The present invention relates to a compressed netting sleeve for in situ manufacture of compost filter socks and a method of forming compost filter socks using same and to onsite storage of residual sleeve material.
A compost filter sock (also called a compost filter sleeve, or silt sleeve, or filter sock, compost filter tube, compost mesh sleeve, or similar terms) is a type of contained compost filter berm. A compost filter sock is a mesh tube or netting sleeve filled with mostly composted material and that is conventionally placed perpendicular to sheet-flow runoff to control erosion and retain sediment in disturbed areas. The idea of a filter sock formed as a mesh tube filled with compost material as the filler goes at least as far back as 1935 in a patent application by Mark S. Willing for a “means for preventing soil erosion.” At that time, the time of the “dust bowl” in the central United States, soil erosion was a big problem in the United States and wind and water erosion was destroying large swaths of cropland. Mr. Willing's early compost filter sock U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,079,779 and 2,201,279, which are incorporated herein by reference, disclosed the use of brush or bundled weeds as the compost filler for these early filter socks.
Over the years improvements have been developed giving further detail to filler material, opening size in the frameless mesh, length and size of filters, installation instructions. See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 3,957,098, which is incorporated herein by reference, disclosing a 1972 development of an erosion control bag having a porosity of 10 to 35 cubic feet per minute so that air and water may escape from the bag as water and a filler are pumped into the bag. U.S. Pat. No. 4,044,525, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a 1975 development wherein wood chips are blown from the discharge tube of the wood chipper straight into a tube-like package which has perforated walls allowing the air carrying the wood chips to escape from the package while the chips are retained inside the package. The analogous oil skimming/spill absorbing field, which used absorbent material (including compostable material) in netting, has also yielded improvements relevant to compost filter socks as evidenced in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,617,566, 3,739,913, 4,366,067, and 4,659,478, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Within the last 30 years, tubular compost filter socks filled with straw and hammered wood have been introduced. In the late 1990's filter berms where introduced. The berm was basically a triangular windrowed pile of decomposing organic material from land clearing, tree-trimming, or other sources. Some of the people doing work early in the evolution and proliferation and re-introduction of modern compost filter sock were John Engwer at FilterMitt, Kevin Lane at Lane ECS, Tom Truelsen at Soil Tek, Rod Tyler at Filtrexx, Keith and Kevin Weaver at Weaver Express, and Doug Cadwell at River Valley Organics. Soon a “modern day” tubular mesh fabric holding in place the berm material was introduced and the term “Compost Filter Sock” began to be used. Today's compost filter sock is a modern day version of the original Willing patents.
Maine was one of the first states to embrace compost filter socks and associated standards. In the past 10-15 years, most other states have followed suit. As of 2014, at least one Standard Setting Organization (SSO) in every state has adopted a “Compost Filter Sock” standard.
The modern compost filter socks are typically oval in cross section, once formed, although the netting sleeve is often circular in cross section prior to filling. A compost filter sock, provides a three-dimensional filter that retains sediment and other pollutants (e.g., suspended solids, nutrients, and motor oil) while allowing the cleaned water to flow through (See Faucette, et al. 2005. Evaluation of Storm water from Compost and Conventional Erosion Control Practices in Construction Activities, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60:6, 288-297; and Tyler, R. and B. Faucette 2005. Organic BMPs used for Storm water Management—Filter Media Test Results from Private Certification Program Yield Predictable Performance, U.S. Composting Council 13th Annual Conference and Trade Show, January 2005, San Antonio, Tex.).
The compost filter socks are used in place of a traditional sediment and erosion control tool, such as a silt fence or straw bale barrier. Composts used in compost filter socks are conventionally made from a variety of feed-stocks, including municipal yard trimmings, food residuals, separated municipal solid waste, bio-solids, and manure. Compost filter socks are generally placed along the perimeter of a site, or at intervals along a slope, to capture and treat storm-water that runs off as sheet flow. Compost filter socks are flexible and can be filled in place or filled and moved into position, making them especially useful on steep or rocky slopes where installation of other erosion control tools is not feasible. There is greater surface area contact with soil than typical sediment control devices, thereby reducing the potential for runoff to create rills under the device and/or create channels carrying unfiltered sediment. Additionally, compost filter socks can be laid adjacent to each other, perpendicular to storm-water flow, to reduce flow velocity and soil erosion. Compost filter socks can also be used on pavement as inlet protection for storm drains and to slow water flow in small ditches.
Compost filter socks used for erosion control are most commonly 12 inches in diameter, although 8 inch, 18 inch, and 24 inch diameter compost filter socks are used in some applications. The smaller 8 inch diameter filter socks are commonly used as storm-water inlet protection. The “diameter” of the compost filter sock is typically given as the diameter of the unfilled netting sleeve used to form the compost filter sock, as in position, gravity will make the cross section take an oval or “D” shape in which the width of the device exceeds the original diameter and the height of the device is less than the original diameter.
Compost filter socks can be what are termed “vegetated” or “un-vegetated”. Vegetated compost filter socks can be left in place to provide long-term filtration of storm-water as a post-construction best management practice. The vegetation grows into the slope, further anchoring the compost filter sock. Un-vegetated compost filter socks are often cut open when the project is completed, and the compost filling is spread around the site as soil amendment or mulch. The netting sleeve is then disposed of unless it is biodegradable.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System description of Construction Site Storm-water Runoff Control, three advantages the compost filter sock has over traditional sediment control tools, such as a silt fence, are: i) Installation does not require disturbing the soil surface (no trenching), which reduces erosion; ii) It is easily removed; and iii) The operator must dispose of only a relatively small volume of material, if any. These advantages lead to cost savings, either through reduced labor or disposal costs.
Further, the use of compost provides additional benefits. The compost retains a large volume of water, which helps prevent or reduce rill erosion and aids in establishing vegetation on the filter sock. The mix of particle sizes in the compost filter material retains as much or more sediment than traditional perimeter controls, such as silt fences or hay bale barriers, while allowing a larger volume of clear water to pass through (Silt fences often become clogged with sediment and form a dam that retains storm-water, rather than letting the filtered storm-water pass through). In addition to retaining sediment, compost can retain pollutants such as heavy metals, nitrogen, phosphorus, oil and grease, fuels, herbicides, pesticides, and other potentially hazardous substances—improving the downstream water quality. Nutrients and hydrocarbons adsorbed and/or trapped by the compost filter can be naturally cycled and decomposed through bioremediation by microorganisms commonly found in the compost matrix.
Compost filter socks are applicable to construction sites or other disturbed areas where storm-water runoff occurs as sheet flow. Common industry practice for compost filter devices is that drainage areas do not exceed 0.25 acre per 100 feet of device length and flow does not exceed one cubic foot per second. Compost filter socks can be used on steeper slopes with faster flows if they are spaced more closely, stacked beside and/or on top of each other, made in larger diameters, or used in combination with other storm-water controls, such as compost blankets. Once the filter sock is filled and put in place, it should be anchored to the slope. The preferred anchoring method is to drive stakes through the center of the sock at regular intervals; alternatively, stakes can be placed on the downstream side of the sock. The ends of the filter sock should be directed upslope, to prevent storm-water from running around the end of the sock. The filter sock may be vegetated by incorporating seed into the compost prior to placement in the filter sock. Since compost filter socks do not have to be trenched into the ground, they can be installed on frozen ground or even on cement or other “inhospitable” surfaces.
Compost filter socks offer a large degree of flexibility for various applications. A large number of qualitative studies have reported the effectiveness of compost filter socks in removing settleable solids and total suspended solids from storm-water. These studies have consistently shown that compost filter socks are generally more effective than traditional erosion and sediment control systems. Compost filter socks are often used in conjunction with compost blankets to form a storm-water management system. Together, these two systems retain a very high volume of storm-water, sediment, and other pollutants. For further background see, Alexander, R. 2003. Standard Specifications for Compost for Erosion/Sediment Control developed for the Recycled Materials Resource Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, N.H.; Alexander, R. 2001. Compost Use on State Highway Applications, Composting Council Research and Education Fund and U.S. Composting Council, Harrisburg, Pa.; AASHTO. 2003 Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, Designation MP-9, Compost for Erosion/Sediment Control (Filter Berms), Provisional, American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C; Glanville et al. 2003. Impacts of Compost Blankets on Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Water Quality at Highway Construction Sites in Iowa, T. Glanville, T. Richard, and R. Persyn, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa; Juries, D. 2004. Environmental Protection and Enhancement with Compost, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Northwest Region; McCoy, S. 2005. Filter Sock Presentation provided at Erosion, Sediment Control and Stormwater Management with Compost BMPs Workshop, U.S. Composting Council 13th Annual Conference and Trade Show, January 2005, San Antonio, Tex.; MnDOT. 2005. Storm Drain Inlet Protection Provisions, S-5.5 Materials, B. Compost Log, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Engineering Services Division, Technical Memorandum No. 05-05-ENV-03, Jan. 18, 2005; ODEQ. 2004. Best Management Practices for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity, Guidance for Eliminating or Reducing Pollutants in Stormwater Discharges, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Northwest Region; USCC. 2001. Compost Use on State Highway Applications, U.S. Composting Council, Washington, D.C; USEPA. 1998. An Analysis of Composting as an Environmental Remediation Technology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W), EPA530-R-98-008, April 1998; and W&H Pacific. 1993. Demonstration Project Using Yard Debris Compost for Erosion Control, Final Report, presented to Metropolitan Service District, Portland, Oreg. The details of making the conventional compost filter socks are also described in some detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,226,240 and 7,452,165 which are incorporated herein by reference.
Compost filter socks are assembled by tying a knot in one end of the mesh sock, filling the sock with the composted material, typically usually using a pneumatic blower then knotting the other end once the desired length is reached. Often this is done in-situ by having a pneumatic blower on site, which in this context is also called a blower truck as it is typically mounted on a vehicle. The appropriate compost is delivered to the site in bulk, or manufactured at the site (which minimizes waste removal from vegetation removal during site preparation), or a combination of these. The netting sleeve is also delivered to the site and typically comes in large rolls or coils. The operator of the pneumatic blower must unravel an entire length of netting sleeve from the coil, and then load the entire desired netting sleeve length onto the nozzle of the blower to form what is referenced herein as a compression bundle. Once “loaded” the leading end and knot the end before beginning filing. The trailing end is knotted after the compost filter sock of the desired length is formed. Further, the operators do not have a convenient method of storing the residual length of netting sleeve after the day/job has been completed, and this can lead to the loss of considerable amount of unused netting between “runs”.
There remains a need in the art for a cost effective method to distribute the netting sleeves used to form compost filter socks and facilitate the construction of compost filter socks in situ.
This invention is directed to a method of forming a vacuum packed compressed netting sleeve for in situ formation of a compost filter sock which comprises the steps of: providing a sleeve of netting material having at least one open end; bunching the sleeve of netting material primarily along a longitudinal axis, whereby each open end of the netting material remains accessible to form a compression bundle netting material; placing the compression bundle netting material in a re-sealable weatherproof bag; drawing a vacuum in the bag to compress the compression bundle netting material; and sealing the bag.
A mechanical fastener capable of securing a compression bundle netting sleeve in position may be provided within in the bag. The bag may efficiently store remnants of the netting sleeve at the end of given manufacturing runs.
The invention is also directed towards a method of forming a compressed netting sleeve for in situ formation of a compost filter sock comprising the steps of: providing a sleeve of netting material having two open ends; bunching the sleeve of netting material primarily along a longitudinal axis, whereby each open end of the netting material remains accessible to form a compression bundle netting material; and forming a shape holding sleeve of a torus or donut shape from the compression bundle netting material by one of i) drawing one open end of the netting material through the open interior and through the other open end then wrapped around the exterior at least once; ii) securing the compression bundle netting sleeve in position within in the bag with a mechanical fastener which is one of a twist tie, cable tie, hose tie, zip tie or tie-wrap; and iii) securing the compression bundle netting sleeve in position within in the bag with an encapsulating mesh protective sleeve.
The invention is also directed towards a method of manufacturing a compost filter sock comprising the steps of: providing a bag containing a compression bundle netting sleeve; removing the compression bundle netting sleeve from the bag; placing the compression bundle netting sleeve on a pneumatic nozzle; removing one open end and a leading length of the netting sleeve from the pneumatic nozzle while maintaining the opposite end and the remainder of the netting sleeve on the pneumatic nozzle; sealing the open end; filling the netting sleeve with compost; and sealing the remaining open end.
The phrase “compression bundle” within the meaning of this application refers to compressing or bunching of netting sleeve material primarily along a longitudinal axis thereof whereby each open end and the opening there between remains accessible. The phrase “rolled sleeve” within the meaning of this patent application references a compression bundle sleeve in which one open end is drawn through the center through the open interior and through the other open end and wrapped at least once around the exterior to form a donut or torus shaped self shape holding structure.
The features that characterize the present invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims which are part of this disclosure. These and other features of the invention, its operating advantages and the specific objects obtained by its use will be more fully understood from the following detailed description in connection with the attached figures.
As noted above the phrase “compression bundle” within the meaning of this application refers to compressing or bunching of netting sleeve material 12 primarily along a longitudinal axis thereof whereby each open end 14 and the opening there between, generally 16, remains accessible. As described below the “rolled sleeve” 10 within the meaning of this patent application references a compression bundle netting material sleeve in which one open end 14 is drawn through the center through the open interior 16 and through the other open end 14 and wrapped at least once around the exterior to form a donut or torus shaped self shape holding structure as shown in
The essence of the formation of the vacuum packed compressed netting sleeve of the present invention can be summarized as “SLEEVE IT, HOLD IT, VACUUM PACK IT”™ which is a mark used by the applicant in promoting the compression bundle netting sleeve of the present invention.
Sleeve It
Hold It
An alternative version of the present invention, rather than forming the rolled sleeve 10, is to secure a mechanical fastener 18 around the compression bundle netting sleeve to hold the compression bundle sleeve in position as generally shown in
A further alternative of the present invention, rather than forming the rolled sleeve 10, is to wrap a protective holding sleeve 32 around the compression bundle netting sleeve to hold the compression bundle sleeve in position as generally shown in
Vacuum Pack It
After the compression bundle netting material is held in place through the formation of a rolled sleeve 10 or through a mechanical fastener 18 or through use of protective holding sleeve 32, it is placed in a sealable vacuum bag 20. There are two embodiments of the bag 20. One is a resealable bag 20 with the resealing closure 22 (generally downstream of an original sealing line formed with original packaging). A second bag 20 type is effectively formed from a tube member with one end being heat sealed the bag then cut to length from the tube of material and filled and sealed. The use of tube material for forming bags 20 allows the system to easily form distinct sizes of product as the bags 20 will be individually customized to the desired size. The disadvantage of the tube of material is that is prevents the easy incorporation of resealing mechanism—however the resealing may not be desired, or worth the extra cost in all applications and the cost savings of customizable sealed bags 20 from a single tube of material be beneficial.
An unused fastener 18 may be placed into the sealable bag 20 to allow the user an easy mechanism to hold the compression bundle shape of a remainder of the netting material 12 after the job is completed. The remnant piece of material 12 may be several hundred feet long and the use of a fastener 18 and sealable bag 20 can allow for efficient storage and easy reuse of remnant pieces of sufficient length, particularly if a resealable bag 20 is used. Such use is shown in
Following the provision of the rolled sleeve 10, or a compression bundle with fastener 18 or a compression bundle with protective holding sleeve 32, within the bag 20, a vacuum is drawn within the bag 20 to compress the compression bundle or rolled sleeve 10 and the volume reduced bag 20 is sealed. The sealing is easily accomplished with a heat sealing, and if the closure 22 is present then the sealing line is closer to the end than the closure. In some bags 20 the closure 22 itself may be used to seal the bag 20, however this requires the closure to be designed to hold the vacuum and may unnecessarily increase the cost of the bag 20. Heat sealing spaced from the closure 22 allows the closure 22 to only be sufficient for sealing. Further as identified above, the use of a tube of material for forming customizable bags 20 with two heat sealed ends is very cost effective, but generally eliminates the resealing aspects of the bag 20 by eliminating the closure 22. The shape of the rolled sleeve 10 allows for effective vacuum packing of the present invention which in turn results in substantial reduction in volume and associated reduction in shipping costs and ease in provision of material 12 to the field, which field location may and often is a remote, difficult to access location.
Pneumatic Nozzle Loading
The self holding compressed netting sleeve material 12 allows for rapid loading of the pneumatic nozzle in the field.
Following this loading, one open end 14 and a leading length of the netting sleeve 12 is removed or pulled from from the pneumatic nozzle while maintaining the opposite end 14 and the remainder of the netting sleeve 12 on the pneumatic nozzle. For the rolled sleeve 10 this entails un-wrapping the leading open end 14, effectively reversing the process used to form the rolled sleeve 10, as shown in the sequential steps of
The next step for forming a compost filter sock is sealing the leading open end 14 such as by simply tying a knot 26 in the leading length as shown in
Once loaded the compost filter sock is formed in a conventional fashion by filling the netting sleeve 12 with compost using the nozzle (and a supply of compost from a hopper or storage area). After a filter sock of a desired length has been formed the trailing end of the netting material 12 is sealed, such as by another knot 26. IF there is a substantial length of unused netting material 12 after formation of the compost filter sock of a desired length then the material may be severed, generally near where the trailing knot 26 is to be formed and the remaining length of material 12 forming a reusable remnant.
As discussed above the present invention easily accommodates storage of relevant lengths of remnant material 12 after a job is completed. Small remnant lengths will likely be scrapped, or possibly used to fill a leading end of the next compost filter sock.
While the invention has been shown in several particular embodiments it should be clear that various modifications may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereto.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/449,288, abandoned, filed Aug. 1, 2014 entitled “Method of Forming a Vacuum Packed Compressed Netting Sleeve for In Situ Manufacture of Compost Filter Socks and Method of Forming Compost Filter Socks Using Same” and which published on Feb. 19, 2015 as U.S. patent Publication Number 2015/0047298, which publication is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/449,288 claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/866,463 entitled “Method of Forming a Vacuum Packed Compressed Netting Sleeve for In Situ Manufacture of Compost Filter Socks and Method of Forming Compost Filter Socks Using Same” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2079779 | Tullis | May 1937 | A |
2201279 | Willing | May 1940 | A |
2425301 | Browner | Aug 1947 | A |
2627153 | Stencil | Feb 1953 | A |
3097644 | Parker | Jul 1963 | A |
3263682 | Rosenfield | Aug 1966 | A |
3407562 | Di Nicola | Oct 1968 | A |
3617566 | Oshima et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3739913 | Bogosian | Jun 1973 | A |
3794268 | McNeill | Feb 1974 | A |
3957098 | Hepworth et al. | May 1976 | A |
4044525 | Forsgren | Aug 1977 | A |
4174416 | Mercer | Nov 1979 | A |
4247005 | Buxton | Jan 1981 | A |
4366067 | Golding et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4659478 | Stapelfeld et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4790105 | Wareing | Dec 1988 | A |
5009058 | Ptaschek | Apr 1991 | A |
5692606 | Elmaleh | Dec 1997 | A |
5727277 | Chlen | Mar 1998 | A |
5782067 | Fuss | Jul 1998 | A |
5867825 | Scheerer | Feb 1999 | A |
5899049 | Fuss | May 1999 | A |
6044525 | Sastre | Apr 2000 | A |
6092257 | Chen | Jul 2000 | A |
6182421 | Sullivan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7178224 | Bussey, Jr. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7226240 | Tyler | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7452165 | Tyler | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7600308 | Bussey, Jr. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20040026292 | Ours | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079699 | Engwer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107675 | Nelson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050155327 | Snell | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060021292 | Norton | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060075620 | Bussey, Jr. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105690 | Wince | May 2006 | A1 |
20080098691 | Pinto | May 2008 | A1 |
20080152267 | Shannon | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080236103 | Lowder | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090308769 | Mitter | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110085749 | Frei | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120020745 | Miller | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
EPA, Stormwater Best Management Practice Compost Blankets, www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/compostblankets.pdfOffice of Water, 4203M, EPA 833-F-11-007, Mar. 2012. |
EPA, Water: Best Managment Practices, Compost Filter Socks, http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/swbmp/Compost-Filter-Socks.cfm, Tuesday, Jul. 1, 2014. |
EPA, Water: Best Management Practices, Compost Filter Berms, http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/swbmp/Compost-Filter-Berms.cfm, Tuesday, Jul. 1, 2014. |
US Composting Council, USCC factsheet: Using Compost in Stormwater Management, http://www.sandiego.gov/environmental-services/pdf/miramar/CompostStormwaterManagement.pdf, Copyright © 2008 The United States Composting Council. |
Dr. Britt Faucette, Temporary Barriers as BMPs, Revisited, http://www.erosioncontrol.com/EC/Articles/Temporary_Barriers_as_BMPs_Revisited_9264.aspx, Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170298589 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61866463 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14449288 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15631705 | US |