This invention relates to fibrous nonwoven webs suitable for use as a topsheet in a disposable absorbent article. In particular, this invention relates to fibrous webs treated by mechanical formation to have increased compression resistance.
Disposable absorbent articles such as baby diapers, adult incontinence products, sanitary napkins, pantiliners, hemorrhoid treatment pads, bandages, and the like are well known in the art. Such articles generally have a fluid permeable topsheet, and fluid impermeable backsheet, and an absorbent core sandwiched between the topsheet and the backsheet to absorb and contain body fluid exudates.
In some applications of disposable absorbent articles, such as sanitary napkins and pantiliners, it is desirable to not only absorb body fluids, but to minimize fluid on the body of the wearer. Fluid on the body can be minimized by ensuring that the fluid enters the absorbent article, and does not come back out, such as by being pressed or squeezed out. While much work has been done in to minimize rewet to the body, there remains a need for a disposable absorbent article that helps keep the users body clean and dry.
Accordingly, there is a disposable absorbent article that helps provide for a clean body benefit in the area of sanitary napkins and pantiliners.
Additionally, there is a need for a method for relatively inexpensively making a disposable absorbent article that helps provide for a clean body benefit in the area of sanitary napkins and pantiliners.
A sanitary napkin comprising a topsheet comprising a plurality of discrete tufts of fibrous material, wherein the topsheet has a density of less than 0.027 g/cc under a load of 0.004 psi, and a density of less than 0.068 at a load of 0.23 psi.
The present invention can be utilized in any of known disposable absorbent products. In a preferred embodiment, however, the present invention comprises a sanitary napkin intended to be used as a menstrual pad. The sanitary napkin of the present invention comprises at least three components: a topsheet, a lotion applied to the topsheet, and an absorbent core in fluid communication with the topsheet. It has been unexpectedly found that, by using the web of the present invention, a sanitary napkin of the present invention can provide for a desirable clean body benefit. Specifically, the sanitary napkin of the present invention provides for better compression resistance, comparable to that of known formed film webs, such as DRI-WEAVE® topsheet utilized on ALWAYS® sanitary napkins marketed by The Procter & Gamble Co. Improved compression resistance improves the rewet properties of the sanitary napkin, such that less absorbed fluid is squeezed back out of the product onto the body of the wearer.
Conversion factors for units used herein: 1 inch=25.4 mm; 1 psi=6.89 kPa; 1 foot=304.8 mm.
Web 1 has a first side 3 and a second side 5, the term “sides” being used in the common usage of generally planar two-dimensional webs, such as paper and films that have two sides when in a generally flat condition. Each precursor web 20 and 21 has a first surface 12 and 13, respectively, and a second surface 14 and 15, respectively (shown in
In one embodiment, first side 3 of web 1 is defined by exposed portions of the first surface 13 of second precursor web 21 and at least one, but preferably a plurality of, discrete tufts 6 which are integral extensions of the fibers of at least first precursor web 20 and preferably both precursor webs. As shown in
As used herein, the term “nonwoven web” refers to a web having a structure of individual fibers or threads which are interlaid, but not in a repeating pattern as in a woven or knitted fabric, which do not typically have randomly oriented fibers. Nonwoven webs or fabrics have been formed from many processes, such as, for example, meltblowing processes, spunbonding processes, hydroentangling, airlaying, and bonded carded web processes, including carded thermal bonding. Fibers can be bicomponent, multicomponent, multiconstituent, and the like, as known in the art. The basis weight of nonwoven fabrics is usually expressed in grams per square meter (gsm). The basis weight of the laminate web is the combined basis weight of the constituent layers and any other added components. Fiber diameters are usually expressed in microns; fiber size can also be expressed in denier, which is a unit of weight per length of fiber. The basis weight of laminate webs suitable for use in the present invention can range from 10 gsm to 500 gsm.
The constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor web 20 or 21 can be comprised of polymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, and blends thereof. The fibers can comprise cellulose, rayon, cotton, or other natural materials or blends of polymer and natural materials. The fibers can also comprise a super absorbent material such as polyacrylate or any combination of suitable materials. The fibers can be monocomponent, bicomponent, and/or biconstituent, non-round (e.g., capillary channel fibers), and can have major cross-sectional dimensions (e.g., diameter for round fibers) ranging from 0.1-500 microns. For example, one type of fibers suitable for the nonwoven web includes nanofibers. Nanofibers are described as fibers having a mean diameter of less than 1 micron. Nanofibers can comprise all of the fibers in a nonwoven web or a portion of the fibers in a nonwoven web. The constituent fibers of the nonwoven precursor web may also be a mixture of different fiber types, differing in such features as chemistry (e.g. PE and PP), components (mono- and bi-), denier (micro denier and >20 denier), shape (i.e. capillary and round) and the like. The constituent fibers can range from about 0.1 denier to about 100 denier.
As used herein, “spunbond fibers” refers to small diameter fibers which are formed by extruding molten thermoplastic material as filaments from a plurality of fine, usually circular capillaries of a spinneret with the diameter of the extruded filaments then being rapidly reduced. Spunbond fibers are generally not tacky when they are deposited on a collecting surface. Spunbond fibers are generally continuous and have average diameters (from a sample of at least 10) larger than 7 microns, and more particularly, between about 10 and 40 microns.
As used herein, the term “meltblowing” refers to a process in which fibers are formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, die capillaries as molten threads or filaments into converging high velocity, usually heated, gas (for example air) streams which attenuate the filaments of molten thermoplastic material to reduce their diameter, which may be to microfiber diameter. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface, often while still tacky, to form a web of randomly dispersed meltblown fibers. Meltblown fibers are microfibers which may be continuous or discontinuous and are generally smaller than 10 microns in average diameter.
As used herein, the term “polymer” generally includes, but is not limited to, homopolymers, copolymers, such as for example, block, graft, random and alternating copolymers, terpolymers, etc., and blends and modifications thereof. In addition, unless otherwise specifically limited, the term “polymer” includes all possible geometric configurations of the material. The configurations include, but are not limited to, isotactic, atactic, syndiotactic, and random symmetries.
As used herein, the term “monocomponent” fiber refers to a fiber formed from one or more extruders using only one polymer. This is not meant to exclude fibers formed from one polymer to which small amounts of additives have been added for coloration, antistatic properties, lubrication, hydrophilicity, etc. These additives, for example titanium dioxide for coloration, are generally present in an amount less than about 5 weight percent and more typically about 2 weight percent.
As used herein, the term “bicomponent fibers” refers to fibers which have been formed from at least two different polymers extruded from separate extruders but spun together to form one fiber. Bicomponent fibers are also sometimes referred to as conjugate fibers or multicomponent fibers. The polymers are arranged in substantially constantly positioned distinct zones across the cross-section of the bicomponent fibers and extend continuously along the length of the bicomponent fibers. The configuration of such a bicomponent fiber may be, for example, a sheath/core arrangement wherein one polymer is surrounded by another, or may be a side-by-side arrangement, a pie arrangement, or an “islands-in-the-sea” arrangement.
As used herein, the term “biconstituent fibers” refers to fibers which have been formed from at least two polymers extruded from the same extruder as a blend. Biconstituent fibers do not have the various polymer components arranged in relatively constantly positioned distinct zones across the cross-sectional area of the fiber and the various polymers are usually not continuous along the entire length of the fiber, instead usually forming fibrils which start and end at random. Biconstituent fibers are sometimes also referred to as multiconstituent fibers.
As used herein, the term “non-round fibers” describes fibers having a non-round cross-section, and includes “shaped fibers” and “capillary channel fibers.” Such fibers can be solid or hollow, and they can be tri-lobal, delta-shaped, and are preferably fibers having capillary channels on their outer surfaces. The capillary channels can be of various cross-sectional shapes such as “U-shaped”, “H-shaped”, “C-shaped” and “V-shaped”. One preferred capillary channel fiber is T-401, designated as 4DG fiber available from Fiber Innovation Technologies, Johnson City, Tenn. T-401 fiber is a polyethylene terephthalate (PET polyester).
As used herein, the term “integral” as in “integral extension” when used for the tufts 6 refers to fibers of the tufts 6 having originated from the fibers of the precursor webs. For example, fibers in tufts 6 can be integral with, i.e., originated in, first precursor web 20. Therefore, the looped fibers 8 and non-looped fibers 18 of tufts 6, can be plastically deformed and extended fibers of the first precursor web 20, and are, therefore, integral with first precursor web 20. As used herein, “integral” is to be distinguished from fibers introduced to or added to a separate precursor web for the purpose of making tufts, as is commonly done in conventional carpet making, for example.
The number, spacing, and dimensions of tufts 6 can be varied to give varying texture to first side 3 of web 1. For example, if tufts 6 are sufficiently closely spaced the first side 3 of web 1 can have a terry cloth-like feel. Alternatively, tufts 6 can be arranged in patterns such as lines or filled shapes to create portions of a laminate web having greater texture, softness, bulk, absorbency or visual design appeal. For example, when tufts 6 are arranged in a pattern of a line or lines, the tufts can have the appearance of stitching. Tufts 6 can also be arranged to form specific shapes, such as designs, words or logos. Such shapes can be used, for example, on laminates useful for hotel bath towels or robes which can have the name or logo of the hotel formed thereon. Likewise, the size dimensions, such as the height, length and width of individual tufts 6 can be varied. Single tufts can be as long as about 3 cm in length and can be made alone or dispersed among tufts of various sizes.
First precursor web 20 can be a fibrous woven or nonwoven web comprising fibers having sufficient elongation properties to have portions formed into tufts 6 as described more fully below. Tufts are formed by urging fibers out-of-plane in the Z-direction at discrete, localized, portions of precursor webs. The urging out-of-plane can be due to fiber displacement, i.e., the fiber is able to move relative to other fibers and be “pulled,” so to speak, out-of-plane. More often, however, for most nonwoven precursor webs, the urging out-of-plane is due to the fibers of tufts 6 having been at least partially plastically stretched and permanently deformed to form tufts 6. Therefore, in one embodiment, depending on the desired height of tufts 6, the constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor webs can exhibit an elongation to break of at least about 5%, more preferably at least about 10%, more preferably at least about 25%, more preferably at least about 50%, and more preferably at least about 100%. Elongation to break can be determined by simple tensile testing, such as by use of Instron tensile testing equipment, and can generally be found on material data sheets from suppliers of such fibers or webs.
It can be appreciated that a suitable precursor webs should comprise fibers capable of experiencing sufficient plastic deformation and tensile elongation, or are capable of sufficient fiber mobility, such that looped fibers 8 are formed. However, it is recognized that a certain percentage of fibers urged out of the plane of the first surface 12 will not form a loop, but instead will break and form loose ends. Such fibers are referred to herein as “loose” fibers or “loose fiber ends” 18 as shown in
First precursor web 20 can be a fibrous woven or nonwoven web comprising elastic or elastomeric fibers. Elastic or elastomeric fibers can be stretched at least about 50% and return to within 10% of their original dimension. Tufts 6 can be formed from elastic fibers if the fibers are simply displaced due to the mobility of the fiber within the nonwoven, or if the fibers are stretched beyond their elastic limit and are plastically deformed.
Second precursor web 21 can be virtually any web material, the only requirement being that it have sufficient integrity to be formed into the laminate by the process described below. In one embodiment, it can have sufficiently less elongation properties relative to first precursor web 20, such that upon experiencing the strain of fibers from first precursor web 20 being urged out-of-plane in the direction of second precursor web 21, second precursor web 21 will rupture, e.g., by tearing due to extensional failure, such that portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., “punch through” so to speak), second precursor web 21 to form tufts 6 on first side 3 of web 1. In one embodiment second precursor web 21 is a polymer film. Second precursor web 21 can also have sufficient elongation properties to be formed into looped fibers, as described above with respect to first precursor web 20.
A representative tuft 6 for the embodiment of web 1 shown in
As can be appreciated by the description herein, in many embodiments of web 1 openings 4 of second precursor web 21 will have a distinct linear orientation and a longitudinal axis, which is oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis L of its corresponding tuft 6. Likewise, openings 4 will also have a transverse axis generally orthogonal to longitudinal axis in the MD-CD plane.
As shown in
In one embodiment, flaps 7 may extend out of plane significantly, even being as high, so to speak, as the tufts 6 themselves. In this embodiment flaps 7 can cause the tufts 6 to be more resilient and less susceptible to flattening due to compressive or bending forces. In one embodiment, therefore, the laminate web 1 comprises at least two layers (i.e., precursor webs 20 and 21), and both layers affect the tactile qualities and compression resistance of tufts 6.
Tufts 6 preferably comprise looped fibers from both precursor webs. Therefore, tufts 6 can be, in a sense, either “punched through” second precursor web 21 or “pushed into” the tufts of second precursor web 21. In either case, it can be said that first and second precursor webs can be “locked” in place by frictional engagement with openings 4. In some embodiments, for example, the lateral width of opening 4 (i.e., the dimension measured parallel to its transverse axis) can be less than the maximum width of the tooth that formed the opening (per the process described below). This indicates a certain amount of recovery at the opening that tends to constrain tuft 6 from pulling back out through opening 4. The frictional engagement of the tufts and openings provides for a laminate web structure having permanent tufting on one side that can be formed without adhesives or thermal bonding.
Because in some embodiments at least one of the layers (e.g., a relatively low elongation polymer film or tissue paper second precursor web 21 in
As shown in
In contrast, non-looped fibers 18 are integral with, but only begin in first precursor web 20 and have a free end extending outwardly in the Z-direction from first surface 13 of second precursor web 21. Loose fibers 18 can also have a generally uniform alignment described as having a significant or major vector component parallel to the Z-CD plane.
For both looped fibers 8 and loose fibers 18, the alignment is a characteristic of tufts 6 prior to any post-manufacture deformation due to winding onto a roll, or compression in use in an article of manufacture.
As used herein, a looped fiber 8 oriented at an angle of greater than 45 degrees from the longitudinal axis L when viewed in plan view, as in
The orientation of looped fibers 8 in the tufts 6 is to be contrasted with the fiber composition and orientation for first precursor web 20, which, for nonwoven webs is best described as having a substantially randomly-oriented fiber alignment. In a woven web embodiment, the orientation of the looped fibers 8 in tufts 6 could be the same as described above, but the fibers of first precursor web 20 would have the orientation associated with the particular weaving process used to make the web, e.g., a square weave pattern.
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, due to the preferred method of forming tufts 6, as described below, another characteristic of tufts 6 comprising predominantly looped, aligned fibers 8, can be their generally open structure characterized by open void area 10 defined interiorly of tufts 6, as shown in
Additionally, as a consequence of a preferred method of making web 1, the second side 5 of web 1 exhibits discontinuities 16 characterized by a generally linear indentation defined by formerly random fibers of the second surface 14 of first precursor web 20 having been urged directionally (i.e., in the “Z-direction” generally orthogonal to the MD-CD plane as shown in
From the description of web 1 comprising a nonwoven first precursor web 20, it can be seen that the fibers 8 or 18 of tuft 6 can originate and extend from either the first surface 12 or the second surface 14 of first precursor web 20. Of course the fibers 8 or 18 of tuft 6 can also extend from the interior 28 of first precursor web 20. As shown in
Therefore, from the above description, it is understood that in one embodiment web 1 can be described as being a laminate web formed by selective mechanical deformation of at least a first and second precursor webs, at least the first precursor web being a nonwoven web, the laminate web having a first side, the first side comprising the second precursor web and a plurality of discrete tufts, each of the discrete tufts comprising a plurality of tufted fibers being integral extensions of the first precursor web and extending through the second precursor web; and a second side, the second side comprising the first precursor web.
The extension of fibers 8 or 18 can be accompanied by a general reduction in fiber cross sectional dimension (e.g., diameter for round fibers) due to plastic deformation of the fibers and Poisson's ratio effects. Therefore, the aligned looped fibers 8 of tuft 6 can have an average fiber diameter less than the average fiber diameter of the fibers of first precursor web 20. It is believed that this reduction in fiber diameter contributes to the perceived softness of the first side 3 of web 1, a softness that can be comparable to cotton terry cloth, depending on the material properties of the first precursor web 20. It has been found that the reduction in fiber cross-sectional dimension is greatest intermediate the base 17 and the distal portion 31 of tuft 6. This is believed to be due to the preferred method of making, as disclosed more fully below. Briefly, as shown on
Referring to
In
The method of making a web 1 of the present invention in a commercially viable continuous process is depicted in
The process and apparatus of the present invention is similar in many respects to a process described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,518,801 entitled “Web Materials Exhibiting Elastic-Like Behavior” and referred to in subsequent patent literature as “SELF” webs, which stands for “Structural Elastic-like Film”. However, there are significant differences between the apparatus and process of the present invention and the apparatus and process disclosed in the '801 patent, and the differences are apparent in the respective webs produced thereby. As described below, the teeth 110 of roll 104 have a specific geometry associated with the leading and trailing edges that permit the teeth to essentially “punch” through the precursor webs 20, 21 as opposed to, in essence, deforming the web. In a two layer laminate web 1 the teeth 110 urge fibers from a first precursor web 20 simultaneously out-of-plane and through second precursor web 21, which is punctured, so to speak, by the teeth 110 pushing the fibers 8 through to form tufts 6. Therefore, a web 1 of the present invention can have tufts 6 of loose fiber ends 18 and/or “tunnel-like” tufts 6 of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through and away from the surface 13 of a first side 3, unlike the “tent-like” rib-like elements of SELF webs which each have continuous side walls associated therewith, i.e., a continuous “transition zone,” and which do not exhibit interpenetration of one layer through another layer.
Precursor webs 20 and 21 are provided either directly from their respective web making processes or indirectly from supply rolls (neither shown) and moved in the machine direction to the nip 116 of counter-rotating intermeshing rolls 102 and 104. The precursor webs are preferably held in a sufficient web tension so as to enter the nip 16 in a generally flattened condition by means well known in the art of web handling. As each precursor web 20, 21 goes through the nip 116 the teeth 110 of roll 104 which are intermeshed with grooves 108 of roll 102 simultaneously urge portions of first precursor web 20 out of the plane of first precursor web 20 and through second precursor web 21 to form tufts 6. In effect, teeth 110 “push” or “punch” fibers of first precursor web 20 through second precursor web 21.
As the tip of teeth 110 push through first and second precursor webs 20, 21 the portions of the fibers of the precursor webs that are oriented predominantly in the CD across teeth 110 are urged by the teeth 110 out of the plane of first precursor web 20. Fibers can be urged out of plane due to fiber mobility, or they can be urged out of plane by being stretched and/or plastically deformed in the Z-direction. Portions of first precursor web 20 urged out of plane by teeth 110 can also push fibers of second precursor web 21 of the plane, or they can push through second precursor web 21, (if it has relatively lower extensibility), thereby resulting in formation of tufts 6 on first side 3 of web 1. Fibers of precursor webs 20 and/or 21 that are predominantly oriented generally parallel to the longitudinal axis L, i.e., in the MD of precursor web 20 as shown in
It can be appreciated by the forgoing description that when web 1 is made by the apparatus and method of the present invention that the precursor webs 20, 21 can possess differing material properties with respect to the ability of the precursor webs to elongate before failure, e.g., failure due to tensile stresses. In particular, a nonwoven first precursor web 20 can have greater fiber mobility and/or greater fiber elongation characteristics relative to second precursor web 21, such that the fibers thereof can move or stretch sufficiently to form tufts 6 while the second precursor web 21 ruptures, i.e., does not stretch to the extent necessary to form tufts. However, in other embodiments, both precursor webs have sufficient elongation such that fibers thereof can move or stretch sufficiently to form tufts 6.
The degree to which the fibers of nonwoven precursor webs are able to extend out of plane without plastic deformation can depend upon the degree of inter-fiber bonding of the precursor web. For example, if the fibers of a nonwoven precursor web are only very loosely entangled to each other, they will be more able to slip by each other (i.e., to move relative to adjacent fibers by reptation) and therefore be more easily extended out of plane to form tufts. On the other hand, fibers of a nonwoven precursor web that are more strongly bonded, for example by high levels of thermal point bonding, hydroentanglement, or the like, will more likely require greater degrees of plastic deformation in extended out-of-plane tufts. Therefore, in one embodiment, first precursor web 20 can be a nonwoven web having relatively low inter-fiber bonding, and second precursor web 21 can be a nonwoven web having relatively high inter-fiber bonding, such that the fibers of first precursor web can extend out of plane, while the fibers of second precursor web 21 cannot. Upon sufficient force applied to first precursor web 21, the fibers therein tend to extend, while the fibers of second precursor web, unable to extend, tend to break.
The number, spacing, and size of tufts 6 can be varied by changing the number, spacing, and size of teeth 110 and making corresponding dimensional changes as necessary to roll 104 and/or roll 102. This variation, together with the variation possible in precursor webs 20, 21 permits many varied webs 1 to be made for many purposes. For example, web 1 made from a first precursor web 20 comprising a relatively high basis weight woven fabric having MD and CD woven plastically-extensible threads and a second precursor web 21 comprising relatively high basis weight, relatively low-extensible synthetic polymer nonwoven material could be made into a strong, porous ground covering, such as an erosion control device useful for reducing sloping path deterioration and enabling growth of indigenous vegetation in unstable soil.
An enlarged view of teeth 110 is shown in
As shown in
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that if the fibers of the precursor webs have a highly curvilinear shape, e.g., curled fibers, the resultant tufts 6 will have more looped fibers 8 and less broken fibers 18 as compared to more linear fiber conformations. It is believed that such fiber conformations have a lesser chance of bridging between two adjacent teeth, and, as a result they are less prone to be stretched beyond their breaking point, and thus have a greater chance of forming complete loop structures. Furthermore, such curvilinear-shaped fibers can be made by using eccentric bicomponent fibers, or side-by-side bicomponent fibers, such as bicomponent fibers consisting of polyethylene and nylon.
In preferred embodiments first and second precursor webs are nonwoven webs in which there are minimal fiber-to-fiber bonds. For example, the precursor web can be a nonwoven web having a pattern of discrete thermal point bonds, as is commonly known in the art for nonwoven webs. In general, however, it is desirable to minimize the number of bond points and maximize the spacing so as to allow for maximum fiber mobility and dislocation at during formation of tufts 6. In general, utilizing fibers having relatively high diameters, and/or relatively high extension to break, and/or relatively high fiber mobility, results in better and more distinctly formed tufts 6.
Although web 1 is disclosed in preferred embodiments as a two layer web made from two precursor webs, it is not necessary that it be limited to two layers. For example, a three-layer or more laminate can be made from three precursor webs, as long as one of the precursor webs can extend and push through openings in another layer to form tufts. For example, web 1 could comprise the top sheet, secondary topsheet, and core of a feminine hygiene product. In general, it is not necessary that adhesive or other bonding means be utilized to make laminate web 1.
The constituent layers of web 1 (e.g., precursor webs 20 and 21 and any other layers) can be held in a face-to-face laminated relationship by virtue of the “locking” effect of the tufts 6 that extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21. In some embodiments it may be desirable to use adhesives or thermal bonding or other bonding means, depending on the end use application of web 1. For example, a web 1 comprising bicomponent fiber nonwoven webs can be through-air bonded after formation of tufts 6 to provide for layer-to-layer adhesion for greater peel strength. Additionally, it may be desirable to apply adhesive to at least a portion of one of the precursor webs. For example, in some embodiments adhesive, chemical bonding, resin or powder bonding, or thermal bonding between layers can be selectively applied to certain regions or all of the precursor webs. In the case of adhesive application, for example, adhesive can be applied in a continuous manner, such as by slot coating, or in a discontinuous manner, such as by spraying, extruding, and the like. Discontinuous application of adhesive can be in the form of stripes, bands, droplets, and the like.
In a multilayer web 1 each precursor web can have different material properties, thereby providing web 1 with beneficial properties when used as a topsheet in a disposable absorbent article such as a sanitary napkin. For example, web 1 comprising two (or more) precursor webs, e.g., first and second precursor webs, can have beneficial fluid handling properties. For superior fluid handling, for example, first precursor web 20 can be comprised of relatively hydrophilic fibers. Second precursor web 21 can be comprised of relatively hydrophobic fibers. The tufts 6 of such a web could form a topsheet having a relatively hydrophobic body-facing surface, with hydrophilic tufts to pull fluid away from the body and through the topsheet. Fluid deposited upon the upper, relatively hydrophilic tufts can be quickly transported away from the relatively hydrophobic layer to the portion of the article underlying the second precursor web layer (e.g., the absorbent core). Without being bound by theory, it is believed that one reason for the observed compression resistance of web 1 is the generally vertically-aligned fibers 8, 18 of tufts 6. The fibers 8, 18 form directionally-aligned support columns that resist compression.
Web 1 is especially useful as a topsheet 206 of sanitary napkin 200. Web 1 is particularly beneficial as a topsheet 206 for sanitary napkins due to the combination of excellent fluid acquisition and compression resistance for the prevention of rewet to the body-facing surface of topsheet 206 when in use. Rewet can be a result of at least two causes: (1) squeezing out of the absorbed fluid due to pressure on the sanitary napkin 200; and/or (2) wetness entrapped within or on the topsheet 206. In a preferred topsheet 206 both properties, fluid acquisition and compression resistance, are maximized and rewet is minimized. Said differently, preferably a topsheet will exhibit high rates of fluid acquisition, and low levels of rewet.
In a sanitary napkin of the present invention, topsheet 206 can have applied thereto a lotion composition. The lotion composition can be any of known lotions, such as lotions comprising petrolatum, which can provide a skin benefit to the user. In a preferred embodiment, the lotion also provides a clean body benefit to the user. That is, the lotion preferably renders menses less susceptible to sticking to the body, including hair and skin. Preferably, therefore, the lotion is hydrophobic, and renders hair and skin hydrophobic.
Lotion can be applied in any manner known in the art for applying lotions to nonwoven webs. Lotion can be applied to the tips (i.e., the distal ends) of tufts 6. It has been found that applying lotion to the tips enables efficient transfer to the skin of the wearer. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the tufts act as little brushes to wipe the lotion onto the body during motion, such as walking.
The lotion of the present invention can include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,025; U.S. Pat. No. 6,627,787; U.S. Pat. No. 6,498,284; U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,444; U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,652; U.S. Pat. No. 3,489,148; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,503,526; 6,287,581; U.S. Pat. No. 6,475,197; U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,394; U.S. Pat. No. 6,503,524; U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,961; WO 2000038747; or EP-A 927,050.
In addition to (or instead of) lotion treatments, the topsheet 206 (or portions thereof) can be treated with other materials or compositions to render it sufficiently hydrophobic. For example, the topsheet can be treated with silicone treatments, low surface energy treatments, fluorinated hydrocarbon treatments. In general, relatively hydrophobic means a material or composition having a contact angle with water of at least about 70 degrees, preferably at least about 90 degrees. In general, low surface energy means less than about 55 dynes per square centimeter, preferably less than about 26 dynes per square centimeter, and more preferably from about 30 to about 50 dynes per square centimeter.
In a preferred embodiment, web 1 is used as a topsheet 206 in conjunction with a high capacity and highly absorbent core 204. In general, a preferred absorbent core is an airlaid core of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,445,777; or U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,414. In a preferred embodiment, absorbent core 204 is the type generally referred to as HIPE foams, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,167; U.S. Pat. No. 5,387,207; U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,711; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,015. In a preferred embodiment, absorbent core 204 has a capacity after desorption at 30 cm of less than about 10% of its free absorbent capacity; a capillary absorption pressure of from about 3 to about 20 cm; a capillary desorption pressure of from about 8 to about 25 cm; a resistance to compression deflection of from about 5 to about 85% when measured under a confining pressure of 0.74 psi; and a free absorbent capacity of from about 4 to 125 grams/gram. Each of these parameters can be determined as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,167, issued Aug. 27, 1996 to DesMarais. One advantage of utilizing the airlaid or HIPE foam cores as disclosed is that the absorbent core can be made very thin. For example, an absorbent core of the present invention can have an average caliper (thickness) of less than about 20 mm, preferably less than about 10 mm, and the thickness can be less than about 5 mm.
Table 1 shown below shows compression data for webs of the present invention, as well as comparison webs. In Table 1, Sample Nos. 1-3, 5 and 7 are comparison samples and Sample Nos. 4, 6, and 8-13 are webs of the present invention.
Sample 1 is a formed polyethylene film comparable to DRI-WEAVE® topsheets used on ALWAYS® sanitary napkins, available from Tredegar Film Products, Terre Haute, Ind.
Sample 2 is a formed polyethylene film made by Tredegar Film Products, Terre Haute, Ind., according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,629,643 issued to Curro et al. on Dec. 16, 1986.
Sample 3 is a 30 gsm spunbond web of 50/50 PE/PP bicomponent fibers available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Sample 4 is a web of the present invention made from the web of Sample 3 processed according to the process described herein.
Sample 5 is a carded nonwoven web comprising 50% 6 denier (dpf) PE/PP bicomponent fibers and 50% 6 denier PET fibers, available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Sample 6 is made by the process as described herein from the web of Sample 5.
Samples 4 and 6 are made with one precursor web by the process described herein. Samples 8-13 are made according to the present invention using two precursor webs as described herein, and where both precursor webs contribute fibers to the tufts, in a nested configuration, so to speak. Thus, the fibers of the second precursor web are not “punched through” but rather are formed into a tuft along with fibers of the first precursor web, the two webs contributing fibers to the tufts.
Sample 8 is made by the process as described herein from the two layer laminate of fibrous nonwoven web of Sample 7. The first layer of Sample 7 comprises a 30 gsm web of 50/50 PE/PP bicomponent fibers and the second layer is a 45 gsm web comprising 50% 6 denier 50/50 PE/PP bicomponent fibers and 50% 9 denier PP fibers. Both webs are available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Sample 9 is made by the process as described herein from a two layer laminate wherein the first and second layers comprise a 30 gsm web of PE/PP bicomponent fibers and the second layer is also surfactant treated to impart a relatively higher level of hydrophilicity, as is known in the art. The 30 gsm webs are available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Sample 10 is made by the process as described herein from a two layer laminate of fibrous nonwoven webs wherein the first layer comprises a 30 gsm web of PE/PP bicomponent fibers and the second layer is a 45 gsm web comprising 50% 6 denier PE/PP bicomponent fibers and 50% 6 denier PET fibers. Both webs are available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Sample 11 is made by the process as described herein from a two layer laminate of fibrous nonwoven webs wherein the first layer comprises a 30 gsm web of PE/PP bicomponent fibers from Pegas, Czech Republic, and the second layer is a 45 gsm web comprising 50% 6 denier PE/PP bicomponent fibers and 50% 6 denier PET fibers, available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Samples 12 and 13 are each made by the process as described herein from a two layer laminate of fibrous nonwoven webs wherein the first layer comprises a 30 gsm web of 50/50 PE/PP bicomponent fibers and the second layer is a 45 gsm web comprising 50% 6 denier 50/50 PE/PP bicomponent fibers and 50% 6 denier PET fibers. Both precursor webs are available from BBA, Simpsonville, S.C.
Each of the Samples of the present invention shown in Table 1 were processed according to the present invention through the nip of intermeshing rolls as described above, with a pitch P of 1.5 mm (about 0.060 inch), a tooth height TH of about 3.7 mm (about 0.145 inch), a tooth distance TD of 1.6 mm (about 0.063 inches) and a tooth length TL of 1.25 mm (about 0.050 inch). The depth of engagement DOE and line speed are shown in Table 1 for each sample of the present invention.
As shown in Table 1, webs of the present invention have excellent density and specific volume properties under loads simulating loads experienced in the wearing of a sanitary napkin. For example, 0.004 psi can correspond to a pressure experienced while standing, while 0.23 psi can correspond to a pressure when sitting on a soft surface, and 0.75 se can correspond to sitting on a hard surface.
Void volume and specific volume can be determined by the following methods:
Void Volume
Void volume under compression was calculated at 0.004, 0.23, and 0.75 pounds per square inch pressure using an MTS tensile tester. The tensile tester measured the resisting force as a material was compressed between a movable platen and a fixed base. The material was compressed at a constant rate to a force of 1000 g. Force and platen position were recorded.
Void volume for a given platen position is calculated using the equation:
Where:
For webs made with multiple fiber types, the web fiber density is the weight average of each individual fiber density:
ρfiber,total=(wt %fiber1)(ρfiber1)+(wt %fiber2)(ρfiber2)+ . . .
Where:
Suitable equipment for this test could include a tensile tester (MTS model Alliance RT/1 with Test Works software and 50 N load cell). The tester must have a fixed base larger in size than the platen. The zero height between the platen and base is set by bringing the platen down until the first substantial force is measured, the platen is then backed up one increment, and the cross head position is zeroed. The sample gage length for each sample is set by raising the platen above the fixed base to a distance greater than the initial thickness of the material. From this position the platen is lowered until a force of 1 gf is applied to the sample. This position from the zero height is recorded as the initial platen position (x0) and the cross head position is re-zeroed.
In this test a 4.9 cm diameter circular platen was used to compress materials against the base at a rate of 0.51 cm/min from 1 to 1000 gf. (0.75 pounds per square inch pressure). The platen was then returned at the same rate to the initial platen position for each sample. The initial platen position or test gage length varied depending on the thickness of the material as described above. Five repeats were performed on separate sample pieces, and the five results averaged. Each material sample tested was larger in area than the platen, but smaller in area than the fixed base.
Specific Volume
Specific Volume under compression was calculated at 0.004, 0.23, and 0.75 pounds per square inch pressure using an MTS tensile tester. The tensile tester measured the resisting force as a material was compressed between a movable platen and a fixed base. The material was compressed at a constant rate to a force of 1000 g. Force and platen position were recorded.
Specific volume for a given platen position is calculated using the equation:
SV=1/ρweb
Web Density for a given platen position is calculated using the equation:
Where:
Suitable equipment for this test could include a tensile tester (MTS model Alliance RT/1 with Test Works software and 50 N load cell). The tester must have a fixed base larger in size than the platen. The zero height between the platen and base is set by bringing the platen down until the first substantial force is measured, the platen is then backed up one increment, and the cross head position is zeroed. The sample gage length for each sample is set by raising the platen above the fixed base to a distance greater than the initial thickness of the material. From this position the platen is lowered until a force of 1 gf is applied to the sample. This position from the zero height is recorded as the initial platen position (x0) and the cross head position is re-zeroed.
In this test a 4.9 cm diameter circular platen was used to compress materials against the base at a rate of 0.51 cm/min from 1 to 1000 gf. (0.75 pounds per square inch pressure). The platen was then returned at the same rate to the initial platen position for each sample. The initial platen position or test gage length varied depending on the thickness of the material as described above. Five repeats were performed on separate sample pieces and the five results averaged. Each material sample tested was larger in area than the platen, but smaller in area than the fixed base.
As can be understood from the above description of webs 1 and apparatus 100 of the present invention, many various structures of webs 1 can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as claimed in the appended claims. For example, topsheet 206 can additionally be coated or treated with medicaments, cleaning fluids, anti-bacterial solutions, emulsions, fragrances, or surfactants. Likewise, apparatus 100 can be configured to only form tufts 6 on a portion of the web 1, or to form varying sizes or area densities of tufts 6.
Another advantage of the process described to produce the webs of the present invention is that the webs can be produced in-line with other web production equipment or in-line with disposable absorbent article production equipment. Additionally, there may be other solid state formation processes that can be used either prior to or after the process of the present invention. For example, a web could be processed according to the present invention and then apertured with a stretching process, such as one described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,639 to Curro et al. Alternatively, a material could be made into a composite through a variety of processes, such as one described in US Publication No. 2003/028,165A1 to Curro et al. or ring rolled, for example as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,897 to Weber et al. and then processed according to the present invention. The resulting webs can thus exhibit the combined benefits of these multiple material modifications.
All documents cited in the Detailed Description of the Invention are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention. To the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this written document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to the term in this written document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/158,165, filed Jun. 21, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,459, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/581,543, filed Jun. 21, 2004, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/158,165 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/737,306, filed Dec. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,553,532, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/435,996, filed May 12, 2003, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/324,661, filed Dec. 20, 2002, now abandoned, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/158,165 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/737,430, filed Dec. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,410,683, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/610,299, filed Jun. 30, 2003, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/324,661, filed Dec. 20, 2002, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2068456 | Hooper | Jan 1937 | A |
2275425 | Grabec | Mar 1942 | A |
2404758 | Teague et al. | Jul 1946 | A |
2633441 | Buttress | Mar 1953 | A |
2748863 | Benton | Jun 1956 | A |
2924863 | Chavannes | Feb 1960 | A |
3073304 | Schaar | Jan 1963 | A |
3081500 | Griswold et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3081512 | Griswold | Mar 1963 | A |
3097787 | Schur | Jul 1963 | A |
3137893 | Gelpke | Jun 1964 | A |
3355974 | Carmichael | Dec 1967 | A |
3511740 | Sanders | May 1970 | A |
3542634 | Such et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3566726 | Politis | Mar 1971 | A |
3579763 | Sommer | May 1971 | A |
3681182 | Kalwaites | Aug 1972 | A |
3681183 | Kalwaites | Aug 1972 | A |
3684284 | Tranfield | Aug 1972 | A |
3695270 | Zdenek | Oct 1972 | A |
3718059 | Clayton | Feb 1973 | A |
3760671 | Jenkins | Sep 1973 | A |
3881987 | Benz | May 1975 | A |
3949127 | Ostermeier et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3965906 | Karami | Jun 1976 | A |
4035881 | Zocher et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4042453 | Conway | Aug 1977 | A |
4135021 | Patchell et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4276336 | Sabee | Jun 1981 | A |
4379799 | Holmes | Apr 1983 | A |
4397644 | Matthews et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4433018 | Tesch et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4465726 | Holmes et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4469734 | Minto et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4588630 | Shimalla | May 1986 | A |
4596567 | Iskra | Jun 1986 | A |
4741941 | Englebert et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758297 | Calligarich | Jul 1988 | A |
4781962 | Zamarripa et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4798604 | Carter | Jan 1989 | A |
4820294 | Morris | Apr 1989 | A |
4840829 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4859519 | Cabe, Jr. et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4886632 | Van Iten et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4935087 | Gilman | Jun 1990 | A |
4953270 | Gilpatrick | Sep 1990 | A |
5019062 | Ryan et al. | May 1991 | A |
5062418 | Dyer | Nov 1991 | A |
5144730 | Dilo | Sep 1992 | A |
5165979 | Watkins et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171238 | Kajander | Dec 1992 | A |
5180620 | Mende | Jan 1993 | A |
5188625 | Van Iten et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5223319 | Cotton et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5242632 | Mende | Sep 1993 | A |
5382245 | Thompson | Jan 1995 | A |
5383870 | Takai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387209 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5414914 | Suzuki et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415640 | Kirby et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429854 | Currie et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437653 | Gilman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5470326 | Dabi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5508080 | Sorimachi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518801 | Chappell et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533991 | Kirby et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5554145 | Roe | Sep 1996 | A |
5560794 | Currie et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5567501 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
D375844 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1996 | S |
5573719 | Fitting | Nov 1996 | A |
5575874 | Griesbach, III et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580418 | Alikhan | Dec 1996 | A |
5599420 | Yeo et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624427 | Bergman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624729 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626571 | Young et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628097 | Benson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648142 | Phillips | Jul 1997 | A |
5650214 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656119 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658639 | Curro et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667619 | Alikhan | Sep 1997 | A |
5667625 | Alikhan | Sep 1997 | A |
5691035 | Chappell et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700255 | Curro | Dec 1997 | A |
5704101 | Majors et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709829 | Giacometti | Jan 1998 | A |
5714107 | Levy et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723087 | Chappell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725927 | Zilg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730738 | McFall et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743776 | Igaue | Apr 1998 | A |
5792404 | Cree et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804007 | Asano | Sep 1998 | A |
5804021 | Abuto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814389 | Giacometti | Sep 1998 | A |
5817394 | Alikhan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841107 | Riva | Nov 1998 | A |
5858504 | Fitting | Jan 1999 | A |
5876391 | Roe et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879494 | Hoff et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891544 | Chappell et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895623 | Trokhan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5914084 | Benson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916661 | Benson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919177 | Georger et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925026 | Arteman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932316 | Cree et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964742 | McCormack et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968029 | Chappell | Oct 1999 | A |
5986167 | Arteman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993432 | Lodge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007468 | Giacometti | Dec 1999 | A |
6025050 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027483 | Chappell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039555 | Tsuji et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048600 | Hansson | Apr 2000 | A |
6096016 | Tsuji et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114263 | Benson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117524 | Hisanaka et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120718 | Kotek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129801 | Benson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155083 | Goeser et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168849 | Braverman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176954 | Tsuji et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6247914 | Lindquist et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D444631 | Woodbridge et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6264872 | Majors et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287407 | Stein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6383431 | Dobrin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395122 | Hisanaka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395211 | Dettmer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6410823 | Daley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417426 | Takai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420625 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423884 | Oehmen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451718 | Yamada et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452064 | Thoren et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458447 | Cabell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486379 | Chen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
D466702 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6506329 | Curro et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6537936 | Busam et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570054 | Gatto et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6620485 | Benson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632504 | Gillespie et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
D481872 | Hennel et al. | Nov 2003 | S |
6647549 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669878 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6716498 | Curro et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726870 | Benson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733610 | Mizutani et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736916 | Steinke et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6793930 | Gatto et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794626 | Kiermeier et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808791 | Curro et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818802 | Takai et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830800 | Curro et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837956 | Cowell et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855220 | Wildeman | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863960 | Curro et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872274 | Kauschke et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878433 | Curro et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884494 | Curro et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888046 | Toyoshima et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7005558 | Johansson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7033645 | Gatto et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037569 | Curro et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7267860 | Toyoshima et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303808 | Taneichi et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20020029445 | Stein et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039867 | Curro et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020082574 | Nakashita | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020105110 | Dobrin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119720 | Arora et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132544 | Takagaki | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165508 | Klofta et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030021951 | Desai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028165 | Curro et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030085213 | Burckhardt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030191442 | Bewick-Sonntag | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191443 | Taylor | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040022993 | Wildeman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040121686 | Wong et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122396 | Maldonado et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126531 | Harvey et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131820 | Turner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137200 | Chhabra et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157036 | Provost et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161991 | Walton et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040229008 | Hoying | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242097 | Hasenoehrl et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265533 | Hoying et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265534 | Curro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050064136 | Turner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096614 | Perez et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123726 | Broering et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050281976 | Curro et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283129 | Hammons et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019056 | Turner et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060087053 | O'Donnell et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060286343 | Curro et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 21 155 | Jan 1995 | DE |
0 509 012 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 955 159 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0 963 747 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1 004 412 | May 2000 | EP |
2 713 083 | Jun 1995 | FR |
S-48-107981 | Dec 1973 | JP |
2002-200112 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003-275240 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO 9515138 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9962446 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0176523 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02100632 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2005011936 | Feb 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090157030 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60581543 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11158165 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12370850 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10737306 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11158165 | US | |
Parent | 10435996 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10737306 | US | |
Parent | 10324661 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10435996 | US | |
Parent | 10737430 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11158165 | US | |
Parent | 10610299 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10737430 | US | |
Parent | 10324661 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10610299 | US |