1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to compression refrigeration system including a compressor, a heat rejector, an expansion means and a heat absorber connected in a closed circulation circuit that may operate with supercritical high-side pressure, using carbon dioxide or a mixture containing carbon dioxide as the refrigerant in the system.
2. Description of Prior Art
Conventional vapor compression systems reject heat by condensation of the refrigerant at subcritical pressure given by the saturation pressure at the given temperature. These refrigerants are most often selected so that the maximum pressure occurring in the system should be well below the critical pressure of the refrigerant and usually not exceeding a given limit, for example 25 bar.
When using a refrigerant with low critical temperature, for instance CO2, the pressure at heat rejection will have to be supercritical if the temperature of the heat sink is high, for instance higher than the critical temperature of the refrigerant, in order to obtain efficient operation of the system. The cycle of operation will then be transcritical, for instance as known from WO 90/07683.
WO 94/14016 and WO 97/27437 both describe a simple circuit for realizing such a system, in basis comprising a compressor, a heat rejector, an expansion means and an evaporator connected in a closed circuit. CO2 is the preferred refrigerant for both of them due to environmental concerns.
A major drawback for both WO 94/14016 and WO 97/27437 is that very high pressures will occur in the systems during standstill at high ambient temperatures. As explained in WO 97/27437, the pressure will typically be higher than 100 bar at 60° C. This will require a very high design pressure for all the components, resulting in heavy and costly components. Especially this is a drawback in design of hermetic compressors, for which the shell size is dictated by the size of the electrical motor.
WO 94/14016 describes how this can be improved by connecting a separate pressure relieving expansion vessel connected to the low side of the circuit via a valve. The disadvantage of this is that it will increase the cost and complexity of the system.
Yet another drawback of WO 94/14016 and WO 97/27437 is that the charge specifications, respectively 0.55 to 0.7 kg/l and 0.25 to 0.45 kg/l of internal volume of the system will result in too high charge to be optimal for systems for instance operating at lower temperatures of heat absorption and/or using hermetically sealed compressors, having a large gas volume on the low-side of the system.
Another drawback of WO 94/14016 and WO 97/27437 is that they do not take into consideration that the optimal charge of the system will be strongly influenced by the solubility of the refrigerant in the lubricant for systems with lubricated compressors and also by constructive elements of the system.
A major object of the present invention is to make a simple, efficient system that avoids the aforementioned shortcomings and disadvantages.
As stated above the invention is based on a simple circuit comprising at least a compressor, a heat rejector, an expansion means and a heat absorber. Based on the fact that the prior art references commented above deals with refrigeration circuits with high refrigerant charges, the inventors, through testing and simulations, surprisingly found that by adapting the internal volume of components that contain refrigerant vapor/gas during normal operation in the low pressure side of the system, optimal operating conditions can be obtained with a low charge for a given internal volume of the system. Thus the lowest possible design pressure for the constructive elements of the system can be obtained.
In this way a separate pressure relieving expansion vessel is not needed to avoid excess pressures at stand still conditions at high temperatures, and all components or parts of components in the low-side of the system can be designed for a lower pressure. Calculations and experiments show that maximum standstill pressure at a temperature of 60° C. easily can be kept below 80 bar with CO2 as the refrigerant. The invention can be used to decrease the weight and cost of the system significantly, even with a simple design of the system.
The invention will be further described in the following by way of examples only and with reference to the drawings in which:
When using for instance CO2 as the refrigerant, the high-side pressure may sometime be subcritical, but such a system must be able to operate at supercritical high-side pressure at higher temperatures of the heat sink, in order to obtain optimal efficiency of the system. The high-side of the system must therefore be designed for a correspondingly high operating pressure, for CO2 maybe typically in the range higher than 110 bar if air is used as a heat sink. The low-side of the system, however, will seldom require operating pressures higher than for instance 60 bar, corresponding to an evaporation temperature of about 22° C. The standstill pressure will then often dictate the design pressure of the low-side, since the system often must be able to withstand standstill temperatures up to 60° C. or higher. At these conditions, the pressure level may often be as high as the maximum operating pressure of the high-side of the system if the system may be exposed to these kinds of temperatures.
The importance of the maximum pressure for the design of components is demonstrated by some of the existing codes, standards and common practice. Commonly, five times the maximum pressure is required as the minimum burst pressure. A component that may be exposed to 120 bar will then be required to withstand 600 bar, while a component that may be exposed to 70 bar will only be required to withstand 350 bar. This may lead to a significant difference in manufacturing cost, size and weight. This will be especially important for components such as (semi)hermetic compressors, where the shell size is quite large, dictated by the electrical motor dimensions.
According to the invention it is possible to design the system with regard to refrigerant charge and volume of different components in order to reduce the maximum standstill pressure. Thus, the necessary design pressure for the low-side of the system may be reduced in a simple way, without departing from the optimum high-side pressure during operation of the system. This will contribute to a low-cost system with optimal efficiency.
The intention of the invention may be obtained by adapting the internal volume of components that contain refrigerant vapor/gas during normal operation in the low pressure side of the system, optimal operating conditions can be obtained with a low charge for a given internal volume of the system. Thus the lowest possible design pressure for the constructive elements of the system can be obtained. The volume may for instance be adapted as a larger sized tube, which is relatively inexpensive even for higher pressure ratings, in order to reduce the necessary shell design pressure of a hermetic compressor.
Since the optimum charge will depend on factors like operating conditions, constructive elements of the system and solubility of the refrigerant in the lubricant, the specification of a given charge per unit internal volume of the system is not very relevant or useful in practice. According to the invention the charge is related to a resulting maximum pressure in the system at a given temperature during standstill, meaning that the system has an equalized temperature that is the same for the whole system. According to the invention, this pressure should be lower than 1.26 times the critical pressure of the refrigerant when the temperature of the system is equalized to a temperature up to 60° C. The resulting pressure at his temperature, or any other temperature that is defined as the maximum standstill temperature, will be important in order to define the design pressure of the low-side of the system, as long as the value exceeds the maximum operating pressure of the low-side. For pure CO2 this pressure limit corresponds to a pressure of about 93 bar at the given temperature.
No lower pressure limit is designated for the invention, since lower resulting pressures will satisfy the intentions of the invention, namely to achieve a lowering of the design standstill pressure. However, it is not likely that the standstill pressure at this temperature, 60° C., may be lower than 0.14 times the critical pressure, for pure CO2 corresponding to about 10 bar.
Several improvements in the efficiency or the operating conditions of the system can be obtained using different types of components, like variable capacity compressors, expansion machines, different throttling means, internal heat exchangers, throttling to intermediate pressure or other cycle improvements. Still it will be possible to reduce the design pressure of several parts of the system, and thereby reduce the system cost to a minimum. This will also be valid for a receiver included in the low side of the system, if it is preferable for some reason to include a receiver in the system, not as a separate vessel intended to serve as an expansion vessel, as described in WO 94/14016, but as an integral part of the circulation loop of the system.
A system characterised in that the system operation may be reversed, for example as shown in
The preferred refrigerant according to the invention is carbon dioxide, but the invention can also be used for mixtures of carbon dioxide and other fluids, that may exhibit the same characteristics, operating in a transcritical cycle during certain operating conditions.
It should be stressed that the use of the invention is not limited to the examples and figures explained in the preceding description, but within the scope of the claims the invention is applicable to all systems where the intention of the invention may be utilized.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20014258 | Sep 2001 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO02/00270 | 7/26/2002 | WO | 00 | 8/12/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/021164 | 3/13/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5245836 | Lorentzen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5497631 | Lorentzen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5685160 | Abersfelder et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6105386 | Kuroda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6178761 | Karl | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6343486 | Mizukami | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6427479 | Komatsubara et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428284 | Vaisman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6523360 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6588223 | Dienhart | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591618 | Howard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6698234 | Gopalnarayanan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6786057 | Ben Yahia | Sep 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19832480 | Jan 2000 | DE |
0860309 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0978693 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1132457 | Sep 2001 | EP |
11-201568 | Jul 1999 | JP |
WO 9306423 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9414016 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9727437 | Jul 1997 | WO |
02066907 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040255609 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |