1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to satellite video systems, and in particular, to a method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for efficiently delivering satellite broadcast signals.
2. Description of the Related Art
Satellite broadcasting of communications signals has become commonplace. Satellite distribution of commercial signals for use in television programming currently utilizes multiple feedhorns on a single Outdoor Unit (ODU) which supply signals to up to eight IRDs on separate cables from a multiswitch.
System 100 uses signals sent from Satellite A (SatA) 102, Satellite B (SatB) 104, and Satellite C (SatC) 106 that are directly broadcast to an Outdoor Unit (ODU) 108 that is typically attached to the outside of a house 110. ODU 108 receives these signals and sends the received signals to IRD 112, which decodes the signals and separates the signals into viewer channels, which are then passed to monitor 114 for viewing by a user. There can be more than one satellite transmitting from each orbital location (slot). The orbital slots are typically designated by their longitude, so, for example, a satellite 102 located in the orbital slot at 101 degrees West Longitude (WL) is usually referred to as transmitting from “101.”
Satellite uplink signals 116 are transmitted by one or more uplink facilities 118 to the satellites 102-104 that are typically in geosynchronous orbit. Satellites 102-106 amplify and rebroadcast the uplink signals 116, through transponders located on the satellite, as downlink signals 120. Depending on the satellite 102-106 antenna pattern, the downlink signals 120 are directed towards geographic areas for reception by the ODU 108.
Each satellite 102-106 broadcasts downlink signals 120 in typically thirty-two (32) different frequencies, which are licensed to various users for broadcasting of programming, which can be audio, video, or data signals, or any combination. These signals are typically located in the Ku-band of frequencies, i.e., 11-18 GHz, but can also be broadcast in the Ka-band of frequencies, i.e., 18-40 GHz, but typically 20-30 GHz.
As satellites 102-106 broadcast additional services and additional channels to viewers, it will be necessary to deliver these services in a more efficient manner.
To minimize the limitations in the prior art, and to minimize other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses a computationally efficient design for broadcast satellite single wire and/or direct demod interface.
A broadcast satellite single wire interface in accordance with the present invention comprises a low noise block amplifier module having multiple outputs, a plurality of filter banks, each filter bank coupled to each of the outputs of the low noise block amplifier module in a respective fashion and comprising a plurality of filters, and a plurality of analog-to-digital (A/D) converters, each A/D converter coupled to a filter in the plurality of filters in the plurality of filter banks in a respective fashion, wherein the A/D converters directly sample incoming downconverted broadcast satellite signals and the sampled incoming downconverted broadcast signals are output on a single wire in a stacked output.
Such an interface further optionally comprises the sampling frequency of the A/D converters being adjustable, a digital signal processor (DSP), the DSP comprising a plurality of polyphase bandpass filters, the plurality of polyphase bandpass filters overlapping in terms of passbands, a plurality of stacked outputs being present, at least one of the plurality of stacked outputs being an In-phase/Quadrature phase (I/Q) near-baseband output, and the I/Q near-baseband output being networked onto a distribution layer.
Other features and advantages are inherent in the system disclosed or will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and which is shown, by way of illustration, several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Overview
Recent advances in high speed Analog to Digital (A/D) converters open up the possibility of direct A/D conversion of baseband or near baseband 500 MHz wide Satellite downlink signals and thereby opens up the possibility of all digital demultiplexing (demuxing) of one or more 500 MHz complexes or transponders and subsequent all digital multiplexing (muxing) of a selected subset of these transponder channels onto a single wire interface for home distribution. The possibility of all digital demuxing and feeding of selected transponder baseband I/Q signals for direct demod for subsequent home or multi-dwelling distribution over any suitable physical/network layer protocols now also becomes possible.
To capitalize on these opportunities of an all-digital demuxing/muxing and baseband I/Q interfaces, computationally efficient Digital Signal Processing (DSP) architectures are required. It is assumed that simple brute force digital mimicry of the analog building blocks of demuxing/muxing/conversion processes will not lead to commercially viable designs. By bringing together the high-speed A/D hardware and computationally efficient DSP techniques, and adapting them specifically for the purposes of demuxing, muxing, and baseband I/Q conversion, the present invention provides one or more preferred embodiments with significant commercial advantages over other current designs.
No known previously proposed satellite home/MDU distribution design exists to create a practical all digital implementation of the demuxing, muxing, and direct digital demodulation (demod) interface. This invention proposes a number of embodiments of such designs which utilize computationally efficient techniques which allow for commercially viable all digital implementation of these functions.
The present invention allows for better overall performance of an embodiment of a Single Wire Multiswitch (SWM) architecture because the present invention allows for the distribution of more channels within the same bandwidth (i.e., single wire bandwidth) through tighter packing of channels. Distribution of additional channels allows for the support of additional IRDs, or the same number of IRDs with less wired bandwidth. Further, embodiments of the present invention allow for inexpensive provision of baseband I/Q signals for reduced cost integration of a significant portion of the current IRD. Further still, embodiments of the present invention allow for the ability to provide greater flexibility for future system designs, and the potential of a smaller footprint for the SWM into the current system. Embodiments of the present invention also allow for simpler integration and interfaces between the parts of the present system, by simplifying the interface of shared demod resources without expending any bandwidth. This simplification allows for future products, such as Home Gateway and Multi-Dwelling Unit (MDU) architectures, to become possible.
Digital SWM
Hardware advances have increased A/D sampling rates in excess of 1 Gigasample/second (1 Gsps) with a good Effective Number Of Bits (ENOB) and an adequate linearity performance figure. Advances in Multi-rate Digital Signal Processing techniques coupled with nanometer Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) processes allow applications with significant signal processing capabilities. These factors make it possible to make an all-digital replacement for the demux and mux functions of the Single Wire Multiswitch (SWM). Further, these technological advances allow for a baseband and/or near baseband digital I/Q interface for cost-effective integration of a significant portion of the IRD front end functionality.
The present invention provides embodiments for a digital replacement for the hardware shown in
Each LNB signal 202-208, as shown in
After down conversion within module 300, the Ku-band signals 302, 304, and 308 are downconverted to an Intermediate Frequency (IF) band, 500 MHz wide, in the frequency range of 950-1450 MHz. The Ka-band signals 306 and 310 are downconverted into two different 500 MHz wide bandwidths, namely the 250-750 MHz bandwidth (known as Ka-LO IF band or Ka-B IF band) and the 1650-2150 MHz bandwidth (known as Ka-HI IF band or Ka-A IF band), and are combined in various combinations to form signals 202-208
The SWM 200 shown in
Coarse Granularity Design
The SWM module 300 is modified into module 312, where signals 302-310 are combined into different signals that are to be used as inputs to a modified SWM. Rather than stacking 1500 MHz into a single signal, as is done with signals 202-208, a larger number of outputs 312-326 are used. Although eight outputs 312-326 are shown, a larger or smaller number of outputs 312-326 are possible without departing from the scope of the present invention.
As shown in
Each input “x” 500, 502, etc., receives one of the A/D converter 404 outputs 406-428, and there can be extra inputs x 500, 502, etc., to allow for expansion of the system. Each typical input x 500 is typically channelized into uniformly spaced K filters 504. The portion k 506 of the K filters 504 actually utilized will be different for different LNB paths, and, typically, k=3 for Ka HI, k=12 for Ka LO, and k=16 for Ku. L, the number of filter bands on the output side, is set to be equal to the number of stacked carriers desired at the stacked output 210.
There are many embodiments within the scope of the present invention that can create computationally efficient DSP architectures. Another example embodiment of the present invention uses multi-rate poly phase techniques and takes advantage of the correspondence between the complex mixing and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), as shown in
In
The signals 406-428, after being filtered by filters 602 are subjected to Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) in FFTs 606, and then selected, reordered, and combined in multiplexer 608. The combined signal is further processed to generate stacked output 210. Alternatively, the present invention can use a non-maximally decimated filter bank of overlapping filters. This approach, along with the added technique of near-perfect reconstruction techniques, allow for fine granularity.
A choice of L=32 is typically chosen for the output despite a maximum of 26 channels. The choice of the power of 2 composite K and L is chosen to simplify the FFT hardware implementation. Other approaches or arrangements may also be used within the scope of the present invention.
ADC ENOB Considerations
Consider any one of the 500 MHz LNB signals 406-428. Since each signal is a composite of many signals, each signal is approximately Gaussian distributed. Given this approximation, the attack point on the ADC can be set so that the full scale deflection is 3.3 times the Root Mean Square (RMS) value of the composite signal. This corresponds to setting the probability at a 3.3 sigma event. This will result in a probability of overflow of 10−3. Under these conditions, the Signal to Quantization noise Ratio (SQR) is (6.02b+0.42) dB where b=ENOB−1. For and A/D with and ENOB of 9 bits this results in an SQU of the composite signal of 45.58 dB.
The SQR of a single transponder, in a twelve transponders mix with five high-power transponders and seven low power transponders, where a high power transponder is 10 dB higher than a low power transponder. A given low power transponder then accounts for 1/57th of the composite power, or −17.56 dB from the composite power. The transponder's Noise Equivalent Bandwidth at the receiver is 36 MHz. Quantization noise is essentially white noise over the Nyquist bandwidth. If the Nyquist bandwidth is set to 500 MHz for the composite bandwidth, then the noise BW affecting the transponder is 36/500, which is −11.43 dB down from the total quantization noise. Therefore the SQR affecting the demodulator is 48.58−17.56+11.43=42.45 dB. Since the 8PSK waveform typically has an Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) requirement of approximately 11 dB, an ENOB of 9 bits is typically satisfactory in terms of design. However, an accounting of the NPR of the finite word processing and additional details of the noise bandwidth and system settings may allow the ENOB to be relaxed from a 9 bit setting and still be within the scope of the present invention.
A fine granularity design using perfect or near perfect reconstruction polyphase filtering techniques has advantages over the coarse granularity approach. Employment of maximal decimation techniques can be used to simplify filter design if desired. For such an approach, the spectrum of each of the incoming 500 MHz blocks is subdivided much more finely than in the coarse granularity design. Where in the coarse granularity design the goal is to create a number of filters greater than or equal to the maximum number of expected transponders, in the fine granularity design the goal is to divide up the spectrum into smaller pieces. This can be done in such a way that the fine pieces of spectrum can be “glued” back together to yield a nearly perfect reconstruction of any arbitrary spectral bandwidth within the granularity specified for the design. An illustrative design for a fine granularity system is shown in
The system 700 shown in
The other outputs 706 and 708 illustrate two illustrative embodiments that include shared demod assets that do not expend any of the Single Wire Bandwidth. Other embodiments are possible within the scope of the present invention. Only one output 708 or 708 can be implemented, or other embodiments can be implemented alone or in any combination, without departing from the scope of the present invention. Output 706 illustrates an approach having an additional internal single wire interface which drives conventional receiver/demod inputs.
Output 708 illustrates an approach where that the receiver portion of the receiver demod chips can be eliminated at the same time as the last upconversion of the processed signals. These chips correspond to I/Q near baseband demodulation. Other configurations are possible if some of the output polyphase filtering is incorporated directly on the demod chip. In both outputs 706 and 708 the output of the shared demod resources is SCID filtered data which is networked onto any suitable physical layer and/or network layer protocols for distribution throughout the house or MDU. The outputs 706 and 708 are Internet Protocol (IP) type outputs, or similar, that can be output over ethernet cabling, local area networks, RF or IR signals, or other similar interfaces as desired, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present invention discloses embodiments of computationally efficient designs for broadcast satellite single wire and/or direct demod interfaces.
A broadcast satellite single wire interface in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention comprises a low noise block amplifier module having multiple outputs, a plurality of filter banks, each filter bank coupled to each of the outputs of the low noise block amplifier module in a respective fashion and comprising a plurality of filters, and a plurality of analog-to-digital (A/D) converters, each A/D converter coupled to a filter in the plurality of filters in the plurality of filter banks in a respective fashion, wherein the A/D converters directly sample incoming downconverted broadcast satellite signals and the sampled incoming downconverted broadcast signals are output on a single wire in a stacked output.
Such an interface may further optionally comprise the sampling frequency of the A/D converters being adjustable; a digital signal processor (DSP), where the DSP may comprise a plurality of polyphase bandpass filters, the plurality of polyphase bandpass filters overlapping in terms of passbands; a plurality of stacked outputs being present, where at least one of the plurality of stacked outputs being an In-phase/Quadrature phase (I/Q) near-baseband output, and the I/Q near-baseband output being networked onto a distribution layer.
A system in accordance with one or more embodiments distributes a plurality of satellite signals on a single interface, and comprises a plurality of low noise block amplifier modules, each receiving at least one satellite signal, a plurality of filter banks, each filter bank coupled to each of the outputs of the low noise block amplifier module in a respective fashion and comprising a plurality of filters, a plurality of analog-to-digital (A/D) converters, each A/D converter coupled to a filter in the plurality of filters in the plurality of filter banks in a respective fashion, wherein the A/D converters directly sample incoming downconverted broadcast satellite signals, a plurality of transformers, each transformer coupled to an A/D converter in the plurality of A/D converters in a respective fashion, and a combiner, coupled to the plurality of transformers, wherein the combiner outputs the plurality of satellite signals on the single interface.
Such a system may further optionally comprise the sampling frequency of the A/D converters being adjustable; a digital signal processor (DSP), where the DSP may comprise a plurality of polyphase bandpass filters, the plurality of polyphase bandpass filters overlapping in terms of passbands; a plurality of stacked outputs being present, where at least one of the plurality of stacked outputs being an In-phase/Quadrature phase (I/Q) near-baseband output, and the I/Q near-baseband output being networked onto a distribution layer.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but by the claims appended hereto and the full range of equivalents of the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/956,889, filed on Aug. 20, 2007, by Robert Popoli, entitled “COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT DESIGN FOR BROADCAST SATELLITE SINGLE WIRE AND/OR DIRECT DEMOD INTERFACE,” which application is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3581209 | Zimmerman | May 1971 | A |
3670275 | Kalliomaki et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
4064460 | Gargini | Dec 1977 | A |
4132952 | Hongu et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4354167 | Terreault et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4382266 | Panzer | May 1983 | A |
4397037 | Theriault | Aug 1983 | A |
4403343 | Hamada | Sep 1983 | A |
4509198 | Nagatomi | Apr 1985 | A |
4513315 | Dekker et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4530008 | McVoy | Jul 1985 | A |
4532543 | Groenewegen | Jul 1985 | A |
4538175 | Balbes et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4545075 | Miller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4556988 | Yoshisato | Dec 1985 | A |
4592093 | Ouchi et al. | May 1986 | A |
4608710 | Sugiura | Aug 1986 | A |
4628506 | Sperlich | Dec 1986 | A |
4656486 | Turner | Apr 1987 | A |
4663513 | Webber | May 1987 | A |
4667243 | Blatter et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672687 | Horton et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675732 | Oleson | Jun 1987 | A |
4710972 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4723320 | Horton | Feb 1988 | A |
4761825 | Ma | Aug 1988 | A |
4761827 | Horton et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4785306 | Adams | Nov 1988 | A |
4802239 | Ooto | Jan 1989 | A |
4805014 | Sahara et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4813036 | Whitehead | Mar 1989 | A |
4823135 | Hirashima et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4860021 | Kurosawa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866787 | Olesen | Sep 1989 | A |
4876736 | Kiewit | Oct 1989 | A |
4885803 | Hermann et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4903031 | Yamada | Feb 1990 | A |
4945410 | Walling | Jul 1990 | A |
5010400 | Oto | Apr 1991 | A |
5027430 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5068918 | Verheijen et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5073930 | Green et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5119509 | Kang | Jun 1992 | A |
5235619 | Beyers, II et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249043 | Grandmougin | Sep 1993 | A |
5276904 | Mutzig et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289272 | Rabowsky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5301352 | Nakagawa et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5382971 | Chanteau | Jan 1995 | A |
5437051 | Oto | Jul 1995 | A |
5521631 | Budow et al. | May 1996 | A |
5565805 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572517 | Safadi | Nov 1996 | A |
5574964 | Hamlin | Nov 1996 | A |
5587734 | Lauder et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5617107 | Fleming | Apr 1997 | A |
5649318 | Lusignan | Jul 1997 | A |
5675390 | Schindler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5734356 | Chang | Mar 1998 | A |
5748732 | Le Berre et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760819 | Sklar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5760822 | Coutinho | Jun 1998 | A |
5787335 | Novak | Jul 1998 | A |
5790202 | Kummer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793413 | Hylton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805806 | McArthur | Sep 1998 | A |
5805975 | Green et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835128 | MacDonald et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838740 | Kallman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848239 | Ando | Dec 1998 | A |
5864747 | Clark et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5883677 | Hofmann | Mar 1999 | A |
5886995 | Arsenault et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5898455 | Barakat et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905941 | Chanteau | May 1999 | A |
5905942 | Stoel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923288 | Pedlow, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936660 | Gurantz | Aug 1999 | A |
5959592 | Petruzzelli | Sep 1999 | A |
5970386 | Williams | Oct 1999 | A |
5982333 | Stillinger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005861 | Humpleman | Dec 1999 | A |
6011597 | Kubo | Jan 2000 | A |
6023603 | Matsubara | Feb 2000 | A |
6038425 | Jeffrey | Mar 2000 | A |
6100883 | Hoarty | Aug 2000 | A |
6104908 | Schaffner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134419 | Williams | Oct 2000 | A |
6147714 | Terasawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173164 | Shah | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188372 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192399 | Goodman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198449 | Muhlhauser et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198479 | Humpleman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202211 | Williams, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6292567 | Marland | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304618 | Hafeez et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340956 | Bowen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6397038 | Green, Sr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424817 | Hadden | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430233 | Dillon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430742 | Chanteau | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441797 | Shah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442148 | Adams et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452991 | Zak | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463266 | Shohara | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493873 | Williams | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493874 | Humpleman | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501770 | Arsenault et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510152 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6549582 | Friedman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574235 | Arslan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598231 | Basawapatna et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600897 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6653981 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6728513 | Nishina | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6762727 | Rochford et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6864855 | Fujita | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865193 | Terk | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879301 | Kozlovski | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889385 | Rakib et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6906673 | Matz et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6941576 | Amit | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944878 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7010265 | Coffin, III | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016643 | Kuether et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020081 | Tani et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039169 | Jones | May 2006 | B2 |
7069574 | Adams et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7085529 | Arsenault et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7130576 | Gurantz et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7239285 | Cook | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245671 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7257638 | Celik et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260069 | Ram et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263469 | Bajgrowicz et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7519680 | O'Neil | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7522875 | Gurantz et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7542715 | Gurantz et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7546619 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7603022 | Putterman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634250 | Prasad et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
20010055319 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020044614 | Molnar | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020140617 | Luly et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152467 | Fiallos | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154055 | Davis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154620 | Azenkot et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178454 | Antoine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181604 | Chen | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023978 | Bajgrowicz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030129960 | Kato | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030185174 | Currivan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217362 | Summers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220072 | Coffin, III | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040060065 | James et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064689 | Carr | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107436 | Ishizaki | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136455 | Akhter et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153942 | Shtutman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161031 | Kwentus et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163125 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184521 | Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192190 | Motoyama | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198237 | Abutaleb et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203425 | Coffin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214537 | Bargroff et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229583 | Ogino | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244044 | Brommer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244059 | Coman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255229 | Shen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261110 | Kolbeck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002640 | Putterman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033846 | Sankaranarayan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052335 | Chen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054315 | Bajgrowicz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057428 | Fujita | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060525 | Schwartz, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066367 | Fyke et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071882 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050118984 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138663 | Throckmorton et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050184923 | Saito et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190777 | Hess et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193419 | Lindstrom et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198673 | Kit | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204388 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240969 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050264395 | Bassi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289605 | Jeon | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018345 | Nadarajah et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030259 | Hetzel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041912 | Kuhns | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048202 | Bontempi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080707 | Laksono | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112407 | Kakiuchi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133612 | Abedi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060174282 | Dennison et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225104 | James et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259929 | James et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294512 | Seiden | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070083898 | Norin et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070202800 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080064355 | Sutskover et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080127277 | Kuschak | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134279 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080205514 | Nishio et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090013358 | Throckmorton et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090150937 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090222875 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252316 | Ratmanski et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1413021 | Apr 2003 | CN |
10114082 | Jan 2003 | DE |
1447987 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2354650 | Mar 2001 | GB |
2377111 | Dec 2002 | GB |
11355076 | Dec 1999 | JP |
02082351 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60956889 | Aug 2007 | US |