGCTCAAGGTCTACCAGAACGCCGGCGGCACGCA
5



tuberculosis

genic
CCCAACGACCACGTACAAGGCCTTCGATTGGGACCAGGCC




protein
TATCGCAAGCCAATCACCTATGACACGCTGTGGCAGGCTGA




MPT64
CACCGATCCGCTGCCAGTCGTCTTCCCCATTGTGCAAGGTG




(mpt64)
AACTGAGCAAGCAGACCGGACAACAGGTATCGATAGCGCC





GAATGCCGGCTTGGACCCGGTGAATTATCAGAACTTCGCAG





TCACGAACGACGGGGTGATTTTCTTCTTCAACCCGGGGGAG





TTGCTGCCCGAAGCAG







Propionibacterium

Triacyl-
ATGAAGATCAACGCACGATTCGCCGTCATGGCCGCGAGTG
6



acnes

glycerol
TGGCCGTCCTGATGGCTGCCGCGCCGATTGCGCAGGCTGCT




lipase
ACTTCGCCGGGGGATATCCATCCCCTGGTCCAGGCAGCCCA




precursor
CAGCCCCGACGGTATTCCCGGTAACGGCGTCGGGCCGGAA





TTCCATACGTCGTCGATGGCGCGTTCCTACAGCGAGAAGCA





CCTGGGCGTGGCGCCGCGGGGTGTGAACGACTTCTCCTGCA





AGGTCAAGCCCGGCGACCGACCGGTCATCCTGATTCCCGGT





ACTGGCGGCAATGCG







Staphylococcus

23S
AGTATTTGGTCGTAGACCCGAAACCAGGTGATCTACCCWT
7


spp.
ribosomal
GGTCAGGTTGAAGTTCAGGTAACACTGAATGGAGGACCGA




subunit
ACCGACTTACGTTGAAAAGTGAGCGGATGAACTGWGGGTA





GCGGAGAAATTCCAATCGAACTTGGAGATAGCTGGTTCTCT





CCGAAATAGCTTTAGGGCTAGCCTCAAGTGATGATTATTGG





AGGTAGAGCACTGTTTGGACGAGGGGCCYCTCTCGGGTTA





CCGAATTCAGACAAACTCCGAATGCCAAT







Staphylococcus

Immuno-
GCTGATAACAATTTCAACAAAGAACAACAAAATGCTTTCTA
8



aureus

globulin G 
TGAAATCTTGAATATGCCTAACTTAAACGAAGAACAACGC




binding
AATGGTTTCATCCAAAGCTTAAAAGATGACCCAAGCCAAA




protein A 
GTGCTAACCTATTGTCAGAAGCTAAAAAGTTAAATGAATCT




(spa)
CAAGCACCGAAAGCGGATAACAAATTCAACAAAGAACAAC





AAAATGCTTTCTATGAAATCTTACATTTACCTAACTTAAAC





GAAGAACAACGCAATGGTTTCATCCAAAGCCTAAAAGATG





ACCCAAGCCAAAGCGCT







Staphylococcus

Thermo-
TCAATTTATTAACCACGAAGGTCCATTTGGCGGTAAACAAT
9


capitis
nuclease
CAAATGAAAAAAATCTAAGCGCAGATTTAAAAGGAAAAGA





TAAAGTTTATGTTGAACGTGTAGTAGATGGGGATACTTTTC





TTGCTAAGAAAGATGGCGAGCGTATTAAAGTTAGAATGAT





TGGTATGGATACACCAGAAACGGTTAAACCAAATACGCCT





GTTCAACCCTATGGTAAAGAAGCATCAAACTATAGTAAGA





AAGAGTTAACACATAAGTATGTTTATTTAGAATACGATAAA





GAAAAAAATGATAGATA







Staphylococcus

Thermo-
CGATGATAGGAATACTTGTAATTATTTTCCAGTTTGTAAAC
10



epidermidis

nuclease
CATTCTGGACCGTTTAGTGATTCAGAATCTCAACATCAATC





AGATAATTCCAATTTAAATGGTAAAGACAAAGTATATGTG





AAACGAGTTGTAGATGGTGATACATTTGTTGCTCAAAAAAA





TGGAGAGGAAATTAAAGTCAGATTAATTGGTGTAGATACG





CCAGAGACTGTTAAGCCTAATACGCCAGTTCAACCATATGG





TAAACAAGCATCTAATTATACGAAGAAGTATCTCACGCATC





AAAATGTTTATTTAG







Staphylococcus

Thermo-
ACGCCTGAAACAGTGAAACCTAATACACCTGTACAGCCAT
11



lugdunensis

nuclease
ACGGTAAAGAAGCATCGCATTTTAGTAAAAAGAACTTAAC





CAATAAAGATGTTTATCTGGAATATGATAAAGAAAAAAAT





GATCGCTATGGACGTGTTTTAGCATATGTTTGGCTGGATAA





AGATACATTATTTAATGAGCTATTAGTAAAAGAAGGGTTAG





CTAAAGAAAAATACTTTGCACCTAATGGAAAATATAGAGA





CGTCTTTATCAAAGCACAAAACGAGGCGCAAAAGAAAAAA





ATCAATCTTTGGAGTTAG







Streptococcus

cAMP
ATGAACGTTAAACATATGATGTATCTATCTGGAACTCTAGT
12



agalactiae

factor (cfb)
GGCTGGTGCATTGTTATTTTCACCAGCTGTATTAGAAGTAC





ATGCTGATCAAGTGACAACTCCACAAGTGGTAAATCATGTA





AACAGTAATAATCAAGCCCAGCAAATGGCTCAAAAGCTTG





ATCAAGATAGCATTCAGTTGAGAAATATCAAAGATAATGTT





CAGGGAACAGATTATGAAAAAACGGTTAATGAGGCTATTA





CTAGTGTTGAAAAATTAAAGACTTCATTGCGTGCCAACCCT





GAGACAGTTTATGAT







Streptococcus

16S
AAAGGCAGTGGCTCAACCATTGTAGGCTTTGGAAACTGTTT
13



anginosus

ribosomal
AACTTGAGTGCAGAAGGGGAGAGTGGAATTCCATGTGTAG



group
subunit
CGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATATGGAGGAACACCGGTGGCGA





AAGCGGCTCTCTGGTCTGTAACTGACGCTGAGGCTCGAAAG





CGTGGGGAGCGAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACG





CCGTAAACGATGAGTGCTAGGTGTTAGGTCCTTTCCGGGAC





TTAGTGCCG







Streptococcus

16S
CTGACCGAGCAACGCCGCGTGAGTGAAGAAGGTTTTCGGA
14



mitts 

ribosomal
TCGTAAAGCTCTGTTGTAAGAGAAGAACGRGTGTGAGAGT



group
subunit
GGAAAGTTCACACTGTGACGGTAWCTTACCAGAAAGGGAC





GGCTAACTACGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACGTAGGTCC





CGAGCGTTRTCCGGATTTATTGGGCGTAAAGCGAGCGCAG





GCGGTTAGATAAGTCTGAAGTTAAAGGCTGTGGCTTAACCA





TAGTABGCTTTGGAAACTGTTTAACTTGAGTGCA







Streptococcus

Autolysin
ACGTTGGGGGCGGTTGGAATGCTGAGACCTATGCAGCGGT
15



pneumoniae

(lytA)
TGAACTGATTGAAAGCCATTCAACCAAAGAAGAGTTCATG





ACGGACTACCGCCTTTATATCGAACTCTTACGCAATCTAGC





AGATGAAGCAGGTTTGCCGAAAACGCTTGATACAGGGAGT





TTAGCTGGAATTAAAACGCACGAGTATTGCACGAATAACC





AACCAAACAACCACTCAGACCACGTTGACCCTTATCCATAT





CTTGCTAAATGGGGCATTAGCCGTGAGCAGTTTAAGCATGA





TATTGAGAACGGCTTGA







Streptococcus

Sodium
TCAGTGTCAAAGAAAAAGAGTTATTGACTAAAGAGCAATT
16



pyogenes

ATPase
TGATAAGCTATTGCAGGCTCCCAATACAACAACCTTAGCTC




subunit C
GACTGTTGCACCAGTCAGTCTATCACCTAACTGTTGACGAT




(ntpC)
CTCAACGATTTGGATCGGCTAGAATCTATCTTAATGGCTGA





GCTAACCAAGACCTATCGCTGGGCTTTTGCAGAAACCCCTC





AACCTGACATAGTACAATTATTTACCTTGCGTTACACCTAT





CATAATGTCAAAGTGTTGTTAAAAGCTAAAGCTAGTCAAGC





AGATCTGAGTCACT







Tropheryma

Repeat
AGAGAGATGGGGTGCAGGACAGGGTTTGTTTTGTACTGCTT
17



whipplei

region
GTAACAGGATCTATTAGGAGAGATACATTTGTGTTAGTTGT




(TW625)
TACACATACTTCTTGTGTATTTGTATTACTTACTCTTGTGTA





TTTGGTAYTAGATGAAACAGATGTAGATGAAACAGATGAT





AGGAGGGATAGRGCAGGAGGTGTCTGTCTGGCAAAGGCTG





TTTCATATTGTAGGGATGATAGGAGGAGAAG







Acinetobacter

16S-23S
GGGTCACAAGTTCAAGTCTTGTCAGACCCACCATGACTTTG
18



calcoaceficus-

intergenic
ACTGGTTGAAGTTATAGATAAAAGATACATGATTGATGATG




baumanii

space
TAAGCTGGGGACTTAGCTTAGTTGGTAGAGCGCCTGCTTTG





CACGCAGGAGGTCAGGAGTTCGACTCTCCTAGTCTCCACCA





GAACTTAAGATAAGTTCGGATTACAGAAATTAGTAAATAA





AGATTAAGATCTTGGTTTATTAACTTCTGTGATTTCATTATC





ACGGTAATTAGTGTGATCTGACGAAGACACATTAACTCATT





AACAGATTGGCAA







Acinetobacter

blaOXA-
GCCTGACAGCATGTAGCCTACCCGTTTCATCTCTCCCATCTC
19



lwoffii

134
AAAGCATTTCGACTCAAGCGATTGCCAGCTTATTTGATCAG





GCGCAAAGCTCTGGTGTTTTAGTGATTCAGCGTGATCAACA





AGTACAGGTCTATGGCAATGATTTAAATCGTGCAAATACCG





AATATGTTCCCGCCTCTACTTTTAAAATGCTCAATGCTCTGA





TTGGCCTGCAACATGGCAAAGCCACAACCAATGAAATTTTT





AAATGGGATGGCAAGAAACGCA







Enterobacter

DNA gyrase
GCTGGCGGTAACCGGTGAAACCGAAAGCACCGGTACCATG
20



aerogenes

subunit B 
GTGCGTTTCTGGCCAAGCCTGGAAACCTTTACCAACGTCAC




(gyrB)
TGAATTCGAATACGAAATCCTGGCGAAACGTCTGCGCGAG





CTGTCGTTCCTCAACTCCGGGGTCTCTATCCGCCTGCGCGA





TAAGCGCGACGGCAAAGAAGACCATTTCCACTACGAAGGC





GGCATCAAGGCGTTTGTTGAGTATCTCAACAAGAACAAAA





CGCCGATCCACCCGAATATCTTCTATTTCTCCACCGAAAAA





GACGGTA







Escherichia

UDP-N-
CGTCATGGCATCGCCATTGCCGGAACGCACGGCAAAACGA
21



coli

acetylmura
CAACCACCGCGATGGTTTCCAGCATCTACGCAGAAGCGGG




mate-L-
GCTCGACCCAACCTTCGTTAACGGCGGGCTGGTAAAAGCG




alanine
GCGGGGGTTCATGCGCGTTTGGGGCATGGTCGGTACCTGAT




ligase
TGCCGAAGCAGATGAGAGTGATGCATCGTTCCTGCATCTGC




(murC)
AACCGATGGTGGCGATTGTCACCAATATCGAAGCCGACCA





CATGGATACCTACCAGGGCGACTTTGAGAATTTAAAACAG





ACTTTTATTAATTTTCTG







Haemophilus

Phosphate
TCAGGGTGGGCTGGAGCATTCGCATTAGCTTTATTGCTTAT
22



influenzae

ABC
TCCTATCGTGGTACGCACTACGGACAATATGTTATTACTTG




transporter
TACCAAATAATTTACGTGAAGCAGCGGCAGCTCTTGGTTGC




permease
TCTCAATGGCAAGTTATTATGATGATTTGTTATCGAGCAGC




(pstA)
TAAATCAGGGATTTTAACTGGCGTGCTATTAGCAGTTGCCC





GAATTTCAGGAGAAACTGCACCGCTATTATTTACCGCTCTG





TCTAATCAATTTCTATCTTGGAATATGAATGAACCTATCGC





AAATTTACCTGTA







Klebsiella

DNA gyrase
AGTTTCTCGCCCAGGGCACAAATACGACGATATTCCGGCCC
23



pneumoniae

subunit B
CATAATGAACTCGTTATCCAGCGGATAGTCGGTATCCACGC




(gyrB)
CGTGGGTACGTACGCGAATAACCGGCTCAAAATGCTGCAG





TTCTTTGTTCTCGTGGAGATCGAATTTCCACTGGCTGCCGTG





CTGTTCTTTCTCGTTCAGCTC







Morganella

DNA gyrase
CATCCTGTACGGAGACTGAATTRTCATTGTGAATGGTCACA
24



morgani

subunit B 
AYGATGTCTTTACAGTAACCGGCGAGGGCTTCGTCGATAGC




(gyrB)
GTTGTCAACAACCTCGAAGACCATGTGGTGTAAACCGGTTC





CGTCATCGGTATCACCAATGTACATTCCCGGGCGTTTACGC





ACCGCGTCCAGCCCTTTTAATACTTTGATACTTGAGGAGTC





ATAGGTATTCGACAT







Proteus

Acetate
TGTTAATACTATTCTGGCTGAGAAACCAGAACTTTCACAAC
25



mirabilis

kenase
AAATCGCAGCAATTGGTCATCGTATTGTTCACGGTGGCGAG




(ackA)
AAATTTACTAAATCTGTCGTCATTACTGACGAAGTCATCAA





AGGTATTGAGGCGGCTATTCCATTTGCCCCATTACATAACC





CAGCTCACCTTATTGGTATTGAAGAAGCGCGTAAAGCCTTC





CCTCATTTAATTAATAAAATGGTGGCAGTATTTGACACTGC





ATTCCACCAAACAATGCCAGAAGAAGCTTATCTGTATGCTC





TGCCATACAGCTT







Pseudomonas

Gamma-
ATGACCGAGTCCGTCCTCGACTATATGAGCCGCCTTGGCCG
26



aeruginosa

glutamyl
CGATGCCCGCGCCGCCTCGCGGTTGCTCGCGCGCGCCGCCA




phosphate
CCGCGCAGAAGAACCGCGCCCTGCTGGCCGCGGCCGATGC




reductase
GCTGGACGCCGCCCGCGCGGAGTTGTCCCACGCCAACGAG




(pro A)
CAGGACCTCGCCGCCGGCCGCGCCAATGGCCTGGAGCCGG





CGATGCTGGACCGCCTGGCGCTGACCCCGGCGCGCATCGA





CGACATGATCGAGGGCCTGCGCCAGGTCGCCACGCTGCCC





GACCCGATCGGCGAGATC







Serratia

DNA gvrase 
CCTCAAGTATCAAGGTATTAAAAGGGCTGGATGCGGTGCG
27



marcescens

subunit B
CAAGCGCCCGGGCATGTATATCGGCGATACCGATGACGGC




(gyrB)
ACCGGTCTGCACCACATGGTATTCGAGGTTGTGGACAACGC





TATCGACGAAGCGCTCGCGGGCCACTGTAGYGACATTCAG





GTCACCATCCATGCYGACAACTCGGTATCGGTRCAGGATGA





CGGCCGCGGCATTCCGACCGGCATTCACCCGGAAGAAGGG





GTTTCAGCCGCAGAGGTCATCATGACCGTGCTGCACGCCGG





CGGTAAATTCGACGACAACTCCTATAA











Spirochetes











Borrelia

Flagellin 
ACAGACGAAATTAATAGAATTGCTGATCAAGCTCAATATA
28



burgdorferi

(flaB)
ACCAAATGCACATGTTATCAAACAAATCTGCTTCTCAAAAT





GTAAGAACAGCTGAAGAGCTTGGAATGCAGCCTGCAAAAA





TTAACACACCAGCATCACTTTCAGGGTCTCAAGCGTCTTGG





ACTTTAAGAGTTCATGTTGGAGCAAACCAAGATGAAGCTAT





TGCTGTAAATATTTATGCAGCTAATGTTGCAAATCTTTTCTC





TGGTGAGGGAGCTCAAACTGCTCAGGCTGCACCGGTTCAA





GAGGGTGTTCAACAG







Treponema

Membrane 
CCCAGTTGCGGTTCCTCATGAATTAAAAGGGATTGCAAAGG
29



pallidum

antigen
AGAAGTTTCACTTCGTGGAAGACTCCCGCGTTACGGAGAAT




(tpp47)
ACCAACGGCCTTAAGACAATGCTCACTGAGGATAGTTTTTC





TGCACGTAAGGTAAGCAGCATGGAGAGCCCGCACGACCTT





GTGGTAGACACGGTGGGTACCGGTTACCACAGCCGTTTTGG





TTCGGACGCAGAGGCTTCTGTGATGCTGAAAAGGGCTGAT





GGCTCTGAGCTGTCGCACCGTGAGTTCATCGACTATGTGAT





GAACTTCAACACGGT











Fungi











Aspergillus

Beta tubulin
TCTGACGGCAAGGATAGTTACAATGGCTCCTCCGATCTCCA
30



flavus


GCTGGAGCGTATGAACGTCTACTTCAACGAGGTGCGTACCT





CAAAATTTCAGCATCTATGAAAACGCTTTGCAACTCCTGAC





CGCTTCTCCAGGCCAGCGGAAACAAGTATGTCCCTCGTGCC





GTCCTCGTTGATCTTGAGCCTGGTACCATGGACGCCGTCCG





TGCCGGTCCCTTCGGTCAGCTCTTCCGTCCCGACAACTTCGT





TTTCGGCCAGTCCGGTGCTGGTAACAACTGGGCCAAGGGTC





ACTACACTGAGG







Aspergillus

Calmodulin
ATATTGAGGGTGTGCGCTGACACGAGATTTGACGTATAGG
31



fumigatus


ACAAGGATGGTGATGGTTAGTGACCCTTTTTCCACTCCTCG





AACTTCGGCTTCCATGCGATCATGTTCAAACGCCGACTCAC





AATATCCGGAAATGACCCKTCAGTACTGATAATATCTATGT





TTGACTATCAGGCCAGATCACCACCAAGGAATTGGGCACT





GTAATGCGCTCTCTGGGCCAGAACCCTTCCGAGTCAGAGCT





GCAAGATATGATCAACGAGGTGGATGCTGACAACAACGGC





ACCATCGATTTCCCCG







Aspergillus

Calmodulin
CGGTGAATCAGGCCAGATCACCACCAAGGAGCTCGGCACT
32



niger


GTGATGCGCTCCCTTGGCCAGAACCCCTCCGAGTCTGAGCT





TCAGGACATGATCAACGAGGTTGACGCTGACAACAACGGA





ACGATCGACTTCCCCGGTATGTGTTAGATTTACGCCTGTAA





GGCGGAAATGCGGGCTGGATTGTGATTGACTTTTGCCGCCA





GAATTCCTTACCATGATGGCTCGTAAGATGAAGGACACCG





ACTCCGAGGAGGAAATCCGCGAGGCTTTCAAG







Candida

28S
CTCTAAGTGGGTGGTAAATTCCATCTAAAGCTAAATATTGG
33



albicans

ribosomal
CGAGAGACCGATAGCGAACAAGTACAGTGATGGAAAGATG




subunit
AAAAGAACTTTGAAAAGAGAGTGAAAAAGTACGTGAAATT





GTTGAAAGGGAAGGGCTTGAGATCAGACTTGGTATTTTGCA





TGYTGCTCTCTCGGGGGCGGCCGCTGCGGTTTACCGGGCCA





GCATCGGTTTGGAGCGGCAGGATAATGGCGGAGGAATGTG





GCACGGCTTCTGCTGTGTGTTATAGCCTCTGACGATRCTGC





CAGCCTAGACCGAGGACTGCGGTTTT







Candida

ITS1-5.8S-
AACTTACAACCAAATTTTTTATAAACTTGTCACGAGATTAT
34



dubliniensis

ITS2
TTTTAATAGTCAAAACTTTCAACAACGGATCTCTTGGTTCTC




intergenic
GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATACGTAATATG




space
AATTGCAGATATTCGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACA





TTGCGCCCTCTGGTATTCCGGAGGGCATGCCTGTTTGAGCG





TCGTTTCTCCCTCAAACCCCTAGGGTTTGGTGTTGAGCAAT





ACGACTTGGGTTTGCTTGAAAGATGATAGTG







Candida

28S
GTGTCAGTTCTTTGTAAAGGGTGCTCGAAGAGTCGAGTTGT
35



glabrata

ribosomal
TTGGGAATGCAGCTCTAAGTGGGTGGTAAATTCCATCYAAA




subunit
GCTAAATACAGGCGAGAGACCGATAGCGAACAAGTACAGT





GATGGAAAGATGAAAAGAACTTTGAAAAGAGAGTGAAAA





AGTACGTGAAATTGTTGAAAGGGAAGGGCATTTGATCAGA





CATGGTGTTTTGCGC







Candida

ITS1
GTTATAACTAAACCAAACTTTTTATTTACAGTCAAACTTGA
36



tropicalis

intergenic
TTTATTATTACAATAGTCAAAACTTTCAACAACGGATCTCT




space
TGGTTCTCGCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATAC





GTAATATGAATTGCAGATATTCGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTG





AACGCACATTGCGCCCTTTGGTATTCCAAAGGGCA







Candida

28S
CCCAGACCTATGTAAAGTTCCTTCGAAGAGTCGAGTTGTTT
37



parapsiolosis

ribosomal
GGGAATGCAGCTYTAAGTGGGTGGTAAATTCCATCTAAAG



(sensulato)
subunit
CTAAATATTGGCGAGAGACCGATAGCGAACAAGTMCAGTG





ATGGAAAGATGAAAAGAACTTTGAAAAGAGAGTGAAAAA





GTACGTGAAATTGTTGAAAGGGAAGGGCTTGAGATCAGAC





TTGGTATTTTGTATGTTACTCTYTCGGGGGTGGCCTCTACAG





TTTACCGGGCCAGCATCAGTTTGRGCGGTAGGABAAKTGCA





AAGAAATGTGGCACTGC







Fusarium

28S
CCGAGTTGTAATTTGTAGAGGATRCTTTTGRYRMGGTGCCT
38


spp.
ribosomal 
TCCGAGTWCCCTGGAACGGGACGCCATAGAGGGTGAGAGC




subunit
CCCGTCTGGTTGGAYRCCRADYCTCTGTAAAGYTCCTTCRA





CGAGTCGAGTAGTTTGGGAATGCTGCTCTAAATGGGAGGT





ATATGTCTTCTAAAGCTAAATACYGGCCAGAGACCGATAG





CGCACAAGTAGAGTGATCGAAAGATGAAAAGMACTTTGAA





AAGAGRGTTAAAMAGYACGTGAAATTGTTGAAA







Fusarium

Calmodulin 
GCCGTTGTTGTCGGCGTCGACCTCGTTGATCATGTCCTGAA
39



solani

(cmdA)
GCTCAGACTCGGAGGGGTTCTGGCCGAGGGAGCGCATGAC





GGTGCCCAGCTCCTTGGTGGTGATCTGGCCTAGAGCGAAAC





GTTTAGTTTACCGTCTCGAAACGATTCGCATCGACTGAAGA





GCAGTGTGCGCATAGAGGTTCGATGCATCATGTAATTCGGA





AAAGGAATCGGGCTGAGGCCGACGAGGGGCTTTGCGAGCA





GGAGGGAGAATCACTCACCATCGCCATCCTTGTCCTATGCA





AGAGGTTAGCGACAG











Viruses










Cytomegalovirus
Immediate-
TCTCAGACACTGGCTCAGACTTGACAGACACAGTGTCCTCC
40



early gene 
CGCTCCTCCTGAGCACCCTCCTCCTGTTCCTCATCACTCTGT




(UL123)
TCACTTTCTTCCTGATCACTGTTCTCAGCCACAATTACTGAG





GACAGAGGGATAGTCGCGGGTACAGGGGACTCTGGAGGTG





ACACCAGAGAATCAGAGGAGCTGGCACCAGCGGTGGCCAA





AGTGTAGGCTACAATAGCCTCTTCCTCATCTGACTCCTCGG





CGATGGCCCGTAGGTCATCCACACTAGGAGAGCAGACTCT





CAAAGGATCGGCCC






Epstein-barr
DNA
GACATAGAGGGGGTTGAGGTCTACGAGTTCCCATCGGAGC
41


virus
polymerase
TGGACATGCTCTACGCCTTCTTCCAGCTCATCAGAGACCTC




(BALF5)
AGCGTGGAGATTGTGACCGGCTACAACGTGGCCAACTTTG





ACTGGCCCTACATTCTGGACAGAGCCAGGCACATCTACAGC





ATCAACCCAGCCTCTCTGGGCAAAATTAGGGCTGGGGGCG





TCTGCGAGGTCAGGCGACCCCATGATGCGGGCAAGGGCTT





CTTGCGGGCCAACACCAAGGTCCGCATCACCGGCCTCATCC





CCATCGACATGTACGCC






Herpes
DNA
AGCTCTCGAGCTACAAGCTCAACGCCGTGGCCGAAGCCGT
42


simplex 1
polymerase 
CCTGAAGGACAAGAAGAAGGACCTGAGCTATCGCGACATC




catalytic
CCCGCCTACTACGCCACCGGGCCCGCGCAACGCGGGGTGA




subunit
TCGGCGAGTACTGCATACAGGATTCCCTGCTGGTGGGCCAG




(UL30)
CTGTTTTTTAAGTTTTTGCCCCATCTGGAGCTCTCGGCCGTC





GCGCGCTTGGCGGGTATTAACATCACCCGCACCATCTACGA





CGGCCAGCAGATCCGCGTCTTTACGTGCCTGCTGCGCCTGG





CCGACCAGAAGGGCT






Herpes
DNA
GGCGGCGTCTGGGTTTTTTGCCCCCCACAACCCCCGGGGAG
43


simples 2
polymerase 
CCACCCAGACGGCACCGCCGCCTTGCCGCCGGCAGAACTTC




catalytic
TACAACCCCCACCTCGCTCAGACCGGAACGCAGCCAAAGG




subunit
CCCTCGGGCCGGCTCAGCGCCATACGTACTACAGCGAGTGC




(UL30)
GACGAATTTCGATTTATCGCCCCGCGTTCGCTGGACGAGGA





CGCCCCCGCGGAGCAGCGCACCGGGGTCCACGACGGCCGC





CTCCGGCGCGCCCCTAAGGTGTACTGCGGGGGGGACGAGC





GCGACGTCCTCCGCGT






Human
Glycoprotein
AAGTGGAACTGCTTGGTGGCGGATGGCTAGTGTGCCTATTA
44


herpes virus
(U22)
ATGCTTATTTCGAAAGAGATATAGCCTTTTTATTTAACCCTC



6

GATGCGTTATCGAGACTGCCCTGGGGTCTAAGATATTATGT





CGATACAATAAAAATATTGGTGTTGTGTTTGTGGACAATGA





TACTACGTGTAATGTTTCCTTTCCGAGCGGTGTGCAGTTAC





AATTACTAAATCAATCGGTGATGGAGTCAATTAGAACTAA





AACGTATGTAGTGGATTACGCTAGGAAAACTACAGAGAGA





GGTGATTGCTTCAT






Varicella
Regulatory
GGATACGTCGCGGGGCCCCGGCGCGTTTTGTACTCCGGGTT
45


zoster
protein
GGGAGATCCACCCGGCCAGGCTCGTTGAGGACATCAACCG




(ORF63)
TGTTTTTTTATGTATTGCACAGTCGTCGGGACGCGTCACGC





GAGATTCACGAAGATTGCGGCGCATATGCCTCGACTTTTAT





CTAATGGGTCGCACCAGACAGCGTCCCACGTTAGCGTGCTG





GGAGGAATTGTTACAGCTTCAACCCACCCAGACGCAGTGCT





TACGCGCTACTTTAATGGAAGTGTCCCATCGACCCCCTCGG





GGGGAAGACGGGTT











Parasite











Toxoplasma

Glycerol-3-
TTTGCATAGGTTGCAGTCACTGACGAGCTCCCCTCTGCTGG
46



gondii

phosphate
CGAAAAGTGAAATTCATGAGTATCTGTGCAACTTTGGTGTA




dehydrogenase
TTCGCAGATTGGTCGCCTGCAATCGATAGTTGACCACGAAC





GCTTTAAAGAACAGGAGAAGAAGATCGTGAAAGAATACGA





GAAGAGGTACACAGAGATAGAAGTCGCTGCGGAGACAGCG





AAGACTGCGGATGACTTCACTCCCGTCGCACCAGCAGCAG





AGGAGTGCCGGGCAAGAAAATGAGATGCCTAGAGGAGAC





ACAGCGTGTTATGAACAAATCTATTGAGGTTTCGCGAAGAG





GAGGGAACATATTATATACAGAAGAAGAACAAGAGACGTG





CCGCATGTCGCTAAGCCATCGGAAGGGATGCTCAGAAAAT





GGCACAGTATCACATTACAGTTCCGTTGATTCGTCTGATGG





TGACGAAAGGGGAAGAATAGTTGTCGCACCAAAACTSGCT





AGTTGTTAYTTTGAAGAAGACGAGAGATGGAGTGAACCAC





CAAAAATCGGAGAAAATCGATGGTGTCACGTTTTTTGTCAG





ACTTCACTTTGTGCAGAAGCATTGCCCGTCCAAACTGCAAC





AACTGCTCTAGCGTGTTCGTCTCCATTCCGTACAGTCTTCAA





AAATACAAAAGAGAACATTCCAGCAACTTCTRCCTTTGTTC





TTTTAGCCTCAATAGCAGGATGACGCCTCCCTCCTATCTTTC





AGCCAACCCAGCAAACACCGACGAACTCTCTGTAGAGTAA





CAA







Staphylococcus

icaA-D 
TACAGTTGCCTTATTTATTGACAGTCGCTACGAAAAGAAAA
47



epidermidisica


ATATAGTTGGCCTGATATTTTTAAGTTGGTATCCAACGTTAT



locus

ACTGGGTTATCAATGCCGCAGTTGTCATTATGGCATTTCCT





AAAGCATTAAAAAGAAAGAAAGGTGGCTATGCTACATGGT





CAAGCCCAGACAGAGGCAATATCCAACGGTAACCTCTTATT





TAAATATAGTTAGGGAGAGCTTATTTATTACTATATCCGGA





GTATTTTGGATGTATTGTATCGTTGTGATGATTGTTTATATA





GGAACTCTTAT







Staphylococci

mecA
TGAAAAATGATTATGGCTCAGGTACTGCTATCCACCCTCAA
48


mec A

ACAGGTGAATTATTAGCACTTGTAAGCACACCTTCATATGA





CGTCTATCCATTTATGTATGGCATGAGTAACGAAGAATATA





ATAAATTAACCGAAGATAAAAAAGAACCTCTGCTCAACAA





GTTCCAGATTACAACTTCACCAGGTTCAACTCAAAAAATAT





TAACAGCAATGATTGGGTTAAATAACAAAACATTAGACGA





TAAAACAAGTTATAAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGCAAAAA





GATAAATCTTGGGGTG










#, SEQ ID NO:


Multiplex-Targeted Enrichment


Because of the low pathogen biomass in ocular specimens, analytical sensitivity of an assay is critical for its clinical applications. To deal with that issue, we performed a multiplex-targeted enrichment step before detecting species-specific DNA segments with barcoded probes. Primers flanking the targeted genomic regions that bind to the specific probes were designed (described above). A 10-μl polymerase chain reaction is set up using 5 μl of 2× TaqMan PCR master mix, 1 μl of the primer mixture at 0.5 nM per oligonucleotide, 2.5 μl of purified DNA and sterile water to complete to the final volume. PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94° C. denaturation for 5 minutes followed by 20 cycles of 15 seconds at 94° C. and 4 minutes at 60° C. This number of cycles was found to improve sensitivity while maintain a low level of background noise.


DNA Detection


DNA from control organisms used for analytical validation and from clinical specimens were extracted and purified using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen), following the tissue protocol. Purified DNA was eluted from the silica membrane in 50 μL EB buffer and used as input for the multiplex-targeted enrichment step described above. Enriched samples were than mixed with a cocktail of 96 probes (2 50 mer probes per each of the 48 targets), containing one capture probe that secures the target of interest to the analysis matrix, and a second 50 mer that attaches a unique color-coded barcode for that pathogen or resistance/virulence gene. The hybridization was performed at 67° C. for 16 h and the resulting products analyzed in the Nanostring nCounter Digital Analyzer.


Analytical Specificity.


The analytical specificity of the panel has been tested for a subset of organisms. Purified genomic DNA from herpes virus 1 strain MacIntyre (VR-529DQ), herpes virus 2 strain MS (VR-540DQ), varicella zoster virus (VZV) strain Ellen (VR-1367DQ), cytomegalovirus (CMV) strain AD169 (VR-538DQ), Staphylococcus aureus (Strain MRSA USA300), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC35984), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (clinical isolate), Staphylococcus capitis (clinical isolate), Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC19615), Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC13813), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC700802) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC27853) were used for probe specificity validation.


Analytical Sensitivity.


Analytical sensitivity was evaluated for a constricted number of targets present in the panel. Preliminary testing were performed using purified genomic DNA from one Gram-positive (S. aureus USA300 strain) and one Gram-negative pathogen (P. aeruginosa ATCC27583) and Cytomegalovirus (strain AD169; VR-538DQ), serially diluted (10-fold) from 1 pg/μl to 1 fg/μl.


Validation with Ocular Specimens.


Protocols for collection of discarded intraocular specimens were approved by the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Institutional Review Board. Samples were obtained either by anterior paracentesis (aqueous samples), posterior chamber paracentesis (undiluted vitreous samples), or during pars plana vitrectomy (both undiluted vitreous and diluted vitreous washing samples). Following collection, all specimens were immediately transported to the laboratory and stored at −20° C.


Example 1

The probes and primers have been shown to be highly specific. We tested the analytical specificity of this panel using a collection of control DNA from bacteria (8 different species plus 1 antimicrobial resistant gene) and herpesviruses (n=4) (Table 2). All the probes and oligonucleotides tested demonstrated excellent target specificity, with no cross-reactivity detected. Exemplary results are shown in FIG. 2.









TABLE 2







List of targets tested for analytical specificity








Organism
Control Isolate










Bacteria









Staphylococcus aureus

MRSA USA300 strain



Staphylococcus epidermidis


S. epidermidis ATCC35984




Staphylococcus lugdunensis

Clinical isolate (identified by MicroScan)



Staphylococcus capitis

Clinical isolate (identified by MicroScan)



Streptococcus pyogenes

ATCC19615



Streptococcus agalactiae

ATCC13813



Enterococcus faecalis

ATCC 700802, V583 strain



Pseudomonas aeruginosa


P. aeruginosa ATCC27583








Virus








Cytomegalovirus
CMV-AD169


Varicella zoster
VZV-Rod


Herpes simplex 1
HSV-1


Herpes simples 2
HSV-2







Resistance Markers








mecA
MRSA USA300 strain









The panel we tested could detect minute amounts of DNA. Serial 10-fold dilutions of DNA ranging from 2.5 pg/reaction to 2.5 fg/reaction were tested in order to determine the limits of detection (LoD). We used purified control DNA from P. aeruginosa (ATCC27853), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA strain USA300) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV), organisms that are commonly associated with eye infections. As low as 25 femtograms of DNA per reaction was detected for the 3 pathogens tested (FIG. 3).


Detection and identification were shown to be possible directly from the primary eye sample. To challenge this diagnostic panel with clinical eye specimens, we performed a small pilot study testing 3 different intraocular fluids (aqueous, vitreous and vitreous wash) collected from patients with CMV and VZV retinitis that were previously confirmed by real-time PCR. The NanoString-based multiplex panel was capable to correctly identify the causative agent from all the intraocular fluid matrices tested (Table 3). The detection was very robust, with counts for the correct pathogen 3 to 4 logs higher than the reaction noise.









TABLE 3







Specific identification and robust detection


of herpesviruses from 3 intraocular specimens










Nanostring Detection













Clinical

Probe
Probe A
Probe B
Real Time


Diagnosis
Specimen
Identity
count
count
PCR Result





CMV
Aqueous
CMV
5 × 105
7 × 105
CMV


Retinitis
humor






CMV
Vitreous
CMV
1 × 105
1.5 × 105 
CMV


Retinitis
wash






Acute
Vitreous
VZV
7 × 105
1 × 106
VZV


Retinal
tap






Necrosis









REFERENCES



  • 1. Bispo P J, de Melo G B, Hofling-Lima A L, Pignatari A C. Detection and gram discrimination of bacterial pathogens from aqueous and vitreous humor using real-time PCR assays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52:873-881.

  • 2. Dabil H, Boley M L, Schmitz T M, Van Gelder R N. Validation of a diagnostic multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for infectious posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119:1315-1322.

  • 3. De Groot-Mijnes J D, Rothova A, Van Loon A M, et al. Polymerase chain reaction and Goldmann-Witmer coefficient analysis are complimentary for the diagnosis of infectious uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141:313-318.

  • 4. Harper T W, Miller D, Schiffman J C, Davis J L. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of aqueous and vitreous specimens in the diagnosis of posterior segment infectious uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:140-147 e142.

  • 5. Sugita S, Ogawa M, Shimizu N, et al. Use of a comprehensive polymerase chain reaction system for diagnosis of ocular infectious diseases. Ophthalmology 2013; 120:1761-1768.

  • 6. Sugita S, Shimizu N, Watanabe K, et al. Use of multiplex PCR and real-time PCR to detect human herpes virus genome in ocular fluids of patients with uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92:928-932.

  • 7. Taravati P, Lam D, Van Gelder R N. Role of molecular diagnostics in ocular microbiology. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 2013; 1.

  • 8. Barczak A K, Gomez J E, Kaufmann B B, Hinson E R, Cosimi L, Borowsky M L, Onderdonk A B, Stanley S A, Kaur D, Bryant K F, Knipe D M, Sloutsky A, Hung D T. RNA signatures allow rapid identification of pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012 Apr. 17; 109(16):6217-22.



Other Embodiments

It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: providing a sample comprising intraocular fluid;purifying genomic DNA from the sample;performing PCR by contacting the sample with a plurality of sets of primers to amplify each of at least 40 of the target sequences SEQ ID NOs: 1-48, or its complement, in the genomic DNA; andcontacting the amplified DNA with a plurality of detectable probes that bind to each of the at least 40 of the target sequences, or its complement, wherein the plurality comprises at least 2 detectable probes that bind to each of the at least 40 of the target sequences, or its complement.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining identity of the probes bound to the amplified DNA and determining sequence of the amplified DNA based on the identity of the bound probes, wherein determining the identity comprises using high resolution melting analysis.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample comprises aqueous humor, vitreous humor, or vitreous wash.
  • 4. A method of selecting a treatment and treating a subject who has uveitis, the method comprising: providing a sample from an eye of the subject comprising, or suspected of comprising, a pathogen;optionally purifying genomic DNA from the pathogen;performing PCR by contacting the sample with a plurality of sets of primers to amplify each of at least 40, of the target sequences SEQ ID NOs: 1-48, or its complement, in genomic DNA from the pathogen; andcontacting the amplified DNA with a plurality of detectable probes that bind to each of the at least 40 of the target sequences, or its complement, wherein the plurality comprises at least 2 detectable probes that bind to each of the at least 40 of the target sequences, or its complement;detecting binding of the at least 2 probes to the amplified DNA;determining identity of the probes bound to the amplified DNA and determining sequence of the amplified DNA based on the identity of the bound probes;correlating the sequence of the amplified DNA to a pathogen, thereby identifying the pathogen; andselecting and administering to the subject a treatment for the identified pathogen, wherein the treatment is an antiviral for a viral pathogen, an antifungal for a fungal pathogen, an antibacterial for a bacterial pathogen, or anti-parasitic treatment for a parasitic pathogen.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein determining the identity comprises using high resolution melting analysis.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the sample comprises aqueous humor, vitreous humor, or vitreous wash.
  • 7. A kit comprising: a plurality of sets of primers that amplify each of at least 40 of the target sequences SEQ ID NOs:1-48, or its complement;a plurality of probes that bind to each of the at least 40 of the target sequences, or its complement, wherein each of the probes comprises a barcode sequence; andoptionally one or more reagents for performing a multiplexed gene analysis method.
  • 8. The kit of claim 7, wherein the kit comprises one or more reagents for performing a multiplexed gene analysis method, and wherein the multiplexed gene analysis method is a hybridization based digital barcode quantification assay.
  • 9. The kit of claim 7, wherein the plurality of probes comprises at least 2 probes that bind to each of the at least 40 of the target sequences.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a U.S. National Stage Entry of PCT/US2018/066836, filed on Dec. 20, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/610,012, filed on Dec. 22, 2017. The entire contents of the foregoing are hereby incorporated by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2018/066836 12/20/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/126523 6/27/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
20100129391 Reed et al. May 2010 A1
20170275710 Rao et al. Sep 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 03087353 Oct 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Barczak et al., “RNA signatures allow rapid identification of pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Apr. 2012, 109(16):6217-6222.
Bispo et al., “Pignatari AC. Detection and gram discrimination of bacterial pathogens from aqueous and vitreous humor using real-time,” PCR Assays. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., Feb. 2011, 52(2):873-881.
Dabil et al., “Validation of a diagnostic multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for infectious posterior uveitis,” Arch. Ophthalmol, Sep. 2001, 119(9):1315-1322.
Groot-Mijnes et al., “Polymerase chain reaction and Goldmann-Witmer coefficient analysis are complimentary for the diagnosis of infectious uveitis,” Am. J. Ophthalmol, Feb. 2006;141(2):313-318.
Harper et al., “Polymerase chain reaction analysis of aqueous and vitreous specimens in the diagnosis of posterior segment infectious uveitis,” Am. J. Ophthalmol, Jan. 2009, 147(1):140-147.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Appln. No. PCT/US2018/066836, dated Jun. 23, 2020, 11 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2018/066836, dated Jun. 17, 2019, 21 pages.
Sugita et al., “Use of a comprehensive polymerase chain reaction system for diagnosis of ocular infectious diseases,” Ophthalmology, Sep. 2013,120(9):1761-1768.
Sugita et al., “Use of multiplex PCR and real-time PCR to detect human herpes virus genome in ocular fluids of patients with uveitis,” Br. J. Ophthalmol., Jul. 2008, 92(7):928-932.
Taravati et al., “Role of molecular diagnostics in ocular microbiology,” Curr. Ophthalmol. Rep., Dec. 2013, 1(4):181-189.
Bispo et al., “Detection and gram discrimination of bacterial pathogens from aqueous and vitreous humor using real-time,” PCR Assays. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., Feb. 2011, 52(2):873-881.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200385818 A1 Dec 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62610012 Dec 2017 US