Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The present invention relates to foundations for mattresses, and more particularly to foundations made of foam that may be compressed and folded into dimensions more suitable for shipping and storage.
Prior art mattress foundations have typically been produced using hard materials like wood and plastic which must be assembled before they are able to support a mattress. These known mattress foundations typically consist of a rectangular frame with a series of slats spanning the width of the rigid frame so that the foundation frame sits on and spans a standard bed frame and a mattress is supported by the slats on the top side of the foundation. Other types of known foundations substitute the series of slats for one or more cross beams or a single panel of rigid material which may be known as a platform mattress foundation. Additionally, some known mattress foundations combine the rigid frame and cross members with supporting springs and are known as “box springs.” These box springs are designed to provide more ergonomic support as they may flex when certain amounts of force are applied to the supported mattress, but the rigidity of the frame and stiffness of the springs still prevent folding and compression that equates to the compactness of the compressible foam mattress foundation described herein. Some of these mattress foundations with rigid support members can be disassembled for storage, shipment, and delivery, but these rigid foundations must then be assembled for use.
Some current mattress foundations include foam as a primary support material for the mattress rather than the rectangular frame with slats as described above. However, these foam foundation assemblies include a rigid panel base that spans the entire area within the periphery of the foam block (lengthwise and crosswise). For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,106,139 discloses a foam foundation, but the panel base connected to the foundation within the cover is rigid and prevents the foundation from being folded for easier shipping and storage. As seen in US Pat. Pub. No. 2004/0055086, separate foam foundation modules have individual panel bases that are connected together by hinged fasteners that allow the modules to be folded. Although adjacent panel bases are connected together by fasteners, foam blocks in adjacent modules are not connected in order to permit the modules' adjacent panel bases to be folded together at the hinged fasteners without folding the foam blocks. The folded foundation modules can be stored, shipped, and delivered and then unfolded when ready for use. The folding of the modules reduces the length of the packaged foundation which helps in the delivery of each foundation but does not necessarily reduce the volume of space it takes for storing and shipping a large group of foundations.
Although the foldable foam-panel modules disclosed by the '086 Application may have an advantage over the unfoldable foam-panel structure disclosed by the '139 Patent by helping in the delivery of foam foundations, it also introduces discontinuities in the support of the mattress because of the multiple sections of foam. None of the prior art references consider using a single, unitary foam block for a foundation with multiple separate support beams that are not directly connected to each other but are only connected to each other through their attachment to the unitary foam block. Prior to the present invention, the conventional thoughts in the bedding industry had been that panels should cover the entire surface area within the periphery of the foam block to properly support the foam block and avoid sagging due to lack of some rigid support across the entire lengthwise and crosswise dimensions of the panel. Even in the '139 Patent which has a corrugated bottom surface with grooves in the surface which do not contact the panel, the panel or some other structural support spans the entire surface area within the foam block's periphery, lengthwise and crosswise, and provides rigidity to the foundation assembly in both the lengthwise and crosswise dimensions.
It has also been known to compress and fold foam mattresses so that they can be stored, shipped, and delivered in a compact form. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,067 by Magni and US Pat. Pub. No. 2015/0015402 by Boyd each describe compressible mattress variations having fluid chambers for air or other materials that provide skeletal support to the mattress while supporting foam layers and supplemental cushion layers work in concert to provide a comfortable and stable sleeping surface. The '067 Patent particularly describes a mattress that can be compressed and squeezed into an elastic wrapper and subsequently rolled into a more manageable shape for insertion into a shipping container. Although the primary innovation of the '067 Patent is directed to the method for stowing different varieties of mattresses, the mattresses themselves combine various supporting and cushion layers of artificial or natural fibers to ensure the comfort of the user when the mattress is unwrapped.
Similarly, the '402 Application describes a compressible mattress having a foam body made out of a polyurethane, latex, gel-filled or similar viscoelastic foam with elongated chambers filled with gas, liquid, gel or another foam to provide additional rigidity to the mattress structure. However, because the mattress described in the '402 Application must be comfortable to the sleeper while also being sturdy enough to maintain its form, a foam cushion sheet or cover overlays the top of the foam body. In various embodiments of the mattress described in the '402 Application, multiple support and cushion layers having differing indentation force deflections are used together to provide both support and comfort to the sleeper.
Despite these innovations, prior to the present invention, the bedding industry has never been able to both compress and fold foam foundations to the same degree as foam mattresses because the rigid panels or outer rigid framework with interior slats that have traditionally been used for foam foundations had required the rigidity in both the lengthwise and the crosswise dimensions. Similarly, mattresses inherently provide comfort to sleepers and thereby require supporting foam layers along with cushion layers that have differing indentation force deflection to provide both comfort and support. Thus, there has remained a need for a foam foundation that could be folded and compressed to be stored, shipped, and delivered in a compact form and then unfolded and expanded into a usable configuration that provides support to the mattress and has sufficient rigidity spanning the bed frame in either a lengthwise or crosswise dimension to avoid sagging. It would be beneficial to have a compressible foam foundation that does not require a lengthwise and crosswise rigid frame or panels beneath the foam block, or does not require a frame that must be assembled before the foundation can be used to support a mattress on a bed frame.
According to the invention described herein, a foundation for a mattress is formed from one or more single-layer, unitary foam blocks made from a single unitary foam material. Lateral or longitudinal crosswise support can be provided and can be directly attached to the underside of the foam block or may be provided in a kit or separately sourced. The foundation may be used with a standard bed from or may include legs that can be attached to the crosswise supports along with optional braces that connect between the legs. The foam block is rigid enough to support a mattress and is compressible so it has a compressed configuration and an expanded configuration, and its bottom side may have channels for the supports. In the compressed configuration, the foundation may be folded and vacuum-sealed in a plastic membrane which provides benefits for storing, shipping, and delivering the foundation. When the foundation is delivered to its place of use, the compressed foundation is removed from its packaging, allowing the foam block to return to its expanded configuration.
In one aspect of the invention, the foam block includes crosswise supports with legs releasably attached to the bottom side of the crosswise supports. One set of legs is proximal to the head side of the foundation while another set is proximal to the foot side of the foundation. Further, additional sets of legs may be provided between the head and foot sets.
In another aspect of the invention with legs connected to the crosswise supports, braces are provided and connect between pairs of legs at opposing brace ends. Preferably, each brace intersects with another crosswise support and is connected thereto or rests there against at a mounting point and thereby provides additional support to the foam block between the legs.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, the foam block consists of single layer of foam material having an IFD between thirty-nine and ninety-five pounds, devoid of any elongated chambers or other cushioning layers. The foam block is subsequently covered and wrapped in an plastic layer and can be shipped in the interior of a shipping container alone or along with separable crosswise supports, legs and braces in the container.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings which are summarized below.
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
A foundation 10 for a mattress made up of a foam block 12 that is preferably a single layer of a unitary foam block that has an internally homogenous structure, i.e., without any internal elongated chamber, space, or other large void within the center portion of the foam block, and that preferably includes a plurality of rigid crosswise supports 14 at the bottom side of the foam block. The foam block is made of a compressible and flexible firm foam 72 having a density of 0.85-5.0 pounds per cubic foot and having an indentation force deflection (“IFD”) between thirty-nine and ninety-five (39-95 IFD) which has sufficient firmness and strength to support a mattress but is not rigid so that the foam block may still be compressed and is flexible enough to bend both laterally and longitudinally. The foam is preferably polyurethane or any other firm foam that both compressible and flexible. A lower range IFD of 30-39 would be possible for a lighter weight product but would likely have limited applications, such as for small children or infants.
The foam block has an expanded configuration 42 in which the foam block reaches its full thickness 44b and a compressed configuration 40 in which the foam block is pressed down to a reduced thickness 44a. The reduced thickness is less than half of the expanded thickness and is preferably between 15% and 25% of the expanded thickness. In the expanded configuration, the foam block supports a mattress and may be produced to the length and width dimensions that accommodate mattresses of various sizes. Typically, these dimensions will conform to traditional mattress and mattress foundation sizes, namely twin, full, queen, king, California king, etc. which typically have a length between seventy-four (74) and eighty (80) inches (74″-80″). However, traditional bedding sizes are not intended to be limiting, and the foundation size may vary in dimension relative to the mattress intended to be supported, including custom dimensions not traditionally used in the bedding industry.
Typically, foundations have a low profile thickness between five and eight inches (5″-8″) or a high profile thickness between nine and twelve inches (9″-12″) when expanded to their full thickness. When the foam block is compressed, the reduced thickness is approximately between two and three inches (2″-3″). It will be appreciated that the reduced thickness is primarily dependent on the full thickness of the foam block, but the IFD of the foam could also play a factor in the amount to which the foam can be compressed, particularly depending on the equipment that is used to compress the foam. The compression of the foam block is primarily unidirectional so that the compressed configuration and the expanded configuration have nearly the same lateral width 36 between the pair of foundation sides 34 and longitudinal foundation length 38 between the head side 30 and the foot side 32. The foam's IFD is measured using an industry standard technique, such as ASTM D3574 entitled “Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams” and published by ASTM International, and the measurement technique for the foam's IFD does not form a part of the present invention.
Another aspect of the foam foundation are the crosswise supports connected to the foam block's bottom side 28. These crosswise rigid supports 14 act as a skeletal structure and provide rigid structure to the foam foundation 10, but the supports are thin enough (less than 2″ or 3″) to allow the foundation to be compressed to its reduced thickness, and there is no rigid connection between the crosswise supports so that the flexible foam block can be rolled with the rigid supports into the preferred shipping arrangement. Preferably, the crosswise supports in a unitary foam block are only connected to each other through their attachment to the unitary foam block and not through any other structure. The crosswise supports preferably extend laterally across the foam block so that the foam block rolls in the longitudinal direction around the foam block's lateral axis which results in the most compact configuration of the compressed and rolled foam foundation. As described in detail below with regard to
The crosswise rigid supports may be any number of shapes including but not limited to beams, slats, rods, and planar panels. Additionally, the crosswise supports may be made from any number of rigid materials including but not limited to woods, plastics, metals, hardened foams, composites, and other similar materials. The crosswise supports preferably traverse the entire width of the foundation and are substantially perpendicular to the side edges while remaining substantially parallel to one another. The crosswise supports extend between the sides of the foundation so that they can be placed onto a standard bed frame and provide even support across the span of the bed frame. Preferably, the crosswise supports are connected to the foam block during manufacture prior to shipping, but the foam foundation and crosswise supports can alternatively be shipped together in an unattached arrangement. In another alternative arrangement, foam foundation can be shipped on its own, and a user may provide their own crosswise supports for connection to the foam foundation.
It is generally an aspect of the foam foundation to have crosswise supports spaced apart from each other by a distance 46. The crosswise supports provide crosswise rigidity to the foundation and are flexibly connected to each other through contiguous portions of the single flexible foam block that extend between adjacent crosswise supports; they are not rigidly connected. The spaced distance 46 will vary based on the number of crosswise supports included in the foundation and its size and the shape of the crosswise supports. In spacing the crosswise supports from each other, the distance separating the supports has a range that is greater than the reduced thickness 44a of the foam block 12, preferably greater than the foam block's full thickness 44b, and less than the foam block's lateral width 36. Increasing the distance reduces the number of crosswise supports which reduces the cost of the foundation and the weight of the foundation. The maximum distance depends on the expanded foam block's strength and firmness and preferably prevents the foam block from sagging between the rigid crosswise supports. The minimum distance depends on the flexibility of the foam, particularly in the compressed configuration and preferably allows the foam block's compressed configuration to be folded. The distance between the crosswise supports should not be increased so much that it results in sagging which could negatively impact the uniform, firm support that is provided to the mattress above the foundation. The distance between the crosswise supports can vary to avoid sagging at the ends of the foundation, such as with the crosswise supports adjacent to the head side and foot side of the foam block being spaced closer to the ends. Preferably, the distance between adjacent crosswise supports in the center section of the foundation is approximately 14.5″ and can be as far as 20″.
As shown in
According to the embodiment shown in
In another aspect of the present invention, a cover 18 envelops the foam block 12 as shown in
Prior to compressing the foam block as shown in
The crosswise supports maintain the rigidity of the foam foundation in the direction of the supports' axes so that the foundation can only fold around the supports' crosswise axes. Depending on the number of crosswise supports and the flexibility of the foam, the number of overlapping sections in the folds can vary. Generally, the packaged foundation assembly in its compact form has a folded height and a folded width that fit within boxes with the longest dimension being slightly larger than the width of the foam block between its sides and the other dimensions being less than half of this longest dimension. As shown in
In the embodiments shown in
When the foundation shown in
The segmented foam foundation 86 embodiment shown in
In another aspect of the segmented foam foundation, the crosswise supports may cover the entire surface area of the corresponding foam sections and approximately abut one another in the opened arrangement. The adjacent crosswise supports may have a spacing greater than the reduced thickness of the foam block which helps in the rolling or folding of the foam block. However, with hinges in the cover at the interface between foam sections and alternating between the bottom side and the top side, no spacing or other gap between the crosswise supports is required in the segmented foam foundation embodiments other than whatever space is required for the cover that connects the adjacent foam sections.
The present invention also provides for an inventive method for preparing a foam block for a mattress foundation as shown in
Generally, the above method describes how the foam foundation goes from the factory to the user with easier shipping, storage, and delivery in the compact form compared to the large and rigid prior art foundations. The vacuum-sealed plastic membrane, packing material, and shipping container are used to facilitate the shipping, storage, and delivery of the foam foundation. The compression of the foam may occur through any number of means, but pressure is preferably applied to the foundation while in the plastic membrane until the foam block reaches the desired compressed configuration. Once this compressed configuration is achieved, the plastic membrane is vacuum sealed and the pressure is removed.
The compressed vacuum-sealed foundation is folded or rolled into its folded arrangement described above which may include the crosswise supports for a packaged foundation assembly, and the vacuum-sealed plastic membrane helps maintain the foam block in its compressed configuration. The packaging material surrounding the folded, compressed vacuum-sealed foundation and the shipping container also help to maintain this configuration for storage, shipment, and delivery. The compact size of the folded, compressed vacuum-sealed foundation is a significant improvement over known mattress foundations that cannot be compressed and folded to such a compact state. Additionally, the compact foundation can be inserted into a shipping container for storage, shipment, and delivery.
The use of a single-layer, internally-homogeneous, unitary foam block to produce the foundation is beneficial over multiple layers of foam that would cost more to manufacture and assemble. Multiple layer foam structures are typically used for foam mattresses where it is more important to support a person lying on the topside of the mattress while avoiding pressure points for the person or for providing extra support in particular areas, such as along the sides of the mattress, such as disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,662,393, 6,901,722, and 9,259,099. Additionally, the absence of any internal elongated chamber, space, or other large void in the internally-homogeneous foam block is also beneficial for the foundation. Elongated chambers or other spaces or large voids within a foam mattress can be used for inserts allowing for a different firmness than the foam block or may have a bladder that can be filled with a fluid, such as disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,061,856 and 9,655,456 (US Pat. App. Pub. No. 2015/0015402 by Boyd). In the particular instance of the '456 Patent which discloses a polyurethane foam body having a firmness IFD between eight and seventy pounds (8-70 pounds IFD), the voids with the fluid-filled bladders would be critical when using the firmer foams with an IFD above thirty-five (35) pounds for the mattress because such a firmer foam that is unitary and internally-homogeneous, i.e., without the voids and fluid-filled bladders, would not be suitable for use as a mattress due to the hardness of the material. However, different layers of foam and variations in firmness are not necessary or even desirable for a foundation which primarily functions to provide firm and even support to the underside of a mattress that is away from the person who is lying on the topside of the mattress. The uniform, firm support provided by the foundation to the underside of the mattress could be negatively impacted by using multiple layers of foam or by having chambers allowing for variations in the firmness, and the increased cost for the foundation would make it less desirable. Applicant also notes that it would necessarily change the principle of operation of foam mattresses with multiple layers or internal chambers and would render them less suitable for their intended purposes if these mattresses were to be changed to a single layer of foam and the internal chambers were not provided.
The use of crosswise supports at the bottom side of the foam foundation combined with the higher IFD of the foam used for the foundation provides sufficient rigidity to avoid sagging between adjacent crosswise supports that could negatively impact the uniformity of the support provided to the underside of the mattress. In German utility model application DE 20 2011 052 257 U1 by Lueck GmbH, a foam mattress has crosswise supports that are fit in channels in the foam block and are connected by flexible connectors, such as textile belts or straps. These straps would provide some additional support between the crosswise supports that may help prevent sagging of the mattress, but they also add complexity to the manufacture of the structure which will result in additional costs for production and the materials and will increase the weight of the mattress. The illustrations in the Lueck reference also show a dozen crosswise supports used in a closely-spaced arrangement, and applicant notes that twelve (12) crosswise supports for a standard length mattress would result in a spacing of approximately six and one half inches (6.5″) between the centerlines of the crosswise supports, less than seven inches (7) when the two (2) end crosswise supports are positioned slightly inwardly from the head side and foot side of the mattress. Based on the illustration, the crosswise supports that have widths slightly smaller than the foam sections between the supports so it is apparent that the width of each crosswise support is approximately 3″ and the distance between the crosswise supports is less than four inches (4″). Due to the lower IFD of the mattress foam in Lueck, it can be appreciated that the crosswise supports for the mattress are clearly more closely spaced than the expanded thickness of the foam mattress. In comparison, in the embodiments of the present invention for the foam foundation with crosswise supports situated in channels in the foam block, the crosswise supports are widely spaced with the distance between the crosswise supports being greater than the expanded thickness of the foam foundation.
The foundation is preferably produced using a single-layer of foam as explained above, and it will be appreciated that the foundation layer with the crosswise supports at the bottom side could be combined with one or more additional layers of foam attached to the top side of the foundation layer. Such an additional layer could have an IFD in a range that is more suitable for a mattress (i.e., between 8-20 pounds for memory foam blocks and between 15-35 pounds for latex foam blocks). In comparison to the mattress layer(s), the IFD for the foundation foam block is typically above 39 pounds as indicated above. Memory foam is not typically used for foundation foams because it is not necessary for the uniform, firm support of a mattress.
Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the foundation having a flexible foam material consisting of a unitary single layer with an internally-homogenous structure, devoid of any elongated chamber or a cushion layer not only provides a less complicated manufacturing process with a single material but also provides am improved foundation without any cushioning layer that has an IFD less than thirty-nine (39) pounds which would negatively impact the ability of the foundation to provide support to a separate mattress. Other prior art references, such as the Boyd '402 Application, teach composite foam mattresses have more complicated structures that include one or more layers of higher IFD foams which provide structural support and that also include lower IFD cushioning layers which provide comfort to the sleeper. Composite mattresses are not capable of functioning satisfactorily as a foundation for a separate mattress structure because they cannot provide the firm structural support that is required of the foundation by the separate mattress. Additionally, the cushioning side of the mattress cannot be flipped because it is permanently attached at its lower layer to the top of the firmer foam. By nature, the lower IFD cushioning layers are not as firm as the foundation IFD, and any inclusion of cushioning layers reduces the effectiveness of the overall structure to function as a foundation. It will also be appreciated that when the cushioning side of the composite mattress is no longer performing satisfactorily, the entire composite mattress would need to be replace even if the firmer side continues to provide satisfactory structural support; in comparison, with the separate foundation structure of the present invention, a mattress can be can be replaced and/or flipped.
Even in alternative embodiments of the foundation described herein that include a scrim material or other fabric attached to the foam block by an adhesive layer between the fabric and the foam block, the foundation remains devoid of any cushioning layer. Thus, the foam block consists of only the flexible foam material having no cushion layer between the top side of the foam block and the cover. Any additional layer that is between the foam block and the cover, such as the scrim layer, is a flexible fabric material with a thickness that is less than the thickness of the cover. Accordingly, it will be understood by those having an ordinary skill in the art that such a thin layer of flexible material is neither a supporting foam nor a cushioning layer so it is not measured by IFD and instead serves an entirely separate function which may include but is not limited to fire retardation, moisture-resistance, and/or bed bug protection.
In the embodiments of the foundation shown in
As explained in detail with regard to the lateral crosswise supports discussed above, there are no rigid connections between the longitudinal crosswise supports so that the flexible foam block can be rolled even when the rigid supports are connected to the foam block and the unit can be stowed into a shipping arrangement as the foundation rolls in the lateral direction around the axes of the longitudinal supports 90. Once rolled the foundation will be in a folded arrangement with one side section along one side edge and another side section along the opposite side edge of the foundation overlapping a longitudinal center section of the foundation. Depending on the number of longitudinal crosswise supports and the flexibility of the foam, additional overlapping sections may be used between the folds.
The longitudinal crosswise supports extend between the head side and the foot side of the foundation and therefore allow the foundation to be used with bed frames 200 that may not necessarily have a width that is approximately equal to the lateral width of the foundation. Persons having an ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that bed frames that have varying lateral widths present problems when lateral crosswise supports are used. For example, if the lateral width of the bed frame (WBF) is greater than the lateral width of the foundation (WF), lateral crosswise supports will not span the gap between the opposite sides of the bed frame and therefore will be unable to provide additional support to the foundation and mattress. Further, sides of a bed frame may angle away from one another from head side to foot side, or vice versa, allowing the lateral supports to properly span the gap between one end of the frame but be unable to span the gap on the opposite end. With the varying lateral widths of the bed frame, the lateral crosswise supports could be rendered less effective than is desired for the foundation.
Longitudinal crosswise supports combat the issue of varying frame widths as these longitudinal supports intersect and contact the lateral crossbars of the bed frame that connect the opposing sides and provide support even when the bed frame is not specifically sized for the foundation or if it is not perfectly square. As shown in
Alternatively, although the
The longitudinal crosswise supports also provide added support to the foundation and mattress where they operate in concert with the lateral crossbars of the frame. The crossbars not only connect the opposing sides of the frame but also provide support to foundation as explained above. The longitudinal crosswise supports therefore supplement the lateral support provided by the crossbars by further supporting the foundation, mattress and weight thereon in the spaces between the lateral crossbars. Thus, the foundation, mattress and weight thereon are supported laterally by the frame cross bars and longitudinally by the longitudinal crosswise supports.
In another embodiment particularly shown
When braces 94 are provided between sets of legs, additional structural support is provided without necessarily using a separate frame structure. In operation, the rigid braces connect between a pair of legs beneath the foam block at opposing brace ends 96a and 96b and preferably includes a longitudinal brace dimension (LBD) between the opposing ends that is greater than one-half the lateral width of the foam block. To provide further structural support, it is also preferred that each brace intersect and contact at least one of the crosswise supports at a mounting point 98 and may connect thereto with a fastener 98a or may simply rest against the crosswise support 98b and support the same. It will also be appreciated that braces could connect between pairs of legs without intersecting a crosswise support or could be situated underneath the crosswise supports.
In operation, the legs connect to the underside of the crosswise supports with fasteners that allow the legs to be securely connected thereto in an assembled arrangement and released for shipping or storage. Accordingly, the legs can be separated from the foam block and shipped within the interior space of the shipping container along with the packaged foundation in the folded arrangement and crosswise supports as described in detail above. Similarly, braces are releasably connected to respective legs with fasteners and can be disassembled for shipping or storage within the shipping container. Further still, additional fasteners can be used to physically connect the braces to the crosswise supports at the mounting points between the opposing brace ends if a sturdier configuration is desired than when the crosswise supports simply rest on the mounting points as described above. Thus, foundations which use braces in combination with the legs are more similar to the support structure and frames that are used in furniture with legs, such as couches, but do not require a separate skeletal structure that is not included in the shipping container containing the foundation.
Although the particular fastener type 100 is not intended to be limiting and persons having an ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that numerous fasteners may be combined with the teachings of the present invention to releasably attach the legs and braces together and to the crosswise supports, the preferred fasteners include a threaded post and bracket. As shown in Detail-A of
Further still, the foundation with legs described herein and shown in
In the preferred embodiment depicted in
The embodiments of the foam foundation were chosen and described to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to persons who are skilled in the art. As various modifications could be made to the exemplary embodiments, as described above, without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative rather than limiting. Additionally, for bed frames that already have crosswise supports or have a platform or a web across the frame, the compact configuration of the foam in a cover could be packaged with instructions 300 in place of the crosswise supports that explain the seating of the foundation on spaced crosswise supports or other frame options to properly support the mattress. The crosswise supports provide crosswise rigidity, but they are not rigidly connected to each other and are only connected to each other through the foam material, or the foam and cover for the segmented foam foundation. The present invention has additional advantages over traditional mattress foundations. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/176,132 filed on Feb. 15, 2021 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Pat. App. Nos. 62/977,053 and 62/988,935 respectively filed on Feb. 14, 2020 and Mar. 13, 2020, and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/664,840 filed on Oct. 26, 2019 which is a continuation-in-part of International App. No. PCT/US18/29412 filed on Apr. 25, 2018, designating the United States and claiming priority to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 15/499,077 and 15/694,057 filed on Apr. 27, 2017 and Sep. 1, 2017 and issued on Sep. 12, 2017 and Jan. 1, 2019 as U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,756,951 and 10,165,865, respectively, the former claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 62/415,534 filed on Nov. 1, 2016, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2551976 | Smith | May 1951 | A |
2878494 | Healy | Mar 1959 | A |
3146469 | Slade | Sep 1964 | A |
3724009 | Ambrose | Apr 1973 | A |
3837020 | Bosch | Sep 1974 | A |
3842451 | McCormick | Oct 1974 | A |
3846857 | Weinstock | Nov 1974 | A |
3848283 | Ikeda | Nov 1974 | A |
3913154 | Sweeney | Oct 1975 | A |
3973281 | Davis | Aug 1976 | A |
4106139 | Southard | Aug 1978 | A |
4229847 | Degen | Oct 1980 | A |
4316298 | Russo | Feb 1982 | A |
4535494 | Diamonstein | Aug 1985 | A |
4692199 | Kozlowski | Sep 1987 | A |
4711067 | Magni | Dec 1987 | A |
4795517 | Elliott | Jan 1989 | A |
4928337 | Chauncey | May 1990 | A |
4975135 | Lowe | Dec 1990 | A |
5231717 | Scott | Aug 1993 | A |
5504952 | Ovadia | Apr 1996 | A |
5513402 | Schwartz | May 1996 | A |
5671492 | Simon | Sep 1997 | A |
5681090 | St. Thomas | Oct 1997 | A |
5745940 | Roberts | May 1998 | A |
5960496 | Boyd | Oct 1999 | A |
6085373 | Montana | Jul 2000 | A |
6115861 | Reeder | Sep 2000 | A |
6662393 | Boyd | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6739008 | Kindrick | May 2004 | B1 |
7140053 | Mangano | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7200884 | Wright | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7334280 | Swartzburg | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7469437 | Mikkelsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7631381 | Flippin | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8025964 | Landvik | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8443974 | Oh | May 2013 | B2 |
8800082 | Kluft | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8935819 | Hartley | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9179782 | Schiller | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9655456 | Boyd | May 2017 | B2 |
10165865 | Stewart, Jr. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10548789 | Dyevich | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20040055086 | Owens, Jr. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040074007 | Gladney | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139552 | Walters, Jr. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040163178 | Corneil | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050000026 | Gladney | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028274 | Hooper | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050028275 | Hooper | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060123551 | Hsia | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070151033 | Wyatt | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080172799 | Constantinescu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080235868 | Snitzer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090025150 | Smalling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090183311 | Nguyen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20130145555 | Hargreaves | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130269107 | Fiene | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140304921 | Collins | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150015402 | Boyd | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160088951 | McGuinness | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160157625 | Schneider | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160198862 | Farley | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170049242 | Franken | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170079444 | Blazar | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180027977 | Shelby | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180049558 | Jurcenko | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180092466 | Harrow | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180116421 | Goncalves | May 2018 | A1 |
20190150631 | Pearce | May 2019 | A1 |
20190343294 | DeMoss | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200000243 | Andrew | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200054147 | Stewart, Jr. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200196771 | Martin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20210076835 | Pearce | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210120967 | Murphy | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210251391 | Wagner | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20220031085 | Sheikh | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220369827 | Rose | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62988935 | Mar 2020 | US | |
62977053 | Feb 2020 | US | |
62415534 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15499077 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 15694057 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17176132 | Feb 2021 | US |
Child | 17322381 | US | |
Parent | 16664840 | Oct 2019 | US |
Child | 17322381 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2018/029412 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Child | 17176132 | US | |
Parent | 15694057 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | PCT/US2018/029412 | US | |
Parent | 15499077 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | PCT/US2018/029412 | WO |