The disclosure relates to high dynamic range video and related methods and devices.
Humans can see brightness variations over a dynamic range of about 10,000:1 simultaneously within a scene. Some cameras are able to capture images over that dynamic range and preserve the dynamic range by encoding the images digitally by storing pixel brightness values 14 bits per color. Human visual perception has a non-linear relationship to brightness, and brightness is often encoded digitally using a non-linear power law known as a gamma function.
Early research and technology such as cathode ray tubes suggested that video signals should be digitized using a gamma function using 8 bits per pixel for brightness. Accordingly, much contemporary digital video for consumer equipment and computer graphics uses 8 bit encoding. Existing television, cable, and satellite channels typically operate with 8 bit signals defining the standard dynamic range. Thus, while some modern cameras capture images at a higher dynamic range, video is typically broadcast and displayed at 8 bit standard dynamic range.
The invention provides methods for the real-time, reversible compression of high dynamic range videos, allowing high dynamic range videos to be broadcast through standard dynamic range channels. A high-dynamic range video signal is streamed through a pipeline that processes the video stream in a pixel-by-pixel manner as the pixels stream through the pipeline. The pipeline includes a transfer function that that decreases a number of bits of each pixel to a standard dynamic range, in a reversible manner, to allow the high dynamic range video to be transmitted over existing, standard dynamic range channels. The transfer function may be an opto-electrical transfer function (OETF) such as S-Log that converts pixels from greater than 8 bits per color to at most 8 bits per color, and the inverse function may be applied by a receiver such as a display device to display the video with high dynamic range.
The processer process pixels in a pipeline in real-time to form the high dynamic range video. Pipeline processing of the pixels as they stream through the processor provides a high dynamic range (HDR) pixel stream and also uses the OETF to decrease the number of bits per pixel as the pixels stream through the pipeline in a frame-independent manner, allowing the live video to be captured and broadcast for display in real-time. Because the transfer function reversibly decreases the number of bits per pixel, methods are useful for reversibly compressing live high dynamic range video signal for transmission over standard dynamic range channels. After transmission over standard dynamic range channels, the compressed signal may be displayed at the low dynamic range or transformed back into, and displayed at, the high dynamic range.
In preferred embodiments, the pipeline processing is performed on a processor of a video camera that uses one or more sensors to capture incoming light. The sensors may use an optical splitting system with a beam splitter that splits incoming light onto the multiple image sensors. By using a beamsplitter with an asymmetric split ratio, the multiple image sensors capture images that are identical except for light level. That is, one of the sensors captures a bright version of an image while another captures the same image, at a lower light level. Those images are streamed from the sensors onto the processor where they are merged, in pipeline processing, to form a high dynamic range image. Portions of the bright image that are saturated can be replaced with corresponding portions from the less-bright image. A pipeline on the processing device can do this in a streaming, pixel-by-pixel manner so that a high dynamic range (HDR) stream is formed in real time as the camera is used to capture a scene. The pipeline also applies an opto-electrical transfer function (OETF) to the HDR stream to reversibly convert them into a standard dynamic range (SDR) video stream (e.g., 8 bit), which can be transmit or broadcast over existing 8 bit infrastructure. Thus embodiments of the disclosure include methods and devices for capturing a video signal and streaming it as pixel values in real time as an HDR stream, applying a transfer function such as s-log to compress the HDR stream into an SDR video stream, and broadcasting the compressed SDR video stream in real time with the capturing.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides a video processing method. The method includes streaming pixel values from at least one image sensor through a pipeline on a processor. The pipeline includes an HDR function that combines the streaming pixel values in real-time into an HDR stream and a transfer function that converts the HDR stream to an SDR video stream. The method further includes transmitting the SDR video stream to a receiver in real time for display as a video.
Optionally, the method includes applying an inverse of the transfer function to the SDR video stream within the receiver to de-compress the video stream back into an HDR video for display, where the receiver is an HDR display device. Preferably, the HDR function and the transfer function are done by pipeline processing on a pixel-by-pixel basis while the streaming and transmitting steps are performed simultaneously.
Where the image sensor and processor are provided within a video camera, the pipeline processing allows the camera to capture the video of a live event for display by the receiver as live playback. The receiver may itself be an HDR display device. Preferably, the HDR stream comprises HDR pixels that use greater than 8 bits per color (e.g., 14 bit) and the SDR video stream comprises SDR pixels that use no more than 8 bits per pixel value (e.g., 8 bit). The transfer function may be an opto-electric transfer function such as S-Log 1, S-Log 2, or S-Log 3, and the method may include providing the receiver with an electro-optical transfer function (EOTF, an inverse of the OETF) for use by the receiver to convert the SDR video stream into an HDR video stream. The transfer function may be any suitable EOTF such as, for example, Filestream, S-Log, Panalog, Log C, and Canon Log.
Embodiments of the methods may include receiving incoming light through a lens and at least one beamsplitter, in which the beamsplitter splits the incoming light onto multiple image sensors such that the multiple image sensors each receive images that are identical but for light level. The HDR function in the pipeline may include a kernel operation that identifies saturated pixel values and a merge operation that merges the pixel values to produce the HDR stream. Merging may exclude at least some of the saturated pixel values from the HDR video signal.
Preferably, the multiple image sensors include at least a high exposure (HE) sensor and a middle exposure (ME) sensor, and wherein merging the sequences includes using HE pixel values that are not saturated and ME pixel values corresponding to the saturated pixel values. By using, for example, an asymmetric beamsplitter, at least 95% of the incoming light impinges on, or is captured by, the multiple image sensors. In some embodiments, streaming the pixel values through the kernel operation includes examining values from a neighborhood of pixels surrounding a first pixel on the HE sensor, finding saturated values in the neighborhood of pixels, and using information from a corresponding neighborhood on the ME sensor to estimate a value for the first pixel. Real-time, pipeline processing provides that at least some pixel values may be converted to SDR by the transfer function while the image sensors are still converting the incoming light into the pixel values for the same image, or frame. Sequences of the pixel values may be streamed through the processing device and merged without waiting to receive pixel values for an entire image from all pixel sites on the image sensors,
In related aspects, the disclosure provides a high dynamic range video camera. The camera includes at least one image sensor coupled to a processor and a pipeline on the processor that processes streams of pixel values from the sensor. The pipeline includes an HDR function that combines the streaming pixel values in real-time into an HDR video stream and a transfer function that converts the HDR video stream to an SDR video stream. Preferably, the HDR video stream comprises HDR pixel values with light levels encoded at greater than 8 bits per color, per pixel, and the SDR video stream comprises SDR pixel values with light levels encoded at no greater than 8 bits per color, per pixel. The HDR function and the transfer function may be performed in real-time on the streaming pixel values such that the SDR video stream can be received and displayed by a receiver as a live broadcast.
In preferred embodiments, the image sensor is provided in an optical splitting system that comprises a lens, at least one beamsplitter, and a plurality of image sensors. The plurality of image sensors may include at least a high exposure (HE) sensor and a middle exposure (ME) sensor, with the HE sensor, the ME sensor, the lens and the beamsplitter arranged to receive an incoming beam of light and split the beam of light into at least a first path that impinges and HE sensor and a second path that impinges on the ME sensor. The beamsplitter directs a majority of the light to the first path and a lesser amount of the light to the second path. The first path and the second path impinge on the HE and the ME sensor, respectively, to generate images that are optically identical but for light level.
In certain embodiments, the HDR function in the pipeline includes a kernel operation that identifies saturated pixel values and a merge module to merge the pixel values to form the HDR video stream. The kernel operation may be designed to operate on pixel values as they stream from each of the plurality of image sensors by examining, for a given pixel on the HE sensor, values from a neighborhood of pixels surrounding the given pixel, finding saturated values in the neighborhood of pixels, and using information from a corresponding neighborhood on the ME sensor to estimate a value for the given pixel. The pipeline may include (e.g., in the following order) a sync module to synchronize the pixel values as the pixel values stream onto the processing device from the plurality of image sensors; the HDR function comprising the kernel operation and the merge module; a demosaicing module; a tone-mapping operator; and the transfer function. The transfer function preferably includes an opto-electrical transfer function (OETF) such as an S-Log function.
The disclosure provides methods and devices that apply an EOTF (electro-optic transfer function) to a stream of pixels, to convert a video stream with for example more than 8 bits per color to a video stream with 8 bits per color. The EOTF provides a modified gamma function, such as may be used in an S-Log function. Methods may further include applying the inverse EOTF at the other end of the transmission to convert, e.g., the 8 bits per color video signal back into a signal with greater than 8 bits per color.
For example, a video stream may have 14 bits per color. Methods of the disclosure apply a specific S-log transfer function to that stream (preferably in a pipeline process, pixel-by-pixel) to convert each pixel to 8-bits per color. Then the 8-bit video signal may be sent via a standard 8-bit television, cable, or satellite channel to a receiver, where the receiver would apply an inverse of the transfer function to produce a 14-bit signal which could then be displayed on a 14-bit display. Thus, methods and devices of the disclosure are useful for transmitting HDR video over standard TV channels.
In preferred embodiments, the kernel operation 413 operates on pixel values as they stream from each of the plurality 265 of image sensors by examining, for a given pixel on the HE sensor, values from a neighborhood of pixels surrounding the given pixel, finding saturated values in the neighborhood of pixels, and using information from a corresponding neighborhood on the ME sensor to estimate a value for the given pixel. Alternatively, the pipeline 231 may include—in the order in which the pixel values flow: a sync module 405 to synchronize the pixel values as the pixel values stream onto the processing device from the plurality of image sensors; the HDR function 411 comprising the kernel operation 413 and the merge module 421; a demosaicing module 425; a tone-mapping operator 427; and the transfer function 423.
Preferably, the transfer function 423 provides an opto-electrical transfer function (OETF) such as an S-Log function.
The inverse function may be used and provided for use by the receiver to convert the SDR video stream into an HDR video stream, e.g., where the receiver comprises a high-dynamic range display device. The ITU-R BT 709 curve was designed to produce a uniform perception of video noise in an analog signal. However, in quantizing a video signal, it may be more important to avoid contouring and match the human visual systems brightness perception than to avoid noise. To avoid contouring, detecting the difference between adjacent levels is important and is governed by Weber's law, which states that detectable difference in brightness is proportional to the brightness. Weber's law suggests that a logarithmic transfer function optimizes dynamic range while rendering quantization steps imperceptible. Transfer functions according to the disclosure extend dynamic range with a smooth curve. Those functions at low brightness values are (by design) very similar to the Rec 709 curve. Over relevant ranges, preferred transfer functions approximate logarithmic curves. Transfer functions of the disclosure preferably do not result in visible contouring. Furthermore, if the peak brightness of a display using the proposed OETF is approximately a few hundred cd/rn2, then the OETF approximately corresponds to the sensitivity of the eye. Research suggests that an 8 bit version of such a transfer function should be able to produce a higher dynamic range image without visible artifacts. It should be noted that an 8 bit HDR signal would include some exposure latitude to support post processing such as grading. Application of an 8 bit transfer function via methods and devices of the disclosure will allow a higher dynamic range image to be transferred to a display via an 8 bit interface. For background, see UK Patent Publication No. GB 252047 A and Borer, 2014, Non-linear opto-electrical transfer functions for high dynamic range television, Research and Development White Paper, British Broadcasting Corporation (24 pages), both incorporated by reference. According to research and theory, using a logarithmic or approximately logarithmic transfer function, as compared to ITU-R BT 709 as shown in
By using the pipeline processing described above, in which incoming light is passed through a single lens and split onto multiple sensors to begin streaming parallel streams of HE and ME (and optionally LE) pixels into an HDR function (e.g., one or more blocks on an FPGA) and a transfer function, 8 bit HDR video can be captured, broadcast, and displayed live, meaning that live broadcasts can be performed according to existing understandings of the meanings of live broadcasting or in real-time, and in HDR. In preferred embodiments, the HDR video stream comprises HDR pixel values with light levels encoded at greater than 8 bits per color, per pixel, and the SDR video stream comprises SDR pixel values with light levels encoded at no greater than 8 bits per color, per pixel. The HDR function and the transfer function are performed in real-time on the streaming pixel values such that the SDR video stream can be received and displayed by a receiver as a live broadcast.
The output that gets broadcast is an HDR video signal because the method 101 and the apparatus 201 use multiple sensors at different exposure levels to capture multiple isomorphic images (i.e., identical but for light level) and merge them. Data from a high exposure (HE) sensor are used where portions of an image are dim and data from a mid-exposure (ME) (or lower) sensor are used where portions of an image are more brightly illuminated. The method 101 and apparatus 201 merge the HE and ME (and optionally LE) images to produce an HDR video signal. Specifically, the method 101 and the apparatus 201 identify saturated pixels in the images and replace those saturated pixels with values derived from sensors of a lower exposure. In preferred embodiments, a first pixel value from a first pixel on one of the image sensors is identified as saturated if it is at least 90% of a maximum possible pixel value. The HDR function and the transfer function are done by pipeline processing on a pixel-by-pixel basis while the streaming and transmitting steps are performed simultaneously so that the camera captures the video of a live event for display by the receiver as live playback.
In the HDR stream, HDR pixels have more than 8 bits per color and after application of the transfer function the SDR video stream comprises SDR pixels that use no more than 8 bits per pixel value. The transfer function may be a block on the FPGA 219 that applies an optical-electrical transfer function (OETF) (modifying the gamma function) to a stream of pixels, to convert a video stream with >8 bits per color to a video stream with 8 bits per color. Methods may include applying the inverse EOTF at the other end of the transmission to convert the 8 bits per color video signal into a full >8 bits signal.
For example, a video stream may have 14 bits per color, and be subject to a specific S-log transfer function (in a pipeline process, pixel-by-pixel) to convert each pixel to 8-bits per color. Then this 8-bit video signal is sent via a standard 8-bit television, cable, or satellite channel to a receiver, where the receiver would apply an inverse EOTF to produce a 14-bit signal which is displayed on a special 14-bit display. In some embodiments, the transfer function applies s-log compression, in order to compress HDR video data in the camera (which may capture at 14- or even 16-bits per color per pixel) down to 8 bits per color per pixel. The resultant 8 bit signal is transmit over a typical 8-bit broadcast TV channel (cable, satellite, over-the-air). The inverse process (s-log expansion) restores the video to its original 14- or 16-bits per color per pixel for display on an HDR TV monitor.
Various components of the apparatus 201 may be connected via a printed circuit board 205. The apparatus 201 may also include memory 221 and optionally a processor 227 (such as a general-purpose processor like an Intel chip). Apparatus 201 may further include one or more of an input-output device 239 or a display 267. Memory can include RAM or ROM and preferably includes at least one tangible, non-transitory medium. A processor may be any suitable processor known in the art, such as the processor sold under the trademark XEON E7 by Intel (Santa Clara, Calif.) or the processor sold under the trademark OPTERON 6200 by AMD (Sunnyvale, Calif.). Input/output devices according to the invention may include a video display unit (e.g., a liquid crystal display or LED display), keys, buttons, a signal generation device (e.g., a speaker, chime, or light), a touchscreen, an accelerometer, a microphone, a cellular radio frequency antenna, port for a memory card, and a network interface device, which can be, for example, a network interface card (NIC), Wi-Fi card, or cellular modem. The apparatus 201 may include or be connected to a storage device 241. The plurality of sensors are preferably provided in an arrangement that allows multiple sensors 265 to simultaneously receive images that are identical except for light level.
In some embodiments, the optical splitting system 300 uses two uncoated, 2-micron thick plastic beamsplitters that rely on Fresnel reflections at air/plastic interfaces so their actual transmittance/reflectance (T/R) values are a function of angle. Glass is also a suitable option. In one embodiment, the first beamsplitter 301 is at a 45° angle and has an approximate T/R ratio of 92/8, which means that 92% of the light from the camera lens 311 is transmitted through the first beamsplitter 301 and focused directly onto the high-exposure (HE) sensor 213. The beamsplitter 301 reflects 8% of the light from the lens 311 upwards, toward the second uncoated beamsplitter 319, which has the same optical properties as the first but is positioned at a 90° angle to the light path and has an approximate T/R ratio of 94/6.
Of the 8% of the total light that is reflected upwards, 94% (or 7.52% of the total light) is transmitted through the second beamsplitter 319 and focused onto the medium-exposure (ME) sensor 211. The other 6% of this upward-reflected light (or 0.48% of the total light) is reflected back down by the second beamsplitter 319 toward the first beamsplitter 301 (which is again at 45°), through which 92% (or 0.44% of the total light) is transmitted and focused onto the low-exposure (LE) sensor 261. With this arrangement, the HE, ME and LE sensors capture images with 92%, 7.52%, and 0.44% of the total light gathered by the camera lens 311, respectively. Therefore, the HE and ME exposures are separated by 12.2× (3.61 stops) and the ME and LE are separated by 17.0× (4.09 stops), which means that this configuration is designed to extend the dynamic range of the sensor by 7.7 stops.
This beamsplitter arrangement makes the apparatus 201 light efficient: a negligible 0.04% of the total light gathered by the lens 311 is wasted. It also allows all three sensors to “see” the same scene, so all three images are optically identical except for their light levels. Of course, the ME image has undergone an odd number of reflections and so it is flipped left-right compared to the other images, but this is fixed easily in software. In preferred embodiments, the three sensors are not gen-locked and instead independently stream incoming pixel values directly into a pipeline that includes a synchronization module. This avoids the requirement for a clock or similar triggering apparatus.
Thus it can be seen that the beamsplitter 301 directs a majority of the light to the first path and a lesser amount of the light to the second path. Preferably, the first path and the second path impinge on the HE and the ME sensor 211, respectively, to generate images that are optically identical but for light level. In the depicted embodiment, the apparatus 201 includes a low exposure (LE) sensor.
In preferred embodiments, the HE sensor 213, the ME sensor 211, and the LE sensor 261 are not gen-locked. Pixel values stream from the sensors in sequences directly to the processing device 219. Those sequences may be not synchronized as they arrive onto the processing device 219.
The method 101 may include receiving 107 incoming light through the lens 311 and splitting 113 the light via at least one beamsplitter 301 onto the multiple image sensors, wherein at least 99% of the incoming beam of light 305 is captured by the multiple image sensors.
The apparatus 201 (1) captures optically-aligned, multiple-exposure images simultaneously that do not need image manipulation to account for motion, (2) extends the dynamic range of available image sensors (by over 7 photographic stops in our current prototype), (3) is inexpensive to implement, (4) utilizes a single, standard camera lens 311, (5) efficiently uses the light from the lens 311, and (6) applies an 8-bit EOTF to provide a digital video in real time (by pipeline processing) with no visible contouring and high dynamic range.
The method 101 preferably (1) combines images separated by more than 3 stops in exposure, (2) spatially blends pre-demosaiced pixel data to reduce unwanted artifacts, (3) produces an HDR stream that is radiometrically correct, (4) uses the highest-fidelity (lowest quantized-noise) pixel data available, and (5) applies an 8-bit S-log or similar transfer function. The apparatus 201 can work with a variety of different sensor types and uses an optical architecture based on beamsplitters located between the camera lens and the sensors.
Streaming the pixel values 501 through the kernel operation 413 includes examining values from a neighborhood 601 of pixels surrounding a first pixel 615 on the HE sensor 213, finding saturated values in the neighborhood 601 of pixels, and using information from a corresponding neighborhood 613 from the ME sensor 211 to estimate a value for the first pixel 615. This will be described in greater detail below. To accomplish this, the processing device must make comparisons between corresponding pixel values from different sensors. It may be useful to stream the pixel values through the kernel operation in a fashion that places the pixel under consideration 615 adjacent to each pixel from the neighborhood 601 as well as adjacent to each pixel from the corresponding neighborhood on another sensor. For background, see Bravo, 2011, Efficient smart CMOS camera based on FPGAs oriented to embedded image processing, Sensors 11:2282-2303; Lyu, 2014, A 12-bit high-speed column parallel two-step single-slope analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for CMOS image sensors, Sensors 14:21603-21625; Ab Rahman, 2011, Pipeline synthesis and optimization of FPGA-based video processing applications with CAL, EURASIP J Image Vid Processing 19:1-28; Schulte, 2016, HDR Demystified: Emerging UHDTV systems, SpectraCal 1-22; U.S. Pub. 2017/0237890; U.S. Pub. 2017/0238029; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,982,962 to Gish, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference.
References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Various modifications of the invention and many further embodiments thereof, in addition to those shown and described herein, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the full contents of this document, including references to the scientific and patent literature cited herein. The subject matter herein contains important information, exemplification and guidance that can be adapted to the practice of this invention in its various embodiments and equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/680,242, filed Jun. 4, 2018, the contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2560351 | Kell | Jul 1951 | A |
2642487 | Schroeder | Jun 1953 | A |
2971051 | Back | Feb 1961 | A |
3202039 | DeLang | Aug 1965 | A |
3381084 | Wheeler | Apr 1968 | A |
3474451 | Abel | Oct 1969 | A |
3601480 | Randall | Aug 1971 | A |
3653748 | Athey | Apr 1972 | A |
3659918 | Tan | May 1972 | A |
3668304 | Eilenberger | Jun 1972 | A |
3720146 | Yost, Jr. | Mar 1973 | A |
3802763 | Cook et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3945034 | Suzuki | Mar 1976 | A |
4009941 | Verdijk et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4072405 | Ozeki | Feb 1978 | A |
4084180 | Stoffels et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4134683 | Goetz et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4268119 | Hartmann | May 1981 | A |
4395234 | Shenker | Jul 1983 | A |
4396188 | Dreissigacker et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4486069 | Neil et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4555163 | Wagner | Nov 1985 | A |
4584606 | Nagasaki | Apr 1986 | A |
4743011 | Coffey | May 1988 | A |
4786813 | Svanberg et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4805037 | Noble et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4916529 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4933751 | Shinonaga et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5024530 | Mende | Jun 1991 | A |
5092581 | Koz | Mar 1992 | A |
5093563 | Small et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5134468 | Ohmuro | Jul 1992 | A |
5153621 | Vogeley | Oct 1992 | A |
5155623 | Miller et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5194959 | Kaneko et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5272518 | Vincent | Dec 1993 | A |
5386316 | Cook | Jan 1995 | A |
5642191 | Mende | Jun 1997 | A |
5707322 | Dreissigacker et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5729011 | Sekiguchi | Mar 1998 | A |
5734507 | Harvey | Mar 1998 | A |
5801773 | Ikeda | Sep 1998 | A |
5835278 | Rubin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5856466 | Cook et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881043 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900942 | Spiering | May 1999 | A |
5905490 | Shu et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926283 | Hopkins | Jul 1999 | A |
5929908 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6011876 | Kishner | Jan 2000 | A |
6215597 | Duncan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6392687 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6646716 | Ramanujan et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6674487 | Smith | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6747694 | Nishikawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801719 | Szajewski et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6856466 | Tocci | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7068890 | Soskind et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084905 | Nayar et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7138619 | Ferrante et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7177085 | Tocci et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7283307 | Couture et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7336299 | Kostrzewski et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7397509 | Krymski | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405882 | Uchiyama et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7714998 | Furman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719674 | Furman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7731637 | D'Eredita | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7961398 | Tocci | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8035711 | Liu et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8320047 | Tocci | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340442 | Rasche | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8441732 | Tocci | May 2013 | B2 |
8606009 | Sun | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8610789 | Nayar et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8619368 | Tocci | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622876 | Kelliher | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8659683 | Linzer | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8982962 | Alshin et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9087229 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9129445 | Mai et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9131150 | Mangiat et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9277122 | Imura et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9459692 | Li | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9560339 | Borowski | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9661245 | Kawano | May 2017 | B2 |
9675236 | McDowall | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9677840 | Rublowsky et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9720231 | Erinjippurath et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9948829 | Kiser et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955084 | Haynold | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9974996 | Kiser | May 2018 | B2 |
20020014577 | Ulrich et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020089765 | Nalwa | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030007254 | Tocci | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016334 | Weber et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030048493 | Pontifex et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072011 | Shirley | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040119020 | Bodkin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125228 | Dougherty | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143380 | Stam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179834 | Szajewski et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050001983 | Weber et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041113 | Nayar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050099504 | Nayar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117799 | Fuh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151860 | Silverstein et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050157943 | Ruggiero | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168578 | Gobush | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050212827 | Goertzen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219659 | Quan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060001761 | Haba et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060002611 | Mantiuk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060061680 | Madhavan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104508 | Daly et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060184040 | Keller et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209204 | Ward | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221209 | McGuire et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249652 | Schleifer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262275 | Domroese et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070025717 | Raskar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070086087 | Dent et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070189750 | Wong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189758 | Iwasaki | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201560 | Segall et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258641 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080013051 | Glinski et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030611 | Jenkins | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055683 | Choe et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094486 | Fuh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100910 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112651 | Cho et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080175496 | Segall | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198235 | Chen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198266 | Kurane | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080297460 | Peng et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090059048 | Luo et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090213225 | Jin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225433 | Tocci | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244717 | Tocci | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090290043 | Liu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100201799 | Mohrholz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225783 | Wagner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271512 | Garten | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100328780 | Tocci | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028278 | Roach | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058050 | Lasang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110188744 | Sun | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110194618 | Gish et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221793 | King, III et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120025080 | Liu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120134551 | Wallace | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147953 | El-Mahdy et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179833 | Kenrick et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120212964 | Chang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120241867 | Ono et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120242867 | Shuster | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120260174 | Imaida | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120299940 | Dietrich, Jr. et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130021447 | Brisedoux et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021505 | Plowman et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038689 | McDowall | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130063300 | O'Regan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093805 | Iversen | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094705 | Tyagi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130194675 | Tocci | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250113 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130286451 | Verhaegh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130329053 | Jones et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002694 | Levy et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140063300 | Lin et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085422 | Aronsson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140132946 | Sebastian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140152694 | Narasimha et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168486 | Geiss | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184894 | Motta | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192214 | Laroia | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198187 | Lukk | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210847 | Knibbeler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140263950 | Fenigstein et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140313369 | Kageyama et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150201222 | Mertens | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150208024 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150245043 | Greenebaum et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245044 | Guo | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150296140 | Kim | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150302562 | Zhai et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312498 | Kawano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312536 | Butler et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160007052 | Haitsuka et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160050354 | Musatenko et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057333 | Liu et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160163356 | De Haan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173811 | Oh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205368 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160252727 | Mack et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160323518 | Rivard et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160345032 | Tsukagoshi | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353123 | Ninan | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360212 | Dai et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160375297 | Kiser | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170006273 | Borer et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170070719 | Smolic et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170126987 | Tan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170155818 | Bonnet | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170155873 | Nguyen | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170186141 | Ha et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170237879 | Kiser et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237890 | Kiser et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237913 | Kiser et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238029 | Kiser et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170279530 | Tsukagoshi | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170302858 | Porter et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180048801 | Kiser | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180152721 | Rusanovskyy | May 2018 | A1 |
20180198957 | Kiser et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20200219236 | Olivier | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101344706 | Sep 2010 | CN |
0484802 | May 1992 | EP |
1225574 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1395062 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2526047 | Nov 2015 | GB |
2539917 | Jan 2017 | GB |
S53093026 | Aug 1978 | JP |
S53124028 | Oct 1978 | JP |
S60213178 | Oct 1985 | JP |
S63160489 | Jul 1988 | JP |
H0468876 | Mar 1992 | JP |
H0564070 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H06335006 | Dec 1994 | JP |
H07107346 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H08220585 | Aug 1996 | JP |
H11127441 | May 1999 | JP |
2000019407 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000338313 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001136434 | May 2001 | JP |
2002165108 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003035881 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2007295326 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2005025685 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2009111642 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009121068 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2011032028 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2012076646 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2015072754 | May 2015 | WO |
2015173570 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2017139596 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017157845 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Borer, 2014, Non-linear opto-electrical transfer functions for high dynamic range television, Research and Development White Paper, British Broadcasting Corporation (24 pages). |
Bravo, 2011, Efficient smart CMOS camera based on FPGAs oriented to embedded image processing, Sensors 11:2282-2303. |
Lyu, 2014, A 12-bit high-speed column parallel two-step single-slope analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for CMOS image sensors, Sensors 14:21603-21625. |
Rahman, 2011, Pipeline synthesis and optimization of FPGA-based video processing applications with CAL, EURASIP J Image Vid Processing 19:1-28. |
Schulte, 2016, HDR Demystified: Emerging UHDTV systems, SpectraCal 1-22. |
Sony, 2017, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Sony Corporation (16 pages). |
Abstract of JP 2000019407 A (2 pages). |
Abstract of JP 2003035881 A (2 pages). |
Abstract of JP S60213178 A (2 pages). |
Aggarwal, 2004, Split Aperture Imaging for High Dynamic Range, Int J Comp Vis 58(1):7-17. |
Alleysson, 2006, HDR CFA Image Rendering, Proc EURASIP 14th European Signal Processing Conf. |
Banterle, 2009, High dynamic range imaging and low dynamic range expansion for generating HDR content, Eurographics State of the The Art Report (18 pages). |
Debevec, 1997, Recovering High Dynamic Range Radiance Maps from Photographs, Int Conf Comp Graphics and Interactive Techniques, proceedings. |
Flux Data Inc, 2008, FD-1665 High Resolution 3 CCD Multispectral Industrial Camera, web.archive.orgweb20080113023949www.fluxdata.com/prod (7 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 14, 2017, for PCT/US17/17396 filed Feb. 10, 2017 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 28, 2017, for PCT/US17/17405, filed Feb. 10, 2017 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 2, 2017, for PCT/US17/16991, filed Feb. 8, 2017 (7 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 8, 2017, for PCT/US17/17400 filed Feb. 10, 2017 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 23, 2017, for International application No. PCT/US17/45683, with International filing date Aug. 7, 2017 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 20, 2018, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/041034 (10 pages). |
Kao, 2008, High Dynamic Range Imaging by Fusing Multiple Raw Images and Tone Reproduction, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 54(1):10-15. |
Lukac, 2004, Demosaicked Image Postprocessing Using Local Color Ratios, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14(6):914-920. |
Machine translation of CN 101344706 B, generated on May 19, 2017, by espacenet (11 pages). |
Machine translation of JP 2000019407 A generated on May 30, 2017, by EPO website (52 pages). |
Machine translation of JP 2000338313 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacenet (9 pages). |
Machine translation of JP 2001136434 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacent (25 pages). |
Machine translation of JP 2002165108 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacenet (27 pages). |
Machine translation of JP 2003035881 A genertaed on May 30, 2017, by EPO website (19 pages). |
Machine translation of JP 2007295326 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by the European Patent Office website Espacent (12 pages). |
Machine translation of JP H04068876 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacent (8 pages). |
Machine translation of JP H0564070 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacenet (19 pages). |
Machine translation of JP H06335006 A generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacenet (9 pages). |
Machine translation of JP H07107346 generated on Dec. 21, 2016, by Espacent (21 pages). |
Machine translation of JP S53093026 A, issued as JP S599888, generated on Dec. 21, 2016 (5 pages). |
Machine translation of JP S60213178 A generated on May 30, 2017, by EPO website (6 pages). |
Myszkowki, 2008, High Dynamic Range Video, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA (158 pages). |
Nayar, 2000, High dynamic range imaging: spatially varying pixel exposures, 2000 Proc IEEE Conf on Comp Vision and Pattern Rec, ISSN: 1063-6919. |
Stumpfel, 2004, Direct HDR Capture of the Sun and Sky, Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa (9 pages). |
Tiwari, 2015, A review on high-dynamic range imaging with its technique, Int J Sig Proc, IPPR 8(9):93-100. |
Tocci, 2011, A versatile HDR video production system, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2011, 30(4):article 41. |
Touze, 2014, HDR video coding based on local LDR quantization, Second International Conference and SME Workshop on HDR imaging. |
Extended European Search Report for EP 17750845.4 dated Aug. 19, 2019 (8 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for EP 17750846.2 dated Aug. 19, 2019 (9 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 19, 2019, for European patent application No. 17750844.7 (10 pages). |
Int Search Report & Written Op dated Sep. 11, 2019, for PCT/US19/35109, filed Jun. 3, 2019 (10 pages). |
Machine translation of JP H08 220585 A obtained Feb. 3, 2020, from Espacenet (14 pages). |
Machine translation of JPH08220585 generated by European Patent Office on Oct. 15, 2019 (11 pages). |
Sony, 2017, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Sony Corporation (15 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190373260 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62680242 | Jun 2018 | US |