This patent application pertains to apparatus and processes for compression of spaced sources for hearing assistance devices.
Hearing assistance devices, such as hearing aids, include electronic instruments worn in or around the ear that compensate for hearing losses by amplifying and processing sound. The electronic circuitry of the device is contained within a housing that is commonly either placed in the external ear canal and/or behind the ear. Transducers for converting sound to an electrical signal and vice-versa may be integrated into the housing or external to it.
Whether due to a conduction deficit or sensorineural damage, hearing loss in most patients occurs non-uniformly over the audio frequency range, most commonly at high frequencies. Hearing aids may be designed to compensate for such hearing deficits by amplifying received sound in a frequency-specific manner, thus acting as a kind of acoustic equalizer that compensates for the abnormal frequency response of the impaired ear. Adjusting a hearing aid's frequency specific amplification characteristics to achieve a desired level of compensation for an individual patient is referred to as fitting the hearing aid. One common way of fitting a hearing aid is to measure hearing loss, apply a fitting algorithm, and fine-tune the hearing aid parameters.
Hearing assistance devices also use a dynamic range adjustment, called dynamic range compression, which controls the level of sound sent to the ear of the patient to normalize the loudness of sound in specific frequency regions. The gain that is provided at a given frequency is controlled by the level of sound in that frequency region (the amount of frequency specificity is determined by the filters in the multiband compression design). When properly used, compression adjusts the level of a sound at a given frequency such that its loudness is similar to that for a normal hearing person without a hearing aid. There are other fitting philosophies, but they all prescribe a certain gain for a certain input level at each frequency. It is well known that the application of the prescribed gain for a given input level is affected by time constants of the compressor. What is less well understood is that the prescription can break down when there are two or more simultaneous sounds in the same frequency region. The two sounds may be at two different levels, and therefore each should receive different gain for each to be perceived at their own necessary loudness. Because only one gain value can be prescribed by the hearing aid, however, at most one sound can receive the appropriate gain, providing the second sound with the less than desired sound level and resulting loudness.
This phenomenon is illustrated in the following figures.
This could be particularly problematic with music and other acoustic sound mixes such as the soundtrack to a Dolby 5.1 movie, where signals of significantly different levels are mixed together with the goal of provided a specific aural experience. If the mix is sent to a compressor and improper gains are applied to the different sounds, then the auditory experience is negatively affected and is not the experience intended by the produce of the sound. In the case of music, the gain for each musical instrument is not correct, and the gain to one instrument might be quite different than it would be if the instrument were played in isolation. The impact is three-fold: the loudness of that instrument is not normal for the hearing aid listener (it may be too soft, for example), distortion to the temporal envelope of that instrument can occur, and interaural-level difference (ILD) cues for sound source localization and segregation can be distorted, making the perceived auditory image of that instrument fluctuate in a way that was not in the original recording.
Another example is when the accompanying instrumental tracks in a movie soundtrack have substantial energy then compression can overly reduce the overall level and distort the ILD of the simultaneous vocal tracks, diminishing the ability of the wearer to enjoy the mix of instrumental and vocal sound and even to hear and understand the vocal track. Thus, there is a need in the art for improved compression and mixing systems for hearing assistance devices.
This application relates to a system for compression for hearing assistance devices by application of compression to individual sound sources before applying a head-related transfer function (HRTF) to prevent compression and cross modulation of ILD cues for localization, according to one example. Variations of the present system use coordinated compression to left and right individual source signals after application of HRTFs. This Summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and is not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details about the present subject matter are found in the detailed description and the appended claims. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The following detailed description of the present invention refers to subject matter in the accompanying drawings which show, by way of illustration, specific aspects and embodiments in which the present subject matter may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. References to “an”, “one”, or “various” embodiments in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references contemplate more than one embodiment. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of legal equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
One advantage of the system of
Independent dynamic-range compression of stereo signals diminishes ILD cues for localization. Particularly in complex situations with multiple sources, preserving ILD cues is beneficial. The present subject matter preserves source-specific ILD cues by preventing compression and cross modulation of the ILDs, while providing optimal gain for each individual source.
An alternate embodiment is shown in
L=A+S
R=B+S
Then, one can remove the singer from the instruments by subtracting the left from the right channels, and create a signal that is dominated by the singer by adding the left and right channels:
L−R=(A+S)−(B+S)=A−B
L+R=(A+S)+(B+S)=A+B+2*S
CS=(L+R)/2=S+(A+B)/2
Thus, one can compress the (L+R)/2 mix to the compressor so that the gain is primarily that for the singer. To get a signal that is primarily instrument A and one that is primarily instrument B:
CA=L−R/2=(A+S)−(B+S)/2=A−(B−S)/2
CB=R−L/2=(B+S)−(A+S)/2=B−(A−S)/2
After CS, CL and CR have been individually compressed, they are mixed together to create a stereo channel again:
CL=2*(CS+CA)/3
CR=2*(CS+CB)/3
Left stereo signal 801 and right stereo signal 802 are sent through a process 803 that separates individual sound sources. Each source is sent to a compressor 804 and then mixed with mixer 806 to provide left 807 and right 808 stereo signals according to one embodiment of the present subject matter.
It is understood that the present subject matter can be embodied in a number of different applications. In applications involving mixing of music to generate hearing assistance device-compatible stereo signals, the mixing can be performed in a computer programmed to mix the tracks and perform compression as set forth herein. In various embodiments, the mixing is done in a fitting system. Such fitting systems include, but are not limited to, the fitting systems set forth in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/935,935, filed Nov. 6, 2007, and entitled: SIMULATED SURROUND SOUND HEARING AID FITTING SYSTEM, the entire specification of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In various embodiments, the mixing is done using the processor of the hearing assistance device. In cases where such devices are hearing aids, that processing can be done by the digital signal processor of the hearing aid or by another set of logic programmed to perform the mixing function provided herein. Other applications and processes are possible without departing from the scope of the present subject matter.
It is understood that in various embodiments, the apparatus and processes set forth herein may be embodied in digital hardware, analog hardware, and/or combinations thereof. It is also understood that in various embodiments, the apparatus and processes set forth herein may be embodied in hardware, software, firmware, and/or combinations thereof.
This application is intended to cover adaptations and variations of the present subject matter. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the present subject matter should be determined with reference to the appended claim, along with the full scope of legal equivalents to which the claims are entitled.
The present application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of and claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/474,881, filed May 29, 2009, and titled COMPRESSION AND MIXING FOR HEARING ASSISTANCE DEVICES, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/058,101, filed on Jun. 2, 2008, the benefit of priority of each of which is claimed hereby, and each of which are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4406001 | Klasco et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4996712 | Laurence et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5785661 | Shennib | Jul 1998 | A |
5825894 | Shennib | Oct 1998 | A |
6405163 | Laroche | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424721 | Hohn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7280664 | Fosgate et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7330556 | Kates | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340062 | Revit et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7409068 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8521530 | Every et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8705751 | Edwards | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9031242 | Edwards et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
20010040969 | Revit et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020078817 | Date | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030169891 | Ryan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040190734 | Kates | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050135643 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060034361 | Choi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050909 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083394 | McGrath | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070076902 | Master | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070297626 | Revit et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080044048 | Pentland | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080205664 | Kim et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090043591 | Breebaart | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090116657 | Edwards et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090296944 | Edwards | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040135 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100211388 | Yu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110046948 | Pedersen | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110286618 | Vandali et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130051565 | Pontoppidan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130108096 | Fitz | May 2013 | A1 |
20130163784 | Tracey et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130182875 | Cederberg et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140226825 | Edwards | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150092967 | Fitz et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102006047983 | Apr 2008 | DE |
102006047986 | Apr 2008 | DE |
1531650 | May 2005 | EP |
1655998 | May 2006 | EP |
1796427 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1895515 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2131610 | Dec 2009 | EP |
1236377 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2191466 | May 2013 | EP |
WO-0124577 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0176321 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-2007041231 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007096808 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007106553 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2009035614 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2011100802 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Aphex Systems”, Wikipedia, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet [Archived Nov. 28, 2011]: <URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aphex—Systems&direction=prev&oldid=490050016>, (Accessed Dec. 30, 2011), 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935 , Response filed Jun. 5, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2012”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Apr. 12, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2013”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Response filed Nov. 5, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 4, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Response filed Jun. 13, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Response filed Dec. 20, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Communication of Notice of Opposition mailed May 23, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Letter from the Opponent mailed Sep. 16, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Response filed Jan. 6, 2012 to Notice of Opposition mailed Jun. 21, 2011”, 14 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Response filed Sep. 16, 2013 to Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed Mar. 7, 2013”, 48 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed Mar. 7, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
Hu, Yi, et al., “A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms”, J Acoust Soc Am., 122(3), (2007), 1777-1786. |
Hu, Yi, et al., “Techniques for estimating the ideal binary mask”, Proc. of 11th International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.iwaenc.org/proceedings/2008/contents/papers/9029.pdf>, (2008), 4 pgs. |
Larsen, Erik, et al., “Perceiving Low Pitch through Small Loudspeakers”, Presented at the AES 108th Convention, (Feb. 2000), 1-21. |
Loizou, P C, et al., “Reasons why Current Speech-Enhancement Algorithms do not Improve Speech Intelligibility and Suggested Solutions”, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 19, No. 1, (Jan. 2011), 47-56. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Advisory Action mailed May 14, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Jul. 21, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Pre-Appeal Brief filed Jun. 2, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Response filed May 2, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9, Response filed May 14, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Reply to Appeal filed Aug. 11, 2014”, 69 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13198739.8, Extended European Search Report mailed Mar. 27, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
Bochler, M, et al., “Sound classification in hearing aids inspired by auditory scene”, Eurasip Journal of Applied Signal, Processing, Hindawi Publishing Co., Cuyahoga Falls, OH, US, vol. 2005, No. 18, (Oct. 15, 2005), 2991-3002. |
Robjohns, Hugh, “How & When to Use Mixed Compression”, Sound on Sound, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Jun99/articles/mIxcomp.htm>, (Jun. 1999), 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2014”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Response filed Nov. 18, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 15, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9, Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Communication of Further Notices of Opposition mailed Jun. 27, 2011”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Decision Rejecting the Opposition mailed Nov. 21, 2013”, 22 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Letter Regarding the Opposition filed Jun. 26, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Advisory Action mailed May 23, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Final Office Action Mailed Jan. 31, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Response filed Apr. 30, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Response filed May 31, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2012 and Advisory Action mailed May 23, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Response filed Oct. 27, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Non Final Office Action Mailed Jan. 13, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Response filed Dec. 30, 2011 to Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 30, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,881, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 30, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9, Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2010”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9, Office Action Response Filed Sep. 22, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9, Office Action Response filed Nov. 16, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9, Search Report mailed Aug. 11, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08253607.9; Office Action mailed May 9, 2011”, 9 Pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Communication of a Notice of Opposition mailed May 23, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, European Search Report mailed Jul. 29, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 5, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09161628.4, Response filed Feb. 11, 2010 to European Search Report mailed Aug. 5, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
Stone, Michael A., et al., “Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.”, J Acoust Soc Am., 123(2), (Feb. 2008), 1063-76. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Appeal Brief filed Aug. 21, 2014”, 25 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Corrected Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 5, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 26, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,443, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,443, Response filed Nov. 21, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 29, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,443, Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 29, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/255,753, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 26, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13178787.1, Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 5, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13198739.8, Response filed May 1, 2015 to Extended European Search Report mailed Mar. 27, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14186975.0, Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 30, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
Hu, Yi, “A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY, US, vol. 127, No. 5, (May 1, 2010), 3145-3153. |
Sinex, Donal G, “Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: Dependence on frequency and threshold parameters”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY, US, vol. 133, No. 4, (Apr. 1, 2013). |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,935, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed Apr. 8, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,320, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 11, 2015”, 13 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130148813 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61058101 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12474881 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 13568618 | US |