The present application and the resultant patent relate generally to gas turbine engines and more particularly relate to systems and methods for imparting compressive stress to composite airfoils so as to minimize interlaminar tensile stress about the shanks thereof.
Airfoils used in gas turbine engines generally have been made from high temperature superalloys given the high temperature operating environment and the various stresses created during operation. Various types of composite materials also have been used given the lightweight nature and the high temperature capabilities of such composite materials. One drawback with such composite materials, however, includes relatively poor interlaminar properties. Moreover, the overall turbine bucket generally may be subject to nonuniform stress patterns under normal operating conditions. As such, the bucket may experience varying degrees of localized stress at different times and at different locations. Turbine buckets therefore may be designed with more composite material at locations such as the shank and the minimum neck areas so as to accommodate high localized tensile stresses.
There is thus a desire for an improved composite materials turbine bucket design. Preferably such an improved turbine bucket design should accommodate increased interlaminar stresses with the use of less material. Such reduced stresses should increase component life while reducing the amount of material also should result in reduced component costs.
The present application and the resultant patent provide a compressive stress system for a gas turbine engine. The compressive stress system may include a first bucket attached to a rotor, a second bucket attached to the rotor, the first and the second buckets defining a shank pocket therebetween, and a compressive stress spring positioned within the shank pocket. The compressive stress spring asserts a force on the buckets so as to reduce the interlaminar stresses therein.
The present application and the resultant patent further provide a method of reducing interlaminar stresses in a composite material bucket. The method may include the steps of positioning a compressive stress spring in a shank pocket between adjacent buckets, releasing a pair of arms of the compressive stress spring into contact with each of the adjacent buckets, and asserting a compressive force on each of the adjacent buckets by the pair of arms so as to reduce the interlaminar stresses in each of the adjacent buckets.
The present application and the resultant patent further provide a compressive stress system for a gas turbine engine. The compressive stress system may include a first bucket and a second bucket attached to the rotor. The first bucket and the second bucket may include a composite material and may define a shank pocket therebetween. A compressive stress spring may be positioned within the shank pocket so as to assert a force on the first bucket and the second bucket.
These and other features and improvements of the present application and the resultant patent will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the several drawings and the appended claims.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like elements throughout the several views,
The gas turbine engine 10 may use natural gas, various types of syngas, and/or other types of fuels. The gas turbine engine 10 may be any one of a number of different gas turbine engines offered by General Electric Company of Schenectady, N.Y. including, but not limited to, those such as a 7 or a 9 series heavy duty gas turbine engine and the like. The gas turbine engine 10 may have different configurations and may use other types of components. Other types of gas turbine engines also may be used herein. Multiple gas turbine engines, other types of turbines, and other types of power generation equipment also may be used herein together.
Generally described and by way of example only, each turbine bucket 110 may include a dovetail 140, a shank 150, and a platform 160. An airfoil 170 may extend from the platform 160. Each turbine bucket 110 may be positioned within a rotor 180 for rotation therewith. The rotor 180 may include a number of rotor slots 190 separated by rotor posts 200. The rotor slots 190 may be sized and shaped to mate with the dovetails 140 of each turbine bucket 110. The shank 150 may extend from a minimum neck width region 155 to the platform 160. A shank pocket 205 may be defined between the shanks 150 of the adjacent turbine buckets 120, 130 and the rotor post 200. Other components and other configurations may be used herein.
The turbine bucket compressive stress system 100 further may include a compressive stress spring 210. The compressive stress spring 210 may be in the form of a substantially U-shaped clip 220 with a first arm 230 and a second arm 240. The compressive stress spring 210 may be made from any high temperature metallic or composite material with sufficient restoring strength. The compressive stress spring 210 may have any desired size, shape, or configuration. The compressive stress spring 210 also may include a spring dovetail 250. The spring dovetail 250 may be positioned within a spring slot 260 on the rotor 180.
In use, the compressive stress spring 210 may be positioned within the shank pocket 205. The arms 230, 240 of the U-shaped clip 220 may be compressed and then placed in contact with the shanks 150 of the adjacent buckets 120, 130 about the minimum neck width region 155 towards the platform 160. When released, the arms 230, 240 of the U-shaped clip 220 impart a force and therefore compressive stress about the shanks 150. This compressive stress helps to minimize the interlaminar tensile stress generally present in this region of the buckets 120, 130. The compressive stress spring 210 may be retained by the rotor 180 via the spring dovetail 250 so as to minimize any radial load increase on the buckets 120, 130.
The force of the arms 230, 240 returning to their non-deformed shape thus contacts the shanks 150 so as to impart this compressive force. This force generates compressive stress that counteracts the interlaminar tensile stress therein. High interlaminar tensile stress about the shank 150 and the minimum neck region 150 generally dictate how thick the shank 150 must be in order to carry the load of the airfoil 170. The interlaminar tensile stress also impact on the overall life span of the component. By reducing the interlaminar tensile stresses in the shank 150 and the minimum neck region 155, a wider range of design choices may be possible. Moreover, less material may used to reduce the overall costs while lower stresses should improve overall component lifetime.
It should be apparent that the foregoing relates only to certain embodiments of the present application and the resultant patent. Numerous changes and modifications may be made herein by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the general spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims and the equivalents thereof,
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. DE-FC26-05NT42643, awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
980480 | Bishop | Jan 1911 | A |
3001760 | Guernsey et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3037741 | Tuft | Jun 1962 | A |
3266771 | Walton | Aug 1966 | A |
3294364 | Stanley | Dec 1966 | A |
3761200 | Gardiner | Sep 1973 | A |
4281967 | Mouille et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4655687 | Atkinson | Apr 1987 | A |
5143517 | Vermont | Sep 1992 | A |
5284421 | Chlus et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
6217283 | Ravenhall et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7374400 | Boswell | May 2008 | B2 |
7510379 | Marusko et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7556477 | Sherlock et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20060141257 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090269203 | Care et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090317612 | Subramanian et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2372094 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2112466 | Jul 1983 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion from EP Application No. 12176536.6 dated Oct. 2, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130071248 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |